Comments on: Conyers to impeachment mob: Wait ’til after Nov. 4 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:01:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: garyt http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269495 garyt Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:14:49 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269495 I wish the democrats had plans and alternatives that helped the nation as they do on investigations. They are far from JFK who used to say IKE is doing fine but WE CAN DO BETTER. JFK had more plans in his little finger then the whole Demo lot today. I wish the democrats had plans and alternatives that helped the nation as they do on investigations. They are far from JFK who used to say IKE is doing fine but WE CAN DO BETTER. JFK had more plans in his little finger then the whole Demo lot today.

]]> By: Kevin K. http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269477 Kevin K. Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:00:06 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269477 <blockquote>The Raging Republican said (#7): On March 19th, 2008 at 10:36 am, JHSII said: ummm…Rusty, <strong>and</strong> the dems are petty and weak. There, I fixed it for ya.</blockquote> Raging--I think that Rusty is NOT weak, and often isn't petty. While I usually disagree with him, his comments (and those of lgm) keep the comments section from being merely preaching to the choir. While he may enjoy stirring things up for his laughs, and not all of his statements are as well supported as all of us would like, he does contribute to many discussions.

The Raging Republican said (#7):

On March 19th, 2008 at 10:36 am, JHSII said:

ummm…Rusty, and the dems are petty and weak.

There, I fixed it for ya.

Raging–I think that Rusty is NOT weak, and often isn’t petty. While I usually disagree with him, his comments (and those of lgm) keep the comments section from being merely preaching to the choir. While he may enjoy stirring things up for his laughs, and not all of his statements are as well supported as all of us would like, he does contribute to many discussions.

]]> By: gayle http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269429 gayle Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:57:48 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269429 I say they can "impeach" Bush or investigate him for all I care, ONCE these liberals get rid of all illegals. Then maybe....just maybe they can gain some credibility. I say they can “impeach” Bush or investigate him for all I care, ONCE these liberals get rid of all illegals.

Then maybe….just maybe they can gain some credibility.

]]> By: GaijinBob http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269238 GaijinBob Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:57:26 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269238 <strong>meatpieandtatters</strong> said:<blockquote>He’s attached himself to the body politic for decades sucking the <strong>lie</strong>-giving juices from the citizenry.</blockquote>Freudian slip? ;) meatpieandtatters said:
He’s attached himself to the body politic for decades sucking the lie-giving juices from the citizenry.

Freudian slip? ;)

]]> By: lgm http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269194 lgm Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:53:36 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269194 <strong>On-my-soap-box</strong> said (#29): <blockquote>There is new secret evidence.</blockquote> A sense of humor and a memory! Thanks. <strong>Zelsdorf Ragshaft III</strong> said (#32): <blockquote>If the Dims try to impeach Bush, I would say it would be a fine time to exercise the 2nd Amendment for the purpose it was written. </blockquote> Is this a death threat? On-my-soap-box said (#29):

There is new secret evidence.

A sense of humor and a memory! Thanks.

Zelsdorf Ragshaft III said (#32):

If the Dims try to impeach Bush, I would say it would be a fine time to exercise the 2nd Amendment for the purpose it was written.

Is this a death threat?

]]> By: WilliBrimm http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269151 WilliBrimm Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:15:37 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269151 I'm sure that they have all the evidence they need to impeach.....so impeach everybody who voted for the war, after all <em>THEY</em> are the smartest people on the planet, surely <em>THEY</em> knew it was a lie before <em>THEY</em> voted for it.. I’m sure that they have all the evidence they need to impeach…..so impeach everybody who voted for the war, after all
THEY are the smartest people on the planet, surely THEY knew it was a lie before THEY voted for it..

]]> By: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269150 Zelsdorf Ragshaft III Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:15:32 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269150 If the Dims try to impeach Bush, I would say it would be a fine time to exercise the 2nd Amendment for the purpose it was written. If the Dims try to impeach Bush, I would say it would be a fine time to exercise the 2nd Amendment for the purpose it was written.

]]> By: normsrevenge http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269122 normsrevenge Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:52:31 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269122 Conyers would sink the ship to scrape the barnacles off the hull.. Leadership? haaa! Conyers would sink the ship to scrape the barnacles off the hull..

Leadership? haaa!

]]> By: JHSII http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269082 JHSII Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:22:12 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269082 <blockquote>One of the first things President Clinton did was to promote national healing by putting a stop to Iran Contra investigations.</blockquote> Wrong. The Iran Contra investigation was concluded completely a few months before the 1991 election. The results were held back until <em>after</em> the election because the democ<strong>rats</strong> running the investigation didn''t want GHW Bush to get any bounce in the polls from being exonorated.

One of the first things President Clinton did was to promote national healing by putting a stop to Iran Contra investigations.

Wrong. The Iran Contra investigation was concluded completely a few months before the 1991 election. The results were held back until after the election because the democrats running the investigation didn”t want GHW Bush to get any bounce in the polls from being exonorated.

]]> By: On-my-soap-box http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269071 On-my-soap-box Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:12:13 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269071 <blockquote>On March 19th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, lgm said: <blockquote>BrianNY said (#19): “Promote national healing?” Try, “promote ending the investigation before the Mena, Arkansas airfield brought the entire investigation to his front doorstep.”</blockquote> If there were even a shred of evidence for this it would be on Fox News 24/7.</blockquote> There is new secret evidence.

On March 19th, 2008 at 12:11 pm, lgm said:

BrianNY said (#19):

“Promote national healing?” Try, “promote ending the investigation before the Mena, Arkansas airfield brought the entire investigation to his front doorstep.”

If there were even a shred of evidence for this it would be on Fox News 24/7.

There is new secret evidence.

]]> By: Grey Fox http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269049 Grey Fox Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:49:58 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269049 It occurs to me that one reason they might not want to impeach President Bush is that they know that they can't convict, and that most likely he will come out vindicated. It is easier and a lot more useful politically to smear and spread half-truths then to try and prove things in a court of law. It also keeps them looking halfway sane to the majority of the population, while appeasing the moonbats, of course... It occurs to me that one reason they might not want to impeach President Bush is that they know that they can’t convict, and that most likely he will come out vindicated. It is easier and a lot more useful politically to smear and spread half-truths then to try and prove things in a court of law. It also keeps them looking halfway sane to the majority of the population, while appeasing the moonbats, of course…

]]> By: amigoneus http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269041 amigoneus Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:43:02 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269041 So, Mr. Conyers, you think Bush should be impeached for so-called lies. Which aren't even lies anyway, it's just things you don't agree with. But it was okay for Clinton to lie UNDER OATH because it was just about sex. Can you please outline for me clearly when it's okay to lie and when it's not? I obviously am too slow to tell the difference. /sarc So, Mr. Conyers, you think Bush should be impeached for so-called lies. Which aren’t even lies anyway, it’s just things you don’t agree with. But it was okay for Clinton to lie UNDER OATH because it was just about sex. Can you please outline for me clearly when it’s okay to lie and when it’s not? I obviously am too slow to tell the difference.

/sarc

]]> By: shooter http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269025 shooter Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:28:22 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269025 maybe we should imprison the Clintons....Lord knows they have <a href="http://www.etherzone.com/body.html" rel="nofollow">much to be held accountable....</a>lets just say if it were you or me, we would be in jail. maybe we should imprison the Clintons….Lord knows they have much to be held accountable….lets just say if it were you or me, we would be in jail.

]]> By: James Felix http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269018 James Felix Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:20:01 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269018 <blockquote>The Clinton <strike>persecution</strike> prosecution did not stop in 2000.</blockquote> Fixed that for ya. Look, I understand if you're a Clinton supporter. I don't agree with it, but I understand it. What I can't understand is how you can possibly believe that family hasn't been hip-deep in shennanigans for 30 years now. If you want to say you support them in spite of their incessant shady dealings, fine. But to assert that there isn't any shade just makes you sound delusional.

The Clinton persecution prosecution did not stop in 2000.

Fixed that for ya.

Look, I understand if you’re a Clinton supporter. I don’t agree with it, but I understand it. What I can’t understand is how you can possibly believe that family hasn’t been hip-deep in shennanigans for 30 years now.

If you want to say you support them in spite of their incessant shady dealings, fine. But to assert that there isn’t any shade just makes you sound delusional.

]]> By: dan708 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/comment-page-1/#comment-269013 dan708 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:17:23 +0000 http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/19/conyers-to-impeachment-mob-wait-til-after-nov-4/#comment-269013 For the millionth time Mr.Conyers, the fact that you don't agree with Bush's policy in Iraq DOES NOT MAKE HIM A CRIMINAL!! For the millionth time Mr.Conyers, the fact that you don’t agree with Bush’s policy in Iraq DOES NOT MAKE HIM A CRIMINAL!!

]]>