Hillary’s a liar, part 99,999,999
Posted in: Hillary Clinton
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Maggie's Notebook
- An Empty Pantsuit, Hillary's Thirty Five Years Lies (Part One) | Stuck On Stupid
- Pro Cynic
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Hillary Clinton
Pundit & Pundette
» Intelligence agencies knew Hasan was a traitor
Legal Insurrection
» Will The Truth Be Hasan's Last Victim?The Powers That Be
» US Intel Knew Hasan Was Trying to Contact Al QaedaStop The ACLU
» How Can One Write About The 20th Anniversary Of The Fall Of The Berlin Wall And Not Mention Reagan?JustOneMinute
» But What Do The Numbers Mean?JustOneMinute
» I Love The Sound Of File Shredders In The Morning...TigerHawk
» Where were you 20 years ago today?
NorthStarWriters.com:
WHOA! That’s harsh – and very revealing. I wonder what else there is hidden away in her lawyerly past?
She’s not only a liar but she is a deadbeat…yet another bill not paid.
Libs, you must be proud.
Say it ain’t so!
What’s truly disturbing about this whole thing is not that she’s a liar – that’s already been proven beyond any shadow of doubt. What IS disturbing is that so many people STILL believe her.
If there truly were justice in this country, the Clintons, as well as many other well-known but unnameable politicians(hint – Chappaquiddick) would have long ago been sentenced for their crimes and we might really have an “ethical government(an oxymoron, if there ever was one)”
Wait! Hillary’s a liar?!?
but she sure is buffaloing alot of people, so is Oblahma.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that “she who must not be named” couldn’t tell the truth if her life depended on it. It appears the MSM/Clinton love feast is over with and the Obamanation is now the anointed one. The tales of her lies and deceptions are growing legs while the very troubling story about the Obamanation’s 20 plus year association with a racist anti-American pastor and church is no longer a story according to the MSM.
Unbelievable stuff, and amazing that it has been hidden for almost 35 years.
In 1992, when Bubba was the Dem. primary winner, the American Bar Association announced two things:
1. That the ABA adopted a “pro-choice” position on the issue of abortion.
2. That Hillary Rodham Clinton was selected as the “Female Lawyer of the Year.”
My father renounced his membership shortly after these two decisions.
Who was the liar in Rocky?
Aaaadrian!
I couldn’t resist.
FYI: Boortz is trying to arrange to have Zeifman on his show today to talk about this.
L
Thought it needed just a tad more emphasis on that last part Boomer.
“Wait! Hillary’s a liar?!?”
I have a cartoon where a guy is reading newspaper headlines. The main headline is “Hillary Lied”. The others headlines are, “Bear Craps in Woods”, and “Fire is Hot”.
What could Hillary’s parents have done to raise such a pack of unethical children?
There must have been a real Machiavellian philosophy in that household. Either that, or some serious generational blow back.
Bill and Hillary..
Wow, maybe the ARE soulmates and not just in it for the power grab..
Ha!
Remember, Hillary thinks she’s the smartest woman in America. What’s even more interesting are all the dumb people who support her.
Gotta wonder.
It takes a village idiot.
Let’s see.
MSM chooses McCain – all others trashed until being forced to quit race.
MSM chooses Obama – Hillary now being bashed and Obama stories being buried.
When the general election comes around, watch out McCain. The MSM will give minimal coverage to all the negative Obama stuff that will come out. Just like they tried to marginalize the swift boat veterans.
Something tells me that Oliver could’ve maximized his “warts-and-all” approach by just making a movie about one day (any day) in Hillary’s life.
Nonsense! The Clintons are upstanding moral citizens!
… oh dear, my nose seems to have punched a hole through the monitor and my pantaloons have caught fire.
As someone once said,”You can tell he/she (Clintons) are lying. See? Their lips
are moving.
I agree with commenters on one of the sites, the Dimms are so eaten up with
their Nixon/Bush Derangement Syndrome that this won’t matter at all to any of
them. You have women and bigots that are voting for HRC. You have Blacks and young people that are voting for BHO and I can’t explain the others that are
voting for either of them. The Obama people will believe this story, the Clinton
people either will disbelieve it or won’t care because it was Nixon she was
working against.
FIRED! For lying!!
Andrew Wilkow discussed this and compared and linked all of Hillary’s lies throughout her Presidential campaigning the past 2 years. It’s amazing that you have to find this in a small, low-circulation, Dinosaur Media Publication. It’s time the MSM big hitters picked up and ran with this info.
Interesting point, chief, but do you think people believe her, or have they just become sheep, conditioned by public education, to believe that they are too dumb to think for themselves, and must be led.
BTW, Carl Bernstein wrote a recent book about Hillary Clinton in which he uncovered that Hillary Clinton flunked the District of Columbia bar exam. Bernstein talked about it on some radio shows also. Hillary has covered up her flunking the bar for many years. And her sistahs in the MSM (Diane Sawyer, Katie Couric, Barbara Walters) won’t ask her about it. Can anyone imagine if Mitt Romney had flunked the bar exam? The MSM would have covered it for 20 days. Just what we need, a president who can’t even pass a bar exam! But than again, here was the first question on the bar exam: It is a violation of the law to lie while under oath: True or False?
JS – point well taken. I’d be inclined to think they ARE sheep, willing to be led – and the same can be said for the followers of the Obamessiah.
We know that education today isn’t about introducing the students to learn critical thinking, but to believe what they are told and not ask questions.
And that’s what makes it so disturbing.
Larraby, respectfully, I have to disagree. Failing the bar exam is not uncommon, it can happen to even the best. Case in point, my wife who graduated cum laude from one of the very best law schools in the country.
Usually one takes the bar exam at the end of summer after law school, after basically having an entire month where you do nothing but study and attend classes specifically geared for the test. My wife and I did so and passed by a comfortable margin.
When we moved to a different state, we both had to sit for the exam again (which…don’t get me started on…grrr…). I was not yet working so had the luxury of being able to prepare adequately to take the test again. My wife on the other hand was working 60 hours a week at her new job and trying to study at the same time. Not suprisingly, she failed. The next time around, she wisely took two weeks off before the exam and again passed easily.
Point being that the bar exam is easy to fail if you (for whatever reason) do not put in the necessary hours. In fact I would say that the exam tests preparedness far more than it does inherent intelligence or ability to practice law.
Who knows what Hillary’s circumstances were. But I am sure there are many more damning anecdotes one could dig up about her without relying on this one.
And how do I wish the bar had true/false answers. When I took the bar we had an entire fact pattern based upon Maryland water rights law. Which we had spent ohhhhh….maybe 5 minutes covering in class. And which I could only remember the term “riparian”, without having any idea what it meant. Scary scary moment.
I love you People………..I can’t stop
laughing…..NeoConNews…..You made my day….
OK folks, here is the perfect definition I found on the Internet describing a “Pathological Liar”:
I’d say this describes Hillary perfectly.
That’s the same year that I dropped my ABA membership. The final straw for me was the receipt of my “Young Lawyers” magazine, the cover of which boldly proclaimed:
“The Ultimate Pro Bono: Helping to Elect Bill Clinton President.”
Have to agree with that; I still consider the periods spent preparing for the California and Washington (state) bar exams to be two of the three longest summers of my life (the third being army basic training and infantry AIT). Came as a source of grim satisfaction, though, to watch a lot of the “smart kids” from law school fail because they got cocky and didn’t put in the necessary skull-sweat…
This is where Sandy Burglar comes in…
Next – shock! – we will discover dead people….
Don’t you just love the message? In order to “get ahead” in America, one has to lie, cheat, distort, obfuscate, and demogogue! If it worked for Hillary, it can work for you, too…The would-be leader of the free world. A beacon to those who would come here to better their lives (richer prey source, don’tcha know)!!!
And her first profession of choice was what? Oh, yeah…attorney. That didn’t work out, so on to the next best-actor profession…politics! Will she go into acting when she loses this fall? Why not, she has “vast” experience feigning surprise, changing personalities depending on setting, and pretending to be someone she isn’t.
If Hellary Rotten Clinton told me the sky is blue and grass is green I’d check it out to be sure.
In fact I would say that the exam tests preparedness far more than it does inherent intelligence or ability to practice law. – chapoutier
Oh, so maybe she wasn’t dumb, and just failed to put in the necessary hours to pass the important exams. Please, someone, tell me why this should make me feel any better about her becoming President?
Yashmak,
You missed my point. Unless one is actually able to devote oneself full time to studying for that stupid test, it is easy to fail, even for someone of great intelligence and ability. Some people actually have other things going on in their lives…jobs…families to take care of..illness…whatever, that prevents one from dedicating as much time as is necessary.
I have no idea what Hillary was doing prior to the bar exam that she allegedly failed. However, no matter what you think of her or her politics, she has proven to be 1) highly intelligent and 2) hardworking.
You are putting wayyyy too much stock into this. In fact Charlie Crist, whom I believe is pretty popular here failed it (gasp) twice before he passed.
Ohhhh….
And Pat Robertson!
This is fun!
And Pete Wilson! Twice!
Thanks, once again, Michelle.
This is one very dangerous woman. She really should have been dis-barred a long time ago, like her ne’er-do-well husband ended up after his perjury case.
And to think that she’s pretty darn close to stealing the nomination of her party to be the next leader of the Free World.
We have a family friend who is a very well known attorney. He is brilliant, but had
to take the bar twice. Frequently, very intelligent accountants have to take the
test to become a CPA two or three times. Sometimes people don’t test well and
at others they have other things on their minds. I don’t doubt that HRC is very
book smart. I just don’t think she has much common sense or a very good moral
compass.
Read that Slick had another meltdown in CA. Apparently, he is getting tired and
disgruntled. If the campaign lasts much longer, one or the other of them will have a really, really public meltdown, unless their handlers intervene.
No surprise.
And Chaputier, I believe young John Kennedy failed it several times as well. (But by most accounts a fine young guy and a tragic end.)
Reminds me of the commercial where the guys says,
“That makes me wonder what else I don’t know.”
“You know your wife hired a pool boy?”
“Yes.”
“And you don’t have a pool?”
Aloha,
4 times as I recall.
Failing the bar truly knows no political, ethnic, or socioeconomic boundaries. It is something for which all Americans can unite.
Just shows how pathetic our country is becomeing when the three choices for the highest position and most powerful position are:
1. A woman who is so in love with lying, she appears that telling the truth might be detremental to her health.
2. A man who has ingested 20 years of Anti-White & hatred for America rhetoric, that evidently agrees with it. (He may fool brain dead liberals into believeing otherwise, but just apply a little common sense, and the truth will enlighten you).
3. A self proclaimed Republican (Lord knows very few others consider him one) who considers (And has basically called) American Workers lazy and worthless, and wants to subplant Americans with illegal aliens as fast as possible. He is a One man “Illegal Alien Union”.
Its a sad state of affairs if THIS is the best America can Muster.
Obama claimed that he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. Actually, he was nothing more than one of these part time practitioners who show up once a week and teach a class for an hour, usually at night. He was never hired through the normal procedure in which lawyers apply to be considered for a professorship. He never had to be vetted through that competitive process. He just got some assistant dean to hire him on a nontenure track part time position. But at least he passed his bar exam. The DC bar exam has something like an 80% pass rate. So Hillary was in the bottom 20% of her group. Maybe she got tripped on multiple choice questions like: What to you do when you are asked a question under oath?: a) lie b)tell the truth c)say you don’t remember d) say that Clintons are special people and don’t have to tell the truth.
Larraby,
The University of Chicago respectfully disagrees.
He taught three courses a year. I know technically that he was considered part time, but I’d say that is pretty much what most full time professors do.
Why are you trying to make such mountains out of molehills?
chap, I’ll take a shot at answering your question to Larraby. Because it’s not enough to disagree with the substance of a particular politician’s position on the issues. If you’re an extreme ideologue who uses demagoguery as your primary debating tool, then you must demonize those with whom you disagree and denigrate their accomplishments and credentials at every opportunity. I’m a McCain guy and disagree with Obama on most issues, but I am capable of admitting that he is an extremely accomplished individual and a highly regarded attorney with an impeccable resume.
Have you ever take a bar exam Larraby? I’ve taken and passed two (California and Colorado).
#44 On April 2nd, 2008 at 4:35 pm, chapoutier said:
Larraby,
“The University of Chicago respectfully disagrees.
He taught three courses a year. I know technically that he was considered part time, but I’d say that is pretty much what most full time professors do.
Why are you trying to make such mountains out of molehills?”
Thank you for the link.
Agreed.
What is important is not whether Obama was a “professor”, a “lecturer”, a “senior lecturer”, an “instructor”, a “tenure track professor”, or an “adjunct professor”, depending on a particular institution’s definitions and preferred titles…ZZZ…ZZZ…ZZZ.
What is important, what is critical, is:
How much more of our hard-earned money will Obama seek to extract from us at, essentially, gunpoint? (Remember, the power of the State to tax – ultimately, if one resists the State, the State can imprison, even kill one.)
How quickly will Obama stop fighting the Muslim Jihad barbarian savages?
How soon will Obama abandon Israel?
How quickly will Obama gut our military defense capability?
How much easier to obtain, and more commonplace, will Obama make abortions?
How quickly and how severely will Obama destroy the quality of our healthcare by moving to socialized medicine?
How many dangerous, the-Constitution-means-just-what-I-want-it-to-mean-no-more-no-less judges will obama appoint?
How quickly and how severely will Obama curtail our freedoms, by further pushing and magnifying the power of the nanny state, to the point that we have neither freedom nor security?
There are undoubtedly more examples, but I fear my post is already long enough that readers’ eyes have glazed over.
These are the issues of overriding importance; that indicate that what we face, indeed what we ahve been facing for well more than 40 years, is a clash of irreconcilable worldviews.
Not sure I would phrase it exactly that way, granite, but I guess that is the general point.
But ask yourself: Why do you hate hope? I’ll bet you hate change we can believe in too.
#47 On April 2nd, 2008 at 5:16 pm, chapoutier said:
“Not sure I would phrase it exactly that way, granite, but I guess that is the general point.
But ask yourself: Why do you hate hope? I’ll bet you hate change we can believe in too.”
With the utmost respect, but…What the blazes does that mean?
What change? Hope for what? Any specifics?
Hate change?
Hate hope?
Wow, two straw men at once!
It was a joke granite. A joke.
#49 On April 2nd, 2008 at 5:20 pm, chapoutier said:
“It was a joke granite. A joke.”
Ah.
If so, you got me.
Rim shot to you.
chap, that was funny as hell brah.
The only reason this MAY matter to the Dhimmis is B. Hussein. If that lying racist wasn’t running as the second coming, none of them would be in any way disturbed by anything it did or does…
#27 chap said:
Agreed, my father and sister said it was a beast. The Series 7 is no cake walk either.
My beef is that she gets the rep as being one of the smartest and best female attorneys in the US (see ABA’s choice in 1992.)
The lawyers in my family laugh this off, claiming that there have always been far more accomplished women law partners (non-wives of state governors included)who have billed more and taken on more weighty cases than Hillary.
And many of these women attorneys might have even passed their bar exams the first time!
Wow, thanks for this article! She didn’t even get a letter? Then it must’ve been pretty bad.
Violate the Constitution? I’m ashamed to say I was surprised, but democrats do that all the time.