About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Lunch-losing video: Gingrich and Pelosi tag-team for Al Gore

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 22, 2008 12:13 PM

I mentioned the massive, $300 million Gore-bastic global warming hype ad campaign a few weeks ago. I thought the Robertson/Sharpton pairing was going to be bad, but it’s nothing compared to these two stiffs on a couch peddling eco-alarmism. There was a time when Newt Gingrich and the Beltway GOP establishment could be counted on to defend free market environmentalism, property rights, and rational cost-benefit analyses. No more:

Whose grin looks more strained and frozen at the end?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Newt Gingrich, Noted Paleontologist, Replies to The Posthumous Luger | THE POSTHUMOUS LUGER
  2. Michelle Malkin: Newt sold us out now that he doesn’t need votes! | My Zen Arcade
  3. Newt Gingrich abandons America | The TIW Blog
  4. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: Pelosi fights global warming — with Newt Gingrich
  5. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Betrayal.. Newt Gringrich gets seduced by the Dark Side of the force..
  6. DequalsS.com
  7. Michelle Malkin » Over to you, San Fran Nan. Hello? Nan?
  8. The DaleyGator » Blog Archive » Video-Newt and Nancy, Green and united
  9. Michelle Malkin » All eyes on PA; 8pm: Polls closed, “competitive” race is “too close to call;” 8:50pm: Fox calls it for Hillary, MSNBC follows
  10. Michelle Malkin » The GOP ad John McCain doesn’t want you to see
  11. Michelle Malkin » Nancy Pelosi’s lost Biblical verse

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm, Jeddite said:

    My coworkers are rabidly debating the Hussein Obama v. Clinton primary today and now this? I must not have survived the night’s rest and am now in a very bad place. :/

  2. #2
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm, zorro said:

    Newt’s time has come and gone.

  3. #3
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm, cpodug said:

    That’s the best thing that’s happened to my diet in years - I’ll keep it, and whenever I start to feel hungry, I’ll watch it. Completely takes the appetite away!

  4. #4
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:16 pm, expat said:

    Al Gore = Out of Office. Needs work.
    Newt Gingrich = Out of Office. Needs work.

    Global warming = emotional issue that cretins with no sense will hyperventalate over and do stupid things like give money to Al Gore and Newt Gingrich. Both get work.

  5. #5
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:16 pm, Buckaroo said:

    whiskey tango foxtrot?!

    i used to respect newt …

    as a commenter on another blog has said many a time “this climate change hectoring is NOT FUNNY anymore. Our lives are going to be HURT by all this garbage.”

  6. #6
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm, jeffshultz said:

    Oh good. Now hopefully people will quit suggesting he run for some office again.

  7. #7
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm, mymanpotsandpans said:

    What is it about Georgia politicians who won’t go away?

  8. #8
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, libocrat said:

    I’m sorry, but most of my fellow Conservatives like or liked Newt because he SAID he was Conservative.
    He is so full of hot air he give Ted Kennedy a run for his money. Only we agree with most of what he SAYS.
    Talk is cheap.

  9. #9
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, Just A Grunt said:

    They have another one with Al Sharpton and Pat Robertson sitting on the couch. Saw them both on Fox news channel last night almost back to back.

  10. #10
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm, meatpieandtatters said:

    George Soros, David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger types all recognize that by Greening up the citizenry they can green-up their already fat wallets.

  11. #11
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:22 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    It isn’t with a little bit of regret that I have to say that for years I never had much respect for Gingrich. I always kept it to myself. After this sorry display, I’m not going to feel disloyal to conservatives ever again, when ever Gingrich is the topic..

  12. #12
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm, puhiawa said:

    The odd thing is that all these politicians are coming out in favor of Global Warming when the evidence that it has stopped is overwhelming. Do they read?

  13. #13
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm, constructionbook said:

    Why do I feel so betrayed…
    Now, I can’t even trust Newt.
    I guess it comes down to not trusting
    any of ‘em, anymore!

    karl and the girls

  14. #14
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:25 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    LESSER OF TWO EVILS….

    ACROSS THE Aisle ..Mc Cain / Feingold (sp) / Mc Cain/ Kennedy

    Republican pork spending….

    This “FROGGY” is jumping out of the slowly boiling water —- NOW!

  15. #15
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:30 pm, Joy said:

    When someone told me he did this, I thought it was a joke.

    In 1975 it was Global Cooling and they were trying to figure out ways to melt the icebergs before they reached Arizona!

    What about natural earth cycles don’t these people get? Why are the Republicans selling out on this issue among many others?

    I think climate change is indeed happening, HELL is freezing over.

  16. #16
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, LaLawLady said:

    Just another example of MSM pushing the latest fashion of political correctness and becoming so mainstream that it becomes a given, unquestionable fact. And anyone who attempts to argue otherwise is regarded as being out of touch, out of date or out of their minds.

  17. #17
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, libocrat said:

    Newt is a crap weasel.
    I believe Cheap Trick said it best…..
    He’s a whore, he’ll do anything for money.

  18. #18
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm, jeffshultz said:
    Oh good. Now hopefully people will quit suggesting he run for some office again.

    Megga ditto.

  19. #19
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:37 pm, rightisright said:

    again…”follow the money”

  20. #20
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:39 pm, mistressjustice said:

    Newt realizes he’s gonna take it on the chin from the right wingers for this add. I don’t see any evidence that he’s doing it for any financial gain.

    Maybe Newt really, honestly believes that our environment is in deep trouble if we don’t change the way we do things.

    Is it really fair to question his long history of strong conservative credentials just because of this campaign? Do you want leaders to stand up for what they believe in, or do you want androids that listen the Hannity, Rush and Beck, read MM, and tailor all of their opinions to suit the ultra-right base.
    I’ve never liked Newt, and rarely agreed with him, but I’ve almost always respected him.(except for the way he did his ex-wife, but that’s another story)

  21. #21
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:40 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ok, who put the pod in Newt’s bed last month?

  22. #22
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:41 pm, Dimsdale said:

    I am ready to start looking for human sized pods in Newt’s basement….

  23. #23
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:44 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ha-Dimsdale. We’ve seen the same 1950s movies.

  24. #24
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:45 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Right = Left. The paradigm has expired and there is only one party left to rule us. We have to fight against these control measures tooth and nail. Please people, global warming is not a Left vs. Right Issue anymore, it’s not even a Science vs. Junk Science issue, it’s now the People vs. the Elites.

    Cling to your Guns!

  25. #25
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:45 pm, cpodug said:

    Uh - I have too - but I saw it when it first came out!

  26. #26
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, rbb said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:40 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Ok, who put the pod in Newt’s bed last month?

    Last month? Try years ago when that cr*pweasel started cheating around and surrendering all the gains the Republicans made in 94…

  27. #27
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, j0 said:

    It was a “WTF?” moment when I saw this ad on tv last night.

    Newt disappoints me. :(

  28. #28
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, undrseige247 said:

    I knew I shouldn’t have made Cowboy Stew for lunch today. I might have to counteract my dyspepsia it with borscht or something.

  29. #29
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, John Ansell said:

    Newt has some great ideas on the subject. Please hear him out and then decide. You know regulations and changes are coming. It’s just how we want them to come about. An example: Should we give incentives to companies that come up with alternative fuels or tax the hell out of them until they move to another county or shut down all together?

  30. #30
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Should we give incentives to companies that come up with alternative fuels or tax the hell out of them until they move to another county or shut down all together?

    Tax the hell out of them. NEXT.

  31. #31
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, Speakup said:

    Newt thinks we need to be part of the debate so he validates this chicken little syndrome fueled by the same junk science thats already admitted that no matter what we do the result won’t change?

    Doesn’t say much Newt.

  32. #32
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:52 pm, xblade said:

    You know regulations and changes are coming. It’s just how we want them to come about.

    Yeah, they’re coming because people like Newt sell out to this fraud instead of standing against it.

  33. #33
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, Joy said:

    Recently there has been an ad on the left sidebar at Townhall of Al Gore and his climate change crap. I wondered why they were running that.

    And I just noticed another climate change ad is running on the right sidebar. Are Conservatives starting to buy this crap? The temps have been cooling for the past few years again. Climate change has nada to do with what humans do… It’s a cycle the earth goes through. Why… WHY are conservatives buying into this???

  34. #34
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Tax the hell out of them. NEXT.

    That is the policy of big gooberment is it not, find something to tax? So, now we will be taxed on the air we breathe (okay, carbon usage). It took a long time to come up with an idea to do just the - tax the air. Remember when the “air waves” belonged to the public? This is where Newt lost us. Not that we are “ultra-right base”.

    Mark my words, we will be taxed for sun usage some day (as soon as the politico’s figure out what to call it).

  35. #35
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm, corkie said:

    Should we give incentives to companies that come up with alternative fuels or tax the hell out of them until they move to another county or shut down all together?

    What taxes are you talking about???? Companies have to earn a profit in order to be taxed. The “alternative fuels” companies haven’t even come close yet. And by the time they do, they’ll have enough tax-loss-carryforwards to last them for years.

  36. #36
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:02 pm, dejack said:

    The effect on our economy if the global warming chicken-littles get their way will be disastrous. Watching Republicans give in on this rather than fighting, at a time when the evidence is mounting that this is nothing but hysteria, is very depressing.

  37. #37
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:04 pm, cpodug said:

    The Alar scare all over again

  38. #38
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm, spo-con said:

    Just think Green, the color of bile. These two are nauseating. Perfect book ends.

  39. #39
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm, capitano said:

    Maybe Algore let Newt ride in the front of his jumbo jet. I understand it has been a lifelong dream of his.

  40. #40
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:06 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Newt disappoints me

    Newt is just the tip of the iceberg, Republicans in general are adopting the global warming agenda. Our current president, and all our presidential candidates have bought into the Global Warming hoax, and are executing it’s agenda predictably.

    Recently there has been an ad on the left sidebar at Townhall of Al Gore and his climate change crap. I wondered why they were running that.

    You’ll also notice that most “conservative” commentators have started banging the Global Warming drum. The memo must have gone out. Global Warming is a perfect bogeyman for the ruling class, and the Republicans have adopted it accordingly. Now all we have to do to protect ourselves from terrorists and climate change is give up all our rights and guns, and pay the government for the privilege of breathing and driving.

  41. #41
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:06 pm, rooster said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm, On-my-soap-box said:
    It took a long time to come up with an idea to do just the - tax the air.

    Soap,

    This is not new, its taken right out of the euro tax “the hell out of ‘em” book.

    From my experience, Germany has been taxing the air for years. Long before this global warming hoax started.

    Anyplace that is determined to be a resort is subject to this special tax.

    Of course you have church tax taken out of your check in relation to your denomination.

    The libs love europe, and europe loves the libs, ever wonder why? Birds of a feather.

  42. #42
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:07 pm, jrosenau said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm, j0 said:

    It was a “WTF?” moment when I saw this ad on tv last night.

    Newt disappoints me. :(

    I saw the ad last night to. Had the same reaction.

  43. #43
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:08 pm, Jbgood said:

    The Democratic party left Reagan. He became a Republican. The Democratic party left me. I became a Republican.
    The Republican party left me. Where to now? This is the worst presidential election cycle I have witnessed in my life. I have admired Newt for a long time. Now this.???

  44. #44
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm, bluesoc said:

    There was a time when Newt Gingrich and the Beltway GOP establishment could be counted on to defend free market environmentalism, property rights, and rational cost-benefit analyses

    Michelle, where did you get this idea? Check out Newt’s site. All he talks about are free market solutions and property rights. Or check out this interview he did at Slate .

    Here’s a quote from the interview: “I want to start by saying that I believe we need an entrepreneurial, science and technology oriented approach to the environment…a majority of Democrats, independents, and Republicans all agree that entrepreneurs can do more than bureaucrats to solve environmental challenges”

  45. #45
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Barry F. said:

    Pelosi and Gingrich: Washington birds of a feather and all that jazz. :roll:

    I saw it on television a few days ago on Fox News Channel, if I remember correctly. Then, a couple of days later, I saw the one with Sharpton and Robertson.

    Hopefully, as alluded above, this will nip the talk of Gingrich running on the Republican ticket in the bud.

  46. #46
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:13 pm, Boomer said:

    The very public service announcement that I talked about on the Celebrate: Earth Day thread. I feel like there are no conservatives left in the halls of government except for a very small and shrinking minority. :(

  47. #47
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:14 pm, rooster said:

    Hopefully, as alluded above, this will nip the talk of Gingrich running on the Republican ticket in the bud.

    Amen, my brother from another mother!

  48. #48
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:15 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I’ll be sending Newt’s book back to the conservative bookclub. No way I’m paying for it now. Everyone has just gone completely mad.

  49. #49
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, geminicontender said:

    Unfortunately Newt is showing his RINO side. This is very unfortunate, especially with all the news against global warming finally showing its face.

  50. #50
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, John Ansell said:

    Thanks for all the comments. I don’t believe in this hype, I just see that we can fight fire with fire. Cut taxes all in the name of gorebal warming. How would the lefties not pass something for gorebal warminng?

  51. #51
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:16 pm, tomk59 said:

    I gotta love it. This site and Hot Air, how many times have we seen “Newt for President” and such. The guy is what he’s always been; all for Newt, no different or better then the rest.
    He’s a gadfly, running from station to station for his fees, and hey, buy my new book!
    The sooner you all realize that nearly all of these people are self serving parasites and do something about it at your local levels and at the polls, then you’re gonna keep being shocked by the obvious.

  52. #52
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:17 pm, Ahh a Lion! said:

    Hopefully, as alluded above, this will nip the talk of Gingrich running on the Republican ticket in the bud.

    It didn’t stop McCain.

  53. #53
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:19 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I haven’t seen any of these commercials, I must be doing something right. Woohoo!!

  54. #54
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Hadenough said:

    No shock or mystery here.

    Newt= Old corrupt Republican party.
    Pelosi= New corrupt Demolican party.

  55. #55
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:23 pm, DirkBelig said:

    We haven’t had a hurricane worthy of the designation in the two years since Katrina and Vancouver just had their latest snowfall ever. The hysteria about global warming is being disproved by Mother Nature herself and where are those who are willing to speak Truth to the eco-terrorists like Al Gore? We used to be able to depend on CONSERVATIVES like McCain and Gingrich, but they have decided to slurp from the Treason Media’s Kool-Aid nozzles in the futile hope that they will then be loved. Stupid fools. We are lost.

  56. #56
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:26 pm, libocrat said:

    I remember The Reverend Bobby Knight speaking on this subject.
    “”"I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it. …”"
    I’m not enjoying it. I’m white, I’m bitter, I’m Christian and I’m clinging to my guns.

  57. #57
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:27 pm, NJRepublican said:

    I know! I saw it during a commercial break on FNC the other night and nearly lost dinner. Eck!

  58. #58
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:29 pm, PoeMangonel said:

    Now I am green today too - from nausea. Farewell, Newt. It was fun.

    Can anyone tell me what the color of common sense is?

  59. #59
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Papa Louie said:

    One thing is for certain, this is not an example of Left and Right coming together over Global Warming. Pelosi has not budged an inch, Newt has completely capitulated to the Left on this issue. Its bad enough that the Left wants to surrender in the war on terrorism, but some on the Right want to surrender to the cowards on the Left. What spineless RINO’s! The only problem Global Warming has created is insanity!

  60. #60
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:36 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Everybody wants their piece of the global warming pie. I hope they choke on it. I cannot afford this crap. I’m trying to fix up the affordable house my husband and I bought instead of the house on the lake. Which if we had bought and couldn’t afford it, my liberal superheroes could swoop in and fly all of my problems away. Damn me for being responsible…

  61. #61
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:38 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I saw this commercial on The History Channel last night and really wanted to vomit.

    How many “conservatives” are going to turn turncoat? I may never vote Republican again!

  62. #62
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:38 pm, JT said:

    Saw it last night. Ugh! What is with these Republicans acting like/becoming nutroots?

  63. #63
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:41 pm, USMCgramma said:

    I thought my husband was joking until I saw and heard this sickening video clip. We’ve been sold out by another phony conservative Republican Fox News contributor.

  64. #64
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:48 pm, mattm said:

    You know what a dog/cat does and sounds like right before it is about to barf? That’s what I feel like now.

  65. #65
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:49 pm, Old Scout said:

    He couldn’t pass up the money or the publicity.

    And I guess he felt that he didn’t say anything terribly bad:

    “Our country must take action to address climate change.”

    The debate these days is about whether or not there’s climate change actually happening, and what’s causing it. So, speaking as a true politician, he didn’t actually say that there was climate change due to the usual suspects - rather, we should address climate change.

  66. #66
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:51 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    rrb # 26
    You pracically took the words right out of my updated response.
    Thanks

  67. #67
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    …practically…

  68. #68
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:53 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    Someday I’ll be able to proof w/o enlarged print :-)

  69. #69
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm, geokstr said:

    What taxes are you talking about???? Companies have to earn a profit in order to be taxed.

    Wrong.

    Government has invented many more ingenious ways to vacuum money out of the pockets of the citizenry than merely “income” taxes. Do you think if the oil companies and/or cigarette manufacturers were losing money, the government would rescind or even temporarily suspend their hefty share of the price of a gallon/pack? Hardly.

    The taxes on “green” companies would simply be another component of the “price” to the public, regardless of the profitability of the product/service. Since using the products/services would then be mandated by law, like having a required percent of ethanol in gasoline by year 20XX, the public would not even have the option of making their own spending choices. Suspension of the practice of capitalism has long been an underlying goal of the ecofreaks anyway.

    The tax component of the price of these two products (and there are many others, like alcohol) is already so large that the “profit” per unit to government is many multiples higher than that earned by the manufacturers themselves.

    And the government does absolutely nothing to “earn” their take, except to shovel the money into the bottomless pit in Washington. In fact, in the case of the oil companies in particular, it does everything it possibly can to make it more difficult for them to invest in future profit-making opportunities, like Anwar and off-shore drilling, or exploring the vast reserves under the western United States, or even building more refineries.

  70. #70
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm, tropicalwave12 said:

    I think this is a sign of the Apocolypse. The End is truly near.

  71. #71
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm, babbledabble said:

    Repeat something often enough (even if it’s pure BS) & pretty soon people will begin to believe it.

  72. #72
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:01 pm, Papa Louie said:

    The main breeding season for newts is between the months of February and June.

    Oh, thats what’s going on here. Newt is just trying to impress liberal chicks by pretending to be green. After his hormones subside in June, he’ll come back to his senses and try to restore his damaged reputation. Sorry Newt, I don’t care if you were blinded by raging hormons. You made your bed with Polosi, now you can lie in it.

  73. #73
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:02 pm, bear1909 said:

    These dolts can bloat and fester all they want.

    When it comes down to it, technology and fuels are about to morph out of the reach of Pelosi Galore’s and Bewt’s cognizance.

    The morphing of technology and fuels is based on something oil corporations have bet their survival on- real science done by real scientists who can’t make sh*t up and then quote moral platitudes to justify their chicanery.

    Gore’s “Climate Change” horse hockey has been discredited by real science. The dry bones of Gore’s Nobel theories are rattling in embarassing timbre as we speak.

    The tax effort will collapse as oil corporations and automakers begin to show cards they haven’t just yet, and new ways of looking at an old problem come to the fore.

    And that impossible Peanut Head from Georgia finally kicks off….remember his solution to the “energy crisis” of the 70s? Wear a sweater! LMAO And he was a nuclear engineer?

    OY!

  74. #74
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:14 pm, Mister P said:

    Just one more confirmation I have held for years. There is NO Difference between Republicans and Democrats. It is just one big scam.

  75. #75
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:14 pm, love2rumba said:

    I think it is time for conservatives to seriously consider leaving the republican party.

    When you have Bob Barr snd Mike Gravel of Alaska joining the Libertarians- individuals with serious political experience-and the Republicans all but caving in the Left on Illegal Immigration and global warming, it is time to take stock and see if it is worth it for us conservatives to continue supporting a party that loves our vote and then tries to screw us with it once they are in office.

    In other words I already see a re-establishment of political equilibrium, but this time away from the Republicans,and to lesser extent the Democrats, but to what?

    Can I fully swallow ALL that the Libertarians go for? Hmmm….The thought is increasingly tempting.

  76. #76
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:16 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    So much for global warming. Earth Day festivities went ahead despite the blast of frigid weather yesterday.

    Vendors and presenters from various eco-friendly groups, including Bullfrog Power, CO2 Reduction Edmonton and the local solar energy society, crammed into a lone tent in Hawrelak Park after a blizzard forced them to abandon their original locations.
    Organizers crammed over 40 groups in a space that would normally be occupied by half that number. Presenters’ booths were initially planned to have been spread out between at least five tents, with far larger displays.

    “We’re normally here with a lineup of cyclists for our free bike repair service. No bikers came today. Big surprise,” said Chris Field of Mountain Equipment Co-Op.

    [Emphasis is mine.] I guess the blizzard was magically connected with global worming as well.

  77. #77
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:24 pm, bigterpfan said:

    My 2 cents on this matter.

    I’m hardly a scientist, but I’m certainly not as certain as the consensus seems to be around here that human conduct can’t bring about change in the environment. Around these parts, the downtown area is usually 10 or so degrees warmer than the areas surrounding the city. Why? It seems to me that it has something to with the densities of the building in the downtown area. Isn’t it possible that “global warming” or “climate change” just a larger-scale version of this heat-island effect, i.e., human conduct effecting “natural” temperatures?

    Also, it seems to me that the desire to develop alternative fuels and tax incentives for such development is an idea which should cut across party lines and politics.

  78. #78
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:25 pm, Dan Lee said:

    For the rest of my life, I will look back to this example to demonstrate for younger people the difference between:

    “Conservative” & “Conservative POLITICIAN..”

    ~ Dan Lee

  79. #79
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:29 pm, wighttrasch said:

    I was joking (re:tax the hell out of them), as I’m sure you understood. Using absurdity to illustrate a point, as Rush would say. There were only two options given. There is another way–drill for the oil that we know is there.

  80. #80
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:29 pm, John Ansell said:

    Here is a recent response from Newt himself:

    The Gingrich-Pelosi Climate Change Ad: Why I Took Part
    Many of you have written to me to ask why I recently taped an advertisement with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for The Alliance for Climate Protection, a group founded by former Vice President Al Gore.

    I completely understand why many of you would have questions about this, so I want to take this opportunity to explain my reasons. First of all, I want to be clear: I don’t think that we have conclusive proof of global warming. And I don’t think we have conclusive proof that humans are at the center of it.

    But here’s what we do know. There is an important debate going on right now over the right energy policy, the right environmental policy, and making sure we do the right things for our future and the future of our children and grandchildren. Conservatives are missing from this debate, and I think that’s a mistake. When it comes to preserving our environment for future generations, we can’t have a slogan of “Just yell no!”

    I have a different view. I think it’s important to be on the stage, to engage in the debate, and to communicate our position clearly. There is a big difference between left-wing environmentalism that wants higher taxes, bigger government., more bureaucracy, more regulation, more red tape, and more litigation and a Green Conservatism that wants to use science, technology, innovation, entrepreneurs, and prizes to find a way to creatively invent the kind of environmental future we all want to live in. Unless we start making the case for the latter, we’re going to get the former. That’s why I took part in the ad.

    You can also get more information by looking at Contract with the Earth

  81. #81
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:36 pm, jbjm said:

    Makes me wonder what companies are in Newt’s financial portfolio?

  82. #82
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:39 pm, JohnS said:

    How is this “coming together” when Pelosi doesn’t move an inch? The only people moving are the “conservatives”, who are moving drastically to the left!. We will never see Liberals move to the right to solve a BS problem. That is it for me with Newt Gingrich. He has good ideas, but this is the last straw. It is like Rush says…why do we except these Liberal premises? Especially when the jury is still out on man-made Global Warming. What a crock. I lost all respect for Newt here.

  83. #83
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm, Jim M. said:

    A stark reminder that, first and foremost, Newt is a politician. And like all politicians, they have an irresistable, almost Pavlovian, response to the almighty dollar or to opportunities that reverse their growing irrelevancy. I believe I even saw his mouth watering while sitting next to Pelosi.

  84. #84
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm, emjem24 said:

    Yep, when I saw this ad with Pelosi and Gingrich, I was pretty nauseous. I guess Newt really misses the limelight and if Pelosi puts on one more coating of makeup she’ll look positively inert (okay that’s her most of the time). ;-)

    Newt also misunderstands even underestimates the intelligence of everyday conservatives. For him to cozy up to Pelosi because he thinks that no other conservative will is just a joke. The thing that Newt is missing is that he’s accommodating this insane movement through engagement. It’s like Carter talking with Hamas- what’s the ultimate outcome of such a pairing?

    Newt really missed the mark on this one. For him to think that Conservatives aren’t aware of the environment and ways to conserve really implies why his tenure as House Speaker didn’t last all that long. :mad:

  85. #85
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:01 pm, NavyMom said:

    Where, where, WHERE are the statesmen our country so desperately needs today? Sigh. I guess I’ll have to content myself with watching old C-Span footage of the Gipper and savor the glory days.

  86. #86
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:07 pm, James Felix said:

    This is a little off topic, I know, but…

    with Heath Ledger’s tragic death has anyone tapped Pelosi to play The Joker in any subsequent Batman movies? She looks like she could pull it off with minimal makeup.

  87. #87
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    et tu Newt? The GOP is not even a shell of it’s former, somewhat conservative, self.

  88. #88
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm, ahraley said:

    I am …. …. …. speechless.

    Newt??? Wake up and smell the Kool Aid!

  89. #89
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Jbgood said:

    Newt said, “I have a different view. I think it’s important to be on the stage, to engage in the debate, and to communicate our position clearly.”

    That wouldn’t be so bad as long as our position was there is no such thing as man made global warming. It seems to me we are simply crossing the aisle one more time while the democrats stand their ground.

    I’ll wait and see before I make anymore judgements about Newt. I don’t expect much, other than moving closer to the dems on this or any other issue.

  90. #90
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:50 pm, pabarge said:

    Newt? You’re dead to me, dude.

    Adios. It’s been nice, but now it’s time to crawl back under your rock.

  91. #91
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:14 pm, Trunk Monkey said:

    He is just getting paid like the “Provides services for money” he is.

    He could not beat them so he joins them.

  92. #92
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:17 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    “We don’t always see eye-to-eye, but we do agree that the government can ride roughshod over you roobs because you’ll believe any of the tripe we sell you, and you will buy it with a smile on your face.”

    How much is this guy getting to sell us up the river?

  93. #93
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:26 pm, Mohawk said:

    I have to say when I saw this last night I was like wth is newt doing on the same couch with “that women”.

    Now I have to write newt off as well!

  94. #94
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 4:50 pm, ScottyDog said:

    Newt is being exposed for the Rockefeller Republican he always has been and his CFR agenda is on full display.He is promoting the same elitist agenda on the man made Global Warming Hoax.
    He has just repacked the name, “Green Conservatism” using the spin that we must be in the debate.
    From his own website there is this:.

    “As a key part of green prosperity and green development, there has to be a green energy strategy which is designed to enable the human race to make the transition from historic fossil fuels which dramatically improved the quality of life over the pre-industrial period to a new clean generation of energy which will: enable us in national security terms to be liberated from dependence on dangerous dictatorships; enable us in economic terms to be effective in worldwide competition; and enable us in environmental terms to provide for a much cleaner and healthier future.”

    There is absolutely no evidence that “Fossil Fuels” are in any way raising the temperature of the earth yet he is claiming that we must make the transition to some magical alternative fuel that will benefit man kind. There is no alternative fuel on the horizon and probably will not be in the next 50 years.

    When he was in Congress, he could have worked to stop Congress from capping oil wells letting the Government take over the oil industry in America. We have more oil in the USA than we could possibly use but our own Congress has placed it all off limits due to “environmental” concerns, which I think is just a cover for the Government taking over the oil industry. (They already make more money than the oil companies in taxing them)

    The Energy Crisis has been created by our own Government and IMHO it is criminal that it is allowed to continue. Our economy is being destroyed as we speak.

    The ethanol mandates that GWB recently signed into law are resulting in Global Food shortages and famine in some third world countries. Because of the Ethanol fuel mandates alone, Food prices have increased by 37% last year because the price of corn that is used to make ethanol has tripled in price.

    If we allowed the North Slope of Alaska to be opened to Domestic production and not just ANWAR, we would see crude oil prices of $10-15 dollars a barrel. It is all supply and demand.

    What kind of insanity allows this hoax to continue under the name of Global Warming or Environmentalism?

  95. #95
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm, John Ansell said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Jbgood said: That wouldn’t be so bad as long as our position was there is no such thing as man made global warming.

    Good point. As you can see in Newt’s response that I posted, he states he doesn’t think it’s man made. I admit, I’m a huge Newt fan and I was worried when I first started seeing this issue growing on his site, but after reading much of what he’s thinking, it’s not as bad as people are trying to make it.

    I’m glad to see that you are willing to keep an open mind.

  96. #96
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:10 pm, rooster said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm, Jim M. said:

    I believe I even saw his mouth watering while sitting next to Pelosi.

    Damn Jim, I bout lost my lunch, that was disgusting!

    Good riddance Newt, bad enough that you sell out for the hoax, but to think you fawn over Pelosi? EEEEEEEEWWWWWWW!

  97. #97
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:27 pm, frayed said:

    When I read Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn’s book, “Breach of Trust”, it was a real eye opener about Newt, Lott, and the GOP leadership in congress. Coburn was one of the “Class of 94″ Congressmen “eager to fullfill” Newt Gingrich’s, “Contract With America.” The title of the book says it all. I highly recommend reading his book if you can stand knowing what really goes on in the swamp. The founding fathers warned us over and over that bad things could still happen to the best laid plans, and they have.

  98. #98
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:35 pm, graysonret said:

    I saw that on tv today. Boy, was I disappointed. Newt lost a lot of points with me today. Stick with historical novels, Newt. You’re much better at that, than global warming.

  99. #99
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:40 pm, fred5676 said:

    Look at the sofa cushions!!! Tectonic plate shift!!!

    STOP CONTINENTAL DRIFT!

  100. #100
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:43 pm, ScottyDog said:

    John Ansell said:
    I first started seeing this issue growing on his site, but after reading much of what he’s thinking, it’s not as bad as people are trying to make it.

    I think it is far worse than you think.

    Per Newt’s Statement:

    First of all, I want to be clear: I don’t think that we have conclusive proof of global warming. And I don’t think we have conclusive proof that humans are at the center of it.

    Translation, even though there is not any conclusive proof, I just capitulated to sit with Nancy Pelosi and allow the same idiotic green issues to be advanced by the DNC.

  101. #101
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:46 pm, rooster said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:27 pm, frayed said:

    frayed,

    I believe Coburn has many shades like a chameleon. I believe he is leading a bill to outsource our M4’s (Our Troops Weapons) from where they have been made by Americans in Conneticut to a company in Germany.

    If this turns out to be true, I wouldn’t read a newsletter from Coburn, let alone buy one of his books.

  102. #102
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 6:17 pm, corkie said:

    I’m 100% in favor of establishing sound, logic energy policy. I’m also in favor of establishing a sound, logical environmental policy.

    However, I will not engage in these discussions as long as science and engineering are ignored.

    Now, even if we assume that AGW is a fact, no alternative energy plans or conservation plans show any promise.

    This country needs to make a strong push for nuclear power now. The AGW crowd and energy independence crowd should both love this idea.

    The plan should be;

    1. Design two types of plants. The first type should be large. The second type should be small and use fuel recycled from the first type.

    2. Keep the two designs highly uniform. This will keep regulation cheaper and safer.

    3. Assure the nuclear power industry that it will be allowed to continue recycling nuclear fuel. (In other words, assure against another Jimmy Carter type ban.)

    4. Package up the spent recycled fuel into containers and dump them into a desert floor in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. This will have no negative ecological impact at all.

  103. #103
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 6:28 pm, John Ansell said:

    On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:43 pm, ScottyDog #100

    I see your point and I was not happy that he sat there with San Fran Nan either. But I don’t think it’s worth throwing him under the bus for it.

    This ad campaign is not only going to be with Newt and Nancy but other Conservatives with other Lefties.

    My main issue this election cycle is stopping the illegal invaders. I compare Newt’s plan on that to Mcinsane’s plan for amnesty and this issue is not worth losing a solid plan to stop the invaders from coming.

    So, basically I don’t have a dog in this election since all 3 are for amnesty. (Also, all three are on board with Gorebal warming) We’re screwed.

  104. #104
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 6:33 pm, restlessindependent said:

    Ya, I’m feelin’ green today…from the nausea caused by watching this disgusting propaganda.

  105. #105
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 8:17 pm, RoyceB said:

    Considering the poor alternatives we have among the three current Republican and Democrat candidates, I’m moving to the Constitution Party for the presidential vote. Alan Keyes is a much better choice for president than anyone else who is running. If you want to hear his speech on why he has left the Republican party, visit his web site at http://www.alankeyes.com

  106. #106
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 9:03 pm, simon77047 said:

    I used to write to my Senator from Missouri begging her to read the true science of climate change, She wrote back and told me the facts were in and there was no sense in arguing about it. She plans to vote to save the farmers this summer with her outrageous global warming BS soon to be a hot topic in our Wonder senate. I’m sure our Wonder president, W, will sign off especially now that Newt is on board.

  107. #107
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 9:05 pm, frayed said:

    rooster,

    You might want to read this article at:
    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/12/army_carbine_dusttest_071217/ to see what Coburn’s concerns are.

    • XM8: 127 stoppages.

    • MK16 SCAR Light: 226 stoppages.

    • 416: 233 stoppages.

    • M4: 882 stoppages.

  108. #108
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 9:26 pm, rooster said:

    frayed,
    There were 2 different results in the article. Who commissioned the tests?

    If the weapon is not up to snuff, it should be modified and fixed, not outsourced to another country. We’ve outsourced everything and it needs to stop.

  109. #109
    On April 22nd, 2008 at 11:21 pm, Newts Wally said:

    Newt Blog from Newt.Org (No - I’m not saying I agree with the rational thought here - but here it is for your viewing pleasure.)

    “Many of you have written to me to ask why I recently taped an advertisement with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for The Alliance for Climate Protection, a group founded by former Vice President Al Gore.

    I completely understand why many of you would have questions about this, so I want to take this opportunity to explain my reasons. First of all, I want to be clear: I don’t think that we have conclusive proof of global warming. And I don’t think we have conclusive proof that humans are at the center of it.

    But here’s what we do know. There is an important debate going on right now over the right energy policy, the right environmental policy, and making sure we do the right things for our future and the future of our children and grandchildren. Conservatives are missing from this debate, and I think that’s a mistake. When it comes to preserving our environment for future generations, we can’t have a slogan of “Just yell no!”

    I have a different view. I think it’s important to be on the stage, to engage in the debate, and to communicate our position clearly. There is a big difference between left-wing environmentalism that wants higher taxes, bigger government., more bureaucracy, more regulation, more red tape, and more litigation and a Green Conservatism that wants to use science, technology, innovation, entrepreneurs, and prizes to find a way to creatively invent the kind of environmental future we all want to live in. Unless we start making the case for the latter, we’re going to get the former. That’s why I took part in the ad.

    Thank you for reading and visiting Newt.org”

    Newt

    ***************************************
    My Response Directly to Newt So He Can Read It ….

    “I hear ‘ya brother. I’m concerned on two fronts : A.) Nancy Pelosi - although you may need to work with her in the future - America does NOT - and her effectiveness & ratings are lower than well water - by you appearing with her - her ratings jumped 10 -15 points.

    B.) Now everytime a Conservative tells Al, Nancy or the other tree huggers of a by-gone era that could care less about our Quality of American Life - to “Pound Salt” on Man Made Global Warming - they (The Enemy) are going to remind us that you sat on the couch with Nancy “in agreement”. Put RINO-Democrat McCain on the Couch.

    Democrat-Socialist always screw Conservatives in the end. Now they have the Obama Bus as another weapon. :-)

    Not that it counts for much but - I’ll stand with ‘ya on the side of Technology, math, science, China is the Enemy of Earth too, “Ace” this soy-corn-et al going to inefficient biofuels and put OUR FOOD back on the dinner table and let’s drill like their is no tomorrow (because there isn’t) in ANWR, the Gulf etc to BUY US TIME TO CONVERT once and for all. For this, I’m with ya - no couch time necessary :-)

  110. #110
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 3:21 am, Ombre Rose said:

    How can anyone who has watched Newt be shocked?

    The time I saw him laughing uproariously at Sean Hannity, about 6 m onths before SHAMNESTY was pushed so hard last year - Fall of 2006 - Newt was siding completely with Alan Colmes, deriding Hannity for NOT BEING PRAGMATIC about the BORDER and ILLEGAL ALIENS and a PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP.

    I’ve never seen Newt more RELAXED and CONTENTED than when he was laughing at Sean’s total frustration as Sean felt he was watching Newt’s political career finish flushing down the “plumbing fixtures”.

    I was shockeed then - but it seems that was because *I focused too much on the Clinton’s during the Impeachment process and not enough on certain key GOP members like Newt and Fred Thompson, etc.

    McCain was easy back then - he always stuck out like a sore thumb.

    I think Newt is campaigning to McCain for VEEP!

    After all, McCain is the NEW “MOST CONSERVATIVE”.

  111. #111
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 4:12 am, frayed said:

    rooster,

    I think we got off topic from this thread. The point I was trying to make was that Coburn revealed a lot about the GOP leadership, including Newt. To my knowledge none of that was challenged by any of those he wrote about. I don’t think he is trying to outsource our arms manufacturing but is more concerned with the safety of the ones using those weapons in a life or death situation. It appears they have tried to get the manufacturer to improve reliability and ease of maintenance. He says he was approached by soldiers with complaints about it.

    I would think the Army commissioned it because the article cited states: “Weapons officials at the Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., exposed Colt Defense LLC’s M4, along with the Heckler & Koch XM8, FNH USA’s Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle and the H&K 416 to sandstorm conditions from late September to late November, firing 6,000 rounds through each test weapon.”

  112. #112
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 7:26 am, rooster said:

    frayed,
    It is off topic a little but, the more global warming regs pushed, the more jobs leave the USA. Hechler & Koch is the german firm I believe is the one that could get our M4 contract? I still say it is just as wrong as giving the air tanker deal to France, whose company has major, major backing and investment from Putin.

  113. #113
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Goodbye Newt; don’t let the door hit you on the way out. You may have had some good ideas in the past but this clearly indicates that you are easy to dupe.

  114. #114
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 8:32 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Ombre Rose said:

    … I think Newt is campaigning to McCain for VEEP!

    After all, McCain is the NEW “MOST CONSERVATIVE”.

    Yikes! Watch how fast I don’t show up at the polls this November to show these country club republicans what Reaganism actually means to me.

  115. #115
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 10:35 am, Mister P said:

    Alan Keyes is a much better choice for president than anyone else who is running

    Thanks to Keyes, Obama became senator of Illinois.

  116. #116
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 11:17 am, Mr.J said:

    Newt said, “I have a different view. I think it’s important to be on the stage, to engage in the debate, and to communicate our position clearly.”

    How was any of that accomplished in the ad? Other than being “on stage” … which I would argue is counterproductive to your message when the stage is shared with the likes of Pelosi.

  117. #117
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 11:19 am, secondsight said:

    Back to GE stock. Buy some. And maybe some Ford and GM. Who knows? Maybe they’ll score a new battery car and tax the be-jesus out of everyone that hasn’t bought their new toy. Nancy would love to do that.

    There’s nothing like the force of law to make companies profitable.

    Frankly, having these two turnips together in the same patch of the garden is scary. All sorts of mischief here.

  118. #118
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 12:08 pm, Mister P said:

    Sunspot activity has not resumed up after hitting an 11-year low in March last year, raising fears that — far from warming — the globe is about to return to an Ice Age, says an Australian-American scientist.

    Physicist Phil Chapman, the first native-born Australian to become an astronaut with NASA [he became an American citizen to join up, though he never went into space], said pictures from the U.S. Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) showed no spots on the sun.

    He said the world cooled quickly between January last year and January this year, by about 0.7 degrees Centigrade.

    For the Global Warming crowd. I know here in the midwest we had the coldest winter on record.

  119. #119
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 1:17 pm, av8tr said:

    Please, Newt, Just. Shut. Up.

    Go away. It’s very painful for the rest of us to see you kiss up to the left. You remind me of Eddie Haskell. Actually, I liked Eddie better. He was funny. And fictional.

    Climate change? Newt - wrap your brain around this. They’re called “seasons.” But that just doesn’t have a ring to it - Stop Seasons? Do your part to prevent seasons? Be a season-stopper?

  120. #120
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 2:59 pm, Trollman said:

    Rumor* has it that McCain and Hillary are going to star in the next ad, and end the commercial with a hug.

    *Rumor = completely made up, but sadly all too believable.

  121. #121
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 3:33 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Mister P said:

    Thanks to Keyes, Obama became senator of Illinois.

    Now hold on there.. WHERE would Obama be if not for a single Jerry Brown appointed LA Judge who thinks people’s SEALED divorce papers, papers that almost always include totally unsubstantiated mud-slinging accusations from one spouse against another, - deserve to be on the front page of the Chicago Tribune because the public really ought to be able learn what could very well be outright LIES from one spouse about the other?

    I’ll tell you where … NOWHERE!

    Don’t hang Allan Keyes - hang the useful idiots that subvert our privacy laws and ANY sense of morality in our country.

  122. #122
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 4:33 pm, Mister P said:

    I assume you are talking about the Ryans and their swinging escapades, that resulted in Ryan dropping out of the election and Keyes coming in.

    Then of course Keyes ran such a poor campaign, even the conservative downstate republicans voted for Obama.

  123. #123
    On April 23rd, 2008 at 5:15 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    So maybe Jack fondled his WIFE in public; big whoop - that compared to the outrage liberals have about what goes on in parades in San Francisco… not.

    There was no trial, there was no chance for rebuttal - only the accusation. It may have never happened at all and we’ll never know. John Bolton got borked; Jack Ryan got “borged”. Like Rush says, (sort of), with liberals it NEVER has anything to do with the facts - only the seriousness of the charge.

    It’s not much different than the classic, “How long has it been since you stopped beating your wife?”

  124. #124
    On April 28th, 2008 at 9:28 am, kurthanson said:

    I do believe “climate change” pod people are slowly taking over. I don’t think I’ll be able to fall asleep again…

  125. #125
    On April 28th, 2008 at 9:30 am, kurthanson said:

    My home town of Anchorage, Alaska, just saw some of its heaviest snowfall ever recorded in a single day. Yup, climate change is here!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The “No Excuses Energy Act”

June 10, 2008 02:41 PM by Michelle Malkin

73 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Your move, Nancy.

Senate votes to privatize its failing restaurant

June 9, 2008 10:01 PM by see-dubya

38 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

But wants to take over your family’s health care.

Nancy Pelosi said what?!

May 29, 2008 05:47 PM by see-dubya

123 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Thank goodness for Iran’s help in winning the war in Iraq!

FARC documents: they’re real, and they’re spectacular.

May 16, 2008 04:35 AM by see-dubya

50 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Hugo and Obama ought to be nervous.

Analyst: War in Iraq has strengthened U.S. international strategic position

April 25, 2008 11:03 PM by see-dubya

55 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Schools closed due to freezing weather: Hades Elementary, Gehenna Junior High. Colombia left out in the cold.

If you’re going to complain about gas prices, Nancy…

April 25, 2008 09:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

164 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Blink, blink.

Nancy Pelosi’s lost Biblical verse

April 24, 2008 10:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

175 Comments | 24 Trackbacks

“It is not in the Bible. There is nothing that even approximates that.”

Over to you, San Fran Nan. Hello? Nan?

April 22, 2008 08:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Gaseous.


Categories: Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich