Comments on: Why I talked to the Baltimore Sun and not the New Yorker http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:01:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Michelle Malkin » New Yorker: Conservatism has fallen; can’t get up http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-325930 Michelle Malkin » New Yorker: Conservatism has fallen; can’t get up Mon, 19 May 2008 12:21:16 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-325930 [...] with the New Yorker and their anthropological style of studying conservatives are detailed here.} Posted in: GOP, Media Bias Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...] [...] with the New Yorker and their anthropological style of studying conservatives are detailed here.} Posted in: GOP, Media Bias Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...]

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » Newsflash: Liberal blogger gets a “scoop!”– by ripping off e-mails printed on this blog http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-296561 Michelle Malkin » Newsflash: Liberal blogger gets a “scoop!”– by ripping off e-mails printed on this blog Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:18:08 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-296561 [...] Oh, wait a minute. I’ve got it! They’re the same e-mails I published on this blog more than a month ago. [...] [...] Oh, wait a minute. I’ve got it! They’re the same e-mails I published on this blog more than a month ago. [...]

]]> By: JHSII http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-288935 JHSII Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:24:50 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-288935 I guess that to scooter anything that isn't a standard-issue liberal hit piece is just another puff piece... :roll: I guess that to scooter anything that isn’t a standard-issue liberal hit piece is just another puff piece…

:roll:

]]> By: Michelle Malkin » The thanks you get for helping out left-wing journalists http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-288590 Michelle Malkin » The thanks you get for helping out left-wing journalists Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:14:27 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-288590 [...] me of my little interlude with The New Yorker. Posted in: Barack Obama Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...] [...] me of my little interlude with The New Yorker. Posted in: Barack Obama Send to a Friend Printer Friendly comments [...]

]]> By: scooter56 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-276868 scooter56 Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:26:26 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-276868 puff piece......... puff piece………

]]> By: shooter http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-264263 shooter Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:24:30 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-264263 <blockquote>commenters in asking why they emphasized the “secrecy” surrounding your location.</blockquote> some here have asked about this... I see it as "the left are so venomous and crazed that Michelle and family had to move and keep it secret". It's a hit on the liberal left more than anything. When a size 0 (with donuts) has to keep secret her own home location solely BECAUSE of the LEFTIES??? Well that says a lot about liberals, their hatred and what they're capable of doing. Deranged and dangerous comes to mind. I'm glad he wrote the secrecy needed, it tells a part of her struggles, yet she does overcome. Congrats MM and Jesse and the little ones! And thx to Jon!

commenters in asking why they emphasized the “secrecy” surrounding your location.

some here have asked about this…
I see it as “the left are so venomous and crazed that Michelle and family had to move and keep it secret”.
It’s a hit on the liberal left more than anything. When a size 0 (with donuts) has to keep secret her own home location solely BECAUSE of the LEFTIES??? Well that says a lot about liberals, their hatred and what they’re capable of doing. Deranged and dangerous comes to mind.
I’m glad he wrote the secrecy needed, it tells a part of her struggles, yet she does overcome.
Congrats MM and Jesse and the little ones!
And thx to Jon!

]]> By: David Segal http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-264049 David Segal Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:30:34 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-264049 Oh boy! You sure told them!!!! Oh boy! You sure told them!!!!

]]> By: emjem24 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263357 emjem24 Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:13:38 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263357 Michelle: I loved this article. It really brought to mind what I've gone through as a woman and a conservative from my college days to my 30's. I too, used to embrace liberal "ideals" until I witnessed the antics that certain left-minded groups went through to promote their "dogma." I wanted no part of that. One question: how do you juggle it all? I know that "working from home" gives you a lot of flexibility but with two kids it can't be easy either. I look at your experience and know that it is possible (my mother did it). I applaud your decision to give the Baltimore Sun this interview. Personally, I despise the New Yorker, having been forced to subscribe to it for a semester for an undergraduate course required for my writing minor. While it has some great cartoons and essays, its viewpoint is of the left persuasion. I do not buy the argument of the Liberal Oasis blogger either. Since when did liberals asked questions before launching their ad-hominem attacks? At least you ask the questions that others refuse to. Thank you for choosing the difficult path while others in the media business would rather go for the "soft" approach. Michelle:

I loved this article. It really brought to mind what I’ve gone through as a woman and a conservative from my college days to my 30′s. I too, used to embrace liberal “ideals” until I witnessed the antics that certain left-minded groups went through to promote their “dogma.” I wanted no part of that.

One question: how do you juggle it all? I know that “working from home” gives you a lot of flexibility but with two kids it can’t be easy either. I look at your experience and know that it is possible (my mother did it).

I applaud your decision to give the Baltimore Sun this interview. Personally, I despise the New Yorker, having been forced to subscribe to it for a semester for an undergraduate course required for my writing minor. While it has some great cartoons and essays, its viewpoint is of the left persuasion.

I do not buy the argument of the Liberal Oasis blogger either. Since when did liberals asked questions before launching their ad-hominem attacks? At least you ask the questions that others refuse to. Thank you for choosing the difficult path while others in the media business would rather go for the “soft” approach.

]]> By: Barry F. http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263248 Barry F. Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:46:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263248 miss<strike>ing</strike> missing

]]> By: Barry F. http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263240 Barry F. Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:39:04 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263240 <blockquote>On March 10th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Outlander said: Anyway, when are you going to be back on Fox in prime time? I can never catch you during the day shifts you now seem to cover. Any way you can get on H&C???</blockquote> <strong>Ditto!</strong> I missing getting to hear your commentary, Michelle. I can't catch it during the daytime hours. I like seeing you opposite someone like Kirsten Powers who isn't the typical screaming pundit that just tries to yell over you.

On March 10th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Outlander said:

Anyway, when are you going to be back on Fox in prime time? I can never catch you during the day shifts you now seem to cover. Any way you can get on H&C???

Ditto!

I missing getting to hear your commentary, Michelle. I can’t catch it during the daytime hours. I like seeing you opposite someone like Kirsten Powers who isn’t the typical screaming pundit that just tries to yell over you.

]]> By: Outlander http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263205 Outlander Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:03:27 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263205 The Baltimore Sun did a nice write-up on you, although I join some of your other commenters in asking why they emphasized the "secrecy" surrounding your location. I hope the reporter's characterization of your secrecy requirements is an exageration - I couldn't imagine having to hide in my own house. Anyway, when are you going to be back on Fox in prime time? I can never catch you during the day shifts you now seem to cover. Any way you can get on H&C??? The Baltimore Sun did a nice write-up on you, although I join some of your other commenters in asking why they emphasized the “secrecy” surrounding your location. I hope the reporter’s characterization of your secrecy requirements is an exageration – I couldn’t imagine having to hide in my own house.

Anyway, when are you going to be back on Fox in prime time? I can never catch you during the day shifts you now seem to cover. Any way you can get on H&C???

]]> By: Dimsdale http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263190 Dimsdale Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:40:15 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263190 <blockquote>Michelle Malkin may seem like any mild-mannered blogger in her Baltimore-area home, but she's reviled by liberals like almost no one else online</blockquote> That single statement alone is the reason that I first go to your page in the morning. EVERY morning. The comments you receive are so demonstrative of the mindset of liberals, and you put them on display for all to see. Beautiful!! My only criticism is that you are an Apple person! Oh well, nobody is perfect! ;-)

Michelle Malkin may seem like any mild-mannered blogger in her Baltimore-area home, but she’s reviled by liberals like almost no one else online

That single statement alone is the reason that I first go to your page in the morning. EVERY morning. The comments you receive are so demonstrative of the mindset of liberals, and you put them on display for all to see. Beautiful!!

My only criticism is that you are an Apple person! Oh well, nobody is perfect! ;-)

]]> By: Offhanded http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263157 Offhanded Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:15:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263157 ......so......has, The New Yorker, or one of it's agents , responded to your e-mail? ……so……has, The New Yorker, or one of it’s agents , responded to your e-mail?

]]> By: Villa Julie College Republican’s-Blog » Michelle Malkin in The Baltimore Sun http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263145 Villa Julie College Republican’s-Blog » Michelle Malkin in The Baltimore Sun Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:58:25 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263145 [...] track record on conservatives. This piece on MM is unusually unbiased for the Baltimore Sun as she notes herself. Here is an excerpt of the article: The shingle-style house straddles a hillside, its windows [...] [...] track record on conservatives. This piece on MM is unusually unbiased for the Baltimore Sun as she notes herself. Here is an excerpt of the article: The shingle-style house straddles a hillside, its windows [...]

]]> By: Larraby http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/comment-page-1/#comment-263070 Larraby Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:51:18 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/09/why-i-talked-to-the-baltimore-sun-and-not-the-new-yorker/#comment-263070 Not cooperating with the New Yorker was a wise idea. Back in the 1990s, the New Yorker did a hit piece on Israel's then Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. The left hates nothing more than an Israeli conservative. Yes, the New Yorker and others dislike American conservatives but nothing like the scorn that the left and everyone at the New Yorker has for an Israeli conservative like Netanyahu. Bibi was smart enough not to give the New Yorker an interviewer. The article that The New Yorker published called Bibi a liar and blamed him for not agreeing to everything the moderate Arafat asked for. Not satisfied with that, the New Yorker engaged in all sorts of psychobabble about Bibi and his father. Bibi's father, who then in his 80s, was portrayed as an apocalyptic fanatic. The conclusion of the New Yorker piece was that Bibi was a rightwing nutcase, an obstacle to peace and a Dr. Strangelove. I have no doubt that if the New Yorker did a piece on Michelle Malkin the magazine would do the same thing that it did to Bibi: Talk only to people who hated Bibi, sugarcoat Arafat and make conservatives look like Billy Sunday. Granted, the New Yorker had a special loathing for Bibi, but the magazine would do it to anybody who is not a McGovern liberal. Not cooperating with the New Yorker was a wise idea. Back in the 1990s, the New Yorker did a hit piece on Israel’s then Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. The left hates nothing more than an Israeli conservative. Yes, the New Yorker and others dislike American conservatives but nothing like the scorn that the left and everyone at the New Yorker has for an Israeli conservative like Netanyahu. Bibi was smart enough not to give the New Yorker an interviewer. The article that The New Yorker published called Bibi a liar and blamed him for not agreeing to everything the moderate Arafat asked for. Not satisfied with that, the New Yorker engaged in all sorts of psychobabble about Bibi and his father. Bibi’s father, who then in his 80s, was portrayed as an apocalyptic fanatic. The conclusion of the New Yorker piece was that Bibi was a rightwing nutcase, an obstacle to peace and a Dr. Strangelove. I have no doubt that if the New Yorker did a piece on Michelle Malkin the magazine would do the same thing that it did to Bibi: Talk only to people who hated Bibi, sugarcoat Arafat and make conservatives look like Billy Sunday. Granted, the New Yorker had a special loathing for Bibi, but the magazine would do it to anybody who is not a McGovern liberal.

]]>