<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nancy Pelosi gets cozy with lobbyists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-254496</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-254496</guid>
		<description>AC/Barry:

Is it too late to suggest term limits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AC/Barry:</p>
<p>Is it too late to suggest term limits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-254485</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-254485</guid>
		<description>Dug:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And you don’t see the resemblance between San Fran Nan and Jabba?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes... there is that prune appearance that is represented within both of them. However, I think Jabba is more loveable (who wouldn&#039;t want him for a dad). Now, SanFran Nan, ehhh, she&#039;s like the mother who constantly nags you and lectures you about why you never call but always wants a kiss and a hug after the exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dug:</p>
<blockquote><p>And you don’t see the resemblance between San Fran Nan and Jabba?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes&#8230; there is that prune appearance that is represented within both of them. However, I think Jabba is more loveable (who wouldn&#8217;t want him for a dad). Now, SanFran Nan, ehhh, she&#8217;s like the mother who constantly nags you and lectures you about why you never call but always wants a kiss and a hug after the exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-254265</link>
		<dc:creator>walterc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-254265</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Raging Republican said: 
This is the major underlying problem with our government…. career politicians . . . &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&#039;nuf said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Raging Republican said:<br />
This is the major underlying problem with our government…. career politicians . . . </p></blockquote>
<p>&#8216;nuf said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253942</link>
		<dc:creator>garyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253942</guid>
		<description>LGM I am not defending sinful GOP sinners but Nancy did say she was going to have the MOST ethical congress ever. Now I noticed she has not mentioned that word &quot;ethical&quot; either much lately. Maybe Nancy and her friends think ethics is like sin  ,,, its all relative to who you are  and what you think. You agree with that too LGM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGM I am not defending sinful GOP sinners but Nancy did say she was going to have the MOST ethical congress ever. Now I noticed she has not mentioned that word &#8220;ethical&#8221; either much lately. Maybe Nancy and her friends think ethics is like sin  ,,, its all relative to who you are  and what you think. You agree with that too LGM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253882</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253882</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Larraby&lt;/strong&gt; said (#39):

&lt;blockquote&gt;I wrote to Jim Ruttenberg of the NY Times, the lead write on the McCain slime piece, and asked him the following: When you are writing an article about how Barack Obama took healthy campaign contributions from the nuclear power industry and then did the bidding of the nuclear industry in the US Senate? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Show me a specific letter Obama wrote to a federal regulator threatening him if he did not do a specific favor for a specific client.  That&#039;s what McCain did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Larraby</strong> said (#39):</p>
<blockquote><p>I wrote to Jim Ruttenberg of the NY Times, the lead write on the McCain slime piece, and asked him the following: When you are writing an article about how Barack Obama took healthy campaign contributions from the nuclear power industry and then did the bidding of the nuclear industry in the US Senate? </p></blockquote>
<p>Show me a specific letter Obama wrote to a federal regulator threatening him if he did not do a specific favor for a specific client.  That&#8217;s what McCain did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larraby</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253722</link>
		<dc:creator>Larraby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253722</guid>
		<description>I wrote to Jim Ruttenberg of the NY Times, the lead write on the McCain slime piece, and asked him the following: When you are writing an article about how Barack Obama took healthy campaign contributions from the nuclear power industry and then did the bidding of the nuclear industry in the US Senate? I asked him when he was going to write an article about Chuck Schumer&#039;s campaign contributions from the hedge fund industry and then introduced nice legislation for the hedge fund guys? I asked him when he was going to write an article about all of Chris Dodd&#039;s contributions from the scecurities industry and Senator Dodd&#039;s legislation that favored the securities industry? So far, he has not been willing to answer me. I think he is still trying to find some lipstick on  a napkin in John McCain&#039;s garbage cans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote to Jim Ruttenberg of the NY Times, the lead write on the McCain slime piece, and asked him the following: When you are writing an article about how Barack Obama took healthy campaign contributions from the nuclear power industry and then did the bidding of the nuclear industry in the US Senate? I asked him when he was going to write an article about Chuck Schumer&#8217;s campaign contributions from the hedge fund industry and then introduced nice legislation for the hedge fund guys? I asked him when he was going to write an article about all of Chris Dodd&#8217;s contributions from the scecurities industry and Senator Dodd&#8217;s legislation that favored the securities industry? So far, he has not been willing to answer me. I think he is still trying to find some lipstick on  a napkin in John McCain&#8217;s garbage cans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpodug</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253663</link>
		<dc:creator>cpodug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253663</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;emjem24 said: I always felt that Jabba was misunderstood. It’s really hard to get a break when you’re a &lt;em&gt;slug-like alien kingpin&lt;/em&gt; on a lawless planet.(emphasis added)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And you don&#039;t see the resemblance between San Fran Nan and Jabba?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>emjem24 said: I always felt that Jabba was misunderstood. It’s really hard to get a break when you’re a <em>slug-like alien kingpin</em> on a lawless planet.(emphasis added)</p></blockquote>
<p>And you don&#8217;t see the resemblance between San Fran Nan and Jabba?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253641</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253641</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 25th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, cpodug said: 

Not a problem - I forgot to link this when I posted my original comment. Sorry&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Okay.  I could have done without opening that link. *&lt;em&gt;shiver&lt;/em&gt;*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 25th, 2008 at 2:54 pm, cpodug said: </p>
<p>Not a problem &#8211; I forgot to link this when I posted my original comment. Sorry</p></blockquote>
<p>Okay.  I could have done without opening that link. *<em>shiver</em>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpodug</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253639</link>
		<dc:creator>cpodug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253639</guid>
		<description>Not a problem - I forgot to link &lt;a href=&quot;http://fair.weru.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/helen_thomas.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; when I posted my original comment. Sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a problem &#8211; I forgot to link <a href="http://fair.weru.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/helen_thomas.jpg" rel="nofollow">this</a> when I posted my original comment. Sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253636</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253636</guid>
		<description>Sorry CPODug, I meant &quot;dug.&quot; I wanted to get your name correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry CPODug, I meant &#8220;dug.&#8221; I wanted to get your name correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253634</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253634</guid>
		<description>Doug:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Barry - emjem, you don’t understand - she’s going for the Helen Thomas look - kind of like a cross between the Emperor(episode 6) and Jabba the Hut&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is a scary resemblance. I&#039;d rather go for the older &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ciaoromania.com/images/dracula_stocker.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Count Dracula Bram Stoker&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; version myself. Now, she does bear an alarming resemblance to the Emperor but to Jabba? I always felt that Jabba was misunderstood. It&#039;s really hard to get a break when you&#039;re a slug-like alien kingpin on a lawless planet. Poor Jabba....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug:</p>
<blockquote><p>Barry &#8211; emjem, you don’t understand &#8211; she’s going for the Helen Thomas look &#8211; kind of like a cross between the Emperor(episode 6) and Jabba the Hut</p></blockquote>
<p>There is a scary resemblance. I&#8217;d rather go for the older <a href="http://www.ciaoromania.com/images/dracula_stocker.jpg" rel="nofollow">Count Dracula Bram Stoker&#8217;s</a> version myself. Now, she does bear an alarming resemblance to the Emperor but to Jabba? I always felt that Jabba was misunderstood. It&#8217;s really hard to get a break when you&#8217;re a slug-like alien kingpin on a lawless planet. Poor Jabba&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253623</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253623</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 25th, 2008 at 2:34 pm, cpodug said: 

Barry - emjem, you don’t understand - she’s going for the Helen Thomas look - kind of like a cross between the Emperor(episode 6) and Jabba the Hut&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ahhhhh.  I guess even San Fran Nan has goals, huh?  :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 25th, 2008 at 2:34 pm, cpodug said: </p>
<p>Barry &#8211; emjem, you don’t understand &#8211; she’s going for the Helen Thomas look &#8211; kind of like a cross between the Emperor(episode 6) and Jabba the Hut</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahhhhh.  I guess even San Fran Nan has goals, huh?  <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253615</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253615</guid>
		<description>Mr. Vibeman:

Love your list:

&lt;blockquote&gt;“D”isgruntled
“D”aft
“D”eadbeat
“D”reary
“D”iabolical
“D”isagreeable
“D”isarticulate
“D”oddering
“D”odgy
“D”ubious
“D”ullard
and
“D”uffer

(among others)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For your consideration might I add the following:

&quot;D&quot;elirious
&quot;D&quot;ecadent
&quot;D&quot;enying/nier
&quot;D&quot;amning/ed
&quot;D&quot;eluded
&quot;D&quot;eficient
&quot;D&quot;egenerate
&quot;D&quot;ense
&quot;D&quot;epressing
&quot;D&quot;ehydrated
&quot;D&quot;evious
&quot;D&quot;isturbed
&quot;D&quot;eflated
&quot;D&quot;omineering
&quot;D&quot;ispeptic

This is fun. Are we limited to just &quot;D&quot; words?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Vibeman:</p>
<p>Love your list:</p>
<blockquote><p>“D”isgruntled<br />
“D”aft<br />
“D”eadbeat<br />
“D”reary<br />
“D”iabolical<br />
“D”isagreeable<br />
“D”isarticulate<br />
“D”oddering<br />
“D”odgy<br />
“D”ubious<br />
“D”ullard<br />
and<br />
“D”uffer</p>
<p>(among others)</p></blockquote>
<p>For your consideration might I add the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;D&#8221;elirious<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;ecadent<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;enying/nier<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;amning/ed<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;eluded<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;eficient<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;egenerate<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;ense<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;epressing<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;ehydrated<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;evious<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;isturbed<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;eflated<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;omineering<br />
&#8220;D&#8221;ispeptic</p>
<p>This is fun. Are we limited to just &#8220;D&#8221; words?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpodug</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253612</link>
		<dc:creator>cpodug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253612</guid>
		<description>Barry - emjem, you don&#039;t understand - she&#039;s going for the Helen Thomas look - kind of like a cross between the Emperor(episode 6) and Jabba the Hut</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry &#8211; emjem, you don&#8217;t understand &#8211; she&#8217;s going for the Helen Thomas look &#8211; kind of like a cross between the Emperor(episode 6) and Jabba the Hut</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-253597</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/25/nancy-pelosi-gets-cozy-with-lobbyists/#comment-253597</guid>
		<description>Barry:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, obviously, that Botox needs to be recalled. Just look how ineffective it was. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know she scares the hell out of me. This is probably why she&#039;s leaning on big pharma. All their latest age-defying medications are being tested on her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry:</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, obviously, that Botox needs to be recalled. Just look how ineffective it was. </p></blockquote>
<p>I know she scares the hell out of me. This is probably why she&#8217;s leaning on big pharma. All their latest age-defying medications are being tested on her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

