Comments on: Word of the day http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:13:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Radiopatriot http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-275568 Radiopatriot Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:56:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-275568 If Disgrasian was trying to get some attention, they succeeded mightily. Their sitemeter was probably spinning. But guess how many will be back for a second helping of what's obviously a relief valve for someone who's trying to deal with being Asian? Less than 10%. Lot of self loathing and insecurity there. Michelle, you're smart and tough. You know how to handle it. Andrea Shea King If Disgrasian was trying to get some attention, they succeeded mightily. Their sitemeter was probably spinning. But guess how many will be back for a second helping of what’s obviously a relief valve for someone who’s trying to deal with being Asian? Less than 10%. Lot of self loathing and insecurity there.

Michelle, you’re smart and tough. You know how to handle it.

Andrea Shea King

]]> By: Dimsdale http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-275546 Dimsdale Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:43:54 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-275546 <blockquote>Then there's that thing where a person is forced to apologize for any kind of <blockquote>associasian</blockquote>: ("It's my girlfriend's dog" functions quite like "She's not the same kind of Asian as me"). There's also the simple fact that she's a bitch. And that I think she belongs in a crate.</blockquote> There is another word for you: "associasian." A regular genius this one. He/she reminds me of the Batman nemesis Egghead, who put the word "egg" into words in a similar way. Fine for a comic character, but a bit childish (to be kind to the mentally infirm) in a presumed adult. Ever the queen of non sequitur, she proceeds to qualify a theory that the video was faked with the intent to reinforce... soldier hate? <blockquote>You'll find that many academes refer to YouTube comments for citeable research. They're so factually accurate that we don't even allow them on DISGRASIAN. But that's besides the point.</blockquote> Really? Must be one of the soft (not real) sciences if so. I have no idea what he/she means by the sentence that follows. This is just another site that exemplifies liberal tolerance.

Then there’s that thing where a person is forced to apologize for any kind of

associasian

: (“It’s my girlfriend’s dog” functions quite like “She’s not the same kind of Asian as me”). There’s also the simple fact that she’s a bitch. And that I think she belongs in a crate.

There is another word for you: “associasian.” A regular genius this one. He/she reminds me of the Batman nemesis Egghead, who put the word “egg” into words in a similar way. Fine for a comic character, but a bit childish (to be kind to the mentally infirm) in a presumed adult.

Ever the queen of non sequitur, she proceeds to qualify a theory that the video was faked with the intent to reinforce… soldier hate?

You’ll find that many academes refer to YouTube comments for citeable research. They’re so factually accurate that we don’t even allow them on DISGRASIAN. But that’s besides the point.

Really? Must be one of the soft (not real) sciences if so. I have no idea what he/she means by the sentence that follows.

This is just another site that exemplifies liberal tolerance.

]]> By: fourstringfuror http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264441 fourstringfuror Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:52 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264441 Two points: 1) lgm is a troll. He gets a rise out of baiting people. 2) Don't. Feed. The. Troll. Two points:

1) lgm is a troll. He gets a rise out of baiting people.

2) Don’t. Feed. The. Troll.

]]> By: radio relay http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264211 radio relay Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:29:19 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264211 In your case of liberals such as yourself lgm, I must sink to your level... I'm assuming it's all you understand.... but that might be a stretch. In your case of liberals such as yourself lgm, I must sink to your level…

I’m assuming it’s all you understand…. but that might be a stretch.

]]> By: melinda http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264170 melinda Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:49:23 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264170 Here's a word for <em><em>them</em></em>: <em><strong>uncouth</strong></em> <em>adjective </em> lacking refinement or cultivation or taste. Here’s a word for them: uncouth

adjective
lacking refinement or cultivation or taste.

]]> By: dakine http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264159 dakine Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:30:25 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264159 Pretty lame blog. Immature and amateurish really. Let's keep it a little real though. Michelle uses very unflattering photos of those with whom she disagrees (here and on HotAir), and many of the comments on this board regarding Clinton, Pelosi and others involve personal appearance and are very nasty and childish. The photo of Michelle on that blog is very rough, but I'm sure Michelle was able to laugh a little at herself, as she strikes me as someone with a good sense of humor who doesn't take herself too seriously. Pretty lame blog. Immature and amateurish really. Let’s keep it a little real though. Michelle uses very unflattering photos of those with whom she disagrees (here and on HotAir), and many of the comments on this board regarding Clinton, Pelosi and others involve personal appearance and are very nasty and childish. The photo of Michelle on that blog is very rough, but I’m sure Michelle was able to laugh a little at herself, as she strikes me as someone with a good sense of humor who doesn’t take herself too seriously.

]]> By: lgm http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264146 lgm Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:21:40 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264146 Bringing conservative commentary to new intellectual heights, <strong>radio relay</strong> (#35) <blockquote>“I know you are, but what am I?” (stick out tongue and roll eyes)</blockquote> The short term memory award goes to <strong>terrig</strong> (#40): <blockquote>provide evidence of Michelle ever trashing Hillary’s looks.</blockquote> MM posts often come with a <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/17/operation-rescue-hillary/" rel="nofollow">picture</a>. The pics of H. Clinton are not flattering. As for conservatives sticking to the issues, check <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/allrightgear" rel="nofollow">here</a>, or <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/hillaryscaresme/984373" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Bringing conservative commentary to new intellectual heights, radio relay (#35)

“I know you are, but what am I?” (stick out tongue and roll eyes)

The short term memory award goes to terrig (#40):

provide evidence of Michelle ever trashing Hillary’s looks.

MM posts often come with a picture. The pics of H. Clinton are not flattering. As for conservatives sticking to the issues, check here,
or here.

]]> By: fourstringfuror http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264101 fourstringfuror Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:28:21 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264101 <blockquote>On March 11th, 2008 at 9:24 am, lgm said: </blockquote> Did you guys hear something?

On March 11th, 2008 at 9:24 am, lgm said:

Did you guys hear something?

]]> By: fourstringfuror http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264099 fourstringfuror Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:27:23 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264099 <blockquote>By the way, I don’t like Jeff Gordon, either. I was/still am a Dale Earnhardt fan.</blockquote> I was about to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_D._Mercer" rel="nofollow">open a can</a> you, but you saved yourself. :)

By the way, I don’t like Jeff Gordon, either. I was/still am a Dale Earnhardt fan.

I was about to open a can you, but you saved yourself. :)

]]> By: Blind_Mule http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264058 Blind_Mule Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:42:29 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264058 <blockquote>terrig said: He is a drive by puke who thinks he’s the cat’s meow in heat, loud and annoying.</blockquote> There fixed it for ya. :lol:

terrig said:
He is a drive by puke who thinks he’s the cat’s meow in heat, loud and annoying.

There fixed it for ya. :lol:

]]> By: Blind_Mule http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264056 Blind_Mule Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:39:45 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264056 I always expect incoherent rants of nothingness from these mental midgets. The only defense I've ever heard from them on any issue is Conservitives are stupid, it must take every <strong>one</strong> of their brain <strong>cell</strong> they are working with to come up with that one or these deep thoughts of Michelle. I always expect incoherent rants of nothingness from these mental midgets. The only defense I’ve ever heard from them on any issue is Conservitives are stupid, it must take every one of their brain cell they are working with to come up with that one or these deep thoughts of Michelle.

]]> By: terrig http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264055 terrig Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:39:37 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264055 LGM is a loser and he knows it. I also challenge the esteemed math prof, family man of perfect only kids, and all around pompous a$$ to provide evidence of Michelle ever trashing Hillary's looks. Perhaps I have at some point but not Michelle (although I'm generally pretty quiet about looks as I'm no Cindy Crawford myself). However, that means nothing to lgm. He is a drive by puke who thinks he's the cat's meow. LGM is a loser and he knows it. I also challenge the esteemed math prof, family man of perfect only kids, and all around pompous a$$ to provide evidence of Michelle ever trashing Hillary’s looks. Perhaps I have at some point but not Michelle (although I’m generally pretty quiet about looks as I’m no Cindy Crawford myself).
However, that means nothing to lgm. He is a drive by puke who thinks he’s the cat’s meow.

]]> By: misterbee241 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264039 misterbee241 Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:17:24 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264039 lgm - I've never seen <strong>Michelle </strong>disparage Hillary's personal appearance. If she did would you be kind enough to point out to me? lgm – I’ve never seen Michelle disparage Hillary’s personal appearance. If she did would you be kind enough to point out to me?

]]> By: misterbee241 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264037 misterbee241 Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:14:44 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264037 The thing that gets me about these liberals/progressives/socialists/anarchists /Marxists/communists or whatever they're calling themselves these days, is they never attack a conservative's position on any issue. The attack is always, always, personal - physical appearance, ethnicity, etc, any of which would get a conservative crucified for racism. These personal attacks are because they have no coherent argument on any conservative positions. I remember on a forum on our local paper one of these yahoos called Ann Coulter everything but a female human being. When I asked him where he specifically disagreed with Anns' standing on certain issues, I never heard back from him or her, or which ever the case was. The thing that gets me about these liberals/progressives/socialists/anarchists
/Marxists/communists or whatever they’re calling themselves these days, is they never attack a conservative’s position on any issue. The attack is always, always, personal – physical appearance, ethnicity, etc, any of which would get a conservative crucified for racism.
These personal attacks are because they have no coherent argument on any conservative positions. I remember on a forum on our local paper one of these yahoos called Ann Coulter everything but a female human being. When I asked him where he specifically disagreed with Anns’ standing on certain issues, I never heard back from him or her, or which ever the case was.

]]> By: JohnHolliday http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-264024 JohnHolliday Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:59:59 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/10/word-of-the-day/#comment-264024 <blockquote>1. That blog treated MM no worse than this one treats Hillary Clinton. 2. Look at the rest of the blog. MM is in good company.</blockquote> Yes, <strong>lgm</strong>, MM is in good company. The blog's author is obviously a brain donor. However, your first point is wrong. We may not like Hillary Clinton but we don't call her a f*tard or a bitch and we don't denegrate her because of her race or gender. We leave the hate speech to those that have the longest history in this country of pro-slavery, pro-hate, and anti-civil rights; the Democrats.

1. That blog treated MM no worse than this one treats Hillary Clinton.

2. Look at the rest of the blog. MM is in good company.

Yes, lgm, MM is in good company. The blog’s author is obviously a brain donor.

However, your first point is wrong. We may not like Hillary Clinton but we don’t call her a f*tard or a bitch and we don’t denegrate her because of her race or gender.

We leave the hate speech to those that have the longest history in this country of pro-slavery, pro-hate, and anti-civil rights; the Democrats.

]]>