See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Michelle Malkin » Democrats, Radical Preachers, and Identity Politics

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #1
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:18 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

   AHHHHH,

   Reverend 666 again.

2. #2
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

   BTW - welcome back see-dubya.

3. #3
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   The double standard is stupendous.

4. #4
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:20 pm, megapotamus said:

   I’ve been a lifelong if not too participatory Catholic and I have never seen anything remotely approaching this level of vitriol on ANY topic. This is a disgusting display of irrationality, menace and simple stupidity. What kind of Catholics are sitting in those pews? What kind of people? What in the name of a greasy slide to perdition is wrong in Chicago? Looks like plenty. Heep’um plenty.

5. #5
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:23 pm, graysonret said:

   The democrats are imploding even before the convention. They ought to look around for a “dark horse” or lose this election worse than McGovern did.

6. #6
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm, J S Ragman said:

   “How dare I?”

   It is my right, as an American citizen, to call BS when I see it.

   Now shut up, and go run the bingo game.

7. #7
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:30 pm, ajmontana said:

   i just love the way they say his words were taken out of context…
   blah flippin blah blah blah….
   lying turd burpers.

8. #8
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:30 pm, ttevolla said:

   Does pfleger actually believe fart-in-a-can will be appreciative of said defense?

9. #9
   On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:35 pm, Walldog said:

   Something tells me that Pfleger will be in for a surprise on Judgement day.

   Matthew 7:22-23

   I pity the man.

10. #10
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:37 pm, letget said:

    Just keep letting these people keep talking. They will let American’s know what and who bho and mo think of us. Don’t think they really like most of us, but we want your money and votes.
    L

11. #11
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:39 pm, dm60462 said:

    Great, now Fr “Repeal the 2nd Amendment” Plfeger’s going to get an even bigger ego than he already has.

12. #12
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:40 pm, rooster said:

    Is this guy a catholic?

13. #13
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:43 pm, ajmontana said:

    Is this guy a catholic?

    I think he’s just stoned.

14. #14
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:48 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Any truth to the rumor that the Rev. Michael Pfleger is Father Charles Coughlin’s illegitimate child? Just askin’.

15. #15
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 5:51 pm, rooster said:

    Only reason I ask if he’s catholic is because the church should defrock him immediately if he is a Catholic priest.

    If Obama gets elected with all the nutcases that are in his pulpit; we are in trouble in the US of A!

    Stock up on 2nd amendment provisions folks!

16. #16
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 6:12 pm, countrybumpkin said:

    Anybody have the Popes home number? This guy needs a new line of work.

17. #17
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 6:39 pm, jegjr said:

    Remember, they voted for “a was an altar boy” John Kerry. But the difference between John Kerry and W. was - they knew that W. meant it, and they knew John Kerry didn’t. Same thing with the Religious Right and the, ahem, “Reverend”s Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, et al,,,, they know that those guys are full of crap- and aren’t really “religious”.

18. #18
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 6:43 pm, dankitti said:

    In defending Reverend Wright, Obama said he was the Crazy Uncle and he said, if you could take the five dumbest things you ever said and put them in a 30-second sound bite….

    So his defense is that Reverend Wright is dumb and insane, which is an interesting defense. What will he say abiut THIS guy?

19. #19
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 6:45 pm, Armigerous said:

    Well,I can remember back in high school having serious doctrinal disputes with Catholics…I being a member of the Church of Christ (not UCC…the REAL Church of Christ…no instrumental music in the worship service etc)…and we would argue over full immersion baptism vs sprinkling and about whether it should be wine or grape juice at Communion and such as that…but I have NEVER confronted the kind of vicious bile that this so called priest “Evil Eye” Pfleger was spewing in his defense of ‘Reverend’ Jeremiah Wright…if these people are ministers of the Gospel,then I must have missed some Sunday School lessons somewhere along the line

20. #20
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 6:51 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    I surprised the Archbishop of Chicago has allowed this nut to rant for so long.

21. #21
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 6:52 pm, Al in St. Lou said:

    “I am surprised”

    PIMF

22. #22
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:09 pm, tgusa said:

    In thinking about all this it occurred to me that this ideology was not much different than what Manson was advocating in the sixties. Is this the change we are hearing about, where Manson types trade their jail cell for the pulpit?
    Here’s another link
    The Beatles, Manson and the question, where did Rev. Wright get his ideas? , “Beatles were urging black people to arise and revolt against the white establishment.” (Blackbird, the White Album) The Beatles? Who knew? And No, I’m not necessarily sayin that the Rev is the black chuck manson or that BO is one of his family members.

23. #23
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:11 pm, bit_boy said:

    I can only wonder what a Sunday service on the White House lawn might be with a couple hundred Subculture members, Michelle Obama, Jeremiah Wright, Michael Pfleger, and Louis Farrakhan. Need I say more, other than it’s not going to happen.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1994240/posts

    Like Wright, Father Michael Pfleger has close ties to Barack Hussein Obama and Father Michael Pfleger’s endorsement appears on Obama’s faith endorsements page, where Jeremiah Wright’s used to be… before he became too much of an embarrassment.

    http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=42181&cat=14:

    Pfleger, a respected social advocate in Chicago, had invited Wright to deliver a blessing at Saint Sabina during a visit by Maya Angelou. From the pulpit Pfleger went into an animated sermon blasting those who had criticized Wright. Pfleger said:

    “Dr. Wright is one of the great biblical scholars of our country and the best of preachers in the prophetic tradition. Dr. Wright has been shamefully demonized by 30 second sound bites that have tried to re-define him into someone other than who he is.”

    http://dallassouthblog.com/2007/05/30/min-louis-farrakhan-visits-father-michael-pfleger-and-st-sabina/

    Last week (May 25) the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan spoke at The Faith Community of St. Sabina, which is pastored by Father Michael Pfleger.

    (Dr.) Father Pfleger and Min. Farrakhan have shared an long friendship as they both have labored to uplift the African-American community in Chicago and throughout the country.

    Note: wonderment, wonderment, wonderment, both Pfleger and Wright are ‘Dr.’s Where did then get such distinctions. The GDA University.

24. #24
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:17 pm, dankitti said:

    “Beatles were urging black people to arise and revolt against the white establishment.” (Blackbird, the White Album)

    But what would that say about Paul McCartney’s song Bluebird? Is he urging The Smurfs to arise and revolt too?

25. #25
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:17 pm, Tennessee Dave said:

    See-Dubya,
    How about:

    Keep your scripture
    Out of the picture

    or

    Keep your liberal bible interpretation
    Away from the government of our nation

26. #26
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:23 pm, Ralph Gizzip said:

    Just one more plank in the platform for Obama’s campaign

27. #27
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:31 pm, Bruce said:

    Obama HUSSEIN is a disgrace to the entire United States of America. This man strongly supports murdering children, and he associates with the most base segment of humanity: Men who use religion as a platform to propagate hatred, racism, division, and communism.

    Shame on all of us for allowing a man like this to reside in our country. Cursed are we for allowing him to be considered for the Presidency!

28. #28
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 7:36 pm, zorro said:

    Only reason I ask if he’s catholic is because the church should defrock him immediately if he is a Catholic priest.

    Pope John Paul II would not put up with this fool. I’m pretty sure Benedict XVI will not tolerate him either. It may take a few weeks but I expect someone to act and act quickly to get this guy off the alter and into a nut house were he belongs.

29. #29
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 8:01 pm, tgusa said:

    #23
    Looks like we need a full accounting of former Beatles works. Bluebird? This is unbelievable! How could this be allowed to go on? Who really shot Lennon… and why? Prepare yourselves people this may only be the tip of the dungheap.

    #26
    I know how you feel and I have to ask, are we on candid camera or something? I cant think of another explanation.

30. #30
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 8:14 pm, Armigerous said:

    I’m not entirely sure of what this means culturally in the light of what this joke of a priest has been saying,but Pfleger is the German word for ‘male nurse’…personally I think he uses mincing gel in his hair

31. #31
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 9:55 pm, countrybumpkin said:

    Last summer, this jerk and Jessie Jackson spent their weekends picketing a gun dealer in the Chicago area, at least until the TV crews found something else to do.
    He made some comments then that should have gotten him thrown out of the Church.

    Birds of a feather?

32. #32
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 9:57 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Another puke who hates America. Strange, he really enjoys his freedom of speech.

33. #33
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 10:16 pm, rightisright said:

    Rooster, i’ve been stocking up for months, just in case the supremes pull another New London, Conn. on us. keeping it dry too.
    Bruce, We can thank the Republican Party for their pirmary election rules for giving us a socialist for our presidential candidate.

34. #34
    On April 3rd, 2008 at 10:25 pm, Grey Fox said:

    Hey, it looks like the chickens ARE coming home to roost, after all! Ho, ho, ho.

35. #35
    On April 4th, 2008 at 2:01 am, BrianNY said:

    #12 rooster said:

    Is this guy a catholic?

    Unfortunately, these “peace-n-justice” priests became a dime a dozen in the early 1970’s.

    Hopefully the pedophilia scandals have shaken most of them out by now.

36. #36
    On April 4th, 2008 at 6:05 am, graysonret said:

    The scary part is the fact that there is a serious candidate for President who is a radical. Normally, someone like that wouldn’t have a chance, but, these days, who knows. If he wins the nomination, and it looks like he will, we can only hope that the country wakes up and puts this guy away, in an election that would be a disaster to the democratic party.

37. #37
    On April 4th, 2008 at 8:43 am, SweetNeoCon said:

    This is what happens when liberals gain a foothold in a traditional institution.

38. #38
    On April 4th, 2008 at 4:39 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    It’s funny: after years of complaints about the influence of the Religious Right, and clamoring to raise ever higher the “wall of separation” between church and state, the Democrats look set to pick someone who is irretrievably linked to race-hustling religious radical reverends.

    A fine alliteration, indeed!

    You know, I never honestly thought about the left imposing it’s “religious” views, well, I mean, outside of the fact that they give special rights to Muslims out of fear.

    But, I’ve always seen the hard, far left as wanting to eradicate religion so they can fulfill their selfish desires without natural law nagging their consciences.

    But maybe Ann Coulter had a point when she said something about the evangelical left. At first I thought, how can evangelical Christians be liberals? It just doesn’t make sense?

    But I see the brigade of Protestant reverends leads the way!