Democrat Rep. William “Bribe-Loc” Jefferson gets a reprieve

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 31, 2008 10:34 AM

Hey, remember corruptocrat William Jefferson? Looks like he’s won something of a reprieve–albeit temporary. I’m sure there are other members of Congress breathing a sigh of relief, too. Just in from the Supreme Court, via SCOTUSblog:

The Supreme Court refused on Monday to hear the Justice Department appeal seeking to restore the FBI’s full authority to search the offices of members of Congress under investigation for crime…

…The Court’s denial of review in U.S. v. Rayburn House Office Building Room 2113 (07-8160) left intact a ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court that gives members of the House and Senate some protection under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause against criminal searches — even with a warrant — of their legislative offices. The specific search at issue involved the office of Rep. William Jefferson, Louisiana Democrat, who has since been charged with bribery and other federal crimes. The Justice Department appeal argued that the Circuit Court’s decision would seriously hamper probes of corruption and criminal conduct by lawmakers.

WSJ has more details:

Last August, a Washington-based U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a court order barring prosecutors from using evidence gathered in the office raid. When the government asked the D.C. Circuit to reconsider the stay, it voted 5-4 to leave the restrictions in place.

“Its effect is to critically undermine the executive branch’s ability to investigate and prosecute corrupt activity in an affecting the legislative branch,” U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement said in the Bush Administration’s appeal. Mr. Clement urged the Supreme Court to overturn the appeals court ruling. “Until it does so, investigations of corruption in the nation’s capital and elsewhere will be seriously and perhaps even fatally stymied.”

Rep. Jefferson, in a court brief, asked the high court to reject the appeal, arguing the raid followed inadequate procedures that “involved the compelled disclosure of legislative material to executive branch agents with no opportunity for the member to shield privileged material from view.”

A criminal trial in the bribery allegations against Rep. Jefferson was originally set to begin in February. The trial was delayed, however, while a federal appeals court considers whether grand jury testimony given by staffers against the congressman violated the U.S. Constitution.

Rep. Jefferson’s legal team has fought the bribery investigation and indictment by arguing the Speech and Debate Clause in the Constitution — which bars executive branch interference with legislative branch office functions — was violated during the FBI raid. Jefferson’s lawyers are citing the same section of the Constitution in fighting the grand jury testimony. Their arguments, however, were recently rejected by the federal judge presiding over the trial.

Oh, and by the way, where are the Democrats who will do and say the principled thing here. Hillary? Obama? Hello?:

jeffmoney.jpg
Photoshop via Theodore’s World.

Posted in: William Jefferson

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog » links for 2008-04-01

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #275978
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:42 am, Just A Grunt said:

    So left me get this straight. If a lawmaker conducts any kind of illegal activity within the confines the federal buildings you can’t use the powers of the judicial system to go after them? My Gawd if John Gotti had only gotten elected his troubles would have been over.
    What happened about a country being founded on the premise that nobody was above the law? So our Congress has carved out their own little class of royality. Isn’t this what inspired the French Revolution?

  2. #275983
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:47 am, tre said:

    Oh, and by the way, where are the Democrats who will do and say the principled thing here. Hillary? Obama? Hello?:

    I wonder, where are the Republicans? As I recall, Republicans were protesting against the FBI in favor of Willy Jefferson.

  3. #275984
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:47 am, Laree said:

    What hogwash and if we believe this….then it isn’t true that no person is above the law in this country.

    Who is his angel? Who is keeping his bacon out of the fire? It is politically convenient for someone to keep this stalling going on, to what end? file under whose your daddy :)

  4. #275985
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:48 am, ent said:

    Sheesh. No one is even denying that he’s guilty. It’s only a question
    of whether or not he’s going to get away with it. A decent man caught
    with his hand in the cookie jar would have stepped down years ago.
    But then, Democrats have no shame.

  5. #275986
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:49 am, cpodug said:

    Ahh, grunt, just remember, according to the Pelosicator, we now have the most ethical congress ever. Just think what it would be like if it wasn’t …

  6. #275991
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:54 am, meatpieandtatters said:

    Jefferson is just one of the privileged class of elected officials. The corruption knows no party bounds, sadly, and I believe is more wide-spread than we all think.

    It’s fanciful to believe that republicans are more virtuous than the liberals, which at least in principle is true, but more often than not, when faced with making laws, too often they are seduced by big business and fail the individual worker.

    Jefferson should be booted, but I’d imagine that once they start digging into these kinds of shenanigans they won’t be able to stop. The bar has been lowered so far we’re all paying the price.

  7. #275993
    On March 31st, 2008 at 10:56 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    Wow, Just WOW! What is the point of having laws now? He is caught red handed and now he will get protection?

    WOW.

    I suppose it is okay as long as he didn’t kill anyone.

    Oh, wait…

  8. #275998
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:00 am, taylork said:

    Amazing how he flaunts the law with one hand and then uses it to get off the hook with the other hand. What an SOB.

  9. #276000
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:03 am, zorro said:

    I guess crime pays if you’re a congressman.

  10. #276005
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:08 am, Barry F. said:

    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:03 am, zorro said:

    I guess crime pays if you’re a congressman.

    Agreed, zorro.

  11. #276010
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:18 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Who needs bribeloc when you are a Democratic crapweasel? (redundant, I know :-) )

    Just show your Dem card and you are free to pass Go and collect your hard earned cash bribe.

  12. #276020
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:25 am, CommentGuy said:

    Sounds like a one way street here.

    They claim the Executive Branch with warrant approval from the Judicial Branch is interfering with the Legislative Branch.

    But they all seem comfortable with the Legislative Branch telling the Judicial Branch (FISA Court) to interfere in a major way with the Article II powers of the Executive Branch.

  13. #276021
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:27 am, Sanddog said:

    So….Congressional corruption is illegal….as is investigating it.

    Uh-huh.

  14. #276027
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:34 am, docflash said:

    Hope and change,it is time to vote ALL incumbents out.

  15. #276029
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:44 am, cpodug said:

    Just to let you know, not ALL Californians are stupid – most of them, maybe, but at least the DHimmicraps did the right thing in this case.

  16. #276030
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:45 am, nbarry said:

    When it comes to law and order, Congress believes it’s for us, not for them. So typical of Washington culture.

  17. #276031
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:46 am, gayle said:

    Wright must have him on his prayer list.

  18. #276032
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:52 am, rainbow said:

    I want my country back. . .where’s the shame anymore?

  19. #276040
    On March 31st, 2008 at 11:56 am, katieanne said:

    This is just plain wrong.

  20. #276046
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:05 pm, TMoney said:

    Who bought the justices?
    Yeah, I just accused them all of being bought. But they can’t investigate me, because I’m in my office. Right?

  21. #276057
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:15 pm, ex-expat said:

    Let’s face it, SCOTUS has historincally been loathe to thread in areas such as this. The action, while on an emotional level is disappointing, is not surprising.

  22. #276071
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:31 pm, gandolphxx said:

    Folks, y’all should have learned by now – Jefferson is going to walk on this, keep getting elected by folks who believe that he is ‘owed’ this because he is black.

    This is how democraps rule, get used to it.

  23. #276074
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:35 pm, SHoward said:

    There just may be a bright side here, folks.

    Would any of you want to be in the Democrat leadership this fall for the next round of coongressional elections?

    The SCOTUS may have just handed us a really big issue to use. In the past, Repubs didn’t quite behave this way. We usually kicked out our own if they did something this stupid. Then Nan comes along and proclaims the most ethical congress in history, but wait….She is going to have a hard time spinning this, as long as our side has the guts to use it.

    At least I can hope….

  24. #276075
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:35 pm, CharlieT said:

    Caught red-handed isn’t good enough for Democraps – they will blame the redness on freezer burn.

  25. #276077
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Wade said:

    Duke Cunningham was unavailable for comment

  26. #276086
    On March 31st, 2008 at 12:57 pm, wrcnossen said:

    Term Limits would help, at least they would each have less time to do damage.

  27. #276094
    On March 31st, 2008 at 1:09 pm, Romeo13 said:

    Ok, so you can’t go into a Congressmans office even with a warrant…

    But all the Emails and documents, including those of the Presidents private lawyer, are fair game?

  28. #276095
    On March 31st, 2008 at 1:10 pm, normsrevenge said:

    Sooooo, the Halls and offices of Congre$$ are now considered a ‘Holy of Holies’ shrine that only the High Priests can enter.

    What an evil person it is who hides behind the cloak of Justice… with a bloody dagger in one hand and a middle finger extended with the other.

  29. #276096
    On March 31st, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Jim M. said:

    Rep. Jefferson’s legal team has fought the bribery investigation and indictment by arguing the Speech and Debate Clause in the Constitution — which bars executive branch interference with legislative branch office functions — was violated during the FBI raid.

    Because, as we all know, bribery and corruption are everyday “legislative branch office functions”. Reversing the decision would have a serious and suppressive impact on free speech initiatives expressed as bribes and kickbacks.

  30. #276099
    On March 31st, 2008 at 1:14 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I believe John Murtha is having a Sub-Zero freezer installed in his office even as we speak. It’s the loophole he’s been looking for ever since the FBI video…

  31. #276110
    On March 31st, 2008 at 1:39 pm, rooster said:

    If this moron were a republican, he would have been Duke Cunninghams (R) cell-mate for a couple years now.

  32. #276127
    On March 31st, 2008 at 1:51 pm, lgm said:

    Request to MM: equal time or Don Young.

  33. #276166
    On March 31st, 2008 at 2:18 pm, DaveC said:

    The Supreme Court refused on Monday to hear the Justice Department appeal seeking to restore the FBI’s full authority to search the offices of members of Congress under investigation for crime…

    kinda scary to think if the FBI had a blank check to go into all the offices and see what’s going on.. after all, ‘The MOST ethical Congres.. EVER’ should have nothing to hid..

    Also, as public servants, one would hope that they have everything above the table.. after all, being on the public teat and all.. (mumbles.) ought to be a law…

    In other news, the sale of small office freezers have gone up in the Washington DC area.. about 530 have been sold already..

    LGM..

    isn’t Vitter and Craig republicans? and I am pretty sure I saw their names on here.. but that wasn’t on YOUR terms.. so I digress..

  34. #276230
    On March 31st, 2008 at 3:03 pm, WarTip said:

    Nothing like seeing the “Cleanest House in history” in action eh?

  35. #276302
    On March 31st, 2008 at 4:07 pm, SeniorD said:

    Well, why not just try the corrupt Congresscritter (an oxymoron if ever there was) based on taking the bribes? Drop the requirement for evidence found in the Critter’s Office for later.

    Put him in jail (someplace nice a peaceful like Attica) then try him for corruption after the SCOTUS makes their decision.

  36. #276334
    On March 31st, 2008 at 5:10 pm, rightisright said:

    Just one more sign our country is falling apart at the seams. We are a nation of laws, not enforcement.
    He’s just one of the many corrupt, elitist, walking piles of manure.

  37. #276337
    On March 31st, 2008 at 5:16 pm, graysonret said:

    Doesn’t surprise me. And, he will be voted back into office by his constituents, once again. Congress will welcome him, not censor him. This is the “ethics” today, in a democrat government.

  38. #276371
    On March 31st, 2008 at 6:30 pm, secondsight said:

    What happens in Congress, stays in Congress. Visit your guy (gal) today.

    Bring money for a good time.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Culture of Corruption: Cold Cash edition

August 5, 2009 05:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

60 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Cold cash, hot Democrat mess

June 10, 2009 10:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Republican beats corruptocrat Bill “Cold Cash” Jefferson

December 7, 2008 09:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

102 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

So long, Bribe-loc.

Blog report: New bribery allegations against Democrat Dollar Bill Jefferson

May 28, 2008 07:30 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 1 Trackback

More from the “most ethical” House in history.

Even the New York Times thinks Bobby Jindal will win; Update: Victory!

October 20, 2007 08:25 AM by Allahpundit

74 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Sour grapes: “The prize is not necessarily an enviable one”.


Categories: William Jefferson




HotAir GreenRoom