See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Iraqi court grants AP photog Bilal Hussein amnesty on terror charges
2. A Blog For All
3. The Jawa Report
4. Bilal Hussein Escapes Justice (For Now) » Winds Of Jihad
5. Jules Crittenden » Hopes Quashed
6. Rhymes With Right
7. Wizbang
8. Bilal Hussein Out « Hart Up North
9. Media Matters: Typical Liberals Acting Queer » Pirate’s Cove — Global Warming Rules!
10. The Associated Press Giveth, and the AP Taketh Away » Pursuing Holiness
11. Photographing Gaza – more questions in the case of AP vs. Stuart Franklin | David Campbell -- Photography, Multimedia, Politics

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #282819
   On April 9th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, NeoConNews said:

   So slap a tail on this goon and follow him to find some terrorists. Worse things have happened.

2. #282841
   On April 9th, 2008 at 3:44 pm, zorro said:

   Hopefully he’ll end up in Gitmo.

3. #282843
   On April 9th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, PBoilermaker said:

   Weren’t known terrorists offered “amnesty” if they repented and stopped trying to kill Americans? Is that the “new law” that gives Bilal “amnesty”?

   Also, why is the GBU-39 now a taboo here?

4. #282844
   On April 9th, 2008 at 3:46 pm, maurelius said:

   Al-Pazeera is likely to take it as a acquittal and put him back on the payroll.

5. #282901
   On April 9th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, lgm said:

   Of course, there was little evidence against him either.

6. #282906
   On April 9th, 2008 at 5:11 pm, Jim M. said:

   Amnesty is essentially a legislative pardon for a criminal act. To qualify for amnesty, one has to have been involved in the commission of a criminal act. Just wondering out loud what crime made him eligible for a pardon.

7. #282908
   On April 9th, 2008 at 5:13 pm, almeehan said:

   Of course, there was little evidence against him either.

   You surely didn’t mean that did you?

8. #283015
   On April 9th, 2008 at 7:10 pm, TexasTiger said:

   On April 9th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, lgm said:

   Of course, there was little evidence against him either.

   OK. If you say so.

9. #283204
   On April 10th, 2008 at 3:49 am, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

   Of course, there was little evidence against him either.

   Yeah, lgm, you know the AP journalists do what they do just for the good of mankind.
   They would NEVER protect one their own if he did something that might hurt the Bush administration, oh no, that wouldn’t be proper, and all of them are proper folk.

10. #283362
    On April 10th, 2008 at 10:31 am, smellycat41 said:

    The pictures are enough for me! We should not have to worry about a terrorist “rights” As far as I am concerned the only “right this man has is the “right” to DIE AND GO TO HELL!!!

11. #283554
    On April 10th, 2008 at 1:04 pm, huggybear said:

    the only “right this man has is the “right” to DIE AND GO TO HELL!!!

    Wow.

    The man was detained without charge for over a year. The courts reviewed his case and exonorated him. But he should die and go to hell, why exactly? Is there something you know the courts don’t? Perhaps being part of the Associated [with terrorists!] Press is reason enough?

    A study of the photos and examination of other witnesses bore out the account, and military investigators also acknowledged off the record that there was no real basis for charges. But they continued to raise them nonetheless — apparently because they were under relentless pressure to come up with some charges.

12. #284149
    On April 11th, 2008 at 8:39 am, sfcmac said:

    Hey huggybear, you need to read something other than AP propaganda:

    Hussein was detained April 12, 2006 after marines entered his house in Ramadi to establish a temporary observation post and found bomb-making materials, insurgent propaganda and a surveillance photograph of a US military installation.

    Link: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hrXLdLkkrNX6TjsQ-Kp_qzn109wQ

    No real basis, my ass.

13. #287907
    On April 15th, 2008 at 3:17 am, puhiawa said:

    We have lost this war. To Islamic nut cases. But are there any other type of Muslims?

14. #308719
    On May 2nd, 2008 at 12:09 am, bayou22 said:

    Won’t be long now before he’s into the time-honored art of fabricating photos for propagandist purposes. Thanks undefined legal system! (The US is the bad guy… again… just like always!)

15. #308876
    On May 2nd, 2008 at 7:35 am, kurthanson said:

    I’m sure he’ll be offered a teaching job at Columbia University school of journalism where he’ll be treated like a celebrity.