On April 22nd, 2008 at 9:18 pm, tizzidale said:
This makes you special, how?
I’m just trying to emulate Michelle apparently.

There’s a lot more analysis and commentary in Michelle’s work than yours. Yours is just bitter and spiteful and comes across that way. The fact that you posted the link here proves that.

But when the king came in to look over the dinner guests, he saw a man there who was not dressed in wedding clothes, and he said to him, “Friend, how did you come in here without wedding clothes?” And the man was speechless. Then the king said to the servants, “Bind him hand and foot, and throw him into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” For many are called, but few are chosen. (Matthew 22:11-14)

John 10: 1
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/04/22/oklahoma-unemployment-way-down-will-media-look-why

Wow, you cherry pick sentences and then attempt to refute or make fun of them. This makes you special, how?

I’m just trying to emulate Michelle apparently.

mackerel snapping idiot

lmao

On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:38 pm, tizzidale said:

You don’t have to read it. And you don’t have to stifle your desire to call me names. Fair enough?

Wow, you cherry pick sentences and then attempt to refute or make fun of them. This makes you special, how?

Do you think we are obliged to watch you deride MM with your agitprop link and still stifle our desire to call you a mackerel snapping idiot?

You don’t have to read it. And you don’t have to stifle your desire to call me names. Fair enough?

On April 22nd, 2008 at 5:08 pm, tizzidale said at 114:

Well, Michelle is at it again.

Do you think we are obliged to watch you deride MM with your agitprop link and still stifle our desire to call you a mackerel snapping idiot?

But that doesn’t give you the right to assume that the current Holy Father is endorsing lawlessness.

Actually, given today’s context, my suspicions are sufficiently justified.

But I will have you know that I have every right to assume and say whatever I please. It is called freedom of speech and religion. Jesus taught separation of church and state, even though the Catholic church hasn’t always. Thankfully the Catholic church no longer wields political power.

We need conservative politicians who get the job done and not just talk mouthful like Tancredo.

This catechism you point to is as meaningful as having a law saying that if somebody robs someone or steals from them, have them sign a note saying they did bad and let them go for COMPASSION.

How is it compassionate to allow people (sometimes pregnant women) to wander in the desert in life threatening conditions because we have lured them here with the promise of citizenship? That is DANGEROUS for these people.

I also saw the O’Reilley priest and it was basically socialism 101. UNREPENTANT socialism 101. I just love it when they willingly spend other people’s money and deride you for not thinking they should be allowed. . . after all they’re CATHOLIC!

The priest on the factor said we should allow whoever wants to come here the ability to come here and be American citizens. As I said, it’s real nice of them to claim some moral superiority on how awful our laws are and how much we should give people who have no interest in anything but taking from us. That priest was an eye opener. . . and he didn’t seem to think he was being too radical to me.

APOLOGIZE! APOLOGIZE! APOLOGIZE! I think we have a candidate for Catholic Rage Boy, and his name is NBF. What say you NBF, got a picture of you looking real mad? Maybe in front of a Church or holding a Bible or a crucifix would add to the image appropriately.

what’s next, an ad with Ted Kennedy about the evils of border security?