<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIA to put kibosh on faith-based North Korea nuclear policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:06:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Faith-Based North Korea Nuke Policy Revised</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-300049</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Faith-Based North Korea Nuke Policy Revised</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-300049</guid>
		<description>[...] was also gratified to see that, contrary to the analysis I quoted here, Congress was paying attention to this threat. A letter from 14 Republican Senators concerned about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was also gratified to see that, contrary to the analysis I quoted here, Congress was paying attention to this threat. A letter from 14 Republican Senators concerned about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dropping the Dime on the Assad/Kim Nuclear Lovefest : The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-298538</link>
		<dc:creator>Dropping the Dime on the Assad/Kim Nuclear Lovefest : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-298538</guid>
		<description>[...] who&#8217;s keeping things on a rolling boil at Michelle Malkin&#8217;s place says:  Look, I’ll be the first to admit there’s probably a lot going on in the nuclear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who&#8217;s keeping things on a rolling boil at Michelle Malkin&#8217;s place says:  Look, I’ll be the first to admit there’s probably a lot going on in the nuclear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297994</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297994</guid>
		<description>Having spent four years as a US National Escort for the INF and START treaties in the mid-late 90s I have a really good idea of how a non-proliferation agreement should work between two nation states.  Physical on-site inspection with short notice declarations of intent to inspect (72 hours) and an even shorter notice (12 hours) to declare the site to be inspected allowing the host nation to transport the inspection team to the declared site is the only way to validate that your partner in the agreement is keeping their end of the contract.  Also all operations at the inspection site shut down 1 hour after the declaration is made.  This type of inspection protocol worked out pretty good between the former Soviet Union and the US.

We already know that the North Koreans smoked the Clinton Administration on the last agreement this country had with them so why the heck would we want another deal unless it allows real verification through physical on-site inspection of suspect facilities.  Without the ability to verify compliance and their track record of trying to smuggle missile &amp; nuclear technologies why have any non-proliferation agreement at all.  Anyone remember the freighter found to be housing missiles a few years ago the French Navy found?  Now we have credible evidence that the suspected Nuclear Plant in Syria the Israeli Air Force was good enough to wipe off the face of the planet was a joint Syrian-North Korean venture.   Since we can’t trust the oppressive government of Kim Jun Il as far as we can throw the little tyrant why would any rational person want to be the next sucker in his “let’s make a deal” scheme.  

The smartest process we had going was the joint nation talks we had going on using China and Russia to keep the pressure on this Communist regime.  It almost sounds like Bush really is extremely desperate to leave a legacy if he is willing to enter into an almost suicidal non-proliferation treaty on a faith-basis with a government proven to lie like a rug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spent four years as a US National Escort for the INF and START treaties in the mid-late 90s I have a really good idea of how a non-proliferation agreement should work between two nation states.  Physical on-site inspection with short notice declarations of intent to inspect (72 hours) and an even shorter notice (12 hours) to declare the site to be inspected allowing the host nation to transport the inspection team to the declared site is the only way to validate that your partner in the agreement is keeping their end of the contract.  Also all operations at the inspection site shut down 1 hour after the declaration is made.  This type of inspection protocol worked out pretty good between the former Soviet Union and the US.</p>
<p>We already know that the North Koreans smoked the Clinton Administration on the last agreement this country had with them so why the heck would we want another deal unless it allows real verification through physical on-site inspection of suspect facilities.  Without the ability to verify compliance and their track record of trying to smuggle missile &amp; nuclear technologies why have any non-proliferation agreement at all.  Anyone remember the freighter found to be housing missiles a few years ago the French Navy found?  Now we have credible evidence that the suspected Nuclear Plant in Syria the Israeli Air Force was good enough to wipe off the face of the planet was a joint Syrian-North Korean venture.   Since we can’t trust the oppressive government of Kim Jun Il as far as we can throw the little tyrant why would any rational person want to be the next sucker in his “let’s make a deal” scheme.  </p>
<p>The smartest process we had going was the joint nation talks we had going on using China and Russia to keep the pressure on this Communist regime.  It almost sounds like Bush really is extremely desperate to leave a legacy if he is willing to enter into an almost suicidal non-proliferation treaty on a faith-basis with a government proven to lie like a rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahh a Lion!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahh a Lion!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297988</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There may be some good reasons for the administration to do what it’s doing&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Talk about faith-based - trust but verify - Bush fails.

North Korea - Exposing the stupidity of Iraq&#039;s Invasion since &#039;The Axis of Evil&#039; SOTU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There may be some good reasons for the administration to do what it’s doing</p></blockquote>
<p>Talk about faith-based &#8211; trust but verify &#8211; Bush fails.</p>
<p>North Korea &#8211; Exposing the stupidity of Iraq&#8217;s Invasion since &#8216;The Axis of Evil&#8217; SOTU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: undrseige247</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297980</link>
		<dc:creator>undrseige247</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297980</guid>
		<description>October 2006:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The US said intelligence had detected a seismic event at a suspected test site [in North Korea] and Russia said it was &quot;100% certain&quot; a nuclear test had occurred.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Why give them the chance to refine their technology? The next &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6032525.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;test&lt;/a&gt;&quot; will be more efficient and possibly a larger yield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October 2006:</p>
<blockquote><p>The US said intelligence had detected a seismic event at a suspected test site [in North Korea] and Russia said it was &#8220;100% certain&#8221; a nuclear test had occurred.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why give them the chance to refine their technology? The next &#8220;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6032525.stm" rel="nofollow">test</a>&#8221; will be more efficient and possibly a larger yield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: see-dubya</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297963</link>
		<dc:creator>see-dubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297963</guid>
		<description>I thought about the New York Times angle.

But I&#039;ve noticed that their scoops of classified info tend to run in a &lt;em&gt;particular direction&lt;/em&gt;.  So we may be safe here--unless the NSA was monitoring someone&#039;s phone call of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought about the New York Times angle.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve noticed that their scoops of classified info tend to run in a <em>particular direction</em>.  So we may be safe here&#8211;unless the NSA was monitoring someone&#8217;s phone call of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind_Mule</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297944</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind_Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297944</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By holding closed, classified briefings for members of several congressional committees,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Right, we will be reading the minutes of the meeting in the New Dork Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By holding closed, classified briefings for members of several congressional committees,</p></blockquote>
<p>Right, we will be reading the minutes of the meeting in the New Dork Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ansell</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297943</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297943</guid>
		<description>Send in Carter, He&#039;ll fix it.

/sarc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send in Carter, He&#8217;ll fix it.</p>
<p>/sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind_Mule</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297939</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind_Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297939</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where my old post is but I called this one when Isreal bombed the site. This is what I thought at the time, N. Korea has nuclear technology, Iran has missle technology, the NKs were helping syria obtain the means to produce nuclear warheads and Iran will give them missle technology, marry the two together what do you have.

Nuclear Warheads + Missles = Nuclear anhiliation of Isreal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know where my old post is but I called this one when Isreal bombed the site. This is what I thought at the time, N. Korea has nuclear technology, Iran has missle technology, the NKs were helping syria obtain the means to produce nuclear warheads and Iran will give them missle technology, marry the two together what do you have.</p>
<p>Nuclear Warheads + Missles = Nuclear anhiliation of Isreal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: see-dubya</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297931</link>
		<dc:creator>see-dubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297931</guid>
		<description>meatpie--  Sure, there&#039;s such a thing as unnecessary saber-rattling, and I&#039;m not advocating an attack on North Korea or anything.  But if there aren&#039;t consequences  of some sort for setting up a plutonium shop in Syria--and they&#039;re rewarded for it--well, that saber&#039;s rusted tight in the scabbard.

WalterC--  In my earlier post linked at the top I  agreed with you on one point: that hey, at least we know W isn&#039;t sitting around obsessing about his legacy like Clinton did.

Now I&#039;m not so sure.  I think he may be trying hard to say he signed a non-proliferation deal with North Korea.    I think he might be trying too hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meatpie&#8211;  Sure, there&#8217;s such a thing as unnecessary saber-rattling, and I&#8217;m not advocating an attack on North Korea or anything.  But if there aren&#8217;t consequences  of some sort for setting up a plutonium shop in Syria&#8211;and they&#8217;re rewarded for it&#8211;well, that saber&#8217;s rusted tight in the scabbard.</p>
<p>WalterC&#8211;  In my earlier post linked at the top I  agreed with you on one point: that hey, at least we know W isn&#8217;t sitting around obsessing about his legacy like Clinton did.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not so sure.  I think he may be trying hard to say he signed a non-proliferation deal with North Korea.    I think he might be trying too hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297913</link>
		<dc:creator>walterc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297913</guid>
		<description>Is it me, or is the current administration pulling all the stops in trying to accomplish ANYTHING positive to hold out as it&#039;s legacy?

The pali/Israeli thing doesn&#039;t seem to be working out, the Afghanistan/Iraq/Al Qaeda thing isn&#039;t going to be resolved in time, so now they are trying to put together a &quot;workable solution&quot; to the North Korean nuclear issue.

Face it GW, your presidential legacy will be open borders, attacking the wrong country (Iraq) and the loss of both houses to the demoncrats.

The attack of 9/11, no terrorist attacks in 7 years, and tax cuts that stimulated the economy will be overshadowed by Iraq, $3+ gas prices, still can&#039;t find &lt;strike&gt;Obama&lt;/strike&gt;Osama and a republican congress that spends money like drunken sailors on shore leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it me, or is the current administration pulling all the stops in trying to accomplish ANYTHING positive to hold out as it&#8217;s legacy?</p>
<p>The pali/Israeli thing doesn&#8217;t seem to be working out, the Afghanistan/Iraq/Al Qaeda thing isn&#8217;t going to be resolved in time, so now they are trying to put together a &#8220;workable solution&#8221; to the North Korean nuclear issue.</p>
<p>Face it GW, your presidential legacy will be open borders, attacking the wrong country (Iraq) and the loss of both houses to the demoncrats.</p>
<p>The attack of 9/11, no terrorist attacks in 7 years, and tax cuts that stimulated the economy will be overshadowed by Iraq, $3+ gas prices, still can&#8217;t find <strike>Obama</strike>Osama and a republican congress that spends money like drunken sailors on shore leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvw</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297902</link>
		<dc:creator>bvw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297902</guid>
		<description>DEFSEC Gates&#039; face lit up brightly and suddenly today in the Petraeus presser when a media person asked when the details of the Syrian WMD would be released to the public, &quot;Soon ...  soon!&quot; he smiled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEFSEC Gates&#8217; face lit up brightly and suddenly today in the Petraeus presser when a media person asked when the details of the Syrian WMD would be released to the public, &#8220;Soon &#8230;  soon!&#8221; he smiled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shimauma2</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297878</link>
		<dc:creator>shimauma2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297878</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CIA is going to brief Congress &lt;b&gt;(keeping the details classified)&lt;/b&gt; on the fact that it really was North Korea giving plutonium technology to Syria&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Keeping details classified is not a thing that congress does well at any rate just like paying attention. Am I silly to think congress&#039;s judgement on anything where they would need to pay attention is worrisome?

TEEEEEEJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CIA is going to brief Congress <b>(keeping the details classified)</b> on the fact that it really was North Korea giving plutonium technology to Syria</p></blockquote>
<p>Keeping details classified is not a thing that congress does well at any rate just like paying attention. Am I silly to think congress&#8217;s judgement on anything where they would need to pay attention is worrisome?</p>
<p>TEEEEEEJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297874</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297874</guid>
		<description>After the ol&#039; Uranium for Plutonium switcheroo they pulled on the Carter/Clinton &quot;agreed framework,&quot; why we even bother speaking to the Norks is beyond me.

Our &quot;foreign policy&quot; toward Kim Jong Il should consist solely of engaging in activities to hasten his overthrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the ol&#8217; Uranium for Plutonium switcheroo they pulled on the Carter/Clinton &#8220;agreed framework,&#8221; why we even bother speaking to the Norks is beyond me.</p>
<p>Our &#8220;foreign policy&#8221; toward Kim Jong Il should consist solely of engaging in activities to hasten his overthrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meatpieandtatters</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-297872</link>
		<dc:creator>meatpieandtatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/23/cia-to-put-kibosh-on-faith-based-north-korea-policy/#comment-297872</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s always a motivation for saber rattling and proactive military maneuvers. Just ask the majority shareholders of GE, Lockheed and TRW and they&#039;ll wholeheartedly endorse taking the initiative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s always a motivation for saber rattling and proactive military maneuvers. Just ask the majority shareholders of GE, Lockheed and TRW and they&#8217;ll wholeheartedly endorse taking the initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
