See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:00 pm, rw said:

   Videos with talking snowmen will be considered racist, right?

2. #2
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, tre said:

   So, how can I spend 30 seconds saying, “He ain’t done nothing noteworthy, but he sure do talk good.” over and over and over again.

3. #3
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, Khyris said:

   “You can be anti-abortion and pro-execution. It’s oxymoronic.”

   How do people get this dumb? How can people not comprehend simple concepts like the difference between “innocent” and “guilty”?

   At least he’s consistent… obviously he can consider the founding fathers “terrorists” if he can’t comprehend that terrorists by definition are “guilty” of the intentional murder of “innocent” civilians. Shame on GW and TJ… shooting all those poor innocent civilains in red coats…

4. #4
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, Yiddish Steel said:

   Word!… Uhh… Yeah… Edgy incite from the street, y’all. It’s just the man always tryin’ to keep another Pell Grant, State-U educated, urban poet down. Just another “C”"O”"N”-spiracy.

5. #5
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:07 pm, capitano said:

   Maybe we could talk David Mamet into a 30 second video comparison between Obama’s pastor and David Mamet’s rabbi, about whom Mamet wrote:

   Prior to the midterm elections, my rabbi was taking a lot of flack. The congregation is exclusively liberal, he is a self-described independent (read “conservative”), and he was driving the flock wild. Why? Because a) he never discussed politics; and b) he taught that the quality of political discourse must be addressed first—that Jewish law teaches that it is incumbent upon each person to hear the other fellow out.

   Mamet credited his rabbi with turning him around politically, not by haranguing him with hate speech, but by encouraging him to hear his opponents out. I guess we now know why Michelle Obama is so negative on the U.S. — given the spiritual guidance she has been receiving.

6. #6
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:17 pm, Jim M. said:

   Can’t wait to see Larry Fitzgerald’s entry…

7. #7
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, nyc123me said:

   Civil war would seem to be looming.. the foaming-at-the-mouth lefts can have California.. wonder how they’d feel about handing it over to Mexico then huh…

8. #8
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, terrig said:

   This guy ever heard of deodorant, might help that wet underarm problem he’s got. He’s got other problems but it’s easy to say the wet underarm is the least of them.

9. #9
   On March 13th, 2008 at 4:21 pm, englishqueen01 said:

   I have an idea. We’ll see if I can get it together tonight.

10. #10
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:28 pm, NeoConNews said:

    I don’t think Obama has enough policy to fill 30 seconds.

11. #11
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, MrVIBEMAN said:

    The only thing he said that makes sense is that ‘RIGHT means CORRECT’. He should’ve just stopped there.

12. #12
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, docflash said:

    I can do it in less than 30 seconds,That Rap was Crap.

13. #13
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:40 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    A video camera and Youtube: everyone can produce a commercial about whatever they want. Let the PR and counter-PR campaigns begin!

    And, of course, let the individuals discern what’s BS, funny or whatever….

14. #14
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, OneofThem said:

    I still love how MoveOn, which was formed to defend Former President Clinton, is supporting Obama over his wife.

15. #15
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, J S Ragman said:

    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, Khyris said:
    “You can be anti-abortion and pro-execution. It’s oxymoronic.”

    Like being pro-abortion and anti-death penalty is any less oxymoronic?

    Kill the babies, but let Tookie and Mumia go free?

16. #16
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, Lan Astaslem said:

    …Fade from black.
    Scene: Smiling, attractive young college student (male or female), holding open notebook.
    Script: I would like to take the next 30 seconds to enlighten you about Obama’s amazing record of accomplishments.

    Glances at notebook. Returns gaze to camera.

    Blink, blink, blink, blink, blink…

    tick tock tick tock tick tock tick tock

    Eyes begin to dart back and forth. Smile begins to waver…

    Begin fade to black…
    Faintly heard, and fading: “Hope! Change!”

17. #17
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:46 pm, Thomas said:

    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:28 pm, NeoConNews said: I don’t think Obama has enough policy to fill 30 seconds.

    I’m planning on making an entry that scrolls his voting record along the screen for 30 seconds, and highlighting every time he missed a vote or voted “present” with a “DING!” sound effect along with a running counter at the bottom of the screen.

18. #18
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:49 pm, John Ansell said:

    Can somebody remind me why Moveon was started in the first place? For the life of me I thought they were in support of the Clintons.

19. #19
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:52 pm, J S Ragman said:

    That guy’s video was futtup.

    I wish he would just shut up.

20. #20
    On March 13th, 2008 at 4:53 pm, Thomas said:

    The MoveOn website was launched initially to oppose the Republican-led effort to impeach Clinton. Initially called “Censure and Move On,” it invited visitors to add their names to an online petition stating that “Congress must Immediately Censure President Clinton and Move On to pressing issues facing the country.”

    In a word, yes. To support Clinton.

21. #21
    On March 13th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, right_on said:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl32Y7wDVDs

    To sum up…..here are his proposals with comments:

    “……I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems…” (STAR WARS(SDI) HAS PROVEN VERY EFFECTIVE AS EVIDENCED BY THE ABILITY TO SHOOT DOWN THAT SATELLITE THIS PAST WEEK, BUT THE DEMOCRATS FOUGHT IT TOOTH AND NAIL AS “UNPROVEN”)

    <em>”…..I will not weaponize space...”(WE WILL BE SITTING DUCKS IN SPACE INSTEAD OF UTILIZING OUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS FROM THE SPACE PROGRAM TO DEFEND OURSELVES.)

    “…..I will slow development of future combat systems…”(JUST WHAT WE
    NEED….TO BE BEHIND OUR ENEMIES ON WEAPONS SYSTEMS)

    “…..and I will institute a “Defense Priorities Board” to ensure the quadrennial defense review is not used to justify unnecessary spending…”(HUH?)

    “…..I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons…”(GOOD LUCK GETTING N. KOREA, IRAN, RUSSIA TO ACTUALLY KEEP THEIR PROMISES…THEY NEVER HAVE)

    “…..and to seek that goal, I will not develop nuclear weapons…“(WE WILL BE SITTING DUCKS!)

    “…..I will seek a global ban on the dev elopment of fissile material…”(THAT MEANS WE WILL BE THE ONLY ONES OBEYING THE BAN)

    “…..and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert…“(AND HOW DO WE KNOW THEY WILL ALSO DO THE SAME?)

    “…..and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals…”(GREAT! HOW ARE WE GOING TO DEFEND OURSELVES AGAINST NUCLEAR ATTACKS)

    People, if he gets his way, we will become totally defenseless against Iran,
    North Korea, China and Russia et al. This is beyond
    disagreement on policies…..this is literally whether this country survives
    or not.

22. #22
    On March 13th, 2008 at 5:16 pm, IdiotCroissant said:

    I guess Teddy Kennedy in a Depends diaper telling us that we all could use a “change” is out of the question.

    No?

    Ok then, break out the wide angle lense and let’s get busy…

23. #23
    On March 13th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, Thomas said:

    On March 13th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, right_on said:
    “…..I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons…”(GOOD LUCK GETTING N. KOREA, IRAN, RUSSIA TO ACTUALLY KEEP THEIR PROMISES…THEY NEVER HAVE)

    “…..and to seek that goal, I will not develop nuclear weapons…“(WE WILL BE SITTING DUCKS!)

    “…..I will seek a global ban on the dev elopment of fissile material…”(THAT MEANS WE WILL BE THE ONLY ONES OBEYING THE BAN)

    These comments remind me exactly the same logic/mentality as the views of Code Pink (Video at 3:51 to 3:58)

24. #24
    On March 13th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, babbledabble said:

    If he really said all this (could it be just a youtube plant?)we are truly doomed. Is there any palce on earth we can run & hide from this mad man?

25. #25
    On March 13th, 2008 at 6:01 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    #21….ahem….right now the US possesses approximately 3,800 operationally deployed strategic nuclear warheads. What part of blowing the earth to hell and back don’t you understand?

26. #26
    On March 13th, 2008 at 6:02 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    and don’t forget, each warhead can equate to 370 kilotons. (reminder: Big Boy was 22 kiltons)….

    

27. #27
    On March 13th, 2008 at 6:45 pm, terrig said:

    I just got an idea while watching “Bob the Builder” with my 3 y/o son. I will link all the Obama messages where he says “yes, we can” and change it to the Bob crew saying “yes, we can”. That should go over well with the moonbats. Wonder if BO watches a lot of “Bob the Builder”, he has his tag line down pat.

28. #28
    On March 13th, 2008 at 6:48 pm, Bicyea said:

    Typical cheap liberals. Why pay to have a job done when you can get someone to do the job for free and give them nothing but a fly-by 15 min of fame. And being stupid libs they will be lining up to do it while crying about their friend that works for an ad agency getting layed off because of lack of work.

    Stupid is as Stupid does.

29. #29
    On March 13th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, ajmontana said:

    piece together all his answers to roll call votes over the past year, “I will not commit” should be his campaign slogan. title it.
    “SnowJobama”

30. #30
    On March 13th, 2008 at 7:12 pm, graysonret said:

    I watched the video. Another idiot who spouting some fantasies, he thinks are fact, especially history. Probably never graduated from H.S. On second thought, the way schools are these days, he could have been an honors student. Heck, I’ve got a wife, who isn’t even a citizen, who could run rings around him in debate, especially about Founding Fathers, and the Constitution. Again, on second thought, I wouldn’t want to embarrass her by having her spend time with such a jerk.

31. #31
    On March 13th, 2008 at 7:16 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Too easy: Just submit 30 seconds of Jeremiah Wright’s chickens-coming-home-to-roost, God-damn-America and the Rich White People rants.

    So, I am proud of who I am (a white American man). What does that make me in the Obamas’ idealistic vision of America? I know what his “pastor” thinks of me…

32. #32
    On March 13th, 2008 at 9:33 pm, right_on said:

    #25…ahem, yourself…

    Mutually Assured Destruction…they (our nuclear weapons) were never meant to be used for anything other than the threat of use. Apparently, that concept has worked rather well.

    Has any nation (including the former USSR) who has possessed a nuclear weapon since after WWII, ever used one? If not, why not? MAD!

    Does anyone with a sense of logic believe, that without the threat that simple possession of these weapons mean, that despotic entities, who may possess them, would not use them against the western civilizations?

    What part of blowing the earth to hell and back don’t you understand?

    What kind of argument is this? It is emotion-based nonsense. It’s just like saying, “there are millions and millions of guns out there…what part of killing everyone on Earth don’t you understand?”

    The US has this nuclear arsenal for the same reason many of use have more than one gun. You never know when or where or how many you will need. I pray we never again have to use a nuke, just like I pray I’ll never have to use one of my guns against another human being, but that doesn’t mean I won’t ever use one when it is needed. I believe that is also the rationale of our military regarding any force, nuclear or otherwise.

    BTW…those quotes are not mine. They came with the piece I copied for all to read and consider.

33. #33
    On March 13th, 2008 at 9:44 pm, e.koenig said:

    meatpieandtatters said:

    #21….ahem….right now the US possesses approximately 3,800 operationally deployed strategic nuclear warheads. What part of blowing the earth to hell and back don’t you understand?

    meatpieandtatters said:

    and don’t forget, each warhead can equate to 370 kilotons. (reminder: Big Boy was 22 kiltons)….
    

    nothing says dead like a glowing barren wasteland.

    hey if we wanted to cut down on our nuke arsenal we could have some pretty nice 4th of july shows…although that might be considered “weaponizing space”

34. #34
    On March 14th, 2008 at 8:44 am, Ron said:

    IdiotCroissant wrote

    I guess Teddy Kennedy in a Depends diaper telling us that we all could use a “change” is out of the question.

    No?

    Ok then, break out the wide angle lense and let’s get busy…

    Can you really PhotoShop that? Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner!!!

35. #35
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:44 am, Mr.J said:

    Just submit an ad with several video clips:
    1. Not saluting the flag during the pledge.
    2. Mumbling some inane reason about why he won’t wear the flag pin on his lapel any more.
    3. Michelle O. talking about her lack of pride in America.
    4. And a couple of the more juicy Jeremiah clips.

    Each item on its own could be dismissed or explained away, but all together, it begins to paint a picture.

36. #36
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:37 am, tgusa said:

    Hi America BHO here. I want to take a moment and try to sort out a recent controversy. My pastor sez that you whiteys are selling us blackies drugs, well I think that’s just wrong, drug dealing is against the law. He also informs me that you whites had it coming on 9-11. Again, wrong, whites had it coming long before 9-11, way before I went to Harvard. My all knowing mentor believes America is inherently unfair, selfish, mass murdering, racist and bigoted, ok but my hope is that they are stupid above all else. Look my message has always been change and recently you have heard the tapes of the white hating sermons my pastor has regularly orated. Hey I don’t agree with that, so what if I spent the last 20 years as a member of a church that does, so what if he was talking about my mother? Anyone who brings that up is a racist, er bigot, no, deserves it, wait, change, just look what you have done to my wife dang it!/sarcoff

    That’s what I hear. These people have not set race relations back they have thrown them on the ground and are stomping on them trying to crush them out. Take it somewhere else Adolph.

37. #37
    On August 9th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, dan708 said:

    If would-be Obama voters are making their own videos, we should help them! If these ignoramuses are heard often enough by moderates, it should help DEFEAT BHO!