<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MSM mystery letter of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetoysurgeon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-309036</link>
		<dc:creator>thetoysurgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-309036</guid>
		<description>I thought &quot;D&quot; stood for Dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought &#8220;D&#8221; stood for Dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-287887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-287887</guid>
		<description>I think I might have used our old &quot;friend&quot; former U.S. Representative Robert Torricelli (the Torch; D-NJ) instead of NY Gov.  Patterson.  Recall that he was forced to step down for disclosure of illegal contributions to his campaign by David Chang, a businessman connected to North Korea.  An illegal candidate change to Lautenberg occurred after the allowable deadline.  Because he was a Dem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I might have used our old &#8220;friend&#8221; former U.S. Representative Robert Torricelli (the Torch; D-NJ) instead of NY Gov.  Patterson.  Recall that he was forced to step down for disclosure of illegal contributions to his campaign by David Chang, a businessman connected to North Korea.  An illegal candidate change to Lautenberg occurred after the allowable deadline.  Because he was a Dem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaosKlerik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278906</link>
		<dc:creator>KaosKlerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278906</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On April 2nd, 2008 at 7:59 pm, TheOtherSide said: 

Oh please. How many times had Fox News put a (D) next to the name of a Republican who has done something wrong.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As if they wouldn&#039;t get called for it.  This is actually a strawman argument but I&#039;ll answer it anyway.  I heard they did that with Foley, but IIRC that mistake was widespread when it first broke, probably due to associating the name with ex-House Speaker Tom Foley(D).  

There is a difference between mislabeling and deliberately dropping.  I&#039;m far more likely to believe the wrong affiliation was used by mistake, then the affiliation was &quot;accidentily&quot; left off (or buried), &lt;em&gt;yet again&lt;/em&gt;.

An unintentional error is easier to disprove than an intentional ommission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On April 2nd, 2008 at 7:59 pm, TheOtherSide said: </p>
<p>Oh please. How many times had Fox News put a (D) next to the name of a Republican who has done something wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>As if they wouldn&#8217;t get called for it.  This is actually a strawman argument but I&#8217;ll answer it anyway.  I heard they did that with Foley, but IIRC that mistake was widespread when it first broke, probably due to associating the name with ex-House Speaker Tom Foley(D).  </p>
<p>There is a difference between mislabeling and deliberately dropping.  I&#8217;m far more likely to believe the wrong affiliation was used by mistake, then the affiliation was &#8220;accidentily&#8221; left off (or buried), <em>yet again</em>.</p>
<p>An unintentional error is easier to disprove than an intentional ommission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaosKlerik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278889</link>
		<dc:creator>KaosKlerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278889</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On April 2nd, 2008 at 7:38 pm, TheOtherSide said: 
rooster,

My mistake on the 1st link, it matches better with what I thought was linked to above (here)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again.  Look at the HEADLINE - 
&lt;em&gt;McDermott ordered to pay up in &lt;strong&gt;GOP&lt;/strong&gt; lawsuit&lt;/em&gt;

People think lawsuits are bad soooooo, who gets affiliated with it in the headline?  Hmmmm?  

Even the wording is misleading.  Poor little McDermott is beat up on by the entire GOP.  Excpet Boehner is the only one suing him, not the GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On April 2nd, 2008 at 7:38 pm, TheOtherSide said:<br />
rooster,</p>
<p>My mistake on the 1st link, it matches better with what I thought was linked to above (here)</p></blockquote>
<p>Again.  Look at the HEADLINE &#8211;<br />
<em>McDermott ordered to pay up in <strong>GOP</strong> lawsuit</em></p>
<p>People think lawsuits are bad soooooo, who gets affiliated with it in the headline?  Hmmmm?  </p>
<p>Even the wording is misleading.  Poor little McDermott is beat up on by the entire GOP.  Excpet Boehner is the only one suing him, not the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaosKlerik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278886</link>
		<dc:creator>KaosKlerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278886</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On April 2nd, 2008 at 5:26 pm, TheOtherSide said: 
Seattle Time’s coverage of Foley 

I don’t see any difference. They did not put an R next to his name at first mention but did say he was a Republican in the 2nd paragraph, just as they did with McDermott.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!  It said it in the headline!  That&#039;s the part people read even if they don&#039;t read the story.

HEADLINE - Foley in rehab as House &lt;strong&gt;Republicans&lt;/strong&gt; try to contain damage
Paragraph 3 – “Foley, a &lt;strong&gt;Republican&lt;/strong&gt;, said”
Paragraph 4 – “House &lt;strong&gt;Republican&lt;/strong&gt; leaders”
Paragraph 6 (a three-fer) – “increasing questions about when members of the House &lt;strong&gt;Republican&lt;/strong&gt; leadership knew”...“scandal involving the &lt;strong&gt;Republican&lt;/strong&gt; congressman could cost the &lt;strong&gt;GOP&lt;/strong&gt; control of the House”
Paragraph 11 (a two-fer) - “Florida &lt;strong&gt;Republicans&lt;/strong&gt; picked state Rep. Joe Negron to replace Foley as its candidate in the West Palm Beach district, which is largely &lt;strong&gt;Republican&lt;/strong&gt;. “
Paragraph 13 - “House &lt;strong&gt;Republicans&lt;/strong&gt; went into damage control”
Paragraph 14 – “Rep. John Shimkus, &lt;strong&gt;R&lt;/strong&gt;-Ill.” 
Paragraph 16 - “determine whether &lt;strong&gt;Republican&lt;/strong&gt; leaders tried to cover up”
Paragraph 17 - “whether &lt;strong&gt;GOP&lt;/strong&gt; leaders &quot;knew there was a problem and ignored it”
Paragraph 21 - “the House &lt;strong&gt;Republican &lt;/strong&gt;election”

BTW The Seattle Times &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DID NOT&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; identify McDermott&#039;s party at all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On April 2nd, 2008 at 5:26 pm, TheOtherSide said:<br />
Seattle Time’s coverage of Foley </p>
<p>I don’t see any difference. They did not put an R next to his name at first mention but did say he was a Republican in the 2nd paragraph, just as they did with McDermott.</p></blockquote>
<p>ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!  It said it in the headline!  That&#8217;s the part people read even if they don&#8217;t read the story.</p>
<p>HEADLINE &#8211; Foley in rehab as House <strong>Republicans</strong> try to contain damage<br />
Paragraph 3 – “Foley, a <strong>Republican</strong>, said”<br />
Paragraph 4 – “House <strong>Republican</strong> leaders”<br />
Paragraph 6 (a three-fer) – “increasing questions about when members of the House <strong>Republican</strong> leadership knew”&#8230;“scandal involving the <strong>Republican</strong> congressman could cost the <strong>GOP</strong> control of the House”<br />
Paragraph 11 (a two-fer) &#8211; “Florida <strong>Republicans</strong> picked state Rep. Joe Negron to replace Foley as its candidate in the West Palm Beach district, which is largely <strong>Republican</strong>. “<br />
Paragraph 13 &#8211; “House <strong>Republicans</strong> went into damage control”<br />
Paragraph 14 – “Rep. John Shimkus, <strong>R</strong>-Ill.”<br />
Paragraph 16 &#8211; “determine whether <strong>Republican</strong> leaders tried to cover up”<br />
Paragraph 17 &#8211; “whether <strong>GOP</strong> leaders &#8220;knew there was a problem and ignored it”<br />
Paragraph 21 &#8211; “the House <strong>Republican </strong>election”</p>
<p>BTW The Seattle Times <em><strong>DID NOT</strong></em> identify McDermott&#8217;s party at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278710</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278710</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Deanna said: &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;On April 2nd, 2008 at 5:27 pm, chapoutier said:
Just as I would guess that everyone reading McDermott’s hometown newspaper probably knows he’s a dem.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, here in the Seattle area, we all know he’s an M (for moonbat). Unfortunately, the district that elects him is that shade of tinfoil as well, and the rest of us just get to watch in agony.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can sympathize, Deanna. I&#039;m originally from Ithaca, NY... the fingerlakes version of Berkley insanity, and we have another moonbat inductee in the form of Maurice Hinchy. He&#039;s been around for years. I mean from the time I was a kid &#039;til now in my 30&#039;s. I no longer live in this area, but I wish my parents (who still live there) had better representation.

I don&#039;t care if there is an R or a D after your name, if you just plain suck as a representative, and have numerous scandals attached to your name, you need to step down. Unfortunately, the far left control Ithaca, like they control most college and urban settings. It&#039;s really too sad... probably why many people in their 20&#039;s and 30&#039;s who grew up there don&#039;t stay. Plus, the economy in the Upstate NY region is in the crapper so there&#039;s very little reason to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Deanna said: </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>On April 2nd, 2008 at 5:27 pm, chapoutier said:<br />
Just as I would guess that everyone reading McDermott’s hometown newspaper probably knows he’s a dem.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, here in the Seattle area, we all know he’s an M (for moonbat). Unfortunately, the district that elects him is that shade of tinfoil as well, and the rest of us just get to watch in agony.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can sympathize, Deanna. I&#8217;m originally from Ithaca, NY&#8230; the fingerlakes version of Berkley insanity, and we have another moonbat inductee in the form of Maurice Hinchy. He&#8217;s been around for years. I mean from the time I was a kid &#8217;til now in my 30&#8242;s. I no longer live in this area, but I wish my parents (who still live there) had better representation.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if there is an R or a D after your name, if you just plain suck as a representative, and have numerous scandals attached to your name, you need to step down. Unfortunately, the far left control Ithaca, like they control most college and urban settings. It&#8217;s really too sad&#8230; probably why many people in their 20&#8242;s and 30&#8242;s who grew up there don&#8217;t stay. Plus, the economy in the Upstate NY region is in the crapper so there&#8217;s very little reason to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBNinKY</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278616</link>
		<dc:creator>DBNinKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278616</guid>
		<description>&quot;D&quot;= Denial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;D&#8221;= Denial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whysoangry</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278496</link>
		<dc:creator>whysoangry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278496</guid>
		<description>Our Minneapolis StarTribune was running the Spitzer AP feed, and the &#039;comments&#039; section was filling up with people questioning why it didn&#039;t say &quot;D&quot; or &quot;Democrat&quot; ANYWHERE in the article.  So they added it, and an update would come in from AP a few minutes later and it would disappear again.  So an editor finally commented that they&#039;d told the AP about it, and that the Strib would put it in a photo caption so it would stay, which they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Minneapolis StarTribune was running the Spitzer AP feed, and the &#8216;comments&#8217; section was filling up with people questioning why it didn&#8217;t say &#8220;D&#8221; or &#8220;Democrat&#8221; ANYWHERE in the article.  So they added it, and an update would come in from AP a few minutes later and it would disappear again.  So an editor finally commented that they&#8217;d told the AP about it, and that the Strib would put it in a photo caption so it would stay, which they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaker1214</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278472</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaker1214</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278472</guid>
		<description>Not that either party has a lock on unsocial behavior, but I have noticed that if a Republican is the subject of the story, the word &quot;Republican&quot; is listed first or second in the story.  If it&#039;s a Democrat, it &lt;em&gt;may&lt;/em&gt; be mentioned several paragraphs in.  I&#039;ve always thought the idea that Republicans are inherently corrupt and Democrats are angels to be laughable.  As if one&#039;s party affiliation is, in and of itself, a value or social more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that either party has a lock on unsocial behavior, but I have noticed that if a Republican is the subject of the story, the word &#8220;Republican&#8221; is listed first or second in the story.  If it&#8217;s a Democrat, it <em>may</em> be mentioned several paragraphs in.  I&#8217;ve always thought the idea that Republicans are inherently corrupt and Democrats are angels to be laughable.  As if one&#8217;s party affiliation is, in and of itself, a value or social more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rooster</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278451</link>
		<dc:creator>rooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278451</guid>
		<description>DaveC,

No Big Beaver Road is not a joke. The generic name is actually 16 Mile Road which runs parrellel with the border (8 Mile Road)of Detroit. Still relatively safe, 8 miles north of the war zone.

&lt;strong&gt;Warning: Crossing 8 Mile Road into Detroit may or will result in loss of life or possessions! &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveC,</p>
<p>No Big Beaver Road is not a joke. The generic name is actually 16 Mile Road which runs parrellel with the border (8 Mile Road)of Detroit. Still relatively safe, 8 miles north of the war zone.</p>
<p><strong>Warning: Crossing 8 Mile Road into Detroit may or will result in loss of life or possessions! </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278414</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278414</guid>
		<description>At the rate things are going, are there going to be any democrats running in 2012? If so, are they going to be running on the campaign slogan, &quot;My police record is less than my opponent&#039;s record&quot;? By then, there will be a law passed banning any use of &quot;-d&quot; or &quot;(D)&quot; in news reports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the rate things are going, are there going to be any democrats running in 2012? If so, are they going to be running on the campaign slogan, &#8220;My police record is less than my opponent&#8217;s record&#8221;? By then, there will be a law passed banning any use of &#8220;-d&#8221; or &#8220;(D)&#8221; in news reports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278356</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278356</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And wait–oh, there it is–also in the third paragraph–the letter of the day makes an appearance in the sordid tale of Sen. Debbie Stabenow’s Spitzeresque hubby&lt;/blockquote&gt;

funny that...

He was at a motel with a hooker just off of exit 69 onto Big Beaver Road on I-75 in Troy, MI...

it&#039;s not a  joke..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And wait–oh, there it is–also in the third paragraph–the letter of the day makes an appearance in the sordid tale of Sen. Debbie Stabenow’s Spitzeresque hubby</p></blockquote>
<p>funny that&#8230;</p>
<p>He was at a motel with a hooker just off of exit 69 onto Big Beaver Road on I-75 in Troy, MI&#8230;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s not a  joke..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almeehan</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278272</link>
		<dc:creator>almeehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278272</guid>
		<description>Dolt, dummy, deceitful,dastardly, dimwitted, disgusting, dangerous, duplicit,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dolt, dummy, deceitful,dastardly, dimwitted, disgusting, dangerous, duplicit,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beenthere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278216</link>
		<dc:creator>beenthere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278216</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Stabenow&#039;s Husband?   [Ramesh Ponnuru]

How is this any of our (the reading public&#039;s, that is) business?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Over at the NRO I saw the above and I confess I am starting to feel the same.  Getting Spitzer was one thing.  The man was a monster, a hypocrite of the first order, and he deserved everything he got.  That a 22-year old girl brought him done, something that armies of impotent republicans would never have been able to accomplish, was well worth applauding.  But getting itchy over some politician&#039;s spouse being caught by cops on pervert patrol does nothing for me.  Shouldn&#039;t these police resources, represented by these sex clowns, be allocated to other and superior ends: e.g. protecting the public against muggers, rapists, and killers?  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Stabenow&#8217;s Husband?   [Ramesh Ponnuru]</p>
<p>How is this any of our (the reading public&#8217;s, that is) business?</p></blockquote>
<p>Over at the NRO I saw the above and I confess I am starting to feel the same.  Getting Spitzer was one thing.  The man was a monster, a hypocrite of the first order, and he deserved everything he got.  That a 22-year old girl brought him done, something that armies of impotent republicans would never have been able to accomplish, was well worth applauding.  But getting itchy over some politician&#8217;s spouse being caught by cops on pervert patrol does nothing for me.  Shouldn&#8217;t these police resources, represented by these sex clowns, be allocated to other and superior ends: e.g. protecting the public against muggers, rapists, and killers?  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rooster</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-278199</link>
		<dc:creator>rooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/02/the-msm-mystery-letter-of-the-day/#comment-278199</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I let the stupidity in trollness get the best of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I let the stupidity in trollness get the best of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

