See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Blog Jocky » Blog Archive » Blogging while female, part II

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #269211
   On March 19th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, AlohaGuy said:

   it takes a certain kind of woman who can put up with the sort of stuff that Michelle Malkin does….

   Heh…

2. #269214
   On March 19th, 2008 at 3:26 pm, KaosKlerik said:

   A bunch of uppity women thinking they can blog on a mans internet. Who do they think they are? What makes them… huh?

   What?

   MICHELLE Malkin?!

   Oh…
   Uh…
   Nevermind.

   

3. #269217
   On March 19th, 2008 at 3:30 pm, The Raging Republican said:

   She is fierce!

4. #269221
   On March 19th, 2008 at 3:36 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

   Interesting

5. #269227
   On March 19th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

   You know, why is gender an issue…unless it’s about self-promotion? If writing is good it should stand on its own irrespective whether is was written by a guy or gal…..really!

6. #269284
   On March 19th, 2008 at 4:37 pm, almeehan said:

   Keep up the great work!

7. #269286
   On March 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, almeehan said:

   Also tell AP not to look at MKH’s picture too much.

8. #269368
   On March 19th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, Schweggie said:

   Hooooray women bloggers!

   Best single picture of MKH I ever did see. Wowsers. That smile alone is a homewrecker.
   Also be sure to catch Hawkins’s Drudgy, Hot Air-ish Conservative Grapevine, if you haven’t already.

9. #269417
   On March 19th, 2008 at 6:37 pm, ThackerAgency said:

   And too, I might not mention my sordid interpretation of the ‘Luce Lady’ ad on your blog if you were a man. It gives creeps like me the wrong ideas.

   I think women use their looks to get some gigs, but who cares? I like it even though it might subject the ladies to more difficult scrutiny than men.

10. #269448
    On March 19th, 2008 at 7:26 pm, zorro said:

    I say three cheers for all the “intrepid” female conservative bloggers! Congratulations to all and thank you for all the good work.

11. #269489
    On March 19th, 2008 at 9:59 pm, shooter said:

    Ditto , Zorro. ( heh, kinda…rhythmic)
    .
    Thx for the list MM. I will check ‘em out, altho there is but one Firecracker.

12. #269510
    On March 19th, 2008 at 11:38 pm, Debbie Schlussel said:

    Sadly, not all of these women are “intrepid”. One of them, Emily Zanotti, admitted that she deliberately made up false, defamatory information about me. She only apologized when she knew I would certainly win a lawsuit against her. Then, she posted support for a Muslim Holocaust-denial death threat against me and my family. Sad, Michelle, that you would help John Hawkins promote this disgusting, vile type of “blogging.” Nothing intrepid about it. It’s simply deranged. Michelle, you have been upset when others posted false info about–and even photoshopped photos–of you. Why would you promote it when a “conservative” blogger does it?

13. #269603
    On March 20th, 2008 at 9:19 am, Barry F. said:

    That’s quite a list of impressive bloggers. I read several of them from time to time. I can’t say that I am a fan of all of them but several of them do extraordinary work.

    But, you are still my favorite, Michelle. As shooter noted, “there is but one Firecracker.”

14. #269893
    On March 20th, 2008 at 2:39 pm, DBNinKY said:

    MK Ham is great, but I would hardly call her “humble.” As well researched and systemically detailed as her articles are, I think brilliantly pragmatic or thoughtfully provoking are far apt adjectives to summarize her skills.

15. #269918
    On March 20th, 2008 at 3:40 pm, DaveC said:

    MKH…

    *stares dreamingly out into space…**