<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging while female, part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269918</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269918</guid>
		<description>MKH...


&lt;em&gt;*stares dreamingly out into space...**&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MKH&#8230;</p>
<p><em>*stares dreamingly out into space&#8230;**</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBNinKY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269893</link>
		<dc:creator>DBNinKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269893</guid>
		<description>MK Ham is great, but I would hardly call her &quot;humble.&quot; As well researched and systemically detailed as her articles are, I think &lt;em&gt;brilliantly pragmatic&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;thoughtfully provoking&lt;/em&gt; are far apt adjectives to summarize her skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK Ham is great, but I would hardly call her &#8220;humble.&#8221; As well researched and systemically detailed as her articles are, I think <em>brilliantly pragmatic</em> or <em>thoughtfully provoking</em> are far apt adjectives to summarize her skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry F.</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269603</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269603</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s quite a list of impressive bloggers.  I read several of them from time to time.  I can&#039;t say that I am a fan of all of them but several of them do extraordinary work.

But, you are still my favorite, Michelle.  As shooter noted, &quot;there is but one &lt;em&gt;Firecracker&lt;/em&gt;.&quot;  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s quite a list of impressive bloggers.  I read several of them from time to time.  I can&#8217;t say that I am a fan of all of them but several of them do extraordinary work.</p>
<p>But, you are still my favorite, Michelle.  As shooter noted, &#8220;there is but one <em>Firecracker</em>.&#8221;  <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Jocky &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogging while female, part II</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269530</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Jocky &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogging while female, part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269530</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Smallberg wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptJohn Hawkins introduces you to more intrepid female conservative bloggers who should be on your daily reading lists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Smallberg wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptJohn Hawkins introduces you to more intrepid female conservative bloggers who should be on your daily reading lists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Schlussel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269510</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Schlussel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269510</guid>
		<description>Sadly, not all of these women are &quot;intrepid&quot;. One of them, Emily Zanotti, admitted that she deliberately made up false, defamatory information about me.  She only apologized when she knew I would certainly win a lawsuit against her.  Then, she posted support for a Muslim Holocaust-denial death threat against me and my family.  Sad, Michelle, that you would help John Hawkins promote this disgusting, vile type of &quot;blogging.&quot;  Nothing intrepid about it.  It&#039;s simply deranged.  Michelle, you have been upset when others posted false info about--and even photoshopped photos--of you.  Why would you promote it when a &quot;conservative&quot; blogger does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, not all of these women are &#8220;intrepid&#8221;. One of them, Emily Zanotti, admitted that she deliberately made up false, defamatory information about me.  She only apologized when she knew I would certainly win a lawsuit against her.  Then, she posted support for a Muslim Holocaust-denial death threat against me and my family.  Sad, Michelle, that you would help John Hawkins promote this disgusting, vile type of &#8220;blogging.&#8221;  Nothing intrepid about it.  It&#8217;s simply deranged.  Michelle, you have been upset when others posted false info about&#8211;and even photoshopped photos&#8211;of you.  Why would you promote it when a &#8220;conservative&#8221; blogger does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269489</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269489</guid>
		<description>Ditto , Zorro. ( heh, kinda...rhythmic)
.
Thx for the list MM. I will check &#039;em out, altho there is but one &lt;em&gt;Firecracker&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto , Zorro. ( heh, kinda&#8230;rhythmic)<br />
.<br />
Thx for the list MM. I will check &#8216;em out, altho there is but one <em>Firecracker</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorro</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269448</link>
		<dc:creator>zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269448</guid>
		<description>I say three cheers for all the &quot;intrepid&quot; female conservative bloggers!  Congratulations to all and thank you for all the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say three cheers for all the &#8220;intrepid&#8221; female conservative bloggers!  Congratulations to all and thank you for all the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269417</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269417</guid>
		<description>And too, I might not mention my sordid  interpretation of the &#039;Luce Lady&#039; ad on your blog if you were a man.  It gives creeps like me the wrong ideas.

I think women use their looks to get some gigs, but who cares?  I like it even though it might subject the ladies to more difficult scrutiny than men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And too, I might not mention my sordid  interpretation of the &#8216;Luce Lady&#8217; ad on your blog if you were a man.  It gives creeps like me the wrong ideas.</p>
<p>I think women use their looks to get some gigs, but who cares?  I like it even though it might subject the ladies to more difficult scrutiny than men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schweggie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269368</link>
		<dc:creator>Schweggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269368</guid>
		<description>Hooooray women bloggers!

Best single picture of MKH I ever did see. Wowsers. That smile alone is a homewrecker. 
Also be sure to catch Hawkins&#039;s Drudgy, Hot Air-ish &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conservativegrapevine.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Conservative Grapevine&lt;/a&gt;, if you haven&#039;t already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooooray women bloggers!</p>
<p>Best single picture of MKH I ever did see. Wowsers. That smile alone is a homewrecker.<br />
Also be sure to catch Hawkins&#8217;s Drudgy, Hot Air-ish <a href="http://www.conservativegrapevine.com/" rel="nofollow">Conservative Grapevine</a>, if you haven&#8217;t already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almeehan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269286</link>
		<dc:creator>almeehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269286</guid>
		<description>Also tell AP not to look at MKH&#039;s picture too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also tell AP not to look at MKH&#8217;s picture too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almeehan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269284</link>
		<dc:creator>almeehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269284</guid>
		<description>Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meatpieandtatters</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269227</link>
		<dc:creator>meatpieandtatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269227</guid>
		<description>You know, why is gender an issue...unless it&#039;s about self-promotion? If writing is good it should stand on its own irrespective whether is was written by a guy or gal.....really!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, why is gender an issue&#8230;unless it&#8217;s about self-promotion? If writing is good it should stand on its own irrespective whether is was written by a guy or gal&#8230;..really!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight_Talk_Luigi</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269221</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight_Talk_Luigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269221</guid>
		<description>Interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Raging Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269217</link>
		<dc:creator>The Raging Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269217</guid>
		<description>She is fierce!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is fierce!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaosKlerik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-269214</link>
		<dc:creator>KaosKlerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/blogging-while-female-part-ii/#comment-269214</guid>
		<description>A bunch of uppity women thinking they can blog on a mans internet.  Who do they think they are? What makes them... huh?  

What?  

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MICHELLE &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Malkin?!  

Oh...  
Uh... 
Nevermind.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bunch of uppity women thinking they can blog on a mans internet.  Who do they think they are? What makes them&#8230; huh?  </p>
<p>What?  </p>
<p><em><strong>MICHELLE </strong></em>Malkin?!  </p>
<p>Oh&#8230;<br />
Uh&#8230;<br />
Nevermind.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

