About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Nickelodeon is at it again

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 17, 2008 02:39 PM

ellerbee.jpg

Left-winger Linda Ellerbee is having a field day at children’s network Nickelodeon. First, anti-war propaganda. (More here.) And now, open-borders propaganda (via Lonewacko):

I’M AMERICAN! THEY’RE NOT! Sunday at 9 p.m. Nickelodeon.

Paola is 13. Her sister, Vanessa, is 14. Their brother, Nahum, is 17. They live in a comfortable house in Roswell, N.M.

One morning, they heard a commotion downstairs and found agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) putting their father in handcuffs - the first step toward deporting both parents to their native Mexico.

This story is one of several Linda Ellerbee uses Sunday night in a “Nick News” special to illuminate a troubling consequence of our ongoing response to the complex issue of immigration.

Anyone born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen, even if his or her parents are not. So if a family stays after a child is born, it’s possible the parents could be subject to deportation while the child is not.

An estimated 3 million children are now in that situation. Any morning, they could wake up to hear their parents being deported.

And then what do they do?

Ellerbee claims she’s not taking sides:

Ellerbee starts the show by stressing that she’s not taking sides in the larger immigration debate, just reminding us of its impact on children.

She visits three families - two where the parents were deported, one where the parents are still here and the children do their homework by flashlight to minimize any attention they might attract.

If she really weren’t taking sides, we’d see a fair and balanced look at families and children whose lives have been torn apart by the bloody consequences of lax immigration enforcement.

Maybe Ellerbee would like to illuminate Nickelodeon’s audience about the Cottonwood school bus tragedy, for example.

Posted in: Open Borders Lobby

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Continuing Moonbattery of Nickelodeon : The American Pundit
  2. Neocon News » Leftists pray for occupation of America (15% more nutter butter)
  3. How to Piss Me Off--Army of Dog
  4. Moonbattery

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On March 17th, 2008 at 2:40 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    Nickelodeon=Crap

  2. #2
    On March 17th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, Barry F. said:

    I agree with PBoilermaker. Nickelodeon is pretty much synonymous with “crap”. :roll:

  3. #3
    On March 17th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, Archon said:

    As if I needed another reason not to have cable TV in my home.

  4. #4
    On March 17th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, trailortrash said:

    another example of why i stopped letting my children watch this channel quit awhile ago.

  5. #5
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:01 pm, Pulchritudinous Patriot said:

    I don’t allow my children to watch this channel. I even have it blocked.

  6. #6
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 2:40 pm, PBoilermaker said:
    Nickelodeon=Crap

    Television=crap

  7. #7
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, dankitti said:

    I like Nickelodeon if it’s Spongebob Squarepants. Anyway, Michelle, I saw that in the tv listings and I thought of you. Erm yeah, Ellerbee’s at it again. bleh. :P

  8. #8
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:
    Television=crap

    Affirmative.

  9. #9
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, mnmike said:

    that’s why I hate Nick and all its cretins.

  10. #10
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    If your children ask why, simply tell them that these kids’ parents broke the law.

    Ask them if we should not take action against those who break the law.

    Ask them then, why do we make these people’s children legal citizens?

    The answer to both you and your children should now become crystal clear.

  11. #11
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    I remember when Nickelodeon was good. Now it’s just propoganda.

    Another one for me to block. Pretty soon, it won’t pay to have cable…

  12. #12
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:07 pm, mngirl said:

    Hhhmm….wonder if Ellerbee can draw this correlation; AZ and NM are in the top 5 in the ranking of “Most Dangerous States to live in” - http://money.aol.com/mortgage/most-dangerous-states

    Go to the top 15 and you can add the other two mexican border states of TX and CA.

  13. #13
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, j0 said:

    I use to love Nickelodeon back in the 80’s early 90’s, they had some good shows.

    Most of you are right, TV in general is pure crap now anyway.

  14. #14
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    They’re still on the air?

  15. #15
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, spidgy said:

    Great. Now I have to keep an eye what my daughter watches on “kids’” channels. Thanks, Nick.

  16. #16
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, Chuck said:

    Illegal citizens.

    Due to a bad (and false) interpretation of the 14th amendment, any brat born on American soil magically becomes and American citizen. No other nation in the civilized world does that. So… send these illegal citizens back to whatever crappy third world country they invaded us from along with their criminal invader parents and start applying the Constitution correctly. Problem solved.

  17. #17
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:32 pm, RaisedRight said:

    What are Ellerbee’s credentials anyway? I think I was about 10 when Nick News started and I remember thinking it was not quite right when I was in my early teens. They did a special when I was 12 or so about global warming and its effects on kids and I know I turned it off (although is was probably not because I was an exceptionally socially aware child but rather because I was bored… and I never liked Ellerbee’s voice.)

    Is this the same wonderful network that has the unwed, pregnant, 16-year-old Spears as a star… or does Disney get to claim that honor?

  18. #18
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:42 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    RaisedRight #17
    Ellerbee has been around a long time. She has been a reporter on various news magazine shows like 20/20 and is supposed to have some sort of journalistic training. Well if you consider shows like 20/20 journalistic that is.

  19. #19
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    There is a 3 choice option for families that fall into this category that should be put into law.
    1) You can choose to have your deported with you. They will be entered into a database and upon reaching their 18th birthday they can come back provided you haven’t already been granted some sort of residenncy or citizenship prior to that
    2) You may leave the children with relatives who are in this country legally until such time as you achieve the legal requirements to reenter this country
    3) You give the children to childrens’ services

    In all cases the adults are going to leave, period. Let them make the choice what they want to do with the children.

  20. #20
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Yiddish Steel said:

    Just because a child is born here in the USA, brought into this world by their Illegal Alien parents doesn’t mean that said child can’t return to the parent’s country of origin with those parents and be raised there until they are an adult, where they can choose weather or not to return here, legally.

  21. #21
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:49 pm, dankitti said:

    What are Ellerbee’s credentials anyway?

    I think she started out on a show called 30 Minutes, a CBS News spinoff of 60 Minutes — for kids. I am NOT sure because every time I try to look up information for Linda Ellerbee, i keep getting redirected to the Kool-Aid home page.

  22. #22
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:49 pm, dm60462 said:

    Same here. Blocked the channel. Nickelodeon used to be a wonderful product. We even took the family to the studios in Florida long long ago. Now it’s a repository for sluts and commies.

    We need a Photoshop competition for a new Nick slogan and logo. Anybody game?

  23. #23
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, tarpon said:

    I block this channel. The new TVs are great.

  24. #24
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, terrig said:

    We don’t watch Nick anyway but I went ahead and blocked it.
    I’m sorry that their folks broke the law but when you break the law, you gotta pay. If I were to rob a bank, I’d expect to go to jail for a very long time. These people break the law by coming here, (yes, I know little liberals-they’re all good people just trying to make a living), they make sure they have babies once they get here and then they and their anchors help themselves to the bounty of the American Handout System known as welfare. Anchors Away!

  25. #25
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:58 pm, zorro said:

    Maybe Ellerbee would like to illuminate Nickelodeon’s audience about the Cottonwood school bus tragedy, for example.

    That would be too much like real journalism.

  26. #26
    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:58 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Is this the same wonderful network that has the unwed, pregnant, 16-year-old Spears as a star… or does Disney get to claim that honor?

    Disney, I believe.

    It is a sad state of affairs. If there weren’t a handful of shows I really liked, I’d chuck the television all together.

    Might just do that, anyway. At least that’s the direction I’m heading.

  27. #27
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Echostar at 61.5° is going down. That means no more skyangel and no more TV for the Soap residence.

    I can’t say I will miss it.

    My daughter HAS to watch Nick. She works at a daycare. She says even SpongeBob is loaded with sexual references. She says the kids do not understand but adults would. Get them early, get them often.

  28. #28
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, RaisedRight said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:58 pm, englishqueen01 said:
    It is a sad state of affairs. If there weren’t a handful of shows I really liked, I’d chuck the television all together.

    That’s the way I feel. My husband and I watch a few primetime shows like Heroes and Pushing Daisies and The Office, but I often feel like I am so disgusted with the lineup of a network like ABC that it ruins my enjoyment of the one show I watch there. So far our family is just us, but when we have kids I know that there will be channels blocked if we still have cable at all.

  29. #29
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:06 pm, rpg1616 said:

    “And then what do they do?” Um . . go back to Mexico with their parents. Just because they are ALLOWED to stay here doesn’t mean they HAVE TO stay here.

  30. #30
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:15 pm, Mookie said:

    Disc jockey at WSOM Chicago, 1964-65; program director, KSJO San Francisco, 1967-68; reporter, KJNO Juneau, Alaska, 1969-72; news writer, Associated Press in Dallas, 1972; television reporter, KHOU in Houston, Texas, 1972-73; general assignment reporter, WCBS-TV in New York City, 1973-76; reporter, the Washington bureau of NBC News, 1976-78; co-anchor, network news magazine Weekend, 1978-79; correspondent, NBC Nightly News, 1979-82; co-anchor, NBC News Overnight, 1982-84; co-anchor, Summer Sunday, 1984; reporter, Today, 1984-86; reporter, Good Morning America, 1986; anchor, ABC show Our World, 1986-87; commentator, CNN, 1989; president, Lucky Duck Productions, since 1987; producer, writer, and host, Nick News since 1993; writer, host, On the Record, on-line production with Microsoft, since 1996. Recipient: Peabody Award, 1991.

  31. #31
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:23 pm, TMoney said:

    If I had kids, I might have a TV just to teach them how to do without it. If I had a TV, I still won’t watch twits like this. She’s part of the problem that we can’t get out borders secured - whi-i-i-n-ne!

  32. #32
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, The Raging Republican said:

    Nickelodeon AL Jazeera is at it again

    There, I fixed it for ya.

  33. #33
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, J S Ragman said:

    Anyone born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen, even if his or her parents are not. So if a family stays after a child is born, it’s possible the parents could be subject to deportation while the child is not.

    An estimated 3 million children are now in that situation. Any morning, they could wake up to hear their parents being deported.

    I thank my God every day that I was born an American citizen. I also thank Him for my wife, who is naturalized, and for our 4-year-old daughter, who was also born here.

    Should things have been different, and for some reason, my family and I would not be able to stay in this country, I would not want to be the one to stand between my wife, and our daughter, and tell them they had to be separated.

    Those illegal aliens who have kids here, hoping to use them as an anchor, have no family values, no respect for their culture (take the kids back to Mexico and let them learn about their heritage first hand), and no respect for our laws.

    To then play the “we’re just hardworking people, trying to do the best for our families” card makes me want to hurl.

  34. #34
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, JohnHolliday said:

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

    The above is from the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. It does NOT say that everyone born in this country is a citizen. Notice the qualification. You must also be “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Please explain to me how the child of an illegal alien is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States? It is not since its parents broke international law to get here. International law gives every country the right and power to guard its borders and limit entry.

    It is the height of conceit to believe that our laws apply to foreign nationals. I’m sure that, say, Brazil would be more than happy to cede its jurisdiction over its citizens to the jurisdiction of the United States. NOT! Don’t forget that when a foreign diplomat or the diplomat’s wife gives birth, the child is NOT a citizen of the U.S. And they are in this country legally! Their children are not born in the embassy which is theoretically part of the home country. The mother is taken to a local hospital to ensure her safety. I am so tired of this “anchor baby” BS.

    The original intent of this clause was to force Democrat controlled state legislatures to recognize former slaves as citizens. Nothing more. Remember, every Republican voted for the 14th and 15th Amendments and every Democrat voted against them.

    The children in this story are NOT citizens. Ship them home with their illegal parents!

  35. #35
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, right_on said:

    Ellerbee starts the show by stressing that she’s not taking sides in the larger immigration debate, just reminding us of its impact on children.

    How about the impact her bullsnot is having on actual American children…you know, those little sponges that absorb everything when they’re young? How about transmitting POSITIVE messages about America, and it’s citizens…the MOST charitable people on planet Earth?

  36. #36
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:51 pm, emjem24 said:

    Nickelodeon= irresponsible media liberals at their worst. Nothing to see here, kiddies…. now go watch Disney! :)

  37. #37
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:54 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Yo emjem,

    Is Disney any better? Have not watched in years.

  38. #38
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:57 pm, Alphonse said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, Chuck said:

    Illegal citizens.

    Due to a bad (and false) interpretation of the 14th amendment, any brat born on American soil magically becomes and American citizen.

    Amen, brother! I’ve been thinking of reviewing my How to Be Your Own Lawyer in Court manual and filing for an injunction in federal court against the unsavory practice of giving citizenship to jackpot babies.

    The notion that the authors of the 14th meant to reward the sneaky parents of jackpot babies for infiltrating our country is totally absurd. I’m sure they never dreamed we’d have a president and coyote-in-chief so corrupt and unpatriotic that he would encourage illegal entry to reward cronies of the business world with cheap labor, and a Democratic party so corrupt they would use the jackpot baby program to breed Democratic voters. Yuck, what garbage we have in Washington.

  39. #39
    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, Thomas said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, right_on said: How about transmitting POSITIVE messages about America, and it’s citizens…the MOST charitable people on planet Earth?

    Nah Nah Nah! It’s “God Damned America!!!

    You should know better than that. Most charitable? All the rich white people? I think not. It’s only the last few months that any of us should actually be proud of our country.
    (Sarcasm & Quoting Obama’s minister and wife, of course.)

  40. #40
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:00 pm, Thomas said:

    I think it’s “Anchor babies,” Alphonse.
    (”jackpot babies” is a new one for me.)

  41. #41
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:00 pm, graysonret said:

    If you really want to get technical over the 14th amendment, JohnH, the whole thing, in reality, didn’t win even a majority vote in the Senate. As far as state ratification went, it was a disaster. 3 northern states recinded their ratification, and all southern states, except Tennessee under threat, refused to ratify. It was only when Congress in March, 1867, used the Reconstruction Act to extort ratification, was it finally okayed. By that it said that states couldn’t be “admitted” back into the Union, unless they ratified the amendment. Yet, what a minute! This is the same Congress who insisted that the southern states were not legally separated from the Union in the first place, and the SCOTUS agreed (Prize cases 1862). 2 states,West Virginia and Nevada, were constitutionally illegal states anyway. It was a very confusing situation and, due to the war, the Constitution was ignored or twisted to fit the situation at hand. A good Constitution lawyer could have a “lot of fun” suing the U.S. over it.

  42. #42
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:02 pm, Chief RZ said:

    Time for us to have the power to choose our channels and pay for just what we want, not pay for this propaganda. AT&T is very close to offering TV in our area.

  43. #43
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:04 pm, emjem24 said:

    Hey Soap:

    They own ABC and I rarely (if ever) watch that channel. Disney has its own retread kid channel- The Disney Channel and Hannah Montana is on that one. It’s more like Disney Propaganda 24/7.

    I would say that no, Disney is really no different. The way they’ve “sexed up” ABC turning it into the “single chick network” is a good example of what to expect with Disney. Gee, for the days when Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty were seemingly innocent tales of empowerment for women. /sigh

  44. #44
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:15 pm, CO of Fort Housewife said:

    One word~ VeggieTales. And not the sanitized NBC episodes either, where they had to cut out the Bible verse at the end of the show. That is all my toddler will watch/is allowed to watch. And when her baby brother or sister is born and becomes a toddler, that’s all he or she will watch too.

    P.S. Happy Saint Patrick’s Day to those who celebrate today! I didn’t get the memo.

  45. #45
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, Roman Con said:

    Another great way to teach your children about the liberal media - without letting them watch that drivel, of course.

    “Yes Virginia, there is an ICE. And occasionally they show up to enforce the law. What’s that sweetie? Oh, you are right - ICE shows up just about as often as Santa and the Easter Bunny.”

  46. #46
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, RobM1981 said:

    Does Linda mention what happens to the kids whose dads couldn’t keep their business open since Paola, Vanessa, and Nahum’s father didn’t pay for insurance and other such things?

    No?

    Really?

    Sure glad she’s not taking sides.

  47. #47
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:20 pm, Nicki said:

    This is one of the 8,000 reasons I do not let my child watch Nickelodeon anymore.

  48. #48
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:22 pm, foxforce91 said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 3:58 pm, englishqueen01 said:
    Is this the same wonderful network that has the unwed, pregnant, 16-year-old Spears as a star… or does Disney get to claim that honor?
    Disney, I believe.

    No that is Zoey 101 and it is Nickelodeon.

  49. #49
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, John Ansell said:

    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:02 pm, Chief RZ said:

    I’m with you. I pretty much watch the Fox News station until “On The Milk Cartoon with Greta” comes on. I like her but can’t stand the content of her shows. Aruba Aruba Aruba, Anna Anna Anna, and it’s all speculating news and not breaking news, as they call it.

    It’s like the cable company has me paited into a corner, I got to by a highere package in order to get Fox. And here in So. Cal, it appears the majority of the channels are in Espanol anyway.

  50. #50
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    She had a pro gay-rights show about 5-6 years ago. the premise was harrassment of the children of same-sex couples. There were about 12-15 kids and 4 adults.
    Three of the kids said their religion (Christian, Muslim, & not sure) spoke against homosexuality, but that neither the parents nor their kids should be harrassed. All of the other kids had same-sex paents. One of the adults and several of the other kids said they wished the other three were more “open-minded” (The liberal definition of close-minded is to believe something other than the same thing the liberal believes.)
    Two of the adults were identified or identified themselves as being gay the first time they spoke. The remaining adult (besides Ellerbee) who was a school principal was not identified as gay until nearly the end. So other than Ellerbee, all of the adults were gay. No adult spoke from the position of the religious children.
    Jerry Falwell had provided a short monologue, but had tried to get it removed before the program aired becuase IIRC he claimed they had misrepresented themselves beforehand. A GLADD spokeswoman spoke right after Falwell and refuted what he said. Falwell was not allowed to follow-up.
    The main source of information for the program was GLADD.
    The program was promoted in the print, online, & on-screen TV guide as simply “News”. The morning before it was air I posted a message on the Nickelodeon website simply asking if anyone had heard that such a show was to be aired. A couple hours later I checked back and my message had been deleted.

    A pro-gay agenda program was slipped in front of very young kids, with no notice to the parents who might have objected. In fact they made every effort to hide it from the parents ahead of time.

  51. #51
    On March 17th, 2008 at 5:58 pm, RedRepub said:

    Linda Ellerbee should stick to hocking Maxwell House coffee.
    Anyone remember those commercials? They looked like regular newscasts. Linda reported :

    “Today’s top story- more people prefer the taste of Maxwell House coffee. ‘It tastes rich’ they say.”

    These were real commercials. I’m not making this up.

  52. #52
    On March 17th, 2008 at 6:03 pm, bentman78 said:

    I would normally be skeptical of saying a TV station leans one way because of a political agenda. They are in it to make money not be politicians, but in the case of Nickelodeon which is owned by Viacom, we see a big disparity in contributions. According to the latest statistics at Opensecrets, 99% of their donations went to the Democrats. With the only contributions to the GOP coming from Viacom itself and Blockbuster, the rest of their subsidiaries went right to the Dems with the biggest donations coming from BET and Kingsworld productions. I’d say this is a good case for pushing an agenda…

  53. #53
    On March 17th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, Thunderbird 1 said:

    Ellerbee starts the show by stressing that she’s not taking sides

    That’s a good one. Linda’s only 14 days early for April Fool’s Day.

  54. #54
    On March 17th, 2008 at 6:55 pm, John Ansell said:

    LOL thunderbird #53. Isn’t it April’s fools day everyday for these nuts?

  55. #55
    On March 17th, 2008 at 7:19 pm, CC said:

    I just blocked it. My granddaughters have plenty of other channels to choose from.

  56. #56
    On March 17th, 2008 at 7:31 pm, alilianstrom said:

    I’m so glad my kids outgrew Nickelodeon. In the beginning it was fun but crap like this lost it for me.

  57. #57
    On March 17th, 2008 at 7:33 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Don’t watch=don’t complain. Just ignore it.

  58. #58
    On March 17th, 2008 at 7:48 pm, greenfairie said:

    How about featuring the children of people murdered by coyotes and violent criminals who made it across the border? I guess it’s too much to ask.

  59. #59
    On March 17th, 2008 at 8:56 pm, Dimsdale said:

    This is precisely how dictators, fascists and opressive regimes stay in power: indoctrinate the children. Look at Castro, Hitler, Chavez, Dear Leader, etc.

    Why do you think that the liberals infest higher education? Education as a whole? (Hint: it is not only because they can’t cut it in the real world).

    Now they are working their way into our children’s minds via formerly innocent children’s television shows. They have been doing with cartoons for years.

    The only way to counter this is to watch it with your child, and then explain to them the errors and fabrications. It won’t be long before they can do it themselves and your job is done.

  60. #60
    On March 17th, 2008 at 9:43 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Well, I don’t agree with breaking up families for immigration reasons, but I’m tired of the one-sided view of Nick and this woman.

  61. #61
    On March 17th, 2008 at 11:28 pm, DaveC said:

    isn’t that like a left winger moonbat… planting herself to brainwash little kiddies..

    I can see why people use a DVD player.. for content control..

  62. #62
    On March 17th, 2008 at 11:41 pm, mattymatt10 said:

    Am I really the first person to point out they’re staging a show about illegal “aliens” in Roswell, NM? HA! That’s awesome.

    They could add in a conspiracy theory part about other “aliens” in Roswell that the gov’t is covering up. Kill two birds with one stone. *nyuk nyuk nyuk*

  63. #63
    On March 18th, 2008 at 5:36 am, jbirish said:

    This channel has been blocked from my grandkids access for over two years. As soon as they started their parent bashing, that was the end of the ‘kiddie propaganda’ watching.

  64. #64
    On March 18th, 2008 at 10:07 am, eforhan said:

    So, the parents come to the USA to have anchor babies and it’s the USA’s fault if the families get broken-up?

    Madness.

  65. #65
    On March 18th, 2008 at 10:13 am, Laree said:

    Do these networks understand they are running a business for ratings? It looks like now I have to block Nickelodean? They are suppose to entertain children not indoctornate children.

  66. #66
    On March 18th, 2008 at 10:48 am, bolivar said:

    I remember the good old days when Nick had shows like Ren and Stimpy and I even enjoyed it!! Now they read like the alphabet networks and that is a real crime. Ellerbee is worn out and should have been out to pasture long ago. Her tired old “not taking sides” while presenting things just like she wants them to be perceived is only the latest example. And to think, at one time I liked her and even agreed with her - guess I grew up and she didn’t?

  67. #67
    On March 18th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, GaijinBob said:

    JohnHolliday said:

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

    The above is from the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. It does NOT say that everyone born in this country is a citizen. Notice the qualification. You must also be “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Please explain to me how the child of an illegal alien is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?

    Basically you are subject to the jurisdiction if you are subject to the laws of the U.S. That means that if you are a diplomat with certain diplomatic immunity, then you are not subject to our laws and jurisdiction. If you have diplomatic immunity and commit a crime, the most the U.S. gov’t can do is expel you. And any children born to you while you are residing here are therefore not citizens. But if an illegal immigrant commits a crime, we can throw them in jail and prosecute them in accordance with our laws. Since that makes them subject to our jurisdiction, their offspring would qualify under the 14th Amendment to be citizens.

  68. #68
    On March 18th, 2008 at 7:42 pm, SAHMmy said:

    I’m a conservative but man, you guys are extreme! Block the channel that gave us Ren and Stimpy, Invader Zim and Spongebob Squarepants?! You have to be kidding!! Just because of that stupid, insipid Nick News show? Hell to the no!

    I sit there and I explain to my kids where the truth ends and propaganda begins, so that when they encounter all the other kids who are being indoctrinated by that show, they’ll be armed with the facts and can enlighten their classmates.

    We have to arm our children with knowledge, and that doesn’t mean shield them from the lies. We have to SHOW them the lies and identify them as such. We are the parents.

    Besides it’s gleeful fun.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

It’s not just ACORN: La Raza partner caught red-handed

October 9, 2008 09:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Yes, they can.

Not all is well in GOP land

September 3, 2008 01:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Curb your enthusiasm.

Update: Judge says English-only is not “hostile”

August 16, 2008 08:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Speak the language.

Your NEA cultural tax dollars at work

August 12, 2008 05:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 1 Trackback

National Endowment for (other countries’) Arts.

Illegal alien Death Row rapist/killer’s last-ditch appeal

August 4, 2008 11:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

212 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

“Go to hell.”

How we know immigration enforcement is working–part II

August 1, 2008 09:45 AM by see-dubya

30 Comments | 1 Trackback

More catch, less release.

How we know immigration enforcement is working–Part I

August 1, 2008 12:20 AM by see-dubya

63 Comments | 1 Trackback

Squeals and groans.


Categories: Open Borders Lobby


Belmont Club

» 2025