Comments on: Aw, s**t: Yet another Billbo eruption

By: Straight_Talk_Luigi

Straight_Talk_Luigi — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:10:38 +0000

LGM LGM LGM LGM

Fair enough. Bill Clinton can be embarrassing, very embarrassing.

Still, he was a better President than Reagan or any of the Bushes. Balanced budget, rising middle class income (after inflation), job creation, military interventions with few American lives lost, … .

Military interventions that were unsuccessful!

Did he kill Osama? NO! We didn’t even have the right targets!

And what about former Yugoslavia? All bombing!

That’s why there were less casulties, and he didn’t have the stomach for more of somalia.

And a better president? Then why was he nearly impeached?

Sex in the oval office. Gotta love post-modern liberalism.

Even if that didn’t happen, he still is a baby-killer.

By: RetFireman

RetFireman — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:13:33 +0000

Well…we ended up getting the lie. Later, when confronted with having claimed Obama was using the race card, Clintin told a batch of reporters that he never saidthose words, and that it was just another attempt to slander ol Bill by claiming he did.

Yup…classic Billy-Boy indeed.

By: SHoward

SHoward — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:57:44 +0000

Man I wish I had gotten here sooner. I think I saw Soap’s roadsign on my last trip back home to Florida!

As for Slick — someone commented that he is likely suffering a post surgical complication. I tend to agree. What’s interesting is that the Hill-machine either isn’t smart enough or isn’t strong enough to stick a sock in his mouth.

Maybe if they tossed an intern at him….naw, that’d only work for a couple of minutes.

By: zorro

zorro — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:29:56 +0000

Any guesses on when Hill dumps the Slug named Bill?

By: floridaobserver

floridaobserver — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:10:50 +0000

Bill must be off his meds again.

By: D-Hoggs

D-Hoggs — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:04:07 +0000

I agree with you AlohaGuy. My point is that you are absolutely right and that there are tons of opportunities to rightly call bill out, so why cherry-pick a quote and mischaracterize what was said and to whom? I don’t like it when the left does it, and it doesn’t help for us to engage in it. Mahalo.

By: AlohaGuy

AlohaGuy — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:01:31 +0000

The LA Times and the Washington Post seem to have left the whole episode out, not just four words. I see what you're driving at, but don't agree that in this case it's that big a deal. And while it may seem like parroting to you, I had read several of the articles yeterday, and knew what it was reported he had said. My point was not simply to parrot Michelle, but that he has a temper and a short fuse, and I think he feels he doesn't have to take anything from anybody - "on that" or for any reason - and it can lead to, well who knows?

By: DBNinKY

DBNinKY — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:54:19 +0000

Soap #84: ~~Road~~ Sign-language

Way cool, Soap!

By: D-Hoggs

D-Hoggs — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:24:09 +0000

Aloha guy: Why did Michelle leave out the …”on that, do you?” Instead making it out to sound like Clinton said, to the radio host, that he shouldn’t have to take any shit from anyone. She has clearly cherry-picked the quote for her own ends, and flat out mischaracterizes that he said it to the radio host. I don’t know how you don’t see that. Four little words, why leave them out?

By: On-my-soap-box

On-my-soap-box — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:06:29 +0000

AlohaGuy,

ROFLMBO – thanks! I am feeling the love today!

By: Beacon Street Journal » Blog Archive » Hillary Takes Pennsylvania: The Democrats’ Intra-Party Identity Politics Strife Continues

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:06:29 +0000

[...] finger-wagging fury. For the remainder of the contest, much to the chagrin of his former enablers, Bill Clinton will not be muzzled, he will not be restrained. The damage he will continue to inflict on Obama as well as the party [...]

By: AlohaGuy

AlohaGuy — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:03:49 +0000

Just for you Soap

By: AlohaGuy

AlohaGuy — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:51:35 +0000

He was caught, at the end of the interview when he apparently thought he was off the microphone, saying, “I don’t think I should take any” — he then used an expletive — “from anybody on that, do you?”

He was caught later, when he apparently thought he was off the microphone, saying, "I don't think I should take any" — he then used an expletive — "from anybody on that, do you?"

After the phone interview, a stray comment of his on the issue was also recorded before he hung up: "I don't think I should take any s*** from anybody on that, do you?"

#82, quoting (parroting) Michelle: “I don’t think I should take any s–t from anybody.”

Sure, the NY Times, Seattle Times and CNN might be construed as dubious sources, but D-Hoggs, what's the big misquote you're excited about?

By: dakine

dakine — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:49:24 +0000

30, the content of most of my posts to answer your question. I simply defend lgm’s right to disagree.

Thanks Yashmak.

soap, gotta give credit where it’s due. Very funny stuff.

Blind, not so much.

By: Yashmak

Yashmak — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:47:57 +0000

Dakine,
What’s the difference between your posts and lgm’s?

Easy; dakine is right, lgm is not.