See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #263738
   On March 10th, 2008 at 10:44 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   Can we assume you didn’t send them a tip?

2. #263740
   On March 10th, 2008 at 10:48 pm, teresafromtejas said:

   Michelle,

   I looked through the blog and it’s really silly. They’re just jealous because you have writing skills.

3. #263741
   On March 10th, 2008 at 10:48 pm, puhiawa said:

   Disgraceful grammar.

4. #263743
   On March 10th, 2008 at 10:50 pm, Gator70 said:

   I had a hard time getting past the first spelling mistake. Someone like this does not have the mental capacity to mentally spar with MM. Moving farther down the post I just love the war is destroying our boys souls. Boo freakin hoo. No it is not. PTSD is not an excuse for everything we do wrong. Some people are just born dumba**es, and remain that way, even people who serve. I’ve had horrible bouts of insomnia since 2005 but I don’t use it as an excuse. I push on, and do my job. I can’t stand wimps and the people that enable them.

5. #263744
   On March 10th, 2008 at 10:52 pm, LC said:

   Ah, nothing like a well-place personal insult to drive your point home. You’d think these people would understand by now that no one cares about their opinionated ramblings.

6. #263762
   On March 10th, 2008 at 11:18 pm, aunursa said:

   You know you’ve won when the other side introduces what passes for an argument with an ad hominem attack.

7. #263763
   On March 10th, 2008 at 11:21 pm, TXRose said:

   First..wonderful article on you, Michelle, the other day.
   Second….what is it with these people that think their
   four letter word, hate filled screeds are something that other people want to read? When you remove the
   four letter words and all of the obvious hate speak,
   you find that there is nothing of substance in the
   piece after all.
   Perhaps they are so unhappy that this is the only way
   they can try to make themselves feel better..by
   screeching at people that have so much going for them that they are not on the same level, much less
   the same planet as these morons.

8. #263767
   On March 10th, 2008 at 11:28 pm, Gothguy said:

   Twits.

   That is all.

9. #263775
   On March 10th, 2008 at 11:38 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Wear their attacks as badges of honor.

   They have nothing of substance to disseminate and they know it, hence the rambling personal insults and childish behavior. If they can get their 15 minutes of blog fame by getting your attention, they have succeeded in their own minds.

10. #263778
    On March 10th, 2008 at 11:40 pm, Speakup said:

    There’s also the simple fact that she’s a bitch.

    Meaning= Michelle Malkin is in every way smarter, better and more passionate than I am, the only option I have left is to defame, defame, defame.

    So I was shocked to see the manner in which she has contested the legitimacy of the infamous YouTube video that depicts a U.S. Marine throwing the puppy off of a cliff, that has been making waves all week. “Disturbing whether the dog is real or fake, dead or alive? Yes,” she writes on her blog. “A hanging offense? No.”

    Did I say Michelle is in every way, smarter, better and more passionate?
    Let’s add unpretentious unlike this bozo.

11. #263783
    On March 10th, 2008 at 11:51 pm, shooter said:

    It’s always tougher to be the best, always on top or near it….
    But you don’t deserve that crap, Michelle.
    We love ya!

12. #263793
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:04 am, winemkr said:

    Get used to this tripe. I had a conversation with a young fool today that swears the Bush propaganda machine is curtailing the rights of kieth Oberman (whatever the hell his name is) to speak freely, and that is proof that Hitler can’t hold a candle to what the Bush administration is doing to us today.

    I need a drink.

    winemkr out

13. #263797
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:09 am, atxcowgirl said:

    That whole blog is rantasian! Sounds like they need to get a life.

14. #263814
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:37 am, Spc Steve said:

    As someone who suffers from mild PTSD, I wonder how this moron makes the leap of logic from adult-onset PTSD to adult-onset animal abuse. In my experience, since my first time returning from Iraq, my tolerance for violence against animals, or anything else minding its own business, for that matter, has almost completely disappeared. Experiences vary, I know, but I wonder where this joker is getting his precedent from. Or if it’s just something he cooked up from his own addled brain.

15. #263816
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:37 am, fulldroolcup said:

    Disgrasian is trolling for tips.

    Reminds me of a tired joke about circumcising elephants: the pay is terrible, but the tips are big.

    Baddabing!

16. #263821
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:47 am, see-dubya said:

    Hey, that’s Disgrasian-American, buddy.

17. #263826
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:50 am, hadsil said:

    You know a person by the enemies he, in this case she, has.

    You go girl!

18. #263828
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:51 am, Snooper said:

    The poor thing really is that insignificant. Michelle as an uncanny way to disrupt what few brain cells the libtards have remaining. Keep up the GREAT work Michelle!

19. #263836
    On March 11th, 2008 at 1:19 am, gippergirl said:

    hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    that individual has some serious time on their hands…

    Am sooooo proud of our Miss Michelle right now…

20. #263841
    On March 11th, 2008 at 1:30 am, allrsn said:

    A perfect of the elite class of stupid.

21. #263842
    On March 11th, 2008 at 1:30 am, allrsn said:

    opps *example

22. #263858
    On March 11th, 2008 at 2:28 am, radio relay said:

    Hmmm… can’t think of anything to say after reading such a infantile attack.

    Well, how about:

    “I’m rubber and you’re glue. Your stupid insults bounce off me, and stick to you!”

    Of course, I doubt the “pea brains” will get it.

23. #263880
    On March 11th, 2008 at 3:42 am, pgtips said:

    I believe the author of that site is Asian. As an Asian I feel the author of that site truly deserves the title Disgrasian.

    Just read the other articles on that site. 0 content, and completely flawed logic. I like his/her take on China’s Defense Budget. The comparison to America’s budget is disingenuous since America doesn’t silence dissidents by locking them in prisons, America doesn’t censor the internet, America doesn’t ignore 900 million of its people living below the poverty line. But whatever right? Let’s point the mandatory accusatory finger at America. That’s the sign of being an enlightened liberal.

24. #263890
    On March 11th, 2008 at 5:06 am, Prime Director said:

    MM: The best way to hand this kind of idiot is to simply spray some OFF on your ankles.

    They hate how it tastes.

25. #263904
    On March 11th, 2008 at 5:34 am, bit_boy said:

    Main Entry: Dis·gras·ian
    Function: noun
    Etymology: unkowen

    1 : a usually progressive condition (as Alzheimer’s disease)
    marked by deteriorated cognitive functioning often with emotional apathy

    2 : madness, insanity <a fanaticism bordering on dementia>

    3 : a common form of dementia of unknown cause, usually beginning in late adolescence, characterized by memory lapses, confusion,emotional instability, and progressive loss of mental ability.

    4 : may be accompanied by hallucinations of small dogs

26. #263905
    On March 11th, 2008 at 5:35 am, graysonret said:

    Typical garbage attack. When they can’t discuss issues logically and rationally, they attack the person’s culture or ancestry. This way they feel they’ve “won” the discussion. You meet people like that everywhere. I have no time for them. I once had a neighbor/good friend who was a liberal and could argue his points and back them up with facts, very well. He loved to discuss issues and we used to get into some real good debates. The difference between Philip and other liberals was that he didn’t let emotion rule the day. He could argue, end it, and then head out with me for a beer somewhere. He’s gone now, but I miss his logic. He educated me in how to defend with conservatism…and how to play a good game of chess. A rare gem in a crowd of idiots.

27. #263937
    On March 11th, 2008 at 7:20 am, Thunderbird 1 said:

    That’s so coincidental: I was just re-reading the section of “Unhinged” yesterday wherein MM addresses the lovely term “f—tard,” and there it was front and center in this ad hominem attack post.

    The defense rests, your honor.

28. #263941
    On March 11th, 2008 at 7:32 am, zorro said:

    That was pathetic. I pity the fool.

29. #263960
    On March 11th, 2008 at 8:34 am, pecze said:

    I find it funny that he’s so one sided, i.e. not allowing people to comment on his site.

30. #263989
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:14 am, tre said:

    I remember once racer Jeff Gordon told this story:
    Before a race began, the drivers were introduced to the crowd. When he was introduced he heard a lot of cheers, but also a lot of boo’s. That bothered him. Then the late, great Dale Earnhardt told him, “Don’t worry if they boo you, you should worry only if they don’t say anything when your introduced.”

    Don’t worry about these idiots, Michelle. Like Jeff Gordon, they only hate you because you’re having an effect.

    By the way, I don’t like Jeff Gordon, either. I was/still am a Dale Earnhardt fan.

31. #263998
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:24 am, lgm said:

    Two points.

    1. That blog treated MM no worse than this one treats Hillary Clinton.

    2. Look at the rest of the blog. MM is in good company.

32. #264002
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:27 am, cpodug said:

    If you ain’t takin’ flak, you ain’t over the target – author unknown

    You’re dead on over the target.

33. #264005
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:30 am, docflash said:

    It’s amusing to me that the left leaners seem to always get the 4 letter words in to cover their lack of writing skills.Who or what that wrote that piece pointed out the misspellers on YouTube.I’m wondering if they know how to spell ProofRead.That junk is my daily convincer that Michelle has truly hit the big time.

34. #264007
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:34 am, Regulus said:

    Nothing written at that site told me anything meaningful about Michelle, but I learned more than I wanted to know about the blogger.

    I spent what, three minutes there? I want those three minutes back!

35. #264017
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:48 am, radio relay said:

    lgm, you’re such a breath of fresh air…. not!

    I’ll talk to you like the child you are…

    “I know you are, but what am I?” (stick out tongue and roll eyes)

36. #264019
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:51 am, Kowboy said:

    I noticed there was no comments section. I’m betting there was one, but after getting ripped a new one on a regular basis for being barely more sentient than a rock, the author removed it.

37. #264024
    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:59 am, JohnHolliday said:

    1. That blog treated MM no worse than this one treats Hillary Clinton.

    2. Look at the rest of the blog. MM is in good company.

    Yes, lgm, MM is in good company. The blog’s author is obviously a brain donor.

    However, your first point is wrong. We may not like Hillary Clinton but we don’t call her a f*tard or a bitch and we don’t denegrate her because of her race or gender.

    We leave the hate speech to those that have the longest history in this country of pro-slavery, pro-hate, and anti-civil rights; the Democrats.

38. #264037
    On March 11th, 2008 at 10:14 am, misterbee241 said:

    The thing that gets me about these liberals/progressives/socialists/anarchists
    /Marxists/communists or whatever they’re calling themselves these days, is they never attack a conservative’s position on any issue. The attack is always, always, personal – physical appearance, ethnicity, etc, any of which would get a conservative crucified for racism.
    These personal attacks are because they have no coherent argument on any conservative positions. I remember on a forum on our local paper one of these yahoos called Ann Coulter everything but a female human being. When I asked him where he specifically disagreed with Anns’ standing on certain issues, I never heard back from him or her, or which ever the case was.

39. #264039
    On March 11th, 2008 at 10:17 am, misterbee241 said:

    lgm – I’ve never seen Michelle disparage Hillary’s personal appearance. If she did would you be kind enough to point out to me?

40. #264055
    On March 11th, 2008 at 10:39 am, terrig said:

    LGM is a loser and he knows it. I also challenge the esteemed math prof, family man of perfect only kids, and all around pompous a$$ to provide evidence of Michelle ever trashing Hillary’s looks. Perhaps I have at some point but not Michelle (although I’m generally pretty quiet about looks as I’m no Cindy Crawford myself).
    However, that means nothing to lgm. He is a drive by puke who thinks he’s the cat’s meow.

41. #264056
    On March 11th, 2008 at 10:39 am, Blind_Mule said:

    I always expect incoherent rants of nothingness from these mental midgets. The only defense I’ve ever heard from them on any issue is Conservitives are stupid, it must take every one of their brain cell they are working with to come up with that one or these deep thoughts of Michelle.

42. #264058
    On March 11th, 2008 at 10:42 am, Blind_Mule said:

    terrig said:
    He is a drive by puke who thinks he’s the cat’s meow in heat, loud and annoying.

    There fixed it for ya.

43. #264099
    On March 11th, 2008 at 11:27 am, fourstringfuror said:

    By the way, I don’t like Jeff Gordon, either. I was/still am a Dale Earnhardt fan.

    I was about to open a can you, but you saved yourself.

44. #264101
    On March 11th, 2008 at 11:28 am, fourstringfuror said:

    On March 11th, 2008 at 9:24 am, lgm said:

    Did you guys hear something?

45. #264146
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:21 pm, lgm said:

    Bringing conservative commentary to new intellectual heights, radio relay (#35)

    “I know you are, but what am I?” (stick out tongue and roll eyes)

    The short term memory award goes to terrig (#40):

    provide evidence of Michelle ever trashing Hillary’s looks.

    MM posts often come with a picture. The pics of H. Clinton are not flattering. As for conservatives sticking to the issues, check here,
    or here.

46. #264159
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, dakine said:

    Pretty lame blog. Immature and amateurish really. Let’s keep it a little real though. Michelle uses very unflattering photos of those with whom she disagrees (here and on HotAir), and many of the comments on this board regarding Clinton, Pelosi and others involve personal appearance and are very nasty and childish. The photo of Michelle on that blog is very rough, but I’m sure Michelle was able to laugh a little at herself, as she strikes me as someone with a good sense of humor who doesn’t take herself too seriously.

47. #264170
    On March 11th, 2008 at 12:49 pm, melinda said:

    Here’s a word for them: uncouth

    adjective
    lacking refinement or cultivation or taste.

48. #264211
    On March 11th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, radio relay said:

    In your case of liberals such as yourself lgm, I must sink to your level…

    I’m assuming it’s all you understand…. but that might be a stretch.

49. #264441
    On March 11th, 2008 at 6:26 pm, fourstringfuror said:

    Two points:

    1) lgm is a troll. He gets a rise out of baiting people.

    2) Don’t. Feed. The. Troll.

50. #275546
    On March 29th, 2008 at 11:43 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Then there’s that thing where a person is forced to apologize for any kind of
    

    associasian

    : (”It’s my girlfriend’s dog” functions quite like “She’s not the same kind of Asian as me”). There’s also the simple fact that she’s a bitch. And that I think she belongs in a crate.

    There is another word for you: “associasian.” A regular genius this one. He/she reminds me of the Batman nemesis Egghead, who put the word “egg” into words in a similar way. Fine for a comic character, but a bit childish (to be kind to the mentally infirm) in a presumed adult.

    Ever the queen of non sequitur, she proceeds to qualify a theory that the video was faked with the intent to reinforce… soldier hate?

    You’ll find that many academes refer to YouTube comments for citeable research. They’re so factually accurate that we don’t even allow them on DISGRASIAN. But that’s besides the point.

    Really? Must be one of the soft (not real) sciences if so. I have no idea what he/she means by the sentence that follows.

    This is just another site that exemplifies liberal tolerance.

51. #275568
    On March 30th, 2008 at 1:56 am, Radiopatriot said:

    If Disgrasian was trying to get some attention, they succeeded mightily. Their sitemeter was probably spinning. But guess how many will be back for a second helping of what’s obviously a relief valve for someone who’s trying to deal with being Asian? Less than 10%. Lot of self loathing and insecurity there.

    Michelle, you’re smart and tough. You know how to handle it.

    Andrea Shea King