“I watched with disgust the video of you and others mocking the veteran who attempted to protect OUR American flag. That’s right, it’s yours, too, whether you accept it or not. How could you allow the flag of your country to be desecrated in such a way? And the audacity of lecturing a man about free speech whose comrades bled and died to keep your speech free! You DO realize that were it not for the sacrifices of this man and all our military that you would NOT be able to do the very thing that you did? In any other country, you would have suffered severe consequences. I would expect that a University president would be able to grasp this elementary concept quite readily.

Breathtaking, and repulsive.”

Now, to take on the president of Yale. I am so profoundly disgusted by this student’s actions, that words fail me at the moment.

joetimek said:
Typical Malkin Commentator.
So you were willing to give her the benefit of the doubt when she lied and had EVERYONE fooled? Except you of course. Enlightened liberals have that extra allele that enables them to detect lying. You just wanted to see us squirm.

I refuse to allow some liberal to dictate to me what is right or wrong or moral based on their belief system or lack thereof! It’s sort of like, “How to be the best pig in the pig pen.”

I really don’t see what TheOtherSide wants to investigate, unless it is at which point(s) she actually lied.

That’s Frederic Remington’s A Dash For The Timber. It’s about macho gay cowboys who are fleeing the persecution of heteronormativity. I believe the medium was oil on canvas, but it may have been menstrual blood on human skin. I’ll have to check on that.

ROFLMAO

I’m glad I didn’t have any drink in my mouth, when I read that!

Yale “miscarriage artist” confesses to hoax? Update: I don’t know if I miscarried or not, says “artist”
HotAir

by Allahpundit
Art major Aliza Shvarts ‘08 wants to make a statement
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts (pictured) will be dis…

So when you have no truth, you can have no beauty, and when you can have no beauty, well, you get menstrual blood, urine and miscellaneous other body waste as art. What next, human sacrifices as “performance art”?

I’m certainly not an art connoisseur, but I can tell you there is something qualitatively different between, say, Monet’s “Rouen Cathedral” sequence and the grotesque garbage that’s often passed off as “modern art”.

Can anybody believe this is enduring “culture” in the league of Michelangeo, Tallis, Shakespeare? Will it be looked upon admiringly in 100, 200 or 500 years? I somehow doubt it will endure even the next couple of weeks.

The particularly sad part is the tragic decline in a once-great university to which this entire incident so eloquently testifies. Our grandchildren won’t forgive us, but I hope they can learn from us.

So we have a case where a) the sociopath is lying, in which case she should be disciplined if not expelled for academic dishonesty; b) the sociopath really did engage in this grotesque exercise in disregard for human life, in which case she should be disciplined if not expelled and her advisors need to be disciplined if not fired.

You know there’s strange mojo going on if NARAL is condemning something yet the Man Hater’s, er, Women’s Center thinks it’s swell. If the angry man haters at the Women’s Center can’t bring themselves to feel any sort of compassion for the unborn life the sociopath might have ruthlessly and unfeelingly destroyed for something as trivial as an art project, then why can’t they show concern that at the very least this sociopath is abusing her own body. Think about it…even if she was never pregnant, stimulating the uterus to shed its lining over and over again cannot be healthy. By its logic, the Man Hater’s Center would be fine with cutting, anorexia, bulimia, and suicide as legit uses of one’s own body.

And no one seems to give a rat’s patootie about the sociopath’s wellbeing. Not Yale. Not the feminists. Not even the sociopath’s parents.