Showdown in Berkeley and the Harry Reid chicken-out; Update: Morning mayhem in Berkeley; Update: Still trashing the Marines; Update: Reid speaks

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 12, 2008 08:27 AM

Update 5:33pm Eastern. A picture that will warm your heart. The pro-troops protesters this morning in Berkeley. Video here.

1berkfeb.jpg

Update 5:28pm Eastern. A Hill staffer sends the following partial transcript of Harry Reid’s comments to a reporter on the siege at Berkeley:

QUESTION: Do you think the statement made by the Berkeley City Council was appropriate? What should the response of the United States Senate be?

REID: To be very honest with you, I don’t know what the Berkeley City Council said. I have enough trouble keeping track of the Las Vegas City Council, so I’m sorry…

QUESTION: They said the Marines were not welcome in Berkeley.

REID: Well, if they said that, I’m disappointed. The Marine Corps should be welcome anyplace in the United States.

Update 1:49pm Eastern. Thought you’d like to see this sign from the Pinkos as they amass in front of Berkeley’s City Hall (hat tip – William Amos; source: CNN). No need to question their patriotism anymore. They have none:

1pinksign.jpg

Update 11:14am. Just received word from Cat Moy with Move America Forward of a physical confrontation by the Code Pinkos against pro-troops supporters. Cat writes:

Berkeley Police Watch “Peace” Freaks attack Patriots

Berkeley erupted in violence Tuesday morning when the Communist, terrorist-supporting anti-war group crossed into Martin Luther King Park and assaulted pro-troop individuals. Riot police stood by, but did not stop the assaults. Police agencies did not respond to calls for help.

Move America Forward, the nation’s largest pro-troop organization, received permits from the City of Berkeley to hold a daylong demonstration in MLK park against the City Council who passed three outrageous resolutions calling U.S. Marines “unwanted intruders.”

“It is mayhem on here,” MAF communications director Danny Gonzalez said from the park early Tuesday morning.

Code Pink was permitted for across the street. The two sides were to stay separated, according to rules laid down by the city. But the city has a history of giving Code Pink special preference. The City Council gave free parking permits and a free noise permit to the radical group, which has helped fund terrorist families in Iraq with a $600,000 gift. MAF Exeutive Director Catherine Moy attempted to get help from the Berkeley police as the mayhem unfolded, but an officer hung up on Moy. Moy asked the California Highway Patrol to help in the emergency, but the CHP refused. “I have never in my life experienced such inaction in the face of an emergency, “Moy said. “I will ask the Federal Government to investigate, as well as the State Attorney General. It is one thing to give free parking places to the City Council’s special interest anti-war groups, it is another to take sides and endanger the lives of others.”

Move America Forward and other pro-troop organizations will stand in support of the Marines all day Tuesday until they can enter the City Council chambers to address the City Council.

***
Today is the Move America Forward protest against the Berkeley City Council for its discriminatory anti-Marine measures. Check here for details if you’re in the area and able to attend. The council meets tonight at 7pm to consider retreat resolutions. It’s going to be one for the history books. The SFChron says it’s “expected to be its largest and most raucous protest in years as hundreds of demonstrators from near and far pour into town for Tuesday night’s City Council showdown over a Marine Corps recruiting station downtown.”

You’ll be very interested to know what happened back here in Washington last night related to the Berkeley debacle. And protesters in Berkeley might want to bring a couple rubber chickens as a reminder. As you’ll recall, Sen. Jim DeMint moved to deny Berkeley millions of dollars worth of earmarks to the troop-bashing city. This would have put Democrats on record: For the moonbats or for the troops?

Well, Harry Reid managed to stymie movement on DeMint’s measure. He used a rare maneuver to delay the vote until later today–giving the council a chance to backtrack and giving cover to the Dems. A Senate staffer told me: “It’s truly incredible that they went to such great lengths to avoid having to deal with this.”

Par for the course for the Move On-bought-and-owned Dems.

The Hill reports:

Senate Democrats left two days of legislative business officially open last week, hobbling GOP efforts to bring up a bill punishing a liberal California city for scolding Marine Corps recruiters.

Republicans said Democrats clearly wanted to avoid being forced to choose between the Marine Corps or Berkeley, Calif., known for its liberalism and fervent anti-war positions.

Instead of adjourning at the end of a day as usual, the Senate “recessed” twice, a move that, under Senate rules, slows the process of adding new bills to the calendar. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) did not adjourn until last Friday, effectively pushing back floor consideration on the GOP bill until Tuesday — the same day that the city council is likely to tone down its call for Marine Corps recruiters to leave town.

“The only reason to recess is to block something, and the thing that got blocked by Reid’s stall tactic was the Semper Fi Act,” said spokesman Wesley Denton, referring to the bill introduced by his boss, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).

“Democrats have chosen not to defend the Marine Corps, but to pander to anti-war protesters and Berkeley officials that are actively trying to impede military recruitment.”

The recess move is highly unusual:

The process of recessing is very unusual in the 110th Congress. The only times the Senate went into recess were on Sept. 12 and before and after a number of quick “pro forma” sessions held late last year and in early January, in a tactic to keep President Bush from making recess appointments.

When the Senate adjourns, a legislative day officially comes to an end. To bypass committee consideration of a bill, a senator can request that a bill be placed on the Senate calendar two legislative days after it is introduced.

Once a measure is on the calendar, a senator can request the Senate to approve a bill by unanimous consent, or force at least one member to object to its passage.

But on Feb. 6 and Feb. 7, Reid and Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) closed the chamber’s doors by recessing until the next day, a move that, unlike adjourning, does not change the legislative day.

That tactic effectively delayed an effort by DeMint and five other conservatives to bring forward a bill, introduced on Feb. 6, that would strip Berkeley of $2 million worth of earmarks inserted into the $516 billion omnibus spending bill Bush signed into law at the end of 2007. According to three GOP aides, DeMint signaled on Feb. 6 that he would request that the bill be placed on the legislative calendar before the decision was made to recess, rather than adjourn, for the night.

“Berkeley needs to learn that their actions have consequences,” DeMint said.

Indeed, they are slow learners.

***

FYI, Sens. Boxer and Feinstein and Rep. Barbara Lee are the sponsors of the earmarks targeted by DeMint. Where do they stand on the Berkeley controversy? For the Marines or for the troop-bashers.

They are standing in defense of…their earmarks.

Code Pink camped out at City Hall last night reports the SF Chron:

About 60 activists, including a few of the tree-sitters from UC Berkeley’s Oak Grove, danced, sang, listened to jazz and drank carrot juice as they pitched their tents for the night.

“This is a great gift to us to be able to ignite a national debate,” said Medea Benjamin, Code Pink spokeswoman. “We’re drawing a line in the sand on Shattuck Avenue and saying the war stops here.”

Here’s the council agenda item:

From: Councilmembers Olds and Capitelli

Recommendation:

1) That the City Council, through adoption of this item, publicly differentiate between the City’s documented opposition to the unjust and illegal war in Iraq and our respect and support for those serving in the armed forces.

2) Rescind point 2 of Item 12, of the January 29, 2008 Berkeley City Council Agenda, “Marine Recruiting Office in Berkeley,” regarding communications with the Marine Recruiting Station in Berkeley.

Financial Implications: None

Contact: Betty Olds, Councilmember, District 6, 981-7160

Discussion probably won’t begin until around 9pm Pacific time, after such typically Berkeley resolution discussions as these:

15. Condemn Construction of Border Wall – United States and Mexico Border (PDF)

From: Councilmember Worthington

Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution condemning the construction of a border wall along the international boundary zone connecting the United States of Mexico and the United States of America.

Financial Implications: None

Contact: Kriss Worthington, Councilmember, District 7, 981-7170

16. Proclamation: February 2008 as Freedom to Marry Month (PDF)

From: Councilmembers Worthington and Moore

Recommendation: Adopt a Proclamation declaring February 2008 as Freedom to Marry Month in the City of Berkeley and urge the state to end discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people and their families by removing references to sex and gender as eligibility requirements for a civil marriage license and enacting a law providing for equal access to marriage and all of its legal benefits and obligations by all persons, regardless of sex, gender identity or sexual orientation.

Financial Implications: None

Contact: Kriss Worthington, Councilmember, District 7, 981-7170

17. Letter To Canadian Officials Requesting Sanctuary For U.S. War Resisters (PDF)

From: Councilmember Worthington

Recommendation: Send a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Diana Finley and Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion requesting that the government of Canada establish provisions to provide sanctuary for U.S. military service members who are living in Canada to resist fighting in the Iraq War.

Financial Implications: See report

Contact: Kriss Worthington, Councilmember, District 7, 981-7170

Posted in: Berkeley

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Berkeley Update: Dingy Harry blocks the DeMint defunding
  2. Right Voices » Blog Archive » Berkeley Showdown In The Senate, Starring Harry Reid, Watch It Play Out…
  3. Dingy Harry Blocks Berkeley Defunding Act : American Pundit
  4. Dingy Harry Blocks Berkeley Defunding Act : American Pundit
  5. Dingy Harry Blocks Berkeley Defunding Act : American Pundit
  6. Move America Forward And Code Pinkos Face Off In Berkeley « Nice Deb
  7. Sierra Faith
  8. silent E speaks - Conservatively Speaking from Western Waukesha County » The Berkeley Brawl
  9. Recess Appointments « Wilson Fu
  10. Hang Right Politics » Moral Relevatism Knows No Shame
  11. Knee Deep in the Hooah!
  12. The Radio Patriot
  13. Solomonia
  14. A NEWT ONE
  15. Pro-American Demonstrators Assaulted in Berkeley As Police Merely Watch | OpenMarket.org
  16. Life in 3D » Berkley Update via Michelle Malkin
  17. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Evil in low places, Mayor of Berkeley California snub our Marines again.
  18. Theodore's World
  19. Wake up America-
  20. Rosemary's Thoughts
  21. Grizzly Groundswell » Sacred Ground UPDATED
  22. Yankeemom
  23. Grizzly Groundswell » Berkeley Protest(s) and updates
  24. Gratitude #5 Semper Fi « Love, Mom (Notes from the fridge)
  25. A Tale of Two Cities « Love, Mom (Notes from the fridge)
  26. Berkeley vs USMC: Face off in Berkeley and Harry Reid’s two step

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #242572
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:31 am, Trubble said:

    What’s the fine print preventing Bush from making recess appointments during the recess? At the very least he should be able to make the Dems choose between the appointments and stalling this vote.

  2. #242575
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:35 am, MTNEER said:

    Has the senate accomplished anything under Harry Reid?

  3. #242578
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:39 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    “The only reason to recess is to block something, and the thing that got blocked by Reid’s stall tactic was the Semper Fi Act,” said spokesman Wesley Denton, referring to the bill introduced by his boss, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).

    WOW, JUST WOW. How does this fit in with, “we support the troops but not the war”?

    They are standing in defense of…their earmarks.

    Duh statement of the day. Well, so far. The day has just started.

  4. #242579
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:39 am, zorro said:

    Thanks for the detailed update Michelle. If only the main stream media would make note of these maneuvers.

    I am calling Arlen the Specter’s office this morning, (after they wake up and answer the phone) to request that he speak to this issue today so at least the few who watch CSPAN will hear of this outrage.

  5. #242581
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:43 am, shimauma2 said:

    The recess move is highly unusual:

    And a waste of my tax dollars! gee, I wish I could just cut out of work when I wanted. This whole system rankles the hell out of me, they get to waste time and money to NOT show their true colors. I said it once and I’ll say it forever: Public “Servants” my butt!

  6. #242583
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:53 am, tre said:

    So the “Wrong” (oops, I mean “Left”) are showing they are not only anti-war, but anti-military and anti-American.

    I have long thought, one doesn’t have to support the war, but one should always support the troops.

  7. #242584
    On February 12th, 2008 at 8:53 am, jrlingreenbay said:

    hobbling GOP efforts to bring up a bill punishing a liberal California city for scolding Marine Corps recruiters

    Their actions were hardly a ’scolding’.
    They denegrated and demeaned the United States Marines and called them unwelcome intruders. They also gave preferential treatment to an uber-liberal protest group which sought to silence the Marines by protesting in front of their place of business in a council-appointed parking spot right at their door.

    “Scolding” makes it sound as if the Marines did something wrong.

  8. #242588
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:00 am, aunursa said:

    It’s good to see that my college town can waste its citizens time and resources delving into national and international policy as a result of having solved crime, homelessness, poverty, and other civic problems that plagued the community the last time I visited (summer 2007).

  9. #242590
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:03 am, cpodug said:

    The only question I might have is when do they have any time for city business? With the fullness of their agenda, does the city just drift along?

    Oops – never mind – that was a rhetorical question. ;)

  10. #242594
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:08 am, BobK said:

    Michelle,

    I knew that you would be covering this. You have always been there for us Vets and our active duty.

    As for the jerks on the left coast – may the fleas of a 1000 camels infest your arm pits – um, if they haven’t already.

  11. #242596
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:09 am, ACHefty said:

    If they want to talk about an “illegal” war, they should consider the legality of their dealings in foreign affairs. It strikes me that a city government should not attempt to undermine the efforts of the state or federal government. A city council is just that — a CITY council. Enough about desertion sanctuary and border disputes. Get to the job of city government.

    And, no, Doug, that is not a rhetorical question. It’s a legitimate one. Sadly, these cowards in Berkeley would rather tell everyone else their business without getting their own house in order first.

  12. #242597
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:10 am, TexasTiger said:

    From the Life Imitates Monty Python Department:

    From: Councilmembers (Francis?) Worthington and (Stan?) Moore

    Recommendation: Adopt a Proclamation declaring February 2008 as Freedom to Marry Month in the City of Berkeley and urge the state to end discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people and their families by removing references to sex and gender as eligibility requirements for a civil marriage license and enacting a law providing for equal access to marriage and all of its legal benefits and obligations by all persons, regardless of sex, gender identity or sexual orientation.

    JUDITH: I do feel, Reg, that any Anti-Imperialist group like ours must reflect such a divergence of interests within its power-base.

    REG: Agreed. Francis?

    FRANCIS: Yeah. I think Judith’s point of view is very valid, Reg, provided the Movement never forgets that it is the inalienable right of every man–

    STAN: Or woman.

    FRANCIS: Or woman… to rid himself–

    STAN: Or herself.

    FRANCIS: Or herself.

    REG: Agreed.

    FRANCIS: Thank you, brother.

    STAN: Or sister.

    FRANCIS: Or sister. Where was I?

    REG: I think you’d finished.

    FRANCIS: Oh. Right.

    REG: Furthermore, it is the birthright of every man–

    STAN: Or woman.

    REG: Why don’t you shut up about women, Stan. You’re putting us off.

    STAN: Women have a perfect right to play a part in our movement, Reg.

    FRANCIS: Why are you always on about women, Stan?

    STAN: I want to be one.

    REG: What?

    STAN: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me ‘Loretta’.

    REG: What?!

    LORETTA: It’s my right as a man.

    JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?

    LORETTA: I want to have babies.

    REG: You want to have babies?!

    LORETTA: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.

    REG: But… you can’t have babies.

    LORETTA: Don’t you oppress me.

    REG: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! Where’s the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!

    LORETTA: [crying]

    JUDITH: Here! I– I’ve got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can’t actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody’s fault, not even the Romans’, but that he can have the right to have babies.

    FRANCIS: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.

    REG: What’s the point?

    FRANCIS: What?

    REG: What’s the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can’t have babies?!

    FRANCIS: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.

    REG: Symbolic of his struggle against reality.

  13. #242598
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:13 am, Larraby said:

    The only thing missing from the Berkley city council agenda was the usual antiIsrael, proHamas/Hezbollah resolution that is a staple of just about every Berkeley council meeting or Berkeley protest. How did the council members forget to throw in at least one proForma antiIsrael resolution? Maybe the fine Colombian made the council members momentarily lose their train of thought.

  14. #242602
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:19 am, cpodug said:

    You’re right, AC – every time I have to drive through Berkeley, it strikes me as one of the dirtiest, dingiest places on earth. The streets are narrow, and crowded. I have more respect for UCB than I have for the city in which it sits. I tend to avoid it as much as possible, to the point where I will go 20 miles out of the way rather than pass through it.

    If the council really had pride in their city, rather than pride in their past as the “Home of the Free Speech Movement” and the sit-ins and love-ins of the hippie culture, they would make it a priority to take care of the place.

    I really feel sorry for the police and firemen up there. Every call they go on has to be measured against a political yardstick.

  15. #242607
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:30 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    “This is a great gift to us to be able to ignite a national debate,” said Medea Benjamin, Code Pink spokeswoman. “We’re drawing a line in the sand on Shattuck Avenue and saying the war stops here.”

    This group brings out the worst in me. Their initial infelicitous comment were something to the affect of “we are protecting the health and safety of our youth” and now they have graduated to stopping the war. Newsflash: You don’t have that kind of power… Besides, this isn’t even about them anymore. This is about the City council (and what has to be the height of stupidity)drafting a letter calling our troops unwelcome and uninvited intruders and granting a parking permit for these saggy hags to harass the Marines while they do important work. We’ll see who effectively drew the line in the sand.

  16. #242608
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:31 am, southsideironworks said:

    I have to laugh, the Code Pinko’s believe that they are somehow relevant in this debate. The only debate here are the special privileges the Berkeley City Council EXTENDED to Code Pink. Through their actions, the Berkeley City Council became an active participant in the protest.

    The actions of the Berkeley City Council have impinged on the rights of the Marine Corps Recruiters, as well as those of potential recruits.

    Shame on Berkeley, take those earmarks back.

  17. #242609
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:31 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    was something

  18. #242612
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:35 am, Pulchritudinous Patriot said:

    Gawd, the rest of the agenda is just as awful as the resolution they passed.

    We should rescend the earmarks based on the entire liberality of the agenda alone.

    Lex Luthor, where are you with your plans? Hackensack?

  19. #242619
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:45 am, dan708 said:

    It’s just too bad that there is no Earmarks Anonymous for these Dem senators. They’re clearly addicted.

  20. #242620
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:48 am, J S Ragman said:

    If the Berkeley City Council would only pass a resolution calling on UBL to surrender it would solve alot of our problems.

    Then they could resolve to have OPEC lower the price of oil.

    And while they’re at it, they could pass resolutions demanding that Mexico and the Central American countries improve their economies.

    What with Code Pink throwing their weight behind these initiatives, the world is saved!

    Maybe I can get them to come to my town and draw a line around it, saying the war stops there, too.

    max sarc off/

  21. #242621
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:48 am, CarpiJugulum said:

    Let the 1.4 billion for mexicos southern boarder come from the city of Bezerkley. Seeing how they do not appreciate the military. They can also pack up and get the hell out of the United States and move to mexico.

    Henry Reid shows his true yellow colors with the pinkies. His disdain for the Military is also very disgraceful. Along with Boxer and Fienstien. They too can get the hell out of here.

    I for one am sick and tired of these lefties cutting down the military and American values in the name of being enlightened and progresive. I would like to put a military boot up their backside as they stumble over the boarder to their beloved cesspool of Mexico.

  22. #242625
    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:49 am, mattymatt10 said:

    My God. I thought City Councils were supposed to deal with city business. Besides allowing their sexually deviant population to marry, I don’t see how any of those resolutions actually deals with the city.

    The whole agenda smacks of self-righteous sanctimosity (not sure if that’s even a word, and that phrase might be redundant. My bad). It must be exhausting having the weight of the world on one’s shoulders every day.

  23. #242638
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:00 am, Barry F. said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 9:49 am, mattymatt10 said:

    My God. I thought City Councils were supposed to deal with city business.

    Nah. That only applies to other local governments, Matt. Why, if it weren’t for the Berkeley City Council, how could/would anything get done in the world?

    /sarcasm off

  24. #242650
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:10 am, radio relay said:

    Thus, the nation dances to the beat of the lunatic fringe…. aka democrats

    Can’t wait to turn it over to these clowns… Just for a “change”.

    May they get what they are asking for!!

    Too bad that the rest of us sane people will be dragged along in the same net.

  25. #242660
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:21 am, Ragspierre said:

    Always LOVE IT when the Dimocrates get to show how they support our troops…

    and fight for national security.

    Tell your friends and neighbors.

  26. #242663
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:22 am, ACHefty said:

    But the mentality across the nation is that only one man can make a difference — the one elected to the Oval Office. Well, I have news for you. We must change the people roaming the halls of Congress, the state legislatures, and the city and county offices.

    Too many people cry “throw the bums out — except my bum.”

    Enough already!

  27. #242666
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:29 am, cpodug said:

    I refuse to vote for an incumbent, just on general principles – and my conscience

  28. #242669
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:29 am, Dimsdale said:

    To TexasTiger:

    From the Life Imitates Monty Python Department:

    As a long time fan of MPFC, the geniuses of Python were able to use satire/sarcasm/ humor to make a point.

    The Berkeley City Council is quite serious about this seditious crap.

    I think even the Pythons would be surprised to see one of their farcical skits exceeded by reality.

    It makes you want to cut Berkeley completely off the American continent and set it adrift in the Pacific to match its intellectual drift. The space left behind would make a nice pond.

    And I say this living in Massachusetts, knowing full well that the liberal flotsam and jetsam here will soon follow suit.

  29. #242671
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:32 am, Yashmak said:

    Doesn’t their city council have any. . you know. . CITY issues to deal with? They can really afford to waste time with things like condemning the border wall?!?

  30. #242672
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:32 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    To paraphrase Jerry Reed:

    They get the gold mine, we get the shaft. It all sounds kinda funny but it hurts too much to laugh…

  31. #242675
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:38 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Reid and all liberals have one thing in common: no spine.

    Truly, seriously, Reid is a despicable boor.

  32. #242686
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:52 am, Ceroth said:

    When, O When, can we question these Reids and the Berkeley buffoons patriotism?

  33. #242691
    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:57 am, MrVIBEMAN said:

    Gawd! I can’t stand my Illinois Senator Durbin! I wonder how much in kickbacks and favors he gets every year by doing crap like this for Reid, Pelosi, and that ilk. Everytime I hear his name it’s attached to something shady or unethical like this.

    I pray to God that Illinois people wake up one day and he gets the boot.

  34. #242696
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:00 am, netdude5 said:

    Now I DO question the Democrats patriotism.

  35. #242704
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:06 am, Svet said:

    Par for the course for the Dhimmi-Crat Party. Sad that we live in a time where one of the political parties displays open contempt for our troops. Sometimes I wonder how anyone can vote for them. Then I realize they’ve made a sizeable number of citizens into wards of the state who want the government to help them have a bowel movement. That’s been so successful that they’re after illegals to put them on the government teat.

    Treasonous bastards.

  36. #242708
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:10 am, JohnnyD said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:32 am, Yashmak said:
    Doesn’t their city council have any. . you know. . CITY issues to deal with?

    Sure they do. They handle parking issues and…oh wait!

    Never Mind!

    /sarc off

  37. #242709
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:13 am, traveler49 said:

    Mom: Look Billy, there’s a marine.

    Billy: Should I spit on him mommy?

    Mom: No, let’s wait for the other protesters to back us up.

  38. #242712
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:15 am, JohnnyD said:

    And btw, will the voters finally see just how dishonest the Dhimmicrats are?

    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:29 am, cpodug said:
    I refuse to vote for an incumbent, just on general principles – and my conscience

    I’ve been doing the same thing for years now. But in Maryland, I have a hard time making a dent. One of these days, I pray, I will not be so alone.

  39. #242717
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:19 am, mngirl said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 10:57 am, MrVIBEMAN said:
    Gawd! I can’t stand my Illinois Senator Durbin! I wonder how much in kickbacks and favors he gets every year by doing crap like this for Reid, Pelosi, and that ilk. Everytime I hear his name it’s attached to something shady or unethical like this.

    I pray to God that Illinois people wake up one day and he gets the boot.

    I have to agree Mr. Vibeman; Durbin is pretty tough to watch. There is a good guy running against him this year right? A doctor who is first time politician though. What are his chances? It would be wonderful to end Durbin’s run.

  40. #242726
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:28 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    What frauds these Code Pinkos are… they are the ones assaulting people while the “law” in Berkeley looks the other way.

  41. #242729
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:31 am, J S Ragman said:

    Berkeley erupted in violence Tuesday morning when the Communist, terrorist-supporting anti-war group crossed into Martin Luther King Park and assaulted pro-troop individuals. Riot police stood by, but did not stop the assaults. Police agencies did not respond to calls for help.

    Please tell me somebody had a video camera.

  42. #242732
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:33 am, Irish Rose said:

    Cat,

    Oh behalf of my Marine who is serving aboard the USS Nimitz, thank you.

    I wish that I could stand with you, but I’m halfway across the country. Please do whatever you have to do short of violence, to make sure that these traitors do not have the victory today!

    I salute all of you and will continue to prayerfully monitor the situation throughout the day.

    IR

  43. #242747
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Brian72 said:

    The U.S. Military is going to have to invade and occupy Berkley, to bring it back into the Union.

    All Code Pink personnel are to be arrested by MP’s on sight. Then fly them all to Daytona Beach this weekend where they will be forced to endure the patriotic and global warming-inducing Daytona 500, national anthem and flyover included.

    That’s only the first stop on their trip. Next is the short hop from Daytona to Club Gitmo, where they will meet many like minded people.

    Do you think traitor-pink and detainee-orange are a fashion clash, or a good match?

  44. #242753
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:47 am, old trooper said:

    So, for the record, Code Pink Vigilantes
    have support of both the “useful idiots” on the City Council, the useless Mayor, the Berkeley Police sat on their hands, the CHP just watched unlawful assembly, assault and mayhem like it was not their problem?

    Someone on the Left Coast has some explaining to do!

    I just wrote a check to Move America Forward for their support. It will be mailed today.

    I expected Harry Reid and “Dick” Durbin to act in support of the Code Pink Punks and Vandals. I reckon that the backlash will be ugly for those dolts.

  45. #242757
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:49 am, Perfesser said:

    What an amazingly dangerous precedent. In America, we witness a Government body of elected officials openly give a political group preference – to the point of special privileges and use of violence to silence opposing voices. I must have awakened in the Twilight Zone or the Mao Revolution…

  46. #242758
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:51 am, katieanne said:

    I have been totally disgusted with Arnold for his silence in this entire mess. This was his response to an email I sent him:

    Thank you for writing to Governor Schwarzenegger and sharing your concerns regarding the resolution passed by the Berkeley City Council concerning the Marine Recruiting Office. Government works best when people like you add their voice to important issues.

    Decision-making authority for the matter you describe rests entirely with the Berkeley City Council. The Governor values your perspective and encourages you to share your thoughts with them. The Berkeley City Council can be reached at:

    2180 Milvia Street
    Berkeley, CA 94704
    (510) 981-6900

    Again, thank you for writing on this important matter.

    Sincerely,

    Maral Mata
    Office of Constituent Affairs

    I wonder if there will be any response when law enforcement, in a city in the state he governs, refuses to come to the aid of citizens who support the military.

    Silence in this is appalling. You either support the troops or you don’t. We should be hearing from all the politicians in California.

  47. #242759
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:51 am, JohnnyD said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Brian72 said:
    Do you think traitor-pink and detainee-orange are a fashion clash, or a good match?

    Of course not Brian. It’s the new “black”.

  48. #242766
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:54 am, zorro said:

    Berkeley erupted in violence Tuesday morning when the Communist, terrorist-supporting anti-war group crossed into Martin Luther King Park and assaulted pro-troop individuals. Riot police stood by, but did not stop the assaults. Police agencies did not respond to calls for help.

    This is a total outrage. No police protection against assault? This is an un-American activity by a US city. Who gave the order to the police not to respond? What’s next, City of Berkeley approved hit men?

    This is a hate crime and a violation of MAF’s civil rights. The FBI need to be involved now.

    Harry Reid, allow the Senate to vote on Sen. DeMint’s legislation. Do it now.

  49. #242773
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:57 am, MNUSMCDavid said:

    The visceral Marine in me can only shake his head and wish he was in that melee. I cannot believe I feel so willing to strike out physically. I wish I could say I’m ashamed, but I’m not. Not to worry, my objectivist libertarian side will win out, for now.

  50. #242775
    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:58 am, Brian72 said:

    I’m envisioning pink and orange striped prison outfits for them. They can hold their stupid vigils all they want in Club Gitmo, while the U.S. Marine Corps continues to protect them from the terrorists.

    I have to admit my idea is somewhat selfish, I would love to see that!

  51. #242781
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Brian72 said:

    The Obama ‘08 Campaign could help the CodePinkos out with decoration ideas for their cells, like this Che Cuban flag.

  52. #242782
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, 509th Bob said:

    Please have the Move America Forward videotape, photograph, and otherwise fully document the assaults and the police inactivity. If what you have described is accurate, the police have just committed a federal civil rights violation. If the City Council gave orders to the police to not act to protect the MAF supporters, they are members of the conspiracy. If the reports are true, this is what is known as “state action” discrimination. California, already bankrupt in so many ways, will be financially liable for Berkeley’s actions. So, in the end, SUE them!

  53. #242784
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, Brian72 said:

    This week on TLC, Extreme Commie-traitor Holding Cell Makeovers!

  54. #242790
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, Brian72 said:

    Trading Spaces. Hahaha!

  55. #242793
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:10 pm, Jim M. said:

    What hypocracy that an anti-war group is pro-violence. If they are not reluctant to engage in violence to achieve their goals, what difference is there between Code Pink and the military they seem to loathe? What they are telling the world that violent means are justified so long as it supports their agenda, but such means are not acceptable for causes they find unworthy.

    Truly amazing.

  56. #242799
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, tomk59 said:

    So the freak show is physically assaulting people while the police do nothing,huh? What a golden opportunity to kick ass and bust scumbags heads. Hope you folks are taking advantage of it.

  57. #242803
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    The Berkley Town Council Room might be a good back-up site for Yuca Mountain.

    It already puts out toxic emanantions.

  58. #242810
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, corona said:

    Uh, Mr. President – national guard?

  59. #242814
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, Pulchritudinous Patriot said:

    And the dried up bitter old hippies call the Marines terrorists?

  60. #242819
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, bear1909 said:

    The interesting trend in all of this is that the City Council screwed up in writing the letter as if it is unanimous or a majority opinion of Berkeley.

    DOH! It’s not. This could be the high water mark for Code Pink. They don’t speak for us.

    CODE PINK is the face of liberal fascism in America.

  61. #242830
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, billhedrick said:

    while I don’t put this past the pinks, I gotta think there were some harsh words exchanged before the incursion. Also I have trouble believing people as cowardly as the pinks would do more than passive aggressive assaults.

  62. #242849
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Fasternu 426 said:

    I wouldn’t put it past the emboldened code pinkos to do this at all. They have been given Carte Blanche to do whatever they please.

    Free speech only applies to Anti-American Speech. Show your patriotism by showing how much you hate America. I wonder how many Che flags/shirts were there?

  63. #242853
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:44 pm, bear1909 said:

    I have a civil rights/discrimination issue that a team of us were going to address the City Council about during the public comment period.

    But now that City Hall is going to be mobbed with the unwashed herd of Code Stink (who believe they speak for all of Berkeley).

    So our efforts to seek relief, as advocates for a Berkeley family, on this matter— well, these just have to wait because, once again, Berkeley considers itself an entity separate from the United States.

    Good luck with that. Cha-CHING!

  64. #242858
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Brian72 said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, bear1909 said:

    CODE PINK is the face of liberal fascism in America.

    Yes. Code Pink is also the face of stupid idiot communist hippie morons in America.

    I watched a House Armed Services Committee hearing a few months ago. The witness was Lt. Gen. Martin Dempsey, US Army.

    The General was giving a very detailed and sober assessment of the Iraqi Security Forces, their training and progress toward independent operations. These are the Congressional hearing where you can learn a lot.

    Sitting in the Peanut Gallery right behind the General, where the C-SPAN cameras had them in the frame when showing the general speak, was Medea Benjamin and some cohorts from Code Pink, wearing the stupid pink construction paper crown hats. When the General said anything positive, they shook their heads in the negative. When he detailed the challenges, or a lefty Congress critter would spew DNC talking points at the General, they would nod in the positive. Eventually, they leaped to their feet and yelled their idiocy, disrupting the hearing, as they always do. They were escorted out by the Capitol Police, but sure enough, the next hearing on the war I saw there they were again, right in the camera shot.

    The look on General Dempsey’s face said it all. Just pathetic, embarrassing, and unworthy of a Congressional hearing about our National Security. I felt his pain. Yet they return to the gallery time and time again.

  65. #242865
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, bear1909 said:

    Also I have trouble believing people as cowardly as the pinks would do more than passive aggressive assaults.

    there is a huge pro-code pink crowd here. most arent part of code pink. the attackers were male.

    also, the dynamics are such that the cops want to bust the “right wingers” not the lefties. the place is crawlin with ACLU.

    Code Pink has a lot of stealth fascist back up here.

    But they forgot one thing: the majority of Berkeleyans dont appreciate being spoken for by a “non-profit”.

  66. #242867
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Brian72 said:

    Also, the Democrat Chairman of these committees always make a big deal about throwing them out, “You won’t disrupt MY hearing! Get them out of here!”.

    Yet they always manage to get the best seats in the House, right in the C-SPAN shot the next time.

    These people are tied with the Democrat Party. Let’s remember that in November.

  67. #242871
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, JohnnyD said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, Brian72 said:
    Yet they return to the gallery time and time again.

    You just have to wonder where these morons get the money to support these forays into the halls of Congress. Do they actually think they can affect the outcome of testimony by being visible and loud? Rhetorically asked of course. That is the problem…they beLIEve in their demented world view.

  68. #242883
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, Ragspierre said:

    It may be time to file a federal civil rights action against the police agencies in these jurisdictions.

    I will help.

  69. #242884
    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, Brian72 said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, JohnnyD said:

    You just have to wonder where these morons get the money to support these forays into the halls of Congress.

    I’ve got a one word answer for you, DEMOCRATS.

  70. #242894
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

    On February 12th, 2008 at 11:19 am, mngirl said:

    There is a good guy running against him this year right? A doctor who is first time politician though. What are his chances? It would be wonderful to end Durbin’s run.

    I think his name is Steve Sauerberg. I met him at a Laura Ingraham book signing. He seems like a Professional, well informed, dedicated conservative. Not sure what his chances are, but probably not real good in a liberal state like this.

    I don’t know how Durbin keeps getting re-elected. 14 years in the House, and we’re coming up on the end of his second term in the Senate. He’s like the crapweasel poster-boy.

  71. #242897
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, Brian72 said:

    It just occurred to me that this tactic for liberals is not new.

    Before Operation Iraqi Freedom, the omni-present rabble rousers were the Jersey Girls.

    First Congressional hearings, then the 9-11 Comission hearings. All to embarrass the administrations of President Bush and Mayor Guiliani. Same act.

  72. #242899
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, traveler49 said:

    If the Berkeley police stand aside while conservative or pro troop demonstrators are being assaulted. Maybe the next time they should staple their protest signs to baseball bats.

  73. #242902
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, bear1909 said:

    Free speech only applies to Anti-American Speech. Show your patriotism by showing how much you hate America. I wonder how many Che flags/shirts were there?

    and the number of kefiyas or whatever those Palestinian rags are called that people wrap around their faces to “protect” their identities.

    it is chic in B-town to wear that garbage.

    every lefty issue u can think of is tied to the Code Pink bandwagon.

    it hasnt worked yet. this looks like a death rattle effort to get up off the deck. their own media isnt covering the war anymore…but they are going to cover the federal funding getting pulled.

    this could bode well for securing the borders….”Sanctuary” cities could lose federal funding…..obey federal laws or lose your funding.

    here in Berkeley, the City would say “Oh it’s no big deal. We’ll just raise property taxes on the real terrorists- homeowners.” That’s what the liberal fascists like to call all property owners, just because there are people who became homeless somewhere else and then moved to Berkeley and become part of the political machinery here.

  74. #242915
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:09 pm, Brian72 said:

    Bear1909, sound like you are an underground pro-America insurgent leader there in the Berserkley area.

    Be careful, bro!

  75. #242916
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Bear:

    Doing his part to keep Berkley safe for the rest of us. GOD Bless him!

  76. #242935
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, bear1909 said:

    #74: This kind of hubris is going to get some of these demagogues here sacked. The Mayor might be goin to court over this. And his whole political career is going to boil down to four words: Listened to Code Pink.

    #75: Soap! It’s a small one. But there are 1000s of us here in Berkeley.

  77. #242945
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, cpodug said:

    Bear – got your back down here in Stark country

  78. #242947
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, J S Ragman said:

    I thought Bear was the bay area commandante of the Malkin Six.

  79. #242955
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Radiojoe1470 said:

    You know the phrase I love in that Berkeley agenda?

    Financial Implications: None

    Wanna bet?

  80. #242958
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, MDH3 said:

    the war stops here

    Sure, Medea. Unless you and your band of bra-eschewing sisters happen to want to start some mess with people who don’t agree with you. Then it’s okay to get physical, right?

    Hypocrites.

  81. #242971
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, jcflindsay said:

    During WWII, the French called them enemy collaborators and dealt with them accordingly.

  82. #242984
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:46 pm, Brian72 said:

    If Berserkely Democrats are going to suffer consequences over supporting Code Stupid, then the RNC should damn well make this a national issue in November. Hang Code Stupid around the necks of all these uber-libs running for re-election, the Dem Presidential candidates, and especially the so-called “Blue Dog Dems” down here in Dixie. They will have to distance themselves from their own Speaker, or run with Code Stupid in Dixie, which means you might as well not run.

    They made this sandwich, now make them take a big bite!

  83. #242995
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, 509th Bob said:

    Brian72, #82, you are absolutely right. How about it Michelle? We don’t have access to significant voices in Congress, could you suggest this to someone?

  84. #242999
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, mojoe said:

    JOIN CODE PINK
    Travel to protected lands
    Meet people trying to live their lives
    AND ANNOY THEM

  85. #243001
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:57 pm, Brian72 said:

    Thanks Bob. Might I venture a guess that Uncle Sam talked you into jumping out of perfectly good airplanes?

  86. #243007
    On February 12th, 2008 at 1:58 pm, right_on said:

    That tactic effectively delayed an effort by DeMint and five other conservatives to bring forward a bill…

    Don’t you just love the Democrat’s highly touted “bi-partisanism?”

    The liberal leadership, both in Berkeley, and in the US houses, are going to be responsible for the coming deaths, and injuries of the protestors (on either side.)

    I have NEVER seen, in my years in local law enforcement, police officers fail to protect anyone who was attacked. If this reported non-action by the BPD, and CHP is proven to be true, the heirarchy of those “law enforcement (or maybe in this case, law enfarcement) agencies” should be sacked IMMEDIATELY for issuing orders contrary to public safety. That they told their charges to do nothing is outrageous, and yes, un-American!!!

  87. #243014
    On February 12th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Thought you’d like to see this sign from the Pinkos as they amass in front of Berkeley’s City Hall

    Nope, I could have done without the pics much like I could do without the pinko’s! :lol:

  88. #243016
    On February 12th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, William Amos said:

    There is also a disgusting video of them on the CNN site but I cant seem to get a link to it to work

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Berkeley vs. John Yoo

August 18, 2009 09:22 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Bastards: Vandals strike at Berkeley Marine recruiting center again

March 20, 2009 11:31 AM by Michelle Malkin

143 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Plus: Anti-war thugs plan protests tomorrow.

Berkeley libs fight over nuclear-free-zone law

December 5, 2008 05:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

70 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Code Pink evacuates from Berkeley

October 26, 2008 01:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Going, going, gone.

Some news to cheer you up

September 25, 2008 10:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Victory.

Comic relief: The Berkeley tree-sitters finally come down

September 9, 2008 05:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

74 Comments | 1 Trackback

End of the occupation. (Photo credit: Protest Shooter)

Appeasing the Berkeley tree-sitting trespassers…with energy bars

July 9, 2008 09:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Beyond parody, continued.


Categories: Berkeley



JustOneMinute

» Stay Classy, Ezra!

HotAir GreenRoom