Lunch-losing video: Gingrich and Pelosi tag-team for Al Gore

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 22, 2008 12:13 PM

I mentioned the massive, $300 million Gore-bastic global warming hype ad campaign a few weeks ago. I thought the Robertson/Sharpton pairing was going to be bad, but it’s nothing compared to these two stiffs on a couch peddling eco-alarmism. There was a time when Newt Gingrich and the Beltway GOP establishment could be counted on to defend free market environmentalism, property rights, and rational cost-benefit analyses. No more:

Whose grin looks more strained and frozen at the end?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Newt Gingrich, Noted Paleontologist, Replies to The Posthumous Luger | THE POSTHUMOUS LUGER
  2. Michelle Malkin: Newt sold us out now that he doesn’t need votes! | My Zen Arcade
  3. Newt Gingrich abandons America | The TIW Blog
  4. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Pelosi fights global warming — with Newt Gingrich
  5. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Betrayal.. Newt Gringrich gets seduced by the Dark Side of the force..
  6. DequalsS.com
  7. Michelle Malkin » Over to you, San Fran Nan. Hello? Nan?
  8. The DaleyGator » Blog Archive » Video-Newt and Nancy, Green and united
  9. Michelle Malkin » All eyes on PA; 8pm: Polls closed, “competitive” race is “too close to call;” 8:50pm: Fox calls it for Hillary, MSNBC follows
  10. Michelle Malkin » The GOP ad John McCain doesn’t want you to see
  11. Michelle Malkin » Nancy Pelosi’s lost Biblical verse
  12. Michelle Malkin » Newt breaks up with Nancy
  13. April, 2008 Archive « Right Minded Online
  14. Michelle Malkin » Gingrich gets back on the couch with Pelosi
  15. Michelle Malkin » Poll time: Is Newt Gingrich the best choice for RNC chair?
  16. Political Party Poop
  17. Michelle Malkin » New eco-fearmongering message from Dems: “The fate of our planet hangs in the balance!”
  18. Democrat=Socialist

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #296434
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm, Jeddite said:

    My coworkers are rabidly debating the Hussein Obama v. Clinton primary today and now this? I must not have survived the night’s rest and am now in a very bad place. :/

  2. #296438
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm, zorro said:

    Newt’s time has come and gone.

  3. #296439
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm, cpodug said:

    That’s the best thing that’s happened to my diet in years – I’ll keep it, and whenever I start to feel hungry, I’ll watch it. Completely takes the appetite away!

  4. #296441
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:16 pm, expat said:

    Al Gore = Out of Office. Needs work.
    Newt Gingrich = Out of Office. Needs work.

    Global warming = emotional issue that cretins with no sense will hyperventalate over and do stupid things like give money to Al Gore and Newt Gingrich. Both get work.

  5. #296442
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:16 pm, Buckaroo said:

    whiskey tango foxtrot?!

    i used to respect newt …

    as a commenter on another blog has said many a time “this climate change hectoring is NOT FUNNY anymore. Our lives are going to be HURT by all this garbage.”

  6. #296450
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm, jeffshultz said:

    Oh good. Now hopefully people will quit suggesting he run for some office again.

  7. #296451
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm, mymanpotsandpans said:

    What is it about Georgia politicians who won’t go away?

  8. #296455
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, libocrat said:

    I’m sorry, but most of my fellow Conservatives like or liked Newt because he SAID he was Conservative.
    He is so full of hot air he give Ted Kennedy a run for his money. Only we agree with most of what he SAYS.
    Talk is cheap.

  9. #296457
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    They have another one with Al Sharpton and Pat Robertson sitting on the couch. Saw them both on Fox news channel last night almost back to back.

  10. #296458
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    George Soros, David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger types all recognize that by Greening up the citizenry they can green-up their already fat wallets.

  11. #296463
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:22 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    It isn’t with a little bit of regret that I have to say that for years I never had much respect for Gingrich. I always kept it to myself. After this sorry display, I’m not going to feel disloyal to conservatives ever again, when ever Gingrich is the topic..

  12. #296465
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm, puhiawa said:

    The odd thing is that all these politicians are coming out in favor of Global Warming when the evidence that it has stopped is overwhelming. Do they read?

  13. #296466
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm, constructionbook said:

    Why do I feel so betrayed…
    Now, I can’t even trust Newt.
    I guess it comes down to not trusting
    any of ‘em, anymore!

    karl and the girls

  14. #296468
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:25 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    LESSER OF TWO EVILS….

    ACROSS THE Aisle ..Mc Cain / Feingold (sp) / Mc Cain/ Kennedy

    Republican pork spending….

    This “FROGGY” is jumping out of the slowly boiling water —- NOW!

  15. #296471
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Joy said:

    When someone told me he did this, I thought it was a joke.

    In 1975 it was Global Cooling and they were trying to figure out ways to melt the icebergs before they reached Arizona!

    What about natural earth cycles don’t these people get? Why are the Republicans selling out on this issue among many others?

    I think climate change is indeed happening, HELL is freezing over.

  16. #296475
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, LaLawLady said:

    Just another example of MSM pushing the latest fashion of political correctness and becoming so mainstream that it becomes a given, unquestionable fact. And anyone who attempts to argue otherwise is regarded as being out of touch, out of date or out of their minds.

  17. #296476
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, libocrat said:

    Newt is a crap weasel.
    I believe Cheap Trick said it best…..
    He’s a whore, he’ll do anything for money.

  18. #296478
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm, jeffshultz said:
    Oh good. Now hopefully people will quit suggesting he run for some office again.

    Megga ditto.

  19. #296482
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:37 pm, rightisright said:

    again…”follow the money”

  20. #296486
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:39 pm, mistressjustice said:

    Newt realizes he’s gonna take it on the chin from the right wingers for this add. I don’t see any evidence that he’s doing it for any financial gain.

    Maybe Newt really, honestly believes that our environment is in deep trouble if we don’t change the way we do things.

    Is it really fair to question his long history of strong conservative credentials just because of this campaign? Do you want leaders to stand up for what they believe in, or do you want androids that listen the Hannity, Rush and Beck, read MM, and tailor all of their opinions to suit the ultra-right base.
    I’ve never liked Newt, and rarely agreed with him, but I’ve almost always respected him.(except for the way he did his ex-wife, but that’s another story)

  21. #296488
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:40 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ok, who put the pod in Newt’s bed last month?

  22. #296489
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:41 pm, Dimsdale said:

    I am ready to start looking for human sized pods in Newt’s basement….

  23. #296497
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:44 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ha-Dimsdale. We’ve seen the same 1950s movies.

  24. #296500
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Right = Left. The paradigm has expired and there is only one party left to rule us. We have to fight against these control measures tooth and nail. Please people, global warming is not a Left vs. Right Issue anymore, it’s not even a Science vs. Junk Science issue, it’s now the People vs. the Elites.

    Cling to your Guns!

  25. #296503
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:45 pm, cpodug said:

    Uh – I have too – but I saw it when it first came out!

  26. #296505
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, rbb said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:40 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ok, who put the pod in Newt’s bed last month?

    Last month? Try years ago when that cr*pweasel started cheating around and surrendering all the gains the Republicans made in 94…

  27. #296506
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, j0 said:

    It was a “WTF?” moment when I saw this ad on tv last night.

    Newt disappoints me. :(

  28. #296507
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, undrseige247 said:

    I knew I shouldn’t have made Cowboy Stew for lunch today. I might have to counteract my dyspepsia it with borscht or something.

  29. #296508
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, John Ansell said:

    Newt has some great ideas on the subject. Please hear him out and then decide. You know regulations and changes are coming. It’s just how we want them to come about. An example: Should we give incentives to companies that come up with alternative fuels or tax the hell out of them until they move to another county or shut down all together?

  30. #296512
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Should we give incentives to companies that come up with alternative fuels or tax the hell out of them until they move to another county or shut down all together?

    Tax the hell out of them. NEXT.

  31. #296513
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Speakup said:

    Newt thinks we need to be part of the debate so he validates this chicken little syndrome fueled by the same junk science thats already admitted that no matter what we do the result won’t change?

    Doesn’t say much Newt.

  32. #296518
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:52 pm, xblade said:

    You know regulations and changes are coming. It’s just how we want them to come about.

    Yeah, they’re coming because people like Newt sell out to this fraud instead of standing against it.

  33. #296521
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Joy said:

    Recently there has been an ad on the left sidebar at Townhall of Al Gore and his climate change crap. I wondered why they were running that.

    And I just noticed another climate change ad is running on the right sidebar. Are Conservatives starting to buy this crap? The temps have been cooling for the past few years again. Climate change has nada to do with what humans do… It’s a cycle the earth goes through. Why… WHY are conservatives buying into this???

  34. #296522
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Tax the hell out of them. NEXT.

    That is the policy of big gooberment is it not, find something to tax? So, now we will be taxed on the air we breathe (okay, carbon usage). It took a long time to come up with an idea to do just the – tax the air. Remember when the “air waves” belonged to the public? This is where Newt lost us. Not that we are “ultra-right base”.

    Mark my words, we will be taxed for sun usage some day (as soon as the politico’s figure out what to call it).

  35. #296528
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm, corkie said:

    Should we give incentives to companies that come up with alternative fuels or tax the hell out of them until they move to another county or shut down all together?

    What taxes are you talking about???? Companies have to earn a profit in order to be taxed. The “alternative fuels” companies haven’t even come close yet. And by the time they do, they’ll have enough tax-loss-carryforwards to last them for years.

  36. #296531
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:02 pm, dejack said:

    The effect on our economy if the global warming chicken-littles get their way will be disastrous. Watching Republicans give in on this rather than fighting, at a time when the evidence is mounting that this is nothing but hysteria, is very depressing.

  37. #296534
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:04 pm, cpodug said:

    The Alar scare all over again

  38. #296535
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm, spo-con said:

    Just think Green, the color of bile. These two are nauseating. Perfect book ends.

  39. #296537
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm, capitano said:

    Maybe Algore let Newt ride in the front of his jumbo jet. I understand it has been a lifelong dream of his.

  40. #296539
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:06 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Newt disappoints me

    Newt is just the tip of the iceberg, Republicans in general are adopting the global warming agenda. Our current president, and all our presidential candidates have bought into the Global Warming hoax, and are executing it’s agenda predictably.

    Recently there has been an ad on the left sidebar at Townhall of Al Gore and his climate change crap. I wondered why they were running that.

    You’ll also notice that most “conservative” commentators have started banging the Global Warming drum. The memo must have gone out. Global Warming is a perfect bogeyman for the ruling class, and the Republicans have adopted it accordingly. Now all we have to do to protect ourselves from terrorists and climate change is give up all our rights and guns, and pay the government for the privilege of breathing and driving.

  41. #296541
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:06 pm, rooster said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:
    It took a long time to come up with an idea to do just the – tax the air.

    Soap,

    This is not new, its taken right out of the euro tax “the hell out of ‘em” book.

    From my experience, Germany has been taxing the air for years. Long before this global warming hoax started.

    Anyplace that is determined to be a resort is subject to this special tax.

    Of course you have church tax taken out of your check in relation to your denomination.

    The libs love europe, and europe loves the libs, ever wonder why? Birds of a feather.

  42. #296542
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:07 pm, jrosenau said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, j0 said:

    It was a “WTF?” moment when I saw this ad on tv last night.

    Newt disappoints me. :(

    I saw the ad last night to. Had the same reaction.

  43. #296544
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Jbgood said:

    The Democratic party left Reagan. He became a Republican. The Democratic party left me. I became a Republican.
    The Republican party left me. Where to now? This is the worst presidential election cycle I have witnessed in my life. I have admired Newt for a long time. Now this.???

  44. #296545
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm, bluesoc said:

    There was a time when Newt Gingrich and the Beltway GOP establishment could be counted on to defend free market environmentalism, property rights, and rational cost-benefit analyses

    Michelle, where did you get this idea? Check out Newt’s site. All he talks about are free market solutions and property rights. Or check out this interview he did at Slate .

    Here’s a quote from the interview: “I want to start by saying that I believe we need an entrepreneurial, science and technology oriented approach to the environment…a majority of Democrats, independents, and Republicans all agree that entrepreneurs can do more than bureaucrats to solve environmental challenges”

  45. #296547
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Barry F. said:

    Pelosi and Gingrich: Washington birds of a feather and all that jazz. :roll:

    I saw it on television a few days ago on Fox News Channel, if I remember correctly. Then, a couple of days later, I saw the one with Sharpton and Robertson.

    Hopefully, as alluded above, this will nip the talk of Gingrich running on the Republican ticket in the bud.

  46. #296551
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:13 pm, Boomer said:

    The very public service announcement that I talked about on the Celebrate: Earth Day thread. I feel like there are no conservatives left in the halls of government except for a very small and shrinking minority. :(

  47. #296553
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:14 pm, rooster said:

    Hopefully, as alluded above, this will nip the talk of Gingrich running on the Republican ticket in the bud.

    Amen, my brother from another mother!

  48. #296555
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:15 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I’ll be sending Newt’s book back to the conservative bookclub. No way I’m paying for it now. Everyone has just gone completely mad.

  49. #296557
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, geminicontender said:

    Unfortunately Newt is showing his RINO side. This is very unfortunate, especially with all the news against global warming finally showing its face.

  50. #296558
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, John Ansell said:

    Thanks for all the comments. I don’t believe in this hype, I just see that we can fight fire with fire. Cut taxes all in the name of gorebal warming. How would the lefties not pass something for gorebal warminng?

  51. #296559
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, tomk59 said:

    I gotta love it. This site and Hot Air, how many times have we seen “Newt for President” and such. The guy is what he’s always been; all for Newt, no different or better then the rest.
    He’s a gadfly, running from station to station for his fees, and hey, buy my new book!
    The sooner you all realize that nearly all of these people are self serving parasites and do something about it at your local levels and at the polls, then you’re gonna keep being shocked by the obvious.

  52. #296560
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:17 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Hopefully, as alluded above, this will nip the talk of Gingrich running on the Republican ticket in the bud.

    It didn’t stop McCain.

  53. #296562
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:19 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I haven’t seen any of these commercials, I must be doing something right. Woohoo!!

  54. #296565
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Hadenough said:

    No shock or mystery here.

    Newt= Old corrupt Republican party.
    Pelosi= New corrupt Demolican party.

  55. #296569
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:23 pm, DirkBelig said:

    We haven’t had a hurricane worthy of the designation in the two years since Katrina and Vancouver just had their latest snowfall ever. The hysteria about global warming is being disproved by Mother Nature herself and where are those who are willing to speak Truth to the eco-terrorists like Al Gore? We used to be able to depend on CONSERVATIVES like McCain and Gingrich, but they have decided to slurp from the Treason Media’s Kool-Aid nozzles in the futile hope that they will then be loved. Stupid fools. We are lost.

  56. #296574
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:26 pm, libocrat said:

    I remember The Reverend Bobby Knight speaking on this subject.
    “”"I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it. …”"
    I’m not enjoying it. I’m white, I’m bitter, I’m Christian and I’m clinging to my guns.

  57. #296576
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:27 pm, NJRepublican said:

    I know! I saw it during a commercial break on FNC the other night and nearly lost dinner. Eck!

  58. #296582
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:29 pm, PoeMangonel said:

    Now I am green today too – from nausea. Farewell, Newt. It was fun.

    Can anyone tell me what the color of common sense is?

  59. #296588
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Papa Louie said:

    One thing is for certain, this is not an example of Left and Right coming together over Global Warming. Pelosi has not budged an inch, Newt has completely capitulated to the Left on this issue. Its bad enough that the Left wants to surrender in the war on terrorism, but some on the Right want to surrender to the cowards on the Left. What spineless RINO’s! The only problem Global Warming has created is insanity!

  60. #296595
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:36 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Everybody wants their piece of the global warming pie. I hope they choke on it. I cannot afford this crap. I’m trying to fix up the affordable house my husband and I bought instead of the house on the lake. Which if we had bought and couldn’t afford it, my liberal superheroes could swoop in and fly all of my problems away. Damn me for being responsible…

  61. #296596
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:38 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I saw this commercial on The History Channel last night and really wanted to vomit.

    How many “conservatives” are going to turn turncoat? I may never vote Republican again!

  62. #296597
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:38 pm, JT said:

    Saw it last night. Ugh! What is with these Republicans acting like/becoming nutroots?

  63. #296605
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:41 pm, USMCgramma said:

    I thought my husband was joking until I saw and heard this sickening video clip. We’ve been sold out by another phony conservative Republican Fox News contributor.

  64. #296619
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:48 pm, mattm said:

    You know what a dog/cat does and sounds like right before it is about to barf? That’s what I feel like now.

  65. #296622
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:49 pm, Old Scout said:

    He couldn’t pass up the money or the publicity.

    And I guess he felt that he didn’t say anything terribly bad:

    “Our country must take action to address climate change.”

    The debate these days is about whether or not there’s climate change actually happening, and what’s causing it. So, speaking as a true politician, he didn’t actually say that there was climate change due to the usual suspects – rather, we should address climate change.

  66. #296627
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:51 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    rrb # 26
    You pracically took the words right out of my updated response.
    Thanks

  67. #296629
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    …practically…

  68. #296631
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:53 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Someday I’ll be able to proof w/o enlarged print :-)

  69. #296637
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm, geokstr said:

    What taxes are you talking about???? Companies have to earn a profit in order to be taxed.

    Wrong.

    Government has invented many more ingenious ways to vacuum money out of the pockets of the citizenry than merely “income” taxes. Do you think if the oil companies and/or cigarette manufacturers were losing money, the government would rescind or even temporarily suspend their hefty share of the price of a gallon/pack? Hardly.

    The taxes on “green” companies would simply be another component of the “price” to the public, regardless of the profitability of the product/service. Since using the products/services would then be mandated by law, like having a required percent of ethanol in gasoline by year 20XX, the public would not even have the option of making their own spending choices. Suspension of the practice of capitalism has long been an underlying goal of the ecofreaks anyway.

    The tax component of the price of these two products (and there are many others, like alcohol) is already so large that the “profit” per unit to government is many multiples higher than that earned by the manufacturers themselves.

    And the government does absolutely nothing to “earn” their take, except to shovel the money into the bottomless pit in Washington. In fact, in the case of the oil companies in particular, it does everything it possibly can to make it more difficult for them to invest in future profit-making opportunities, like Anwar and off-shore drilling, or exploring the vast reserves under the western United States, or even building more refineries.

  70. #296641
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm, tropicalwave12 said:

    I think this is a sign of the Apocolypse. The End is truly near.

  71. #296642
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm, babbledabble said:

    Repeat something often enough (even if it’s pure BS) & pretty soon people will begin to believe it.

  72. #296649
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:01 pm, Papa Louie said:

    The main breeding season for newts is between the months of February and June.

    Oh, thats what’s going on here. Newt is just trying to impress liberal chicks by pretending to be green. After his hormones subside in June, he’ll come back to his senses and try to restore his damaged reputation. Sorry Newt, I don’t care if you were blinded by raging hormons. You made your bed with Polosi, now you can lie in it.

  73. #296651
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:02 pm, bear1909 said:

    These dolts can bloat and fester all they want.

    When it comes down to it, technology and fuels are about to morph out of the reach of Pelosi Galore’s and Bewt’s cognizance.

    The morphing of technology and fuels is based on something oil corporations have bet their survival on- real science done by real scientists who can’t make sh*t up and then quote moral platitudes to justify their chicanery.

    Gore’s “Climate Change” horse hockey has been discredited by real science. The dry bones of Gore’s Nobel theories are rattling in embarassing timbre as we speak.

    The tax effort will collapse as oil corporations and automakers begin to show cards they haven’t just yet, and new ways of looking at an old problem come to the fore.

    And that impossible Peanut Head from Georgia finally kicks off….remember his solution to the “energy crisis” of the 70s? Wear a sweater! LMAO And he was a nuclear engineer?

    OY!

  74. #296664
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:14 pm, Mister P said:

    Just one more confirmation I have held for years. There is NO Difference between Republicans and Democrats. It is just one big scam.

  75. #296665
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:14 pm, love2rumba said:

    I think it is time for conservatives to seriously consider leaving the republican party.

    When you have Bob Barr snd Mike Gravel of Alaska joining the Libertarians- individuals with serious political experience-and the Republicans all but caving in the Left on Illegal Immigration and global warming, it is time to take stock and see if it is worth it for us conservatives to continue supporting a party that loves our vote and then tries to screw us with it once they are in office.

    In other words I already see a re-establishment of political equilibrium, but this time away from the Republicans,and to lesser extent the Democrats, but to what?

    Can I fully swallow ALL that the Libertarians go for? Hmmm….The thought is increasingly tempting.

  76. #296668
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:16 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    So much for global warming. Earth Day festivities went ahead despite the blast of frigid weather yesterday.

    Vendors and presenters from various eco-friendly groups, including Bullfrog Power, CO2 Reduction Edmonton and the local solar energy society, crammed into a lone tent in Hawrelak Park after a blizzard forced them to abandon their original locations.
    Organizers crammed over 40 groups in a space that would normally be occupied by half that number. Presenters’ booths were initially planned to have been spread out between at least five tents, with far larger displays.

    “We’re normally here with a lineup of cyclists for our free bike repair service. No bikers came today. Big surprise,” said Chris Field of Mountain Equipment Co-Op.

    [Emphasis is mine.] I guess the blizzard was magically connected with global worming as well.

  77. #296689
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:24 pm, bigterpfan said:

    My 2 cents on this matter.

    I’m hardly a scientist, but I’m certainly not as certain as the consensus seems to be around here that human conduct can’t bring about change in the environment. Around these parts, the downtown area is usually 10 or so degrees warmer than the areas surrounding the city. Why? It seems to me that it has something to with the densities of the building in the downtown area. Isn’t it possible that “global warming” or “climate change” just a larger-scale version of this heat-island effect, i.e., human conduct effecting “natural” temperatures?

    Also, it seems to me that the desire to develop alternative fuels and tax incentives for such development is an idea which should cut across party lines and politics.

  78. #296693
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:25 pm, Dan Lee said:

    For the rest of my life, I will look back to this example to demonstrate for younger people the difference between:

    “Conservative” & “Conservative POLITICIAN..”

    ~ Dan Lee

  79. #296695
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:29 pm, wighttrasch said:

    I was joking (re:tax the hell out of them), as I’m sure you understood. Using absurdity to illustrate a point, as Rush would say. There were only two options given. There is another way–drill for the oil that we know is there.

  80. #296698
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:29 pm, John Ansell said:

    Here is a recent response from Newt himself:

    The Gingrich-Pelosi Climate Change Ad: Why I Took Part
    Many of you have written to me to ask why I recently taped an advertisement with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for The Alliance for Climate Protection, a group founded by former Vice President Al Gore.

    I completely understand why many of you would have questions about this, so I want to take this opportunity to explain my reasons. First of all, I want to be clear: I don’t think that we have conclusive proof of global warming. And I don’t think we have conclusive proof that humans are at the center of it.

    But here’s what we do know. There is an important debate going on right now over the right energy policy, the right environmental policy, and making sure we do the right things for our future and the future of our children and grandchildren. Conservatives are missing from this debate, and I think that’s a mistake. When it comes to preserving our environment for future generations, we can’t have a slogan of “Just yell no!”

    I have a different view. I think it’s important to be on the stage, to engage in the debate, and to communicate our position clearly. There is a big difference between left-wing environmentalism that wants higher taxes, bigger government., more bureaucracy, more regulation, more red tape, and more litigation and a Green Conservatism that wants to use science, technology, innovation, entrepreneurs, and prizes to find a way to creatively invent the kind of environmental future we all want to live in. Unless we start making the case for the latter, we’re going to get the former. That’s why I took part in the ad.

    You can also get more information by looking at Contract with the Earth

  81. #296709
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:36 pm, jbjm said:

    Makes me wonder what companies are in Newt’s financial portfolio?

  82. #296714
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:39 pm, JohnS said:

    How is this “coming together” when Pelosi doesn’t move an inch? The only people moving are the “conservatives”, who are moving drastically to the left!. We will never see Liberals move to the right to solve a BS problem. That is it for me with Newt Gingrich. He has good ideas, but this is the last straw. It is like Rush says…why do we except these Liberal premises? Especially when the jury is still out on man-made Global Warming. What a crock. I lost all respect for Newt here.

  83. #296728
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm, Jim M. said:

    A stark reminder that, first and foremost, Newt is a politician. And like all politicians, they have an irresistable, almost Pavlovian, response to the almighty dollar or to opportunities that reverse their growing irrelevancy. I believe I even saw his mouth watering while sitting next to Pelosi.

  84. #296732
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, emjem24 said:

    Yep, when I saw this ad with Pelosi and Gingrich, I was pretty nauseous. I guess Newt really misses the limelight and if Pelosi puts on one more coating of makeup she’ll look positively inert (okay that’s her most of the time). ;-)

    Newt also misunderstands even underestimates the intelligence of everyday conservatives. For him to cozy up to Pelosi because he thinks that no other conservative will is just a joke. The thing that Newt is missing is that he’s accommodating this insane movement through engagement. It’s like Carter talking with Hamas- what’s the ultimate outcome of such a pairing?

    Newt really missed the mark on this one. For him to think that Conservatives aren’t aware of the environment and ways to conserve really implies why his tenure as House Speaker didn’t last all that long. :mad:

  85. #296742
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:01 pm, NavyMom said:

    Where, where, WHERE are the statesmen our country so desperately needs today? Sigh. I guess I’ll have to content myself with watching old C-Span footage of the Gipper and savor the glory days.

  86. #296755
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:07 pm, James Felix said:

    This is a little off topic, I know, but…

    with Heath Ledger’s tragic death has anyone tapped Pelosi to play The Joker in any subsequent Batman movies? She looks like she could pull it off with minimal makeup.

  87. #296770
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    et tu Newt? The GOP is not even a shell of it’s former, somewhat conservative, self.

  88. #296802
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm, ahraley said:

    I am …. …. …. speechless.

    Newt??? Wake up and smell the Kool Aid!

  89. #296807
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Jbgood said:

    Newt said, “I have a different view. I think it’s important to be on the stage, to engage in the debate, and to communicate our position clearly.”

    That wouldn’t be so bad as long as our position was there is no such thing as man made global warming. It seems to me we are simply crossing the aisle one more time while the democrats stand their ground.

    I’ll wait and see before I make anymore judgements about Newt. I don’t expect much, other than moving closer to the dems on this or any other issue.

  90. #296811
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:50 pm, pabarge said:

    Newt? You’re dead to me, dude.

    Adios. It’s been nice, but now it’s time to crawl back under your rock.

  91. #296847
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:14 pm, Trunk Monkey said:

    He is just getting paid like the “Provides services for money” he is.

    He could not beat them so he joins them.

  92. #296852
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:17 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    “We don’t always see eye-to-eye, but we do agree that the government can ride roughshod over you roobs because you’ll believe any of the tripe we sell you, and you will buy it with a smile on your face.”

    How much is this guy getting to sell us up the river?

  93. #296869
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:26 pm, Mohawk said:

    I have to say when I saw this last night I was like wth is newt doing on the same couch with “that women”.

    Now I have to write newt off as well!

  94. #296904
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:50 pm, ScottyDog said:

    Newt is being exposed for the Rockefeller Republican he always has been and his CFR agenda is on full display.He is promoting the same elitist agenda on the man made Global Warming Hoax.
    He has just repacked the name, “Green Conservatism” using the spin that we must be in the debate.
    From his own website there is this:.

    “As a key part of green prosperity and green development, there has to be a green energy strategy which is designed to enable the human race to make the transition from historic fossil fuels which dramatically improved the quality of life over the pre-industrial period to a new clean generation of energy which will: enable us in national security terms to be liberated from dependence on dangerous dictatorships; enable us in economic terms to be effective in worldwide competition; and enable us in environmental terms to provide for a much cleaner and healthier future.”

    There is absolutely no evidence that “Fossil Fuels” are in any way raising the temperature of the earth yet he is claiming that we must make the transition to some magical alternative fuel that will benefit man kind. There is no alternative fuel on the horizon and probably will not be in the next 50 years.

    When he was in Congress, he could have worked to stop Congress from capping oil wells letting the Government take over the oil industry in America. We have more oil in the USA than we could possibly use but our own Congress has placed it all off limits due to “environmental” concerns, which I think is just a cover for the Government taking over the oil industry. (They already make more money than the oil companies in taxing them)

    The Energy Crisis has been created by our own Government and IMHO it is criminal that it is allowed to continue. Our economy is being destroyed as we speak.

    The ethanol mandates that GWB recently signed into law are resulting in Global Food shortages and famine in some third world countries. Because of the Ethanol fuel mandates alone, Food prices have increased by 37% last year because the price of corn that is used to make ethanol has tripled in price.

    If we allowed the North Slope of Alaska to be opened to Domestic production and not just ANWAR, we would see crude oil prices of $10-15 dollars a barrel. It is all supply and demand.

    What kind of insanity allows this hoax to continue under the name of Global Warming or Environmentalism?

  95. #296920
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm, John Ansell said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Jbgood said: That wouldn’t be so bad as long as our position was there is no such thing as man made global warming.

    Good point. As you can see in Newt’s response that I posted, he states he doesn’t think it’s man made. I admit, I’m a huge Newt fan and I was worried when I first started seeing this issue growing on his site, but after reading much of what he’s thinking, it’s not as bad as people are trying to make it.

    I’m glad to see that you are willing to keep an open mind.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Ho-hum: Pelosicare hikes costs $289 billion

November 14, 2009 10:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Clownifying education reform again

November 11, 2009 04:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Hey, Nancy: Can you hear America now?

November 5, 2009 03:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

How Scozzafava repays NRCC and RNC

November 1, 2009 05:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

155 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Radical leftist GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava quits

October 31, 2009 11:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

282 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

Halloween treat.

Yes, Newt, the GOP should be “purged” of left-wing saboteurs

October 27, 2009 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Plus: The rejected RNC solicitation form of the day.


Categories: Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook