Comments on: Bush’s new faith-based North Korean nuclear proliferation policy

By: Michelle Malkin » Democrat less wrong than usual about nuclear proliferation

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:10:47 +0000

[...] us well. But her alternative plan just sounds like the Democrat version of what I’ve called a faith-based non-proliferation policy, because it trusts the North Koreans (and the Saudis) to do what’s in our interests instead [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » I’ve got a bad feeling about this

Michelle Malkin » I’ve got a bad feeling about this — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:37:41 +0000

[...] Because that sounds to me like another permutation of the faith-based non-proliferation policy. [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » Let the Nation of Islam patrol Miami? Sure, what could go wrong?

Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:04:17 +0000

[...] said before that I’m not for a faith-based nuclear proliferation policy. I can’t really get all fired up for faith-based policing either. And something tells me [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » Faith-Based North Korea Nuke Policy Revised

Michelle Malkin » Faith-Based North Korea Nuke Policy Revised — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:19:15 +0000

[...] this threat. A letter from 14 Republican Senators concerned about what I’ve dubbed the “faith-based” North Korea nuclear policy went out on Wednesday, and appeared to have the desired [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » CIA to put kibosh on faith-based North Korea nuclear policy?

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:49:35 +0000

[...] laying out the case against Bush’s faith-based North Korean nuclear policy, I asked this question: The story about the Israeli strike was that North Korea had given Syria [...]

By: beenthere

beenthere — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:30:26 +0000

Yes, Bush wants everyone to love him, because love is what makes the world go round and round — what a ditz. The man is daft, crazy, looney-toons, in his dotage, incompetent, as utterly unsuited for the job as . . . well, the current crop of clown-in-chief wannabees.

There are times in which I honestly think it would have been better if Gore had been elected. Bush always has this look on his face of a retarded two-year old who just wet his pants and wants to tell his nanny how proud he is of his achievement. It’s not that he doesn’t get it; it’s that he will never get it. I guarantee that within a year he will be joining Carter for a traveling road show, kind of a Loser Brothers for Peace. The two really are two peas in a pod; two evangelicals who not only believe in Jesus but seem to actually believe that they are Jesus.

Note: There is always someone on these threads who calls out for term-limits. Sadly, another great idea that won’t happen — that moment has passed. But I am increasingly persuaded that a single six year term for president is also a good idea. That might be worth a try.

By: Lilycat

Lilycat — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:05:50 +0000

As someone who voted for Bush twice because I didn’t like my other options, I have been continually disappointed and dismayed by his actions and lack of actions. I can’t even imagine what is wrong with the man. Does he just not care anymore? Does he just want everyone to like him? Is he afraid to rock the boat because he’s being held in so much contempt over Iraq? What IS it!!???

By: MNUSMCDavid

MNUSMCDavid — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:22:31 +0000

see-dubya

Whoa! Now that’s a ticket I could support!!!!

By: Buckaroo

Buckaroo — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:33:06 +0000

“McCain/Bolton”

hm, now i do suppose that’s a possibility, but i still don’t see JB warming to it …

/can u imagine the nutroots blood pressure spike?
//now, if JSM did appoint him, say, SecState [see above points once more] would he maintain his tough attitude or would he go the colin/condi waffle route?

By: see-dubya

see-dubya — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:16:26 +0000

Bolton for President? Ah, yes, the dreams of my youth...

By: Concerned Citizen

Concerned Citizen — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:11:05 +0000

On April 17th, 2008 at 9:33 pm, WORK949 said:
Rice is promising that any admission Pyongyang makes will be rigorously verified, and that there would be consequences later if North Korean cheating is discovered.

Like what? Harsh language?

Yes, in the form of a good stern talking to or maybe even a strongly worded letter!

McCain/Bolton?

By: jtex

jtex — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:48:57 +0000

What a gigantic load of male, bovine feces…

Playing patty cake with the N.K.’s is gonna get us all killed.

Are there any sane people left in this administration?

Lord help us because our Gov. certainly isn’t…

By: MNUSMCDavid

MNUSMCDavid — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:41:28 +0000

Here’s my dream, never to be realized I’m sure: John Bolton President 2012.

By: Cosmo

Cosmo — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:21:17 +0000

If Bolton were at the UN today, it’d be with a flamethrower in hand ready to torch the place. Bolton is old English for “has a pair of brass ones.”

On the other hand, “Schumer” who was so anti-Bolton, is North German for “vagabond” and “good-for-nothing”…awesome.

By: Chuck

Chuck — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:15:29 +0000

How did Clinton and Madeleine Halfbright get back in the White House? This is deja vu all over again. (apologies to Yogi)