McCain: Umm, okay, maybe Wright’s fair game after all (w/ video)

By see-dubya  •  April 27, 2008 07:17 PM

Well, never mind what the conservatives say, but if Obamessiah says Wright’s fair game, then have at him:

Sen. John McCain continues to ride a very thin line on the Jeremiah Wright controversy, reiterating today that while he will not make an issue of Barack Obama’s pastor, he will not be surprised if others do.

“I believe that Senator Obama does not share those views. But Senator Obama himself says it’s a legitimate political issue so I would imagine that many other people would share that view and it will be in the arena,” McCain said during a Miami-area media availability, alluding to comments Obama made during his Fox News Sunday interview today. The Illinois Democrat told FNS that “the fact that he is my former pastor I think makes it a legitimate political issue.”

McCain steps up and throws some pretty hard punches there, about Crackerquiddick, the gas tax holiday, terrorism, and capital gains. As for the Reverend, it looks like McCain’s actually bothered to listen to what Wright had to say–about Marines resembling the legionnaires who crucified Christ, and about there being no difference in the U.S. flag and Al Qaeda’s.

He still doesn’t think that NC-GOP ad should run, but says he’s not going to play the “referee” anymore.

McCain could have saved the party a lot of frustration had he just said this a couple days ago, and he wouldn’t have looked indecisive. He may hurt Obama with this, but he hasn’t done himself any favors.

_______________

{Post by See-Dubya}

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The DaleyGator » Blog Archive » Video- McCain OK with mentioning Rev. Wright now
  2. Nightly Ramble: Crucifixion,Zimbabwe,our place in the world,New low for BDS, and more | BitsBlog
  3. Michelle Malkin » SNOBwear makes headlines
  4. Is McCain Going Soft on Obama About Jeremiah Wright? « Firearms & Freedom

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #1
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:23 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    McCain is getting old and I’m not talking age-wise.

  2. #2
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:29 pm, Mimi1220 said:

    McCain better get tough and quick. The “nice guy” isn’t going to work against this Marxist. Take off the gloves and start fighting. This is our country we’re talking about!!!!!!!!

  3. #3
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:30 pm, Ragspierre said:

    McCain’s a racist…

    We can attack Obama via Ayers, but…

    Wright is off limits?

    The only distinction is their skin color.

    McCain is also too egotistical to prevent showing his own true colors.

    He has never met a conservative he likes as well as Teddy Kennedy.

  4. #4
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:33 pm, see-dubya said:

    Hey, follow the link. There’s no denying he gets some good licks in.

  5. #5
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:35 pm, havok said:

    I’m pretty certain McManInTheCan is such a weenie that he will vote for Obama-Morana (providing The Hillbilly is out).

  6. #6
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, PatriotRider said:

    Apparently the Viet Cong beat his manhood out of him. I hope he finds a pair before this gets serious.

  7. #7
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:45 pm, jimyai said:

    Democrat strategist Bob Beckle says North Carolina GOP who run the TV ad disapproved my McCain “A bunch of racist crackers”. I’m sure we can expect a lot more of this leftist race baiting anytime a conservative has a legitimate concern about policy or character.
    Fox News Channel Saturday 4.26.08 @ 4:46 PM
    In a Greg Kelly segment.

  8. #8
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:53 pm, zorro said:

    Speak of the Devil, Rev. Anthony just delivered a fiery intro to Jeremiah Wright at the Detroit NAACP get together.

    I think today may have delivered another reminder to the dense Senator McCain that he best not ignore or dis Republican conservatives. But you would think that looking at the anemic trickle of donations flowing in he would of figured that out a while ago.

  9. #9
    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:56 pm, zorro said:

    …flowing in he would of figured that out a while ago.

    Should read “would have figured…

  10. #10
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:03 pm, bit_boy said:
    RE: C-Wya #4

    I think I just made it a policy not to post to any C-Wya blogs. I need not it’s approval or permissions.

  11. #11
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:04 pm, dj said:

    I don’t get it. What evidence is there that Obama does NOT share Wright’s views? All evidence I have seen leads me to believe that he does. I would love someone to ask McCain, or anyone who thinks BO doesn’t agree with Wright, to support this assertion.

  12. #12
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:14 pm, katieanne said:

    What evidence is there that Obama does NOT share Wright’s views?

    Exactly. Why else would Obama continue to go to a church where that hate rhetoric is preached? I certainly don’t see Christ in any of those sermons.

  13. #13
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, love2rumba said:

    It’s Sunday in Marysville, Wa. and for once I’m having a good laugh courtesy John McCain…Johnny did the same thing with REv. Haggee of Texas…just took the money and his endorsement with zero passion…he didn’t even check that guy’s controversial stateemnts on Catholics. Really funny!

    (No I am not anti-catholic since half my relatives are catholic).

    I’ll bet there are a few RNC insiders who are rolling their eyes right now.

  14. #14
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:17 pm, love2rumba said:

    Maybe Senator McCain needs to attend sensitivity training classes (to help him with his bigotry against his own political base)!

    It’s a thought!

  15. #15
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:21 pm, gayle said:

    Anyone watching WRIGHT in Michigan?

    He’s mocking whites and others in my opinion. States that we are “different”, not deficit.

    Keeps repeating “a change is on the way…”.

    Is that a threat of some sort?

  16. #16
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:23 pm, magicarb said:

    I will vote a straight Republican ticket in November… except for President. That one I will leave unselected.

  17. #17
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:39 pm, dj said:

    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:23 pm, magicarb said:
    I will vote a straight Republican ticket in November… except for President. That one I will leave unselected.

    I understand this sentiment, as there is very little about McCain for conservatives to like…but as much as it pains me, I will have to hold my nose and vote for him, as I truly fear for this country should either of the Marxist dems get in. He is awful, but they are frighteningly atrocious. Having said that, I am flabbergasted that these three are thisclose to the Presidency. How on Earth did this happen? They are in no way the best this country has to offer…

  18. #18
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    Conservatives:

    All McCain is trying to do is swing some of the left to his side. That’s all. If he wins, I don’t think he’ll be some sissy liberal. He’s simply aware of his position in this close race and doesn’t want to blow it. Face it, the republican party is still fragile after Bush.

    Besides, let’s watch Hilary and Obama annihilate one another.

  19. #19
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:47 pm, JWS said:

    “I believe that Senator Obama does not share those views…”

    Why? Of course he shares “those views” Who would sit and listen to anything for TWENTY YEARS if they didn’t agree with it? One instance-sure. Two-absolutely. But after three separate sessions the whole “I don’t agree with that…” deteriorates rapidly.

    You want to fix the race thing in this country? The only way is for non-blacks to start calling em as they see em. BTW, has MM publicly called B. Hussein a racist? If she has and I missed it, please reference it for me.

  20. #20
    On April 27th, 2008 at 8:52 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I think McCan’t needs to do away with the kumbaya sessions.

  21. #21
    On April 27th, 2008 at 9:00 pm, WisCon said:

    It’s just a matter of time before McCain gives the finger to conservatives again. Just wait until he’s President. Can you say DHS chief Mel Martinez?

  22. #22
    On April 27th, 2008 at 9:01 pm, flenser said:

    All McCain is trying to do is swing some of the left to his side. That’s all. If he wins, I don’t think he’ll be some sissy liberal

    I take it you have not followed his career over the last ten years or so.

    The abbrieviated primary schedule killed the GOP. I can’t believe this turkey would have won if people knew more about him.

  23. #23
    On April 27th, 2008 at 9:30 pm, simcoe said:

    What a marshmallow!!

    I sure feel secure under the strong leadership qualities McCain is displaying.

    This guy reeeally makes me nervous. Trying much to hard to straddle the line. I’m afraid he’s going to do a Lieberman if he gets elected.

  24. #25
    On April 27th, 2008 at 9:37 pm, undrseige247 said:

    The old fighter pilot is going to have to surface. Just wait…

  25. #26
    On April 27th, 2008 at 9:58 pm, Bhishma said:

    Juan McCain depends on hispanIc votes. No matter how much Americans support McCain, he is going to stab Americans in the back, just as Bush stabbed his voters in the back and continues to do so.
    McCain, Obama and Hillary are just different shades of treason. The only saving grace of the presidential Race is Ron Paul. After that, Amwricans are better off not voting for these traitors. That way, atleast the self-respect is intact.

  26. #27
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:00 pm, Trollman said:

    Huh? So McCain is playing a game of Simon Obama says?

    “Obama says” it is a valid issue:
    McCain: It is a valid issue!

    “Obama says” it isn’t a valid issue:
    McCain: It isn’t a valid issue!

    It is a valid issue:
    McCain: It is a valid issue!
    Uh-unh, “Obama didn’t say” that…

    (weeps for country)

  27. #28
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:06 pm, love2rumba said:

    Fresh from Newsmax tonight:

    http://www.newsmax.com
    Headline Story RSS ARCHIVE

    Print Page | Forward Page | E-mail Us

    McCain’s War Words: Obama’s Relations with Wright Beyond Belief

    Sunday, April 27, 2008 7:48 PM

    Article Font Size

    Sen. John McCain came out swinging against the Rev. Jeremiah Wright on Sunday and suggested Sen. Barack Obama’s relationship with the controversial minister was “beyond belief.”

    Someone must have tapped him on the shoulder…eh?

  28. #29
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:07 pm, love2rumba said:

    Trollman you got it tonight…have a good one!

  29. #30
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:08 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:

    Why does any conservative think McCain will be better than a dem for 4 years? Have you seen what Arnold has done to CA? A lot worse than Gray Davis. So, I will NOT hold my nose to vote for MCShame because 1. he will likely win because many blue collar dems will never vote for BO and 2. I will not be responsible for the demise of conservatism or feel like biting myself every time McLAme does some idiotic move, like I have been doing with Arnold and Bush. I will not settle for the lesser of 2 evils any more.

  30. #31
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:11 pm, RealImmigrantChick said:

    Simcoe, I can almost guarantee McCAin will do an Arnold (formerly TErminator) once elected.

  31. #32
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:12 pm, nbarry said:

    IMHO, I feel that McCain is just being diplomatic about Obama, and that if Obama is given enough rope, he is going to hang himself.

  32. #33
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:16 pm, beenthere said:

    Wright = Obama. They are joined at the hip, so to speak. The only difference is that Obama uses his SmothJive to deliver the message; Wright just sticks it to the Man. If you want the message in English, listen to Wright.

    This is getting scary. Urban blacks will settle for nothing less than victory. If Obama is defeated in a landslide, it will be bad enough. A landslide defeat is, BTW, not terribly likely — this is not 1872 (the country has moved much further to the left) and Obama is more popular with democrats and able to command far greater resources than McGovern ever was.

    And if it is a close race, the outcome will be disputed and America will be in big trouble. It is possible that both parties will disintegrate as a result of this. It is also possible that when the dust settles, we will have effectively a one party state — like the mid-1930s. And under the same ruling party.

    I sincerely hope McCain and the Republican Effete are starting to get a glimmer of understanding regarding the racial nightmare that is being unleashed.

  33. #34
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:19 pm, nyc123me said:

    McCain’s little holier than thou plan didn’t work, and it angered the Republican base, so now he’s trying to backpedal.
    Too late.

  34. #35
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:24 pm, ajmontana said:

    Is that a threat of some sort?

    lol gayle, I don’t think he’s talking about the weather.
    Threats are in this week, al (not so) sharpton has made a few also.
    both turd burpers extraordinaire.

  35. #36
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:56 pm, wise_man said:

    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, PatriotRider said: Apparently the Viet Cong beat his manhood out of him.

    Yup. That and his teeth.

  36. #37
    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:57 pm, wise_man said:

    On April 27th, 2008 at 10:12 pm, nbarry said: IMHO, I feel that McCain is just being diplomatic about Obama, and that if Obama is given enough rope, he is going to hang himself.

    Oh – no – you – didnt.

  37. #38
    On April 27th, 2008 at 11:14 pm, Old Scout said:

    McCain is worried about the propaganda war, and has to trust his advisors about what statements of his the press is going to like or not like. After all, his advisors come from that process problem, and know how statements can be portrayed.

    He certainly didn’t look bad to the media propagandists when he spoke out about the anti-Wright ad. Why not leave the harsh statements to Clinton for now?

  38. #39
    On April 27th, 2008 at 11:20 pm, everett_mansfield said:

    McCain = senile.

  39. #40
    On April 27th, 2008 at 11:26 pm, everett_mansfield said:

    Obama = The Affirmative Action president = no qualifications required.

  40. #41
    On April 27th, 2008 at 11:39 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, PatriotRider said:
    Apparently the Viet Cong beat his manhood out of him. I hope he finds a pair before this gets serious.

    We can do without these kind of comments. Leave that to the Kos kids.

  41. #43
    On April 28th, 2008 at 12:15 am, KaosKlerik said:

    I think McCain is simply avoiding any issue that can be taken as him attacking Obama on race.

    He thinks he can avoid being branded a racist by the MSM if he doesn’t give them anything remotely close to it. What he doesn’t understand is that if they can’t distort the truth they’ll just make up something.

    Somebody ask McCain if he’s heard of Rathergate.

  42. #44
    On April 28th, 2008 at 12:26 am, Christian Soldier said:

    # 29

    Arnold was the last L.T.E. for whom my R. friends talked me into voting.

    This Froggy has jumped out of the slowly boiling water.

  43. #45
    On April 28th, 2008 at 1:42 am, CowboyBebop said:

    McCain is really getting to be annoying. God, why did he have to be our nominee?!

  44. #46
    On April 28th, 2008 at 2:12 am, Buckaroo said:

    # 43

    because several million people voted for him …

  45. #47
    On April 28th, 2008 at 2:44 am, stoptheinvasion said:

    several million morons.

  46. #48
    On April 28th, 2008 at 3:05 am, Buckaroo said:

    and those who voted for schmuck and rudy and rupaul are mensa members to you i suppose?

  47. #49
    On April 28th, 2008 at 6:02 am, Bhishma said:

    On April 28th, 2008 at 1:42 am, CowboyBebop said:
    McCain is really getting to be annoying. God, why did he have to be our nominee?!

    Because Republicans rejected a patriotic republican TOM TANCREDO, who cares for Ameerica more than all the front-runners put togather, and has plans in place to bring America out of “MORTAL DANGER” (the title of Tom’s book). Too bad Americans went with:
    - Juan McCain.
    - Mobarak “God-D**n-America” Obama.
    - Hillary “No-woman-is-illegal” Clinton.
    The elections are still on and Americans are gasping. Just wait till one of these traitors move intot he White House (after the present sell-out). Then again, remember, in a democracy, people get the Govt. they deserve.

  48. #50
    On April 28th, 2008 at 8:48 am, Wade said:

    McCain could have saved the party a lot of frustration had he just said this a couple days ago, and he wouldn’t have looked indecisive

    ~This turn around takes care of indecisive.

  49. #52
    On April 28th, 2008 at 10:06 am, wise_man said:

    On April 28th, 2008 at 1:42 am, CowboyBebop said: McCain is really getting to be annoying. God, why did he have to be our nominee?!

    I wish that McCain wasn’t voted above the candidate I wanted to win. I would love to see the nomination process changed. By the time it came to my state, it was already done.

    What gives me some pleasure right now is the fact that the democrats are fighting between Obama and Hillary. This division between them is a gift to us. No matter what happens, this battle of theirs is good, and I’m glad to see it last as long as it is.

    What gives me more displeasure, is the fact that some republicans are participating in this same situation of division – on us. McCain is going to be the nominee, and the same forces of division and infighting that is good when it happens to Obama and Hillary, is not good when it happens with McCain and everyone who hates McCain.

    If you like this, if you keep this up, this has no other purpose than to help elect a President Obama. Keep that in your mind when you keep bashing McCain.

    Sometimes the tipping point in elections in not from Republicans, not from Democrats, but the horrid section of America called ‘independents.’ these undecided voters can decide the outcome of the election.

  50. #53
    On April 28th, 2008 at 11:26 am, flenser said:

    and those who voted for schmuck and rudy and rupaul

    Did anyone end up actually voting for Rudy? That campaign went through tens of millions of dollars and ended up with as many delegates as Hunter.

  51. #54
    On April 28th, 2008 at 11:26 am, rightisright said:

    I’m in agreement with RealImmigrantChick, my back hasn’t healed yet from Bush’s betrayal.

    On April 28th, 2008 at 1:42 am, CowboyBebop said:McCain is really getting to be annoying. God, why did he have to be our nominee?

    Answer: RNC and state GOP primary rules, plain and simple. In short left wing dems and moderates gave us McAmanesty.
    Watch and see who the RNC is supporting and what their candidates are saying, in state elections, that will tell you a whole lot about what’s going on and where the party is headed.

    Nov. 4th ‘08 is going to be a sad day in America.

  52. #55
    On April 28th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    All of us are formed and molded by our associations. Obama specifically chose Wright’s church. He was not forced to attend and, frankly, he was a large donor. There is an important difference between associations from work where you can’t really pick and chose who you work with and for — and a church that you attend voluntarily. Obama shares many of Wright’s ideas, and to think otherwise requires suspension of reason.

  53. #56
    On April 28th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, California Conservative said:

    Ok, let me get this straight. McCain doesn’t like the Rev. Wright ad becuase he doesn’t think Obama shares the same views as Wright. He does however, like to attack Obama over the Bill Ayers connection. Does he believe that Obama shares the same views as Ayers? If so, why hasn’t McCain attacked Obama harder. I guess that’s what you get when you have to pick between 3 democrats. I would propose closed primaries next election cycle.

  54. #58
    On April 28th, 2008 at 2:06 pm, Buckaroo said:

    “If so, why hasn’t McCain attacked Obama harder”

    because it’s APRIL, and there remains a very real chance b.o. will not be the nominee …

    /strategy, an apparent lost art in america …

  55. #59
    On April 28th, 2008 at 2:40 pm, serfer62 said:

    MacNasty is probably the only GOP who can lose to Barry Hussein…

  56. #60
    On April 28th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    McCain continues to offend his conservative base with his attempts to make nice with the Democrats. All you have to do is take a hard look at Hillary vs Obama – as that is what is going to be coming down the track at you full force. If McCain had a brain and really listened to his advisors, he would shore up his base and stay away from trying to defend Obama against problems of Obama’s own making.

  57. #61
    On April 28th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, sbw999 said:

    It’s pretty bad when your political opponent has to tell you what is relevant in a presidential election. McCain’s holier than thou act is wearing thin. Seems that the only reason to vote for this RINO will be future supreme court appointees.

  58. #62
    On April 28th, 2008 at 8:06 pm, timinphoenix said:

    No. 6’s comment shows no class.

    People, especially conservativs who drag in McCain’s military record to make cheap shots about him, reveal more about them than they do him.

    I don’t like McCain. Actually I can’t stand him, but to use what he went through, while wearing this nation’s uniform, makes someone more close in spirit to some Code Pink Scum than anything else

  59. #63
    On April 28th, 2008 at 10:05 pm, PatriotRider said:

    On April 27th, 2008 at 11:39 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    We can do without these kind of comments. Leave that to the Kos kids.

    I was a lot kinder and much less profane that the Kos Kids will be. My point is that McCain better find that intestinal fortitude that got him through captivity pretty soon and back it up with some integrity or he will be toast.

  60. #64
    On April 29th, 2008 at 2:10 am, Ombre Rose said:

    I’m still in shock that the GOP leadership worked so bloody hard to find a way to prevent me from voting against the Dims, even another Clinton – and worked so hard to offend so many Conservatives, that a few million of them may even vote for a Dim, this year.

    Who knew, that after Gerald Ford, the GOP would NOT learn any lessons at all.

    THIRD WAVE!

    There is another THIRD WAVE – simultaneously to this one – and it just got started down in Florida.

    I think I see God moving on 2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

  61. #65
    On April 29th, 2008 at 2:14 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On April 27th, 2008 at 7:44 pm, PatriotRider said:
    Apparently the Viet Cong beat his manhood out of him. I hope he finds a pair before this gets serious.

    Oh, he has a pair – didn’t you notice the Gang of 14? His bravery in CROSSING THE AISLE to create anti-Constitutional bills with Thompson and Feingold, with Kennedy, with Edwards, with Lieberman, etc etc etc, et al – EVEN WITH ONLY HIMSELF as in the McCain Anti-Torture Bill?

    He’s got a pair – what I’m waiting for is some GOP Voters to notice what he does with them – WHO he is already fighting – and fighting with great gusto!

    WAKE UP!

  62. #66
    On April 29th, 2008 at 2:23 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On April 28th, 2008 at 10:05 pm, PatriotRider said:
    On April 27th, 2008 at 11:39 pm,

    I was a lot kinder and much less profane that the Kos Kids will be. My point is that McCain better find that intestinal fortitude that got him through captivity pretty soon and back it up with some integrity or he will be toast.

    Oh, he has been using that FORTITUDE – McCain Feingold Thompson, McCain Kennedy Shamnesty, rants against Abu Ghraib and GITMO and AMERICAN MILITARY TORTURE, i.e. WATERBOARDING, etc, et al…

    It is that issue of INTEGRITY, which I have NEVER seen him possess – much less APPLY…

    He is already more toasted than Robert Dole. But that just makes him all the “sweeter” to the DIMS.

    “The vote of your opponents is the most honorable mark by which the soundness of your conduct could be stamped. I claim the same honorable testimonial. There was but a single act of my whole administration of which [the opposing] party approved… And when I found they approved of it, I confess I began strongly to apprehend I had done wrong, and to exclaim with the Psalmist, ‘Lord, what have I done that the wicked should praise me?’” –Thomas Jefferson to Elbridge Gerry, 1812. ME 13:162

    2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

  63. #67
    On April 29th, 2008 at 2:32 am, Ombre Rose said:

    On April 28th, 2008 at 7:09 pm, sbw999 said:
    It’s pretty bad when your political opponent has to tell you what is relevant in a presidential election. McCain’s holier than thou act is wearing thin. Seems that the only reason to vote for this RINO will be future supreme court appointees.

    For the SUPREME COURT???

    You think that appointees who will guarantee him they’ll rule HIS PORTFOLIO the most brilliant and Constitutional body of work that ever existed is worth voting for??? Appointees who will leave Roe V Wade alone, who will let McCain Feingold Thompson stand, who will VALIDATE McCain Kennedy if it ever(sic) gets past a Dim Congress on McCain’s watch???

    THAT is worth holding your nose to vote for HIM? And GITMO CIVILIAN TRIALS ON AMERICAN SOIL that pass muster with the ACLU???? APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT APPOINTEES OF PUNK McNASTY???????

    I think you have not possibly thought this through.

    McCain is liable to put Johnny Sutton and Fred Thompson on the Court – the Fred Thompson who claims PERJURY BEFORE A WORLD AUDIENCE is NOT an impeachable offense – who as a Watergate Prosecutor was chosen to head the committee to investigate the Clinton CHINESE GOVT DONATIONS to their campaign funds AND SUCCESSFULLY DIVERTED THE COMMITTEE to a skewering of GOP Politicians for minor infractions.

    Sorry, pardon me while I go barf for a while.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Obama, Pelosi on a money-grubbing mission

March 17, 2010 12:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

33 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

WaPo sheds tears over Desiree Rogers

March 4, 2010 04:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 1 Trackback

DLTDHYOTWO: Desiree Rogers steps down, but not out

February 26, 2010 02:23 PM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Butterfly.

David Paterson’s ouster: Patrick Gaspard’s revenge

February 26, 2010 10:54 AM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Persuasion of power.

Re-branding the government: Obama, TMP, and logo-mania

February 24, 2010 10:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

A failure of GOP imagination

February 24, 2010 09:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

146 Comments | 8 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, John McCain



Mudville Gazette

» Protests in DC
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook