About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Don’t look at this poster!

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 14, 2008 10:29 AM

chains.jpg

Muslims might be offended.

Posted in: Islam

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Bloodthirsty Liberal » Thou Shalt Not Offend
  2. The Child Slavery That Dare Not Speak Its Name : The Sundries Shack
  3. A Triptych Of Offensive Advertising » Pursuing Holiness
  4. Don Singleton
  5. Magic Statistics - “I accept no responsibility for statistics, which are a form of magic beyond my comprehension.” — Robertson Davies » Schools refuse to display forced marriage poster
  6. Civilized, eh? at The Mad Rants of a Raving Genius

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:34 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Offensive is in the eye of the beholder.

    There is no right to NOT be offended.

  2. #2
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:36 am, NeoConNews said:

    Yeah, because forced marriage is one of those issues that we need to remain fair and balanced about.

    Eugh.

  3. #3
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:37 am, yt1300inHtown said:

    I didn’t see the “I” or “M” word anywhere in that whole story.

    The images are hard hitting to someone…we just aren’t sure who I guess.

  4. #4
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:37 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Forced or arranged marriages are quite traditional in some cultures. I’ve known a few fellows who were going home to India to meet their future wife and get married. Considering the divorce rate and number of miserable people here, a pre-arranged union by one’s parents, assuming they have everyone’s best interest in mind, might not be a bad idea.

  5. #5
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:39 am, BrianNY said:

    I see a strategy against those explicit ads meant to tweek US conservatives by liberal creators such as Benneton, Kenneth Cole, Abercrombie and Fitch, etc.

    Just get the ball of inevitable “censorship” rolling by worrying aloud how Muslims might react.

  6. #6
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:43 am, sammy316 said:

    Forcing kids to marry just to get more land or goats or whatever dowry might be available is not cool man, not cool.

    This kind of crap may fly in India or any land of perpetual outrage where goats and cattle mean something, but in the civilized world we like our marriages short and painful. Well not all of course, some people do beat the odds.

  7. #7
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:45 am, MrVIBEMAN said:

    Taters, tell that to the 9, 11, or 14 year-olds being forced into marriage with a 40 and 50 year-old men. In most ‘free’ countries, there are laws against carnal knowledge before a certain age (16 comes to mind in most cases, sometimes 18, like in the U.S.) So, any country that allows forced marriages to a student, is allowing child molestation. Any country that prohibits child molestation should be condemnign forced marriages.
    That doesn’t even take into account the civic rights of citizens. An 18 year-old girl in this country has the right to choose her husband. No if’s-and’s-or but’s. If she is being forced into a marriage not of her choosing, than her civic rights are being violated. England is suppose to be the same way.
    Where’s the ACLU and N.O.W.?
    *crickets*

  8. #8
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:46 am, fourstringfuror said:

    Offensive is in the eye of the beholder.

    There is no right to NOT be offended.

    Precisely. I reserve the exclusive to offend and to be offended.

  9. #9
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:46 am, fourstringfuror said:

    exclusive right*

  10. #10
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:51 am, uhangtight said:

    The skin color of the hands is definitely middle eastern or Arabic. Those hands are not British for sure. being Arabic I recognize this at least. However, I am not a Muslim, my grandfather was, God bless his soul, when he came to the US. he decided he was Christian now that he was a US citizen, as this is a Christian country. At least that was his personal thought process on the matter, of course he came during the years of 1888 and 1903.

    But as stated before no one has the right to NOT be offended. As a Christian I have learned this lesson. Those that get offended and go off the end are not filled with the Love Of Christ and love for their Fellow Man. Something Islam is seriously lacking…

  11. #11
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:52 am, davidleerothmann said:

    After reading that article, I’m left wondering who it is that is fording children to marry? Maybe Poles? Cockney cabbies? Vicars? Irish? Are Leeds and Luton the Jewish towns?

    Just who is it taking 9 and 10 year old girls out of school and forcing them to marry grown men? Hmmmm, I’m relying on the paper to give me information, but they’ve somehow left it out. Can someone help me, I seem to have missed a crucial fact in the story.

  12. #12
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:54 am, Boomer said:

    Since today is Friday we should have rioting in the streets right after the Mosques empty out. I fear the once mighty British Empire is truly doomed to part of the European Caliphate.

  13. #13
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:58 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Considering the divorce rate and number of miserable people here, a pre-arranged union by one’s parents, assuming they have everyone’s best interest in mind, might not be a bad idea.

    I second MrVIBEMAN, who said it better than I could.

    The entire notion of arranged marriage bothers me. Granted, there are some of-age women and men who (for cultural reasons) are okay with it. There are some rather conservative approaches to marriage from many fronts. I know a Christian couple who has dated for many years, is engaged, and will be married in June. They have not touched or kissed in accordance with their beliefs on chastity. I find it a little too rigid, but that was their free choice. Likewise, if a 20-year-old Indian woman wants her parents to arrange a marriage, I guess it’s her free choice, too.

    But many, many women aren’t allowed that freedom. And there’ve be stories of honor killings, maimings, and the like for a woman who refuses marriage. Little girls are given to much older men (read: old enough to be her grandfather). And we all know the purpose of it - sex. A perverted sexual mentality.

    You can’t combat a problem if you’re not willing to face it head-on. Dancing around the issue is just a waste of time.

    The more England retreats behind the veil of political correctness, the closer it comes to being an extension of the Middle East.

  14. #14
    On March 14th, 2008 at 10:59 am, Ron Rockstar said:

    I have heard this type crap so much that I think I am getting the hang of it. So I will give it a try. I am offended that Muslims are offended. Behead those who offend Ron Rockstar.

  15. #15
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:02 am, Wade said:

    I could care less if Muslims are offended.

  16. #16
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:03 am, Lilycat said:

    God save us from political correctness run amok. If people who engage in these practices wish to continue their ways, then they shouldn’t emigrate from countries where such practices are considered wrong, or even illegal. If they don’t wish to respect the customs of their host country, they should leave. Of course that doesn’t help the poor children who are forced into what is tantamount to slavery. The parents should be found and made to account for their missing children. And jailed if necessary.

  17. #17
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:04 am, Lilycat said:

    What I meant to say was they shouldn’t immigrate to countries where such practices are considered wrong..etc.

  18. #18
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:04 am, Rusty said:

    I didn’t see the “I” or “M” word anywhere in that whole story.

    In the interest of fairness, Mrs. Malkin should probably edit that to “Muslims and Hindus might be offended.”

    When I go on my gay marriage spiel, I often describe marriage as a fundamental right. So forced marriage is an abomination to me. That two people can be trapped with life sentences like that is horrible. It’s not something people should be turning a blind eye to. So I applaud the creators of that poster. Good for them.

  19. #19
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:05 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    #9…I think I’d argue that WE ALL have the the ability to offend. To do so exclusively, for your own pleasure, wouldn’t be viewed favorable by those who also derive pleasure from same.

  20. #20
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:07 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    #18 ….the cultural filters are clearly in place.

  21. #21
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:08 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    …and aren’t there already enough offensive things around us to add to it?

    Try spreading a little positive energy!

  22. #22
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:08 am, nyc123me said:

    I find forced marriage offensive, but I guess that doesn’t matter - you have to be a minority to be officially offended.

  23. #23
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:14 am, graysonret said:

    England over the past few years, has become so much of a PC nation, that one is afraid to walk, talk or show any emotion in public, since it could be miscrued as offending some race/culture or group. When a cab driver goes to jail for accidently calling a Welsh woman, “English”, one wonders. Their students are hopeless in learning with many not even knowing how to read/write. Many don’t even know Churchill or the Magna Carta. No wonder Brits are leaving and immigrants (illegal and legal) are coming in to replace them. Want to know our future? Look to England for a glimpse of how socialism and pc behavior molds a once free and proud society.

  24. #24
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:17 am, vsatt said:

    Does anyone have a link to the entire poster? I’m not clear on why it would be posted in the schools to begin with.

    Are they trying to warn children about forced marriage? I think the kids are quite aware of the problem.

    Are they trying to get the students to report if any of their underage friends have been forced into a marriage? I have a problem with placing that kind of burden on the shoulders of those who have the least control in the situation.

    Any campaign like this should be targeted at adults who are in a position to protect the children. But maybe if I saw the whole poster, I could see what they’re trying to accomplish.

  25. #25
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:28 am, shooter said:

    I didn’t see the “I” or “M” word anywhere in that whole story.

    Those darned Amish.

  26. #26
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:28 am, MrVIBEMAN said:

    Good point Vsatt.

  27. #27
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:34 am, oregonelam said:

    Those darned Amish.

    Someone else sees the Amish conspiracy. Explains my theory on the enviromentalist movement to shut down power plants. I feel vindicated!

  28. #28
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:38 am, geminicontender said:

    Why do we care anymore whether Muslims are offended. They’re offended by everything ‘truthful’. Screw ‘em. Let’s get out of ‘pc’ mode and back to reality. If they don’t like it go home.

  29. #29
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:46 am, RaisedRight said:

    Image of the full poster.

  30. #30
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:51 am, bit_boy said:

    This thread make me wonder how common such a practice is in America (I use the word America rather than the United States to infuriate illegal Mexican’s who can read English because they think America means the North America Continent, yazir)

    Well, not much on Google about this subject in America except Muslims make a distinction between forced marriages and arranged marriages. The penalty for refusing either is the same. Guess what the penalty. Nope, not female circumcision. Worse.

    If you have not heard it before Here’s a little old time religion.

    In 624 Abu Bakr (Muhammad’s daily companion and one of his first believers and successor of Muhammad) gave Muhammad his daughter Aisha when she was six years old, although the actual marriage was not consummated until she was nine. (This fact is uncontested by all Muslim scholars and chroniclers without exception.) At the time of their marriage Muhammad was 54 years old (the age of her grandfather) – a difference of 45 years in their ages.

  31. #31
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:51 am, tre said:

    So they’re afraid to offend Muslims with that poster. Indeed, it seems SO many people are afraid of offending them.
    But, it seems they’re almost encouraged to offend Christians.

    But, the only difference between an offended Muslim and an offended Christian is 10 sticks of dynamite.

  32. #32
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:00 pm, Larraby said:

    At Harvard University, Muslim students just got the feckless Harvard administration to knuckle under to the Muslim students’ demand that men be kicked out of a university gymnasium for two hours every day. Where are all the brave professors at Harvard who talk about not having a religion determining secular matters? Where is Lawrence Tribe? This demand would never fly if students from any other religion made such a silly demand. Harvard’s administration said it was irrelevant if some male students said this two hour period was the only time in the day when they had no classes or no job or other school activties and needed to use the gym during those two hours. Harvard said it was irrelevant if those male students paid tuition and other fees that entitled them to use all of Harvard’s facilities. The Harvard administration actually said that the needs and even wishes of Muslim students trumped everything else. Havard has a new university slogan: “Islam uber alles”.

  33. #33
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:02 pm, RaisedRight said:

    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:51 am, tre said:
    So they’re afraid to offend Muslims with that poster. Indeed, it seems SO many people are afraid of offending them.
    But, it seems they’re almost encouraged to offend Christians.

    That’s for sure. I read an article on Townhall today that discusses how a Comedy Central show put the Catholic Church on trial against Oprah to see which is more EVIL. The Catholic Church “won.” I’m not actually shocked, I have come to expect trash from this network. However, I cannot imagine Comedy Central putting Islam on “trial.”

  34. #34
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, JHSII said:

    hmmm…normally I am against forced marriage, but if I were to be forced to marry, say, Kim Alexis, I wouldn’t have any problem with it.

    LOL

  35. #35
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, gandolphxx said:

    That seems like a very appropriate message for young folks - they do [should] have a choice - of course there are still 7th century desert cults who believe otherwise - also some other non-western cultures also still insist on matchmaking.

  36. #36
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:15 pm, nbarry said:

    Article 16 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares it a fundamental right to choose your spouse irrespective of race, religion or nationality. We can all thank Eleanor Roosevelt and her co-authors of the Declaration for this. I’ve noticed that some old-guard feminists have a problem with this Article, which may be why much of the invective aimed by lefties at Michelle has been sexually charged.

  37. #37
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:23 pm, procopy said:

    Mrs. Client #8?

  38. #38
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, dan708 said:

    This story is downright chilling because of the omission of critical facts. The Muslims have apparently been quietly - or openly - threatening British news media not to print critical stories of the “I” people, lest they get the “Bicycle Bomber” treatment.

  39. #39
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, Regulus said:

    The problem with authoritarian liberalism - er, political correctness (didn’t want of “offend” anyone) is that its effect on the vitality of society is similar to slowly turning up the water temperature on a frog.

    I once read a book review in which the reviewer traced the decline and fall of the Hellenistic civilizations to “A collective failure of nerve” (or as a National Lampoon article put it more bluntly, “The ancient Greeks invented democracy, then forgot how to use it while running around dressed up as girls”).

    History definitely seems to be repeating itself: In less than a century we’ve watched Great Britain go from the height of its power down to flinching and groveling before a malevolently disposed group of transplanted foreigners - that it dares not even name for fear of violence.

    Pathetic.

    Welcome to Eurabia, Britons. Just like in the frog example, by the time you figure out that you’ve irrevocably traded away your freedom for a false sense of comfort and security, it’ll be too late. Only at least the frog can say that somebody else turned the temperature up to boiling. The Brits, like the rest of Europe, did it to themselves.

    And lest we become too smug about Europe’s PC-driven fate, remember that they’re only a little further down the same path that we’re following; the silver lining is that when we, too, are finally overrun by a hostile, unassimilated and rapidly growing group of foreigners, at least the Mexicans are Christians.

  40. #40
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Rusty said:

    At Harvard University, Muslim students just got the feckless Harvard administration to knuckle under to the Muslim students’ demand that men be kicked out of a university gymnasium for two hours every day.

    It goes so much further! They let Jewish students avoid classes and tests during their holidays! And they don’t offer classes on Sundays to appease their Christian students! Where will it end!?

  41. #41
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:57 pm, amigoneus said:

    Rusty

    It goes so much further! They let Jewish students avoid classes and tests during their holidays! And they don’t offer classes on Sundays to appease their Christian students! Where will it end!?

    That is not even close to the same thing, and you’re smart enough to know that. A student (Jewish on a holiday or just hung over) not coming to class doesn’t impact others’ lives. Closing the gym down so that a select few complainers get their way impacts many people.

  42. #42
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, graysonret said:

    The Moslems don’t need terrorists to defeat us. We’re doing a fine job of it ourselves. All they have to do is sit back and wait for our fall. In London, and other cities there, it won’t be long before you hear mosques calling the faithful to prayer all day. They want loudspeakers too. I lived in England once, and went to school, in Kent County. Times have changed so much, I wonder if it is wise to visit it now. I’d be quite uncomfortable.

  43. #43
    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:59 pm, TXRose said:

    I just finished reading the latest from Phyliss Chesler
    on Islam. She started with the girls that were killed by
    their father, here, in TX and expanded on the subject.
    It is an excellent article. Here are two links that she
    referenced.
    http://www.nbc5i.com/newsarchive/15546408/detail.html

    http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontrent/dws/news/localnews/tv/stories/wfaa080308_wz_saidsisters.36b3726f.html

  44. #44
    On March 14th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, corkie said:

    In the interest of fairness, Mrs. Malkin should probably edit that to “Muslims and Hindus might be offended.”

    Wow. I kinda have to agree with Rusty on this one. Unless, however, the areas they mention make it obvious which cultures are being targeted.

    Does anyone have a grasp on the those neighborhoods?

  45. #45
    On March 14th, 2008 at 1:19 pm, corkie said:

    They let Jewish students avoid classes and tests during their holidays! And they don’t offer classes on Sundays to appease their Christian students! Where will it end!?

    Weak.

    BTW, are you sure that Harvard doesn’t offer any classes on Sundays?

  46. #46
    On March 14th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, zorro said:

    White burkas for the brides?

  47. #47
    On March 14th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, flmom said:

    Regulus and Graysonret

    You are both so right, I grew up in Britain, left when I was twenty years old, I saw first-hand the slow effect of PC gone wild. In fact one of the named cities, Leicester, is my home town. What attracted the immigrants to Britain was the largesse of our wefare system and, because India used to be a British colony, all were allowed British passports. Britain was deluged with these immigrants, and coupled with the lot that Idi Amin had thrown out of Uganda, it wasn’t long before entire inner cities were predominantly East Asian. The problem was that these immigrants did not integrate and kept their customs from their old country. One case I remember well, was a Sikh challenging the law regarding wearing a helmet on his motorcycle, his claim was that because his religion forbade him to remove his turban, he should not be required to wear a helmet. He won and it’s been downhill from there. Britain has been angling to become Eurabia since the sixties, it looks like they’ve finally earned full membership.

    BTW, Meatpie, I went to school with kids who had been promised in marriage to mates in India or Pakistan, none of them were happy about it.

  48. #48
    On March 14th, 2008 at 1:43 pm, zeroangel said:

    RaisedRight:

    That’s for sure. I read an article on Townhall today that discusses how a Comedy Central show put the Catholic Church on trial against Oprah to see which is more EVIL.

    Yah, that’s Lewis Black. He is an idiot. though I have to admit he IS funny when he is not talking about politics or religion (which isn’t often).

    The article you linked also mentioned South Park:

    This is the same hate-spewing channel that mocked the Pope on “South Park” and skewered Catholicism on the holiday special “Merry F—ing Christmas.”

    I have to say, that is just not fair to “South Park.” While the above is true. “South Park” hands it out equally to all, and maybe even more so to Jihadists. “South Park” has many time skewered Jihadists.

    In any case, forced marriage = bad. Not sure there is much else to say about that.

  49. #49
    On March 14th, 2008 at 2:18 pm, Larraby said:

    Harvard’s examination periods for the fall and spring semesters do not fall on any Jewish holidays so there is no policy of allowing Jewish students to take exams at special times. There would be no need to do so. The big Jewish holidays come during three days in September and October when the fall semester is only starting. So Harvard would not have to make any allowances. Since the Jewish sabbath begins on Friday night after sundown and extends through Saturday, Harvard would not have to make special arrangements with religious Jewish students in any case. And since the Christian sabbath is on Sunday when Harvard also does not give exams, Harvard would not have to make any special accomodations there. In any case, allowing a student to take an exam at a special time is often done to accomodate a family emergency,an illness or inclement weather and it .It does not harm anyone. But allowing only women, and preferably women of the Muslim faith, to have exclusive rights to use a university facility, is simply political correctness gone wild. And Harvard would never to this for any other religious faith besides Islam. It is not that Harvard singles out any particular religion for discrimination. It does not. Even someone as critical of Harvard’s liberalism as I am can’t accuse Harvard of that. What Harvard has done is to favor one religion, Islam, over all other religions. Harvard allows one religion to have special privileges.

  50. #50
    On March 14th, 2008 at 2:26 pm, tre said:

    Talk about offending people, y’all need to watch THIS!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qs2Wwv3Vq08

  51. #51
    On March 14th, 2008 at 2:35 pm, trinitytim said:

    Watch this, but don’t be offended, be engraged.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLK1Xpc7SMQ

  52. #52
    On March 14th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On March 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, JHSII said:
    hmmm…normally I am against forced marriage, but if I were to be forced to marry, say, Kim Alexis, I wouldn’t have any problem with it.

    LOL

    Yeah, but she might.

  53. #53
    On March 14th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, bit_boy said:

    Re: Rusty #40, And they don’t offer classes on Sundays to appease their Christian students! Where will it end!?

    Sorry Rusty, it does not end there. Many American corporations grant Saturday and Sunday as days off. Something you may not be aware of.

  54. #54
    On March 14th, 2008 at 4:29 pm, Rusty said:

    See! Christian creep is happening!

    (I guess I should have used the “/sarc” thing with my original comment. I know that those things aren’t really comparable. I don’t think it’s that big of a deal either. Just trying to be sarcastic and funny. My failure is noted.)

  55. #55
    On March 14th, 2008 at 4:32 pm, GaijinBob said:

    Disparage them all you like, but in the end it doesn’t mean anything. They are beating us in all the ways that truly count for the future of humanity. The global caliphate “I”-moeba has a firm hold of the dead culture of Western Europe. The old great cathedrals have already been reduced to mere museum pieces. In another generation, the Caliphate of Europe will have them torn down for being “un-islamic”. And then they’ll turn their attention to us.

  56. #56
    On March 14th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, nyc123me said:

    Here’s a thought.. a conspiracy if you like.. perhaps the US government are doing this (non-action) on purpose, in order to enrage and garner support for the Christians in this country.. once the outrage has reached a high enough and pervasive enough level, the government can act without impunity against other religions trying to railroad our nation and our way of life.. and wow if that’s true, the government must be getting unbelievably frustrated at just how much Americans are willing to bend over and take it, rather than stand up for ourselves!

  57. #57
    On March 14th, 2008 at 4:40 pm, nyc123me said:

    ..with impunity, not without heh..

  58. #58
    On March 14th, 2008 at 6:29 pm, e.koenig said:

    Pathetic.

    Welcome to Eurabia, Britons. Just like in the frog example, by the time you figure out that you’ve irrevocably traded away your freedom for a false sense of comfort and security, it’ll be too late

    one of my favorite quotes seems fitting…

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.

    trying to articulate how i feel and keeping this page family friendly is not an option right now….so happy friday!!

  59. #59
    On March 14th, 2008 at 11:07 pm, garyt said:

    Why do you have to worry about offending Muslims? I thought they were eternally outraged and upset. I have never seen a smiling Muslim except after they celebrate Jews or Christian’s death that they did. Lets go ahead and offend them since they already are offended.

  60. #60
    On March 15th, 2008 at 4:02 am, graysonret said:
  61. #61
    On March 15th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, Thunderbird 1 said:

    I’ll see your “Losing My Religion” lyrics on the Obamessiah post and raise you one Tears for Fears opus (come to think of it, it could apply to the Spitzer mess, too, at times):

    You better love loving you better behave
    You better love loving you better behave
    Woman in Chains
    Woman in Chains

    Calls her man the Great White Hope
    Says she’s fine, she’ll always cope
    Woman in Chains
    Woman in Chains

    Well I feel lying and waiting is a poor man’s deal
    And I feel hopelessly weighed down by your eyes of steel
    [your eyes of steel]
    It’s a world gone crazy
    Keeps Woman in Chains

    Trades her soul as skin and bone
    Sells the only thing she owns

    Woman in Chains
    [The Sun and the Moon]
    Woman in Chains

    Men of Stone Men of Stone

    Well I feel deep in your heart there are wounds Time can’t heal
    And I feel somebody somewhere is trying to breathe
    Well you know what I mean
    It’s a world gone crazy
    Keeps Woman in Chains

    It’s under my skin but out of my hands
    I’ll tear it apart but I won’t understand
    I will not accept the Greatness of Man

    It’s a world gone crazy
    Keeps Woman in Chains
    [gone crazy keeps Woman in Chains]

    So Free Her So Free Her
    So Free Her So Free Her
    So Free Her So Free Her

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Meanwhile, back at the war on terror…

November 3, 2008 03:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Remember the Cole.

The Beirut barracks bombing: 25 years ago today

October 22, 2008 03:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

80 Comments | 18 Trackbacks

Honor the 241.

Taliban assassinate Christian relief worker, world yawns

October 21, 2008 12:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

61 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Apathy.

Remember the Cole: 8 years

October 12, 2008 01:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

59 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Not forgotten.

Mark Steyn acquitted in Canadian sharia case

October 10, 2008 03:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

76 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

“In the matter of the human rights code…”

Badge of honor: “Islamophobia’s Dirty Dozen”

October 9, 2008 06:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

155 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Charter member.

Mall bomb jihadist sentenced to 35 years

September 30, 2008 03:02 PM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Islam


Power Line

» Turkeys on parade

Belmont Club

» 2025