Feds to start deporting criminals first!

By see-dubya  •  April 11, 2008 02:57 PM

{Guest post by See-Dubya}

Are the Feds catching a clue?

The recently announced ICE effort, known as “Secure Communities,” will upgrade computer technology in jails and allow local jailers to access ICE’s fingerprint database to quickly identify prisoners with immigration violations as they are booked. The $200 million in funding already allocated for the program this year would also add an unspecified number of ICE detention and removal officers, Counts confirmed.

The program would also:

• Prioritize removal of criminal immigrants based on their danger to the community.

• Expand an early parole program for non-violent immigrants who agree to deportation.

Sounds good to me. There’s some discussion of the cost of the initiative (a billion) and also a secure-borders guy claiming that hardened criminals should serve out their sentences before they’re deported. There’s a point there, because without a secure border, they can come right back over and will have effectively enjoyed a “criminal illegal alien early-release program”. I hope the “prioritizing” of these deportations focuses on, for example, murderers who are arrested for a misdemeanor and would be back on the street in a matter of days if they’re not deported immediately. As for convicted felons already serving time in prison, well, the damage is done. Make a note, let them serve out most of their sentence and then have a plane waiting to take them home the day of their release.

Unless the state decides differently. States may be tired of paying for the incarceration of illegal immigrant criminals and want to send them on home. If states want to do that, it’s their business.

I look at the cost issue this way: illegal alien criminals are in state jails because the Federal government failed in its obligation to secure and defend the border. Especially these repeat offenders who should have been thrown out and kept out. The burden should be on the Feds to pay the bill if someone gets back through and commits a crime, and the state has to arrest them.

(Hat tip to DRJ for that one.)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Feds to deport illegal alien criminals? | The TIW Blog
  2. Criminal Illegal Aliens to be Deported First:

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #284534
    On April 11th, 2008 at 2:58 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    Government efficiency…..oxymoron

    Don’t bet on it!

  2. #284536
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:00 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    • Prioritize removal of criminal immigrants based on their danger to the community.

    Sounds like a loophole to be exploited by the open borders crowd.

    I’m cynical about promises of “enforcement”, but it would be great if we actually move in that direction.

  3. #284540
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:03 pm, yt1300inHtown said:

    Be sure to take away their hacksaws too.

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/5693543.html

  4. #284541
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:04 pm, emjem24 said:

    Wow, and it only took them about a couple of generations to figure out! :shock:

    The initiative sounds simple enough I’m sure the Feds will find some way to screw it up and add more “pork” to it until the original goal gets lost in all the confusion. :roll:

    Here’s another idea: if the technology is there how about we put some kind of identity chip into these criminal aliens and have a scanning system in place so that we know who they are at all times. Maybe then these illegal invaders would get the message that, no matter how desperate you are for a better life, please enter the US legally. If you do not… you’ll wish you had. :mad:

  5. #284542
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, bloghooligan said:

    *in my best condescending Cartman tone*

    There you go…

  6. #284544
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:08 pm, rooster said:

    “Show me the money results”

  7. #284548
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    $200 million? That’ll get them what – 200 computers?

  8. #284549
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:12 pm, ezupirate75 said:

    Care to start a pool on how long it takes the ACLU to challenge this in court. I am in for May 1, 2008.

  9. #284552
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:15 pm, letget said:

    Does this mean the families of the criminals will be deported also? Probably not if there is a kid born here. They are American citizens, our government says so.
    L

  10. #284564
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:27 pm, letget said:

    S/B Does this mean the families, if illegal, of the criminals will be deported also?
    L

  11. #284566
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:34 pm, Rusty said:

    • Prioritize removal of criminal immigrants based on their danger to the community.

    This is perfect. I know it makes me a bleeding heart, but children who were brought over the border and don’t have any family in their home country are in an especially troublesome predicament. Those aren’t the people I want to seen deported.

    However this is a great way to eliminate threats to the community without wasting too much of the taxpayer dime. My issues with illegal immigration stem from criminal (outside of their illegal crossing) illegal aliens being hard to pin down because of their status. They need to go. They deserve top priority for a one way ticket.

  12. #284571
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:41 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    Unless the state decides differently. States may be tired of paying for the incarceration of illegal immigrant criminals and want to send them on home. If states want to do that, it’s their business.

    They should contract with North Korea to house all our illegal immigrant inmates. I’m sure most states can get a bargain basement deal. We can send Jimmy Carter to hammer out the deals of the contract.

  13. #284575
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:44 pm, jcflindsay said:

    $200MM. Let’s see, how fast can Julie Myers blow that? That’s her T & E party budget for one year. Come on!

  14. #284577
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:51 pm, josetheguerilla said:

    This is perfect. I know it makes me a bleeding heart, but children who were brought over the border and don’t have any family in their home country are in an especially troublesome predicament. Those aren’t the people I want to seen deported.

    Boo-freaking-hoo!!!! What do you think Mexico does with it’s illegal immigrants in similar circumstances? THEY deport them ASAP!

  15. #284579
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, walterc said:

    Here’s another idea: if the technology is there how about we put some kind of identity chip into these criminal aliens and have a scanning system in place so that we know who they are at all times.

    My dogs each have one under th eskin, so that any vet (or law enforcement agency) can see where they belong. And if they get lost, we can just do a sat search adn there ya go.

    If we can do it with a legal yellow lab, we can do it with an illegal person.

  16. #284580
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:55 pm, jcflindsay said:

    emjem24 said: …Here’s another idea: if the technology is there how about we put some kind of identity chip into these criminal aliens and have a scanning system in place so that we know who they are at all times.

    Yes! Yes! emjem, I see where you’re going with this. A chip with a micro-explosive device that can be detonated on command. “Si effe. I almost got security clearance just before they caught me.” BLADAAAAAMMMMM!!!!!!!

  17. #284582
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:57 pm, walterc said:

    Here’s another thought. . .how about we release the border patrol agents that we sent to prison for doing their jobs? Two more agents on patrol and two beds opened up for real criminals awaiting deportation.

  18. #284584
    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:59 pm, Nicki said:

    About damned time!

  19. #284588
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:05 pm, letget said:

    #17
    Will Sutton agree with this, doubt it. These two agents and their families have gone through he33 with this mess. My mind can not understand why this is happening. It is hard to understand why any person would want to be a patrol agent with the way their government is treating these two.
    L

  20. #284591
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    I swear I held a conversation just like this last night with BHO….it was a dream. lol Really….I had a dream about discussing illegal immigration with him. OMG!! I was trying to convince him that taking away all the things that draw them to the US would work. He just gave me a smug smile like he was soooo much more intelligent than I am. What was I thinking about when I went to sleep?!?!?!?!?!?!

  21. #284597
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, ajmontana said:

    #20, dip your oreo’s in milk not nyquil before you go to bed.

  22. #284598
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:20 pm, Speakup said:

    The Pres. has been deeply involved all the way with the immigration equations of his tenure.

    Is this a leave’em smiling? Or a leave’em laughing?
    Or is this an economics formula?
    Maybe its to make up for the smashmouth politics Bush gave McCain in 2K.

    Its not because you and I want it, if that were the case, it would have happened long ago.

  23. #284599
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:22 pm, John Ansell said:

    Implanting the chips would be great. Especially for the gang members.

  24. #284601
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:23 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Rusty said:

    This is perfect. I know it makes me a bleeding heart, but children who were brought over the border and don’t have any family in their home country are in an especially troublesome predicament. Those aren’t the people I want to seen deported.

    This is exactly what they are betting on….What kind of person uses their child in defence of their criminal choices.

    I say buh-and bye. Then let their kids back in legally…make them stay behind.

  25. #284605
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, geminicontender said:

    Sounds good!, until the ‘touchy-feely gonna lose my family’ types start yapping. You are still splitting the family up even though one of you has been behind bars for a period of time. Yes, loopholes or Dems will get in the way of this…ACLU, LARAZA and all the other ‘dependents’ of America.

  26. #284613
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:30 pm, emjem24 said:

    jcflindsay said:

    Yes! Yes! emjem, I see where you’re going with this. A chip with a micro-explosive device that can be detonated on command. “Si effe. I almost got security clearance just before they caught me.” BLADAAAAAMMMMM!!!!!!!

    ROTFLMAO!!! :lol:

  27. #284617
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:34 pm, graysonret said:

    Unless we secure the border, what’s the point of deporting these criminals, when they’re right back across the border, before the paperwork is finished? Of course, I’m for any sort of deportation. Every little effort helps, but it’s a “finger in the dam” proposition. They say we can’t deport the millions of illegals here already. We don’t have to. Just make it so inconvenient for them to be here, and they will all go home. Please, first, secure the border!

  28. #284621
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:37 pm, UberInfidel67 said:

    #21…I think it is because we are being bombarded here in PA with campaign commercials and such. It drives me crazy to hear what they say in these commercials when I know damned well what they REALLY mean. It’s getting to me. Also, I am frustrated because we should be shoring up a Republican voter base, but it seems like Dems are registering like crazy. Maybe it was more of a nightmare?

  29. #284630
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:42 pm, beenthere said:

    This program will be among the first thing President Obama cancels, as a budget cutting measure, of course. In English: this program will up and functional when then border fence is.

  30. #284639
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, letget said:

    # 28
    Might I suggest the ‘mute’ button. I do not listen to any of these three. Any of the three comes on, mute. Get 20 or 30 batteries so the mute still works. They all can spend 80 million on PA things, I don’t listen. I feel gobs better.
    L

  31. #284647
    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:00 pm, sdillard said:

    Please! Don’t fall for “the poor children of illegals who are deported” whine. It’s crap.

    Minor citizen children of deported illegal parents can be taken back home with mom. When the kids are 18 they can come back as citizen adults. The alternative is for illegal mom to leave them here, either with relatives or in foster care.

    This is not cruel. This is the result of breaking our laws and thumbing your nose at our sovereignty. Eventually, there will be enough popular support to end the anchor baby nonsense, but we’re not there yet.

    I work for a big city welfare department, folks. We currently have almost ONE THOUSAND cases here of illegal parents with citizen kids. We don’t “aid” the illegal parents, but we aid the kids. But who do you think gets the welfare check? Hint: it isn’t the six year old. Multiply this by 58 counties here in California, paying special attention to LA County with NINE MILLION people and hundreds of thousands of illegals with citizen kids.

    If we don’t get a handle on this now, this state, and yours down the line, will look like, smell like, and be as “liveable” as Mexico.

    I will not consent.

  32. #284652
    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:03 pm, NavyMom said:

    My family has some real in-your-face experience with this. We survived the sexual molestation of our nine year old daughter by a CONVICTED sex offender who was allowed to roam freely. He lived in our neighborhood for years without our knowing he was a pedophile. Following his arrest, conviction and forced relocation out of our neighborhood in 2007, I managed to keep tabs on him via the internet. Much to our surprise, we learned just two days ago that because this was his second conviction for moral turpitude, he had to be deported! Thank God the US Gov’t grew a spine and kicked the creep out. (I’m happy to report that our daughter who is now 13 years old is happy, well adjusted and doing splendidly, thanks to God, our church, and family. She even speaks to her church youth group about how to protect themselves. She is an amazing young lady.)

  33. #284658
    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, emjem24 said:

    Rusty said:

    This is perfect. I know it makes me a bleeding heart, but children who were brought over the border and don’t have any family in their home country are in an especially troublesome predicament. Those aren’t the people I want to seen deported see taking the benefits that American children should have… not them.

    It would be nice if you shared the same kind of “bleeding heart” for the American taxpayer, Rusty. I really don’t feel their plight since they get freebies like public education (which enables/excuses their illegal presence), healthcare, and welfare. Nope, I really don’t feel pride in Latino students who have a free ride in our education system yet don’t take it seriously enough to achieve success or graduate either on time or not at all.

    You see, Rusty, your “poor little darlings” don’t feel they should contribute to the US, only take from it… just like their parents. I’d rather both parent(s) and offspring get a one-way ticket where they can become Mexico’s problem.

    Oh, and another thing: BOO FREAKIN’ HOO!!! :mad:

  34. #284682
    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:26 pm, graysonret said:

    This whole border business has become a sad joke. Oh, the government is doing something, which is the same as doing nothing. What a waste of money and effort.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,350692,00.html

  35. #284690
    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, feebiebabe said:

    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:03 pm, NavyMom said:

    mwah….hugs and kisses to your family.

  36. #284703
    On April 11th, 2008 at 5:43 pm, DaveC said:

    This is perfect. I know it makes me a bleeding heart, but children who were brought over the border and don’t have any family in their home country are in an especially troublesome predicament. Those aren’t the people I want to seen deported.

    My problem is that the children don’t really assimilate.. Legals do.. Illegals.. Don’t..

    However this is a great way to eliminate threats to the community without wasting too much of the taxpayer dime. My issues with illegal immigration stem from criminal (outside of their illegal crossing) illegal aliens being hard to pin down because of their status. They need to go. They deserve top priority for a one way ticket.

    members of MS-13, for example?

  37. #284719
    On April 11th, 2008 at 6:09 pm, in_awe said:

    I just read that California currently pays $46,104 per year per inmate—more than the nation’s per capita income.

    Wanna guess how many are illegals immigrants? Yet our esteemed Democrats in charge of the legislature refuse to deal with the illegal immigration issue…or force the feds to cough up money to pay all or a portion of this enormous annual burden on California taxpayers.

  38. #284728
    On April 11th, 2008 at 6:19 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Wow, what an epiphany!

  39. #284733
    On April 11th, 2008 at 6:20 pm, cf said:

    I hope it continues after the election!

  40. #284754
    On April 11th, 2008 at 6:42 pm, John Ansell said:
  41. #284807
    On April 11th, 2008 at 7:26 pm, Boomer said:

    This sounds like typical election year pandering to me. The current administration has an awful record in protecting our borders as well as the citizens of this country from criminal activities and health risk caused by our unwelcome invaders. Time will tell how the execution is handled by the incompetents of the Department of Homeland Insecurity.

  42. #284817
    On April 11th, 2008 at 7:35 pm, maisy said:

    Until they take down that revolving door on the border this too will be a waste of money made to make them look like they are doing their civic duty…..i’ll believe it when I see it….and I bet you’ll see these people waltz back in as soon as they are sent back…..that is the whole point of the fence and the reason why the politicians are making sure it will not be built.

  43. #284825
    On April 11th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, WarTip said:

    It has been said before but I have to throw in my two cents worth. Unless we secure our border, all of the deportations in the world are not going to solve even one small portion of the problem.

    We are rewarding seditious acts, people who break our laws and politicians who treat us like gum on their shoes. We allow people to celebrate their “rights” when legally they have none. The politicians encourage people to destroy this once great and proud nation by dividing the people and not uniting the people as Americans first.

    They have come to learn that the hardworking Americans that they depend on to be productive and taxpaying members of society will continue to work and continue to pay no matter how bad they are treated. They believe that we will continue in our blind hope that things will get better until they are in complete control and will never have to relinquish their power.

    Of the pols, by the pols and for the pols. The American politicians in my humble opinion, are every bit as crooked as any I have seen around the world. It is just more expensive to buy a local or federal politician here and that remains the only difference from what I have seen.

    Fence? We don’t need no stinking fence!

  44. #284846
    On April 11th, 2008 at 8:04 pm, xler8bmw said:

    #40 Good question!

  45. #284852
    On April 11th, 2008 at 8:13 pm, TMoney said:

    Pander-ama!

    That’s all. If the pandering gets part of the job done – wonderful!

    After the election, it will be ‘let them in, as usual’ and let the citizens foot the bill.

  46. #284854
    On April 11th, 2008 at 8:16 pm, Helene said:

    Yahoo!

    It’s about time. Send them back!

    Right now our culture rewards bad/illegal behavior. Everyone is so “special” that the rules don’t apply. And then we wonder why so many kids grow up to be failures. They can’t write a sentence, respect authority, speak clear English, dress appropropriately, etc. They are angry, frustrated and disruptive and they don’t understand that by following basic rules they can get ahead.

    As a country we need to start showing our kids that the rules apply. We can start by sending back the illegals.
    Yahoo!

  47. #284884
    On April 11th, 2008 at 9:15 pm, Azygos said:

    I would prefer the Running Man sloution to this problem. Put triggers along the border and along random highways for those that fly in or boat.

    Jose manages to get back into Arizona and not trigger the collar driving through Casa Grande and BLAM, problem solved.

    And sdillard I feel your pain here in Mexifornia (Arizona)

  48. #285063
    On April 12th, 2008 at 5:21 am, graysonret said:

    I think (pardon the smoke) that it isn’t all the politicians’ fault that we have the mess we’re in today. Politics reflect what the people want. If these Congressmen get up on podiums and get applause for keeping the borders open, it’s easy to give in to the temptation, especially when votes keep them in office. It’s the reason why democrats haven’t been thrown out of office recently. When they get cheers for raising taxes, ignoring the Constitution, and taking away rights, not to mention re-election, I can’t put 100% of the blame on them. It’s the American people who have failed this country. If they got nothing but “boos” and poor polls in their districts, they would switch their tune real fast. The “dumbing down” of America is working, and the consequences could be fatal for our form of government.

  49. #285076
    On April 12th, 2008 at 7:19 am, gayle said:

    Oh NavyMom, how horrible!

    I could not have been as dignified as you. I would have used the closest gun available.

    I am glad to hear that your daughter is doing ok now. What a fine young lady she is!!!!!

  50. #286536
    On April 14th, 2008 at 11:56 am, rogerbacon said:

    Does this mean an illegal who steals something will get a lighter sentance than an American? If my car is stolen I don’t care what nationality the guy is. I want him to serve some time. Personally I think we should make a penal colony on an island in the south Pacific somewhere and dump them there. If their home country wants them back they can go and pick them up.

  51. #286934
    On April 14th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, mojack420 said:

    On April 11th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, walterc said: #15

    I love that idea just the tracking devise has to be placed in an area where they would be to afraid to cut it back out from. I think you all know where I am suggesting placing the tracking device :)

    And if they cut it out we don’t have to worry about them impregnating anyone after that again. Or having another anchor baby.

    then again the little neck collar thing they had in the movie the running man would also work

  52. #287379
    On April 14th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, DougHagin said:

    Great idea, why didn’t we right-wingers think of this? Oh wait, we did!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The more offensive Newsweek photo of Sarah Palin

November 17, 2009 06:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Friday open thread

November 6, 2009 04:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 1 Trackback

What’s on your teacher’s reading list?

November 2, 2009 05:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Happy Halloween open thread

October 31, 2009 09:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

October 24, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Nobel Peace Prize winner now increases tension in Louisiana

October 15, 2009 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Divider.

Big Nanny Alert: The War on Hamburgers

October 13, 2009 02:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

139 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Food police.


Categories: Adjudication, Deportation Abyss, Uncategorized



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook