About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

The swan song of Hillary Rodham Clinton?; Update:Clinton and Obama are now against the Secure Fence Act they both voted for; Update: Hillary snarks on Obama’s “change that you can Xerox;” Update: Hillary gets shrieky over universal health care; Update: Hillary ends on a Miss Congeniality/valedictory note

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 21, 2008 07:50 PM

Scroll down for updates…here’s the “change that you can Xerox” video… “Lifting whole passages from someone else is not change you can believe in, it’s change you can Xerox.” Who wrote it? Knowing Washington, we’ll know soon enough…Hillary’s ending statement is being categorized by all the talking heads as “valedictory”…Like I said: Swan song…

No, you can’t count her out. But just what exactly can Hillary Clinton do during tonight’s CNN debate in Texas to turn things around? What would define a “win” for Hill tonight–short of a full Obama meltdown, which isn’t going to happen? The show begins at 8pm. This ABC poll says she’s ahead in Ohio and it’s tight in Texas. Will the new anti-Obama 527 come up?

Stand by for the liveblog. Popcorn ready, but no Red Bull.

Update 8:02pm Eastern. This debate is co-sponsored by open-borders, Spanish-language media giant Univision. Founded by McCain national campaign finance co-chair Jerry Perenchio.

Univision anchor Jorge Ramos is one of the questioners.

Look for plenty of opportunities for shamnesty pandering tonight.

8:06pm Eastern. Clinton gets the first opening statement. She registered voters in Austin and San Antonio. Clinton invokes the late Barbara Jordan. It’s Jordan’s birthday. Jordan, a staunch amnesty opponent and outspoken immigration enforcement activist, would be rolling over in her grave knowing Clinton’s using her name. Clinton invokes Ann Richards. Eh. Clinton brags about starting S-CHIP. Segues into health insurance company-bashing. Mentions HER EXPERIENCE.

Not a word about immigration. Or those, ahem, holes in the wall.

8:10 pm Eastern. Obama’s turn. He says he’ll be friends with Hillary after, she was friends with her before. Unification, baby. He’s sick and his voice is hoarse. Obama mentions the predatory loan victims he mentioned the other day. Uh-oh! Hillary forget to mention her pet issue! Must be cursing under her breath. Obama mentions jobs moving overseas. Obama mentions his anti-war bracelet. Doesn’t mention his lack of a flag lapel pin. What’s lacking right now is not good ideas. The problem is that Washington has become a place where good ideas go to die. (Applause). Now comes the usual anti-special interest attack…and the “bring people together” spiel.

Now, Obama invokes Barbara Jordan. “I want America to be as good as its promise.”

Univision’s Jorge Ramos to Hillary: “Would you be willing to sit down with Raoul Castro at least just one?”

Hillary: “I hope we have an opportunity…I’ll be looking for changes…releasing political prisoners, freeing up the press…I would be willing to reach out once they demonstrated they were truly willing to change direction…I would not meet with him until there was evidence that change was happening…”

Campbell Brown to Obama: “Presumably, you would meet with Raoul Castro?” Obama: “I would meet without preconditions…but with ‘preparations’ first…We have to talk to our enemies, not just to our friends…” Wants loosening of restrictions on remittances and travel restrictions. “I wouldn’t normalize relations until we saw change…I support the eventual normalization.”

No, I don’t get exactly what his position is. Do you?

Hillary wants to reach out to Iran. She would “use bipartisan diplomacy!” The era of unilateralism and arrogance of this administration is over. Applause. Hillary’s beaming. She’s really, really happy with her answer.

Obama wants to get a last talk-to-our-enemies word in. “It’s important for us in undoing the damage that has been done to take this step.”

8:23pm Eastern. John King changes to the economy. “How would Pres. Obama be different in managing the nation’s economy?”

“Restore balance and fairness.” End tax breaks to companies overseas. Offset payroll tax. Repeal Bush tax cuts. Applause. “Create a green economy!” Wave the magic wand: Windmills! Solar power!

Hillary: “The wealthy and well-connected have had a president for the last seven years. It’s about time the rest of us had a president for us.”

“The rest of us”–you know, like the Clintons, who have a net worth of between $10-$50 million Snort.

Hillary: I can’t concentrate on what she’s blabbering about, but she started shrieking about “Bush’s War on Science.”

Jorge Ramos goes to immigration. He’s complaining about federal raids. “Would you consider stopping these raids until comprehensive immigration reform passes?”

Hillary: “I would consider that, except in egregious situations.” She demagogues about children being left without parents. Babies left without parents.

She’s for cracking down on federal employers, but not doing anything about illegal alien employees. “We need a path to legalization to bring the immigrants out of the shadows.” Blah-blah. “If they committed a crime, they should be deported. But a path to everyone else.” Who illegally entered the country. Would introduce “comprehensive immigration reform” in her first 100 days.

Obama. He’s for immigration reform, too. “It’s absolutely critical that we tone down the rhetoric.” “We have seen hate crimes skyrocket.”

No, unfortunately, he’s not talking about illegal alien gangs targeting black Americans.

Obama mentions the legal immigration backlog and increasing fees.

“We have to improve relations with Mexico.” He assails Bush for dropping the ball on Mexico. “We haven’t seen the kind of outreach and cooperative work.”

Clueless.

Two words: Merida Initiative.

8:37pm Eastern. John King raises the border fence.

King to Hillary: Would you commit tonight to finish the fence and speed up construction or say, wait a minute, do we really want to do this?

The UT-Brownsville would have part of its campus cut off. Passport requirements to the north are interfering.

“We need to review this. We were voting for the possibility that where it was appropriate, it would be built. Bush is going off the deep end.”

1) That’s not what the law said.

2) The problem is not that Bush is going too far. It’s that they have dragged their feet and pandered every bit as much as the Democrats.

Hillary says we should do “Smart Fencing.” Now, she doesn’t want physical barriers.

Even though she (and Obama both) voted for the Secure Fence Act.

Obama: “The key is to consult with local communities…I will reverse that policy…” He wants everything but a fence now.

Obama invokes the specious “we can’t deport all 12 million undocumented” card.

8:43pm Eastern. Obama wants to pass the DREAM Act illegal alien tuition benefits legislation.

Jorge Ramos speaks Spanish. “Is there any down side to the US becoming a bilingual nation?”

Hillary: It’s important for Americans to become bilingual. But it’s important that English remain our common, unifying language.

8:47pm Eastern. Commercial break. Nasty Hillary has not made an appearance tonight.

All platitudes, no vinegar tonight.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

8:52pm Eastern. John King tries to wake everyone up with a question about the “parallel universe” in which Hillary/Obama attack each other on the campaign trail and talk cordially next to each during debates. King: Are you saying your opponent is all hat and no cattle and how can you say that after the last 40 minutes?

Hillary: “I do offer solutions…it’s part of my life.” Blah, blah. No attacks. She’s Miss Congeniality. There are differences between our records. Hillary mentions the Hardball exchange with Kirk Watson, who couldn’t name an accomplishment of Obama’s. “Actions speak louder than words.”

Obama: “I do think actions speak louder than words. Which is why over the last 20 years, I’ve acted a lot to provide health care, reform criminal justice system, reform ethics system, create transparency in government…mentions wounded warriors at Walter Reed who had to pay for their meals and phone calls before he came to Senate…they would say I’m not just talk, but action.”

8:56pm Eastern. Obama ribs Clinton for calling his supporters “delusional”…he mentions all his newspaper endorsements in Texas…”I think they perceive the reality in Washington quite clearly…The reason that this campaign has done so well that people understand that it’s not just a matter of putting forward policy positions…if we can’t inspire people to get involved in their government, get beyond racial divisions, regional devisions, religious devisions…I’m running for president to start doing something about suffering and so are the people behind my campaign.”

Huge applause. Longest applause of the night.

8:58pm Eastern. Campbell Brown brings up Hillary plagiarism charges. Obama says Deval Patrick gave him the lines to use. The suggestion that this is plagiarism is silly. Big applause. This is where we start getting into silly season and people start getting discouraged. What people want is how are we going to get good jobs and wages, college is affordable, etc. What I’ve been saying in these speeches–and I have to admit, some of them are pretty good–big applause–I’ve been talking about changing tax code, college loans, bringing end to war in Iraq…We should be spending time lifting people up.

Well, I’d say he has pulled the rug out under Hillary on this issue.

Hillary has a frozen smile. If you’re candidacy is about words, they should be your own. These aren’t changes that you can believe in, it’s change you can Xerox.

9:01pm Eastern. Boos. Hillary condescends. “You are a passionate speaker.”

Obama: “That’s not right.” Hillary is booed.

Hillary talks about foreclosures, health care. “We’ve got to look hard at the difficult challenges we face once George Bush is gone.” Blah blah.

Obama moves on to talking about health reform differences. Old territory.

9:06pm Eastern. Obama razzes Hillary over her secretive conduct during the 1994 health care debacle. Score.

Commercial break.

9:13pm Eastern. Hillary is getting shrieky over the health insurance mandate thing.

Guess what? Newsflash, Clinton camp: This thing has been rehashed over 5-6 other debates. It’s not a winning issue for Hillary. It’s not damaging Obama.

9:22pm Eastern. Rehashing Iraq. Leadership. Change. Nothing you haven’t heard before.

9:33pm Eastern. Obama gets a question on earmarks. He mentions teaming up with GOP Sen. Tom Coburn on googling for government to open up process.

Hillary has the audacity to talk about the US borrowing money from China to give to Saudi Arabia.

Her voice is getting really, really intolerable.

Agh.

9:38pm Eastern. Campbell Brown asks really, really dumb questions. She needs to host a daytime talk show and stay there. “What was your moment of crisis?” Obama recounts his entire life. Hillary jokes about how she’s “been through many crises in her life.” Smiles. Basks in applause.

I can’t have caffeine. I can’t have caffeine. I can’t have caffeine.

Hillary turns the question to Americans who have had real crises. Recounts meeting soldiers at Brooks Army Medical Center. What she’s been through is nothing compared to what ordinary Americans go through.

It’s a better answer than the self-absorbed Messiah’s.

9:44pm Eastern Hillary: “I’m absolutely honored, absolutely honored to be here with Barack Obama.”

Shakes his hand. Ick.

Big applause. “Whatever happens, I hope we can say the same about the American people.”

She’s basking. He’s kicking himself.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hillary, raul and the debate
  2. Presidential election 2008 |Republicans Vs. Democrats » The swan song of Hillary Rodham Clinton?
  3. Blatant Reality » Blog Archive » Live-Blogging the Texas Democratic Debate
  4. Health Care BS - HEALTH QUESTIONS FOR OBAMA
  5. Clinton Concession Looming? | netZoo.net | WOOZradio
  6. Charlie Foxtrot - Obama says troops have no ammo
  7. Blue Collar Republican » Blog Archive » Blog Burst - February 22, 2008
  8. Reformed Hippie
  9. Texas Smackdown « THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS
  10. Michelle Malkin » What Barbara Jordan stood for
  11. kaila yu candy coated sugar
  12. ny dvd complete

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On February 21st, 2008 at 7:54 pm, Right is right said:

    Soon she will assume her true form….. watch out those wings don’t poke you.

  2. #2
    On February 21st, 2008 at 7:57 pm, steveegg said:

    No Red Bull? Well, considering Hillary will provide the horns, maybe it makes sense.

  3. #3
    On February 21st, 2008 at 7:58 pm, gippergirl said:

    Barry’s fanbase doesn’t seem be going on much…I think Hill needs a facelift…a new look might dazzle the masses…

  4. #4
    On February 21st, 2008 at 7:58 pm, Barry F. said:

    I’m still trying to convince myself to watch the Democrats’ debate.

    I am pretty sure this won’t be the lovefests we’ve been seeing in the past with them. ;-)

  5. #5
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:00 pm, Barry F. said:

    a new look might dazzle the masses

    How about her turning around and going home in defeat (taking Bill with her)? ;-)

  6. #6
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:03 pm, John Ansell said:

    What no Red Bull? Well I guess there will be plenty of bull during the debate.

  7. #7
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:04 pm, John Ansell said:

    I wonder, since she seemed to fail at doing it in the past 10 elections, if she will congratulate Obama on his wins.

  8. #8
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:04 pm, gippergirl said:

    My theory has always been that Mrs. Clinton can’t win the nod, but the Widow Clinton has a fighting chance…am sure Billy Jeff sleeps w/one eye open…

  9. #9
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:05 pm, Barry F. said:

    “No hard and fast rules to follow”? Well. Well. :-)

  10. #10
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:06 pm, Barry F. said:

    Well. Hillary has lived in Austin and San Antonio now……. She gets around, huh?

  11. #11
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:08 pm, Barry F. said:

    Hillary wants to take care of the veterans? Veterans everywhere should be afraid of how HRC would “take care of” them.

  12. #12
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:10 pm, gippergirl said:

    Hillary wants to take care of the veterans? Veterans everywhere should be afraid of how HRC would “take care of” them.

    It’s called The Buddy The Dog Program…

  13. #13
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:11 pm, Barry F. said:

    Look at how Hillary is holding her head backward as she tries to look toward Obama feigning interest in what he is saying.

  14. #14
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:13 pm, Barry F. said:

    Does Obama seem to be stumbling a little more tonight than usual or is it just me? I think Hillary is making him nervous with the long stares. :lol:

  15. #15
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:13 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    Can you understand anything that Univision guy is saying?

  16. #16
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:14 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    It’s called The Buddy The Dog Program…

    Ah yes. The one that got hit by a car resulting in an untimely death. I remember that.

  17. #17
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:17 pm, John Ansell said:

    Hillary: “I hope we have an opportunity…I’ll be looking for changes

    Stealing Obama’s line (well Gingrich’s)

  18. #18
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:22 pm, DougT said:

    This is just awful. Marking time until Lost starts.

    The Hill is making a preemptive strike on BO’s “united” message.

  19. #19
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:27 pm, DougT said:

    Obama: Well, I would raise the minimum wage to $100K per year. It’s time we were ALL in the top 5 percent of income in the United States.

    I would stop predatory lending by making housing completely free. Everyone gets a 3 BR/2 bath home.

    Trade should be as completely unfree as possible.

    Senator Clinton cannot one up me in giving out treasure. Treasure that I will have the Bureau of Engraving printing non-stop to cover my grandiose plans.

    If you have suggestions for anything that I can provide you in the name of getting elected, please go to your local library and visit my website, where you can make a donation to my campaign with your 23.99% APR predatory credit card.

  20. #20
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:28 pm, Barry F. said:

    BO and HRC have already lost my interest for the evening. I’ll just stick to checking on what Michelle is live-blogging about it. I can’t stomach the socialist propoganda tonight and the pandering to illegal aliens, especially with Univision opening up with their Spanish intro tonight. :roll:

  21. #21
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:30 pm, DougT said:

    Hey, if the Dems have magic wands, we won’t need windmills and sunshine.

  22. #22
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:31 pm, DougT said:

    Open the gates…for the children.

  23. #23
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:35 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    They are in TEXAS they have to pander to the illegals!!

  24. #24
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:35 pm, DougT said:

    Are they debating? Or just clarifying each other’s talking points?

  25. #25
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:37 pm, CC said:

    I couldn’t stomach watching either one of them, and my comment is blah, blah, blah.

  26. #26
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:37 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    I need a barf bag

  27. #27
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:38 pm, DougT said:

    Why is UT Brownsville partly in Mexico?

  28. #28
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:39 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    I live in Texas and I can tell you what we need to be doing to protect our country, Hill. But you don’t want to listen!

  29. #29
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:40 pm, legendx3 said:

    i was watching the debate it was like a bad movie

  30. #30
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:43 pm, AlturaCt said:

    How can Democrats complain of “special interest” with a straight face?

  31. #31
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:44 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    I’m not watching (working on chores: got to prep for painting a ceiling and walls - you know, a job Americans won’t do for themselves…) the debate.

    However, I have a few comments:

    1) While subbing today, I was talking to one of the regular teachers. Wherever on the UT campus they are holding the debate, it only seats 3000. There were to be 2900 “invited guests” and only 100 tickets available to the “general public”. I guess keep that in mind in regard to audience reactions.

    2) I listen to AM talk radio out of San Antonio (so I get both Rush & Hannity). Heard that Hill has been having vets call other vets to try to get them to vote for her, instead of having some polling/call center company handle those calls.

    3) Mom early voted yesterday, and that teacher I was talking to has voted already, too. They both said the Hillary supporters were out in force outside the polling places.

  32. #32
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:45 pm, DougT said:

    ah oh…new education standards…we can’t master english, so let’s require another…

  33. #33
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:46 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    I don’t know, DougT, but Brownsville sits right on the border at the southern-most tip of Texas. I would wonder what the ownership rules would be for UT to own real property in Mexico - according to my understanding to the Mexican constitution, an American citizen wouldn’t be able to own real property there…

  34. #34
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:48 pm, steveegg said:

    8:47pm Eastern. Commercial break. Nasty Hillary has not made an appearance tonight.

    Call me crazy, but I think Clinton has seen the inevitable and is trying to get just enough healing done so she can be at the bottom of the ticket.

  35. #35
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:48 pm, AlturaCt said:

    Bi-lingual nation. Did either of them answer the question?

    Also, why does this question ALWAYS lead people to say we should all learn a second language? That has absolutely NOTHING to do with the problems of being a bilingual nation.

  36. #36
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:49 pm, DougT said:

    That’s what I would think, Miss Ladybug. Perhaps there is a Matamoros College there and they share a facility.

    Or better yet, the city of Brownsville has ordnances that require a 3 yard setback from the property line for fencing. So there’s nine foot strip of the university on the wrong side of the wall.

  37. #37
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:50 pm, Renee_VA said:

    Well, they are both setting up McCain so he can use talk of a “fence” to sucker more conservatives in (by using it as his contrasting opinion, even though he is one of the poster children for illegal immigration, Mr. Shamnesty)…

    but he’ll be sitting, ready and waiting with pen in hand (if he were elected) to sign the same ol’ tired reform bill he helped push with Kennedy.

    They are not going to build a fence until Americans get sick and tired and take justice into their own hands (but complacency makes me wonder if that will ever occur).

  38. #38
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:51 pm, DougT said:

    I tuned in specifically for the wailing and gnashing of a cornered Clinton. We’re getting another kumbaya “discussion” session.

  39. #39
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:52 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    Hey, I’ve been around for 35 yrs and she hasn’t done anything for me!

  40. #40
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:53 pm, MrScribbler said:

    Hillary won’t make it official that English is our national language.

    Both of them want to surrender to hordes of illegal aliens.

    At least McCain claims he’ll secure the border first.

    If these two clowns “care passionately about the country” — as The Hildebeest just said — let the withdraw from the races and give us a president who won’t turn our Nation into a Marxist/socialist state.

  41. #41
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:53 pm, gayle said:

    Same old same old…..

    I am waiting for Obama to part the Red Sea.

  42. #42
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:54 pm, juliesa said:

    The UT-Brownsville would have part of its campus cut off.

    I hate Hillary as much as anyone here, but what she said is true. The original survey put the fence through the university. This is why local input is critical. The locals rebelled and the route for the fence was moved to the south, so the University could stay intact.

    It’s not Conservative to plop down a huge federal project on landowners without local input.

  43. #43
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:54 pm, DougT said:

    I keep expecting one of them to lift a card with the other one’s answer and then they squeal and hug. It’s like a verbose version of The Newlywed Game.

  44. #44
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:54 pm, Barry F. said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:48 pm, steveegg said:

    Call me crazy, but I think Clinton has seen the inevitable and is trying to get just enough healing done so she can be at the bottom of the ticket.

    I don’t believe for a minute that she has resigned herself to being second banana, Steve. I am convinced the Clintons see them as the only choice and that everyone will come around to them on the Democrats’ side.

  45. #45
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:56 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I am waiting for Obama to part the Red Sea.

    Is he walking on water too?

  46. #46
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:56 pm, cjean said:

    Is she throwing in the towel? There is no fire in this woman!

  47. #47
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:56 pm, DougT said:

    They are delusional, Barry. (sigh) They are. (tear rolls down cheek)

  48. #48
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:56 pm, Barry F. said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:52 pm, atxcowgirl said:
    Hey, I’ve been around for 35 yrs and she hasn’t done anything for me!

    Would her turning my stomach, every time she opens her mouth to speak, count? ;-)

  49. #49
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:57 pm, docflash said:

    I watched my 5 minutes worth.I guess they didn’t hear the outcry last summer about illegals.They dont care what the majority wants.McCain better be listening.They left a lot of votes on the table.Both are going to reassess the fence,find a way for amnesty,and push for everyone to learn a second language.I speak hillbilly and a little English,I have my 2.

  50. #50
    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:59 pm, Barry F. said:

    I speak hillbilly and a little English,I have my 2.

    Hey, Doc. I’m fluent in Hillbilly too with a strong Appalachian twang. ;-)

  51. #51
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:00 pm, juliesa said:

    Why is UT Brownsville partly in Mexico?

    It’s not. I’ve said this a thousand times already on this blog, but no one listens.

    In Texas, the fence will be built as much as a mile north of the border. This is why farmers, townspeople and others, in Texas, are worried about winding up on the south side of the fence.

  52. #52
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:01 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    I speak hillbilly and a little English,I have my 2

    Hee hee, I speak a little hillbilly too!

  53. #53
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:01 pm, DougT said:

    There’s a bit of the cult of personality coming through in the audience’s effusive cheering. It’s like the last couple of seasons of Good Times when JJ would step onto the set.

    Finally, some fight…over a non-issue. Did you see “the youtube”?

  54. #54
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:02 pm, MrScribbler said:

    Hillary just stepped on the appendage women aren’t suppose to have when she started in on St Obama re plagiarism.

    The Queen of Mean lives!

  55. #55
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:02 pm, AuntiEm said:

    I shouldn’t have watched. It’s worse than I thought. Why doesn’t anyone ask what role the American people would have in their government in their brave new world?

  56. #56
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:03 pm, zorro said:

    I’m having visions of Jane Curtin and Dan Aykroyd doing Weekend Update…

    Hillary, you ignorant s…

  57. #57
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:05 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    Why doesn’t anyone ask what role the American people would have in their government in their brave new world?

    What role? They know what’s best for the American people, doncha know.

  58. #58
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:05 pm, DougT said:

    Would that it were that interesting, zorro. I can’t hang with this. The presumption that government should be even addressing these “issues” is too much to stomach.

  59. #59
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:07 pm, DougT said:

    Great point, juliesa (#51). The cure could be worse than the illness in many places.

  60. #60
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:09 pm, zorro said:

    You are right Doug, time for some Dr. No on DVD.

    Michelle, thank you for covering this and most of the debates for us. I don’t know how you do it and still maintain a normal blood pressure!

  61. #61
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:10 pm, Keith said:

    Is it my imagination or has Campbell been retaining some weight? :-)

  62. #62
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:10 pm, Barry F. said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:05 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    What role? They know what’s best for the American people, doncha know.

    Yes. Politicians don’t see themselves as a delegate of the people by whom they are elected to represent their interests but, rather, as a trustee that knows better than their electorate what is best for them.

  63. #63
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:13 pm, zorro said:

    She is painful to listen to. Ouch.

  64. #64
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:13 pm, Barry F. said:

    Geez! I switched over to Fox to get away from this debate and danged if they don’t have Geraldo Rivera on H&C.

    That’s it. I just need to turn in for the night. Rivera makes my blood boil with his idiotic commentary. Ugh! :roll:

  65. #65
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:14 pm, Barry F. said:

    Good night, all. You are better than me to hang with this debate tonight. *sigh*

  66. #66
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:16 pm, Django said:

    OT - Hannity & Colmes just brought on Geraldo Rivera to pontificate on the merits of the NY Times’ McCain story.
    …click…

    Frigging ridiculous.

    When will Fox get a clue that its audience is not interested in nitwits like Rivera and Al Sharpton?

  67. #67
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:17 pm, right_on said:

    Hillary vs. Obama; Obama vs. Hillary? What’s the difference?

    Democratic gloom-and-doom offers little change and less hope.

    The rhetoric of Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton about the sad state of America is reminiscent of the suspect populism of John Edwards, the millionaire lawyer who recently dropped out of the Democratic presidential race.

    Barack Obama may have gone to exclusive private schools. He and his wife may both be lawyers who between them have earned four expensive Ivy League degrees. They may make about a million dollars a year, live in an expensive home, and send their kids to prep school. But they are still apparently firsthand witnesses to how the American dream has gone sour. Two other Ivy League lawyers, Hillary and Bill, are multimillionaires who have found America to be a land of riches beyond most people’s imaginations. But Hillary also talks of the tragic lost dream of America.

    In these gloom-and-doom narratives by the well-off, we less fortunate Americans are doing almost everything right, but still are not living as well as we deserve to be. The common culprit is a government that is not doing enough good for us, and corporations that do too much bad to us.

    In the new pessimistic indictment, the home-mortgage meltdown has not occurred because too many speculative buyers were hoping to flip houses for quick profits. It had nothing to do with misguided attempts of government and lending institutions to put first-time buyers in homes through zero-down payments, interest-only loans, and subprime but adjustable mortgage rates — as part of liberal efforts to increase home-ownership rates.

    And there apparently are few Americans who unwisely borrowed against their homes a second and third time to remodel or purchase big-ticket consumer items — on the belief that their equity would always be rising faster than their debts. Nor are we to look at this downturn as part of a historical boom-and-bust cycle in the housing industry — the present low prices and non-performing loans the natural counter-response to the overpriced real estate of the last five years.

    Likewise, we’re told that students are failing to graduate from college because there are too few government-guaranteed student loans. We don’t hear that thousands enter public universities without basic reading and mathematical skills — or that their college problems might be due in part to their own misplaced priorities in high school, and in part to an educational system that is mostly therapeutic, offering fluffy courses and self-esteem training rather than rigorous math, science, literature, and history classes. Nor is there ever mention of teachers’ unions, the system of tenure, or a vapid, politically correct curriculum, as explanations for why our students are not competitive in the global marketplace.

    We also hear that oil prices are sky high and our own automobile industry is failing due to windfall profits and corporate greed, but there’s no discussion of the fact that oil-rich autocracies like Russia, Venezuela, and the Gulf monarchies have obtained a stranglehold on the global petroleum supply.

    For Hillary and Barack, our automobile manufacturing crisis is not the result of uniquely lavish union health and retirement packages for American autoworkers. The government is somehow mostly to blame for Detroit’s meltdown and the energy crisis, not Americans’ own tastes in the 1990s for large gas-guzzlers and big homes, and their concurrent opposition to nuclear power plants, oil drilling off the coasts and in Alaska, and conservation of resources.

    Wal-Mart, free trade, and our debt to China also come in for blame. Neither Obama nor Clinton suggests that the middle classes of America have more purchasing power and have accumulated more consumer goods than any people in history. In reality, our acquisitiveness is a result not of corporate greed, but of our fondness for shopping at discounted warehouse mega-stores, whose goods are the result of hard work of hundreds of millions of low-paid Chinese. They not only toil long hours to make our cheap televisions and stereos, but their government lends us the money at low interest — through massive buying of U.S. government bonds — to buy their stuff in the first place.

    To the extent that we have any social and legal problems from unchecked illegal immigration, it has nothing to do with the cynicism and corruption of the Mexican government that deliberately exports, exploits, and profits off its own people. The problem is not the fondness for low-paid, off-the-books illegal labor among the upper-middle classes, nor the disdain for the law of illegal immigrants themselves, who crowd to the front of the immigration line. Instead, America’s xenophobia, blame-casting, and insensitive government have made it needlessly rough on 11 million arrivals who otherwise did us a favor by coming.

    As Sens. Obama and Clinton try to outdo each other in blaming government for our lack of individual responsibility and promising solutions by raising taxes to give us more government, they offer little change and less hope.

    - Author unknown

  68. #68
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:17 pm, Django said:

    Ha!…BarryF, you beat me to it.

  69. #69
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:20 pm, zorro said:

    Tal-eee-bon weapons? Wow.

  70. #70
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:22 pm, zorro said:

    Rats, we’re missing Ninja Warrior.

  71. #71
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:22 pm, atxcowgirl said:

    Did he just way our troops had to steal Taliban weapons because we didn’t supply them with enough?

  72. #72
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:23 pm, juliesa said:

    Thanks, DougT. I think fencing is useful in many areas, but people need to the facts about we’re advocating here, and as much as I hate to admit it, Hillary was right about the University campus. It cost nothing to move the fence a little so that the students move around unimpeded, and this is why local input is critical. This is why Senator Hutchison sponsored that law requiring local input–so that stupid things like this could be prevented.

  73. #73
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:28 pm, tarpon said:

    I have somehow lost my place, can you clarify which is the Marxist and which is the Stalinist?

  74. #74
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:29 pm, gayle said:

    I think an electric fence would work.

  75. #75
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:30 pm, zorro said:

    Is this over at 9:30? I thought that info babe just said there’s a lot more to come, yikes!

  76. #76
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:33 pm, zorro said:

    Ok, the debate is complete, he said Halliburton…

  77. #77
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:34 pm, MrScribbler said:

    This “debate” proves beyond a doubt that we must get McCain elected.

    Granted, he’s far from ideal, but we just might have a chance to survive the next eight years with him in office.

  78. #78
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:39 pm, TXRose said:

    No one is listening to the American citizens on illegal border jumping. The politicians and the NYT are pretending that WE ALL want amnesty. I don’t how we can make them
    listen unless we take a week and keep DC and all of our state capitals ( if legislature is
    in session) closed down. Even then, Pelosi will just say that it was a few of the cracker
    GOP from the south and “don’t pay them no never mind.”
    HRC is going to scorch the earth, if she has to to get the nomination. I read somewhere
    today that Gore is standing in the wings waiting to shut her down at the convention if
    she gets too fractious.
    Miss Ladybug, I am going to vote tomorrow. I didn’t check to see if the Dems polling
    place is anywhere near ours. They are voting in droves up here.

  79. #79
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:41 pm, jsr said:

    Not bad questions this time, but still the same hollow answers with an inevitable jab at George Bush. I wish they would start each question “without blaming George Bush…”

    And what is this about the Army Captain with half his soldiers in Iraq and soldiers using Taliban weapons? The Hollywood writers strike must be over.

  80. #80
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:41 pm, zorro said:

    MrScribbler, I’m one of those who left the GOP because of McCain. I’ll support Melissa Hart for congress but not Mr. Shamnesty. Unless he wants to introduce a bill to fund the border fence and then resign the senate, I won’t support him.

  81. #81
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:43 pm, TXRose said:

    Juliesa…..My cousin is losing over a mile and a quarter of his land. He feels it is worth
    it if it protects his family, his property and his livestock. He just lost another dog to the
    illegals and is insanely p****d about it. I would hate to be an illegal if he catches one on his property in the near future. This is the second German Shepherd he’s lost to them.

  82. #82
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:44 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    I think all the early voting is together, regardless of party. My mom (and that teacher I talked to) voted at the Randall’s grocery store chain…

  83. #83
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:45 pm, Mookie said:

    Boy, that almost sounded like a goodbye on Hillary’s part.

  84. #84
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:45 pm, Speakup said:

    Jorge Ramos speaks Spanish. “Is there any down side to the US becoming a bilingual nation?”

    Infuriating.
    Can this be any more Balkanizing?
    The answer is yes, its a guarantee of permanent conflict and a permanent sub class.

    Hillary: It’s important for Americans to become bilingual. But it’s important that English remain our common, unifying language.

    Huh? Did she say something? Make up your mind, is it English or is it multiple somethings else?

    How do these people get a single vote after the amnesty debacle that occurred over and over the last two years?

    It may be too soon to write Hillary off or use the cult word concerning Obama but its close.
    The Kool Aid is nearly ready.

  85. #85
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:45 pm, steveegg said:

    Why can’t you have caffeine?

  86. #86
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:48 pm, TXRose said:

    You all that are not going to vote for McCain might as well say hello to a socialist country. I really don’t understand how you can sit on your hands and turn the country
    over to either HRC or BHO. I can honestly say that no matter what I think of McCain, I
    will not not vote for him and let them get into office with me sitting there saying, “Well,
    I don’t like McCain. My candidate didn’t get the nomination so I’m going to act like the
    Dems have been acting for over 7 years. It’s my turn to throw a temper tantrum.”

  87. #87
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:49 pm, zorro said:

    I can’t have caffeine. I can’t have caffeine. I can’t have caffeine.

    I’ve had a glass of Merlot. It’s cold outside!

  88. #88
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:51 pm, JConrad999 said:

    Another democrat debate lovefest.

    I still cannot tell the difference between the two on the issues.

  89. #89
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:52 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    I forgot to mention something else I’d heard on WOAI today: some Obama supporter said he’d do well in the debate if Hillary couldn’t pin him down to specifics, that Obama’s supporters are more focused on the “big picture”… Is that supposed to be code for “my guy is all talk and no substance”???

  90. #90
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:53 pm, fourstringfuror said:

    Jumping in late here . . .

    Jack and Coke at my house tonight - who’s in? :)

  91. #91
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:54 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    I’m guessing she gave up caffeine for Lent…

  92. #92
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:56 pm, Speakup said:

    I can’t have caffeine. I can’t have caffeine. I can’t have caffeine.

    If everybody knew the ugly truth of the consequences of caffeine, sodium, high cholesterol and high blood pressure, market shares for oatmeal and granola would go through the roof.

  93. #93
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:56 pm, zorro said:

    Rose, I’m sorry. There is no temper tantrum here, just principles. McCain says he’s a conservative, he is not. He’s just another career politician who serves himself. As I said above, it’s his move, he is still in the senate, why doesn’t he show us something conservative like support free speech? Fund the border fence? He can introduce a bill tomorrow if he wanted to.

    Nope, no more holding my nose to vote. I’ve done that too many times and am not going to do it ever again.

  94. #94
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:57 pm, juliesa said:

    TXrose, I agree, it’s a horrible problem, and a fence is appropriate in some areas, but I want to provide facts to those who think the fence will be on the actual border, when in reality it will be well inland. I know a rancher who found a woman’s severed head on his property, and he doesn’t want a fence because he’ll lose his water rights. He just wants the government to enforce the laws for a change, which they are NOT doing. All this is just to point out that the issue is more complex than just building something like a property fence.

  95. #95
    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:59 pm, TXRose said:

    Ladybug, I think that means all hat and no cattle. Now that they are in TX, these Yankees like to quote us. Kind of like the guy from the mortgage company whose ads
    are based on “bless your heart” and he has it all screwed up. None of us are going to
    straighten him out. Heard that expres BJ Clinton was supposed to speak in Victoria
    today and did not show up. Apparently there were some heavy hitters that showed up
    only to be disappointed. Wouldn’t want to be him tonight. They showed Chelsea on the news last night and it appeared that she couldn’t figure out how to wave or which
    hand to use in case she remembered.

  96. #96
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:03 pm, TXRose said:

    It is extremely complex. Cuz has 2 artesian wells. He is doing very well but I can
    understand the problem. I lived there and my father grew melons there. I do know
    what is at stake. I own part of my cousins land in that he sold shares within the family
    awhile back so I also have a stake. It’s the little people that will be most hurt by this.
    I would suggest land mines but some troll would accuse me of being hardhearted.
    Quite the contrary. I am at times too tenderhearted but enough is enough.

  97. #97
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:19 pm, juliesa said:

    TXrose, enough is enough, for sure. There are immigration highways going through there with the help of the Mexican government and corporate recruiters in the US. And the US attorneys are not prosecuting the coyotes as they should. Our place is out in far west Texas, well north of the border. When I was a teen, every now and then, aliens (we called them wetbacks–sorry, but that was the term)would show up looking for work, or food, and we felt sorry for them. We would sometimes give them a few cans of food, or a little task for money. Later, we started having crime, and when my mom would go out to give them something, I would stand behind the door with a loaded shotgun.

    This is a big huge problem that’s gone on for decades. It’s going to take a lot of brainwork to solve it, but building a fence down the middle of a university just isn’t smart.

  98. #98
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:27 pm, TXRose said:

    Juliesas, we called them wetbacks and mujados (may not be correct spelling but
    it means wetbacks) and as I have said before, the Rio Grande wasn’t that high and I could never figure out why wet-backs and not knees. We lived so close to
    the border that we could watch them coming across. We learned to look out for
    them because a lot of them thought nothing of breaking into houses and taking
    what they wanted. They would make some very very bad messes around the
    area. My Mother always said that they were (in some instances) completely amoral. I tend to agree now that I can look back. I guess that when you set out
    to live life outside of the law, that you do become amoral.

  99. #99
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:28 pm, Pat said:

    One puff question after another. I wish they would have the guts to have a debate run by bloggers.

    (You gave up caffeine for Lent?! My hat’s off to you, girl!)

  100. #100
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:28 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    TXRose posts disparagingly of conservatives refusing to vote for McCain, My candidate didn’t get the nomination so…I’m going to throw a temper tantrum.

    Your cheapshot irritates the pee out of me, TXRose. You utterly fail to grasp — or to honestly relate — the spirit in which most taking the no-vote-for-McCain stance are acting.

    Most of us came to Romney or to Huckabee in the end…few of us started there. It has nothing to do with the failure of some favorite candidate of our own. It is a strong stand against the last and ultimate compromise of voting against conservatism in order to vote for the GOP, which is now controlled by cynical pros like Karl Rove and Rick Martinez.

    Maybe you make your voting decisions on childish petulance and just find it hard to grasp the thinking of people who make hard votes on hard principle. You’re not qualified — intellectually ~or~ morally — to judge the basis on which other people make their decisions.

  101. #101
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:45 pm, MrScribbler said:

    Ignatius Reilly said:

    Most of us came to Romney or to Huckabee in the end…few of us started there. It has nothing to do with the failure of some favorite candidate of our own. It is a strong stand against the last and ultimate compromise of voting against conservatism in order to vote for the GOP, which is now controlled by cynical pros like Karl Rove and Rick Martinez.

    I’m guessing that means you’re perfectly willing to turn the Nation over to a Marxist/socialist so your principles remain intact.

    Seems to me like killing the patient to stop the disease….

    I don’t like McCain. But he looks remarkably good when compared to BHO and HRC.

    I’m with TXRose on this one. And I believe your final paragraph is more self-analysis than an attack on her.

  102. #102
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:50 pm, TXRose said:

    I cast my first presidential vote for Reagan after being a Ford supporter. I make my
    presidential voting decisions on what is best for the country and the party in that
    order. To call me petulant is to stoop to name calling instead of asking exactly why
    I have decided to vote for a candidate that I did not support. I cannot in good
    conscience not vote and then stand there while a socialist, with the backing of the
    Dems in DC ruins this country. McCain may not be the candidate that I want to vote
    for, but I believe that being a Republican with a Dem majority, he won’t have as easy
    a time of it in DC as a Dem would. True, he hangs out with the other side now, but it
    won’t be that way if he is the President. I also remember that Reagan said we must
    ultimately pull together Oh, and I don’t take cheap shots. When it comes to speaking my mind, I sometimes have a hard time with being even slightly confrontational. Most pisces do.

  103. #103
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:51 pm, madchef said:

    I see a candy cane fence with gumdrop trails, windmill powered cars, free abortions and a gay pride parade every sunday. Cabinet positions for our pals Osama, Raul, Kim Jung Il and a 90% tax rate on the rich.

    God help us if either of these two get into the white house.

  104. #104
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:53 pm, TXRose said:

    Thank you MrScribbler.

  105. #105
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:55 pm, Jim M. said:

    Interesting “debate”.

    Obama played the rope a dope well - he has the lead so let Hil flail away.

    I think I figured out at least part of Clinton’s issue here. Every time she attacks the failed policies of George Bush, in most cases she is reminding people of the almost identical policies of her husband. Now that she is painting them as failed, no one really wants more of the same, and that’s what they see with Hillary.

    Both candidates are clueless as to what their ideas are going to cost. Let’s face it, if either Dem is elected, anyone earning over $80,000 a year will be taxed at 100% so their earnings can be distrubuted to the “middle class”. Indentured servitude for high achievers!

    Like slick Willie’s “millionaire tax” that somehow became a tax on anyone in the low six figures (guess that’s an Arkansas millionaire. Not to be confused with the Arkansas “hello”, which apparently is extended with one’s pants around one’s ankles).

  106. #106
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:55 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Ignatius Reilly~

    You misread TXRose: what you quoted she said in sarcasm. Let’s try again, in complete context:

    I can honestly say that no matter what I think of McCain, I
    will not not vote for him
    and let them get into office with me sitting there saying, “Well,
    I don’t like McCain. My candidate didn’t get the nomination so I’m going to act like the
    Dems have been acting for over 7 years. It’s my turn to throw a temper tantrum.”

    I don’t view holding my nose and voting McCain in the General as voting for him just because he’s GOP. I’m looking at it as a vote AGAINST socialism, which is where Obama/Hillary wants to take us…

  107. #107
    On February 21st, 2008 at 10:56 pm, PhillytoDC said:

    “She demagogues about children being left without parents. Babies left without parents.”

    Yeah, I wish they would have reminded Clinton of her husband’s policy concerning Elio González… we could have combined the immigration and Cuba issues and saved ourselves 15 minutes of teeth-gnashing.

  108. #108
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:00 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    Mr. Scribbler, I do not criticize you or TXRose for concluding that the greatest good (or least evil) is to vote for McCain. But if you are defending TXRose’s cheap attribution of motive (I’m just ticked off because my candidate didn’t win) then you are as misguided as she is.

    But I don’t think you really are defending her arrogant attribution of infantile motives to other conservative voters. Your post seemed to want to take a hard whack at me in defense of TXRose, with whom you are in solidarity on your decision to vote for McCain. But you really didn’t go straight at my criticism of TXRose’s post, which was not her voting decision. She might not respect my decision, but I respect her. I just don’t respect her cheap shot at those who disagree.

  109. #109
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:06 pm, TXRose said:

    Thank you Miss Ladybug but there was another not in that sentence. I will vote for
    McCain. I will hold my nose if I have to, but I will not play games with my vote for the
    president because 4 or 8 years of Hillary or Obama ( and that husband of hers and that
    wife of his) turns my stomach. I have always told my friends that do not vote, that they
    cannot gripe. Same thing goes for me. Therefore, I have to vote GOP.

  110. #110
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:11 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    Miss Ladybug, I looked very carefully at TXRose’s post and, again, at your quoting of it. I did not misread it.

    She expressed — as her own thought process — the idea of voting against McCain because of disappointment at the defeat of one’s own favored candidate. And she explained that she rejected that sort of thinking.

    But the clear rhetorical purpose was to ascribe exactly that defective motive that she has rejected for herself as the motive for people who have, in fact, decided to vote against McCain.

  111. #111
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:16 pm, Ignatius Reilly said:

    TXRose, I think that what you said was unfortunate, and I took a hard shot it. I felt quite offended by it, as I explained.

    But, ultimately, I do recognize that you are a sincere conservative, and I hate to find myself so much at odds with people whom I should be marching beside.

    Maybe I was a little more hostile than I should have been in taking exception to your remark. Good luck.

  112. #112
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:18 pm, TXRose said:

    Apparently I have inadvertently touched a sore spot here. Trust me, I respect your decision if it is made honestly and with a good deal of thought. I did not mean to make
    you feel badly about your decision. I am only telling you what I have heard from an
    awful lot of Republicans. “If the person that I wanted to get in doesn’t make it, and if
    McCain does, I will not vote for McCain because he is not as conservative as I want him to
    be or whatever.” As I have said before, I used to know Juan Hernandez and I don’t trust
    him as far as I can throw him and at 5′, 100#s, that wouldn’t be far. But I do think that we
    will fare much better with McCain in the White House than the alternative, I am sorry if
    you feel less than good at this point. Maybe a warm bath and glass of warm milk and it
    will all look better tomorrow.

  113. #113
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:20 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Ignatius Reilly~

    Then I misinterpreted the point you were trying to make. Sorry about that…

    But, I have heard (well, “seen” on various threads around the internet) people make that very argument: their candidate of choice didn’t make it, and they’ll be damned if they vote for McCain, even if it means we get HRC or BO as president.

  114. #114
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:22 pm, TXRose said:

    Thank you Ignatius and I love your name, by the way. I truly did not mean to offend
    you. I sometimes forget that being the oldest child in the family has left me with an
    unfortunate tendency to lecture. We are all conservatives and should be working in
    concert.
    And, on that note, I am going to take my own advice. A warm bath (never could
    stand warm milk) and I will call it a night.

  115. #115
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:24 pm, TXRose said:

    Exactly my point, Miss Ladybug, and a goodnight to you. See you on another
    thread. I’ll let you know what I find at the polls tomorrow.

  116. #116
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:31 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:38 pm, DougT said:
    Why is UT Brownsville partly in Mexico?

    Because Brownsville is on the Southern tip of Reconquistaville, of South Texas, right on the border - and they felt it very muy important imortante to OUTREACH.

  117. #117
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:33 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    ooops!!!

    That would be “importante”. “muy importante”….pardone moi. er, escuse’ moi - oops, por favor, senor y senoras

  118. #118
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:34 pm, Miss Ladybug said:

    Ombre Rose~

    You may not have read all the comments, so I’ll fill you in if that is the case. The campus isn’t partly in Mexico; the way DHS has decided to build the fence (in a ways from the actual border) would place part of the campus south of the border fence…

  119. #119
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:38 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:43 pm, AlturaCt said:
    How can Democrats complain of “special interest” with a straight face?

    How can Hillary comment that SHE has been through ROUGH BATTLES in her life? All of them center around Bill and his feloneous and adulterous behavior, as well as some feloneous behavior of her own - all problems they brought on themselves, and those that he brought on her FOR WHICH SHE DECIDED TO STICK WITH HIM FOR THE PURPOSES OF HER OWN PERSONAL GAIN.

    And she kept a straight face and moved on QUICKLY, before her audience REMEMBERED what all her personal battles were REALLY all about!

  120. #120
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:47 pm, Alphonse said:

    Democrats See Strength in Latino Primary

    The growth of support for Democrats among Hispanics in Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico could provide the edge that would deliver more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win the White House, according to the NDN, a New Democrat organization.

  121. #121
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:47 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:34 pm, Miss Ladybug said:
    Ombre Rose~

    You may not have read all the comments, so I’ll fill you in if that is the case. The campus isn’t partly in Mexico; the way DHS has decided to build the fence (in a ways from the actual border) would place part of the campus south of the border fence…

    Thanks - yeah, I do stick my foot in it from time to time. And I did assume without reading all the comments - based on some talk in our area - lots of kids around here go there - but I haven’t been to that campus myself in about 20 years, and it has grown an awful lot since then.

    I knew a few years ago they had a lot of experimental farming going on in Mexico and in South America, too, and I just jumped to conclusions.

    Sorry.

    But the Southern tip of Texas is heavily smothered in Reconquistas, and thus is the BLUE section of the State on the Elections map, save for Austin, pretty much, these days - and a thin, broken line along our border, and a splash around the Houston area.

    BTW, my mom watched these debates tonight, and concludes she will vote for [Obama] - she has voted Conservative, all her life, as far as I know, as far as I had ever been told by her, before.

    She really hates McCain, though.

    Frankly, I would expect her to be more likely to do that, than for her to try to remember the name of a good Conservative and bother to write it in.

  122. #122
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:55 pm, countrybumpkin said:

    This little idea keeps bubbling up, that Obama will be another Carter, totally clueless once he gets the job and Dems and Repubs alike will limit his stupidity and throw him out after one term.

    After all, we had to endure Carter to get Reagan. Could it happen again?

  123. #123
    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:57 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 8:57 pm, docflash said:

    McCain has already said RECENTLY, when backed into a corner, that if it is revived, and they put it on his desk, HE WILL SIGN IT - AS IS.

    He didn’t get NUTHIN’! He just got a NEW DICTIONARY.

    Haven’t you heard him SAY that HIS BILL DID NOT GIVE “AMNESTY”??? ~~~After all, there is a “FINE” involved!~~~

  124. #124
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:04 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:28 pm, tarpon said:
    I have somehow lost my place, can you clarify which is the Marxist and which is the Stalinist?

    Easy - all three are BOTH.

    Remember, the laws that the Senators Hillary and Obama are voting for that we despise them for are all written by McCain.

  125. #125
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:09 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:56 pm, zorro said:
    Rose, I’m sorry. There is no temper tantrum here, just principles.

    You are confusing me no end, little fox.

    There are at least 3 may be 4 different “Rose” persons on Michelle’s forums.
    SO LOL!
    Well, I can easily see that I am not the one you are talking to.

    I ain’t gonna vote for McCain, either.

    I still don’t see any evidence that he is “Right” of the Dim candidates, one iota!

    I believe he is fully capable of doing twice as much damage as all of them put together.

    After all, they don’t get that much done, now, unless he pulls out his legislation and his Gang of 14 to give them the necessary nudges.

  126. #126
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:14 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 11:55 pm, countrybumpkin said:

    Better idea than it is to think that once McCain gets to his most independent position in his life, that he would suddenly do a lifetime career reversal and start listening to Conservatives and do what is RIGHT instead of what is STALINIST on the old agenda adopted by the DIM PLATFORM committee.

    He chose his direction in his last Senate Election in Arizona when he spit in the eyes of the Arizona GOP, did as he wished and was handily voted in by DIM CROSSOVERS who preferred him to the Dim candidate running against him.

    If I’m not mistaken, that Dim candidate was a Coors and that would make him undoubtedly a relative of Cindy’s. ???

  127. #127
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:22 am, Paul-Cincy said:

    Hillary said “change that you can Xerox”

    AFAIK, Obama ripped off the phrase “just words”, everything else was a famous quote, e.g. I have a dream, We hold these truths to be self-evident, We have nothing to fear but fear itself.

  128. #128
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:29 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 21st, 2008 at 9:48 pm, TXRose said:
    You all that are not going to vote for McCain might as well say hello to a socialist country.

    I’m in southWest Texas - those of you that intend to vote for McCain - say hello to a Socialist nation.

    Compare McCain Feingold Thompson to, say, The Stamp Act.

    I have trouble differentiating McCain from Santa Anna after some of the funerals for several diffferent folks from an assortment of local families here - of the ones NOT INVOLVED in illegal activities with local coyotes.

    and in the whole thread, references to problems in some areas due to teh the fence being plotted well away from the literal physical border — well, there are many kinds of accomodations to fit some solitary or rare private problems - but most would be solved if America h ad the balls to call the border what it is, instead of conceding a mile or more deep to Mexico - all things considered. As far as I am concerned, given the entire history, if the fence deviates from the actual border - let the cost be to the MEXICO side, not the American side - considering all those gun battles on OUR SIDE of the border, and tunnels, and etc. - broken fences, stolen cattle, and other, etc, et al…

    After all, if they took care of their own side of it as well as they do their own SOUTHERN border, considering the billions of American tax payer dollars that American politicians have gifted them without strings or accountability for….

    No vote for McCain.

    Anyone see Ann Coulter’s latest column?

  129. #129
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:43 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On February 22nd, 2008 at 12:22 am,

    Paul-Cincy said:
    Hillary said “change that you can Xerox”

    AFAIK, Obama ripped off the phrase “just words”, everything else was a famous quote, e.g. I have a dream, We hold these truths to be self-evident, We have nothing to fear but fear itself.

    Speaking of PLAGERISM —
    Remember that health care package Hillary tried to shove down our throats in ‘93 - anyone remember Rush giving the proof AT THE TIME THAT IT WAS MASS PUBLISHED AT GOVT EXPENSE, just on SPECULATION, that she lifted it lock stock and barrel from a UNIVERSITY project?

  130. #130
    On February 22nd, 2008 at 2:44 am, xblade said:

    Nope, no more holding my nose to vote. I’ve done that too many times and am not going to do it ever again.

    Fine, but keep your trap shut when this country becomes the newest socialist utopia, all because you and a lot of other clueless people think the only alternative to not getting everything you want in a candidate is to get everything you