The Las Vegas ricin case: Man in coma ID’d as Roger Von Bergendorff

Photo screenshot via FoxNews.com
The Las Vegas Review-Journal obtained a DHS document with new details about the men connected to the bizarre ricin case. The man in a coma has been identified as Roger Von Bergendorff. The man who claimed to be Von Bergendorff’s “relative” who discovered the ricin vials in Von Bergendorff’s motel room has been identified as Thomas Tholen.
Las Vegas police spokesman Bill Cassell said Von Bergendorff “is not considered a criminal suspect.”
Lombardo said: “I don’t want to make any conclusions with the anarchist-type textbook. It doesn’t make you a terrorist because you have this type textbook. It doesn’t make you a terrorist if you possess firearms.”
Police said Von Bergendorff had a misdemeanor arrest several years ago but would release no other details until the ricin investigation is completed.
Suey said the suite was registered to the man, but she did not know how long he had stayed in the suite before his hospitalization.
…Suey said police do not know whether the former occupant of the hotel suite manufactured or possessed the substance. “Might he be a victim?” a reporter asked. “That’s possible,” she said.
Suey said people could have any number of reasons for wanting to make ricin.
“It could be experimental just to see if they can,” she said.
The last time Las Vegas police dealt with ricin was in 2003, when a 60-year-old man died after injecting himself with the poison.
***
CDC’s ricin health advisory.
Ricin and the umbrella murder.
The London 2003 ricin scare.
South Carolina 2003 ricin incident.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Ricin, anarchist book, and firearms in Vegas motel « nuke gingrich
- The Ricin toting moron an Anarchist? | BitsBlog
- GINA COBB
- Red Alerts
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Homeland Security

Stop The ACLU
» The Treacherous Patriot
Hot Air
» Hillary bets short on Obama?
Belmont Club
» Obama and the Swan
Gateway Pundit
» Call off the Kooks... MEDIA MISTRANSLATES MALIKI!
Hotline On Call
» Gore Makes Surprise Visit To Netroots Nation
Gateway Pundit
» Democrats Nix Gas Tax Holiday-- Offer Gas Tax Hike Instead

NewsBusters.org
» Bozell Column: A Guide to the Movie Galaxy
NewsBusters.org
» Hannity to Obama: Do You Have The Guts To Come On My Show?

protein wisdom
» Medicrap [Dan Collins]








Unbelievable! How many cases have school-children been accused of being “terrorists” because in their young anger they have a list of people they want to harm? Or if they even so much as draw a gun on a piece of paper?
Yet when we have the evidence of: a) ricin, b) anarchist-cookbook (which I bet explains how to make ricin) and c) a firearm… “he’s not a terrorist!”.
Maybe they should check his belongings and find his “list”. Our country is run by idiots at all levels.
I don’t mean to make light of school threats, I think its just annoying when school children are treated more harsh than someone who looks to pose a bigger threat. I know that my friends and I always joked about our “list” when we were in school (people must not remember Billy Madison)… but now if a student makes a “list” even without other threats, or even attempts to purchase a firearm they are branded “terrorist” right off the bat.
It’s like the police went to the Wiggum school of police…
Certainly she cannot be serious.
I have to agree. Ricin is not something you make “just to see if you can,” considering that 200-500 milligrams can kill an adult.
The possibility that this is some sort of test run to see what the authorities will do when cannot be discarded, but Occam’s razor seems to demand that this guy was possibly a terrorist of some sort, and intended to use the ricin he had.
All true, but ricin is a completely different case, covered by neither the First or Second Amendments. It is a bioweapon of the first order, especially so since there is no antidote to its poisoning.
This story could become a Keystone episode in a minute flat. All the authorities have to do is let the Homeyland Insecurity Department in on the investigation.
Let’s see, deadly poisons, no Koran but a copy of the Anarchist’s Cookbook.
Moonbat.
Also, I don’t think the Anarchist Cookbook contains a chapter on ricin. At least not any of the versions I just downloaded in the past 20 minutes. Not to mention you have to be pretty hard-core to print out an Anarchist-type cookbook and then tab it to the ricin section.
Well, yeah. Just the other day I was concocting a little ricin, along with a side of nerve gas. I get bored from time to time and just feel the need to experiment with my chemisty set.
/sarcasm off
What a moronic statement.
Hummm…? Plan a vacation to Las Vegas.
Arrive and check-in to a suite. Go shopping for chemicals listed for the “Ricin” recipe. Make what is suppose to be ricin. Next step, TEST it to see if the recipe for killing tens of thousands works! The Las Vegas Police do not seem to have a “clue” about the implications of the incident! As for me, I am searching for the plans for an underground bunker ASAP! Any ideas about where to order the plans for one??
“If it walks like a duck and if it quakes like a duck…”
One report I listened to on FNC mentioned that the hotel was in the vicinity of a water treatment plant or something of that nature.
Las Vegas is nothing without tourist. I would expect the authorities and local media to low ball the coverage as long as they can.
I have not done a search using the name above, I wonder if that is his real ID…
This sure destroys my faith in the CSI-Las Vegas series. I’ll never believe again they can solve an outrageous crime in under an hour.
I suspected a “rat” when I first read the story. There is something very suspicious about all this. Well, I’m not going there anytime soon, so I just wait and see how this “circus” is going to turn out. Makes another movie plot, for sure, or another tv episode.
Fox news said this morning that a dog was in the room also. I don’t recall if the dog is sick too.
L
Well I guess this means O.J.s going to walk, givin the competencey level of Las Vagas law inforcement.
When I first saw the headline on this all I could think of in this case was it was someone wanting to get involved in the terrorist business and had accidentally poisoned himself. With the clues provided to the nuclear physicist in law enforcement you would think someone might be raising a couple of red flags over this incident. I guess what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas especially when it might hurt the tourist trade. Nothing to see here move along.
And after you have made it you need to test it. Just how do you go about that? Send it to an expensive lab? Not too smart. Try it on a neighbor? Again not too smart. I know, travel to Las Vegas and leave it in a motel room. The LVPD will test it and the press will even report the purity. All free of charge and with little or no chance of getting caught.
They keep saying vials (plural) but have not said how many. It was also reprted that there was a dog and 2 cats in the room and that the dog was dead.
Las Vegas gets huge numbers of tourists. If I was a terrorist, I would target the buffets, they are usually away from the casino floor and the surveilance cameras. Every casino has one, they could infect thousands in a day.
The “anarchist-cookbook”?? Hmmmm, & in the same week as those nice people from the “Weathermen” up in Chicago make the news?? Hmmmm…
A Conservative might look at this and say, “How refreshing that law enforcement aren’t rushing to try the deceased in the court of public opinion for a change.” And since when are bio-weapons not covered by the 2nd Amendment? Because they’re not used for hunting?
The government of the United States derives all of its powers from its people. The government cannot derive a right from its people that the people do not possess.
I agree that this situation looks very suspicious, and I’m not thrilled that people are making ricin, but let’s remember that we aren’t there, we aren’t looking at raw data, and we do have a constitutional procedure to follow in order to find the truth. Let’s leave the jumping to conclusions to the moonbats.
I just want to throw this out without comment:
Didn’t the liberals fight against such measures as the Patriot Act because they were afraid the gov’t was going to be observing what books people check out at the local library?
If that’s the case, why is any book mentioned in this story?
Both Tholen and Von Bergendorff have listings in the state of UT. If related, how did Tholen become aware of Von Bergendorff’s illness and location in LV? . . .or was Tholen already in LV? coincidence? How did they travel to LV?
Several viles of ricin in a bag
+
two cats and a dog left unattended for weeks (think of the stench! - yet this article claims Tholen alerted the hotel to the existence of the animals - guess room service ain’t what it used to be)
and yet the bag containing castor beans & several ricin viles remained unmolested by these starving animals?
No mention of a computer or cell phone. Lot’s and lots of questions.
Wierd, huh?
According to an AP report, the dog was found dead in the room:
No evidence of terrorism at all? Oh really? The ricin was only for his own consumption? Or maybe he was just doing cancer research in his room. How stupid do they think we are?
Does anyone else notice a trend here? Every investigation into cases like this begins with something like “we don’t know what the motive was, but we can assure you that it was not terrorism.” If you don’t know the motive, you can’t rule out terrorism!
A similar thing happened in Salt Lake City about a year ago. A few hours after Sulejman Talović shot up a mall full of people shopping for Valentine’s Day, the FBI announced to the press that they had not discovered the motive for the killings but they knew that it was not terrorism.
A year later the investigators released their final report. They still did not know what the motive was, but they could tell us what it wasn’t:
Again, if you don’t know what the motive was, how can you tell us what it wasn’t? A man shoots up a mall killing and wounding complete strangers and he wasn’t trying to terrorize anyone?
There seems to be an effort to deceive/calm the public because they think we are all hate filled bigots who will turn into vigilantes if we know the truth. But if we find out they are not telling us the whole story, how will we be able to trust them in the future? And, if their number one goal is political correctness, how can we depend on them to protect us? It seems that all we can do is hope that the next would-be-terrorist is stupid enough to test his ricin, suicide belt, or some other weapon on himself, first, to make sure it works.
Here’s a summary of the Trolley Square shooting for those who are unfamiliar with it:
Re: Papa Louie, “How stupid do they think we are?”
Pretty darn stupid… complete morons actually.
What I find interesting is the presence of the “anarchist-cookbook” … It hasn’t come up for a while…obviously this guy was up to no good, could it be related to the election???
“This story could become a Keystone episode in a minute flat.”
Actually it’s already been a CSI episode (or at least something like it — in “Caged,” a victim accidentally poisoned herself with the ricin she was going to use to poison someone else).
Come on, bloggers, the guy’s a petty, albeit dangerous, criminal, not a terrorist. If he had some islamic connection, or even name, one might suspect otherwise, but he’s just some Las Vegas low-life.
Not so fast Palani. Remember our 9/11 friends had Las Vegas connections. But…no doubt this is just another Goose Creek episode–nothing to see here folks, just firecrackers, innocent college kids. Just a man and his dog & cat…ho hum..our children will sleep good tonight because lettuce head Chernof has his cell phone connected to the virtual Mexico fence!
Sorry, I didn’t know Islam owned the patent on terrorism. It sounds like you know this guy very well to say that he has no connection to terrorism. Or, are you just making that assumption based on his name?
If Roger Von Bergendorff had succeeded in poisoning thousands of people in Vegas for no reason other than to cause anarchy and panic, he would still be a terrorist in my book, even if he acted alone. Petty, low-life criminals can still be terrorists if they attempt to kill large numbers of people they don’t know with the objective of creating terror.
Of course, he may have just been depressed and decided to end it all. Perhaps he wanted to die a slow, painful death while reading the Anarchist Cookbook. And he went to the trouble of making far more ricin than he needed just to “see if he could.”
Considering that it is highly unlikely that the ricin was made in the motel room, one has to wonder how much more is in the hands of persons unknown.
Even a couple of grams could kill thousands of people.
The active poison in castor seeds is ricin (RYE-sin), a very deadly protein called a lectin. Ricin is found in the meal or cake after the oil has been extracted. Those who occasionally take castor oil may be assured that ricin does not occur in the pure oil. When a gram of ricin is compared with equivalent weights of other toxic substances, it turns out to be one of our deadliest natural poisons. It has been estimated that, gram for gram, ricin is 6,000 times more poisonous than cyanide and 12,000 times more poisonous than rattlesnake venom. Ricin mixed with food and used as bait is highly toxic to certain pest animals, such as some rodents and insects. E. A. Weiss (1971) states that a dose of 0.035 milligram (approximately one millionth of an ounce) may kill a man, and even small particles in open sores and in the eyes may prove fatal. According to the Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals (1997), a dose of ricin weighing only 70 micrograms or two millionths of an ounce (roughly equivalent to the weight of a single grain of table salt from a salt shaker) is enough to kill a 160 pound person.
Well, while others have answered palani, I’ll add my 1/2 cent worth.
The OK City Bombing was carried out by two pastey white guys named Nichols and McVeigh. They weren’t Muslim.
The Unabomber was a former Berkely Math Professor.
E.L.F. and the other idiot animal rights “persons of interest” aren’t Muslim, either.
Do I need to go on here? While the cookbook, the gun, and maybe even the Ricin could be explained away individually, found together and in a Vegas hotel room really smells. The gov’t shouldn’t say yet that we know there is no terrorism invloved.
Too many assumptions and unanswered questions. The press is assuming that the guy’s identity is that mysteriously found in a Homeland Security report.
What was strange from the beginning is that the authorities refused to disclose the identity of the individual. Even stranger is that everyone at the hotel and the parent company clamed up. No information from hospital sources. No police contacts saying a word. No one is talking.
Also, there has been no description of the man released. If this was a 50 year old white guy I think that information would have been released.
No link to terrorism? While all of us travel with ricin, WMD instructions, multiple pets and 4 firearms, you think they would be treating this as terrorism related until they could positively exclude it.
Let’s not forget that Al Qaeda has published ricin making instructions. And captured tapes early in the Afghanistan war showed the use of small animals used by Al Qaeda to test the potency and effect of their chemical and biological mixtures. And that there are many European muslims (”lilly whites”) that Al Qaeda has recruited into their fold.
Granted, this could be some depressed chemist who is missing a few cards from his deck. But the fact that no one with any information is talking to anyone from the press makes that possibility less believable as time goes on. What else did they find in the room, who did the guy talk to, what was he doing in Vegas, where was he getting his money, was he paying all of his bills in cash? Lots of questions without answers.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal has a few more details I found interesting:
The police found the anarchist textbook that was tabbed to a section on ricin on Tuesday. This prompted them to test the room for ricin, but no one noticed the bag of castor beans and ricin vials until the “relative” showed up on Thursday. How big is this hotel room, anyway?
Do you think their main concern is to inform the public, or is it to assure the public so we feel safe to come spend our money in Las Vegas?
I can’t say for sure that this man intended to harm anyone. But until a reasonable explanation for the ricin is given, I’m not going to be as quick to rule out terrorism as the Vegas police seem to be.
Re: almeehan, Papa Louie, SHoward
Sorry, but two “pastey white guys”, the Unabomber, and some animal rights persons are not terrorists, and neither are violent abortion opponents. Terrorism involves attacking the innocent because the true targets are too formidable to attack directly. A government entity cannot be a victim of terrorism - rebellion, yes, insurrection, yes, but not terrorism. Nichols and McVeigh had a grudge against the U.S., and bombed a federal facility, not a civilian office complex such as the World Trade Center. They were insurrectionists, were caught and punished appropriately. The Unabomber was a deranged loner, as are many serial killers. Animal rights activists have targeted the places where they believe harm is being done, not some outdoor market filled with innocent shoppers.
While I’ll agree that there can be single cell terrorists, in general they are part of semi-organized groups and are pursuing political objectives through fear, mayhem, and intimidation.
palani, maybe you are right that an anarchist can’t be a terrorist in the strict definition of the word, unless he is part of an organized group, but then he wouldn’t really be an anarchist. I don’t understand why the distinction is so important. I really don’t care if someone attempts to murder large numbers of innocent people because he is a terrorist, an insurrectionist, or simply a psychopathic mass-murderer. The end result can be the same.
Palani, I’ll buy your explanation about McVeigh and Nichols. I agree, in fact. One point about that is that our gov’t and most of the population consider them terrorists. Why then would the same gov’t pronounce this guy in Vegas not a terrorist? As Papa Louie just alluded to, it’s a pretty fine distinction.
Now, the animal rights wackos, I’m not agreeing with you there. These people are terrorists. They are attacking people in an effort to scare them into stopping some action they are opposed to.
And the Unabomber? Not a terrorist? He was absolutely against the very foundation of our culture, but could not assault the gov’t, Wall Street, or really any size target, so he went after individuals that had done him no harm. He’s the very definition of a terrorist.
A terrorist does not have to belong to any group. He can be alone and act alone. There doesn’t necessarily have to be an organized political reason. If the purpose is to scare people into doing something, or to attack innocent people for no logical reason, that is a terrorist.
Ricin…Hmmm, real smart!
This moron could be acting entirely on his own. Ricin is very lethal stuff.
He is quite obviously dangerous to both Himself and Others.
I read a previous post about a 2nd Amendment application of Ricin. I can assure that there is absolutely NONE.
The 2nd Amendment covers FIREARMS, not Chemical Weapons or WMDs.
The presence of an Anarchist Handbook makes Him neither An Anarchist or a Terrorist. The presence of Ricin makes him both very stupid and very dangerous.
Re: Papa Louie, SHoward #36 and #37
The distinction between a murderous criminal and a terrorist is important because, without it, those who oppose the war on terror use your examples as excuses to not toughen our laws and approach to a very different type of threat. Sure, almost any violent criminal can frighten and “terrorize”, but overusing the “terrorist” characterization diminishes its impact. Consider how everything from health care to climate change is now a “crisis”.
A terrorist uses violence and intimidation to get his way, whether it’s a group directing terrorism at thousands or one loon going after a few selected targets. ETA in Spain targets politicians for car bombings and usually pre-warns authorities if it’s going to set off a (small) bomb somewhere. It’s nevertheless a terrorist organization.
Palani,
Top of the mornin’.
First I certainly agree 100% that making everything into a crisis is a problem itself. If everyone that owns a certain type of firearm, for example, can be called a terrorist, they can be dealt with harshly for no legitimate reason.
I still disagree on characterizing certain people as not terrorists. There are still different types of terrorists, as well as different reasons to terrorize. In fact, one reason the OK city bombers were considered terrorists is the fact that their target was not military. The Federal building may represent the government, but it contained purely civilian personel.
I see your point about not calling every bad act we see terror, but that doesn’t mean some of them aren’t. In this particular case, we still shouldn’t rule it out until we know more.
Re: SHoward
Good points, although I disagree that the Oklahoma City Federal building was really a civilian target. Definitely a gray area, but if the sign says it’s the government, then it’s the government.
In the broadest sense, every violent criminal is a terrorist, but by using the term judiciously, we maintain our essential focus. I disagree with much of what George Bush has done, but I do credit him for staying on target.
Let’s wait to see what happens in Vegas.
As mentioned on Saturday:
Authorities have extended their search to Utah
and San Diego, CA
snip