By popular demand: SNOBwear!
So many readers asked for posters and t-shirts with reader Tennyson’s SNOB-ama photoshop, we teamed up to make them available online.
Buy one for your small-town gun owner, law enforcer, or church-goer. Buy two for your embittered Pennsylvania friends and family. Or send one to your favorite Obama supporter! It’s an elitist thang. They’ll understand:
Posted in: Barack Obama
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- Barack Obama, Pennsylvania Voters and Liberal Elitism | conservativeintelligencer.com
- SnOb-ama Merchandise! « GOP ftw
- Snob: Obama ‘08 « Blogs for McCain
- US Presidential Campaign 2008 - Page 44 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum
- Health Care BS - SNOBAMA & SHRILLARY
- » Snobama
- Church and State
- SNOBama « Buttle’s World
- This Way To « The Reluctant Optimist
- Jules Crittenden » Marx Lite(weight)
- Obama SNOBwear: Timely and Appropriate:
- Balloon Juice
- BizzyBlog » This Guy Is a Kaus on Fire, and He Doesn’t Even Get to the ‘Bitter’ Part
- SNOBama « Blogs 4 Brownback
- Ain’t Nothin But A “E” Thang…….. « TheJOTUS
- Michelle Malkin » Introducing Barack “Arugula” Obama; Update: CafePress says, “No, you can’t”
- Barack Obama’s Bitter Remark Editorial Cartoons « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
- I want one! « Blog de Ford
- Michelle Malkin » YES! The ultimate Obama endorsement!
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I would, but…I’m hoping to forget about this guy after we beat him.
If they were available, I’d buy a dozen SNOB adult diapers for Dick Cavett.
It is simply amazing what the internet can do when a candidate, or anyone for that matter, screws up when the cameras are rolling and the sound in on. The joke used to be that everyone in the future will have their 15 minutes of fame. The 21st century version is that everyone will have their most embarrassing 15 minutes on YouTube — for all the world to watch. Not that it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy — that means you, Mr. Obama. But for anyone contemplating a public career, watch out. I still think no politician today quite gets it yet.
I had instant inspiration for this. It may be what happens to our dollar if Obama gets elected.
Yo, yo, yo, Michelle M.! Wazzup? Why these shirtzzzzzzz only come in white? Word.
I think you and Tennyson have a great product and entrepreneur sprit but you may have infringed on Mr. Obama’s implied copyright. Hope not. Hey new Hope is found!
bit_boy:
Datz audacious!
LOL at the outrage from the right over a man speaking the truth.
It’s interesting that those states with some of the worst economies also have the highest rate of gun ownership and evangelicals.
Made in the USA? That won’t do for SNOBwear. Shouldn’t it read
“Hand-crafted by indigenous artisans in a co-operative that celebrates local cultural values”?
At 2:31 PM, TheOtherSide’s cat walked across the keyboard and typed
Note that the typing cat fell asleep before siting any sources.
I think I see a new shirt and coffee mug in my future. I love it!
The utter hatred of those like otherside and the other liberals on this board never ceases to amaze me. Why do you hate people who own guns and go to church? How does this affect you? What a sad, pathetic life you people must live.
In the end otherside if someone is robbing you, trying to kill you or your children if you have any, you’d be greatful for a neighbor with a gun who could come and save your sorry a$$ from said robber.
Obama and Clinton are appearing at a the “Compassion Forum” in rural Pennsylvania at Messiah College tonight.. CNN has exclusive broadcast rights. 8-9:30 April 13th. My son attended this college and got a very good education at a high price and the relatively new President of the school is taking it on a big left leaning turn. The more conservative head of the school had to retire a few years ago when diagnosed with a brain tumor. Go to http://www.messiah.edu click on Compassion Forum to see topics for discussion…and gag. McCain will apparently not be making it although he was invited.
fluffy:
PTOS wants to see outrage here. I see a group of people laughing at a loser…well two losers: Oh!b♥m♥ andPTOS.What charity gets the money from the sales?
State economies: here & here
Gun Ownership: here
Evangelicals: here
Richest economic states and Competitive index see page 55 for alphabetical list of state rankings.
Could please point me to one of my posts where I display “utter hatred”. Disagreement, yes. In my opinion, most of the hateful and bitterness laden posts on the MM boards come from your side of the aisle.
Sorry, bit-boy. Obama has no implied or other copyright over this type of use of his image. He is a public figure, and running for president at that. He’s fair game.
Other side,
What truth do you hear in Obama’s words? That people in samll towns are a bunch of bitter hicks?
What on earth does gun ownership and evangelical population have to do with being bitter about econimics and politics?
Could you please take another stab at a point, Other Side?
#16:
At the risk of continuing your threadjack, here’s a bitter hate-laden post from a juvenile, small-minded member of your side:
Now let’s get back to having fun at Oh!b♥m♥’s expense!
At 3:08 PM tgusa posted the links that TheOtherSide wouldn’t
PDF Warning
and now, for a properly posted link:
Don’t bring your guns to Maine
Well Otherside, let’s see-you mock conservatives, tell us how stupid we are on a daily basis (or whenever you post) you just hate us. I believe if you review your posts, you will see it is full of hatred and bitterness. You elite snobs all think the same don’t you? Conservatives are stupid people in your opinion but yet you would want someone to protect you if the time came and chances are it’s not going to be BO or any other liberal toad like yourself.
Also, you didn’t answer the question-why do conservatives who go to church and own guns scare you?
Good luck to you waitin’ on answer that probably will never come. My guess is that most lefties and trolls despise those who exercise their constitutional rights.
I’d buy one except I just couldn’t stand to wear/use it…I can’t bring myself to even behold his evil face of socialism. I like my freedom.
Yes, Fluffy, disregard the links I posted before tgusa as they do not conform to your opinion.
Answer the question Otherside, why do people who attend church and own a gun scare you?
To Do List for TheOtherSide
1) Brush up on reading comprehension
2) Post a link to anything
3) Make some attempt to back up specious claims
terrig, fluffy:
Would you like to borrow some Troll-B-Gon?
Here’s a link we can all enjoy.
TOS:
The months of the year that have the highest ice cream consumption also have the highest rates of drownings.
Am I to conclude from that ice cream causes drownings?
So I’ll ask again: What’s your point?
Texas Tiger, I love it!
They don’t. My parents attend church regularly. I grew up in a household where my stepfather owned a handgun. My stepmothers attend a bible study group almost daily. They are conservatives to the core and we have much spirited debate at family gatherings. And they don’t scare me. It is some of the far,far,far righties on boards like these that scare me. Interestingly enough, when I mention to my stepfather that I listen to Hugh Hewitt, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity at times, he laughs…as he too believes they are fearmongeres, handpicking stories to distort reality. And this coming from a man, he believes William F Buckley and Ronald Reagan are just a notch below God.
Hi TT. Great link!
I’m bored, so I am playing with the troll. This one is going to have to come up with some better chops, however.
Maybe if I lived in a state with lax gun laws I could go out and shoot my old Bud cans.
Well you can say your family members are conservative church going, gun owners but I still believe you deep down you don’t like them, you may love them but you probably don’t like them. I also find it funny that you think conservatives get their marching orders from Rush Limbaugh. That’s is a liberal fallacy but one you buy into.
Forgot to add: liberals do have a distorted view of reality though so that makes sense that you listen to Rush and Vannity.
To prove he can threadjack with the best of them?
Q: If Hillary and Oh!b♥m♥ were on a boat in the middle of the ocean and it started to sink, who would be saved?
A: America!
fluff:
Trolls remind me of seagulls. They swoop in, drop a load and fly away. No fun to play with.
Obama’s point was not that ALL small towns are a bunch of “hicks”. His point was that in those small towns deeply affected by economic downturn, people hold on to their belief systems more fervidly. My point is that those states who seemed to be struggling more economically, also tend to have higher rates of gun ownership and religious fervor. Is this relationship categorically true? maybe not, but statistics tend to read that way. An over-generalization, probably. But one that hees some thought.
I will agree that this is probably an unfair generalization. So I guess that I am as guilty of those on these boards that over generalize about the left as well.
Bitter, bitter people. So bitter that it makes them cling to guns and crosses. So bitter that it makes them the “mean” America in Michelle Obama’s world. And I would bet that their bitterness is also the result of being “punished” with children.
If they would just lay off the cheesesteaks and eat more arugula, they may find life a little better. Caviar, anyone? (Oh, to those bitter rubes in small town America, caviar is what you use for bait, only better).
Alright, TOS. I see the heart of my question remains elusive.
I understand what you stated, that there appears to be a higher rate of gun ownership and religious affiliation in states that do poorly economically.
My question is: what does one have to do with the other?
Are you stating that states doing poorly are doing so because people are clinging to what you may feel are outdated concepts?
That they have these higher rates and that they are not on the top economically are un-related facts. You cannot seriously draw one conclusion from the correlation.
As to Obama being a snob, I both listened to and read the transcript of that speach. HE is stating that these states are doing poorly because they are clinging to their institutions that he apparently disagrees with.
What it said:
And how it’s spun:
The point is that a presumptuous POS like Oh!b♥m♥ has no idea what the residents of small towns think. None.
There are probably more guns–well, unregistered guns–antipathy toward others and bitterness in the first five pews of Jeremiad Wright’s church than in the entire state of Pennsylvania.
The problem with Oh!b♥m♥ is that his nose is too high in the air to see anything within fifty meters of his own position.
Thus the t-shirt.
So would bitterness account for this inventing Aids to kill blacks conspiracy? Is BHO trying to lose? I know he has been projecting how the left feels lately he has been quick to give us lessons on raising children that only a mental midget would need. He seems to believe that this feeling is prevalent throughout America. His whole campaign gives me the feeling that America is bad, on the other hand militant islamist states and groups are not so bad. Don’t exactly know how you end up thinking this way but I will bet you can’t fix it without an intervention by a trained and experienced psychiatrist. My suggestion to BHO…put down those rev wright video cassettes once in awhile.
The bottom line is that Oh!b♥m♥–despite his affirmative-action education–is too dumb to realize that he doesn’t have to worry about winning over unemployed, armed, racist xenophobes. He has already locked up that demographic in every inner-city precinct in the country.
Now he just needs to keep his mowf shut.
I’m not sure I could raise that cup to my lips. It would be like the food challenge on “Fear Factor.”
SHoward,
In your analogy of ice cream and drowning, the relationship is quite clear - hot weather.
With the higher rates of gun ownership and religious affilation in states that do poorly ecomonmically, the obivous causal relationship is not there. So, most likely the relationship is because one effects the other. Neither Obama (check your transcript and please cite otherwise) nor I are claiming gun ownership and religious affilation are causing economic downturn, but that economic downturn leads to holding on more firmly to one’s beliefs. Gun ownership and religious affilation have declined nationally over the past few decades, whereas those states fitting the description above, have declined at a slower rate. That leads one to believe that there is some validity in Obama’s statement.
And Obama told you this personally-correct. This sounds like all the other people how have said, “what I really think he meant was ____________________ (fill in the blank).
excuse my dyslexic fingers.
It drinks the punch. It swallows the turd in the bowl.
The left are masters of generalizations so guess you come by it honestly.
As for BHO-I fear this idiot will be our next commander in chief. It will be interesting to see what happens at the military balls when we have to toast the CIC. Funny thing, even though liberals like to say that the military doesn’t like Bush, he always gets a loud and often raucous cheer when we drink to him. Going to the big Army Ball in DC this year-I will let you know if it’s still the same as it was last year and all the previous years. When Clinton was the CIC it was minimal and polite at best.
How ever will this clown deal with all the hicks in small town America. Perhaps TOS can join his staff to help out with all these bitter, stupid, inbred people in their humble opinions.
Just got back from church. I don’t know bout the rest of y’all; but I think I’ll go down in back of the barn and try out my new .45 Colt Defender on some targets made to look like illegal aliens. Got to keep my hand in ya Know.
Oh the irony.
I agree on this one. Leftists are not masters of generalization; they’re masters of their domain.
That was an easy one. My point is that there is only a correlation between gun ownership/religious affiliation and economics.
Ok, you lost me with this statement. What are you saying? That there is no causal relationship, or that there is? Is it Maybe?
Ok, I’ll buy this statement as one of exact fact. The problem is one of implication. I cannot go back and re-read his words (already stated above by another commenter) without getting the distinct impression that what I have stated is his intended meaning.
Again, unless you can provide some better evidence than changing rates, your point isn’t quite valid, and neither is his. At best, one can say it deserves more study.
Unless, ofcourse, this turns out to be a “so what” moment. In other words, OtherSide, what does it matter? Obama’s statement was one of absolute arrogance and a complete disregard for people he does not relate to. He’s a Chicago elitist, and he always will be, no matter where he goes politically.
Me thinks all those chicken lickin’ Bible huggin’ gun totin’ hicks will be in line for serious deprogramming if Comrad Obama gets in. Unless you can prove you’ve been deprogramed start lining up folks. Michelle O’ same as said so.
The competition for this year’s Dean Scream Moment Award is heating up.
Amen to that Texas Tiger!
Yup, still stand by that one. Anyone who makes fun of people dying from AIDS is an asshole. Carry on.
I just want to point out something relavent to the Photoshop job, here.
Political satire like this is not new (for those that think we’ve reached new lows). This is a great job of campaign artwork.
Many years ago we used to see some very raucus editorial cartoons during the campaign season. We also had slogans that today would land someone in front of some kind of human rights hearing.
If memory serves, Thomas Jefferson was once called The Antichrist during a campaign.
There is nothing new under the sun.
I’d like one of the mugs, but I, like some previous commenters, just don’t know if I can put Obama’s mug (pun intended) to my lips.
SHoward, unfortunately past campaigns don’t seem to be taught in school anymore. I guess it’s not “touchy-feely” enough.
Many years ago I remember learning about the Jefferson/Burr campaign and the 1860,64 campaigns as well. You’re right to point this out as it’s something we tend to forget.
I think I will wait till they come out with the Obama sponge. Garronteed to clean up any mess and leave a bright shiny finish.
What’s really disturbing to me is that Obama, or ANY candidate, would make gun rights an issue on the campaign trail. As I recall, we ended that debate when we wrote the Second Amendment. Am I wrong?
As to the rest of Obama’s statement, people don’t cling to faith because of a poor economy, they have faith in God despite a bad economy. We don’t turn away from when times are good - at least, we shouldn’t.
Also, for the umpteen-millionth time, “anti-immigrant” is not “anti-illegal immigrant!” There’s a fundamental and profound difference between the two; namely, respect for the rule of law. Why should we trust people to abide by our laws once they’re here, when they’re willing to break our laws to enter this country in the first place?
And lest Obama, TheOtherSide, or any other liberal accuse poor, rural Pennsylvanians of not trusting people who don’t “look like them,” I would direct your attention to Obama’s black church. And Affirmative Action. And the United Negro College Fund. And the NAACP. Black This. Negro That. Colored, Black, Negro . . . tell me again, who is it that cares about people who don’t “look like them?”
Au contraire, mon frere. The Obama sponge, while appearing to clean up any issues with ease, only smears it around, and covers it up with a dark stain, so as to make you forget about the real mess underneath.
Shame on you Muckie. Bad, bad Muckie.
I’m tempted to brush it off with a “boys will be boys” dismissal.
Is this something you’d want your father to read, Muckie?
#61, That’s Madison avenue for ya!
Better believe that.
Great products Michelle, I thinking of applying for a kiosk permit at the Pepsi Center to sell them! (just kidding, I’m allergic to liberals).
Obama is not the exception among Dems. Many are snobs, many are bitter. Obama’s church is full of bitter, angry, and ignorant people. Perhaps that’s how he reached his conclusion that religion is the refuge of the disenfranchised. Watch the political “analysts” on Fox or any other cable outlet - the Dems rarely smile, in fact they usually seem droll and unhappy. Consider the mortitician-like Alan Colmes on Hannity & Colmes.
My father would agree with me, TexasToast. Let’s not forget what it was that you poster that brought on my response.
I’ve been reading this thread with some interest, especially TOS’s attempt to rationalize BHO’s statements.
Basically here’s what I have come away with.
In essence what BHO and TOS are saying is that if government does a proper job of cradle to grave state nannism to placate the masses and make everything all better then Americans don’t need God or values, that we can just do away with all that because government will be the end all of every ones desires.
Kinda scary ain’t it?
In reply to TOS’s assertion that states with higher rates of gun ownership/evangelical affiliation have poorer economies, I beg to differ.
TOS’s data for states’ poor economic performances was GDP per capita. A misleading indicator since the states with the highest GDPs per capita are (mostly) among the most expensive to live in. Check this map http://www.missourieconomy.org/indicators/cost_of_living/index.stm and compare it to TOS’s.
Would you rather have 100K annual income in Raleigh or San Francisco? Bismark or NYC? Houston or Portland (OR or ME)?
Michelle, you surely must understand elistism. You went to Oberlin College (a mini-Ivy League school) and probably got in because of affirmative action.
So, did a white male lose his future because of you?
OldGuy53,
You hit a particularly troubling nail right on the head. I am reminded of James Clavell’s “The Children’s Story,” when the new teacher taught the children that praying to their “Leader” got them something while praying to God didn’t.
CJ,
Your point is most timely, as well. I tried to get TOS to explain an actual cause/effect between those two disparate facts, and he didn’t. I don’t believe anyone could, because it is not there.
“jim m,”
I asked you to clarify in another thread, and you seem to have done so here. I’ll ask directly: are you stating that Michelle Malkin is an elitist? What exactly are you saying?
Yes. I believe Michelle Malkin is an elitist. She just tries to pretend she is not.
Jim M, did you not get into Oberlin or any other college? I’m just asking because of your statement: So, did a white male lose his future because of you?
There are plenty of colleges and universities in this country? Were you just pinning your hopes on Oberlin?
jim m,
OK, I went back and found you had answered in the other thread, so sorry for being redundant.
Now, care to elaborate on what leads you to this conclusion?
I mean, the thread we’re on now is a repudiation of elitism. It’s her site that posted it. She’s also pointed out many instances of elitism in the past, and about a veritable plethora of politicians, pundits and overall snobby walking wastes of oxygen.
So what does she do that is elitist?
jim m is the perfect example of the left
I only wish that was a good thing
You know Jim M, I have two brothers who are attorneys. One went to Dartmouth and Northwestern School of Law, the other went to USF-Tampa (like his big sister) and to John Marshall. Guess which one makes more money? That’s right the public school kid. Not everyone can get into their school of choice but if you decided your life was over then and there, well you have no one to blame but yourself. As my other brother found out, IVY League educations do not always equate into mega bucks.
You have it entirely wrong, The Other Side. Everyone but fellow elites can see right through Barack Hussein Obama. Hussein Obama looks at himself as an elite foreigner who grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii, went to the best private schools, attended Ivy League Schools, is the religion-chic (Islam), has an elitist view of Christianity (liberation theology), and finally is a Marxist, the ultimate in elitism. He is about as American as someone like Pol Pot, and has a strikingly similar background of these types of people(moderately wealthy, elite schools, scholarships, disdain for his fellow countrymen).
Let’s PLEASE hope Snobama Hussein makes it at least to get the Democratic nomination, and that his elite, foreign views don’t completely bring the foreigner Snobama down beforehand.
Nice try, Jim. Elitism isn’t defined by your education or income, just as class isn’t. It is by your views. Conservatives are not elitists; liberals always are. Want proof? Why are Hollywood bimbos almost always liberals?
terrig (#73), that’s jim m., Jim M..
jim m. said:
C’mon, are you just trying to be provocative? Oberlin? mini-Ivy League? Really? What’s the criteria for that assessment? If you’re going to be provocative, at least be relevant.
I love the back and forth when it avoids the ad hominem attacks and sticks to reasoned arguments.
As for this:
Why bring Mr. Malkin into the debate?
(I kid, Michelle. I’m sure he couldn’t be happier.)
not Jim M., oops.
terrig,
“Jim M” is a force for good. The guy posting in this thread is “jim m,” his evil twin.
I know you’d have caught it sooner or later, but “Jim M” already mentioned it on the thread where “jim m” first appeared and implied our hostess was an elitist.
I apologize to Jim M, I meant jim m. Sorry all-I’ve got the little one here saying he doesn’t want to take a bath even though it looks like he already had a mud bath today. He just came back from a birthday party and is covered in cake and going nuts with the sugar.
April 10, 2008
Obama’s Linguistic Trap
By Lee Cary
Over at American Thinker is a real good indication as to how Obambi thinks, because like he said “words have meaning”.He, even more than his rival, will try to convince you that what you thought he said was not really what you thought he meant simply because you misunderstood it.
Obama seems to be more of a silver spoon populist, which means he fumbles a lot trying to explain the typical American, which, granted, he is not.
Elitism seems to be a characteristic of the elected political class in a representative democracy. In that regard, Obama can be considered elitist, but, fortunately, he doesn’t have the legislative record to prove it.
One only needs to point out that Sen Jim Bunning was the ONLY person to vote against a mortgage (bank) bailout in the name of saving homeowners to see the odd pairing of voter-buying populism with nanny-state political elitism shared by both sides of the aisle.
But to respond to the original post: it is a funny shirt, even if the sentiment is a bit off the mark. I’d wear it just to annoy my liberal friends.
US News ranks Oberlin College the 20th best liberal arts college in the US in its 2008 rankings–just a few points down from Vassar and Colgate. It was closer to 15th place in the 1990s. That is mini-Ivy League to me.
Actually, I did get into my schools of choice.
Play the fool Mookie.
I didn’t realize you were thirteen until your juvenile posting.
If you can’t handle jokes about vodka, keep it to your self. If you can’t handle jokes about AIDS, don’t rent Team America: World Police.
If you lost a boyfriend to AIDS, accept my condolences.
Since it’s Sunday, out of respect for the grownups, please contain your vulgarities.
Okay jim m, why whine? Unless like every other liberal that’s the only thing you know how to do? Why all the hate? But again that’s a liberal trait isn’t it.
Granted not a large sample, but when I lived in NYC the only people that I knew that had guns were the ultra liberals. They lived in fear of losing some of their material goods.
MY skin is light mocha brown.
Growing up in rural South Jersey, it always seemed darker than it really was. To the pink-necked bigots who couldn’t tell Philadelphia from the Philippines, the light mocha brown skin of the Maglalang family and the caramel skin of the Patel family and the deep ebony skin of the Jackson family were indistinguishable. We were all equal, all right. Equally non-white. Equally “Niggers.”
On a recent vacation, my naturally burnished hide once again invited the kind of circus-freak scrutiny I’d grown indifferent to since childhood. A genteel lady from rural Virginia had been chatting vacuously with my husband (who happens to be a person of pallor). When I joined him casually and slipped my hand in his, the curious belle interrupted herself to squint closely at my brown visage. In the lilting, exaggerated manner of a civilized explorer trying to
communicate with a deaf barbarian, she asked me: “AND . . . WHAR . . . ARE . . . YEW . . . FRUM?”
I’ve been called every racial epithet in the book. But whites aren’t the only ones who pass ill judgments based on color.
Within my own ethnic group - within my own family - there is shade-based bigotry. Back in the Philippines, upscale restaurants refuse to hire natives with skin darker than sand. The movie industry promotes model “mestizos” and “Maria Claras” - pale as paper due to the blanching effect of Spanish blood. Lighter-skinned cousins mocked me as “The Brownie.” Pitying aunties suggested rubbing my skin with pumice stones for a more desirable complexion.
So it comes as no small surprise to learn that Asian Americans like myself are now considered non-minorities of non-color in the press. A news article last week on minority admissions at the University of California referred to “students of color” on the one hand - and “Asians and whites” on the other.
In a recent editorial decrying California’s Proposition 209 and Washington state’s Initiative 200, The Seattle Times referred to the “precipitous drop in minority admissions” in California as a result of abolishing racial preferences.
Numerous stories further reported that “minority admissions” had plummeted at UC Berkeley by 61 percent. The Times and other leading opponents of I-200 warn ominously that what’s happening on California campuses could happen here if the measure passes in November.
But what’s really happening?
As UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh points out, the total percentage of racial minority students at Berkeley - including Asians - actually fell from 57 percent to 49 percent, not by 61 percent. And, Volokh observed: “The drop was exclusively among blacks, Latinos and American Indians. Asians, who make up less than 10 percent of the California population, apparently aren’t a minority.’”
Whitewashing Asians out of the post-209 college admissions equation allows for simpler, more inflammatory rhetoric. Thus, The Seattle Times can look at California and conclude that proponents of race-neutral policies in Washington state want to “preserve preferences of greatest advantage to white males and to eliminate those that benefit women and racial and ethnic minorities.” Never mind that abolishing racial preferences in higher ed led to a 16 percent increase in admissions for Asians and Pacific Islanders at Boalt Law School in Berkeley, and a 18 percent increase at UCLA Law School.
Out of political expedience, “minority” has been redefined by racial-preference promoters. It is no longer an objective statistical category, but an ideological status. Members of minority groups who have overcome barriers to success - and who oppose being tallied by race - are no longer viewed as people with valuable heritages, diverse life experiences, or raw memories of discrimination and prejudice. They are effectively “white” and simply don’t count.
A sad irony of the battle over racial preferences here in Washington is that many of the leaders wielding exclusionary paintbrushes are Asian Americans themselves. With a great deal of moral smugness and zeal, they too are echoing calls to defend Washington against the California “threat” of race neutrality. In the name of diversity, they share President Clinton’s concern that race-free, merit-based admissions could lead to universities filling “their entire freshmen classes with nothing but Asian Americans.”
Unbelievable. Never could I have imagined growing up that I would see the day when brown- and yellow-skinned people would stand on the side of pink-skinned bigots railing against the problem of too many of “them.” Never could I have imagined that overcoming the encumbrance of colored skin would be treated with contempt and punished with a new
status in society:
Invisible.
Michelle Malkin, “Whitewashing Asians Out of Racial Preference Debate,” Seattle Times, May 26, 1998, at B4.
Being an elitist snob is a state of mind, only an elitist snob would equate where you were educated to how snobby you are.
whenever I see a post by jim m I can only roll my eyes
I like this one too!
Wah jim m, perhaps some counseling is in order. Hate comes in all colors and I believe you’re as racist as Jeremiah the Bullfrog Wright and Robert KKK Byrd.
jim m,
Way to highjack the thread. Do you have any comment on Obama’s elitist mentality, or are you just going to remain in the gutter and hurl insults at our host?
I take it that your vitriol and cyber tantrums relate to the fact that you are the epitome of the Obama supporter who is so conflicted by white guilt or racial animus that you have lost all ability to relate an objective thought about the “Hope-a-Dope”. Obama is an empty suit; a man who is adrift without a teleprompter or rehearsed speech; a man who stands for everything, and at the same time, stands for nothing.
Keep up the great work of reinforcing the stereotype of the Obama supporter as a mindless drone who is trained to attack in a killer bee-like swarm at the slightest hint of a dissenting view. If you ever do put your claimed education to use and exercise one of those higher brain functions the rest of us call “thought”, you may just be surprised one day to see your chosen one in a whole new light.
A thousand mea culpas Jim M.
terrig
No need for mea culpas. Don’t know who left the portal to hell open to allow my “evil twin” to escape into civilized society.
TexasTiger, you used to be funny, but you’ve recently jumped the shark into sort of cruel and bigoted attempts at humor.
Glad to see the REAL Jim M showed up at the party. I left a post concerning the political posters already, and plead guilty to enabling the newest troll in the time honored tradition of the threadjack.
That said, here’s more.
I’m pleased “jim m” can do some research, but I don’t see one scintilla of elitism in Michelle’s column that he reprinted.
I’m stil asking “jim m:” What’s your point?
For the bazzillionth time. Liberals don’t need facts or the need to make a point.
I’ve read through all these posts. OtherSide - Obama’s point, as he spoke to a large group of west coast rich folks, was indeed that people from small towns in “flyover” country are indeed a bunch of “hicks”. That is exactly the point he was trying to make to that group of people - unfortunately for him, it got recorded and it got out, and now he’s got to figure out how to reduce the damage.
Learn to spell. Also, learn the difference between “effect” and “affect”.
dakine, don’t bother calling him out on it. They’ll just delete your posts while letting his jokes about people dying from AIDS remain.
Back to Obama.
There are more than a few people on this thread who cannot deal with the fact that Obama (Mr. “Just Words?” and “Words matter”) may actually mean what he says.
His words are not being taken out of context. To the contrary, when viewd in the context in which they were spoken, those words are all the more damning.
This is the same man who, earlier in his campaign, emphasized that the voters should rely upon his superior judgment rather than his lack of experience. Now that his judgment has been called into question, he has morphed once again into trying to convince people that he is a “man of the people”. Raised by a single mother (not really, but it conjures up visions of a working mother holding down 3 jobs to make ends meet) and borrowing money to advance himself through education (many of us did the same thing, but opted for a more affordable school over $30,000 a year in tuition).
Of course, some people cannot deal with the truth. Or facts. Those are the same people who would have us believe that Obama attended Trinity Church for over 20 years and counted Jeremiah Wright among his friends as well as his spiritual mentor, and NEVER had a clue that Wright preached hatred of Jews and white people. Those are the same people that have either never read Obama’s books or hope the rest of the world does not. Unfortunately, Obama has painted quite a vivid portrait of himself in his books as one who is closely aligned with his spiritual mentor.
And let’s not forget about his largest fundraiser prior to his Presidential run. Another “friend”. Or his “friends” who were convicted of domestic terrorism and who to this day have zero remorse for their deeds (hell, they think they should have planted more bombs).
Obama is just another sleazy Chicago politician whose greatest asset WAS the fact that little was known about him.
SNOBwear was just discussed on Fox and Friends.
Dakine, Mookie..
you missed the South Park explaining that AIDS if finally funny..
Watch this.. it will explain it all..
THEN you can talk about AIDS again..
http://www.stansdad.com/season6/episode2/
snobama wear–
God I love this captialistic country! It brings a tear to my eye that there is some Ferengi left in us after all.
GSP
small jim m..
way to cut and paste.
anyway.
good for you.. you DID get into your school of choice..
what have you done since then? bust your hump to get ahead? or p1ss and moan like you are doing now..
there are many, many colleges and universities in this country.. you know what you do if you can’t get into your school of choice? you MOVE ON!.. TRY ANOTHER SCHOOL, and if that doesn’t work, TRY AGAIN!!
a college degree is worthless if you don’t have the determination to back it up…
GSP,
you sound like a true Star Trek fan..
Sorry, bud. I admit that I find ABSOLUT jokes, Team America and monkeys to be funny…sometimes hilarious. The great thing about life is that we can walk through it with a smile on our face and a
songjoke in our hearts.If you can’t laugh a humanity’s foibles and shortcomings, then maybe you’re taking yourself too seriously.
Bless you for trying, but I fear your efforts are
fruitlesswasted.Near the start of this thread a troll posted his belief that conservatives–especially those who post here–are bitter and angry. As the course of this thread demonstrated, it’s the lefties who are humorless, bitter, angry name-callers.
I say we hoist the MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner and keep laughing!
Lets just say I used to wear the costumes, collect sci-fi stuff and still occasionally go to the cons!
I nominate Quark as the next head of the Federal Reserve Board to relieve Alan Greespan….hehehehe
GSP
The elitism in Michelle’s article is simple: She thinks she is entitled to a racial preference in admission because she is from the Phillipines. And she thinks the people who disagree are “pink skinned bigots”.
Do you think that people who disagree with racial preferences are “pink skinned bigots”?
On second thought…
Secretary of State: Deanna Troi
Secretary of Defense: Worf
Ambassador to the UN: Jean Luc Picard
Surgeon General: “Bones” McCoy
Federal Reserve Board: Quark
Head of the Department of Education: Q (John Delancie)
Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff: Beverly Crusher
Just my ST thoughts…
GSP
dltdhyotwo jim m.
aj:
Methinks jim m pushes doors marked PULL.
I don’t understand; are Obama’s toadies trying to justify his actual words, or his intentions? From the posts above, it seems both! Sheesh–I wish I had someone to do that for me…
What do bitter people in Big cities cling to?
Big Government?
This is the best logo yet.
How many of these have actually sold? Just curious…
Michelle is an elitist? Yeah, right. You are going to have to come up with a better attack line than that. Michelle is exactly what the liberal elite of this Country despise. A minority who does not walk in lock-step with liberal beliefs, and ideals. That is what I love the most about Michelle. She is who she is, and that is not going to change.
jim m., at first I didn’t understand what you were trying to get at with that column reprint. I remember that column. I remember the battle over I-200.
I had a completely different take on the column than you’ve had. MM was arguing that the position of the supporters of affirmative action in school enrollment shifted their definition of “minority”.
She pointed out the irony of being subjected to racial slurs when she was younger and being told that she was a “minority”. Later (in 1998) she found that the definition changed for political purposes.
She pointed out the hypocrisy of affirmative action zealots of all colors fearing that another minority would be over-represented in a meritocratic selection process. Zealots that include d members of that minority.
Her use of the term “pink skin bigots” was derisive for sure, but derisive was what she meant to be. She wasn’t arguing for preferential treatment. She was arguing for race-free decisions.
The fact that meant that Asian-Americans would not be considered a minority in classic affirmative action was a bit much to stomach for those of us watching the debate.
Sometimes I miss the old days in Seattle, when the arguments were simpler and we only had to worry about King and Pierce county voters screwing things up.
wighttrasch #114, I hope you aren’t labelling me an “Obama toadie”. That would be unwarranted, not to mention untrue.
What is the difference though between actual words and intentions? How does the former have any meaning without the context of the latter?
If I follow that they are independent then I could wind up doing a jim m. and saying that MM used the phrase “pink skin bigots” and therefore is racist. But we know better because her intentions were clear.
Despite all the spin (from the three corners of the Obama camp, the Hillary attack of opportunity, and the Right’s offended reaction) we can probably believe that he would not intentionally insult people he was trying to win over.
I don’t think he made any more outrageous statements than anyone else would make when they believe that everyone believes that government is the answer to all of our ills. He’s only being elitist in the political sense; along the same lines of “we’re from the government, and we’re here to help, cause, you know, you’ll be bitter if we don’t.”
But again, the image and the sentiment on the logo are pretty darn funny.
‘…we can probably believe that he would not intentionally insult people he was trying to win…’ (emphasis mine)
What’s this ‘we’ stuff?
You missed the entire point of the column..
you took one or two paragraphs and that is your entire opinion of MM..
It’s pretty obvious that someone hasn’t read anything else of hers to you in a long time..
Michelle is not an elitest- she has never belittled people. She was trying to promote and fight for RACE FREE decisions and not injecting race into the political options that people are deciding on.
Obama made HIS OWN statements. Obama supporters are making it sounds like it was a ‘right wing’ conspriacy, that somehow put the words in Obama’s mouth.
This is simply not true. He was answering a question, of his own free will. And the story was broke by the huffington Post, which is NOT a conservative media outlet.
He may not have meant what he said- but I believe that improv answers to questions are more telling that anything that pre-written. His emotions and his true thoughts come out alittle more each time he talks…
Hmmm…..I have to laugh at the “Snobama” product line. Political and social satire DOES have a place in the election discourse. Thanks for the grin on this monday morning.
As far as Obama’s comments are concerned?
Wasn’t he speaking at a private fund raiser in San Francisco? Isn’t this more about his pandering to his audience in order to raise campaign cash?
I guess he wasn’t expecting his comments to be made public. Now he has to resort to spinning and backtracking.
As does Hillary…As does John McCain…when their gaffes are made public. It makes me think that “political elitism” can’t be separated from a general elitist view.
I fear that this elitist view of governing fosters a “We’re from the government and we know better than you do as to what’s best for you” attitude.
And the fact that the efforts of the candidates to clean up the verbal piles are so simplistic,transparent, and obvious just reinforces the feeling that they do have a certain contempt for the public.
As to MM’s comments being perceived as “racist”……They didn’t seem that way to me. But that’s only my opinion.
Obama means exactly what he says…..a quote from his book says alot about this man:
“People are satisified so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisified, they were relieved-such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn’t seem angry all the time.”
“Seem” being the operative word here - This is what Obama and his wifey practice in front of the cameras. Behind them saying…”stupid whitey.”
Did Cafepress yank the shirts? I tried to buy one and it says it’s not available.
I’m getting the same message. They seem to be yanked? Or is there an error??
Read it again.
Asians were being excluded from the list of minorities becuse they succeeded WITHOUT racial preferences, which undermines the liberal argument for race-based quotas.
The “them” is “Asian-Americans“. The pink-skinned bigots are the one in FAVOR of affirmative action.
To sum up, Michelle was arguing against racial preferences in admission, which negates your argument she was demanding it for herself. The pink-skinned bigots are the liberals demanding recial preferences, not those in opposition.
This made me laugh!
What about it made you laugh, scooter?
Do you feel be-littled? Can you cite actual be-littling comments made by our hostess?