“The BBC regrets”

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 24, 2008 08:34 AM

Read this follow-up to I don’t trust the BBC, part 99,971.

Posted in: BBC

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #271496
    On March 24th, 2008 at 8:47 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    They can take their “clarifications” and shove them. They have no journalistic credibility. They’ve join the ranks of others like them, namely the CNN, MSNBC, etc…

  2. #271506
    On March 24th, 2008 at 9:05 am, almeehan said:

    I wrote BBC earlier about his and other items. They like to shuffle your complaints around and not accept responsibility from joe blow writers like myself. Glad enough pressure was put on them to make them acknowledge their blatant bias. They only regret that they got caught and had to fess up. They accomplished their goal that is to spew more hate and anti-Israel and anti-American sentiment. I wonder if they are streaming Jeremiahs sermons?/s

  3. #271537
    On March 24th, 2008 at 9:53 am, Larraby said:

    BBC amd NPR have the same agenda and the reporters in the MiddleEast for both outlets share ideas and information and ideology. Let’s recall that the BBC correspondent covering Israel stated that she “cried” when she learned that Yasser Arafat had died. NPR had one of its reporter accompany and Arab activist to a checkpoint where both ladies confronted the Israeli soldiers. The NPR reporter was far worse
    than the Arab activist. After they sshouted insults at the Israeli soldiers, the NPR reporter and the Arab aactivist slapped palms with one another. BTW, BBC refused to use the wword “terrorists” even to describe the ppeople who committed the London and SScotland bombings.

  4. #271538
    On March 24th, 2008 at 9:54 am, nbarry said:

    For years, the BBC has been on the watch list of http://www.honestreporting.com, along with Reuters, the Guardian and the New York Times. More power to this reliable monitoring organization.

  5. #271548
    On March 24th, 2008 at 10:17 am, lgm said:

    The BBC is more accurate than Fox. Fox found WMDs in Iraq every week for years after the invasion.

  6. #271558
    On March 24th, 2008 at 10:27 am, DaveC said:

    And David Icke is more accurate than you, LGM..

  7. #271637
    On March 24th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Tantor said:

    lgm: “The BBC is more accurate than Fox. Fox found WMDs in Iraq every week for years after the invasion.”

    The US military has found hundreds of WMD in Iraq, 500 as of two years ago, mostly in onesies and twosies, though one cache was about a hundred shells. 500 WMD over five years is about one per week.

    So it appears Fox News is accurately reporting the discovery of WMD in Iraq and the BBC is not. Why do you think that is?

  8. #271643
    On March 24th, 2008 at 12:17 pm, Larraby said:

    The BBC supports the Archbishop of Canterbury and gives the Archbishop of Canterbury all the time that he wants on BBC TV and radio. The Archbishop of Canterbury proposes that Muslims in the UK will not be required to adhere to British law but only to Sharia law. According to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Muslims in the UK will not charged for crimes in British courts but will instead be charged and tried only in special Islamic courts. And the BBC supports him.
    The BBC is forced down the throats of British citizens. When you buy a television in the UK, you have to pay a tax that goes directly to the BBC. British police raid homes and taverns searching for people who have bought their televisions elsewhere to avoid paying the socialist tax. If BBC had to compete with SKY through a free marker, SKY would demolish BBC.

  9. #271825
    On March 24th, 2008 at 4:47 pm, Mixer14 said:

    The BBC used to be the light of the spoken English world in Europe.

    Now it’s just the:

    Blabbering Bullsh!t Company

    Broadcasters Berift of Creditials

    Big Boneheads Certified

    Billious Blowhards Chattering

    Buttheads Being Creative

    Bad Broadcasting Claptrap

  10. #271978
    On March 25th, 2008 at 12:03 am, sausage said:

    LGM: The BBC is more accurate than Fox. Fox found WMDs in Iraq every week for years after the invasion.

    Quite.

    The BBC produces some excellent content… not perfect, but certainly better than the fear mongering nonsense on Fox or the insular American mainstream media in general…

  11. #351606
    On June 16th, 2008 at 8:58 pm, Politicalguano said:

    It is clear even to the most corrupt and brain dead liberal that the BBC despises truth, liberty, and honor. Anyone connected with the BBC must be assumed to be a malevolent liar whose chief purpose in life is to make the lives of other people worse, to extinguish freedom everywhere, and to diminish knowledge and reason from the face of the earth. To mention their hatred for religion and spirituality is merely to repeat the above. Orwell’s 1984 is the inspiration for todays BBC, except that Orwell limited the daily hate to 2 minutes and the BBC prefers 24/7.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

How a BBC charity funded the 7/7 bombers

August 20, 2008 12:22 AM by Michelle Malkin

30 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Stupidity kills.

“Right Wing” Colombian drug lord pleads guilty in NY

June 20, 2008 05:44 PM by see-dubya

24 Comments | 1 Trackback

“Right wing” how?

Quite possibly the dumbest thing ever published by the BBC

June 16, 2008 01:32 PM by see-dubya

47 Comments | 1 Trackback

They’re coming to take me away, ha ha! (UPDATED)

I don’t trust the BBC, part 99,971

March 12, 2008 10:49 AM by Michelle Malkin

22 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Boobs at the Beeb.

P.C. at the BBC, part 999

December 5, 2007 12:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

33 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

“Don’t Panic, I’m Islamic.”

BBC employs Hamas terrorist?

June 26, 2007 08:56 PM by Michelle Malkin

16 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Charles Johnson asks: “Can anyone explain to me how this does not violate British law? Because Hamas is an officially proscribed terror group in the UK.”

BBC reporter forced to wear suicide bomb belt

June 25, 2007 08:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

15 Comments | 1 Trackback

“I have been dressed in what is an explosive belt, which the kidnappers say will be detonated if there is an attempt to storm the area,” Mr Johnston said. “They say they are ready to turn the hideout into what they describe as a death zone if there is an attempt to free me by force … It seems the answer is to return to negotiations, which I am told are very close to achieving a deal.”


Categories: BBC



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook