Comments on: Time magazine reporters admit they voted for Romney http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:01:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mr_Conservative_Cat http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240662 Mr_Conservative_Cat Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:00:48 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240662 Michelle, the gag in the title is funny once you read it's a set-up, and I chuckled, but the fact that so many people would be surprised by such a hypothetical event really underscores the utterly sad state of affairs when it comes to this country's "unbiased journalism". Ben Franklin would be a very dispirited man right now. Michelle,

the gag in the title is funny once you read it’s a set-up, and I chuckled, but the fact that so many people would be surprised by such a hypothetical event really underscores the utterly sad state of affairs when it comes to this country’s “unbiased journalism”.

Ben Franklin would be a very dispirited man right now.

]]> By: Laree http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240498 Laree Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:07:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240498 I thought I would wrap up Shuster, any NYT newspaper left? This is a link to Extreme Mortman, Spud on ICN last blog on more pimping, linked to this. So Olbermann can state, that they were pimping General Patraeus, back in 2007, meaning the Bush administration was prostituting him. BUT Chelsea Clinton is off limits, no pimping zone. hmm.. when is it just slang and when is it an offense. I think it is when you can look like an offended victim in the national media, during a presidential election cycle. http://www.extrememortman.com/cable-tv/pimp-my-right/ I thought I would wrap up Shuster, any NYT newspaper left? This is a link to Extreme Mortman, Spud on ICN last blog on more pimping, linked to this. So Olbermann can state, that they were pimping General Patraeus, back in 2007, meaning the Bush administration was prostituting him. BUT Chelsea Clinton is off limits, no pimping zone. hmm.. when is it just slang and when is it an offense. I think it is when you can look like an offended victim in the national media, during a presidential election cycle.

http://www.extrememortman.com/cable-tv/pimp-my-right/

]]> By: Ragspierre http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240371 Ragspierre Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:52:39 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240371 I came in from my appointed chores to find your headline. That was <em>harsh</em>, Michelle... I came in from my appointed chores to find your headline.

That was harsh, Michelle…

]]> By: mattymatt10 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240334 mattymatt10 Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:13:47 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240334 Wow, I totally fell for that headline. hehe Nice job. :) Wow, I totally fell for that headline. hehe

Nice job. :)

]]> By: Dave Turson http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240252 Dave Turson Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:17:14 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240252 The Obama voter at Time magazine <a href="http://time-blog.com/tuned_in/2007/06/should_reporters_give_to_campa.html?xid=rss-tunedin" rel="nofollow"> blogged last year </a> about his support for reporters who donate to political campaigns, except for political writers, of course. The Obama voter at Time magazine blogged last year about his support for reporters who donate to political campaigns, except for political writers, of course.

]]> By: Yiddish Steel http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240177 Yiddish Steel Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:48:08 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240177 No surprise at all. A "media critic" for Time Mazgazine confessing that he voted for Obama just to "come clean" for his readers. <em>SHOCK! </em> I still don't have any respect for these MSM nit-wits, regardless of their political disclosures. No surprise at all. A “media critic” for Time Mazgazine confessing that he voted for Obama just to “come clean” for his readers. SHOCK! I still don’t have any respect for these MSM nit-wits, regardless of their political disclosures.

]]> By: JHSII http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240151 JHSII Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:07:51 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240151 The first thing that came through my mind wasn't shock and surprise, but wondering who at Time magazine would be stupid enough to admit voting republican - and counting down the seconds until they were fired! Good one though!! LOL The first thing that came through my mind wasn’t shock and surprise, but wondering who at Time magazine would be stupid enough to admit voting republican – and counting down the seconds until they were fired!

Good one though!! LOL

]]> By: Boomer http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240117 Boomer Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:39:13 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240117 Thanks for the levity Michelle it is greatly appreciated with the bad news we have had to swallow over the last couple of weeks. I actually have a smile on my face now. Thanks for the levity Michelle it is greatly appreciated with the bad news we have had to swallow over the last couple of weeks. I actually have a smile on my face now.

]]> By: Laree http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240098 Laree Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:59:10 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240098 Is this what no one is supposed to be noticing and the reason David Shuster took one for the home team? Don't look at the results, I am dissing Hillary Clinton look over here, over here. Why am I not hearing more about Obama the real insurgent on the Dem side? http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2008/02/attack_of_the_s.php Is this what no one is supposed to be noticing and the reason David Shuster took one for the home team? Don’t look at the results, I am dissing Hillary Clinton look over here, over here. Why am I not hearing more about Obama the real insurgent on the Dem side?

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2008/02/attack_of_the_s.php

]]> By: capitano http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240094 capitano Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:53:39 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240094 Yesterday Chris Matthews was interviewed by an MSNBC news bunny (yes, I know, but he's on the payroll and they have a lot of airtime to fill). So she asked him whether John McCain could bring the Republican Party together? Matthews: <i>Would that be a good thing?</i> Newsbunny (obviously taken aback by his frank response): <i>Well for the Republicans I suppose it would.</i> Matthews: (Drivel about his prior interview with Tom Delay who refused to kiss McCain's ring after the speech). Yesterday Chris Matthews was interviewed by an MSNBC news bunny (yes, I know, but he’s on the payroll and they have a lot of airtime to fill). So she asked him whether John McCain could bring the Republican Party together?

Matthews: Would that be a good thing?

Newsbunny (obviously taken aback by his frank response): Well for the Republicans I suppose it would.

Matthews: (Drivel about his prior interview with Tom Delay who refused to kiss McCain’s ring after the speech).

]]> By: lgm http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240089 lgm Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:48:05 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240089 Reporters follow politicians full time. They know what they said yesterday. They watch them duck questions they don't want to answer. Is it any wonder that they didn't vote for the biggest "candidate of change" (McCain's phrase) in the race? They know McCain has only a vague understanding of the economy. Why should they trust him to run it? And Huck? Heck! He doesn't know anything about anything. Reporters follow politicians full time. They know what they said yesterday. They watch them duck questions they don’t want to answer. Is it any wonder that they didn’t vote for the biggest “candidate of change” (McCain’s phrase) in the race?

They know McCain has only a vague understanding of the economy. Why should they trust him to run it?

And Huck? Heck! He doesn’t know anything about anything.

]]> By: Laree http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240086 Laree Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:44:22 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240086 This is Marty’s blog that was posted the morning of Feb 6th she states Obama in the lead with delegates. I didn’t view the samething on the Imus in the Morning- Crawl, until Friday Feb 8th. Did anyone notice when it started being reported that Obama was ahead in the MSM the cablenews outlets? David Shuster made this remark on Thursday. I am just saying everyone is discussing Shuster’s remark about CLINTON in the newscycle but not the important news Obama has been leading in the delegate count, at least known since Marty reported it on Wednesday Morning. http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2008/02/crouching-tiger-hidden-dragon.html The result of the Shuster comment, Hillary can posture as the underdog and insurgent…no she isn’t, with the Shuster comment, Clinton is getting more attention, then Obama’s delegate lead. Which appeared to break the MSM membrane on Friday? If you think this is conspiracy stuff, think how easy it was for the "Don't Taze me Bro" kid to manipulate the newscycle and these folks work for a cablenews outlet so they kind of know how it works to manipulate the MSM, with a soundbite. In this case Pimping Chelsea Clinton. Unfair advantage Clinton? That is one of her favorite words Fair or Unfair, she uses it all the time. Well we are not talking about Obama's lead are we? This is Marty’s blog that was posted the morning of Feb 6th she states Obama in the lead with delegates. I didn’t view the samething on the Imus in the Morning- Crawl, until Friday Feb 8th. Did anyone notice when it started being reported that Obama was ahead in the MSM the cablenews outlets?

David Shuster made this remark on Thursday. I am just saying everyone is discussing Shuster’s remark about CLINTON in the newscycle but not the important news Obama has been leading in the delegate count, at least known since Marty reported it on Wednesday Morning.

http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2008/02/crouching-tiger-hidden-dragon.html

The result of the Shuster comment, Hillary can posture as the underdog and insurgent…no she isn’t, with the Shuster comment, Clinton is getting more attention, then Obama’s delegate lead. Which appeared to break the MSM membrane on Friday?

If you think this is conspiracy stuff, think how easy it was for the “Don’t Taze me Bro” kid to manipulate the newscycle and these folks work for a cablenews outlet so they kind of know how it works to manipulate the MSM, with a soundbite. In this case Pimping Chelsea Clinton. Unfair advantage Clinton? That is one of her favorite words Fair or Unfair, she uses it all the time. Well we are not talking about Obama’s lead are we?

]]> By: Gator70 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240072 Gator70 Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:23:07 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240072 That was funny, I'm on Pacific time so I'm still waking up here, that grabbed my attention. That was funny, I’m on Pacific time so I’m still waking up here, that grabbed my attention.

]]> By: zorro http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240067 zorro Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:17:39 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240067 Good one Michelle! I'm awake now! I'm right there with you <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240062" rel="nofollow">Charles</a>. If McCain wants to show us some action in the way of introducing a bill to close the borders instead of opening them, that would be a start. Good one Michelle! I’m awake now!

I’m right there with you Charles.

If McCain wants to show us some action in the way of introducing a bill to close the borders instead of opening them, that would be a start.

]]> By: meatpieandtatters http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-240063 meatpieandtatters Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:13:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/09/time-magazine-reporters-admit-they-voted-for-romney/#comment-240063 theliberalmediaiseverywhere! theliberalmediaiseverywhere!

]]>