Michelle Malkin » Jeremiah Wright’s Greatest Hits

Jeremiah Wright’s Greatest Hits

By Michelle Malkin • March 17, 2008 08:34 AM

Because Barack Obama asked for it, Jim Hoft delivers (nice album cover, Jim!):

Side One:

- God Damn America
- Hillary Aint No N*gger
- Bill Treated Me Like Monica
- God Damn America (Remix)

Side Two:

- Racism is How this Country was Founded
- Chickens Come Home to Roost
- We’re the Same as Al-Qaeda
- We bombed Nagasaki & Didn’t bat an eye
- God’s Sick of this Sh*t!

Watch Obama lavish praise on his crazy uncle.

Wrong-headed Wright’s church plays martyr. Obama’s playing the card, too. Natch. Race-mongers’ Rule Number One: When exposed, shout “VICTIM” at the top of lungs:

Otis Moss III, the current pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, used his pulpit to defend his congregation and its past minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., from a wave of controversy stemming from inflammatory statements made by Wright.

“We have listened and watched as the wonderful work of our church has been vilified this week,” he told about 3,000 congregants on Palm Sunday morning. “This week should be special for us because I guess we know a little something about crucifixion.”

The church also released a statement that began: “Nearly three weeks before the 40th commemorative anniversary of the murder of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the Reverend Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.’s character is being assassinated in the public sphere because he has preached a social gospel on behalf of oppressed women, children and men in America and around the globe.”

Bill Kristol distills the essence of Obama:

The more you learn about him, the more Obama seems to be a conventionally opportunistic politician, impressively smart and disciplined, who has put together a good political career and a terrific presidential campaign. But there’s not much audacity of hope there. There’s the calculation of ambition, and the construction of artifice, mixed in with a dash of deceit — all covered over with the great conceit that this campaign, and this candidate, are different.

Juan Williams agrees.

More on Obama’s reported attendance at one of Wright’s Hate America sermons from Ronald Kessler. If the report is accurate, Obama needs to be pressed on it.

If it isn’t accurate, Kessler and Newsmax need to correct and retract it.

Scott at Power Line has more:

The Los Angeles Times blog reports the Obama campaign’s denial that Obama attended the July 22 service; it states that Obama was in Miami that day. (Davis’s story was originally posted in August 2007; the Obama campaign apparently did not take notice of it until yesterday.) In fact, according to a Washington Post listing, Obama was scheduled to address the national council of La Raza’s annual conference on July 22, 2007. The time of Obama’s scheduled appearance is listed as “n/a.” Mickey Kaus has posted a La Raza press release listing Obama’s scheduled appearance at 1:30 p.m. There is also video of Obama’s appearance. As Kaus says, the ball is in Kessler’s court.

Allahpundit weighs in.

***

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: « 1 [2]

#101

On March 17th, 2008 at 5:56 pm, BrianNY said:

#97 huggybear said:

I’m not condoning Wright’s remarks. I’m simply saying if you focus only on the negatives, while disregarding any positives - contrary to your treatment of Romney and the Mormon church - you’re not playing fair.

At this point, you seem to be implying that the only fair way that conservatives can feel outrage at the, until now, non-coverage of the Obama/Wright relationship…is to condemn “past policy” belonging to the religious institution that Mitt Romney subscribes to?

Wasn’t Romney’s faith fully vetted during his campaign, to the point that he gave a speech addressing where he stood in full?

By your logic, we might also take a moment to condemn your relationship with a government institution which once condoned slavery. In fact, I’m sure Obama’s pastor would love it if we did. It would take the spotlight off his overt racism, while fitting right in with his idea of “black liberation theology.”
#102

On March 17th, 2008 at 8:12 pm, huggybear said:

No - by my logic, all of this is a really pathetic and tiresome diversion.

If people are going to trash Obama — or any of the candidates, for that matter — I would prefer they do it via the candidates’ own policy stances, and for things the candidates themselves say, rather than what someone in their church says. That is ultimately what matters most to me when I vote.

I don’t care about the Romney’s relationship to the Church of LDS, I don’t care about the Church of LDS’ past policy on race relations, and I don’t care about Obama’s ties to a pastor who said — in Obama’s own words today — some very stupid things.

I fail to see how quibbling over whether or not Obama was in church on such-and-such date should is important. But I’m also not the one who keeps bringing it up. Since you all did, I’m simply turning the tables and reframing the question around someone from “your team.”

As for Imus, he worked [works? I think he's back on air now] for a for-profit organization who is at least somewhat accountable to their viewership, and certainly to their advertizers. And if they call for Imus’ head, well, that’s how the free market works.
#103

On March 17th, 2008 at 9:41 pm, huggybear said:

One last thought, with [hopefully] a little more clarity….

Up until just a couple decades ago [when Romney was an adult, capable of deciding his faith for himself] the Mormon Church had a very well-known policy in favor of racial segregation. There may not be a cache of you tube clips available to conjure up a montage of juicy soundbites, but considering this was a matter of formal policy, you simply cannot argue Romney was unaware of it. Whether or not it was a cause for personal conflict for him, I do not know; but I do know he stuck with his faith despite its bigoted policy.

I’m not very familiar with the Mormon church, but as some have noted above, they do some good things, and I have no reason to dispute that. And I do NOT believe that, even despite carrying an embarrassingly out-moded stance on racial integration well into the late 20th century, every single member of the church should be held accountable for those beliefs. It’s a matter of weighing the good vs. the bad, and for many, the good wins. I can respect that of Romney, just as I respect that of Obama. I just wish you all could do the same.
#104

On March 17th, 2008 at 9:43 pm, JWS said:

Huggy-dog,

Are you saying that if a White candidate actively associated with a White racist/ separatist “church” for 20 years, and took his spiritual/ life advice, and inspiration, from a KKK-like pastor for over 20 years who presided over his wedding and baptized his shorties, and said things like 9/11 was payback, etc, etc, blablabla, you would not see this as indicative of a seriously flawed and racist mind?

Guilt by association means a one time meeting or an endorsement not sought, etc. Obama and his wife are racist to their core.
#105

On March 17th, 2008 at 11:21 pm, HarryStar said:

huggybear #102

I actually do believe that Mitt Romney’s link to LDS was something to be looked into. As JWS said prior, if he was friends with somebody in the KKK who he took advice from, etc., I do think it’s an issue (for both Romney and Obama).

Character was one of the major items that the Founding Fathers wanted in a President.

I DO NOT care if he was/wasn’t in church on such & such a date. Frankly, people are just looking for that Ken Starr gotcha moment.

You mentioned Don Imus.

Let me provide you with this one; Trent Lott who said, “When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over the years, either”

How many speeches and discussions in his Senate life has Trent Lott given. For the statement above, he had to step down from his leadership position?

Yes, just so you know, when Senator Dodd said his remarks for Robert Byrd, a former KKK member, I didn’t take his remarks to be racist as well.

The final test for all should be the following, it’s really quite easy.

Replace the word Black with White and see what would happen.
#106

On March 18th, 2008 at 4:08 am, HarryStar said:

Funny thing. I was thinking of the irony here. What should a peace loving sermon from a pastor vs. a true “Uniter” from a Marine.

Thanks for reminding Michelle of the America that I WANT to live in.

Remember this?
#107

On March 18th, 2008 at 7:39 am, hayroller15 said:

huggybear, Oprah is a racist. Look up some of her comments from her shows on satelite radio.
#108

On March 18th, 2008 at 8:42 am, governmentdrone said:

huggybear:

Here’s the flaw in your logic. The LDS church had a policy (doctrine?)that was exclusionary to blacks. Being a member of the LDS church, Romney couldn’t simply go to another LDS church to escape this church policy - it would be the same no matter which LDS church he chose to attend. Plus if memory serves me correctly, the LDS policy wasn’t that blacks couldn’t join the church, it was that they couldn’t be members of the church heirarchy. (Someone who might have better knowledge of the situation, please correct me if I’m wrong about this.)

Obama could EASILY choose another church to attend - one that not only has a pastor who doesn’t spew the racist crap that Rev. Wright does, but one that is inclusive of all races. I’m betting the Rev. Wright’s church doesn’t have ANY white people in it’s heirarchy (like the LDS church does now).

Care to take that bet, huggy?

Point being, Obama could easily choose a different congregation to belong to and not have to change his Christian faith. For Romney to do that, he would have had to change his faith entirely.

Big difference.
#109

On March 18th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, BrianNY said:

audacity: the bold or arrogant disregard of normal restraints
#110

On March 18th, 2008 at 2:40 pm, dean_acheson said:

So, for the big win, can anyone identify the shirt that the fabulous pastor is wearing?

I can see “africa” and 1590.

I’m sure that would be enlightning.
#111

On March 19th, 2008 at 6:23 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

Mr. Wright looks like he’s got more than just African blood in him. But I guess like Obama and all the other self-hating liberals, he’s ashamed of it.