Comments on: America, 1. ACLU, 0.

By: Michelle Malkin Doesn’t Like to Reap What She Has Sown « Jason Cardillo

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:13:54 +0000

[...] years, Michelle Malkin has pounded home the idea that the only way for us to be safe from enemies both foreign and domestic, was for [...]

By: Stop The ACLU Blogburst: Supremes Reject Domestic Spying Case | Stuck On Stupid

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:41:45 +0000

[...] Michelle Malkin says, “America 1. ACLU 0! [...]

By: Blue Collar Republican » Blog Archive » Blog Burst - February 20, 2008

Blue Collar Republican » Blog Archive » Blog Burst - February 20, 2008 — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:16:22 +0000

[...] Lack of MRAPs cost Marine lives America, 1. ACLU, 0. Frontline convinces me- Haditha Marines innocent National Security At the [...]

By: SCOTUS TURNS AWAY ACLU LAWSUIT « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger

SCOTUS TURNS AWAY ACLU LAWSUIT « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:14 +0000

[...] Malkin calls it: America 1, Those Lost Without ACLUe [...]

By: Neocon News » ACLU smacked by Supreme Court & Predictions on FISA

Neocon News » ACLU smacked by Supreme Court & Predictions on FISA — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:41:24 +0000

[...] Michelle has more background. [...]

By: graysonret

graysonret — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:04:56 +0000

The ACLU, remember, was a close ally of the American Communist Party back in the 20s and 30s. It left the Party in 1940, and, originally, had the right idea of defending the Bill of Rights, but, it was taken over by the Left and has become more radical since then. Unfortunately, that is true for many organizations that started out with a “good idea”, like MADD and Sierra Club. Now it’s full of young lawyers trying to make a name for themselves, as well as being naive and gullible of the radical left. A good idea once, gone bad. I’m glad they lost. I’m glad whenever they lose, usually.

By: BelchSpeak » Post Topic » Supreme Court to ACLU re: TSP- STFU, STFD

BelchSpeak » Post Topic » Supreme Court to ACLU re: TSP- STFU, STFD — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:38:48 +0000

[...] blogging this is Michelle Malkin and [...]

By: Chief RZ

Chief RZ — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:46:41 +0000

ACLU: Listen. We are at war. The war clause(s) of the constitution trump Acts or Bills passed by congress but not by 3/4ths of the states. We need more clear thinking Supreme Court Justices and less communists on the court like RBG.

By: Barry F.

Barry F. — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:51:56 +0000

Well, chalk one up for national security.

By: SHoward

SHoward — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:35:35 +0000

guitarguy nailed it. Theyjust can’t listen to evryone all the time.

What I have been told is they have computer programs that can pickup on keywords. They then plug in known code words the bad guys use, and the system keys in on the call in question and alerts the operators.

Point being, as long as you don’t tell anyone your name is Bin Laden, you probably won’t be listened to.

By: TexasTiger

TexasTiger — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:33:03 +0000

On February 19th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, John Ansell said:

Hey Pelosi, how was the wedding?

Hope Code Pink tried to disrupt it.

By: Salt

Salt — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:23:41 +0000

KaosKlerik said:

A petition arguing for the banning of Dihyrogen Monoxide (DHMO)…

Just so long as it isn’t that dreadful Carbon stuff that causes global warming… /sarc

Maybe we can convince the ACLU to become completely carbon free?

By: guitarguy

guitarguy — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:21:59 +0000

Why do they refer to this as ‘eavesdropping’, or ‘wiretapping’…?
Think of how many phone calls are taking place at any given moment in this country.
Then imagine how many people it would take to ‘eavesdrop’ on all of those conversations.
If the government were truly eavesdropping then it would need a staggering amount of individuals to listen-in and determine if what they were hearing was of any value.
And while that’s going on, what about all of the calls that aren’t being monitored (for lack of ‘eavesdroppers’)…?
Are they recorded and monitored later on?
But wouldn’t that data then be useless??

By: KaosKlerik

KaosKlerik — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:41:43 +0000

Well put. As a test of people’s gullibility, an organization (I forget which one) conducted a door-to-door “petition drive” asking people to back a Constitutional amendment repealing the first 10 amendments. “Help us get rid of the crime-coddling ‘Bill of Rights’” was the slogan.

I got a better one. A petition arguing for the banning of Dihyrogen Monoxide (DHMO).

It’s a major component of Acid Rain.
It is used in the distribution of many pesticides. Even after washing produce remains contaminated by this chemical.

In it’s solid form it can diminish the immune system and is responsible for thousands of deaths each year. Prolonged direct contact usually results in cell death usually leading to amputation.

In it’s liquid form it causes thousands more death each year, including in the home.

In it’s gaseous form it can burn skin, cause involuntary body tempeture rise, and prolonged exposure can lead to death.

He got a bunch of people to sign the petition to ban WATER.

Solid = Ice
Liquid = Water
Gas = Steam

Don’t believe me?

By: bpm

bpm — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:38:10 +0000

Its funny the number of cheerleaders that warrantless wiretaps have. What was stopping them from getting warrants from the FISA Court? To much paperwork? To large a dragnet (everyone?)? I think some of the folks on here could stand to read some of the gov’t filings in Hepting vs. AT&T. Esp. when the DoJ lawyers suggest that the executive branch is above the law.