Comments on: Now The New Republic wants to talk? http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:47:13 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: DaveC http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-266233 DaveC Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:30:57 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-266233 <blockquote>On March 12th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, leepro said: re: #5 skey said: Heh, I think the more conventional meaning of SOL works as well. [uh… dummy here] What is the “more conventional meaning of SOL”?</blockquote> 'Simply' Out of Luck

On March 12th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, leepro said:

re: #5 skey said:

Heh, I think the more conventional meaning of SOL works as well.

[uh… dummy here] What is the “more conventional meaning of SOL”?

‘Simply’ Out of Luck

]]> By: Entropy40 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-266068 Entropy40 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:56:33 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-266068 <blockquote>My name is Cara Parks and I work at The New Republic. Today we are running a lengthy story on the Clintons’ sleaziest donors. You </blockquote> DIMSDALE!!! You really need a spoiler on that. :) I just spewed Mt. Dew all over my monitor ... the keyboard ... the desk and some of it dribbled down my shirt. But you're right...such a pity that we won't ever see them write that. Can we say "Bias?" SURE we can! Thanks for the laugh. :)

My name is Cara Parks and I work at The New Republic. Today we are running a lengthy story on the Clintons’ sleaziest donors. You

DIMSDALE!!! You really need a spoiler on that. :) I just spewed Mt. Dew all over my monitor … the keyboard … the desk and some of it dribbled down my shirt.

But you’re right…such a pity that we won’t ever see them write that. Can we say “Bias?” SURE we can!

Thanks for the laugh. :)

]]> By: Dimsdale http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265373 Dimsdale Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:55:13 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265373 <blockquote>My name is Cara Parks and I work at The New Republic. Today we are running a lengthy story on the Clintons’ sleaziest donors. You can check out the piece here. Obama has Rezko; the Clintons have, well, a lot more people. Some of them you might have forgotten – Ng Lap Seng, the Macau hotel owner (”known as much for its prostitutes working the lobby as for its floor show of whip-wielding, leather-clad dancers upstairs”)? Peter Paul, who tried to swindle Fidel Castro in the ‘70s and used to be Fabio’s manager? IPA, an allegedly sexual-harassment-filled firm in Illinois – two ex-employees told their stories on Oprah — that’s given over $100,000 to Hillary’s campaigns since 2000? And unlike other politicians who’ve returned IPA’s donations, she has not. There’s a ton of fascinating stuff in there, and I think your readers will really enjoy it. Here’s the URL again: link Thanks, Cara Parks</blockquote> I believe that any of Michelle's readers would have been acquainted with the Clinton's sleazy and numerous donors long before she had an opponent that was both another liberal and one TNR supported. I would posit that TNR got their information <em>FROM </em>Michelle's site and not vice versa! Maybe TNR's readers might enjoy it and learn something that we have been telling them since the early 90's!

My name is Cara Parks and I work at The New Republic. Today we are running a lengthy story on the Clintons’ sleaziest donors. You can check out the piece here. Obama has Rezko; the Clintons have, well, a lot more people. Some of them you might have forgotten – Ng Lap Seng, the Macau hotel owner (”known as much for its prostitutes working the lobby as for its floor show of whip-wielding, leather-clad dancers upstairs”)? Peter Paul, who tried to swindle Fidel Castro in the ‘70s and used to be Fabio’s manager? IPA, an allegedly sexual-harassment-filled firm in Illinois – two ex-employees told their stories on Oprah — that’s given over $100,000 to Hillary’s campaigns since 2000? And unlike other politicians who’ve returned IPA’s donations, she has not.

There’s a ton of fascinating stuff in there, and I think your readers will really enjoy it. Here’s the URL again: link

Thanks,
Cara Parks

I believe that any of Michelle’s readers would have been acquainted with the Clinton’s sleazy and numerous donors long before she had an opponent that was both another liberal and one TNR supported.

I would posit that TNR got their information FROM Michelle’s site and not vice versa!

Maybe TNR’s readers might enjoy it and learn something that we have been telling them since the early 90’s!

]]> By: blogagog http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265345 blogagog Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:58:27 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265345 SOL does not mean what you think it means. SOL does not mean what you think it means.

]]> By: leepro http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265224 leepro Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:23:38 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265224 Re: #19 Michelle Oh yeah! [remembers now]. In that case, I agree with <strong>skey</strong>, although "snort out loud" does invoke a snort-out-loud kind of response! :mrgreen: Re: #19 Michelle

Oh yeah! [remembers now]. In that case, I agree with skey, although “snort out loud” does invoke a snort-out-loud kind of response!

:mrgreen:

]]> By: Boomer http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265216 Boomer Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:16:44 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265216 When on active duty one of my very young and naïve Airmen wanted to know which form was used when someone was SOL. We developed one for her and she finally bought the clue. :roll: When on active duty one of my very young and naïve Airmen wanted to know which form was used when someone was SOL. We developed one for her and she finally bought the clue. :roll:

]]> By: Michelle Malkin http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265212 Michelle Malkin Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:09:46 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265212 Google it. Google it.

]]> By: leepro http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265211 leepro Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:07:52 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265211 <blockquote>re: #5 skey said: Heh, I think the more conventional meaning of SOL works as well. </blockquote> [uh... dummy here] What <em>is</em> the "more conventional meaning of SOL"? :?

re: #5 skey said:

Heh, I think the more conventional meaning of SOL works as well.

[uh... dummy here] What is the “more conventional meaning of SOL”?

:?

]]> By: capitano http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265205 capitano Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:03:35 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265205 So TNR snubs you and then months later sends you email spam which you post on your website with active links to TNR articles. See? You <b>are</b> a much better woman than Foer. So TNR snubs you and then months later sends you email spam which you post on your website with active links to TNR articles.

See? You are a much better woman than Foer.

]]> By: leepro http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265202 leepro Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:02:24 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265202 <blockquote>re: #4 cpodug said: You should have put a warning label on this: “Do not read with mouth full. This could have serious consequences to your health.” </blockquote> Correction: This could have serious consequences to your <strong>screen and keyboard</strong>. 8O

re: #4 cpodug said:

You should have put a warning label on this: “Do not read with mouth full. This could have serious consequences to your health.”

Correction:
This could have serious consequences to your screen and keyboard.

8O

]]> By: DesertLover http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265201 DesertLover Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:02:13 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265201 twoninerkilo ah yes ... the Trojan Horse gambit ... :lol: twoninerkilo

ah yes … the Trojan Horse gambit … :lol:

]]> By: KaosKlerik http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265198 KaosKlerik Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:49 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265198 <blockquote>On March 12th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, Darwin Akbar said: Michelle - I vote you agree to be interviewed after they let you interview Foer on Hot Air…but you get to go first to keep them from welching.</blockquote> A-hem it's welshing, not welching. M. WELCH

On March 12th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, Darwin Akbar said:
Michelle – I vote you agree to be interviewed after they let you interview Foer on Hot Air…but you get to go first to keep them from welching.

A-hem it’s welshing, not welching.

M. WELCH

]]> By: twoninerkilo http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265196 twoninerkilo Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:52:16 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265196 "Beware of Greeks bareing gifts" “Beware of Greeks bareing gifts”

]]> By: Darwin Akbar http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265192 Darwin Akbar Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:49:53 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265192 Michelle - I vote you agree to be interviewed after they let you interview Foer on Hot Air...but you get to go first to keep them from welching. Michelle – I vote you agree to be interviewed after they let you interview Foer on Hot Air…but you get to go first to keep them from welching.

]]> By: AniMEL http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-265175 AniMEL Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:31:33 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/12/now-the-new-republic-wants-to-talk/#comment-265175 "We don't want to talk about Beauchamp, but look...here's a bunch of other stuff we're working on that you'll like!" I was snorting before I even got to the end. “We don’t want to talk about Beauchamp, but look…here’s a bunch of other stuff we’re working on that you’ll like!”

I was snorting before I even got to the end.

]]>