<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Touchy, touchy! McCain doesn&#8217;t like questions about his 2004 Kerry/VP chit-chat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:21:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: juliesa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-263257</link>
		<dc:creator>juliesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-263257</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I found articles by Kerry praising McCain, and by the daughter of the Keating from Keating Five trying to exonerate him and excoriate his attackers, and sites by Ted Sampley, Swift Boat Vets.

I didn’t find sites by fellow POWS seeking to exonerate McCain.
Or by former superior officers who remembered details of his record that passed through their hands, seeking to say, they couldn’t reveal facts they knew for a fact from his sealed documents but THEY KNOW that McCain is all he says he is, etc. et al….

But I think you will be shocked and stunned more by who is NOT defending McCain’s war record than by who IS.
Also why does he resembles Kerry in proudly proclaiming his “war hero status” while simultaneously SEALING HIS OWN WAR RECORDS.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Re: war record. Sorry, but it&#039;s apparent that you&#039;ve been hanging around the nutter sites. Ted Sampley is a charlatan. POW Medal of Honor awardees Admiral Stockdale and Colonel Day have written very favorably of McCain. 

Col. Day is the most decorated service member alive. My brother-in-law knows him personally. Col. Day is campaigning for McCain. They were cellmates in Hanoi for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I found articles by Kerry praising McCain, and by the daughter of the Keating from Keating Five trying to exonerate him and excoriate his attackers, and sites by Ted Sampley, Swift Boat Vets.</p>
<p>I didn’t find sites by fellow POWS seeking to exonerate McCain.<br />
Or by former superior officers who remembered details of his record that passed through their hands, seeking to say, they couldn’t reveal facts they knew for a fact from his sealed documents but THEY KNOW that McCain is all he says he is, etc. et al….</p>
<p>But I think you will be shocked and stunned more by who is NOT defending McCain’s war record than by who IS.<br />
Also why does he resembles Kerry in proudly proclaiming his “war hero status” while simultaneously SEALING HIS OWN WAR RECORDS.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Re: war record. Sorry, but it&#8217;s apparent that you&#8217;ve been hanging around the nutter sites. Ted Sampley is a charlatan. POW Medal of Honor awardees Admiral Stockdale and Colonel Day have written very favorably of McCain. </p>
<p>Col. Day is the most decorated service member alive. My brother-in-law knows him personally. Col. Day is campaigning for McCain. They were cellmates in Hanoi for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dartagnans_blade</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-263153</link>
		<dc:creator>dartagnans_blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-263153</guid>
		<description>LOL........Now I remember why I am not a republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;&#8230;..Now I remember why I am not a republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ombre Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombre Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262909</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 9th, 2008 at 8:30 am, dartagnans_blade said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m sure you would love it if there were no one left in America to counter all the votes FOR SOCIALISM that you &quot;MODERATES&quot; will post  under &quot;CONSERVATIVE COLORS&quot; under a candidate such as McCain, and salve your conscience with the little (R) by his name.

But those causes you claim as the excuse for your actions are false, since his actions don&#039;t justify your &quot;confidence&quot; that he will do the right thing.

You&#039;ve chosen your course - enjoy it!

You can call my course anything you like.

I&#039;m not voting for that Liberal Leftist Socialist just because you guys want to &quot;call&quot; him a &quot;moderate Republican&quot;.

Bambi calling a little skunk, &quot;Flower&quot; didn&#039;t make the little skunk smell any the sweeter, and you cannot dress McCain up as anything other than what he is - a self-centered, egotistical, self-important, pompous little smarmy would-be Napoleon. And a BFF of Hanoi John and Toady Chappaquiddick Kennedy.

And as I&#039;ve told you before - millions of Conservatives cannot be reached at all &quot;at this time&quot; to inform them of your very important opinion of them.

How distressing for you that they shall not be disturbed in the least by your little rantings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 9th, 2008 at 8:30 am, dartagnans_blade said: </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you would love it if there were no one left in America to counter all the votes FOR SOCIALISM that you &#8220;MODERATES&#8221; will post  under &#8220;CONSERVATIVE COLORS&#8221; under a candidate such as McCain, and salve your conscience with the little (R) by his name.</p>
<p>But those causes you claim as the excuse for your actions are false, since his actions don&#8217;t justify your &#8220;confidence&#8221; that he will do the right thing.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve chosen your course &#8211; enjoy it!</p>
<p>You can call my course anything you like.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not voting for that Liberal Leftist Socialist just because you guys want to &#8220;call&#8221; him a &#8220;moderate Republican&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bambi calling a little skunk, &#8220;Flower&#8221; didn&#8217;t make the little skunk smell any the sweeter, and you cannot dress McCain up as anything other than what he is &#8211; a self-centered, egotistical, self-important, pompous little smarmy would-be Napoleon. And a BFF of Hanoi John and Toady Chappaquiddick Kennedy.</p>
<p>And as I&#8217;ve told you before &#8211; millions of Conservatives cannot be reached at all &#8220;at this time&#8221; to inform them of your very important opinion of them.</p>
<p>How distressing for you that they shall not be disturbed in the least by your little rantings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dartagnans_blade</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262603</link>
		<dc:creator>dartagnans_blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262603</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You are proposing that WE ALL PUT THE LIFE OF OUR FAMILIES AND OUR NATION IN THE HANDS OF THIS MAN. AND THE STYLE OF GOVERNMENT WE LIVE UNDER, AS WELL.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Well guess what Ombre....you will never have the President you want, ever! America is not as cut and dried as that. We do not all toe the strict &quot;religious, social, fiscal and foreign&quot; lines you perhaps do. Your candidate will never be elected in the 50/50 world we live in. So where does that leave you? Look at Bush, is he conservative enough for you?, he was to sign shamnesty. How bout Reagan, he signed the first one. 

You go ahead and write in your candidate and ride off into the sunset on your high horse. I will vote for McCain with pleasure because I live here and now. I understand 4 or 8 years of supreme court choices could devastate this country. I understand the young men and women in the military need support not lip service, I understand the fiscal policies the others will employ now, not in some fantasyland perfect world. 

I would suggest you follow the thinking of so many fringe leftists....Buy a plane ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You are proposing that WE ALL PUT THE LIFE OF OUR FAMILIES AND OUR NATION IN THE HANDS OF THIS MAN. AND THE STYLE OF GOVERNMENT WE LIVE UNDER, AS WELL.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well guess what Ombre&#8230;.you will never have the President you want, ever! America is not as cut and dried as that. We do not all toe the strict &#8220;religious, social, fiscal and foreign&#8221; lines you perhaps do. Your candidate will never be elected in the 50/50 world we live in. So where does that leave you? Look at Bush, is he conservative enough for you?, he was to sign shamnesty. How bout Reagan, he signed the first one. </p>
<p>You go ahead and write in your candidate and ride off into the sunset on your high horse. I will vote for McCain with pleasure because I live here and now. I understand 4 or 8 years of supreme court choices could devastate this country. I understand the young men and women in the military need support not lip service, I understand the fiscal policies the others will employ now, not in some fantasyland perfect world. </p>
<p>I would suggest you follow the thinking of so many fringe leftists&#8230;.Buy a plane ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262601</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262601</guid>
		<description>... good grief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; good grief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dartagnans_blade</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262598</link>
		<dc:creator>dartagnans_blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262598</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you dare question my patriotism!
WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAA

Sound familiar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you dare question my patriotism!<br />
WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAA</p>
<p>Sound familiar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ombre Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262558</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombre Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262558</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 8th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, juliesa said: 
#70 ombre rose

Almost everything in your comment was incorrect. As the tired old saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Before I ever saw your post, I had stated that I urge all to do their own research as I can, or anyone else can &quot;at best, make mistakes&quot;.

But I have researched Mcain over and over for more than a DECADE.

And no, I have not read his book, but I have listened to HIM in a lot of his in-depth in terviews.

I have no obligation to accept his version of hte facts.

For instance, I have read what A lot of different people said about the incident HE BROUGHT BACK UP in South Carolina THIS YEAR when he announced his TURTH SQUAD because of what George W. Bush &quot;did to him&quot; in South Carolina in 2000, when McCain says Bush slandered him at that time so Bush could win the S.C. Primary.

Well, a lot of REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES have a VERY VERY VERY dIFFERENT VERSION of those events, and they include facts about an INVESTIGATION which Bush INSTANTLY COOPERATED WITH and gave enough evidence to CLEAR HIS OWN NAME. He then invited McCain to give evidence from his own campaign to either PROVE UP THE CHARGES AGAINST BUSH or to exonerate McCAIN from &quot;COUNTER&quot; slandering Bush - WHICH McCAIN INSTANTLY REFUSED TO DO.
The investigation cleared Bush, and revealed McCain&#039;s slander.

Ann Coulter reported recently in an update - since McCain brought it up.

I have watched the interviews of Ted Sampley and others when they were discussing Hanoi John and the defense of him given by McCain.

I am not entitled to my own facts - BUT NEITHER ARE YOU.
I am entitled to draw my own conclusions.

Furthermore, it is my experience of 56 years that there are ALWAYS CONSISTENCIES in any person&#039;s life.

And the CHARACTER you ascribe to McCain, I HAVE YET TO DISCOVER IN A SOCIALIST SUCH AS HIMSELF who is simultaneously capable of colluding with Toady Chappaquiddick Kennedy for SHAMNESTY, with Feingold and Thompson for McCAIN FEINGOLD THOMPSON, to stand and DEMAND a CRASH COURSE to TEACH AMERICANS TO STOP TORTURING TERRORISTS, and a hundred other things I have watched that mealy little smarmy person do the last 10-15 years IN COLLUSION WITH DIM PARTY SOCIALISTS TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF AMERICA. As well as to the HARM of the GOP!

FACT!: Robert Dole could NOT convince enough Conservatives that HE had the required character to be President, and ALL INDICATIONS are that McCain has a greater problem with that than Dole ever did.

NONE of the Conservative leadership came to ME to get MY MARCHING ORDERS for them on this issue!

I stand in excellent company in my assessment of McCain, and I stand in the company of people I have LEARNED IN THE TRENCHES to trust.

Something that CANNOT BE SAID of McCain&#039;s SHIPMATES about HIM.

I can produce evidence that the troopmates of Alvin C. York implicitly trusted him before Battle. I can also show evidence that the troopmates of Audie Murphy also trusted him, implicitly, before Battle.

You can show me NOTHING that shows where CONSERVATIVES can trust McCain to do anything but collude with DIM SOCIALISTS.

He ain&#039;t a man to ride the river with.
And he has established he is going in a direction I refuse.

You have blasted my character and my ability to assess the nature of a person&#039;s character - but you have NOT shown evidence that I am wrong in this particular instance.

You are entitled to vote for him if you are comfortable with him. 

You are on this earth to determine such things.

I welcome your choices. I encourage you to make them as strong choices as you can.

Meanwhile, I value the judgements of such as Rush Limbaugh and David Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin, Joe Arpaio, my own father, my brother-in-law, my nephew who earned his Silver Spurs in Iraq, and a lot of other folks.
Some of those will vote for McCain, because of the Party.
But looking at their faces as they announce this CHANGE in their stance....

I don&#039;t feel like jumping off a cliff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 8th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, juliesa said:<br />
#70 ombre rose</p>
<p>Almost everything in your comment was incorrect. As the tired old saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.</p></blockquote>
<p>Before I ever saw your post, I had stated that I urge all to do their own research as I can, or anyone else can &#8220;at best, make mistakes&#8221;.</p>
<p>But I have researched Mcain over and over for more than a DECADE.</p>
<p>And no, I have not read his book, but I have listened to HIM in a lot of his in-depth in terviews.</p>
<p>I have no obligation to accept his version of hte facts.</p>
<p>For instance, I have read what A lot of different people said about the incident HE BROUGHT BACK UP in South Carolina THIS YEAR when he announced his TURTH SQUAD because of what George W. Bush &#8220;did to him&#8221; in South Carolina in 2000, when McCain says Bush slandered him at that time so Bush could win the S.C. Primary.</p>
<p>Well, a lot of REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES have a VERY VERY VERY dIFFERENT VERSION of those events, and they include facts about an INVESTIGATION which Bush INSTANTLY COOPERATED WITH and gave enough evidence to CLEAR HIS OWN NAME. He then invited McCain to give evidence from his own campaign to either PROVE UP THE CHARGES AGAINST BUSH or to exonerate McCAIN from &#8220;COUNTER&#8221; slandering Bush &#8211; WHICH McCAIN INSTANTLY REFUSED TO DO.<br />
The investigation cleared Bush, and revealed McCain&#8217;s slander.</p>
<p>Ann Coulter reported recently in an update &#8211; since McCain brought it up.</p>
<p>I have watched the interviews of Ted Sampley and others when they were discussing Hanoi John and the defense of him given by McCain.</p>
<p>I am not entitled to my own facts &#8211; BUT NEITHER ARE YOU.<br />
I am entitled to draw my own conclusions.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it is my experience of 56 years that there are ALWAYS CONSISTENCIES in any person&#8217;s life.</p>
<p>And the CHARACTER you ascribe to McCain, I HAVE YET TO DISCOVER IN A SOCIALIST SUCH AS HIMSELF who is simultaneously capable of colluding with Toady Chappaquiddick Kennedy for SHAMNESTY, with Feingold and Thompson for McCAIN FEINGOLD THOMPSON, to stand and DEMAND a CRASH COURSE to TEACH AMERICANS TO STOP TORTURING TERRORISTS, and a hundred other things I have watched that mealy little smarmy person do the last 10-15 years IN COLLUSION WITH DIM PARTY SOCIALISTS TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF AMERICA. As well as to the HARM of the GOP!</p>
<p>FACT!: Robert Dole could NOT convince enough Conservatives that HE had the required character to be President, and ALL INDICATIONS are that McCain has a greater problem with that than Dole ever did.</p>
<p>NONE of the Conservative leadership came to ME to get MY MARCHING ORDERS for them on this issue!</p>
<p>I stand in excellent company in my assessment of McCain, and I stand in the company of people I have LEARNED IN THE TRENCHES to trust.</p>
<p>Something that CANNOT BE SAID of McCain&#8217;s SHIPMATES about HIM.</p>
<p>I can produce evidence that the troopmates of Alvin C. York implicitly trusted him before Battle. I can also show evidence that the troopmates of Audie Murphy also trusted him, implicitly, before Battle.</p>
<p>You can show me NOTHING that shows where CONSERVATIVES can trust McCain to do anything but collude with DIM SOCIALISTS.</p>
<p>He ain&#8217;t a man to ride the river with.<br />
And he has established he is going in a direction I refuse.</p>
<p>You have blasted my character and my ability to assess the nature of a person&#8217;s character &#8211; but you have NOT shown evidence that I am wrong in this particular instance.</p>
<p>You are entitled to vote for him if you are comfortable with him. </p>
<p>You are on this earth to determine such things.</p>
<p>I welcome your choices. I encourage you to make them as strong choices as you can.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I value the judgements of such as Rush Limbaugh and David Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin, Joe Arpaio, my own father, my brother-in-law, my nephew who earned his Silver Spurs in Iraq, and a lot of other folks.<br />
Some of those will vote for McCain, because of the Party.<br />
But looking at their faces as they announce this CHANGE in their stance&#8230;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel like jumping off a cliff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ombre Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombre Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262552</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 8th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, dartagnans_blade said: 
You conservatives are as bad as the liberals………WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
Get off your idiotic high horse and support the “best” candidate otherwise shut up already.
Bunch of babies, to question McCains war history because you dislike his politics is as bad as the Beserkley Code Pinkos.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is NOT Elementary School, and you are not a child/student who is NOT allowed to question the credentials or expertise of a professor on a subject of which you are totally ignorant.

This is the greatest responsibility of a free nation, the citizens&#039; handling the dispensation of AUTHORITY to their leaders, RATHER THAN THE OTHER WAY AROUND, via the VOTE.

You are as accountable for where you assign this authority IN YOUR BEHALF AND BY YOUR OWN HAND as if it were the CO-SIGN on a MORTGAGE, or your name on a MARRIAGE LICENSE, or the keys to your car which has a huge mortgage lien on it, and whose insurance is nullified by the driving of it by the one you are handing the keys to - or any one of dozens of other scenarios - such as the safety of your home and all therein, including your family - ALL PUT TOGETHER - because the SAFETY AND SECURITY of your NATION, &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;that nest by which you and your family and posterity CAN THRIVE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; - is in your hands and YOU are the one who decides INTO WHOSE FIDUCIARY CARE YOU SHALL ENTRUST THAT SERIOUS RESPONSIBILITY TO, and the CONSEQUENCES that ALL IN THE NATION, and ALL WHOM THE NATION TOUCHES shall suffer in direct consequence TO YOUR VOTE.

It is impossible to tell you the gravity of the responsibility you have.

For you to suggest that McCain or any other candidate for the highest office in the world HAS A &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RIGHT &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TO KEEP A BLOODY THING from the VOTERS&lt;/strong&gt; is an insanity that is bereft of both REASON and the very ESSENSE of everything REQUIRED of a people to prove themselves DESERVING of the freedom to select their own leadership.

&lt;strong&gt;HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT A CANDIDATE HAS THE RIGHT TO BRAG ABOUT SOME PORTION OF HIS PERTINENT BACKGROUND AND YET SEAL THOSE RECORDS  FROM THE VOTERS AND STILL SUGGEST THAT IT IS OUTRAGEOUS OF US TO INQUIRE AS TO WHAT THAT MEANS AS TO HIS CHARACTER AND TRUSTWORTHINESS.&lt;/strong&gt;

Would you hire a building contracter to install the new Electric wiring and a new roof on your home WHEN HE REFUSES TO GIVE YOU ACCESS TO HIS WORK HISTORY AND PREVIOUS CLIENTS??? OR SHOW YOU HIS CREDENTIALS AND LICENSES AND PERMITS...

I wonder what your wife would do to YOU if you did THAT!

Well, This is a candidate for the highest office in the entire world - AND HE IS A PUBLIC SERVANT!

NOT A KING OR AN EMPEROR.

NOR is he merely some CHEAP ENTERTAINER whose movie you go see, then go home and forget all about it!

You are proposing that WE ALL PUT THE LIFE OF OUR FAMILIES AND OUR NATION IN THE HANDS OF THIS MAN. AND THE STYLE OF GOVERNMENT WE LIVE UNDER, AS WELL.

&lt;strong&gt;If you haven&#039;t got any more sense than to treat yourself and all voters differently than a child rebelliously and impertinently challenging his TEACHER in an elementary classroom....&lt;/strong&gt;

OR A CANDIDATE differently than this &lt;em&gt;REVERENTIAL ANOINTING&lt;/em&gt; as if you see the STAR OF BETHLEHEM over his head! AS A HOST OF ESTABLISHED PROPHETS WALK ON WATER TO COME AND PLACE CROWNS ON HIS HEAD THAT APPEAR IN THEIR HANDS from a mysterious Hand that just got through WRITING ON THE WALL, &quot;this is my beloved Covenant brother in whom I am well-pleased to commend all your lives, this day&quot;......... And when his enemies come forward to denounce him THEY DROP DEADER THAN A DOORNAIL ON THE VERY SPOT! WITH A THUMBPRINT OF GOD ON THEIR FOREHEADS!

&lt;strong&gt;YOU will answer for what this man you vote for DOES WITH THAT AUTHORITY THAT YOU PERSONALLY GAVE TO HIM.&lt;/strong&gt;

We have a right to know his character and any events in his life that reveal that to us ARE OURS to examine as we will, when he applies for a job as a PUBLIC SERVANT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 8th, 2008 at 6:33 pm, dartagnans_blade said:<br />
You conservatives are as bad as the liberals………WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.<br />
Get off your idiotic high horse and support the “best” candidate otherwise shut up already.<br />
Bunch of babies, to question McCains war history because you dislike his politics is as bad as the Beserkley Code Pinkos.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is NOT Elementary School, and you are not a child/student who is NOT allowed to question the credentials or expertise of a professor on a subject of which you are totally ignorant.</p>
<p>This is the greatest responsibility of a free nation, the citizens&#8217; handling the dispensation of AUTHORITY to their leaders, RATHER THAN THE OTHER WAY AROUND, via the VOTE.</p>
<p>You are as accountable for where you assign this authority IN YOUR BEHALF AND BY YOUR OWN HAND as if it were the CO-SIGN on a MORTGAGE, or your name on a MARRIAGE LICENSE, or the keys to your car which has a huge mortgage lien on it, and whose insurance is nullified by the driving of it by the one you are handing the keys to &#8211; or any one of dozens of other scenarios &#8211; such as the safety of your home and all therein, including your family &#8211; ALL PUT TOGETHER &#8211; because the SAFETY AND SECURITY of your NATION, <em><strong>that nest by which you and your family and posterity CAN THRIVE</strong></em> &#8211; is in your hands and YOU are the one who decides INTO WHOSE FIDUCIARY CARE YOU SHALL ENTRUST THAT SERIOUS RESPONSIBILITY TO, and the CONSEQUENCES that ALL IN THE NATION, and ALL WHOM THE NATION TOUCHES shall suffer in direct consequence TO YOUR VOTE.</p>
<p>It is impossible to tell you the gravity of the responsibility you have.</p>
<p>For you to suggest that McCain or any other candidate for the highest office in the world HAS A <em><strong>RIGHT </strong></em><strong>TO KEEP A BLOODY THING from the VOTERS</strong> is an insanity that is bereft of both REASON and the very ESSENSE of everything REQUIRED of a people to prove themselves DESERVING of the freedom to select their own leadership.</p>
<p><strong>HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT A CANDIDATE HAS THE RIGHT TO BRAG ABOUT SOME PORTION OF HIS PERTINENT BACKGROUND AND YET SEAL THOSE RECORDS  FROM THE VOTERS AND STILL SUGGEST THAT IT IS OUTRAGEOUS OF US TO INQUIRE AS TO WHAT THAT MEANS AS TO HIS CHARACTER AND TRUSTWORTHINESS.</strong></p>
<p>Would you hire a building contracter to install the new Electric wiring and a new roof on your home WHEN HE REFUSES TO GIVE YOU ACCESS TO HIS WORK HISTORY AND PREVIOUS CLIENTS??? OR SHOW YOU HIS CREDENTIALS AND LICENSES AND PERMITS&#8230;</p>
<p>I wonder what your wife would do to YOU if you did THAT!</p>
<p>Well, This is a candidate for the highest office in the entire world &#8211; AND HE IS A PUBLIC SERVANT!</p>
<p>NOT A KING OR AN EMPEROR.</p>
<p>NOR is he merely some CHEAP ENTERTAINER whose movie you go see, then go home and forget all about it!</p>
<p>You are proposing that WE ALL PUT THE LIFE OF OUR FAMILIES AND OUR NATION IN THE HANDS OF THIS MAN. AND THE STYLE OF GOVERNMENT WE LIVE UNDER, AS WELL.</p>
<p><strong>If you haven&#8217;t got any more sense than to treat yourself and all voters differently than a child rebelliously and impertinently challenging his TEACHER in an elementary classroom&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>OR A CANDIDATE differently than this <em>REVERENTIAL ANOINTING</em> as if you see the STAR OF BETHLEHEM over his head! AS A HOST OF ESTABLISHED PROPHETS WALK ON WATER TO COME AND PLACE CROWNS ON HIS HEAD THAT APPEAR IN THEIR HANDS from a mysterious Hand that just got through WRITING ON THE WALL, &#8220;this is my beloved Covenant brother in whom I am well-pleased to commend all your lives, this day&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; And when his enemies come forward to denounce him THEY DROP DEADER THAN A DOORNAIL ON THE VERY SPOT! WITH A THUMBPRINT OF GOD ON THEIR FOREHEADS!</p>
<p><strong>YOU will answer for what this man you vote for DOES WITH THAT AUTHORITY THAT YOU PERSONALLY GAVE TO HIM.</strong></p>
<p>We have a right to know his character and any events in his life that reveal that to us ARE OURS to examine as we will, when he applies for a job as a PUBLIC SERVANT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ombre Rose</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262544</link>
		<dc:creator>Ombre Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262544</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 7th, 2008 at 10:55 pm, RealImmigrantChick said: 
Ombre, thanks for the McCain update. Just like we needed to know about Kerry, re: his honesty, we need to know about McCain. In my case, the more I learn about the guy, the less I am likely to vote for him. 
As to Clinton, I can only immagine why Clinton’s brothers called him that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve come back up the post to tell about Clinton, first - as I just said a lot more about McCain than I intended to and it is a long post many won&#039;t want to finish reading.

&lt;strong&gt;Clinton was nicknamed Vacuum Cleaner Nose by HIS OWN BROTHER &lt;/strong&gt;who was &quot;appointed&quot; chief Presidential cocaine procurer, by Bill. They attended a lot of meetings together where strategizing for various Clinton projects was done, among other things.
Some unusual people were at some of those party-style meetings, including Oliver North in his Reagan Iran Contra days.

These folks all reported back &quot;IN THE DAY&quot; that ROGER&#039;S pet name for Clinton was Vacuum Cleaner Nose, because of his ability to take the PARTY BOWL of COCAINE (&lt;em&gt;like a salad or punch bowl full of the stuff if I remember right&lt;/em&gt;???), meant to entertain the entire party for the entire night, and whiff it up in &lt;strong&gt;minutes&lt;/strong&gt;, by himself alone.
Thus, &quot;Vacuum Cleaner&quot; - thus Vacuum Cleaner Nose&quot; - of his own brother - for whom he did spend time in jail for drug dealing. And kindly did NOT implicate Bill when he was on trial.

Re McCain&#039;s War Record...
Always recommend folks do their own research, even I - &lt;em&gt;perfect as I am&lt;/em&gt;, have made some major bloopers - but many sites don&#039;t welcome links, and I forget which do and don&#039;t, so I don&#039;t post as many as I used to. 

I found articles by Kerry praising McCain, and by the daughter of the Keating from Keating Five trying to exonerate him and excoriate his attackers, and sites by Ted Sampley, Swift Boat Vets.

I didn&#039;t find sites by fellow POWS seeking to exonerate McCain. 
Or by former superior officers who remembered details of his record that passed through their hands, seeking to say, they couldn&#039;t reveal facts they knew for a fact from his sealed documents but THEY KNOW that McCain is all he says he is, etc. et al....

But I think you will be shocked and stunned more by who is &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt; defending McCain&#039;s war record than by who &lt;strong&gt;IS&lt;/strong&gt;.
Also why does he resembles Kerry in proudly proclaiming his &quot;war hero status&quot; while simultaneously SEALING HIS OWN WAR RECORDS.

Even the extremely bashful Alvin C. York of WW1 did not do that.
But these two vain men with SEALED RECORDS proclaiming their heroism to the world... so barfing.

But I am not going to vote for him - I&#039;ve had some painful lessons in my life about &quot;vouchsafing&quot; other people - and I am NOT ABOUT to hand AUTHORITY to a man when I feel SURE he will abuse it to do things I cannot tolerate. Socialistic things that hurt other people.
 I do have to stand before God and answer to why I &quot;feared man&quot; more than I trusted to GOD HIMSELF for the safety of this nation.

About three weeks ago as I wrassled with my own proud spirit - yes, I frequently do that! - a friend sent a chain e-mail about The Center of the Bible.
Turns out it &quot;JUST SO HAPPENS&quot; to be Psalms 118.
To cut a beautiful presentation off at the knees, they go on to say that Psalms 117 is the shortest chapter in the Bible, and that Psalms 119 is the longest chapter in the Bible, and that Psalms 118 is the center chapter. 
That there are 594 chapters BEFORE Psalms 118, and also there are 594 chapters AFTER Psalms 118 - and that 594+594=1188 - and that the Center VERSE in the Bible is Psalms 118:8.
[I do not know if Psalms 118:8 is the Center VERSE by virtue of being the CENTER VERSE of PSALM 118 - or if it is also by chance the literal Center VERSE of the entire Bible, too.]

But it is the Center verse of the center CHAPTER - and &quot;strangely&quot; it says, Lean on and trust in God more than on men. (Rose&#039;s paraphrase - loosely)

This e-mail came to me a few weeks after I discovered the only settled and peaceful GUT FEELING in my inward parts was to NOT VOTE FOR A MAN I HAD NO RESPECT FOR, just because &quot;THE WORLD&quot; said I had no &quot;CHOICE&quot; - there is always a choice. 

And I have in the past trusted a lot of people who were not ideologically perfectly mirrored to my own beliefs. Justifiably so!

And even if it is whether or not to renounce God and then if you refuse to, you then have to walk into the Colliseum where the lions wait to shred you - you can always make a choice which fills your guts with PEACE that the world cannot understand. 

Voting for John McCain is NOT one of those choices, for me.

However, NOT VOTING for John McCain - regardless of the consequences, even if it means a DIM PRESIDENT, is one of those choices that I amazingly have perfect peace in my inwards guts, about.

And I want those reading this to know, I have a great deal about Obama and about Hillary that I object to, CHARACTER-WISE, on the basis of our CONSTITUTION. AND on their SOCIALISM.

However, I genuinely feel McCain is fully CAPABLE and DESIRING TO take us further into Socialism than these two and the entire DIM PARTY could EVER take us.
And I say that with an incredible amount of information about Clintonism that I fully believe, as the story about Bill being called Vacuum Cleaner Nose should reflect. 
I do indeed feel they both should have been tried literally for TREASON and convicted and given the full penalty RATHER THAN BEING SET UP FOR MORE HIGHER OFFICES.
Of that I do assure you.

I just so do hold McCain in even FAR LOWER ESTEEM than all of that. SINCERELY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 7th, 2008 at 10:55 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:<br />
Ombre, thanks for the McCain update. Just like we needed to know about Kerry, re: his honesty, we need to know about McCain. In my case, the more I learn about the guy, the less I am likely to vote for him.<br />
As to Clinton, I can only immagine why Clinton’s brothers called him that.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve come back up the post to tell about Clinton, first &#8211; as I just said a lot more about McCain than I intended to and it is a long post many won&#8217;t want to finish reading.</p>
<p><strong>Clinton was nicknamed Vacuum Cleaner Nose by HIS OWN BROTHER </strong>who was &#8220;appointed&#8221; chief Presidential cocaine procurer, by Bill. They attended a lot of meetings together where strategizing for various Clinton projects was done, among other things.<br />
Some unusual people were at some of those party-style meetings, including Oliver North in his Reagan Iran Contra days.</p>
<p>These folks all reported back &#8220;IN THE DAY&#8221; that ROGER&#8217;S pet name for Clinton was Vacuum Cleaner Nose, because of his ability to take the PARTY BOWL of COCAINE (<em>like a salad or punch bowl full of the stuff if I remember right</em>???), meant to entertain the entire party for the entire night, and whiff it up in <strong>minutes</strong>, by himself alone.<br />
Thus, &#8220;Vacuum Cleaner&#8221; &#8211; thus Vacuum Cleaner Nose&#8221; &#8211; of his own brother &#8211; for whom he did spend time in jail for drug dealing. And kindly did NOT implicate Bill when he was on trial.</p>
<p>Re McCain&#8217;s War Record&#8230;<br />
Always recommend folks do their own research, even I &#8211; <em>perfect as I am</em>, have made some major bloopers &#8211; but many sites don&#8217;t welcome links, and I forget which do and don&#8217;t, so I don&#8217;t post as many as I used to. </p>
<p>I found articles by Kerry praising McCain, and by the daughter of the Keating from Keating Five trying to exonerate him and excoriate his attackers, and sites by Ted Sampley, Swift Boat Vets.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t find sites by fellow POWS seeking to exonerate McCain.<br />
Or by former superior officers who remembered details of his record that passed through their hands, seeking to say, they couldn&#8217;t reveal facts they knew for a fact from his sealed documents but THEY KNOW that McCain is all he says he is, etc. et al&#8230;.</p>
<p>But I think you will be shocked and stunned more by who is <strong>NOT</strong> defending McCain&#8217;s war record than by who <strong>IS</strong>.<br />
Also why does he resembles Kerry in proudly proclaiming his &#8220;war hero status&#8221; while simultaneously SEALING HIS OWN WAR RECORDS.</p>
<p>Even the extremely bashful Alvin C. York of WW1 did not do that.<br />
But these two vain men with SEALED RECORDS proclaiming their heroism to the world&#8230; so barfing.</p>
<p>But I am not going to vote for him &#8211; I&#8217;ve had some painful lessons in my life about &#8220;vouchsafing&#8221; other people &#8211; and I am NOT ABOUT to hand AUTHORITY to a man when I feel SURE he will abuse it to do things I cannot tolerate. Socialistic things that hurt other people.<br />
 I do have to stand before God and answer to why I &#8220;feared man&#8221; more than I trusted to GOD HIMSELF for the safety of this nation.</p>
<p>About three weeks ago as I wrassled with my own proud spirit &#8211; yes, I frequently do that! &#8211; a friend sent a chain e-mail about The Center of the Bible.<br />
Turns out it &#8220;JUST SO HAPPENS&#8221; to be Psalms 118.<br />
To cut a beautiful presentation off at the knees, they go on to say that Psalms 117 is the shortest chapter in the Bible, and that Psalms 119 is the longest chapter in the Bible, and that Psalms 118 is the center chapter.<br />
That there are 594 chapters BEFORE Psalms 118, and also there are 594 chapters AFTER Psalms 118 &#8211; and that 594+594=1188 &#8211; and that the Center VERSE in the Bible is Psalms 118:8.<br />
[I do not know if Psalms 118:8 is the Center VERSE by virtue of being the CENTER VERSE of PSALM 118 - or if it is also by chance the literal Center VERSE of the entire Bible, too.]</p>
<p>But it is the Center verse of the center CHAPTER &#8211; and &#8220;strangely&#8221; it says, Lean on and trust in God more than on men. (Rose&#8217;s paraphrase &#8211; loosely)</p>
<p>This e-mail came to me a few weeks after I discovered the only settled and peaceful GUT FEELING in my inward parts was to NOT VOTE FOR A MAN I HAD NO RESPECT FOR, just because &#8220;THE WORLD&#8221; said I had no &#8220;CHOICE&#8221; &#8211; there is always a choice. </p>
<p>And I have in the past trusted a lot of people who were not ideologically perfectly mirrored to my own beliefs. Justifiably so!</p>
<p>And even if it is whether or not to renounce God and then if you refuse to, you then have to walk into the Colliseum where the lions wait to shred you &#8211; you can always make a choice which fills your guts with PEACE that the world cannot understand. </p>
<p>Voting for John McCain is NOT one of those choices, for me.</p>
<p>However, NOT VOTING for John McCain &#8211; regardless of the consequences, even if it means a DIM PRESIDENT, is one of those choices that I amazingly have perfect peace in my inwards guts, about.</p>
<p>And I want those reading this to know, I have a great deal about Obama and about Hillary that I object to, CHARACTER-WISE, on the basis of our CONSTITUTION. AND on their SOCIALISM.</p>
<p>However, I genuinely feel McCain is fully CAPABLE and DESIRING TO take us further into Socialism than these two and the entire DIM PARTY could EVER take us.<br />
And I say that with an incredible amount of information about Clintonism that I fully believe, as the story about Bill being called Vacuum Cleaner Nose should reflect.<br />
I do indeed feel they both should have been tried literally for TREASON and convicted and given the full penalty RATHER THAN BEING SET UP FOR MORE HIGHER OFFICES.<br />
Of that I do assure you.</p>
<p>I just so do hold McCain in even FAR LOWER ESTEEM than all of that. SINCERELY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHoward</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262439</link>
		<dc:creator>SHoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262439</guid>
		<description>According to post #84 by dartagnans_blade, I am not supposed to criticize or question McCain unless I support him. I guess if he is not my first choice I must &quot;shut up already.&quot;

So, if no one is supposed to question his past, what are we allowed to question? 

- &lt;em&gt;just one of the &#039;babies&#039;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to post #84 by dartagnans_blade, I am not supposed to criticize or question McCain unless I support him. I guess if he is not my first choice I must &#8220;shut up already.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, if no one is supposed to question his past, what are we allowed to question? </p>
<p>- <em>just one of the &#8216;babies&#8217;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dartagnans_blade</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262434</link>
		<dc:creator>dartagnans_blade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262434</guid>
		<description>You conservatives are as bad as the liberals.........WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. 
Get off your idiotic high horse and support the &quot;best&quot; candidate otherwise shut up already. 
Bunch of babies, to question McCains war history because you dislike his politics is as bad as the Beserkley Code Pinkos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You conservatives are as bad as the liberals&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.<br />
Get off your idiotic high horse and support the &#8220;best&#8221; candidate otherwise shut up already.<br />
Bunch of babies, to question McCains war history because you dislike his politics is as bad as the Beserkley Code Pinkos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliesa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262394</link>
		<dc:creator>juliesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262394</guid>
		<description>#77, irish rose, thanks. I&#039;ve read this website for years, and I have Michelle&#039;s wonderful book &quot;Unhinged&quot;, and frankly I&#039;m disturbed by the fact that some of these threads are coming unhinged. It&#039;s to the point that people are spreading half-truths, whether knowingly or not. It does hurt the site, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#77, irish rose, thanks. I&#8217;ve read this website for years, and I have Michelle&#8217;s wonderful book &#8220;Unhinged&#8221;, and frankly I&#8217;m disturbed by the fact that some of these threads are coming unhinged. It&#8217;s to the point that people are spreading half-truths, whether knowingly or not. It does hurt the site, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliesa</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262392</link>
		<dc:creator>juliesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262392</guid>
		<description>#70 ombre rose

Almost everything in your comment was incorrect. As the tired old saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.

If you don&#039;t like McCain, that&#039;s ok, but it&#039;s not ok to spread falsehoods about him. You should do some reading before showing off your ignorance. I wasn&#039;t going to say anything, but I see that some of the other commenters are gullible enough to buy what you&#039;re peddling. You can start by reading McCain&#039;s memoir, then read Bud Day&#039;s book (copies of which are hard to find). You do know who Bud Day is, don&#039;t you?

If you&#039;re an example of a &quot;true conservative&quot;, then I don&#039;t want any part of it. Some of these comments are exactly what I see all the time on HuffPo, full of half-truths and uninformed hatred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#70 ombre rose</p>
<p>Almost everything in your comment was incorrect. As the tired old saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like McCain, that&#8217;s ok, but it&#8217;s not ok to spread falsehoods about him. You should do some reading before showing off your ignorance. I wasn&#8217;t going to say anything, but I see that some of the other commenters are gullible enough to buy what you&#8217;re peddling. You can start by reading McCain&#8217;s memoir, then read Bud Day&#8217;s book (copies of which are hard to find). You do know who Bud Day is, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re an example of a &#8220;true conservative&#8221;, then I don&#8217;t want any part of it. Some of these comments are exactly what I see all the time on HuffPo, full of half-truths and uninformed hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Russ</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262367</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262367</guid>
		<description>If this is an example of raging temper tantrum I&#039;ve had some construction foreman and demanding bosses get angrier and more red faced than that. This reporter hasn&#039;t had anybody fire back at question that was asked? This must be her first rodeo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is an example of raging temper tantrum I&#8217;ve had some construction foreman and demanding bosses get angrier and more red faced than that. This reporter hasn&#8217;t had anybody fire back at question that was asked? This must be her first rodeo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twoninerkilo</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-262357</link>
		<dc:creator>twoninerkilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/07/touchy-touchy-mccain-doesnt-like-questions-about-his-2004-kerryvp-chit-chat/#comment-262357</guid>
		<description>Irish Rose; What in hell have you been drinking? Irish coffee! No real conservative is going to help put that open borders,conservative hating $on Of @ b!tch in office, if their lives depended on it. They know it will be easier to fight socialism when a Dhim introduces a proposal then it would if McCrazy does it. You RINOs will just be lead around by the nose by him; as you&#039;ve aptly proven in your last post. I&#039;ve never wished ill on anyone, and never shoot any body that wasn&#039;t shooting at me, but I&#039;ve got to say that the only thing we can hope for now, is that three campaign planes will have a horrific crash while landing at the next La Rasa convention. #44: No I don&#039;t have any respect for the lunatic, as far as I&#039;m concerned he sat on his @$$ in Hanoi, while most of us were actually fighting the NVA. We sent all our heros home in body bags, he sure as hell don&#039;t qualify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irish Rose; What in hell have you been drinking? Irish coffee! No real conservative is going to help put that open borders,conservative hating $on Of @ b!tch in office, if their lives depended on it. They know it will be easier to fight socialism when a Dhim introduces a proposal then it would if McCrazy does it. You RINOs will just be lead around by the nose by him; as you&#8217;ve aptly proven in your last post. I&#8217;ve never wished ill on anyone, and never shoot any body that wasn&#8217;t shooting at me, but I&#8217;ve got to say that the only thing we can hope for now, is that three campaign planes will have a horrific crash while landing at the next La Rasa convention. #44: No I don&#8217;t have any respect for the lunatic, as far as I&#8217;m concerned he sat on his @$$ in Hanoi, while most of us were actually fighting the NVA. We sent all our heros home in body bags, he sure as hell don&#8217;t qualify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
