<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notice:  U.S. WMD Retaliation Doctrine Has Changed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neoconservatives&#8211;Not New and Not Conservative&#8211;American Empire Interventionists &#171; Pronk Palisades</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-456488</link>
		<dc:creator>Neoconservatives&#8211;Not New and Not Conservative&#8211;American Empire Interventionists &#171; Pronk Palisades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-456488</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Thinky Linky: the UnRealists</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-431495</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Thinky Linky: the UnRealists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-431495</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;realists&#8221;&#8211;who are &#8220;fighting for John McCain&#8217;s soul&#8220;&#8211; include perennial See-Dub irritant Richard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;realists&#8221;&#8211;who are &#8220;fighting for John McCain&#8217;s soul&#8220;&#8211; include perennial See-Dub irritant Richard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; So where&#8217;s the coverage of Armitage?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-356341</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; So where&#8217;s the coverage of Armitage?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-356341</guid>
		<description>[...]  {Post by See-Dubya. More about Armitage and the realists here.}  Posted in: 2008 campaign, GOP, John McCain, Media Bias  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  {Post by See-Dubya. More about Armitage and the realists here.}  Posted in: 2008 campaign, GOP, John McCain, Media Bias  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Bush&#8217;s new faith-based North Korean nuclear proliferation policy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-291990</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Bush&#8217;s new faith-based North Korean nuclear proliferation policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-291990</guid>
		<description>[...] this is exactly what their candidates would do.) This undoes any goodwill and confidence the new WMD retaliation policy might have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this is exactly what their candidates would do.) This undoes any goodwill and confidence the new WMD retaliation policy might have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leatherneck</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283971</link>
		<dc:creator>Leatherneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283971</guid>
		<description>We have been hit with a WMD from Mexico. Between 15-30 million illegal aliens have managed to close down Hospitals, over flow our jails, and murder how many Americans?

Take Mexico&#039;s oil for pay back, but that would mean the price of gas would go down. Does big oil want that? Will Bush slam Mexico for it&#039;s WMD attack on us? I think not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been hit with a WMD from Mexico. Between 15-30 million illegal aliens have managed to close down Hospitals, over flow our jails, and murder how many Americans?</p>
<p>Take Mexico&#8217;s oil for pay back, but that would mean the price of gas would go down. Does big oil want that? Will Bush slam Mexico for it&#8217;s WMD attack on us? I think not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valiant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283829</link>
		<dc:creator>Valiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283829</guid>
		<description>Neocons are big government, nation-building commies.  Bolton is not a neocon. Bush and McCain are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neocons are big government, nation-building commies.  Bolton is not a neocon. Bush and McCain are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emjem24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283772</link>
		<dc:creator>emjem24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283772</guid>
		<description>zorro said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;On April 10th, 2008 at 11:20 am, 30 pcs of silver said:
But an ounce of prevention beats a megaton of retaliation.

Hear, hear. And should keep our “friends” the lefties happy. Right?
I’m all for it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wish I had your &quot;faith.&quot; Unfortunately, if there is a Dem administration, they will likely bury their heads in the sand, pull out troops in Iraq, or pretend Al Qaeda doesn&#039;t exist like Bill Clinton did. When they see the mushroom cloud I wonder what their reaction will be:

1) The nihilists will scream with joy.
2) The &quot;pragmatists&quot; or Dems in Denial will push their heads deeper into the scorched earth.

I hope I&#039;ll be in a bunker if this circumstance should ever occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zorro said: </p>
<blockquote><p>On April 10th, 2008 at 11:20 am, 30 pcs of silver said:<br />
But an ounce of prevention beats a megaton of retaliation.</p>
<p>Hear, hear. And should keep our “friends” the lefties happy. Right?<br />
I’m all for it.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wish I had your &#8220;faith.&#8221; Unfortunately, if there is a Dem administration, they will likely bury their heads in the sand, pull out troops in Iraq, or pretend Al Qaeda doesn&#8217;t exist like Bill Clinton did. When they see the mushroom cloud I wonder what their reaction will be:</p>
<p>1) The nihilists will scream with joy.<br />
2) The &#8220;pragmatists&#8221; or Dems in Denial will push their heads deeper into the scorched earth.</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;ll be in a bunker if this circumstance should ever occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News » Thursday Bucket o&#8217; News</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283707</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News » Thursday Bucket o&#8217; News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283707</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin » Notice: U.S. WMD Retaliation Doctrine Has Changed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin » Notice: U.S. WMD Retaliation Doctrine Has Changed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie's Notebook</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283636</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie's Notebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283636</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jeremiah Wright - Hamas - CAIR: Is there a Connect...&lt;/strong&gt;

UPDATE TO... I came across some posts that are linking to jpegs to more of Dr. Jeremiah Wright&#039;s church bulletins, showing Dr. Wright&#039;s copyright....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jeremiah Wright &#8211; Hamas &#8211; CAIR: Is there a Connect&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>UPDATE TO&#8230; I came across some posts that are linking to jpegs to more of Dr. Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s church bulletins, showing Dr. Wright&#8217;s copyright&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bear1909</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283626</link>
		<dc:creator>bear1909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283626</guid>
		<description>Re BitBoy #7&lt;blockquote&gt;Might we also assume neocons talk big and do nothing and pragmatists capitulate and do nothing. It seems once Bush formulated the Bush Doctrine he wanted no part of it. For these past eight years we have suffered an administration that can’t even build a Duncan Hunter caliber fence to secure our southern border and still does not know the source of radical fundamental Muslims (but then who is the enemy). Neocon or pragmatists, here it comes again in McSame and what might we expect the results to be.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The day by day blow by blow picture might obscure the larger picture accomplishment of the Bush Doctrine in Iraq.

20,000 dead al Qaeda is nothing to scoff at.  Iraq is producing more oil than it has than at any time in its history.  Mookie al-Fritata&#039;s power is leeching faster than fertilizer into the Mississippi.  And the American military has significant presence on the Asian subcontinent for the first time since, when, forever?  

Sometimes we civilians look at an admin on a media time scale wondering &quot;what have you done for me today?&quot;  yet, the slow plodding pace of a civilian government&#039;s foreign policy and coordination of a complex military may require we look at things on a different scale.

Bush will go down for what was accomplished in Iraq and how many of Beanie Lah-Dinsky&#039;s  guys he killed.

And in the process frustrated the political Left in this country from framing the debate in Vietnam style terms.....that strategy has been completely discredited.

It is the nature of conservative politics to take a bite out of a problem and then chew it forever before taking another bite.  

I am curious to see Dubya&#039;s parting gift to the Jihadists here in this country--- a massive roundup of mosque roaches perhaps?  massive freezing of bank accounts?  and whatever happened to CAIR?  will the Muslim Brotherhood finally be purged out of the CIA and the NSA?

lots to hold on about.  the good guys are rolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re BitBoy #7<br />
<blockquote>Might we also assume neocons talk big and do nothing and pragmatists capitulate and do nothing. It seems once Bush formulated the Bush Doctrine he wanted no part of it. For these past eight years we have suffered an administration that can’t even build a Duncan Hunter caliber fence to secure our southern border and still does not know the source of radical fundamental Muslims (but then who is the enemy). Neocon or pragmatists, here it comes again in McSame and what might we expect the results to be.</p></blockquote>
<p>The day by day blow by blow picture might obscure the larger picture accomplishment of the Bush Doctrine in Iraq.</p>
<p>20,000 dead al Qaeda is nothing to scoff at.  Iraq is producing more oil than it has than at any time in its history.  Mookie al-Fritata&#8217;s power is leeching faster than fertilizer into the Mississippi.  And the American military has significant presence on the Asian subcontinent for the first time since, when, forever?  </p>
<p>Sometimes we civilians look at an admin on a media time scale wondering &#8220;what have you done for me today?&#8221;  yet, the slow plodding pace of a civilian government&#8217;s foreign policy and coordination of a complex military may require we look at things on a different scale.</p>
<p>Bush will go down for what was accomplished in Iraq and how many of Beanie Lah-Dinsky&#8217;s  guys he killed.</p>
<p>And in the process frustrated the political Left in this country from framing the debate in Vietnam style terms&#8230;..that strategy has been completely discredited.</p>
<p>It is the nature of conservative politics to take a bite out of a problem and then chew it forever before taking another bite.  </p>
<p>I am curious to see Dubya&#8217;s parting gift to the Jihadists here in this country&#8212; a massive roundup of mosque roaches perhaps?  massive freezing of bank accounts?  and whatever happened to CAIR?  will the Muslim Brotherhood finally be purged out of the CIA and the NSA?</p>
<p>lots to hold on about.  the good guys are rolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bear1909</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283610</link>
		<dc:creator>bear1909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283610</guid>
		<description>Use nuclear attack subs to plant one on Mecca.  The game would stop there.  Brutes only understand brute force.  Plus these Jihadists are not loved by the general Muslim population---- look what happened in Iraq.  I am sure the folks in Lebanon arent finished digging out from under the Hezbollah &quot;victory&quot; yet, while NOT singing the praises of their &quot;benefactors&quot;.

Level it.  Before they strike.  Because we have it on good authority (Ahmedinejad) that  &quot;Ya&#039;ll were going to Nuke Israel.&quot;  

Condi&#039;s strategy has been completely discredited. Bush should act before he leaves office.  Let AmabO Hussein clean up the ashes.  I mean it would qualify as &quot;Change&quot; wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use nuclear attack subs to plant one on Mecca.  The game would stop there.  Brutes only understand brute force.  Plus these Jihadists are not loved by the general Muslim population&#8212;- look what happened in Iraq.  I am sure the folks in Lebanon arent finished digging out from under the Hezbollah &#8220;victory&#8221; yet, while NOT singing the praises of their &#8220;benefactors&#8221;.</p>
<p>Level it.  Before they strike.  Because we have it on good authority (Ahmedinejad) that  &#8220;Ya&#8217;ll were going to Nuke Israel.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Condi&#8217;s strategy has been completely discredited. Bush should act before he leaves office.  Let AmabO Hussein clean up the ashes.  I mean it would qualify as &#8220;Change&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publiuswarmac9999</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283603</link>
		<dc:creator>publiuswarmac9999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283603</guid>
		<description>This amounts to a pre-declaration of WW-III.  The only likely suspects to attack the USA using WMDs are Hezbollah, al queda, Hamas, and some other Islamic terror group.  This policy says to these organizations and their state sponsors what we said to the Soviets when the mutually assured destruction policy was in place - you hit use with a nuke and we will respond with a nuke.

This is clearly a shot across the bow - and constitutes an ounce of prevention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This amounts to a pre-declaration of WW-III.  The only likely suspects to attack the USA using WMDs are Hezbollah, al queda, Hamas, and some other Islamic terror group.  This policy says to these organizations and their state sponsors what we said to the Soviets when the mutually assured destruction policy was in place &#8211; you hit use with a nuke and we will respond with a nuke.</p>
<p>This is clearly a shot across the bow &#8211; and constitutes an ounce of prevention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain&#8217;s Foreign Policy Advisors &#171; The Political Inquirer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283585</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain&#8217;s Foreign Policy Advisors &#171; The Political Inquirer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283585</guid>
		<description>[...] NYT link I found in this rather scary article about quiet policy changes going on; changes directly related to my first Gray Zone posting.  These are real concerns and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NYT link I found in this rather scary article about quiet policy changes going on; changes directly related to my first Gray Zone posting.  These are real concerns and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283584</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283584</guid>
		<description>I am encouraged to see we have a doctrine of counter attacking anyone that hits us with a WMD attack returning the favor with a couple of Kilotons of Nuclear Power, but I doubt if anyone in our Government has the stones to implement it.  McCain really needs to quit surrounding him with pragmatist (panty-waste) advisors and find some realist that understand the nature of our enemies (foreign and domestic) and the threat they are to this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am encouraged to see we have a doctrine of counter attacking anyone that hits us with a WMD attack returning the favor with a couple of Kilotons of Nuclear Power, but I doubt if anyone in our Government has the stones to implement it.  McCain really needs to quit surrounding him with pragmatist (panty-waste) advisors and find some realist that understand the nature of our enemies (foreign and domestic) and the threat they are to this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnr</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-283569</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/10/notice-us-wmd-retaliation-doctrine-has-changed/#comment-283569</guid>
		<description>Bolton for Secretary of State 

*watches dhimicrat heads explode*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolton for Secretary of State </p>
<p>*watches dhimicrat heads explode*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

