Michelle Malkin » Barack Obama: Soul-fixer

Barack Obama: Soul-fixer

By Michelle Malkin • February 16, 2008 12:43 PM

Michelle Obama wants you to vote for Barack Obama because she thinks what America needs is a healer-in-chief. Via transcription from Ed Morrissey:

We have lost the understanding that in a democracy, we have a mutual obligation to one another — that we cannot measure the greatness of our society by the strongest and richest of us, but we have to measure our greatness by the least of these. That we have to compromise and sacrifice for one another in order to get things done. That is why I am here, because Barack Obama is the only person in this who understands that. That before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation.

Ed’s response:

Government doesn’t exist to save souls; it exists to ensure domestic tranquility and provide for the common defense. If I feel my soul needs saving, the very last place I’d look (in the US) for a savior would be Washington DC or Capitol Hill. I’ll trust God and Jesus Christ with my soul, and I’m not going to mistake Barack Obama for either one.

Amen to that.

***

When Republicans talk about broken souls in the context of civil society, the nutroots start screaming about the obliteration of the church-state line.

When the Obama campaign uses the same rhetoric to get him elected to the White House, everyone swoons.

***

Speaking of swooning, Dori Monson and James Taranto have been tracking Obama supporter fainting spells.

The McCain campaign needs to pass out nose plugs. The Obama campaign needs to pass out smelling salts.

Posted in: Barack Obama

Send to a Friend
Printer Friendly

comments (161)

trackbacks (33)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

#1

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:47 pm, JohnHolliday said:

That we have to compromise and sacrifice for one another in order to get things done.

As Winston Churchill said, “The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”
#2

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, TexasTiger said:

Soooooo Lil’ Micky Obama is renaming her husbands campaign vehicle the Soul Train?
#3

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

Obama=Jive Talker. For all this bluster and BS rhetoric about change, I’ve heard one too many invectives and disparaging remarks directed towards conservatives to believe this guy is a uniter. He’s just another slick tongued liberal, anointed by the media gods to be the next brand named politic figurehead whom they can rally around.

Obama, in my opinion, has a glossy appealing wrapper and it filled with crap!
#4

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, Larraby said:

Michelle Obama and Barack Obama both worked for the Chicago law firm of Sidley and Austin, one of America’s largest law firms that largely represents gian multinational corporation and large insurance companies and banks. The law firm’s litigation department, which is well known for its excellence, generally defends corporations, including nationally prominent banks and insurance companies. There is nothing wrong with this of course but it does point out the sanctimony of Team Obama. Michelle Obama left the law firm to take a job for a huge Chicago hospital with a salary of $250,000.00. It is not as if the Obamas are operating a clinic in a poor neighborhood of Chicago giving out free breakfast to the kiddies. They may talk about “the least of us” but they sure don’t want to spend Monday through Friday with the poorest people. Much more fun and profitable to spend your time with corporate lawyers from Harvard.
#5

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, Lindsay said:

Oprah said to vote for him…isn’t that enough? Sadly, for some, that is why they are voting for the empty suit.

I want to know what he will bring to the table other than crack pipe dreams.

I possibly wasn’t paying attention, but what does he say about radical Islam?
#6

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:52 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

I have to say…

That picture of Obama in Priests Vestments is just downright creepy!

*ugh*
#7

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, zorro said:

Ed’s response to Michelle Obama’s idiotic statement is all one can say! So, to quote Michelle Malkin, Amen to that!
#8

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Lindsay said:

One thing I find as disturbing as his vagueness on issues is the mission statement of his church:
http://www.tucc.org/about.htm
#9

On February 16th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, ThackerAgency said:

Why wasn’t he dressed up like Mohammed (complete with 9 year old bride)? If we have to be sensitive to each other, wouldn’t that be more appropriate? Show solidarity with the Muslims (like Obama’s father).

Anti-Christ anybody? Sign of the end times anybody? You might want to get the dust off the Bible and redeem your poor soul (like the song says).

Dust on the Bible
Dust on the Holy Word
The words of all our prophets
And the sayings of our Lord

Of all the other books you’ll find
there’s none salvation whole
Get the dust off the Bible
And redeem your poor soul.
#10

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, tgusa said:

He is right about missing soul. Just take a look at parts of New Orleans, Detroit, Chicago, Miami , LA and a host of other cities. Right here in my city we still have our souls and we don’t want to be turned in to one of the soulless by any wishy washy interloper, period. There is something wrong in America but it would be nice if we weren’t all smeared with the same crayon. It is projection, projecting one groups problems on all the other groups. Just come out and tell the truth Barak/Michelle everyone has heard it or seen it already. Its about time we see some change and change comes from within and really the ultimate goal of change is to change in to something better. I will take my neighborhood he can keep the change.
#11

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Lindsay said:

Swooners for Obama:
http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=91
#12

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:45 pm, ajmontana said:

Barack, Ryhmes with Crock.
Hussein, Rymes with Insane
Obama, Rhymes with Drama
Put em all together and Bill Clinton (biting tongue) was right.
It’s a Fairy Tale. Barackerella
But we wont live happily ever after.
#13

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, calamityville said:

Translation: “My husband is going to tax everyone into poverty.”
#14

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

A message for Michelle Obama:

Thank you Mrs. Obama for educating us on the status of our souls and who can fix it. I suggest that your husband start with his own political party as their souls seem to be the most in danger.
We have seen Democratic members of the House of Representatives block votes or fail to bring to a vote measures that will continue to protect our country. Please fix their souls.
We have seen liberal elements (some who support your husband) in towns and cities across the country come into conflict with the U.S. military–the very military where your husband wants to be C-in-C. Please fix these souls so they can tolerate and appreciate the military that provides for the common defense of this country.
To summarize–please clean your own house before you tell us what is dirty in ours.
#15

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:52 pm, bit_boy said:

Hoody Doody writes the Obama stuff. Inside Obama Hoody Doody lives (56k will take some time for the Morph to complete the first time). My adhominem is he looks like Hoody and sounds like Richard Pryor. I can not take what he says seriously to save my soul, amen brother.
#16

On February 16th, 2008 at 1:54 pm, Blind_Mule said:

We have lost the understanding that in a democracy, we have a mutual obligation to one another — that we cannot measure the greatness of our society by the strongest and richest of us, but we have to measure our greatness by the least of these. That we have to compromise and sacrifice for one another in order to get things done. That is why I am here, because Barack Obama is the only person in this who understands that. That before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation.

Oh brother,

Have you heard the commercial parity on Rush, Obama for Change.

I like Obama, He’s for Change and I think he will Change things.

LOL Rush has some funny stuff on his program.
#17

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, txvet2 said:

More words of wisdom from Rush. He mentioned the other day that Obama’s appeal wasn’t political, it was messianic - and the Michele Obama quote seems to indicate that this is intentional, ergo cynical. For me, the picture of him on stage with the other candidates during the Pledge of Allegiance standing with his mouth shut and his hands at his sides while the others recited the pledge was more than enough to discount him as a possible president.
#18

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:26 pm, lgm said:

A leader should inspire the people he or she leads to be better than they might have been. That’s what made Churchill (quoted above) a great leader. There’s more to leadership than making the trains run on time (and providing for the common defense). Mocking it won’t make it go away.

And Obama has substance too — detailed plans for health care, social security, (yes, and defense), etc. Check it out.

Your guy, McCain, doesn’t know much about the economy and doesn’t inspire anyone.
#19

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, graysonret said:

I agree. He sure talks like a politician. He talks plenty, but says nothing. He’s all about “change” but change from what to what? A President deals mostly with international issues and national security…and not, as some people think, with domestic issues, all the time. So far, I don’t know what he really stands for, on the international scene besides yanking all the troops home right away. I have a strong feeling we’re dealing with another Carter “wannabee”. The international community will run roughshod over him. He’s a “people pleaser” and you can’t be that, dealing with other countries.
#20

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:28 pm, T J Green said:

Frightening in contrast with the thoughts of a liberal who was imperfect yet a patriot and a war hero. President Kennedy sought higher ground with his famous “ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country” call-to-action. And he explained this was about freedom, what he called “a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself”.

IT is one thing to exhibit our better natures and foster such through leadership. It is quite another thing to dictatorially confiscate the livelihood of the productive and insist that this totalitarian taking is for the good of our souls.

Be wary of such sanctimonious pronouncements. Couple this with real power and you’ve got Mao 2.0
#21

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:28 pm, TexasTiger said:

Jonas Nightengale has a better chance of saving a soul than Oh!b♥m♥ does.
#22

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, beenthere said:

If the Brother from another planet and his $900/pair shoe wearing wife are so concerned about bringing all us lesser beings together and saving our souls, then for a start the two hypocrites could set an example and quit their GD black separatist church.

With this insane come to Obama bulljive, the two of them should creep out any rational person regardless of race, creed, or color. As Thomas Sowell put it: after healing America, repairing the world, then stopping climate change, what is this guy going to do on his seventh day of office?
#23

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, brooklyn red said:

lgm, re: “Your guy, McCain, doesn’t know much about the economy and doesn’t inspire anyone.”

Really, it seems that he inspired you…

True Obama does know more about the economy… he knows how to wreck it & make Lord Soros more billions by selling (America)short… and by the way, McCain ain’t my guy. But to end on a positive note, I am glad Obama inspires you.
#24

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, Blind_Mule said:

Obama: Come to me my children, so I may redeem your souls and cure your woes from cradle to grave.
#25

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, brooklyn red said:

I ain’t eatin that ~~wafer~~ waffle.
#26

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:24 pm, Laree said:

More than likely, she read this blog and is buying her husband’s press. I had a problem with this article on Obama. This Blogger is playing on these emotional chords, within Liberals I guess? All kinds of indentity politics in this article, something for everyone.

Lots of code words (My feminist daughter- Fear) Virginia is litered with monuments to their confederate past, (Guilt) and this last one.

We, perhaps white people especially, look to him for atonement and redemption. (Shame)

Last time I looked Obama wasn’t the second coming of Jesus Christ but this blog isn’t directed at Traditionalist. I believe she is preaching to the secular choir.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/unstoppable-obama_b_86677.html

My opinion of Obamania is not any of the above. The Politicians of today uses this phrase as a throw away “The American Spirit) When they use it, it sounds old, cliche and jaded. Obama doesn’t use it ,he plays the Chord - that is within the all Americans, this chord doesn’t get played alot so the MSM isn’t used to what the sound and response sounds like. Obama is playing the chord, and the more Hillary Clinton goes negative, the longer and stronger and louder, he will play this chord within Americans (The American Spirit) He will drown out the negative, jaded, cliche of Politics as usual. Obamania..it ISN’T about Hope not really, it is just a proposition. Lets turn the Page, that is all it is, it resonates with Americans. Especially Americans who don’t vote from Fear, Guilt or Shame.

It looks like the Left doesn’t have a clue about the appeal of Obama. A Page Turner NOT a Savior Mrs Obama.
#27

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, TexasTiger said:

On February 16th, 2008 at 2:26 pm, lgm said:

And Obama has substance too — detailed plans for health care, social security, (yes, and defense), etc. Check it out.

The link on “check it out” led to nothing…just like Oh!b♥m♥’s positions. Was the irony intended?

The substance of Obama’s health plan is a bottle of water fer whate’er ails ya’.

Hanover, N.H., Jan. 8, 2008. “Barack Obama’s first and only rally on election day came to a sudden and lengthy stop when a young woman in the Dartmouth College gym fainted, and was eventually rolled off on a gurney by emergency medical technicians,” the Los Angeles Times reported. “At first Obama half-narrated the episode, saying soothing things like, ‘She’s OK,’ ‘She’s talking.’ But the longer she lay on the floor, the quieter Obama got, standing on the podium, arms folded, looking worried as the medical crew worked.” Minneapolis’s WCCO-TV has video showing Obama handing a bottle of water to the Dartmouth damsel in distress.

Hartford, Conn., Feb. 4, 2008. “And when a woman appeared to faint in the standing-only VIP section in front of the podium, Obama paused his speech for over a minute as he directed the crowd to make way for an EMT team and tossed a bottle of water from the stage,” reported the Yale Daily News.

Seattle, Feb. 8, 2008. “Climate change, the Iraq war and Obama tossing a bottle of water to a woman about to faint all received big cheers,” MSNBC.com reported. “As Obama told the crowd to part so that the woman in question could leave and called for help, a young girl in the crowd shouted out, ‘What a man!’ The audience roared with laughter (although the press that has seen this happen before rolled its eyes).”

Obama’s defense policy? Run away! Run Away!

He lifted his Social Security policy from The Who: Hope I die before I get old.

But that’s just the rock star in Oh!b♥m♥ shining through.
#28

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, Jim M. said:

Each individual is responsible for their own soul, and by virtue of free will, the fate of one’s soul is in one’s own hands. And, Under our Constitution, spiritual matters are separate and apart from matters of concern to government.

The only movement of which I am aware that believes government is responsible for the souls of its subject is a government under Sharia law. And to keep its subjects on the path of “spiritually correct” behavior, the state enforces religious rules, putting infractions of those rules on the same level as what we understand to be criminal laws.

I would also note that Mrs. Obama’s idea of spiritual matters emanates from a church that bills itself not as a christian denomination, but a “Black Christian” denomination. Apparently, a lack of melanin in one’s skin pigmentation is a measure of the extent to which one is deserving of the love of Jesus. Perhaps her comment was limited to fixing only black souls, to the exclusion of all others. Perhaps her church believes that such other christians have no souls to fix in the first place, otherwise, why limit the inclusion of followers of Christ to a specific race?
#29

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, JohnHolliday said:

lgm, you obviously missed the point of the quote from Winston Churchill. I’ll clarify - socialism is BAD! Everything that Obama wants for this country is socialism. Therefore, Obama is bad for this country.

It doesn’t get any easier than that to understand.
#30

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, brooklyn red said:

Soroscialism? Ew.
#31

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:39 pm, Tom Blogical said:

Our souls are broken in this nation.

What a guilty conscience. Speak for yourself, Miss Empty Platitudes.
#32

On February 16th, 2008 at 3:53 pm, Dave Turson said:

I searched last week for info about Obama’s use of teleprompters. I found an article showing that his first intense teleprompter lesson came in 2004 when he prepared for his speech at the Democratic National Convention. John Kerry gave him the “keynote address.” The article shows Obama using the f-bomb while accusing Kerry’s speechwriters of forcing him to drop a line from his speech so they could steal it for Kerry’s speech. Ingrates do not make great national healers. The speech was Obama’s big break and made him wealthy when his “first book became a best seller and he got a signing bonus for a second,…”
#33

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, LC said:

We have lost the understanding that in a democracy, we have a mutual obligation to one another —

Sounds like communism/socialism to me…but what the heck do I know…I’m just a freedom-loving red-blooded American who believes in what’s right.
#34

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, docflash said:

If he gets elected there won’t be time to worry about our souls or going to church,we will all be out looking for SPARE CHANGE.
#35

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, jsr said:

Vote Obama because he believes we can have a future filled with hope. We need to change because tomorrow is not yesterday and the future starts now. Your hope is my hope. Together we will change the past for a better tomorrow.

How can anybody say he doesn’t have have firm policy positions? Only people that don’t have hope for change could believe such a thing!
#36

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, Blind_Mule said:

we have a mutual obligation to one another

It takes a village, don’t ya know?
#37

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, Marshall Russ said:

M.Obama’s socialistic rant is over at Hugh Hewitt’s blog at townhall.com. A must listen to see what we are in for if she and BHO get to the White House. Scary very scary.
#38

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:35 pm, Blind_Mule said:

we must hope and look foward with confidence about change so we can alter the future and see a time to come because the past is so yesterday.
#39

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, brooklyn red said:

Marshall, it’s Obama’s Soroscialisict rant… give credit where it is due.
#40

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

BHO is working for change.

We live in the most powerful, the most prosperous, the most free country in the world.

Can he change it?

Yes he can!
#41

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Lindsay said:

Worth reading.

Is Obama going to stand up to radical Islam prior to the election?

Will he be considered an apostate if he does?
#42

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:53 pm, joeyb1955 said:

Goal of Dems: An all secular socialist society. Can I get an Amen?!?
#43

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:09 pm, lgm said:

JohnHolliday said (#29):

You obviously missed the point of the quote from Winston Churchill. I’ll clarify - socialism is BAD! Everything that Obama wants for this country is socialism. Therefore, Obama is bad for this country.

That was not my point. M. Obama was saying that her husband could inspire Americans to find their American souls. M. Malkin said Presidents should not be in the inspiring business, but should manage the country and conduct wars. I referred to Churchill because he was a great leader whose greatness came from his ability to inspire his people. (He was not a great military tactician or a great manager.)

By the way, the “socialist” welfare state policies of we’ve had in America since the 30’s are popular in the US (maybe not with you). Don’t equate welfare with Communist dictatorship.
#44

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, Laree said:

Tom Blogical,

They miss the whole point, the reason Obama is cutting into Hillary’s demographic and the Independents is because Obama is a hope monger, he is saying the American Spirit is alive and well, just because the current batch of Politicians, have been cynical and negelectful re the American Spirit, doesn’t mean that they have managed to destroy American’s spirits. Obama never mentions the American Spirit he just strums the chord in Americans and all kinds of people respond. Only a self hating leftist, would make that remark “our souls are broken in this nation” That isn’t who Obama is connecting with, not with the size of the vote, he has been getting. I guess those folks who hate themselves and their country, think by voting for Obama, they are performing somekind of penance? They can’t see past indenity politics. Incredible the Left is clueless about Obama’s appeal.
#45

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, brooklyn red said:

lgm, re: “M. Obama was saying that her husband could inspire Americans to find their American souls.”

She is right, we have found our souls… & on a deeply spiritual level we reject her husband.

Better dead than red. lgm, thank you but we know who we are.
#46

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, Jeddite said:

I dont think Jewel was referring to Obama when she sang “Who Will Save Your Soul”?
#47

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, BOB said:

Seeing Obama rid us of the Clintons would be wonderful……saying President Obama would be a nightmare come true…….kind of like President McCain.
#48

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, brooklyn red said:

And by the freakin way …”By the way, the “socialist” welfare state policies of we’ve had in America since the 30’s are popular in the US (maybe not with you). Don’t equate welfare with Communist dictatorship.”

They have their hand in my pocket, so it ain’t popular w/me, & I have no choice in the matter… so, yes it is a dictatorship. For now…
#49

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:34 pm, Laree said:

It isn’t our souls he’s after

Mrs Obama, should be careful with the “American Soul” rhetoric, she will start alienating people. Mr Obama will become the incredible shrinking canidate.
#50

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, txvet2 said:

lgm said:

M. Obama was saying that her husband could inspire Americans to find their American souls.

Right. A messianic message, seemingly by intent.

(He was not a great military tactician or a great manager.)

You need to read more about Churchill. Good biographies abound.

By the way, the “socialist” welfare state policies of we’ve had in America since the 30’s are popular in the US (maybe not with you). Don’t equate welfare with Communist dictatorship.

Your confusion continues unabated. We refer to these programs, popular or not (after all, it’s always popular among a certain class of people to be able to live off of others’ efforts), as “communist” because that’s what they are. Reread your Marx. The “dictatorship” is the Socialist part, which is necessary to effectuate the wealth transfer that is communism/welfare.
#51

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, Lindsay said:

Here is what Australia’s PM had to say about Obama:

I think that will just encourage those who want to completely destabilize and destroy Iraq, and create chaos and a victory for the terrorists to hang on and hope for an Obama victory,’ Howard said on Nine Network television. ‘If I were running al Qaeda in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008 and be praying as many times as possible for a victory, not only for Obama but also for the Democrats.’
#52

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:49 pm, babbledabble said:

Obama is spooky & creepy. I am afraid of him, he gives me the willies. I worry what will happen when he becomes the almighty ruler of the universe.
#53

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:00 pm, reverenddon said:

Lindsay,

That would be the former Australian PM not the current one.
#54

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:08 pm, right_on said:

That before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation.

Is this turning into Obama-speak? Kind of like, “What we need is CHANGE…because CHANGE is what we need!” or… “I hear what you are saying, and when I get to Washington, it’ll be because I heard what you said!”

Is it just me, or is Obama sounding more and more like those Aflac Yogi Berra commercials? You know…”If you get hurt and miss work, it doesn’t hurt if you miss work!” Too funny!!!
#55

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

It makes me very nervous when someone refers to our nations “soul”. Perhaps Mrs. Obama thinks we can fix our souls by converting to Islam? Shall we become part of the ummah?

God help and protect us from people like this!
#56

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm, heroyalwhyness said:

#55 Nervous? Confirmation for such concern . . .“muslims for Obama” video
#57

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:32 pm, brooklyn red said:

No, no y no!!! Obama is not down w/Islam… he down with Soros.

For God’s sake, Soros, Soros, y Soros! Where the F^(# is the DOJ!
#58

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:41 pm, Blind_Mule said:

brooklyn red said:
No, no y no!!! Obama is not down w/Islam… he down with Soros.

For God’s sake, Soros, Soros, y Soros! Where the F^(# is the DOJ!

LMAO
#59

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:47 pm, Romeo13 said:

Said it two years ago…

American left was ripe for a cult of personality… someone who would take all those nasty decisions that a free person has to make away from them… so they could feel good about themselves…

It was a historical inevitability, but most folks don’t learn more history than they are taught in our lousy public schools…

Stalin, Hitler, Musolini, all started as well spoken politicians who had limited substance to their positions… lots of rhetoric, no specifics… it wasn’t until they were in power that the people learned what they really were like…
#60

On February 16th, 2008 at 6:52 pm, brooklyn red said:

Mule, this is not funny. A foreign billionaire, (atheist) criminal is buying our government… and we are sitting back and letting him!

Dare I say to arms! This is a “soft” invasion.
#61

On February 16th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

#56…….Which is EXACTLY why I am nervous!!! : )
#62

On February 16th, 2008 at 8:18 pm, MrArchieBunker said:

I remember going to church with my parents as a young man and leaving with a feeling of contentment, empowerment and fullfillment. The pastors words word ring in my ears for a while. Later in the afternoon, I couldn’t remember a word he said, but I still felt great. The Obama phenomenon in a nutshell folks
#63

On February 16th, 2008 at 9:03 pm, WarTip said:

Odd how people have chastising me since I was a child for my paranoid visions of a left-leaning government that finally leaned so far to the left it tilted and fell. From the problems with centralization of federal governmental control and power to the perversion of the role for the SCOTUS things have been rolling steadily downhill for far too long.

I have been called a “conspiracy theorist” and much worse. While I doubt anybody here really cares about me personally …

No matter what your opinion about the presidential VOTE may be, we have by far, the most socialist choices we have ever had in our nation’s history.

The SCOTUS is legislating from the bench unrepentant and not held to any account for their actions.

Acts of sedition and treason are overlooked and often even rewarded behaviors.

Our “representative” government seems to be more interested in representing PACs, SIGs and Lobbyists than we the people.

Social Welfare programs ARE socialism, thus the name Social Welfare and these programs (Along with government power and control) are increasing at an alarming and even dangerous rate.

The limitation of Rights granted to the federal government by the Bill of Rights (Which impedes the power of the feds and does not grant rights to the people) are constantly spat on and shat on and ignored. We the people graciously bow down and accept our fate as our rights are eroded and taken from us.

My second worst fear is that it will come down to just more than voting to change what our government and our nation have become.

My biggest fear is that when that time arrives, we will have already been silenced in the name of PC and the “common-good” of the people.

The only consolation if there is any … if and when it comes to that, the useful idiots have historically been the very first to visit the firing wall so we may at least survive long enough to see that.

Am I scared? Not about FISA! If anybody ever needed a reason to know the difference between a democracy and our Constitutional Republic, they need look no further than our founding fathers.

If anybody still doubts the evil of democracy rather than a nation of equally representative government and law, they need only look at the comments of this lady who I presume has at least some limited knowledge of actual law?

Sorry about another long response …
#64

On February 16th, 2008 at 10:15 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

If he’s so damn worried about our souls, does that mean he’s going to put the smackdown on Newdow and drop that whole “separation of church and state” business? I guess that’s the only way he could implement sharia law.

lgm, the only part that frightens me is that you might actually believe the ridiculous things you say.
#65

On February 16th, 2008 at 10:31 pm, Blind_Mule said:

brooklyn red said:
Mule, this is not funny. A foreign billionaire, (atheist) criminal is buying our government… and we are sitting back and letting him!

Dare I say to arms! This is a “soft” invasion.

The subject matter you speak of is not funny I’ll give you that, what I was laughing at was the rant it sounded like me when I was at the tender age of 17 years old, so I was laughing at you not with you.

The fact is this “soft invasion” you speak of has been going on for decades since the time of Lenin and the Communist Regime of the U.S.S.R., Soros is not the first of his ilk, Armand Hammer is the father of the “soft invasion”, the U.S. has been infiltrated by socialist since Lenin, Ronald Reagan recognized this in his years in Hollyweird and fought tooth and nail against it all the way to the end of cognitive thinking.

At the 1981 inauguration of Ronald Reagan, Armand Hammer was seated in a section reserved for senators. Hammer stood in the doorway hoping to shake the hand of the president, Reagan ignored him because years earlier, the head of French intelligence had warned him that Hammer was a Soviet agent.

George Soros is the incarnation of Hammer, Soros started his devaluation of the Britsh pound in the 80’s and was successful in 92 just as he is doing to the American Dollar now. Soros as Hammer has friends on both sides of the isle and is just as dangerous as Hammer, all you have to do is look at who they associate there selves with and you will find those that are and were in collusion with them both. I doubt seriously that any of the associated politicians have changed their views now or since dealing with either one.

The “soft invasion” is now a blatant invasion, there is nothing soft about it, it is out in the open socialism, they are not hiding it anymore because they have media brainwashed and educationaly indoctrinated enough people in the preceding decades they no longer have too. I have been telling people about this since my Russians teacher in High School made us aware of the fact. They have been witling away at Democracy year by year and will successfully destroy Democracy if the American population does’nt wake up from their slumber soon.

So in closing it is not funny at all, but some will not get it until it’s to late.
#66

On February 16th, 2008 at 10:34 pm, nbarry said:

#59 beat me to the phrase “cult of personality” with respect to Obama. That phrase was also penned by Paul Krugman (no conservative he) in the New York Times. Obama has many things going for him. He is good looking, eloquent, conducts himself like a gentleman and has so far run a classy campaign markedly free of negative attacks. If this was all we considered in choosing a president, Obama would bury his opposition all the way to the White House.
However, issues count, and that is why he must be watched carefully and his opinions, especially on foreign policy and national defense, subjected to heavy scrutiny. If the MSM refuses to do so and instead bangs the drum on his bandwagon, I trust independent thinkers like our hostess will hold his feet to the fire.
#67

On February 16th, 2008 at 10:47 pm, DagneyT said:

Michelle and Oprah seem to think their guy is really the “2nd coming”!
#68

On February 16th, 2008 at 11:34 pm, garyt said:

LGM you would not like anything about Winston Churchill if he were alive today and you could hear his views. You probably would be like the pink folks and calling Winston a Hitlerite.
#69

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:25 am, nyc123me said:

I AM Obama - FEAR ME!
on second thought, just praise me for now, the fear bit will come later.
#70

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:14 am, Papa Louie said:

lgm said:
And Obama has substance too — detailed plans for health care, social security, (yes, and defense), etc. Check it out.

Let’s say I find something I like in one of Obama’s detailed plans. How can I be sure the “Candidate of Change” won’t change his mind and change his plans once he’s in office?
#71

On February 17th, 2008 at 3:19 am, graysonret said:

NBA’s Barkley thinks we conservatives are all “fake” Christians. Amusing. Ignorant people make me smile.

http://www.breitbart.tv/html/48184.html
#72

On February 17th, 2008 at 3:30 am, olympian2008 said:

This “fix souls” controversy is an attempt to create something out of nothing. It’s about as lame as it gets.

And the fainting spells… LOL! Now you know people are getting desperate.

Being a Reagan conservative I’m not happy with the candidate on our side and probably will never vote for him, but I’m not going to join in trashing Barack Obama with all these BS attacks by other conservatives.

Barack came from humble roots, used the foundation of a great education to move forward and succeed in his life so far, he’s an honest, decent family man with a great and supportive wife, etc. I don’t have to agree with him on one issue to admire him and his life story, which can be summed up in a few phrases… “I have a dream” and “living the America dream.”

If you are going to point out the many issues where Obama is wrong from a conservative’s perspective that is one thing (and there are many), but what we have here amounts to personal attacks that are Hillaryesque. It seems that somehow the Clintons are getting conservatives in the blogosphere to do their dirty work.

Grow up conservatives and stop acting like whiny little brats!
#73

On February 17th, 2008 at 6:11 am, Ronbo said:

Hitler wanted German souls as well:

HITLER AS GOD AND MESSIAH

http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Stadium/6712/hitleras.htm

HEIL OBAMA!
#74

On February 17th, 2008 at 7:53 am, graysonret said:

olympian2008, I am grown-up. which is why I left the democratic party and became a conservative. We conservatives are not interested in socialism. We are not interested in entitlements and government control. We are interested in “free enterprise” and the “pursuit of life, liberty and happiness” and limited government. Obama, like Hillary, believes in socialism and regulated industry. He also believes in controlling our lives through healthcare and taxing the hard-working person (their definition of the “rich”) to support those who don’t work, or honor our laws and legal system. We conservatives want our children to grow up and have the “American dream”, and not some “womb to tomb” mentality that is being dished out already in our schools. I don’t think conservatives are interested either in where or when a candidate was born, raised, or how he/she led a life. We are interested in today. Obama is an inexperienced politician using his race and desire for power, to win an office for which he really isn’t qualified. Being President isn’t about domestic issues; it’s about international relations. Congress is about domestic issues. The President is about this nation’s security. Checks and balances. I left (grew up) the democrats with Carter. I know Carter…I was a volunteer on his inaugural staff. I see another “Carter” in Obama. Lord knows, we don’t need another 4 years of that!
#75

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:01 am, RealImmigrantChick said:

This is spooky. This man has limited charisma and he is making the left swoon as if he is a god, and to them he is. If they are swooning at this guy, who really says nothing, can you immagine how they will swoon and faint and go into ecstacy when the anti-Christ shows up, someone with real charisma and also some power? This is a preview of how easily these godless people are lead to a false god.
#76

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:03 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

When you add up the sum total of these great posts, you have the world - and our manifest, actual choices - as they exist today and into the future:

On February 16th, 2008 at 9:03 pm, WarTip said:

No matter what your opinion about the presidential VOTE may be, we have by far, the most socialist choices we have ever had in our nation’s history.

The SCOTUS is legislating from the bench unrepentant and not held to any account for their actions.

Acts of sedition and treason are overlooked and often even rewarded behaviors.

On February 16th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, Marshall Russ said:
M.Obama’s socialistic rant is over at Hugh Hewitt’s blog at townhall.com. A must listen to see what we are in for if she and BHO get to the White House. Scary very scary.

On February 16th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, Lindsay said:
Here is what Australia’s PM had to say about Obama:

I think that will just encourage those who want to completely destabilize and destroy Iraq, and create chaos and a victory for the terrorists to hang on and hope for an Obama victory,’ Howard said on Nine Network television. ‘If I were running al Qaeda in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008 and be praying as many times as possible for a victory, not only for Obama but also for the Democrats.’

On February 17th, 2008 at 7:53 am, graysonret said:
Obama, like Hillary, believes in socialism and regulated industry. He also believes in controlling our lives through healthcare and taxing the hard-working person (their definition of the “rich”) to support those who don’t work, or honor our laws and legal system.

Debate is good, but these points really are fundamentally where we are today in terms of our choices. In that context, I wonder why there is so much debate in the first place. Everyone has different opinions and no one thing is right for everyone, of course, and while we can disagree on the details, it seems to me that these basic truths quoted here add up to the
actual reality of what happens if we elect - or assist in the election by abstention or third party voting - of either Hillary Rodham Clinton or Barack Obama into the White House.

We as conservatives and/or Republicans better find some general unity here and get to work, because the enemy is on the horizon and bearing down fast. Between the laws they will very quickly enact and the judical appointments for life they will put into place ASAP to ensure that those new laws stay in place for the rest of our lives I’m wondering if we really have the time and energy to devote to anything except beating the enemy. Because if we don’t, rest assured that in less than two years the United States of America will be fundamentally terribly and horribly changed for the rest of our lives in ways we probably can’t even imagine. Remember, the judges are appointed for life and cannot be removed from power.

No hyperbole, no fear-mongering, no intellectually dishonest posturing. If if view the Democrats’ record and content of their speeches from a conservative point of view, that’s the inevitable reality.

We better get to work.
#77

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:07 am, Rohan said:

WarTip (#63) - Dang, I can’t disagree with anything you said!

lgm - I did go to Obama’s website. I disagree with virtually his entire platform. Once you get around the sweet words, it is just marxism, pure and simple.

Olympian2008 - These “attacks” on Obama’s messiah image are legitimate. He wants to be the President. Take the heat, or get out of the kitchen.
#78

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:18 am, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

Greysonret

I left (grew up) the democrats with Carter. I know Carter…I was a volunteer on his inaugural staff. I see another “Carter” in Obama. Lord knows, we don’t need another 4 years of that!

If only it were as moderate a situation as that. That was 30 years ago. There was no cable, no internet. The media (of which I know something about from the inside) couldn’t take the pulse of America so specifically, or to put it a different way, didn’t know how much they could get away with. So there was a modicum of fairness, for appearance sake if nothing else.

All that has changed. The simple slip on election night when Carter was being elected ( Roger Mudd: “I think he (Carter) has a message for us” - which stopped the show cold for 20 seconds, after which time he was suddenly seen regularly in PBS ) would be considered a casual remark for a TV anchor today.

It was a damning time for Carter when he admitted to “lusting in his heart” in a Playboy(!) interview. Today, most of America has come to dismiss Clinton’s affair in the actual Oval office itself with a girl his own daughter’s age, and dragging her reputation through the mud until material evidence was found, and he had to shame the nation with his Prime-time admission of a sexual affair with “that woman”.

We never had a Speaker of the House so relentlessly and unapologetically Marxist. Or two Democratic Presidential candidates who are also so Marxist.

By comparison, I could almost long for the choice among the dems for a Jimmy carter(much as I can’t stand him).

Greysonret, I hear you, but this is 1000 times worse than those halcyon days of 30 years ago. The situation today is genuinely serious.
#79

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:38 am, derel3433 said:

we all must now act as adults and learn to love mccain. if anyone has a better solution, i’m open to it.
#80

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:52 am, mytake said:

Does Michelle realize that “the least of these” are the unborn and B. Obama is in favor of partial birth abortion?
#81

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:59 am, TexasTiger said:

On February 17th, 2008 at 9:38 am, derel3433 said:

we all must now act as adults and learn to love mccain. if anyone has a better solution, i’m open to it.

Agree with the sentiment, but not the language. In fact, that phrasing is likely to enrage the short-fused and be counter-productive.

We don’t need to love McCain, just pull the lever for him in November.

Think of it as: We’re going out to dinner with him; we’re not going home with him.
#82

On February 17th, 2008 at 10:02 am, TexasTiger said:

Grow up conservatives and stop acting like whiny little brats!

And that’s where you lost me, olympian. I’d accuse you of painting with a broad brush, but I think you’re using a spray painter.
#83

On February 17th, 2008 at 10:15 am, Nichevo said:

On February 17th, 2008 at 3:30 am, olympian2008 said:
Barack came from humble roots, used the foundation of a great education to move forward and succeed in his life so far, he’s an honest, decent family man with a great and supportive wife, etc. I don’t have to agree with him on one issue to admire him and his life story, which can be summed up in a few phrases… “I have a dream” and “living the America dream.”

That depends on your definition of the word “humble.” Obama thundered at a recent speech that his father “abandoned” him a age two. Well, yes, he did: to attend Harvard, which Barack Sr. soon left to return to Kenya as a senior economist in the Kenyatta government. Five years later, his mother married an official of the Director General’s office in the TNI Topography division of the Indonesian Army and later an oil company executive, and moved to Indonesia. When she divorced her second husband, his mother sent her 10-year-old son to live with her parents in Hawaii, where he attended a prestigious and expensive private school. From there, he briefly attended Occidental College in Los Angeles before transferring to, and graduating, Columbia U. in NYC. After a hiatus of five years during which he worked as an Alinsky-styled “activist” in Chicago, he enrolled in Harvard Law School, where he became the first African-American president of Harvard Law Review.

I think you’ll find that Mr. Obama’s carefully crafted life story contains many enhancements that won’t stand the light of scrutiny, such as his self-confessed youthful “drug problem” — a tale of woe that the NY Times (hardly an oppositional source) could find not one fellow student in any of the above-mentioned four schools to corroborate.

As for the “Dream,” I’d say Mr. Obama is a great example of the fruition of Martin Luther King’s dream, but instead of using that truth as his narrative and focus, we are plunged by his rhetoric into the necessity of “change” in an America that he judges to have failed because — to paraphrase the above Churchill quote — all of its citizens are not sharing equally in the misery of some of its citizens.
#84

On February 17th, 2008 at 10:21 am, ajmontana said:

With the games Congress is playing with our National Security and the lack of protecting our open Borders by the time November rolls around were all going to be blown to bit’s anyway.

Tip:
stock up on emergency supplies.
#85

On February 17th, 2008 at 10:28 am, Concerned Citizen said:

We have no choice but to vote McCain. We need to vote for the best option available because the alternatives are far worse than Carter.

Carter didn’t have the kind of socialist Congress and press in place that we do today. Let’s not forget that during that four years of Carter is when Islamic Fundamentalism got a hold in Iran. Just imagine how it could flourish with an appeasement president placating them every time they become offended. Anything other than Sharia would be a hate crime.
#86

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:07 am, MrScribbler said:

One of the reasons Obama will win in November is the self-centered “my way or the highway” attitude of the conservative “pundits.”

They see the dangers of the socialist/communist/”religious” zealotry on the left, but always have to include their snarky denunciations of McCain (”nose plugs”) wherever they can.

Does anyone really believe the Democrat attack dogs aren’t lapping up every negative word Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, Malkin and the rest are putting out about McCain?

And when he loses they election, they will no doubt rise as one and say to McCain, “you blew it.”

Nope. They blew it.

It’s as if they have a plate of food they don’t like standing between them and starvation. Instead of doing the sensible thing, they whine about the food. And starve.

Let me amend that: We starve; they have their gigs to fall back on, and can spend the next eight years telling us about Obama’s evil ways.
#87

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:22 am, graysonret said:

Cat, I hear you. It is worse now, than back in Carter’s Presidency. We have a very liberal Congress, out of control, who have 2 favorite sayings that has become so trite as to be disgusting now: “tax cuts for the rich” and “our fair share”. Plus, we have an aging SCOTUS. Some of the judges may not be present in 2012. With another Burger court, a socialist Congress, and a Marxist President, we could see some changes that could take decades to repair…if ever. Gas lines, here we come….
#88

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:25 am, corona said:

Speaking of the Messiah’s opponent, Michelle, you have to see this!
#89

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:41 am, bit_boy said:

Graysonret #73, thanks for telling Olympian #71 they are in the wrong line. I was just about ready to send myself to my room but won’t now, thanks. One of the things I’m now researching is where might wonder boy and girl be if it were not for special entitlements given to subculture members and if it is as I think then would not such a background form a strange platform to govern the land of the free and home of the brave (as the Supreme Court reevaluated).
#90

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:43 am, Laree said:

Ann Coutler was right about the Left it is really Dumb, Dumb, Dumb, they just can’t wait to self destruct? There are religious people who are for Obama right now…put him in their Saviour’s role and turn off a big part of the electorate…why? because the far left is secular and doesn’t get the “verbage”

The people suggesting that Obama is going to SAVE people - People are not voting for Obama out of FEAR,GUILT and SHAME, like Barbara who blogs for Huffington Post, suggest, they the Leftist are overlaying their own self disgust onto the American Electorate. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb….Will the Leftist rhetoric destroy their best canidate who could win in November?

Obama it looks like your base, doesn’t get it “You are a Page Turner” they can’t be satisfied with your appeal to the rest of the American Electorate, that is curious and wants to have a look at whats next, good or bad…So be it, We will have another 20th century Presidential Election.

McCain - pre baby boomer
Hillary - boomer
Obama - after boomer

If the Left destroys Obama’s chance, they are left with Hillary, who I believe McCain could easily beat.
#91

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:46 am, olympian2008 said:

Michelle Obama is on the cover of the upcoming Newsweek, “Barack’s Rock” (7 page article on-line)

At least some conservatives making a living out of bashing Barack Obama and his wife with false innuendo will have more material to use in attacking them now.
#92

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, Marshall Russ said:

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:46 am, olympian2008 said:

Michelle Obama is on the cover of the upcoming Newsweek, “Barack’s Rock” (7 page article on-line)

At least some conservatives making a living out of bashing Barack Obama and his wife with false innuendo will have more material to use in attacking them now.

And which part is false innuendo?
#93

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, Marshall Russ said:

Follow the link at Lucianne.com to the article ‘I don’t hate Muslims. I hate Islam,’
says Holland’s rising political star

It’s a preview of what is going on in Europe now and here tomorrow. We cannot retreat in any way against this onslaught.
#94

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, TK-421 said:

From Left to right, top to bottom, Double standards! Gota Love em!

I for one hope Obama crashes and burns, he is deadly, not because he’s half black, or maybe a muslium. But as his only running trait seems to be Charisima, and he has no idea’s what so ever that he has given detail too. That is Dangerous in a leader when it is the only trait said leader has.
#95

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, olympian2008 said:

To make up for all the conservatives bashing Barack Obama and his wife on non-policy “issues” I’m only posting positive stories about Barack from now on, even though I will not be voting for him in November.

The Honolulu Advertiser endorses Barack Obama - Democrats need Barack Obama’s vision, leadership

Fort Worth Star-Telegram endorses Barack Obama - Transformation time

Corpus Christi Caller-Times Endorses Obama - Obama offers Democrats inspirational leadership

Yesterday in Eau Claire, Wisconsin there was an overflow crowd. Barack is gracious in taking the time to speak to them before the rally inside the jammed packed arena at the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire begins, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwhEcHHhVvU
#96

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, Blind_Mule said:

MUST READ THE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY DEPENDS ON IT.

This is the progression of Socialism in America, I don’t know if you have read any of the links in my lengthy post above but it gives you some history on how Socialism started to infiltrate American politics. If your a conservative you should know the enemy we are up against, that is the only way to fight it. Obama is not in the caucus but don’t let that fool you, many Senators and Congressmen do not want to be associated with the caucus because of higher political asperations.

Below are several links in progression, they are all associated with one another, they all have the same socialist ideology. If you are genuinly concerned and care about where America is headed then educate yourselves on the facts.

The first 2 links will lock you in so if you want to check them out open another window to Michell’s site and open them in there.

International Socialists

Democratic Socialist of America

Do you see any names on this list on the link below that you might know, and who are they supporting for POTUS.

Congressional Progressive Caucus

Wiki Socialist International

Wiki Democratic Socialists of America

Wiki Congressional Progressive Caucus

Good insight on the Free Republic

Free Republic, Proof That Democrats = Socialism/Communism

As I stated in my last post above the Socialists have been infiltrating our government for decades and are becoming ever closer to their goal, a Socialist Society. Barrack Obama is the last nail in the coffin of Freedom and Democracy.
#97

On February 17th, 2008 at 12:46 pm, dakine said:

Great post olympian…couldn’t agree more. The demagoguery, hyperbole and intellectual dishonesty on this site (by the host and many of the commentators) often times overwhelms its numerous positive attributes.
#98

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, novaculus said:

Anyone objective observer familiar with psychology must see the parallels between liberal zealots and religious zealots, but liberals themselves are blind to the religious nature of their “faith”. Anyone familiar with psychiatry will recognize the neurotic transference with which liberals attempt to cope with the cognitive dissonance their beliefs create whenever they are confronted with reality.

It is unusual to see such a clear example as Mrs. Obama’s impassioned and irrational rhetoric.
#99

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:03 pm, Mr_Conservative_Cat said:

Gentlemen,

Great posts, and great analysis Mr Scribbler, but…

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:22 am, graysonret said:
Gas lines, here we come….

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:07 am, MrScribbler said:
One of the reasons Obama will win in November is the self-centered “my way or the highway” attitude of the conservative “pundits.”

….With all due respect, no. It doesn’t have to be that way, nor should we pretend for a moment that it can be something we can allow. I know, it’s tough not to get beaten down. But try these words from Ronald Reagan for a little “No they can’t and Yes we can” inspiration:

**************************************

Ronald Reagan

Election Eve Address “A Vision for America”

11/3/1980

The election will be over soon, autumn will become winter, this year will fade into next . . . and yet, the decisions we make tomorrow will determine our country’s course through what promises to be one of the most perilous decades in our history.

I know that tonight the fate of America’s 52 hostages is very much on the minds of all of us. Like you, there is nothing I want more than their safe return- -that they be reunited with their families after this long year of imprisonment.

When they have returned, all of us will be turning to the concerns that will determine the course of America in the next four years.

A child born this year will begin his or her adult life in what will be the 21st century. What kind of country, what kind of legacy will we leave to these young men and women who will live out America’s third century as a nation?

In thinking about these questions, many Americans seem to be wondering, searching. . . feeling frustrated and perhaps even a little afraid.

Many of us are unhappy about our worsening economic problems, about the constant crisis atmosphere in our foreign policy, about our diminishing prestige around the globe, about the weakness in our economy and national security that jeopardizes world peace, about our lack of strong, straight-forward leadership……

,,,,,At this very moment, some young American, coming up along the Virginia or Maryland shores of the Potomac is seeing for the first time the lights that glow on the great halls of our government and the monuments to the memory of our great men.

Let us resolve tonight that young Americans will always see those Potomac lights; that they will always find there a city of hope in a country that is free. And let us resolve they will say of our day and our generation that we did keep faith with our God, that we did act “worthy of ourselves;” that we did protect and pass on lovingly that shining city on a hill.

************************************

The scenaros that you describe, Greysonret and MrScibbler and anyone who might otherwise be feeling sure that our best days might be behind us, will not become a reality. They will not because they can not and together, as conservatives we’ll do everything we can and prevail to make sure they do not.

We’ve all had plenty of time to be angry and disappointed and to complain about it. That’s natural under the circumstances. But that time has passed.

Now we work to win. Not because we want to, but because we must. Not an ideal victory, but one good enough - good enough because we cannot allow the alternative. Reagan didn’t give all he had for us to stay home or vote third party to hand the country and it’s history over to a handful of socialist democrats who would strip away everything we hold dear for the rest of our lives. You two will vote the Republican ticket, you’ve made that clear. What we need to do together - all of us - is to do everything we can to make sure everyone does. Once again, for the entirely uncomplicated reason that the alternative is simply unacceptable.
#100

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, ajmontana said:

The demagoguery, hyperbole and intellectual dishonesty on this site (by the host and many of the commentators) often times overwhelms its numerous positive attributes.

Dakine, c’mon dishonest? I think you’re mistaken this site for some other rag you must read.
Michelle and commenters here point out dishonesty from these liars running our country into the ground.
They cant get away with it as easily as before because sites like this and our lovely hostess are bringing it out very effectively.
#101

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, TexasTiger said:

At Harvard Law, she took part in demonstrations demanding more minority students and professors.

By her own actions, a quota queen.
#102

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, TexasTiger said:

Some of her teachers told her she didn’t have the grades or test scores to make it to the Ivies. But she applied to Princeton and was accepted.

How dare anyone call her a quota queen!
#103

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, TexasTiger said:

The three of them talked often about the racial divide on campus—especially how white students they knew from class would pass them on the green and pretend not to see them. “It was, like, here comes a black kid,” says Acree.

Ah! A self-pitying quota queen.
#104

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, TexasTiger said:

On February 17th, 2008 at 11:46 am, olympian2008 said:

Michelle Obama is on the cover of the upcoming Newsweek, “Barack’s Rock” (7 page article on-line)

At least some conservatives making a living out of bashing Barack Obama and his wife with false innuendo will have more material to use in attacking them now.

Olympian, are you implying that the Newsweek article is full of falsehoods?
#105

On February 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

#96 —
Cat, if Fred had half the passion you did in that post, he’d have been a contender.

They think we’re fragmented and hate McCain, but they don’t know that we’re realists and will end up voting for the most conservative candidate available, even if it’s a RINO.
#106

On February 17th, 2008 at 2:02 pm, Blind_Mule said:

Mr_Conservative_Cat

Excellent post.

I’ve been reading alot of Reagans speechs latley. Reagan spoke of what is inside all Americans, he woke up the consciousness of the American people, he spoke of the duty we all had to perform to keep and preserve Democracy in this, the Greates Nation in the history of mankind. The fact that a women and a black man at this point in our history can run for POTUS and be seriously considered is proof that we as a nation have progressed into a nation of people from all walks of life, genders, races, ideology and religions and live peacefully with one another. We can voice our differences and have healthy debate without the fear of reprisal.

I read most all of your long winded posts and you are very passionate about your views. I respect your opinions and agree with most of them, you, Reagan and some others make some very good arguments on the subject of voting for McCain. I’ve always told myself never say never and I have said I would never vote for McCain but I can not say that was a true statement on my part, although I do not like McCain, reading Reagans speechs has reawakened my sense of duty as a Conservitive. I told you and some others you had to convince me to vote for McCain and even though I don’t think he is in the Conservitive best interest that can be changed by American Conservitives.

No matter who the Democrat nominee is he or she must be defeated in Nov. Obama is an excellent oritor and will mesmerize many to check his box, even some Republicans are talking about it, but this will not be good for the Party itself. I believe that it is a purposful attempt at fragmenting the party and if it is allowed it is possible it may cease to exist in the form that we believe it should be. We can fix this problem by more active involvment on a large scale and that is what is going to have to happen to preserve our Conservitive ideals and our Democracy.
#107

On February 17th, 2008 at 2:13 pm, Azygos said:

We can fix this problem by more active involvment on a large scale and that is what is going to have to happen to preserve our Conservitive ideals and our ~~Democracy~~Republic.

There, fixed it for you.
#108

On February 17th, 2008 at 2:19 pm, Blind_Mule said: