<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The seduction of Hannah Montana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Disney&#8217;s New Jailbait Princess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-744105</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; Disney&#8217;s New Jailbait Princess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-744105</guid>
		<description>[...] You can read the rest of that, which includes a video clip of the tango scene described. And I should point out that the photo that illustrates this article was cropped from a larger image in which Gomez appears to be imitating the Vanity Fair photo of Miley Cyrus that enraged The Boss. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read the rest of that, which includes a video clip of the tango scene described. And I should point out that the photo that illustrates this article was cropped from a larger image in which Gomez appears to be imitating the Vanity Fair photo of Miley Cyrus that enraged The Boss. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sega&#8217;s new items for the Wii &#124; 1800blogger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-638576</link>
		<dc:creator>Sega&#8217;s new items for the Wii &#124; 1800blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-638576</guid>
		<description>[...] Miley Cyrus&#8217;s TV role above, because those Disney productions are awful. On a related note, check out this item from Michelle Malkin, which could tell why Hannah Montana isn&#8217;t worth it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miley Cyrus&#8217;s TV role above, because those Disney productions are awful. On a related note, check out this item from Michelle Malkin, which could tell why Hannah Montana isn&#8217;t worth it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yashmak</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-350021</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-350021</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, I pose to the forum: are those responsible for the picture nihilistic-evil or pedophile-evil?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Neither.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder if the photographer, editor, &amp; everyone else in the food chain that put this picture out reveled more in the destruction of wholesomeness and purity that they accomplished, or are they straight up pedophiles? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Destruction of wholesomeness/purity?  She shows more skin at public appeareances. Relax.  Can you BE any more melodramatic?  If they were pedophiles, they&#039;d be furtively watching the 15 yr olds in two-piece bathing suits at the public pool in ANY TOWN ACROSS THE ENTIRE NATION.

Maybe I&#039;ll try melodrama and sarcasm:
Poor little celebrity posed for a picture showing nothing but her back.  How could she EVER have imagined a picture of her back would get published?  How utterly humiliating!

For pete&#039;s sake people the reclining poses in the video are far more &quot;titillating&quot; than the picture of her that people are taking issue with.  They&#039;re far more sexually provocative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, I pose to the forum: are those responsible for the picture nihilistic-evil or pedophile-evil?</p></blockquote>
<p>Neither.  </p>
<blockquote><p>I wonder if the photographer, editor, &amp; everyone else in the food chain that put this picture out reveled more in the destruction of wholesomeness and purity that they accomplished, or are they straight up pedophiles? </p></blockquote>
<p>Destruction of wholesomeness/purity?  She shows more skin at public appeareances. Relax.  Can you BE any more melodramatic?  If they were pedophiles, they&#8217;d be furtively watching the 15 yr olds in two-piece bathing suits at the public pool in ANY TOWN ACROSS THE ENTIRE NATION.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll try melodrama and sarcasm:<br />
Poor little celebrity posed for a picture showing nothing but her back.  How could she EVER have imagined a picture of her back would get published?  How utterly humiliating!</p>
<p>For pete&#8217;s sake people the reclining poses in the video are far more &#8220;titillating&#8221; than the picture of her that people are taking issue with.  They&#8217;re far more sexually provocative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webelf Report Blogroll &#171; The WebElf Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-326513</link>
		<dc:creator>Webelf Report Blogroll &#171; The WebElf Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-326513</guid>
		<description>[...] THE SEDUCTION of Hannah Montana&#8211; dirty old woman Annie Leibowitz is a high-end seducer, getting a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THE SEDUCTION of Hannah Montana&#8211; dirty old woman Annie Leibowitz is a high-end seducer, getting a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Beyonce&#8217;s new brand of pedophilia chic</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-320875</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Beyonce&#8217;s new brand of pedophilia chic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-320875</guid>
		<description>[...] Miley Cyrus—wearing nothing but ruby-stained lips and a bedsheet—in Vanity Fair magazine was disturbing, you ain&#8217;t seen nothing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miley Cyrus—wearing nothing but ruby-stained lips and a bedsheet—in Vanity Fair magazine was disturbing, you ain&#8217;t seen nothing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; R.I.P. Eddy Arnold</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-317213</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; R.I.P. Eddy Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-317213</guid>
		<description>[...] and he never posed nude for a magazine cover (nor let his fifteen-year-old daughter do so like Billy B. Badd did.) He just sang, and sang well, in a great warm baritone that you&#8217;ll probably like even if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and he never posed nude for a magazine cover (nor let his fifteen-year-old daughter do so like Billy B. Badd did.) He just sang, and sang well, in a great warm baritone that you&#8217;ll probably like even if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miley Cyrus&#8217; Big Debacle &#187; OpinionBug.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-311116</link>
		<dc:creator>Miley Cyrus&#8217; Big Debacle &#187; OpinionBug.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-311116</guid>
		<description>[...] her fan-base isn&#8217;t the least bit troubled about her revealing Vanity Fair photo that Michelle Malkin said made her look like she had just &#8220;awoken after a one-night [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] her fan-base isn&#8217;t the least bit troubled about her revealing Vanity Fair photo that Michelle Malkin said made her look like she had just &#8220;awoken after a one-night [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin: Slow down! &#171; The Thinker</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-308721</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin: Slow down! &#171; The Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-308721</guid>
		<description>[...] was over at Michelle&#8217;s site (Michelle Malkin.com) as I do regularly and happened upon that one proverbial article that haunts us like crazy. I will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was over at Michelle&#8217;s site (Michelle Malkin.com) as I do regularly and happened upon that one proverbial article that haunts us like crazy. I will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Crittenden &#187; From the Mouths of Babes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-308704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules Crittenden &#187; From the Mouths of Babes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-308704</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin with related thoughts, and more re Leibowitz&#8217;s body of body work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin with related thoughts, and more re Leibowitz&#8217;s body of body work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sclawstudent</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-308008</link>
		<dc:creator>sclawstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-308008</guid>
		<description>As pointed out above, the picture isn&#039;t attractive in any aesthetic sense; nor is it sexually attractive to a normal person.  So, I pose to the forum: are those responsible for the picture nihilistic-evil or pedophile-evil?
I wonder if the photographer, editor, &amp; everyone else in the food chain that put this picture out reveled more in the destruction of wholesomeness and purity that they accomplished, or are they straight up pedophiles?  Were they simply motivated by their life-hating degenerate values and seeking to destroy good, or were they motivated by some sick, pseudo-sexual perversion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As pointed out above, the picture isn&#8217;t attractive in any aesthetic sense; nor is it sexually attractive to a normal person.  So, I pose to the forum: are those responsible for the picture nihilistic-evil or pedophile-evil?<br />
I wonder if the photographer, editor, &amp; everyone else in the food chain that put this picture out reveled more in the destruction of wholesomeness and purity that they accomplished, or are they straight up pedophiles?  Were they simply motivated by their life-hating degenerate values and seeking to destroy good, or were they motivated by some sick, pseudo-sexual perversion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valleygreaser</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-307078</link>
		<dc:creator>valleygreaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-307078</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;will never you understand&lt;/blockquote&gt;

supposed to be &quot;will never understand&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>will never you understand</p></blockquote>
<p>supposed to be &#8220;will never understand&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arvesonc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-307075</link>
		<dc:creator>arvesonc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-307075</guid>
		<description>The failure has been over the last several years, where Miss Cyrus&#039; parents have failed to teach her that when &lt;strong&gt;anyone&lt;/strong&gt; asks you to remove your clothing, the answer is a firm, &quot;No!&quot;

Only appropriate medical personnel and her husband has the right to hear any other answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The failure has been over the last several years, where Miss Cyrus&#8217; parents have failed to teach her that when <strong>anyone</strong> asks you to remove your clothing, the answer is a firm, &#8220;No!&#8221;</p>
<p>Only appropriate medical personnel and her husband has the right to hear any other answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valleygreaser</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-307019</link>
		<dc:creator>valleygreaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-307019</guid>
		<description>Miley (with help from her dad) has sent Vanity Fair a plea not to publish her photo shoot. I have managed to obtain a copy. It goes like this ...


&lt;em&gt;Don&#039;t show my back
My naked, naked back
I just don&#039;t think you understand

That if you show my back
My naked, naked back
It might cause me to lose a fan

Now you can show my toes
Show me in my hose
Show me in my jammies if you can

But if you show my back
My naked, naked back
It&#039;s something the law just oughta ban

Don&#039;t show my back
My naked, naked back
The fans will never you understand

And if you show my back
My naked, naked back
It might be a flash in the pan&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miley (with help from her dad) has sent Vanity Fair a plea not to publish her photo shoot. I have managed to obtain a copy. It goes like this &#8230;</p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t show my back<br />
My naked, naked back<br />
I just don&#8217;t think you understand</p>
<p>That if you show my back<br />
My naked, naked back<br />
It might cause me to lose a fan</p>
<p>Now you can show my toes<br />
Show me in my hose<br />
Show me in my jammies if you can</p>
<p>But if you show my back<br />
My naked, naked back<br />
It&#8217;s something the law just oughta ban</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t show my back<br />
My naked, naked back<br />
The fans will never you understand</p>
<p>And if you show my back<br />
My naked, naked back<br />
It might be a flash in the pan</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mookie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-306984</link>
		<dc:creator>Mookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-306984</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On April 30th, 2008 at 6:39 pm, fourstringfuror said:

valleygreaser -

You should definitely not give Mookie any more attention than necessary. He thrives on negativity (several others do, too, sadly) and loves to argue, in my limited experience.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;She&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;strong&gt;She&lt;/strong&gt; thrives on negativity. And if thinking that Miley Cyrus and her parents aren&#039;t innocent victims in this debacle means I thrive on negativity, I have no problem with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On April 30th, 2008 at 6:39 pm, fourstringfuror said:</p>
<p>valleygreaser -</p>
<p>You should definitely not give Mookie any more attention than necessary. He thrives on negativity (several others do, too, sadly) and loves to argue, in my limited experience.
</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>She</strong>. <strong>She</strong> thrives on negativity. And if thinking that Miley Cyrus and her parents aren&#8217;t innocent victims in this debacle means I thrive on negativity, I have no problem with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publiuswarmac9999</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/comment-page-3/#comment-306967</link>
		<dc:creator>publiuswarmac9999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/2008/04/29/the-seduction-of-hannah-montana/#comment-306967</guid>
		<description>Rusty:  Contrary to your protestations, my facts were not torn apart.  They were demeaned and derided as some type of Christian plot, but they were never refuted.  Also, a number of objective individuals actually did look at the facts and sources - and came to the conclusion that there was some merit in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty:  Contrary to your protestations, my facts were not torn apart.  They were demeaned and derided as some type of Christian plot, but they were never refuted.  Also, a number of objective individuals actually did look at the facts and sources &#8211; and came to the conclusion that there was some merit in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
