See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. This ain’t Hell, but you can see it from here » Blog Archive » “Oh, Hell no!”
2. Lying About Our Brave Soldiers, Then And Now « Tai-Chi Policy

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #273882
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Affidavits? We don’t need no steenking affadavits!

2. #273885
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

   Cowards – ALL!

3. #273891
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:13 pm, bloghooligan said:

   what a bunch of pansies.

4. #273895
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:15 pm, nbarry said:

   One said yes, the others learned their truth-telling ethics from Hillary.

5. #273905
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, josetheguerilla said:

   Maybe they got thier war stories from the former first lady????????

6. #273906
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:22 pm, tre said:

   A liberal said it, that makes it true. Understand? Proof is only for conservatives.

7. #273909
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, DagneyT said:

   What? Sworn statement? So they can come back later and get me for perjury? No way! Stinking cowards.

8. #273911
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

   The bearded fools. All that’s missing is the Green Soviet Army cap and coat.

9. #273912
   On March 27th, 2008 at 12:27 pm, zorro said:

   Judging by their expressions after being confronted, I’d say they had the look of being caught in a lie.

10. #273914
    On March 27th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, RaisedRight said:

    Why would I need to swear anything under oath. Look I’m up on a stage talking about it, what more proof do you need?! Here, I also drew this picture of what happened on the back of a Denny’s menu. (The orange stuff is supposed to be blood… they ran out of red crayons.)

11. #273916
    On March 27th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, pgtips said:

    I do not understand this. How did the whole winter soldier thing get this far if the participants aren’t willing to lend any legal weight to their testimony?

    ’scuse my ignorance, we don’t hear that much over the pond.

12. #273920
    On March 27th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, cpodug said:

    Uniform Code of Military Justice ART. 107. FALSE STATEMENTS
    Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive, signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false, or makes any other false official statement knowing it to be false, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

    “THAT’s why I won’t sign anything!” /sarc

    Who said Winter Soldiers were dumb?

13. #273927
    On March 27th, 2008 at 12:41 pm, John Ansell said:

    Holy S., that looks like a young LGM!!!

14. #273929
    On March 27th, 2008 at 12:42 pm, John Ansell said:

    LOL Raised Right #10.

15. #273966
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, terrig said:

    Jose #5, too funny!

16. #273970
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:15 pm, NotaSlickFan said:

    #9 zorro You are exactly right. Their expressions and demeanor tell all–they are nothing but lying sacks of excrement.

17. #273971
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, tomk59 said:

    Who’s holding these hearings? Are they elected officials? If so, let’s have their names so that they can be contacted and asked why these people are not under oath.

18. #273984
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, procopy said:

    On March 27th, 2008 at 12:30 pm, RaisedRight said:
    Why would I need to swear anything under oath. Look I’m up on a stage talking about it, what more proof do you need?! Here, I also drew this picture of what happened on the back of a Denny’s menu. (The orange stuff is supposed to be blood… they ran out of red crayons.)

    I LOVE IT.

    Best laugh of the day. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

19. #273988
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:27 pm, RevJim said:

    Unmanly men.

20. #273991
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, thebronze said:

    They’re all cowards that just want to make accusations to hurt America, without actually being accountable for what they saw. Or vetted.

21. #273993
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, thebronze said:

    Oops!

    That should read:

    “They’re all cowards that just want to make accusations to hurt America, without actually being accountable for what they said. Or vetted.”

    Sorry.

22. #273997
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:33 pm, right_on said:

    Where are our elected Democrapic Committee Chairmen? We need to investigate the accusations made by these disenfranchised EX-soldiers, yeah, but first, let’s put them under oath, you know, like they did Roger Clemens?

23. #274001
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:35 pm, nyc123me said:

    “No, not a single one of us will stand behind our accusations in a court of law.” ..you won’t read that in the news.

24. #274003
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:36 pm, mtngrandpa said:

    Another anti-war group of liars bites the dust.

    When you put a whole bunch of people with PTSD together and throw them into a stressful situation that forces a lot of reliving things people would prefer to forget, it’s pretty tough.

    Yes, Army Sergeant, tough to keep the liars facts straight. Truth is so much easier to remember.

    Eagles UP!

25. #274018
    On March 27th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, JoAnn in VA said:

    Jason Mattera is going to be a name to watch, I think. I bet his folks are so proud of him- I know I would be if he were my son!

26. #274025
    On March 27th, 2008 at 2:04 pm, John Ansell said:

    O/T Did anybody catch Hillary on Greta’s show last night? What the hell was up with the crosses in the background? Just imagine if it were Huckabee, it would be plastered all over the place.

27. #274027
    On March 27th, 2008 at 2:10 pm, md1964 said:

    Sound like a bunch of Tofu eating, hemp clothes wearing Cowards.

    Typical Liberal mindset… Freedom of speech includes Libel speech, if it supports their hate of America opinion.

28. #274049
    On March 27th, 2008 at 2:25 pm, kevkersey said:

    One thing I’m curious about, is anybody going to research the “soldiers” that testified at WSII and see if they all were in fact members of the military? Or even served in Iraq?

    I believe that there were more than a few at WSI that were either never in the military, and if they were, never even went to Viet Nam.

    Anybody got any info on this?

29. #274078
    On March 27th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, emjem24 said:

    What a bunch of buffoons! These people are sick and not fit enough to shake the hands of the actual heroes… not the ones claiming they “served” and dishonor the military but saying such garbage.

    Did these people actually serve? If they did, the military should prosecute them for making false statements. What a bunch of sorry examples of manhood!

30. #274079
    On March 27th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, tomk59 said:

    Kevkersey; go to http://www.keohane.blogspot.com .Lots of stuff and links on this subject there.

31. #274098
    On March 27th, 2008 at 3:06 pm, Boomer said:

    epodug #12 you beat me to it. The UCMJ and Manual for Courts Martial are both a great way to anyone dumb enough to make a false official statement. In my long association with the Air Force I have seen more than one fool charged, tried, and found guilty for this offense. Goes along with that pesky “Thou shall not bear false witness” commandment along with those other 9 most modern Western laws are founded upon.

32. #274122
    On March 27th, 2008 at 3:31 pm, cpodug said:

    Boomer, then, of course, they could always be brought up on article 134, regardless of whether or not they signed anything:

    Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
    ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE

    Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.(emphasis added)

33. #274133
    On March 27th, 2008 at 3:37 pm, madchef said:

    They are liberal wing-nuts, they didn’t lie, they misspoke like Shillary.

34. #274139
    On March 27th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, BrianNY said:

    A kid from my hometown got a full ride at Notre Dame with the commitment to serve as an officer with the US Navy right after.

    He skipped out on his commitment, claiming an objection to nuclear arms and conscientious objection. When the Navy reassigned him to a supply ship hundreds of miles from Iraq, he ran away to a “resistance” group in San Francisco.

    Are these bearded gentlemen from the same school of thinking, or perhaps some of them are discharges due to mental reasons?

35. #274177
    On March 27th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, rightisright said:

    not surprised here, is anyone?
    I thought it was an ‘Onion’ production at 1st. and it was real…hmmmm?

36. #274199
    On March 27th, 2008 at 4:53 pm, graysonret said:

    They look like they’re in it for the fame. They can’t back anything up or legally swear to anything. They think they’ll make a name for themselves as some sort of “human rights” advocate with people congratulating them for their efforts. That’s all. They live under the delusion that the accusation is enough. (The way things are in this country, that’s enough). The only thing that surprised me was no effort to wave at the camera and say, “Hi, Mom.”

37. #274238
    On March 27th, 2008 at 5:52 pm, docflash said:

    Bunch of R.E.M.F.’s anyway.

38. #274284
    On March 27th, 2008 at 7:56 pm, Dimsdale said:

    They look like they’re in it for the fame. They can’t back anything up or legally swear to anything. They think they’ll make a name for themselves as some sort of “human rights” advocate with people congratulating them for their efforts. That’s all. They live under the delusion that the accusation is enough. (The way things are in this country, that’s enough). The only thing that surprised me was no effort to wave at the camera and say, “Hi, Mom.”

    Class valedictorians from the John Kerry School of Dumbass Sedition and Self Aggrandizement.

39. #274343
    On March 27th, 2008 at 10:28 pm, MTNEER said:

    Unfortunately the UCMJ does not apply to former members of the military. Lt William Calley was caught and convicted in a military court because he was still in the military. These “ahem” “gentlemen” are obviously civilians now.

    These clowns will not testify under oath now because that would open them up to civilian perjury laws.

40. #274350
    On March 27th, 2008 at 10:44 pm, Larry L. Sharp said:

    Jason Mattera is one courageous man. It will indeed be a pleasure watching him continue to grow professionally and confront those in American society who are leeches on society rather than productive members. Get ‘em Jason!

    This video reminds me so much of the utterly stupid hippies of the 60s. Won’t the 60s ever die out?

41. #274387
    On March 28th, 2008 at 12:51 am, arnold ziffel said:

    Every swinging one of those dweebs interviwed could not hold a real soldier’s jockstrap. I was an enlisted army aviation crew chief in Vietnam in 72 and cannot believe the same pathetic type hippie pukes from the 60’s still keep surfacing year after year. I wonder if those sissies ever have a difficult time looking at themselves in a mirror. God help us all.

42. #275796
    On March 30th, 2008 at 10:18 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    That doesn’t look good, and I know Jason’s good at catching people off guard, so the answers are probably not made up in advance.