WashTimes: McCain’s foreign lobby money flow

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 11, 2008 12:17 PM

A new report from the Washington Times shows that lobbyists who populate the McCain camp are no different than the lobbyists who populate any of the other presidential candidate’s camp. They sell their services to the highest bidder. And that’s the point: Despite his holier-than-thou stance on campaign finance, The Maaaverick is just like everyone else in Washington. Surrounded by other Beltway denizens engaged in business as usual. Like McCain says himself: “I’ll rely on people to judge me by the company that I keep.”

Excerpt:

Two of Sen. John McCain’s top advisers and fundraisers are among several Republican and Democratic presidential campaign officials whose lobbying firms have been paid more than $15 million by foreign governments since 2005.

The firms of McCain senior adviser Charlie Black, who until recently was the chairman of Washington-based BKSH & Associates, and campaign co-chairman Thomas G. Loeffler, who heads the Loeffler Group in San Antonio, received millions of dollars lobbying the White House, Congress and others as agents of nearly a dozen foreign clients in recent years…

…Mr. Black, who chaired BKSH when it received more than $700,000 in fees from foreign entities since 2005, also signed a deal to lobby for the China National Offshore Oil Corp., a state-owned firm that backed out of an $18.5 billion takeover of U.S. oil producer Unocal amid sharp congressional opposition.

In 2005, the House passed a resolution 398-15 calling for a thorough review of the deal and lawmakers from both parties said the prospect of a Chinese state-owned energy company in charge of a U.S. oil producer posed a national security threat.

Mr. Black said he wasn’t working on any campaigns at the time, but he added that he has a personal rule against giving advice to Mr. McCain on any issues in which he has been a lobbyist: “If an issue comes up, I don’t participate in the discussion.”

Saying he resigned from BKSH to spend more time on the McCain campaign, Mr. Black said Mr. McCain is not influenced by lobbyists, including those who have worked or raised money for his campaign.

Mr. Loeffler’s firm has received more than $10 million since 2006 from the Saudi Embassy and the Ministry of Commerce & Industry of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia…

…Other McCain campaign bundlers, who have committed to raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for the candidate, also have received lobbying fees from foreign governments. They include the following:

…Rob Allyn, head of the Dallas-based Allyn & Co., a public relations, advertising and political media firm, who was paid $720,000 by the Mexican government in 2006 to polish its image and call for a guest worker program for millions of Mexican nationals illegally in the United States.

Same old, same old.

Posted in: John McCain

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. In bed with lobbyists « Try 2 Focus

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #284353
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, jcflindsay said:

    snort.

  2. #284355
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:32 pm, jrlingreenbay said:

    Wake me when they report on something most people don’t know…

    Like the presence of Juan Hernandez in the McCain camp – and all he represents.

  3. #284358
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:36 pm, zorro said:

    He’s pathetic and is starting to make Bob Dole’s run for the White House look good in comparison.

  4. #284361
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:41 pm, Regulus said:

    Lobbyists, schmobbyists, who cares? What I want to know is, is that *really* a naked woman in the reflection of Dick Cheney’s sunglasses?

  5. #284373
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, Rinoalert said:

    POS

  6. #284374
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:54 pm, md1964 said:

    One has to wonder how much money from the Mexican Govt and/or the Drug cartels south of the border has wormed it’s way through hands to reach almost all our politicians.

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why any politican with an IQ over 80 would want to sell out America to criminal invaders. and especially strange why Republicans woudl support any part of it, when you know that 99.99999% will be voting Democrap…(If they aren’t already since illegals DO indeed vote in many states).

  7. #284376
    On April 11th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, normsrevenge said:

    “I’ll rely on people to judge me by the company that I keep.”

    now there’s some imagery.. Ouch.

  8. #284379
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    …and the other candidates bowed out to bring unity to the party?

    HHHAAAAHHAAAHHAA

    Forget the nose plugs. How does one go about severing ones olfactory nerve?

  9. #284380
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, Mister P said:

    Thank goodness Michelle, you have not lost your objectivity. Hannity has and his defense of Mc Cain is getting ugly.

  10. #284383
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:10 pm, a crapweasel said:

    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, Mister P said:

    Thank goodness Michelle, you have not lost your objectivity. Hannity has and his defense of Mc Cain is getting ugly.

    That’s because Fascist of feather…

  11. #284389
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:18 pm, nbarry said:

    Is there a way to raise funds for an exhorbitant two-year campaign for the presidency without getting your hands dirty? In the meantime, the only ones getting rich from this marathon are the media and ad agencies. Now, even the chief campaign finance reformer has capitulated to ugly reality.

  12. #284397
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, WarTip said:

    Political partying above we the people once again. Unfortunately, this is now so common that it really is not newsworthy. What should be in the news is the that we the people are still going to vote for any of these criminals.

  13. #284399
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:22 pm, lgm said:

    Obama is the candidate with the least links to lobbyists. He has links (please don’t quote only the first sentence), but less than McCain or Clinton.

  14. #284402
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, a crapweasel said:

    BTW my fascist remark was aimed at McCain and Hannity and not anyone here. :D

  15. #284404
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:25 pm, amerpun said:

    Obama is the candidate with the least links to lobbyists. He has links (please don’t quote only the first sentence), but less than McCain or Clinton.

    Yes, he only has links to hate-mongering pastors, domestic terrorists, major bundlers, indicted land dealers…

  16. #284406
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, amerpun said:

    Oh, and billionaires, hedge fund owners, military contractors who got earmarks by him, trial lawyers, and Wall Street executives.

  17. #284414
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:34 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Mr. Loeffler’s firm has received more than $10 million since 2006 from the Saudi Embassy and the Ministry of Commerce & Industry of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Just two months ago, the firm also signed an agreement with the South Korean Embassy to consult on “legislation affecting Korea’s foreign military sales status and related matters.”

    Since 2005, the firm reported more than $11 million in fees from foreign lobbying clients.

    Legislation pending in the House and Senate would make it easier for South Korea to buy weapons from U.S. companies.
    The Senate bill, sponsored by Sen. Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Republican, has not come up for a vote.

    Soooooo…South Korea has to pay lobbyists to influence the passage of a law which would make it easier for South Korea to buy US-made weaponry. And this is a problem because?

  18. #284418
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:38 pm, TexasTiger said:

    Obama is the candidate with the least links to lobbyists.

    1. Says who?

    2. Even if true, not surprising. Lobbyists are paid to be effective by working with influential members of Congress. That would eliminate the Chauncey Gardiner of the Senate from contact with many lobbyists.

  19. #284422
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:41 pm, emjem24 said:

    lgm said:
    Obama is the candidate with the least links to lobbyists. He has links (please don’t quote only the first sentence), but less than McCain or Clinton.

    I guess you didn’t notice the Washington Post article this morning on who really contributes to Obummer’s campaign. Yeah, he built up his campaign from the grassroots. Unfortunately, there are some billionaires in the mix along with some big organizations (think Moveon.org) who use that nice little thing known as “bundling” to disguise who gave what.

    So those nice lawyers and casino owners don’t count right? Or how about those lovely lobbyists Obummer cuddled up to during his state senate career. :shock:

    Saying Obummer isn’t tied to lobbyist cash (as much) is like him saying he supports personal responsibility in real life and not just on the campaign trail. :roll:

    Yeah, he really is making a change we can believe in… yet it still has that same old “business as usual” stench attached to it. :mad:

  20. #284423
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:42 pm, TXinsider said:

    Rob Allyn covertly managed Vicente Fox’s presidential campaign in Mexico and has been the political strategist for “Republican” trial lawyer groups.

  21. #284430
    On April 11th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, emjem24 said:

    I don’t know why McCain bothered putting his name on that campaign financing bill at all. He had to have known that if he even associated with lobbyists he’d get clobbered over it. He must know that if he’s going to live by the sword, he’ll die by it as well.

    The only upside to this (if you can find one) is who a lot of the big corporations are giving to. I was shocked that General Dynamics gave money to Obummer. While Obummer refutes any favoritism or appearance of conflict of interest regarding certain program pork kickbacks…. the pork for General Dynamics ended up in a bill anyway.

    They’re all the same… it just depends on how much either candidate is getting in terms of lobbyist/corporate donations.

    Will they or won’t they take public funds for the general election?

  22. #284608
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    less than McCain or Clinton.

    He’s younger. Give him time.

  23. #284637
    On April 11th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, dan708 said:

    War Tip #12:

    You’ve got the makings of an idea, there. What would the Repub Party honchos do if there was a nationwide boycott of this election by nearly every registered Repub voter? Would THAT finally wake them up? I fear not; they seem to be beyond help.

  24. #284827
    On April 11th, 2008 at 7:45 pm, Boomer said:

    I wish I could say I wasn’t surprised, but this explains his passion for trying to shove Shamnesty down our throats last summer. No surprise to find the “grumpy old man” is in bed with the lobby industry. Time for a viable new Conservative Party to replace the “Stupid Party” they continue to go the way of the Whigs.

  25. #285041
    On April 12th, 2008 at 2:29 am, WarTip said:

    That would certainly be worth a shot Dan if we can get past the apathy of the vast majority of voters and party-goers who toe the party line (On both sides) no matter what. However, I was thinking more like a new Free State Project and Secession if we could find a legal way to make it happen.

    I doubt it ever will but if I am going to dream, a Constitutional Republic composed of Independent but United States would certainly be a worthy (if not lofty) one to have.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Ugh: McCain & Company melting on cap-and-tax

October 8, 2009 10:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

John McCain goes to war again

April 30, 2009 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

141 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

“AMC, you magnificent channel!”

John McCain’s AIG bailout revisionism

March 17, 2009 12:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Calling bull.

The trouble with Meghan McCain

March 15, 2009 06:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

232 Comments | 34 Trackbacks

Oprah channels ACORN

February 25, 2009 11:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

80 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Sob.

Richard Viguerie responds to McCain’s new PAC

January 8, 2009 03:47 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Just between “friends.”

No, thanks, “my friend”

January 7, 2009 01:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

222 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

McCain wins…

November 13, 2008 09:31 AM by Michelle Malkin

181 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mandate for change.


Categories: John McCain



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook