<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, what about our fence? Update: Do your congresscritters know about the Mexico stimulus plan?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: facebook 123</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-1148910</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook 123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-1148910</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Superb website...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Superb website&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Merida Initiative update: White House sneaks it into war spending bill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-316238</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Merida Initiative update: White House sneaks it into war spending bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-316238</guid>
		<description>[...] been little congressional oversight since then&#8211;let alone awareness-of the plan. Mexico has been arrogantly clamoring for the money, even as it continues to trash  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been little congressional oversight since then&#8211;let alone awareness-of the plan. Mexico has been arrogantly clamoring for the money, even as it continues to trash  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanMan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-256256</link>
		<dc:creator>DanMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-256256</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t reall all of the comments so I hope I&#039;m not repeating another post but I would give in to no fence if ALL INCENTIVES were eliminated.  No welfare, health care, education, anchor baby citizenship, jobs, etc.  Of course, that would require enforcing existing laws and challenging a liberal judge&#039;s ruling every now and then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t reall all of the comments so I hope I&#8217;m not repeating another post but I would give in to no fence if ALL INCENTIVES were eliminated.  No welfare, health care, education, anchor baby citizenship, jobs, etc.  Of course, that would require enforcing existing laws and challenging a liberal judge&#8217;s ruling every now and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; The Fence to Nowhere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-255919</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; The Fence to Nowhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-255919</guid>
		<description>[...] Meanwhile, ahem, the $1.4 billion Mexican stimulus/border security plan forges ahead unopposed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meanwhile, ahem, the $1.4 billion Mexican stimulus/border security plan forges ahead unopposed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Border insecurity alert 99,999: Holes in the wall</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-250736</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Border insecurity alert 99,999: Holes in the wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-250736</guid>
		<description>[...] hey, no matter. We&#8217;re going to fork over $1.4 billion to Mexico so they can build a fence on their  southern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hey, no matter. We&#8217;re going to fork over $1.4 billion to Mexico so they can build a fence on their  southern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyDog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-244867</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-244867</guid>
		<description>TK-421
&lt;blockquote&gt;how in the hell will we afoard to build and MAINTIAN A wall of that size and all along the border&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Have you taken your medication today?

&lt;blockquote&gt;And most cops I’ve meet have been on the take on one form or another.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not all cops are on the take or corrupt but what does all that have to do with a dual layered border fence that would be enforced by the BP?

If you looked at any of my other posts on the proposed border fence you would know it is not a wall even though you keep comparing it to the Berlin Wall.

As for proof, I suggest you do some research by doing a google and look it up yourself. The facts are all over the internet. A good place to start is Duncan Hunter&#039;s website.

After all, you think I am on the take and corrupt so why would you believe anything I post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TK-421</p>
<blockquote><p>how in the hell will we afoard to build and MAINTIAN A wall of that size and all along the border</p></blockquote>
<p>Have you taken your medication today?</p>
<blockquote><p>And most cops I’ve meet have been on the take on one form or another.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not all cops are on the take or corrupt but what does all that have to do with a dual layered border fence that would be enforced by the BP?</p>
<p>If you looked at any of my other posts on the proposed border fence you would know it is not a wall even though you keep comparing it to the Berlin Wall.</p>
<p>As for proof, I suggest you do some research by doing a google and look it up yourself. The facts are all over the internet. A good place to start is Duncan Hunter&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>After all, you think I am on the take and corrupt so why would you believe anything I post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The White House wants a $1.4 billion stimulus/national security package…for Mexico &#171;</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-244736</link>
		<dc:creator>The White House wants a $1.4 billion stimulus/national security package…for Mexico &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-244736</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, do our Congressmen know about this???  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, do our Congressmen know about this???  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK-421</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-244242</link>
		<dc:creator>TK-421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-244242</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the typo&#039;s I just get flusterd with our &quot;brave&quot; men in blue. From Experance I will trust a soldier, even one with a Military Coup well before I will a cop. And besides the Security incidents I have many many other reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the typo&#8217;s I just get flusterd with our &#8220;brave&#8221; men in blue. From Experance I will trust a soldier, even one with a Military Coup well before I will a cop. And besides the Security incidents I have many many other reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK-421</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-244238</link>
		<dc:creator>TK-421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-244238</guid>
		<description>Okay mister high and mighty, how in the hell will we afoard to build and MAINTIAN A wall of that size and all along the border, the fact no one points out our northern border, which I might add canada allows in a large number of people from Iran and Pakistan is a sign of what seems to be selective Racisim. And show me PROOF that your fence works,and a drop in those caught doesn&#039;t mean that there is less coming. For instance I have you watch one side of a mountian for a year, and count the snow, the next year the snow pattern shifts so the snow you see is less. That doesn&#039;t mean as your logic suggest that there is less snow.

I happen to also have seen police response times, my step father used to work for the school system when I was growing up and when the alarm was set off the alarm dispatch always Called two people, The Police, and Us. Guess who always arived first, even with the same traveling distance? US, by 15 minuets or more. And not a one time event, but several, we started comign armed as we knew, like many are learning that the police arn&#039;t here to protect you, but to clean up the mess afterwards. And most cops I&#039;ve meet have been on the take on one form or another. So my illogical &quot;hitmen&quot; as you but them are stupid eeh? Givin I&#039;ve done my duty and have twice reported on drug stashes with my life on the line, only to recive threats afterwards and the cops never finding anything, Well lets say I&#039;ll trust the army a hell of alot sooner than I will ANY cop or Politition, your all in the same boat to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay mister high and mighty, how in the hell will we afoard to build and MAINTIAN A wall of that size and all along the border, the fact no one points out our northern border, which I might add canada allows in a large number of people from Iran and Pakistan is a sign of what seems to be selective Racisim. And show me PROOF that your fence works,and a drop in those caught doesn&#8217;t mean that there is less coming. For instance I have you watch one side of a mountian for a year, and count the snow, the next year the snow pattern shifts so the snow you see is less. That doesn&#8217;t mean as your logic suggest that there is less snow.</p>
<p>I happen to also have seen police response times, my step father used to work for the school system when I was growing up and when the alarm was set off the alarm dispatch always Called two people, The Police, and Us. Guess who always arived first, even with the same traveling distance? US, by 15 minuets or more. And not a one time event, but several, we started comign armed as we knew, like many are learning that the police arn&#8217;t here to protect you, but to clean up the mess afterwards. And most cops I&#8217;ve meet have been on the take on one form or another. So my illogical &#8220;hitmen&#8221; as you but them are stupid eeh? Givin I&#8217;ve done my duty and have twice reported on drug stashes with my life on the line, only to recive threats afterwards and the cops never finding anything, Well lets say I&#8217;ll trust the army a hell of alot sooner than I will ANY cop or Politition, your all in the same boat to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyDog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-244140</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-244140</guid>
		<description>TK-421:

You arguments about fences not being an effective deterrent are total BS.
For example you said;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;And for Prisons, they don’t work, Guards on the watch towers that will SHOOT you do&quot;.

&quot;And if it takes more than 5 minuets for even a small force to investigate (Small as in 12 men, anything less on a group of 20 border jumpers that are armed will get you killed) it they would have cut it, rammed it, or but, omg ladders up to climb it.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Before I got into Law Enforcement, I worked briefly in a Maximum Security Prison. While it is true that the guards  have orders to shoot to kill if the inmates attempt to breach the fence, what do you think would happen if there was no fence on the perimeter of the prison?

In addition, if may interest you to know that the BP, usually work alone on the southern border and not in teams of 12 men. They arrest groups of 20 or more illegals on a daily basis usually with a single man unit providing back up.

You arguments against building a fence on our southern border defy the facts we do know about the deterrent they provide in general and specifically at the southern border.

As I posted previously, the double layered &quot;Israeli Style&quot; fence installed in the San Diego border region lowered border crossings by 95%.The CBO,Congressional Budget Office, has studied the cost benefit of installing the fence on the Mexican Border and concluded that it would reduce border crossings by 70-80%.

&quot;The fence has produced some improvement in the area, according to a Congressional Research Service report in 2005 that said illegal alien apprehensions along the fence region dropped from 202,000 in 1992 to 9,000 in 2004.&quot;

&quot;Meanwhile, vehicle drive-throughs in the region have fallen from between six to 10 per day before the construction of the fence to four drive-throughs for the entire year of 2004. Crime in San Diego dropped 56.3 percent between 1989 and 2000, according to the FBI Crime Index.&quot;

For you to continue to argue that the fence will not work without installing machine gun nests and having 12 men hit squads defies common sense and in the face of the known facts on the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TK-421:</p>
<p>You arguments about fences not being an effective deterrent are total BS.<br />
For example you said;</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;And for Prisons, they don’t work, Guards on the watch towers that will SHOOT you do&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;And if it takes more than 5 minuets for even a small force to investigate (Small as in 12 men, anything less on a group of 20 border jumpers that are armed will get you killed) it they would have cut it, rammed it, or but, omg ladders up to climb it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Before I got into Law Enforcement, I worked briefly in a Maximum Security Prison. While it is true that the guards  have orders to shoot to kill if the inmates attempt to breach the fence, what do you think would happen if there was no fence on the perimeter of the prison?</p>
<p>In addition, if may interest you to know that the BP, usually work alone on the southern border and not in teams of 12 men. They arrest groups of 20 or more illegals on a daily basis usually with a single man unit providing back up.</p>
<p>You arguments against building a fence on our southern border defy the facts we do know about the deterrent they provide in general and specifically at the southern border.</p>
<p>As I posted previously, the double layered &#8220;Israeli Style&#8221; fence installed in the San Diego border region lowered border crossings by 95%.The CBO,Congressional Budget Office, has studied the cost benefit of installing the fence on the Mexican Border and concluded that it would reduce border crossings by 70-80%.</p>
<p>&#8220;The fence has produced some improvement in the area, according to a Congressional Research Service report in 2005 that said illegal alien apprehensions along the fence region dropped from 202,000 in 1992 to 9,000 in 2004.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, vehicle drive-throughs in the region have fallen from between six to 10 per day before the construction of the fence to four drive-throughs for the entire year of 2004. Crime in San Diego dropped 56.3 percent between 1989 and 2000, according to the FBI Crime Index.&#8221;</p>
<p>For you to continue to argue that the fence will not work without installing machine gun nests and having 12 men hit squads defies common sense and in the face of the known facts on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK-421</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-243863</link>
		<dc:creator>TK-421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-243863</guid>
		<description>The White house also has members of the Sec. Service and Spec ops behind every Bush and snipers on the roof. People have climbed the fence many a time, only to be taken down a momments later. And for Prisons, they don&#039;t work, Guards on the watch towers that will SHOOT you do. Public property, climbed them all the time myself, never got a word said about it. No one was watching with any sort of power to detain me, if you think they will stop at the fence and just turn around, I want some of what your taking. Car lots, yeah tell that to people in Jail for GTA. 

A Fence alone is a false sense of Securitym you need man power to man it, not fancy shamcy electronics that a hooligan can take out or a man with a high powered rifle. And if it takes more than 5 minuets for even a small force to investigate (Small as in 12 men, anything less on a group of 20 border jumpers that are armed will get you killed) it they would have cut it, rammed it, or but, omg ladders up to climb it. We Need a static defense line that is manned, with roving airsupport and ground patrols, this will take half a million men on the Southern Border.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White house also has members of the Sec. Service and Spec ops behind every Bush and snipers on the roof. People have climbed the fence many a time, only to be taken down a momments later. And for Prisons, they don&#8217;t work, Guards on the watch towers that will SHOOT you do. Public property, climbed them all the time myself, never got a word said about it. No one was watching with any sort of power to detain me, if you think they will stop at the fence and just turn around, I want some of what your taking. Car lots, yeah tell that to people in Jail for GTA. </p>
<p>A Fence alone is a false sense of Securitym you need man power to man it, not fancy shamcy electronics that a hooligan can take out or a man with a high powered rifle. And if it takes more than 5 minuets for even a small force to investigate (Small as in 12 men, anything less on a group of 20 border jumpers that are armed will get you killed) it they would have cut it, rammed it, or but, omg ladders up to climb it. We Need a static defense line that is manned, with roving airsupport and ground patrols, this will take half a million men on the Southern Border.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longbow</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-243757</link>
		<dc:creator>longbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-243757</guid>
		<description>Fences are not a 100% guarantee.  But to just say fences don&#039;t work seems pretty simplistic - and wrong.

If fences do not work, why are we giving Mexico over a billion dollars of our taxpayer money so they can contruct one on *their* southern border?

If fences don&#039;t work, why do we have one around the White House?  Why do we have them around correctional facilities, car and truck lots and other public and private property?

And another rhetorical question - why should I support any crapweasel Congress critter, President Bush or any party that supports this travesty?

No more voting for the so-called &quot;lesser of two evils!&quot;  No way, José!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fences are not a 100% guarantee.  But to just say fences don&#8217;t work seems pretty simplistic &#8211; and wrong.</p>
<p>If fences do not work, why are we giving Mexico over a billion dollars of our taxpayer money so they can contruct one on *their* southern border?</p>
<p>If fences don&#8217;t work, why do we have one around the White House?  Why do we have them around correctional facilities, car and truck lots and other public and private property?</p>
<p>And another rhetorical question &#8211; why should I support any crapweasel Congress critter, President Bush or any party that supports this travesty?</p>
<p>No more voting for the so-called &#8220;lesser of two evils!&#8221;  No way, José!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottyDog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-243638</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottyDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-243638</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;purplepeep said:

ScottyDog,

Wow, that’s an amazing photographic fence comparison, Dog. Thanks.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Your welcome. I live in California/Mexifornia and have watched it turn into a third world shixx hole.

I am trying to do my part in waking up people that the NAU is why our immigration laws are not being enforced before we loose our Constitutional Republic.&lt;blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>purplepeep said:</p>
<p>ScottyDog,</p>
<p>Wow, that’s an amazing photographic fence comparison, Dog. Thanks.</p></blockquote>
<p>Your welcome. I live in California/Mexifornia and have watched it turn into a third world shixx hole.</p>
<p>I am trying to do my part in waking up people that the NAU is why our immigration laws are not being enforced before we loose our Constitutional Republic.<br />
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK-421</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-243428</link>
		<dc:creator>TK-421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-243428</guid>
		<description>If it were left to me I would only build walls near border town, and five miles on the flanks of each. Low level water ways on the Rio Grande would recive the same with a two mile streach on each side toward deep water. IF able the river walls would have run offs dug to the sides, to creat deep water &quot;trench&quot; Pools. Each section of the wall and border its self would have every mile, or mile and half, watch towers. Equiped with satalite camera&#039;s and a machine gun unit with a 12-16 man squad. Every 20 miles would be a barracks structure with a platoon of men. And at various intrevels behind the border military Battalion staging areas to deal with any problems the tower and Barracks Garrsion could not deal with. The desert area&#039;s would have patrol towers only a mile inland on each side. Trying to man all of it would be expensive.

Have low flying reconisance Aircraft to keep an eye on those area&#039;s and the watch tower zones. Sensors are nice but can be jammed and cost alot. The TV sat cams if turned off alert the nearest platoon and Battalion barracks so that makes a fast reaction AND keeps corruption at bay. As to our ports, I say less money on Cruise Missiles and more on PT boats to patrol the &quot;brown&quot; seas with defensive instillations at each port (SAMS and anti-Ship batteries), and roving patrols in the air and ground on landable beaches.

Course It is better to arrest and then see why they are sneaking over, if its a legit reasson, such as the Vietmanese feeling communist forces and arn&#039;t criminal, I say welcome them. They are in need of help and could not come here other wise. If they are sneaking over for work to send money to the homeland, deport them. If they ever fire at the towers or troops and threaten agressive action bring them down. 

But making a gaint electric fence isn&#039;t realistic, given power requirements and given that if one end of the fence was to short out the whole system would fallow. I say also to let the Military man this defensive line. Though in a western nation this amount of militarisation isn&#039;t going to be taken likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were left to me I would only build walls near border town, and five miles on the flanks of each. Low level water ways on the Rio Grande would recive the same with a two mile streach on each side toward deep water. IF able the river walls would have run offs dug to the sides, to creat deep water &#8220;trench&#8221; Pools. Each section of the wall and border its self would have every mile, or mile and half, watch towers. Equiped with satalite camera&#8217;s and a machine gun unit with a 12-16 man squad. Every 20 miles would be a barracks structure with a platoon of men. And at various intrevels behind the border military Battalion staging areas to deal with any problems the tower and Barracks Garrsion could not deal with. The desert area&#8217;s would have patrol towers only a mile inland on each side. Trying to man all of it would be expensive.</p>
<p>Have low flying reconisance Aircraft to keep an eye on those area&#8217;s and the watch tower zones. Sensors are nice but can be jammed and cost alot. The TV sat cams if turned off alert the nearest platoon and Battalion barracks so that makes a fast reaction AND keeps corruption at bay. As to our ports, I say less money on Cruise Missiles and more on PT boats to patrol the &#8220;brown&#8221; seas with defensive instillations at each port (SAMS and anti-Ship batteries), and roving patrols in the air and ground on landable beaches.</p>
<p>Course It is better to arrest and then see why they are sneaking over, if its a legit reasson, such as the Vietmanese feeling communist forces and arn&#8217;t criminal, I say welcome them. They are in need of help and could not come here other wise. If they are sneaking over for work to send money to the homeland, deport them. If they ever fire at the towers or troops and threaten agressive action bring them down. </p>
<p>But making a gaint electric fence isn&#8217;t realistic, given power requirements and given that if one end of the fence was to short out the whole system would fallow. I say also to let the Military man this defensive line. Though in a western nation this amount of militarisation isn&#8217;t going to be taken likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/comment-page-1/#comment-243375</link>
		<dc:creator>walterc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/12/14-billion-border-securitystimulus-bucks-for-mexico-but-what-about-our-fence/#comment-243375</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the descriptions/analysis TK.

Would it help if we charged the fence with electricity?

At a minimum, a double fence with sensors and roving patrols is what&#039;s needed.

And since we are at war and the terrorists are teaming up with Mexican drug runners,  towers with machine guns isn&#039;t a bad idea either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the descriptions/analysis TK.</p>
<p>Would it help if we charged the fence with electricity?</p>
<p>At a minimum, a double fence with sensors and roving patrols is what&#8217;s needed.</p>
<p>And since we are at war and the terrorists are teaming up with Mexican drug runners,  towers with machine guns isn&#8217;t a bad idea either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

