Man charged for racist death threats against Clarence Thomas, other black celebrities
A disgusting piece of trash, David Tuason of Ohio, was indicted by the Justice Department for making 200 racist, violent death threats over the last 20 years against Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas and other famous black celebrities who are married to non-black women:
An Ohio man has been indicted on charges that he threatened to blow up the U.S. Supreme Court and attack black men, including a justice on the court, according to an indictment filed in federal court in Cleveland on Wednesday.
David Tuason, 46, targeted black men known to affiliate with white women, well-known white women who had relationships with black men, and children of mixed-race parents, federal authorities said. Tuason sent approximately 200 threats, by mail and e-mail, over the course of 20 years, said acting U.S. Attorney William J. Edwards…
…According to the indictment, Tuason sent a letter to the Supreme Court building in July 2003 in which he threatened to blow it up. The letter was addressed to an associate justice of the court referred to as “CT.”
Tuason claimed “CT” would be “castrated, shot or set on fire…I want him killed.” The letter contained several racially charged remarks. The indictment says letters were also sent to several other Ohio sites, including the Kent State University women’s basketball team other high schools.
The earliest letter was sent to a high school track team in Mentor in May 2003, according to the document. The most recent threat, to a high school football team in Strongsville, was mailed March 3, according to the indictment. Edwards said the statute of limitations prevents authorities from prosecuting cases that go back further than five years. Investigators said Tuason also sent threatening e-mails to office personnel at Jordache Enterprises. The threats he’s accused of are mostly alike, promising physical violence against black men associated with white women.
USAToday has the indictment. The threats include vows to “stab,” “bomb,” “castrate,” and “kill” black men with white wives. “Mulatto kids are ugly freaks that should be destroyed,” Tuason further inveighed.
If you wonder how such views can be countenanced in the public square, look no further than the likes of Democrat Rep. Diane Watson, who expressed similar opposition to Ward Connerly’s marriage to a white woman–and suffered no political consequences for voicing such bigotry. She’s now a Hillary Clinton advisor.
Bottom line: This hatred has no place in American life. Period.
***
Flashback, September 10, 1991, WaPo:
Who’s afraid of Virginia Thomas? She’s a soft-spoken, hard-working daughter of the heartland. A brainy Omaha lawyer who has scaled the sheetrock of professional Washington. A churchgoer who invites homeless people out to lunch. A good friend. A good family. Why the fuss over Mrs. Supreme Court Nominee?
Her critics see her as more than just the supportive spouse who’ll accompany her husband, Clarence, today as he begins Senate confirmation hearings. They see a woman with strong opinions on issues that are bound to come before the court. They find in her further grounds for opposing him.
Some women’s rights activists are upset by her lobbying against such issues as comparable-worth legislation and the Family Leave Act. Some religious rights groups are troubled by her anti-cult activities in light of her involvement with Lifespring, a controversial motivational group.
Even the color of her skin is being used to determine the content of Clarence Thomas’s character. The fact that she is white has drawn criticism from some blacks who see the marriage as evidence that Clarence Thomas has rejected his roots…
…“If he is influenced by his wife, a white conservative who lobbied against comparable pay for women, he will be anti-women’s issues,” wrote USA Today columnist Barbara Reynolds in a July 5 piece. Reynolds, who is black, also is concerned by Thomas’s choice of a white wife.
“It may sound bigoted; well, this is a bigoted world and why can’t black people be allowed a little Archie Bunker mentality?” Reynolds said later. “Here’s a man who’s going to decide crucial issues for the country and he has already said no to blacks; he has already said if he can’t paint himself white he’ll think white and marry a white woman.”
Clarence Thomas advocates a colorblind society, and his marriage may well be an example of that philosophy. But others see a different symbolism.
“His marrying a white woman is a sign of his rejection of the black community,” said Russell Adams, chairman of Howard University’s department of Afro-American studies. “Great justices have had community roots that served as a basis for understanding the Constitution. Clarence’s lack of a sense of community makes his nomination troubling.”
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Race relations
Pollster
» Travel Day "Outliers"Riehl World View
» And So It BeginsHot Air
» Anticlimax in West Virginia tonightHot Air
» Hagee to apologize to CatholicsJawa Report
» Obama General Election Strategy Taking ShapePower Line
» Running Interference for Obama, Part 3Hot Air
» Breaking: Terror blasts in India, 60 Dead Updates: Military curfew in effect, according to HA sourceprotein wisdom
» Guilt by association by association (or, how learned to stop worrying and love the ill-fated Greenwich Village nail bomb)
David Tuason should have the book thrown at him. Maximum sentence if/when he is found guilty. And our public officials like Watson should forced to resign. That type of racism has no place anywhere in the WORLD.
Sadly, more than anything else, such hatred and bigotry is a sign of the times. When we stopped holding people accountable, and became a nation of politically correct apologists and feel-gooders, this was a very predictable outcome. As long as the overwhelming majority allow the deranged minority to set the agenda, there will be people like David Tuason - and there will undoubtedly be apologists for him, excusing his actions because … (insert your favorite excuse here) …
I took Journalism and Ethics in college. Got an A. Probably because I believed that anything newsworthy should be in the paper. Gory pictures? Print it above the fold!
The one disagreement I got to with the professor (who I absolutely adored) was over Justice Thomas. He said it was out of place for mainstream news organizations to mention Thomas’s wife’s race. But he also said that publications directed towards black audiences were right to mention her race since these marriages are noteworthy in the black community.
My argument was that it wasn’t the good kind of noteworthy. It also serves to fuel bigotry towards both blacks and whites. It would be one thing if her race mattered. We all know it doesn’t. If it matters to someone, that someone is probably a blockhead.
Anyways, I’m glad that this guy was apprehended and that we’re at the point where sensible people have no problem with interracial marriage. How far we’ve come in only 40 years.
Michelle,
If I recall correctly, you mentioned that your husband has assisted you throughout your career and vice versa. And you rightly assigned it to - what married couples do. They are there for each other.
People who have never been in interracial relationships seem to be experts on the inner workings of them. I remember prior to my husband proposing to me, my uncle emphatically stated that “he isn’t going to marry a black woman.” Well, here we are about to celebrate our 3rd wedding anniversary on May 9th.
One other thing, one doesn’t have to accept the fact that people are in interracial marriages, but when you have threaten bodily harm - you’ve crossed the line and will be dealt with accordingly.
It’s unfortunate that he cannot be charged with past threats due to the statute of limitations, he should never see the light of day ever again.
Where’s Reverend Wright and his little disciple Obambi when you need a comment?
Calypso Louie? We’re waiting.
As my father told my mother one day when I was a teenager, after my mother (who has her own tendencies towards bigotry — learned from her father) tried to assume that my father would throw a fit if I were to come home with a black man:
“I would rather have her date a black guy who will treat her well than a white guy who will beat her!”
That ended the conversation quick.
#4 30 pcs of silver:
Agreed.
Well said.
Congratulations on your upcoming 3rd anniversary, and God bless the two of you.
The wife and I are ourselves approaching 31 years in early June.
It might be an old line, but it’s true…it gets better every year.
Marrying someone of another race means you are rejecting your own?!? So much for breaking down barriers. I just cannot understand this stuff.
granite #7,
Thanks!
Congrats on 31 yrs! That’s a long time. I hope we live long enough to hit that milestone.
It makes me wonder about what people think love really is or what it really means.
Well, I just wonder why it means anything at all to them who someone else is married to. Ya know, since black people can’t be racists, why do some them exhibit racist tendencies?…
Rusty says:
Are you saying that people who disagree with interracial marriage are not sensible? I think adults should be able to marry whomever they wish. However, (and this is just my opinion and relates only to black and white marriages. Not Asian or Arabic or native) when blacks and whites in America marry, shack-up, hook-up and produce children, they create problems for these same children. The black kids don’t think they are black enough and the white kids don’t think they are white enough. Family reunions are awkward because almost all families have someone who is going to be vocal about their objections. If you don’t mind putting your kids through that, then more power to you. If I disagree with interracial marriages, it doesn’t mean that I don’t think you should be allowed to do it. It also does not make me any less sensible.
RaisedRight,
I assume that this mentality exists among a lot of ethnic groups, especially in a setting where they are a minority. The statement you made isn’t exactly untrue either. For example, if a person is raised Catholic among Catholics, but decides to marry a Hindu, they have effectively rejected Catholics. Now, they might not be marrying the Hindu BECAUSE they’re Hindu, but regardless of the reasons why they’re marrying the person, they’ve rejected those that they didn’t marry. Your statement is not so insane.
42 1/2 years here. For us, love is each giving 100% to the other. We’re also best friends.
Ron Rockstar,
I think we need to seperate the marriage issue with the kids issue. You’re saying that it may be sensible to object to bringing kids into an interracial marriage, but that says nothing about the marriage itself.
Again, as was mentioned on another post here yesterday, it is an issue of divide and conquer. As long as we the people can be led to believe that we are all some separate and unique subculture they can prevent us from actively becoming an American culture of a diverse nature.
What is both sad and frustrating is that their efforts have been so successful and even the words of people like Dr. Martin Luther King have been perverted. Conservatives and conservative values that have a long history of uniting different people of different backgrounds are made out to be the racists while those that historically (and even today) constantly point out differences rather than looking for any existing good in everyone, are made out to be the great heroes … when they are the ones dividing the people while all of the politicians seem eager today to divvy up the spoils.
Until we can Unite as Americans, this process will continue. I have a dream but unfortunately, when I wake up it is replaced by the nightmare our great nation has become.
Slightly off topic - Since I have had one Mexican wife and one Filipino wife, does that mean I hate all other white people now? As a Conservative American I cannot see it but using their (il)logic, it seems reasonable to assume.
All that being said, may God have mercy on this man because I doubt many humans will. (Or should for that matter)
#9 30 pcs of silver:
Thank you.
Yep, we’ve been very fortunate - absolutely.
As have our folks:
My folks are approaching 57 years in late June;
My in-laws are approaching 53 years in early July.
I wish you and your husband health and happiness…as my grandmother wished us back in 1977: “health and love” (literal translation from the language of the “old country”).
And, believe me, the 30th anniversary will come before you know it. You will be asking each other, “When did this happen?”
The older folks told us just that 30+ years ago.
And, of course, as know-everything youngsters, we thought yep, uh-huh, mm-hmmm, sure, right, etc.
But, as we’ve learned over the years, the older folks, having “been there” and “done that”, were absolutely right.
Especially with the influence - not good - of the counterculture that started in the mid-60s, and that has led us to the cesspool we are in today; and with the maniacal emphasis and obsession on youth and youthful good looks; a lot of us have to be reminded that everyone was young once, and that a lot of today’s “older folks” had drop-dead good looks that put to shame many, if not most or virtually all, of today’s “fabulous”, “beautiful” people.
Whoa…whew! Sorry.
Do we turn into our parents, or what?!
I have to admit, I married outside my race - I married a lovely human being(won’t say what I am, though). We recently celebrated 43 years together. I still am at a loss as to why she has put up with me all these years.
#13 Dave from Flint:
Alrigghhtt!
#15 On April 10th, 2008 at 11:23 am, WarTip:
Absolutely correct.
Very well said.
We need to get away from this stupid “tossed salad” metaphor being promoted by socialists and identity politicians (I remember the wonderful, inimitable Jesse jackson using the salad term a couple of decades back), and get back to the melting pot.
We have to get away from this dangerous multicultural cr*p.
You want to celebrate your heritage?
Fine.
I do, too.
Multiple heritages, fine.
But ONE national culture.
#17 cpodug:
Good for you!
My wife and I are trying, but we just can’t seem to catch up to you two!
Wow, that was a very telling quote from Russell Adams, chairman of Howard University’s department of Afro-American studies:
Amazing that such a Neanderthal believed that, Justice Thomas’ marriage to a woman of another race disqualified his nomination to the US Supreme Court.
Equally amazing that this Neanderthal was allowed to rise to the top of academia at Howard University just 17 years ago.
Unfortunately Brian, I think it goes far beyond just the halls of
academiathe industrial indoctrination complex. This is becoming an increasingly pervasive and destructive attitude in America today and one that there is no simple solution for.And I am also going to congratulate everyone on all of those impressive anniversaries. My first wife left me for her preacher (Who left her for my buddy’s wife) and I met my wife here when I was doing volunteer work before. We have been married for four years now and plan on making this one last.
WarTip,
Congrats on the marriage the second time around.
#21 WarTip:
Ditto on the congrats!
Regarding the pervasive and destructive attitude in America today…you are correct.
That’s what identity politics does for us - Balkanization and worse.
Does anyone remember liberal columnist,Julianne Malveaux’s, infamous November 4, 1994 quote regarding Justice Clarence Thomas:
I believe this liberal’s quote was the impetus for Ann Coulter’s proceeding satire regarding “poisoning Justice Stevens’ creme brulee.” But liberals never got the connection.
I suppose that David Tuason’s crime was a death threat, while Malveaux’s was merely a death wish.
#24 On April 10th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, BrianNY said:
“Does anyone remember liberal columnist,Julianne Malveaux’s, infamous November 4, 1994 quote regarding Justice Clarence Thomas:
“I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease….He is an absolutely reprehensible person.”
I believe this liberal’s quote was the impetus for Ann Coulter’s proceeding satire regarding “poisoning Justice Stevens’ creme brulee.” But liberals never got the connection.
I suppose that David Tuason’s crime was a death threat, while Malveaux’s was merely a death wish.”
Yep, I remember.
Good post.
Congratulations on your 3rd, 30. My wife and I will celebrate our 7th on August 25 (see, I actually remember it!)
We have 2 children. They’re half Chinese and the other half a mix of German, Welch, Dutch, English, and only-God-knows what else.
I think that man needs to read the Book of Ruth. Ruth was from Moab, and she married an Israelite. One of their sons was named Jesse, who had a son named David, who was not only the greatest King Israel had, but was an ancestor to Jesus Christ. So, since our Lord and Savior was of mixed blood, I don’t see why that man should complain.
Thanks Tre!
Congrats to you as well.
I just wonder why it means anything at all to them who someone else is married to… Boggles the mind.
Anazing that in this day and age there are still people who live life backwards!
Thankfully, there are more who do not make skin color an issue. Human beings should be judged by their character, the good they bring to society, and never on the pigmentation of their skin.
Ron, i have no idea where you get this.
while i respect people’s desire to stay within their own race, in terms of marriage, i wholly reject the stereotypes of mixed children being racially confused.
i think this might have been true of the older interracial children whom were products of radicalism (i.e. white women rejecting ‘oppresive’ white men and black men ‘conquering’ white women) - but anymore, interracial children are just as adjusted as their parents. if the parent are screwed up, so will the child.
Bloghooligan,
Children have insecurities with are then expoloited by other children, it’s cylical. Identity crises affect all children for any number of reasons. I pray that our children will be well-adjusted but I don’t plan on setting them up to fail. They have nothing to be ashamed of. Personally, I have found interracial people to be some of the most well-rounded folks I know.
in not one article is there an image or race description of David Tuason. is this man white? while it sounds like a safe assumption…jumping to conclusions like this leads to unnecessary tensions.
30,
we plan on calling our children mixlets to desensitize them.
hehe.
Well said, Tre.
I am 100% of a European ethnic stock. All my grandparents (and my mother in-law’s parents, as well as my father in-law himself) came from the same Mediterranean country, which has been at the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa for millennia.
No wonder, then, that my “ethnic group” has the highest rate of carriage of sickle-cell and hemoglobin C genes;
as well, of course, it has the highest, or one of the highest rates of carriers of the thalassemias (which blacks also carry);
and, also, has the highest, or one of the highest rates of carriers of a form of red blood cell enzyme deficiency, G6PD deficiency, known as favism.
Some sufferers of favism are so sensitive to an antigen on fava beans that they can suffer red blood cell hemolysis (destruction, and thus anemia) just by walking through a field of fava beans, and breathing!
The G6PD deficiency some blacks tend to carry is a different form - it was discovered when a number of black soldiers, during Korea, and later Vietnam, were seen to develop hemolytic anemia after receiving doses of quinine, or a quinine derivative, as protection against malaria; whereas this side-effect was not seen (or was very rare) in the white soldiers who had received the same medicine.
Just a long way of saying that you are absolutely right, tre; we are all far, far more alike, than we are different.
Bloghooligan,
Good one. Mixlets, can I borrow it?
He is ugly as sin no matter what type of pigmentation his skin has.
I have nearly 23 years with a Hispanic wife & I am as white as a fish belly. I once had a guy that worked for me who was Puerto Rican & Dutch, his wife was from the South Pacific. I have no idea what you would call their children, but they were beautiful & it seemed as if they got the best of all of the gene pool.
I’m rather speechless to agree with you, Rusty
out of curiosity, I wonder what race this guy is?…
I’ll have to disagree with you guys on the “mixlets” name. That is a label. You don’t label children. You made my point for me. If you label your children yourselves, just think how other children are going to label them. And don’t say that they are your children and you get to say what you want but others can’t. That is like the rappers saying that the “N” word is bad for whites to use but not for blacks.
Ron,
It was a joke… You know, HA!HA!
mpChops said:
RaisedRight,
Marrying someone of another race means you are rejecting your own.
Yes it is. Consider rather than rejecting your race, you marry someone of another race because you’re in love. Is that OK? Or rather, if it’s not OK, can you get a special dispensation from your local racist political leaders to do what’s not “politically correct” in their eyes? Maybe if you pay them. How much would it cost? Are we to insane yet?
Growing up in the military I was exposed to interracial couples during my first years on planet earth and never really understood the problem. You didn’t care if one of your friend’s Mothers (back then the career GIs were usually men) was Japanese, Korean, Pilipino, German, English, Spanish, etc. Even going to High School in the early 70s when interracial (black & white) couples dated I could never see the harm. You would think in this day and age most people in this country would be beyond this bigoted behavior, but I guess I am too used to living around the fully integrated military and our truly diverse communities. For those in a long term loving and caring interracial relationship I pass on my and my wife’s congratulations on realizing love is color blind. We just passed 25 years on 25 February, but are both short and stock mixed American (mostly Caucasian) mutts.
I wonder what race he is too? What a sick individual.
There is no rhyme or reason to whom we fall in love with. But unfortunately, I was in the Army with a girl who was black who married an hispanic guy who was also in the Army to drive her parents nuts. That marriage lasted about 6 months and then she got chaptered out. He was a really nice guy though and he was devastated by what she did.
Do remember folks, interracial marriages were prohibited in many states (including New Hampshire) until that Liberal Warren Court delved into the vapors of the 14th Amendment to rule the States didn’t have the authority to proscribe such marriages.
N.H. law called for up to 6 months in jail for any clergyman or J.P. who solemnized a marriage between a White, a Negro or an American Indian.
Sorry 30, I thought you guys were being serious.
Ron, do me a favor and spare me the liberal psychobabble about labeling children. white children are white. that’s not a label, but reality. black children are black. that’s not a label, but reality. mixed children are mixed. that’s a reality. the fact - another dose of reality for you in one post - is other children ARE going to label them. you honestly think you make children stronger by hiding truth from them? then do us all a favor and don’t have children. because those are the children who cause the rest of us heart ache.
race is not something that is avoidable as a topic, so the best thing to do for my children is to make the issue of race a non-issue. you do this by addressing the issue as often as needed (which seems to be a lot lately) and in a lighthearted context. there is no “being black” because the last time i checked, Eminem was pale. there is no “being white” because last time i checked, Tiger was brown. this country, at the end of the day, is separated into two groups - those who pay their bills, and those that do not.
Congrats Boomer.
Terrig,
That’s a horrible story. I guess we just can never tell where evil is lurking. I hope he finds or has found someone better.
Bloghooligan, I thought we were joking? I really did. But your point is well-taken. Kids don’t have to be coddle especially when we release them from the comfort and safety of our homes into this cruel, cruel world. Every attempt will be made to ensure that my kids are comfortable with who they are. It’s tough to talk about kids since we don’t have any yet but I don’t think I would raise my kids any differently if my husband and I were of the same race.
bloghooligan says:
I have two beautiful twin girls and you are stating that they are giving you a heartache. You are an idiot. And a lucky one at that. I don’t like it when people talk bad about my daughters.
While I am at it, you stated at the beginning of your comment that white children are white and that is not a label and that black children are black and that is not a label and then at the end of your nonsense you state that there is no black and white which means you are blind. Willfully. And then at the end you have your two groups of people BS. I called you on the label and it made you mad so you started making up nonsense. You call them whatever you want. You call them mixlets and George Jefferson called them zebras. Please explain the difference.
These are labels that will be used as long as we have affirmative action and the government needs to classify us.
Until we can all be classified as American and nothing more, the labels will hinder true unity.
So back to the original story, why did it take 20 years for them to tag this putz?
I don’t mind interracial marriages as long as there is a deep love there. It can be hard, these days, for a black/white marriage. There is always some idiot out there wanting a few moments of fame, tearing them down. I’m married to a lovely Indonesian. We’ve been together for 8 years now. Language still is a problem, but we get by that. She’s a conservative, dedicated to becoming a good citizen. Such marriages can be very strong. If Justice Thomas is happily married, then he has it better than a whole lot of other Americans, especially those in the public light, and I salute him.
Yeah, I am kinda thinking like walterc #51 20 yrs?? emmmm, I don’t know… yeah he did wrong & should be punished, but why was this allowed to go on for 20 years? Makes me wonder, who does he know.
I have the ut-most respect for Mr. Thomas. He beats the daylights out of bho and his wifeee. A person of ‘color’ can be a human being without trying to degrade everyone else who is not their color. I thank God Mr. Thomas is on the SC. He is a has intellegence I wish I had. I would vote for him for President, but not bho.
L
As far as I’m concerned anyone who has problems with interracial marriage or the offspring of such a marriage are doing nothing more than carrying their own problematic baggage. I’ve been married to a woman of a different color, ethnic group, language and culture for more than 26 years and the only problems we’ve had that stemmed from any of these aspects were strictly in the realm of language and culture (the same kinds of problems we had when living in countries neither of were native to).
Ron, spare me your umbrage. and after you collected yourself from your temper tantrum, the irony slipped right your over your dunce hat.
hehe. you mean aside from the fact that a mixlet isn’t an animal? a 4 year old could have, at least, made that observation. a ‘zebra’ also presents a pictorial - unless zebras come in different colors, this automatically means black/white. i never assigned “mixlet” a race, you did…your bigotry kicked right in. not only did you automatically assume i was referring to black/white, you gave an analogy attempting to drive you point home, only to fail to realize you exposed your ignorance. and you have the audacity to call someone else an idiot.
i don’t even need to respond to the rest of your BS. you’ve made your point clear.
Ms. Malkin, you are absolutely right that we must work together to eradicate racial hatred and ignorance.
However, I am not encouraged when I see comments made by a commenter named “feeler” ON THIS SITE just two days ago:
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/08/texas-student-attacked-for-her-anti-illegal-immigration-homework/#comment-281774
Not one person in the rest of thread condemned that remark, despite the fact that it was filled with intolerance.
Can we agree that these type of unsubstantiated claims about racial groups is not to be tolerated (here or anywhere)?
bloghooligan says:
If you will go back to my original comment on this thread you will see that I specified that I was only talking about blacks and whites. You should read more than your own post. They aren’t that good.
and if you went back to the first comment about “mixlets” i wasn’t responding to you. was i? in fact, it was SPECIFICALLY addressed to someone specific. but the world revolves around you. who’s the idiot?
YOU assigned ‘race’ to the term “mixlet” you bigot. do you at least acknowledge that a mixlet isn’t an animal? again, who’s the idiot?
and i would suggest you ask people to NOT read your first comment. after this exchange, it suddenly all makes sense…who the idiot is between us.
I can agree that unsubstantiated claims about racial groups should not be tolerated, but I’m wondering what unsubstantiated claims you are talking about? If you are talking about the “Yet today’s black people hold NO responsibility for crimes against whites” then I agree because that is just another version of “[fill-in-the-blank] people all think/are/act alike.” If you are talking about the “for the one-hundred white women they rape EACH DAY here in America alone?” then the only thing unsubstantiated is the “EACH DAY” part, because according to the DOJ the annual total in 2005 was 37,460 — which, BTW, averages out to be around 102.6 per day.
Thank you Don Miguel for posting that response. I just looked at the DOJ document.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf
The information is located on page 30.
I stand corrected that feeler’s claim was unsubstantiated of on average, one hundred white women are raped by black men each day.
The average worked out to 135 per day by white men and 102 for African American men. I am sure these are crimes that are reported and verified?
I will disagree with the claim that black people hold “no responsibility” for crimes committed today. Rapes should not be tolerated no matter what race or color. I believe that the African American community does know that crime levels must decrease and we must all work together to reach that goal.
Many moonbats have told me that racist beliefs like Tuason’s are evidence that the holder of such beliefs is a right-wing Republican. They seem to believe a caricature of conservatives as deranged and bitter. Hmmm, Obama seems to agree with the moonbats.
re: marrying someone of another race means you are rejecting your own.