<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The feminist quota-mongers screw with science education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:46:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Polar</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-283796</link>
		<dc:creator>Polar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-283796</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. If women now earn 57 percent of bachelors degrees and 59 percent of masters degrees, shouldn&#039;t these people be telling them to stay out of college, until it&#039;s back to 50-50? I guess the numbers game only works in one direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. If women now earn 57 percent of bachelors degrees and 59 percent of masters degrees, shouldn&#8217;t these people be telling them to stay out of college, until it&#8217;s back to 50-50? I guess the numbers game only works in one direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263795</link>
		<dc:creator>garyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263795</guid>
		<description>LGM I presume you are a male so why don&#039;t you do the honorable thing and resign your teaching post and give it to a woman and more preferable a  muslim minority women? After all don&#039;t you agree in fairness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGM I presume you are a male so why don&#8217;t you do the honorable thing and resign your teaching post and give it to a woman and more preferable a  muslim minority women? After all don&#8217;t you agree in fairness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight_Talk_Luigi</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263786</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight_Talk_Luigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263786</guid>
		<description>I already see this happening in graduate school. I had a professor two years ago in an ENGINEERING class who couldn&#039;t shut up about Bush and Cheney. 

If they go through with this, they will weaken our nation and put us on the path toward being another EU, which in turn is about to squashed out of existence by radical Islam. 

So, do we want to place ourselves on such a road, or are we going to just leave the politics and humanities nonsense OUT of the pure sciences! 

Feminists, let us do our job and stay 
OUT of my field!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already see this happening in graduate school. I had a professor two years ago in an ENGINEERING class who couldn&#8217;t shut up about Bush and Cheney. </p>
<p>If they go through with this, they will weaken our nation and put us on the path toward being another EU, which in turn is about to squashed out of existence by radical Islam. </p>
<p>So, do we want to place ourselves on such a road, or are we going to just leave the politics and humanities nonsense OUT of the pure sciences! </p>
<p>Feminists, let us do our job and stay<br />
OUT of my field!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263725</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263725</guid>
		<description>From my experience going to school in the 1930-40 era and university in the lathe 40-early 50 era and then teaching from 1954 through 1987, I do not think the school system was the problem with the so-called lack of women in the math-science fields.  Rather was it possibly the preceived roll that women belonged in the home,not the work force that seamed to be held by the public?

My mother had a master degree in mathematics.  Several of my highschool teachers of mathematics were women.  In university there were very few women in the engineering or geology classes, however there was no reason for that due to school-university policy.  Even in the mining engineering field women could take that subject though there was a real barrier to the woman graduate working in the mines due to superstition of a certain cultural group who often worked in the mines.

I found in my teaching years in the earthscience field that often the better student was a woman.  Certainly the college did not have any policy against women in the engineering-physical science field.

Thus I think it is the culture not the school systems that cause few women to take the Math-Physical Science-Engineering courses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience going to school in the 1930-40 era and university in the lathe 40-early 50 era and then teaching from 1954 through 1987, I do not think the school system was the problem with the so-called lack of women in the math-science fields.  Rather was it possibly the preceived roll that women belonged in the home,not the work force that seamed to be held by the public?</p>
<p>My mother had a master degree in mathematics.  Several of my highschool teachers of mathematics were women.  In university there were very few women in the engineering or geology classes, however there was no reason for that due to school-university policy.  Even in the mining engineering field women could take that subject though there was a real barrier to the woman graduate working in the mines due to superstition of a certain cultural group who often worked in the mines.</p>
<p>I found in my teaching years in the earthscience field that often the better student was a woman.  Certainly the college did not have any policy against women in the engineering-physical science field.</p>
<p>Thus I think it is the culture not the school systems that cause few women to take the Math-Physical Science-Engineering courses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob's Kid</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob's Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263693</guid>
		<description>Pay me more and I&#039;ll be glad to teach science.

...oh wait...I already do.

Scratch that idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay me more and I&#8217;ll be glad to teach science.</p>
<p>&#8230;oh wait&#8230;I already do.</p>
<p>Scratch that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263640</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263640</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;GaijinBob&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Apparently you haven’t met too many science geeks. Radiate self confidence they do not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The people who are too shy to give a convincing presentation do not get to the top.  Those superstars in academic science may not dress up, but they certainly believe in themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>GaijinBob</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Apparently you haven’t met too many science geeks. Radiate self confidence they do not.</p></blockquote>
<p>The people who are too shy to give a convincing presentation do not get to the top.  Those superstars in academic science may not dress up, but they certainly believe in themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaijinBob</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263616</link>
		<dc:creator>GaijinBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263616</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rusty&lt;/strong&gt; said:&lt;blockquote&gt;Tre, are you honestly arguing that women aren’t as well suited to be scientists as men are? Because that would be crazy talk.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Actually &lt;a href=&quot;http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/psocpubs/0090502x/v31n7/s14.pdf?expires=1205190547&amp;id=42865229&amp;titleid=1017&amp;accname=The+Boeing+Company&amp;checksum=60CE315F9AEA16B6CF6DD6D40CFE1A92&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yes&lt;/a&gt;, on average.  But it&#039;s all about averages, not absolutes.  Generally speaking, there are more men who have the natural aptitude that makes the hard and applied sciences enjoyably challenging than women.  There are some women that do, but most don&#039;t.  How will you force equal numbers of girls into the dork classes if they just don&#039;t have the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmYDgncMhXw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;knack&lt;/a&gt;?
Dumb down the classes so they are more comfortable?  Sure, go ahead.  Less competition for me in years to come when those classes start graduating idiot engineers who can&#039;t design a Popsicle stick bridge. :roll:


&lt;strong&gt;lgm&lt;/strong&gt; said:&lt;blockquote&gt;People being judged by their manner and self confidence in making presentations as much as for the technical content.&lt;/blockquote&gt;:lol:  Apparently you haven&#039;t met too many science geeks.  Radiate self confidence they do not. :roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rusty</strong> said:<br />
<blockquote>Tre, are you honestly arguing that women aren’t as well suited to be scientists as men are? Because that would be crazy talk.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually <a href="http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/psocpubs/0090502x/v31n7/s14.pdf?expires=1205190547&amp;id=42865229&amp;titleid=1017&amp;accname=The+Boeing+Company&amp;checksum=60CE315F9AEA16B6CF6DD6D40CFE1A92" rel="nofollow">yes</a>, on average.  But it&#8217;s all about averages, not absolutes.  Generally speaking, there are more men who have the natural aptitude that makes the hard and applied sciences enjoyably challenging than women.  There are some women that do, but most don&#8217;t.  How will you force equal numbers of girls into the dork classes if they just don&#8217;t have the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmYDgncMhXw" rel="nofollow">knack</a>?<br />
Dumb down the classes so they are more comfortable?  Sure, go ahead.  Less competition for me in years to come when those classes start graduating idiot engineers who can&#8217;t design a Popsicle stick bridge. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>lgm</strong> said:<br />
<blockquote>People being judged by their manner and self confidence in making presentations as much as for the technical content.</p></blockquote>
<p> <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' />   Apparently you haven&#8217;t met too many science geeks.  Radiate self confidence they do not. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263562</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263562</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just aptitude that differs, it&#039;s interest. I&#039;m sure there are many girls/women that are fairly good at math and science, but just aren&#039;t interested in the subjects.

Just like my son likes action movies and my daughter likes relationship movies. They just do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just aptitude that differs, it&#8217;s interest. I&#8217;m sure there are many girls/women that are fairly good at math and science, but just aren&#8217;t interested in the subjects.</p>
<p>Just like my son likes action movies and my daughter likes relationship movies. They just do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263537</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263537</guid>
		<description>Grrr.... Lady that is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrr&#8230;. Lady that is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263536</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263536</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Women now earn 57 percent of bachelors degrees and 59 percent of masters degrees&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Looks like men are getting the short end of the stick here... more women are getting degrees.

So, do we now need affirmitive action for men?

Lacy better be careful what she squaks about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Women now earn 57 percent of bachelors degrees and 59 percent of masters degrees</p></blockquote>
<p>Looks like men are getting the short end of the stick here&#8230; more women are getting degrees.</p>
<p>So, do we now need affirmitive action for men?</p>
<p>Lacy better be careful what she squaks about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263498</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263498</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RaisedRight&lt;/strong&gt; said (#39):

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you think that women are not as prevalent in math and science because of a gender bias? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes.  This often is subtle: girls getting the message that they can&#039;t do math, women seeing that it&#039;s hard to have kids and build a science career.  People being judged by their manner and self confidence in making presentations as much as for the technical content.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you find that one sex has more of a natural mathematical aptitude or inclination over the other?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RaisedRight</strong> said (#39):</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you think that women are not as prevalent in math and science because of a gender bias? </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.  This often is subtle: girls getting the message that they can&#8217;t do math, women seeing that it&#8217;s hard to have kids and build a science career.  People being judged by their manner and self confidence in making presentations as much as for the technical content.</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you find that one sex has more of a natural mathematical aptitude or inclination over the other?</p></blockquote>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Andy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263475</link>
		<dc:creator>NY Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263475</guid>
		<description>If we carried this to the logical end of the feminist&#039;s demands, wouldn&#039;t some women have to step aside and let more men have those advanced degrees?  Or is this one of those liberal plans where it only goes one way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we carried this to the logical end of the feminist&#8217;s demands, wouldn&#8217;t some women have to step aside and let more men have those advanced degrees?  Or is this one of those liberal plans where it only goes one way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunslingerpatriot</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263456</link>
		<dc:creator>gunslingerpatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263456</guid>
		<description>Raisedright.
Good point to the troll.  Most of my psych, sociology, and english classes have more women in them than men in my math and biology courses.

Sadly because of a major crisis of academic vocation in psych; I have reached the conclusion that psych is not a science (like chemistry, biology, math, and the like) but a pseudoscience-big on interpretation and severely lacking in hard rigourous scientific application.  Hense, another guy is leaving psych at the end of the semester and heading to the science of radiology and nuclear medicine.

GSP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raisedright.<br />
Good point to the troll.  Most of my psych, sociology, and english classes have more women in them than men in my math and biology courses.</p>
<p>Sadly because of a major crisis of academic vocation in psych; I have reached the conclusion that psych is not a science (like chemistry, biology, math, and the like) but a pseudoscience-big on interpretation and severely lacking in hard rigourous scientific application.  Hense, another guy is leaving psych at the end of the semester and heading to the science of radiology and nuclear medicine.</p>
<p>GSP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twoninerkilo</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263430</link>
		<dc:creator>twoninerkilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263430</guid>
		<description>Worst mistake we ever made was giving lunatics like that the right to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst mistake we ever made was giving lunatics like that the right to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ursa5000</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/comment-page-1/#comment-263421</link>
		<dc:creator>ursa5000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/the-feminist-quota-mongers-screw-with-science-education/#comment-263421</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t these folks have better things to do with there time? No, really this is just Orwellian insanity. Stupid, crazy, and foolish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t these folks have better things to do with there time? No, really this is just Orwellian insanity. Stupid, crazy, and foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
