Stimulus-palooza: The first wave is done

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 13, 2008 03:59 PM

President Bush signed the economic stimulus package this afternoon. Bipartisanship reigns. Whoopee. The White House transcript is here. Raise your hand if you’re not breaking out the champagne. The lard-up was not as bad as it could have been. But the fundamentals of stimulus-palooza were wrong at the start and wrong at the signing.

Borrow and spend may be good politics, but it is bad policy. Hillary wins. Fiscal responsibility loses. And you can be assured: The second tranche is coming.

Not to mention the $1.4 billion stimulus package for Mexico and Central America that’s in the pipeline.

God save us from bipartisanship.

Posted in: Subprime crisis

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Bush Signs Larded-Up “Stimulus” Package That Discourages Work | OpenMarket.org
  2. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  3. Michelle Malkin » Stimulus-palooza: Here comes the next wave
  4. non-stock corporation

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, Pat said:

    I work with an office full of people who are right, left, and center. We never discuss politics, to keep the peace. But every person has said in the last week, “Oh, no, this bailout is terrible, it will bankrupt the country!”

    Bipartisanship of another stripe. Everyone hates it.

  2. #2
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, BOB said:

    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:02 pm, Pat said:
    I work with an office full of people who are right, left, and center. We never discuss politics, to keep the peace. But every person has said in the last week, “Oh, no, this bailout is terrible, it will bankrupt the country!”

    Bipartisanship of another stripe. Everyone hates it.

    Do they realize how long the country has been bankrupt?

  3. #3
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, CarpiJugulum said:

    This is INSANE!!!!!!!! Here the MSM and the leading economist are saying reccession. So what does this RINO administration do. They waste what, $146 million on a buy the vote. Then they blow $1.4 billion in aid to a country that is laden with criminals.

    We are looking at a trillion dollar budget and they want to waste money. Looking at the options of the next administration, be it complete socialist or a wanna be socialist what are we to do?

    Thisis not only poor judgment buy congress to support this pork, but it is incompetance by this administration to do this.

    Being on a limited income of sorts do to certain reasons of health (of my making) I worry as to how I am to pay for these spend thrift plans next year and there after.

  4. #4
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:12 pm, emjem24 said:

    Pandering and bipartisanship go hand and hand. Just love it. How is that nice federal deficit going, boys? Any thoughts of guilt while you pander with non-existent money for votes you bought?

    Have you ever just considered letting people actually taking responsibility for their actions? Oh, no, we can’t have that. They may actually learn from the experience, never agree to another shady loan and then, dear God, what would happen to the banking, mortgage, and real estate industries? The horror.

  5. #5
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:13 pm, ajmontana said:

    Hand raised, high. that 1.4b has really hit a nerve with me as well as 1.4b other people I imagine.
    un-be-flippin-lievable

  6. #6
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:17 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    I would point out that both the Republican and Democrat politicians pushed this through. Frankly, they don’t want a recession before a Presidential election because the citizens of the USA, if their are any left with a brain, will turn them all out and start fresh.

    With Bush approval rating hovering at 30% and the Congress approval rating at 22%, 3 out or 4 American citizens are totally frustrated and angry with their politicians. This is why Obama is doing so well. I predict a major sea change in November. I just can’t predict the direction.

  7. #7
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

    I’ll get my check and cry all the way to the bank.

    Really.

    No sarcasm.

  8. #8
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, realitycheck said:

    I’m taking my cue from Jorge Bush and sending my rebate check directly to Felipe Calderon – with no strings attached.

    /sarc off

  9. #9
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, spidgy said:

    Just like the fans in Wrigley Field…

    Who’s going to SEND BACK their “rebate” check when it comes?

  10. #10
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:22 pm, graysonret said:

    Boy, this will go down in history as an example of how government messed up an economy. It isn’t the first time…and it won’t be the last, as long as politicians know that people will vote for them, when it comes to freebies and entitlements.

  11. #11
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, max said:

    Someone should put together a photo montage of the typical homes that are being threatened with foreclosure… my guess is that many look like these modern “McMansions,” complete with rococoo (sic?0 steps and columns, etc….

  12. #12
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    God save us from bipartisanship.

    AMEN Sister – AMEN

  13. #13
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, Barry F. said:

    Well, if they’re going to send me the money, I’ll take it. BUT, I won’t be stimulating the economy with any purchases from it.

    I will use it to decrease my current loan debt, because I’m going to have to pay it back in higher taxes later.

  14. #14
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:32 pm, Barry F. said:

    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:22 pm, graysonret said:

    Boy, this will go down in history as an example of how government messed up an economy. It isn’t the first time…and it won’t be the last, as long as politicians know that people will vote for them, when it comes to freebies and entitlements.

    Yes.

    And, those “people” may be easy but their votes don’t come cheap, grayson. We’re going to pay through the nose for this and other “stimulus” attempts by D.C.

  15. #15
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, blues said:

    As enraging,idiotic and insane as the bail-out is,and as counter-productive as our relationship with (our friend) Mexico is ,nothing is going to change until the voters finally wake up and throw out ALL of the incumbents.Good,bad,Liberal,Conservative,Republican ,Democrat-they ALL have to go.The conflict today is between thepeople and the government.The only power we have is the power to change our government by voting them out.The only way to keep the politicians responsive to the public’s wishes is through their fear of losing their cushy lifestyles.

  16. #16
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, blues said:

    I’m going to use my check as a down payment on something I can’t afford,and wait till the next bail-out.sarc.

  17. #17
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:43 pm, graysonret said:

    Barry, you better believe we’re going to pay through the nose for this. :) About the only practical thing to do with this so-called “rebate” is to bank it, collect interest, and turn it back in to the IRS when the taxes go up. Taxes will go up too. I know who the “rich” are…and they are us. That is, those who pay taxes. The ones who don’t pay taxes are going to get a “tax cut”. And to those who believe that they will get a tax break…Do I have a deal for you!!

  18. #18
    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, Barry F. said:

    I know who the “rich” are…and they are us. That is, those who pay taxes.

    Well, that isn’t exactly how I wanted to change tax brackets. ;-)

  19. #19
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, graysonret said:

    Me neither. But until we have a “Sweden” type of government, we’ll have more and more taken from us, all in the name of government compassion. It will end up with “womb to tomb” coverage, and some people, like us, will wonder…”What happened?”, as we ponder our new “Animal Farm” type of Constitution.

  20. #20
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:12 pm, unclemonkey said:

    Who’s going to SEND BACK their “rebate” check when it comes?

    Technically, we all are. Whatever the amount of your “rebate” you’ll have to pay that much more in federal taxes in 2009(or get that much less of a return as the case may be). All they’re even really doing is letting you borrow your’e own money(gee, who thinks it would be so popular if they had put it that way?).

    Question for those here who are smarter than I am. I live in Alabama, and the legislature is trying to pass a bill to keep the state from collecting state tax on those rebate checks; but won’t that $600 be income that I’ll have to report and eventually pay state tax on anyway?

  21. #21
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:15 pm, graysonret said:

    Won’t that be the ultimate irony…paying state taxes on your National government rebate check.

  22. #22
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:25 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I’m going to buy a house with my couple of hundred, and thanks to all of you for helping me pay the rest after Hillary digs in your pockets to cover the bad loan. Make that a really big house…

  23. #23
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, Barry F. said:

    the legislature is trying to pass a bill to keep the state from collecting state tax on those rebate checks; but won’t that $600 be income that I’ll have to report and eventually pay state tax on anyway?

    Ouch! An even bigger smack in the face – “Yeah! We’re gonna tax you for getting back some of your money the Feds are giving back to you, before they raise your taxes to get it back again.”

  24. #24
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    It will end up with “womb to tomb” coverage

    “birth to euthanasia” – they can save money on both ends.

  25. #25
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, Barry F. said:

    You know, we really shouldn’t be having so much fun poking fun at this “stimulus” crap.

    It is serious stuff, after all.

    We already work the first five months of they year, before we ever really start to realize any money for ourselves. Da*n. Now I’m really depressed. :-(

  26. #26
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:36 pm, graysonret said:

    Now, you probably won’t believe this…but I’ll tell you anyway. :) In the Middle Ages, the average peasant…you know, that downtrodden, abused farmer on Lord-owned land…only paid 60 days of work for his “slice” of the land. He worked for 60 days for the benefit of the aristocrat that owned the land, and the rest of the year was his. Look at us! We pay 5 months in “rent” for “our land” to the government. Now, who’s the winner?

  27. #27
    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:56 pm, Azygos said:

    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:25 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    I’m going to buy a house with my couple of hundred, and thanks to all of you for helping me pay the rest after Hillary digs in your pockets to cover the bad loan. Make that a really big house…

    Yup, Better make it a really big house because when the taxes go up again and those of us that pay them lose our homes we are going to need a place to live. I hope you like cats.

  28. #28
    On February 13th, 2008 at 6:16 pm, zorro said:

    God save us from bipartisanship.

    Amen.

    My check will go to the mortgage on the Florida condo.

  29. #29
    On February 13th, 2008 at 6:17 pm, Alphonse said:


    Spend Now While You Have It

    February 13, 2008, by Diana Furchtgott-Roth
    …President Bush signs a law that will increase your federal debt obligation, and that of every other American, by $500. It’s a $160 billion package of individual checks and business investment credits that’s supposed to reinvigorate the economy. For a family of four, that’s $2,000 in increased debt, far more than they will receive from Uncle Sam.

  30. #30
    On February 13th, 2008 at 6:23 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Getting our own money back is stimulus?

    Boy, is our system freaking upside down when the people feel privileged to get back what was already theirs! And, of course, the scum bags in DC will take all the credit and accept all the adulation…

  31. #32
    On February 13th, 2008 at 6:54 pm, right_on said:

    I wonder…weren’t almost all the Democrats on board with this “give-back?” I think they were…anyway, isn’t this an admission by the Dems that putting more money into the pockets of the American taxpayer (to spend themselves) bolsters the economy?

    How can they be for this, but against cutting taxes? It’s based on the same principle, isn’t it?

  32. #33
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:03 pm, amigoneus said:

    Whoa, whoa, whoa, right_on! Are you trying to use (heaven forbid??) logic! Now be a good little sheeple and be grateful to the big strong government for giving you money :)

    /sarc

  33. #34
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:04 pm, jenmom said:

    I thought I saw something on the news here in Oklahoma saying the state won’t tax this extra refund like they did a few years ago. Thanks Oklahoma..

    I just keep shaking my head at our government. They really are a bunch of idiots. Are there no decent people out there to run the government?

    And anyway – was this really needed? It won’t stimulate the economy. And for anyone who has studied basic economics, there are always ups and downs. It’s how the economy rights itself. Having the government step in only makes everything worse.

    It’s depressing really…..how badly the government seems to mess things up!

  34. #35
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:06 pm, amigoneus said:

    What are the 9 scariest words in the English language?

    “We’re from the government and we’re here to help.”

    Ee2k :(

  35. #36
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, amigoneus said:

    Doh! Ee2k – eeek :(

  36. #37
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:07 pm, cf said:

    On February 13th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, spidgy said:
    Just like the fans in Wrigley Field…
    Who’s going to SEND BACK their “rebate” check when it comes?

    Of course no one will send it back. It is going to the professional victims, illegal aliens, welfare deadbeats, and is being taken from those of us who pay the brunt of the taxes and won’t get a nickel because we work for a living.

  37. #38
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, Barry F. said:

    It will end up with “womb to tomb” coverage

    On February 13th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    “birth to euthanasia” – they can save money on both ends.

    “pre-abortion to euthanasia” – Got to get both abortive methods in there, infant and geriatric.

  38. #39
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:45 pm, Barry F. said:

    On February 13th, 2008 at 6:16 pm, zorro said:

    My check will go to the mortgage on the Florida condo.

    Want another Florida condo, zorro?

  39. #40
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:47 pm, zorro said:

    Want another Florida condo, zorro?

    Where is it? I like the NW Panhandle area.

  40. #41
    On February 13th, 2008 at 7:49 pm, Barry F. said:

    Not in the Panhandle. It is 5-10 minutes from Disney. I’m tired of hanging onto it.

    With the crap coming down the pike with whatever administration comes next, I meed to trim back on unnecessary things, like a vacation condo. Who can afford that, if my taxes are going to go up to pay for what GWB and the next administration are going to give away.

  41. #43
    On February 13th, 2008 at 9:37 pm, rightisright said:

    I’ll take my check and buy some 2nd amendment rights…thank you goes to my children, your children and all of our grand children for these bullets. Those rights may just come in handy(no doubt in my mind) and soon.

  42. #44
    On February 13th, 2008 at 11:26 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    It is all about politics and not the economy.

    Want to know how to get the economy going again? Offer a tax break for those investing 50,000 dollars or more in the stock market and a 10 percent tax break to any retail corporation (retail not meaning oil)that can increase their profit margin by 7 percent in 6 months. Want to see the economy take off? There’s one way.

  43. #45
    On February 14th, 2008 at 1:02 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

    Addendum, I meant gross revenue, not profit margin. Anyone can increase their “profit margin” by cooking the books.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Doug Ross @ Journal

» Barney Frank on the Rule of Law

Legal Insurrection

» David Frum Says We're To Blame
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook