The Spitzer resignation countdown clock; Update: Spitzer t-shirt-mania!; Update: Reports say resignation effective Monday; Update: O.J.-like media circus awaiting 11:30am presser; Update: “I have begun to atone.”

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 12, 2008 06:49 AM

1elresign.jpg

My reaction to the Spitzer statement: The words did not match his still-defiant attitude. The continued emphasis on “private failings.” The continued lack of humility. The continued emphasis on his commitment to the “public good.” He’d best serve the “public good” by staying out of the public eye and quit his do-gooder crusading.

As for Silda Wall Spitzer’s presence next to her cheating hubby again, Maggie Gallagher asks: “…can we at least end this barbaric practice of dragging your wife before the cameras while you confess your shameful guilt? If she wasn’t there in the hotel room when you did your crime, don’t ask her to do your time.”

Well, nobody forced her to stand there. We have free will. Silda made her choice.

Here’s the vid. Here’s the transcript.

One last thought: Notice how the coward Spitzer can’t bother to look at his wife.

11:48am Eastern. Rough transcript: In the past few days, I have begun to atone for my private failings with my wife Silda, children…remorse will always be with me…words cannot describe grateful compassion they have shown me…i am deeply sorry that i did not live up to what was expected on me…to every new yorker…i sincerely apologize…i look at my time as governor with a sense of what might have been…i…have accomplished a great deal…cannot let my private failings interrupt…work…i am resigning from the office of governor…march 17…as i leave public life, i will first do what i need to do to help and heal myself and my family…will try to work outside of politics to serve the public good. I hope all of new york will join my prayers for David Paterson…

***
1elsuv.jpg

***
Scroll down for updates…resignation reportedly effective Monday…11:11am Eastern: Media stakeout, black SUV outside Spitzer’s apartment…Fox reports that Mrs. Spitzer will accompany Eliot Mess…

1client.jpg
***

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

He’s been riding his high horse so long, he can’t make himself dismount quick enough. The WSJ reports:

New York governor Eliot Spitzer resisted mounting calls for his resignation Tuesday, as he first tried to work out an agreement with prosecutors not to file criminal charges against him…

…Mr. Spitzer’s lawyers argued Tuesday that the governor didn’t violate federal money-laundering or structuring laws because he didn’t hide the transactions, which were in his name and from his bank accounts. In negotiations with prosecutors of Manhattan’s U.S. Attorney’s office, his lead lawyer, Michele Hirshman, a partner at the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, said it would be unfair to charge Mr. Spitzer. People familiar with the legal team’s thinking say Ms. Hirshman argued that men who use the services of prostitutes rarely get charged with crimes, even when prostitutes and ringleaders do.

Mr. Spitzer won’t resign until he reaches an agreement with the government not to pursue charges, say those familiar with his legal team’s thinking.

A poll released late Tuesday found that 70% of New Yorkers think Mr. Spitzer should resign, while 66% believe he should be impeached and removed from office if he doesn’t. “It’s a big thumbs down,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion, which conducted the poll. “It points to just how politically untenable his position is right now.”

Even if Mr. Spitzer resigns, 49% of New Yorkers said he should face criminal charges. The telephone poll conducted Tuesday surveyed 624 registered voters and had a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points.

Any legal case could be significant for Mr. Spitzer’s future. Whether or not he remains in politics, the 48-year-old Mr. Spitzer likely would lose his license to practice law if convicted of a felony.

Robert Bidinotto weighs in on the moral transgressions of Eliot Spitzer that the media continue to ignore.

And my friends at The People’s Cube, who lampooned Operation Corner Office two years ago, have the photoshop of the day:

1eliothorse.jpg

Get gone, already.

***

Update 9:30am Eastern. It was inevitable: Spitzer t-shirt-mania!

Hot apparel: Client #9 shirts.

I like these better from The People’s Cube:

1client002.jpg

Update 10:00am Eastern. Still waiting…

Update 10:05am Eastern. Fox and AP say resignation will be effective Monday.

Update 10:12am Eastern: New word via Derb – Spitzenfreude.

Update 10:16am Eastern. Speaking of Spitzenfreude, Lone Star Times photoshops The Playas’ Ball.

Update 10:30am Eastern. Allah’s on Spitzer Watch. CNBC apparently got the scoop that the actual resignation will come down at 11:00am…now closer to 11:30am.

Update 10:46am Eastern. More Spitzenfreuder from the brilliant Iowahawk.

Update 10:56am Eastern. There’s an O.J.-like media swarm outside Spitzer’s high-rise apartment. In Albany, Republican State Senate majority leader Joe Bruno called on NY to move forward and prepare for transition.

Update 11:01am Eastern. A zinger from Michael Ramirez.

Update 11:13am Eastern. Watch the “Apartment Stakeout Cam” at FoxNews.com.

Posted in: Democrats

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Dave Lucas: A Watched Pot Never Boils
  2. THE SPITZER COUNTDOWN CLOCK « The Catskill Commentator
  3. JammieWearingFool
  4. Neocon News » Rushing to conclusions on Eliot Spitzer?
  5. A Blog For All
  6. Jules Crittenden » Spitzer to Resign
  7. Eliot Spitzer: Thug | BitsBlog
  8. Eliot Spitzer Resigns…REALLY! » The American Mind
  9. Reformed Hippie
  10.   Eliot Spitzer Resigns: “I have begun to atone for my private failings” - Shallow Nation
  11. Oblogatory Anecdotes - Hillary and Client # 9
  12. The McCain Mutiny » McCain News
  13. Eliot Spitzer Resigns « Axis of Right
  14. HASTA LA VISTA, SPITZ « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  15. HASTA LA VISTA, SPITZ « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  16. SPITZER’S SUCCESSOR MAY EVEN BE WORSE « Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger
  17. Brass Knuckles › Spitzer was Framed!

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #264989
    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Michele Hirshman, Spitzer’s former deputy attorney general and now a member of the high-powered New York law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, has been retained to represent the governor.

    Aha – if she’s his lawyer, she can’t testify against him when they go digging into his past as Attorney General.

  2. #264995
    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, Rational Thought said:

    As he attempts to gain sympathy for himself and his “private failings,” I am reminding myself that were Spitzer the potential federal prosecutor in this case he would be grinding that man at the microphone into small pieces, showing no mercy whatsoever, and lecturing us on how EVERYONE must follow the law, no matter who he is. Spitzer would stop at nothing short of utterly destroying the life and livelihood of that man at the microphone, and he’d have a damn good remorseless time doing it. In fact, as you’re pitying his wife up there, remember that were Spitzer the prosecutor, he would have illegally leaked documents from the case showing that that sympathetic figure had some way benefited from/known about the man’s crimes, thus destroying her, too. And if anyone dared come to that man at the microphone’s defense, Spitzer, as prosecutor, would turn his vengeful, narcissistic, pitiless eyes to that person, seeking his utter personal and professional destruction as well. That’s the problem with being a ruthless bastard, Eliot. When you need allies, everyone remembers what a ruthless bastard you are.

  3. #264998
    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, Ron Rockstar said:

    AlohaGuy, you are talking about New York, a democrat governor, a drunk with leftist ideology media. I don’t believe they are going to do any digging. After Monday expect to see this story buried deep, as everyone will then say that they can’t discuss an ongoing investigation. In a year or two we will hear that all the evidence is circumstantial at best and that the state has no desire to spend taxpayer money on a case about sex.

  4. #265010
    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, Boomer said:

    On March 12th, 2008 at 12:51 pm, terrig said:
    When I got out of the Army I married a Navy pilot who I thought walked on water. We weren’t married 7 months when the first affair happened and by 18 months I cashed in my chips and got out

    terrig as a retired Air Force aviator being a womanizing alcoholic was the expected behavior of some of my brethren even some of the ladies breaking in to the flying business could drink most of us under the table and would abuse the male that caught their eye. I was doing pretty good on the alcoholic side when I met Mrs. Boomer and feel head over heels. Somehow I have managed to stay faithful to her for 25 years of marriage with the understanding that if I did stray she would sew me in the sheets and beat me with a baseball bat to knock some sense in me. Then she would take me for any and all assets we had gained during our partnership. Fear can be a health thing. :)

    I do realize love is blind, but I always have the feeling with the rich a marriage is only a merger to gain more wealth and infidelity appears to be their normal behavior. I do feel sorry for the daughters of the Spitzer’s the shame and embarrassment those young ladies must suffer may require years of counseling of overcome. The upside is one less power corrupted politician will no longer have a direct effective on the lives of the citizens of New York State with many more to go.

  5. #265019
    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:53 pm, Paul-Cincy said:

    Anyone else notice his line about holding himself to the same standards he held others to was a bit hollow in light of the fact he’s only holding himself to that standard AFTER HE GOT CAUGHT! What about adhering to that standard BEFORE he got caught. The guy’s value system is all screwed up. He actually isn’t making much sense.

  6. #265024
    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:56 pm, nbarry said:

    Aloha Guy,

    The honcho of the escort service is being represented by a woman with the same name (Jennifer Brown) as another attorney on Spitzer’s staff during his first term as attorney general. This Jennifer Brown was later counsel for NOW’s legal defense fund. Hmmm!

  7. #265038
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:08 pm, emjem24 said:
    BlameAmericaLast said:
    Well well well…looks like the NYT couldn’t help itself with this inference…

    The federal officials sought to emphasize that Mr. Spitzer, a Democrat, had not been singled out by the Republican administration, although allegations of political interference dogged the Justice Department during the tenure of the former attorney general, Alberto R. Gonzales, who left office last year after lawmakers in both parties called for his removal. The Spitzer investigation began in July and Mr. Gonzales resigned in August last year; it is not clear whether he knew about it.

    Uh huh…now it’s BUSH who was behind this, riiiiiiiight.

    Hey, BAL, if it isn’t about a Republican administration’s “dirty politics” to these libs then it’s sex. Sex with high-class prostitutes just mean’s Spitzer has “personal failings” but isn’t a “terrible person” in their view.

    No, no, let Pres. Bush be their fall guy. No personal responsibility angle here. What I want to know is: why aren’t marital vows taken as seriously (for both Dems/Repubs) as the quest for power? When did people in this country start to look away or pretend that infidelity doesn’t hurt others? Yeah, people are human but Spitzer had been diddling prostitutes for at least 8-10 years. That took considerable subterfuge, planning, lying which to me smacks of a double life this guy had been leading.

    This exact same thing happened to my sister-in-law and she stood by her dirtbag of a husband (and they’d also been married for at least 20 years). They even went through marriage counseling but when he wouldn’t fully commit to his marriage (or forsake his picadillo) was the day my sister-in-law said adios to this creep.

    I’m particularly incensed by this behavior because not only did it occur in my family it seems to be tolerated by society at large. Marriage is just a joke, not something real, not regarded highly. When our leaders treat marriage lightly and society at large accepts infidelity by somebody like Spitzer (and lefties were making excuses for him) is when our country’s family structure is completely obliterated.

    No, it’s not just about sex or sexual addiction. If Spitzer didn’t want to stay married he should have just ended it instead of dragging his wife (if this is the case) through the mud with him…what a pig. If she tolerated it, then what does that say about her?

  8. #265047
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:15 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Yeah, the lefties are making an excuse out of this. They claim that prostitution doesn’t “hurt” anyone.

    Really? Just talk to those who were former prostitutes. It may or may not cause physical harm, but it almost certainly causes emotional harm down the road.

  9. #265051
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    I can get past the sex with a prostitute thing, but what is extremely troubling is: his oath of office is sure to include upholding the laws on the books, & what could have happened if a less than ethical member of society got ahold of the info. that he was seeing prostitutes. Say a member of the mafia got the info. Does anyone think they would have used that for cover the next time NY decided to crackdown on the mafia. He endangered all of society when he allowed himself to possibly be compromised by these types. There is your answer to the lefties who say it was just sex.

  10. #265055
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Glamchild said:

    Who’s dumb enough to think that $4,000.00 won’t trigger an IRS investigation ????

    Anything over $1000.00 is subject to Reporting. And, especially if it’s being transferred on a regular basis.

    —By a public figure.

    Hel-lo ???

    LESSON: Use Travlers Cheques. There’s no paper trail, yet they don’t carry the risk and suspicion of shady cash transactions.

    Duh.

  11. #265058
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Glamchild said:

    $4,000.00 in cash going in and out of the Bank on a regular basis.

    Stupidity.

  12. #265062
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, Glamchild said:

    I’m gonna do a little experiment.

    I’m gonna go get a briefcase and load it up with $4,000.00 in cash (small bills) , and then go out for a little stroll.

    Let’s see what happens.

  13. #265064
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:28 pm, nbarry said:

    Since Michelle posted the portrait os Spitzer as Napoleon, here is some musical accompaniment for his retreat.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCem9BC1k9w

  14. #265073
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, rpg1616 said:

    All this “love is blind” talk is naive nonsense. Silda is an Ivy Leaguer with a powerhouse law firm background. She knows what is up, just like Hillary. This is obviously a marriage of convenience where he can do whatever he wants as long as it is discreet, and in exchange she gets to ride along on his coattails of fame, power, and money. That’s why even at this point she is focused on his position and insisting that he not resign instead of looking for the exit or focusing on the relationship. There is nobody to feel sorry for here except the children.

  15. #265085
    On March 12th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Anything over $1000.00 is subject to Reporting. And, especially if it’s being transferred on a regular basis.

    Actually, it’s CASH transactions of over $10,000. Not $1,000. But if there are numerous transactions in the thousands of dollars, then it’s also reportable if the bank deems it suspicious.

  16. #265093
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, emjem24 said:

    rpg1616 said:
    All this “love is blind” talk is naive nonsense. Silda is an Ivy Leaguer with a powerhouse law firm background. She knows what is up, just like Hillary. This is obviously a marriage of convenience where he can do whatever he wants as long as it is discreet, and in exchange she gets to ride along on his coattails of fame, power, and money. That’s why even at this point she is focused on his position and insisting that he not resign instead of looking for the exit or focusing on the relationship. There is nobody to feel sorry for here except the children.

    You mean like an open marriage, right? If that were true that would be pretty sick… especially with children involved. Silda Spitzer either loves her husband or deliberately staying for other reasons (like her children). Either way, it’s a really messed up situation. You can’t help feeling that the only person not sorry for what happened will be Spitzer himself…

  17. #265096
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    #96 nbarry said:

    That’s interesting! There are no coincidences in crooked politics.

    and #93, Ron, you’re probably right. I’m hoping the feds dig deep. Oh wait, never mind.

  18. #265106
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And a quote…

    DAVID LETTERMAN: Did you happen to see the press conference? Very dramatic. Eliot Spitzer was there. He had yellow crime scene tape draped around his pants. It was crazy.

  19. #265117
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    Huffington has a picture of the “lady” in question, probably her as the description fits her profile as given in the news.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/10/emperors-club-all-about-_n_90768.html

  20. #265124
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    ezupirate, one of those ladies claims a Masters in Public Relations. Looks like he can keep her on the pay”roll”.

  21. #265134
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:43 pm, jungatheart said:

    I’m sure she’s beautiful in person too but, in order for her to be worth $4k, I’d have to be dead when it was over from ecstatic overload.

  22. #265138
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    at those prices she would need to be so hot that when she walked in the room my nose hairs caught fire & my ear wax melted. LOL

  23. #265143
    On March 12th, 2008 at 3:57 pm, nbarry said:

    All of these profiles are interesting, but what is really critical is whether or not the Club included the legal disclaimer in any of its webpages. “This is not an offer of prostitution. Money exchanged is for time and companionship only. Anything that may occur is the personal choice of two or more consenting adults of legal age, and nothing additional is contracted for, requested to be contracted for, or compensated for in any manner.” If it was, the four defendants may try to use this as their legal defense, namely, that the money their customers paid was not for sexual conduct, and thus their business was legal and not prostitution.

  24. #265146
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    nbarry, usually they get them on money laundering charges vs. the act of prostitution. I think that is what is the basis for the indictments that came down, but too lazy to relook at the docs.

  25. #265161
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:12 pm, nbarry said:

    You may be right, but unless they were evading their income taxes, it’s hard to see how a money laundering charge could stick if the underlying conduct was in fact legal. The feds will most likely try to threaten and intimidate the defendants into a plea deal. But if the escort bosses decide to stand and fight, we might see a hairsplitting contest over whether or not that disclaimer is valid and the prostitution laws are unconstitutionally vague. The defendants were already lawyered up at the time of their arrest.

  26. #265169
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    My guess is one of the underlings will crack as the top dogs likely kept most of the money & they can’t afford to keep fighting the Feds.

  27. #265177
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Wow, I leave for a few hours and the defecation contacted the rotary oscillator.

    hell.has.frozen.over???

    Still, I want to see moving trucks.

    AlGore quit too and he is still jetting around the world as the POTUS.

    I will not admit I was wrong about this until he has gone (and has left the good silverware).

  28. #265183
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, SHoward said:

    Soap,

    with the money his family has, he probably had better silverware than the governor’s mansion when he was 12.

    He ain’t from Arkansas…

    -Howie

  29. #265186
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    I’m not from NY, and did not know anything about the Governor-to-be, David Paterson. So I thought I would check him out. Interesting fellow. One of the biggest “critisims” I read was that he is very conciliatory and wants everyone to get along. I dug a little deeper and found his primary positions during the campaign:
    State funding for embryonic stem cell research
    Politically-motivated flip-flopping on wire-tapping
    And perhaps the worst one ever… Restricting police officers from using deadly force when they are in the line of fire. They would be charged with manslaughter!
    So is NY jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire?

  30. #265187
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, terrig said:

    Boomer, if I had had a child with him, I may have very well stayed. My second husband and I both had first marriages end with affairs and we got a pre-nup that sounds like your situation. :)

  31. #265188
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    When I heard Spitzer might try to use his resignation as a bargaining chip with the Feds, it reminded me of a Law & Order where a serial child molester/murderer bargained the death penalty off the table by telling where he buried some of the bodies.

  32. #265190
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, BrianNY said:

    #58 DBNinKY said:

    It will speak volumes about the ineptitude of the Obama camp if they do not credibly link this to our Hillary.

    In relation to the fact that Hillary Clinton personally supported, backed, campaigned, vouched and then basked in the glow and praise for this scumbag at every step of his political career…and now, won’t utter any condemnation against his recently disclosed character and behavior; but rather, has stated twice now that “her thoughts are with Eliot and his family”…then yeah, Obama would have to be an idiot not to use this as an issue against the “quality of her judgement.” Just as Hillary is using Obama’s criminal friend Rezko against him.

    And don’t forget, the DNC has already and successfully used the case of one Republican homosexual’s immorality against the entire Republican Party as a national issue in 2006, so this wouldn’t be “virgin” territory for democrats.

  33. #265191
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, BrianNY said:

    #61 Rusty said:

    No one hammered Rudy when Senator Vitter …got himself into the same hot water. No one connected the misdeeds of Senator Craig to Governor Romney.

    As no one is tying Spitzer to Obama either. Please understand the State Party ties that Hillary Clinton established with her protege Eliot Spitzer. She personally vouched for Spitzer during his three State-wide campaigns, and even maligned Spitzer’s opponents as not being “qualified” to run against Mr. Spitzer.

    I respectfully disagree with your attempts at Republican “equivalence” regarding this matter. If you can establish state-party political and platform connections between “Rudy and Vitter” or “Craig and Romney” that are as incestuous as Clinton-Spitzer, I am willing to listen.

    Maybe Rudy-Kerik would be a more appropriate link for what you are trying to establish, and I believe Rudy was repeatedly hammered by Hillary for that.

    (Interesting fact: Bernard Kerik was was a dirt-poor New Yorker who was raised by a prostitute – Eliot Spitzer was a billion dollar trust fund New Yorker who grew up to seek prostitutes.

    Blessings, bro.

  34. #265194
    On March 12th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, jungatheart said:

    I still say this guy is crazy to have gone to a prostitute. I’m sure the feds can put pressure on the women to tell everything they know about him and the other clients too. Spitzer knows the kind of tactics law enforcement uses so what in the world made him think he could get away with this? He had to have known that if any of the women’s clients were caught, the rest would be caught too. Could anyone be this arrogant?

  35. #265214
    On March 12th, 2008 at 5:11 pm, BrianNY said:

    #124 jungatheart said:

    Spitzer knows the kind of tactics law enforcement uses so what in the world made him think he could get away with this?

    Spitzer’s transgressions should be matched with the same level of prosectorial zeal that he exhibited against his victims, and no more.

  36. #265230
    On March 12th, 2008 at 5:28 pm, Glamchild said:

    Do Travelers Cheques come in large bills?

    I seem to remember a time when you could get ‘em in denominations of $500.00’s etc…

    Never leave home without your American Express Traveler’s Cheques. You never know when you’ll have a hankering for a 5, or 8-diamond woman, on the sly.

  37. #265243
    On March 12th, 2008 at 5:47 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The price of a 7 diamond prostitute – $4000.

    Mini-bar $700.

    The look on Spitzer’s face when the feds came knocking – priceless.

  38. #265252
    On March 12th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On March 12th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, steveegg said:
    The $64,000 question – Just how many NY Senate Dems were willing to do what their federal counterparts weren’t willing to do 9 years ago?

    The $64,000,000 question – Why were they willing to do it?

    ELECTION YEAR.

    They aren’t SAYING anything about THAT! (New York BUDGET is their priority??????? Give me a break!!!)

    They have learned a tremendous amount about the fact that if they do not SAY it, there isn’t a NEWSPAPER TRAIL.

    That is also why they talk about repercussions to Hillary being abut “drivers’ licences for ILLEGALS!”

    Excuse me – WE ALL KNOW WHAT THE REAL REPERCUSSIONS FOR HILLARY IN THIS SCANDAL ARE, and while she is hoping to win the right to contend against OPEN BORDERS or NO BORDERS McCAIN, the last thing she has to worry about right now is a dead drivers’ license issue.

    But as long as the MSM doesn’t mention this REMINDER of COMMON SCANDALS over COMMONLY AND ROUTINELY PERFORMED FELONIES in the White House, her campaign remains viable.

    As do many other campaigns.

    It doesn’t help McCain either, for anyone to keep saying to media microphones that ONCE A MAN HAS BEEN UNFAITHFUL, HE CAN NEVER BE TRUSTED AGAIN.

    I’ve already heard some Republicans make that statement a few times when they clearly have Spitzer and Bill Clinton in mind, with a Toady Chappaquiddick and few other DIMS on the side.

    But with the GOP leadership and “Right Wing Media” still trying to make a go of McCain, Newt, Rudi, and a few others…

    Scandals and Lack of CHARACTER is an issue that NEITHER party wants in the news before November.

    That is how media will have a candidate like Hillary on the topic and still ask, “Will people vote for a woman?”

    How insipidly ridiculous does it have to get.

  39. #265305
    On March 12th, 2008 at 7:05 pm, JohnnyNJ said:

    Any guesses as to when “Kristen” appears on Larry King or does a Playboy interview?

    My guess, about 3 months.

  40. #265309
    On March 12th, 2008 at 7:18 pm, e.koenig said:

    Any guesses as to when “Kristen” appears on Larry King or does a Playboy interview?

    My guess, about 3 months.

    not really worth the wait…IMO and def not worth $1000+ an hour…

    http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=69041220

  41. #265320
    On March 12th, 2008 at 7:48 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    It’s amazing how the party of ethics and morales gives people like this a career boost. What a role model.

  42. #265323
    On March 12th, 2008 at 7:58 pm, Marshall Russ said:

    I thought Spitzer was supposed to be such a smart tough prosecutor. What an idiot. And I don’t know what is worse he or his wife who was obviously enabling him to carry on like this for so long.

  43. #265583
    On March 13th, 2008 at 9:15 am, governmentdrone said:

    On March 12th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, amigoneus said:

    Wow. Just wow.

    Didn’t call you names, just said it was a reaction I would expect from those types – left the obvious “but you seem to be a conservative” unsaid.

    But nice that you should resort to name calling instead of logical arguments.

    And as far as my handle goes, you couldn’t be farther from the truth in how you interpret it.

    I’ll be happy to debate with you the merits of the Patriot Act all day long, provided you check your emotions at the door, read and comprehend thoroughly what you have read, and keep the discourse at an adult level.

    Otherwise, I’ll simply thank you to stop with the personal insults. Pretty unbecoming, and adds nothing to the discussion really.

    By the way, the example you cite of the $10,000 gift that was used for a house down payment is exactly what I was talking about in my first post. You can presumably document that transaction and what was subsequently done with that money, so why worry about it being reported to Uncle Sam? If those reports shut down even one terrorist cell before they can strike, then it seems worth it to me.

  44. #265587
    On March 13th, 2008 at 9:22 am, governmentdrone said:

    If those reports shut down even one terrorist cell before they can strike, then it seems worth it to me.

    Or nab even one crooked politician.

  45. #265714
    On March 13th, 2008 at 11:42 am, DBNinKY said:

    On March 12th, 2008 at 11:26 am, Rusty said:

    “Politicians should go after their opponents, not after their opponents’ supporters.”

    I agree, but guilt by association can be a powerful political tool – especially when the opposition has a demonstrated record of not playing by the rules.

  46. #266112
    On March 13th, 2008 at 8:52 pm, secondsight said:

    safe bet: after a summer of contrition, his friend and mentor Alan Dershowitz will find Eliot a job at Harvard Law. Eliot will grow a bread, hit on free tail, and write Al Gore’s next fiction, The Joys of Socialism.

  47. #266113
    On March 13th, 2008 at 8:53 pm, secondsight said:

    oops, make that a kosher beard.

  48. #266152
    On March 13th, 2008 at 10:40 pm, USpace said:

    Spitzer’s garbage and a megalomaniac, he’s been bad news for years. It’s amazing that he got over 65% of the vote for Governor.

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe loves
    abusive prosecutors

    wasting money on weak cases
    then blackmailing defendants

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    sabotage your career

    give America a gift
    leave politics forever

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    never believe in karma

    what goes around never comes
    back around to bite your butt

    .
    http://www.freemarketcure.com

    http://haltterrorism.com

    http://absurdthoughtsaboutgod.blogspot.com

    :)
    .

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook