May Day, May Day: All-purpose, left-wing grievance day; West Coast port shutdowns expected; in-your-face illegal aliens in Chicago; 29 ports down; Los Angeles fizzle

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 1, 2008 07:36 AM

1asoy.jpg 1:40pm Eastern. The illegal alien march in Chicago is underway. His t-shirt says: “I’m illegal. So what?” (Full photo at the Chicago Tribune site.) Live video coverage here.

Scroll down for updates…

Illegal immigration activists and anti-war activists will lead the parades today, but May Day attracts all grievance-mongers.

Here’s another all-purpose, everything-but-the-kitchen-sink “list of demands” (I feel like I’m at Oberlin again) from the “National Immigrant Solidarity Network:”

On May Day 2008, National Immigrant Solidarity Network is calling for a multi-ethnic, decentralized, multi-topic and multi-tactic national day of mobilization to support immigrant workers rights.

1. No to anti-immigrant legislation, and the criminalization of the immigrant communities.
2. No to militarization of the border.
3. No to the immigrant detention and deportation.
4. No to the guest worker program.
5. No to employer sanction and “no match” letters.
6. Yes to a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
7. Yes to speedy family reunification.
8. Yes to civil rights and humane immigration law.
9. Yes to labor rights and living wages for all workers.
10. Yes to the education and LGBT immigrant legislation.

We acknowledges that there’ll be multiple call to actions from across the country to organize May Day 2008, and each coalition will present their sets of demands. We should respects each other organizing and encourage and supports everyone’s issues:

1) Multi-ethnic, Decentralized and Multi-topic mobilization: while everyone will pledge to support immigrant workers rights at May Day 2007, local groups can choose to includes any other topics for their mobilizations: civil rights, anti-war, Katrina, labor rights, health care…., etc.

2) Decentralized Multi-Tactic May Day organizing: We will encourage everyone to organize their actions at May Day, but will let local groups to decide what they want to do at the day: march, boycott, strike, lunch action, vigil, community event, conference or congressional lobby day, etc.Understanding the connections between our individual conditions of life and the lives of people everywhere in the word allows us to come together and organize across all borders. WE NEED to link the connections between: wars in Africa, south America, Asia, Iraq, Palestine & Korea with sweatshops in Asia as well as in Los Angeles, New York; international arm sales and WTO, FTAA, NAFTA & CAFTA with AIDS, hunger, child labors and child solider; multinational corporations and economic exploitation with racism and poverty at home–then we can win the struggle.Let’s all come together, on May Day 2008, to build a new immigrant rights and civil rights movements!

Their calendar includes the “Festival of Tolerance and Unity” in Aurora, CO; a nationwide call to walk out of school to protest standardized testing; and a protest by longshoremen in San Francisco.

Good luck to the law enforcement officers across the country–especially in L.A.–who will have to contend with the attention-craving, law-ignoring ruffians and thugs turning out today for the annual p.c. powwow. They’ll need it.

***

Update 9:30am Eastern (hat tip – reader William Amos): I mentioned the longshoremen’s protest in the SF Bay Area. Looks like a shutdown of ports is expected all along the West Coast. Via KING5 TV in Seattle:

May Day rallies are expected to draw thousands of protestors Thursday, and on the Seattle waterfront, longshoremen may join in.

KING 5 got late word Wednesday that longshoremen up and down the West Coast may not show up for work Thursday to protest the Iraq War.

So far, the local longshoremen’s union has declined to comment about a possible walkout. In fact, a union arbitrator has warned them that such a walkout violates union contract and is illegal, but Thursday is May Day when workers traditionally celebrate the labor movement.

Three separate marches are scheduled for Thursday which could cause major traffic delays – two during the noon hour, and the biggest one is expected to shut down traffic in downtown Seattle for almost 2 hours during the evening commute.

Starting at 4 p.m., it runs from Judkins Park on the north side of I-90 and makes its way down 4th Avenue to the Seattle Center, ending at about 6:30 p.m. Metro warned bus riders to prepare for a major disruption.

An arbitrator has ordered the union that represents dockworkers at West Coast ports to tell members they must report to work on Thursday and not take the day off to protest U.S. military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. A wide enough walkout could cause a slowdown at the West Coast ports – the nation’s major gateway for cargo from the Far East.

Arbitrator John Kagel issued his decision Wednesday after holding a hearing by phone with the employers’ group, the Pacific Maritime Association, and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, according to a document outlining the ruling. The union previously asked employers to clear the way for members to skip out on the day shift to protest the war, but employers refused the request and were backed by the arbitrator last week. Despite that decision, word continued to spread on the Internet of a May 1 walkout by longshore workers and details of protests, including a march in San Francisco.

****
Update 8:30 Pacific, by See-Dubya: More about that port shutdown…the longshoremen’s union leadership was getting cold feet about shutting down the ports. ILWU officers weren’t going to bless work stoppage to protest the war:

ILWU executives had initially given their blessing to an eight-hour work stoppage during the busy day shift, which was suggested two months ago during a union caucus in San Francisco….

The union withdrew its support shortly after the Pacific Maritime Association denied the union’s request for the walkout. An arbitrator ruled last week that the union had to inform its members about the change in plans.

As a result, any work stoppage held Thursday will be initiated by the union’s rank-and-file members, not by union executives, according to Merrilees.

“In light of those developments, we hope that May 1 will come and go without disruption,” said Steve Getzug, a spokesman for the PMA, which represents the West Coast’s shippers.

Hey, don’t blame us, the union executives say. Blame… Cynthia McKinney!

***

Update 1:50pm Eastern. Things are heating up in Chicago. The Trib estimates about 2,000 have shown up to demand non-enforcement of our immigration laws. Many students are playing hookie to attend:

“We want to change the immigration laws. We have to support our parents,” he added. Marlene Rivera, 15, a Kelly High School freshman, boarded buses along with about 200 other students at the school.

She and others from a school club called Latinos United spent the last month preparing for the march. Standing with three friends who held Mexican flags, she said they wanted elected officials as well as the presidential candidates to know that youth supports changing immigration law.

“We want to help out and let them know that it’s just not the grown-ups, but young people too,” she said.

Elizabeth Quiroz, 14, another Kelly freshman, said many of her classmates have been born in the U.S. to undocumented parents and live with the fear their parents may be deported at any time.

“If parents get sent back to Mexico, then the kids are going to be on their own,” she said.

***

Update, 2:40PM Eastern–See-Dubya: Gerard Vanderleun’s observations and reflections on the May Day celebrations in Seattle are a must read: The Banality of Sedition.

Update 4:20pm Eastern. All 29 West Coast ports are down.

Update 6:04pm Eastern. Protest Shooter has a photo essay of SF’s circus. This one says it all:

1aflag002.jpg

Update 7:50pm Eastern. Freedom Folks file their report from Chicago.

Update 8:34pm Eastern. Slapstick Politics reports on the Denver rally.

Update 9:00pm Eastern. Los Angeles’s Grand March fizzles.

Posted in: Immigration

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Right Voices » Blog Archive » Happy May Day: Illegal Aliens imposed more than $26.3 billion in costs paid only $16 billion in taxes, creating a net fiscal deficit of almost $10.4 billion, or $2,700 per illegal household
  2. Noblesse Oblige » Rites of Spring
  3. Red_State_Blue
  4. The Conservative Pulse: Clinton v. O’Reilly, Illegal Immigration Whackos, The Theology of Barack Obama at The Liberty Preservation Alliance
  5. May Day «
  6. Three cheers for communism! | Cold Fury
  7. What I’m Reading Instead Of Working » Pursuing Holiness
  8. Happy May Day! « Nice Deb
  9. Comic Relief | Comments from Left Field
  10. B I R D
  11. May Day's Left Wing Agenda... and LOYALTY Day? Gimme a Break! | The TIW Blog
  12. Maritime Monday 109 | gCaptain.com
  13. Chicago May Day March: A Pictorial » Freedom Folks

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #307690
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:36 am, William Teach said:

    Do any of these leftards actually work? Do they have jobs to go to?

  2. #307693
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:37 am, xler8bmw said:

    #94 lgm is partially correct. Most ME continue to live like 4th century tribes and allow religion to rule.

  3. #307698
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:40 am, orlandocajun said:

    The Spanish speaking culture in America will continue to be rich and vibrant

    Don’t they have to start being rich and vibrant before they can continue? Just wondering…

  4. #307701
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:42 am, md1964 said:

    Don’t you love (Sarcasm) when Geraldo and the other losers who dislike Americans, tells us…that we are “Anti-Immigrant or Anti-Latino” if you are against enforcing our Immigration Laws..

    A good Response Michelle or anyone one else who gets to debate them is…

    “To make that statement, is tant amount to saying…. You are Anti-Pharmacist if you are against crack or Meth Dealers/smugglers”. (Which coincidently have a large segment of people fallinging into both the illegal alien and drug smuggling categories).

  5. #307704
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:45 am, NHMagenta said:

    #55, Great List!

    TOEFL (Test of English as Foreign Language) with the spoken module should be required for anyone who wishes to stay long-term in the USA.

    However as for amnesty I say NO!

    Let any illegal alien who wants to live, study and work in the USA go home , go to the US Consulate or Embassy and apply for a visa like everyone else.

    Those who can pass a GED and TOEFL get priority.

    Those who have criminal records in the USA (including DUI and major motor vehicle offenses),
    illiterates,
    those who are positive for HIV, hepatitis, TB , illegal drugs or heavy alcohol abuse, diabetics, or other major unhealthiness should never be eligible for any sort of entry into the USA.

    As far as military goes, we’d be better off allowing only natural born citizens who have no other loyalties except to the United States into our armed forces.

    The only amnesty I’d want to see is for those who employed illegals conditioned on them paying all back taxes for any illegals they had off the books.

  6. #307705
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:46 am, shooter said:

    “…local groups can choose to includes any other topics for their mobilizations:”

    seems as if one of the illiterate illegals wrote the piece as well. (just put an ’s’ on the end of everything for plurals.)

  7. #307714
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:53 am, RobM1981 said:

    I’m all for “family reunification.”

    The faster we can send the illegals back to where they came, the faster they can reunite with their families…

  8. #307720
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:54 am, psionickender said:

    I find it funny that these people come out to protest when the weather gets nice. Now, if they protested during horrible weather… that would be something!

  9. #307726
    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:57 am, RTater said:

    In Denver, we will find out today. It is snowing and cold. Although, sombreros are as good at keeping snow off the head as they are with sun. Ay, carumba!

  10. #307729
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:01 pm, moonsbreath said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 9:45 am, terristeelmagnolia said:
    moonsbreath,
    we have a couple in our neighborhood…

    6 to 10 cars parked out front at any given time…
    about 10 to 15 men constantly going in and out…
    they go thru the back gate…

    the yard looks like crap…
    it is just sickening…

    We had something similar to that two years ago, a house almost across the street from ours. We started seeing about 4 vans at this house. On the weekends, there were several cars parked all along the street. Only men going inside. Right around Christmas, the police raided the home. The house was an illegal prostitution ring. I was shocked to learn there were women at that house as I never saw any. Turns out, the women were brought up from Mexico in those vans and were being held in the converted garage.

    My neighborhood is not a slum area either; however, it is slowly turning into one.

    The major problem in our subdivision is that many years ago, we let the Homeowner’s Assoc. lapse and now there’s no way anyone is going to be interested in reviving it.

  11. #307733
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:03 pm, TRM said:

    A bunch of illiterate immigrant invaders being used by leftist commies…

    I think its sad that the cops are in LA trying to do a job while being provoked and monitored by every leftist lawyer in the country… I’d love to walk the “observer” crowd quietly with a cattle prod…. :)

  12. #307734
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:03 pm, allrsn said:

    Ever more reason to get their a$$’$ out of here.

    Can you imainge 20 million of us going to mexico and making these damands of them while threatning to take 10% of their nation by sheer numbers????

    Dm you McCain!

  13. #307743
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, Regulus said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 8:10 am, jfish said:

    May Day is simply picked as the delivery vehicle due to its roots in the pagan British Isles, where it was a major Druidic holiday. For whatever reason, much of the moonbattery of the US has latched onto May Day as some sort of magic Celtic connection to … whatever. Very much akin to the way the New Age latched on to the Far Eastern quasi-Buddhist stuff.

    I’d agree with the “ritual” concept, although my comparison isn’t so much with Celts and Druids as much as with the original Star Trek episode, “The Return of the Archons” – i.e., one day every year, for no apparent reason, the locals go ape in an orgy of violence and destruction known as the “Festival.”

    In fact, if I heard any of the May Day “protesters” shouting, “Festival! Festival!!” while blocking gates and provoking the police, it wouldn’t surprise me at all.

  14. #307745
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, lgm said:

    To quote Arlo Guthrie:

    I love Fidel Castro and his beard.

  15. #307746
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:07 pm, moonsbreath said:

    The Spanish speaking culture in America will continue to be rich and vibrant.

    I’d be rich too if I had three other families move into my 1,500 sq. ft. home. Vibrant too, counting all my money I would save.

  16. #307752
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:09 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    What do we have to do to get a national referendum put on the ballot?

    It only needs to address 2 issues.

    1. Only children born to those legally in the U.S. will be considered citizens.

    2. Employers need to verify that the name and SSN match every new employee. Any “no match” situations are punishable by jail time.

    What does it take for the will of the people to be heard?

  17. #307757
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:11 pm, Cosmo said:

    When will these idiots finally come clean and CLEARLY delineate between the “immigrant” and “illegal immigrant” communities?

    I’m all for decriminalizing immigrant communities. However I’m all for criminalizing ILLEGAL immigrant communities.

    That’s the problem, chief. It’s ILLEGAL. Therefore, by definition, CRIMINAL.

    Good grief.

  18. #307764
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:17 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 8:37 am, tre said:
    #7 30 Pieces of Silver

    Here in Oklahoma we passed a law punishing any employer who knowingly hires illegals. We also passed a law making English the offical language of the state.
    There sure isn’t much support for them here.

    I love it. As soon as the GOP gets some folks in office in TEXAS who agree with the MAJORITY OF TEXANS, we’ll do the same!

    Some of the GOP Pols we have now seem to think when Texas tossed the DIM PARTY OUT ON THEIR EAR, that that meant we wanted the GOP to start acting like DIMS.

    And 30 pcs of silver, you were just as right the last two times. I guess it is nicer to say it like Bugs Bunny, they are MAROONS!

    But it means the same thing. I look forward to the day when they cannot touch us anymore, but reality that THEY CREATED hits them in the face like a lead balloon.

    I’m beginning to think that day is approaching much faster than anyone imagines.

  19. #307766
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:18 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:09 pm, Concerned Citizen said:
    “1. Only children born to those legally in the U.S. will be considered citizens.”

    I would modify that to say, only children born to at least 1 American citizen parent is a citizen of the US. Many a mexican mom walks across the border, legally, when it is time to deliver so the the little American is eligible for welfare. It does not stop there. My wife and I (she is from Europe) met a lady from Albania on flight to Europe back in the 90’s. She gleefully told us how she got a visitor’s visa to come to the US in the 8th month of her pregnancy so the baby would be an American citizen. Talk about abuse. Why she did it then returned is beyond me (we did not ask). I suspect to collect welfare or maybe to sponsor her or someone else. Sponsorhip is worth a lot of $. In any case, it was blatant abuse of our systems.

  20. #307774
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Bluejester said:

    :sigh: Stuff like this just depresses me at times, if its not irking me as well such as google’s use of maracas on their site today. Let’s see how they do on Memorial Day, shall we?

  21. #307782
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:25 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:03 pm, allrsn said:
    Ever more reason to get their a$$’$ out of here.

    Can you imainge 20 million of us going to mexico and making these damands of them while threatning to take 10% of their nation by sheer numbers????

    Dm you McCain!

    That is an EXECUTABLE OFFENSE in Mexico!

    DOUBLE D##N you, McNasty!

    Do we see the doors of YOUR HOME ripped off and some street gang given the RED CARPET TREATMENT there in your living room, and kitchen, and refrigerator, etc, et al?????

    I sure do not THINK SO, McJack A$$!!!

    When YOU LEGALLY ADOPT a STREET GANG and give them EQUAL SHARES as heirs to your estate with your NATURAL CHILDREN, – OOPS, THAT might be an INCREASE of the NATURAL CHILDREN’S SHARE — THEN talk to us.

    MAYBE.

  22. #307783
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:27 pm, Jim M. said:

    The Guy From Boston makes a good, if not somewhat colorful, point:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecq-A0CrP0o&feature=related

    If you are sensitive to colorful, yet eloquent, language, you may want to pass on opening the link. The point here is that Mexico’s own laws are highly discriminatory to those not born in that country.

  23. #307791
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:33 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Hear hear to ACHefty in #4!

    Couldn’t have said it better myself!

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  24. #307792
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:33 pm, sambo said:

    The Spanish speaking culture in America will continue to be rich and vibrant

    The rich and vibrant culture in America will continue to be Spanish English speaking.

  25. #307795
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:35 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Why should anyone listen to your DEMANDs and grievances?

    Indeed. It’s not like anyone’s listening to OUR grievances vis a vis the expansion of illegal government contrary to the Constitution, and that’s a bigger problem than these illegal aliens will ever be!

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  26. #307797
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:37 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Where are the immigration enforcement crowds though? Are there counter protests? Where is our law enforcement, when we have a gathering where there is certain to be people who are criminals in the mix?

    INS/ICE could have a field day!

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  27. #307808
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:41 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    LGM – what other non-English languages are you talking about? The only other one I hear is Spanish. The only choice I am given other than English, is Spanish. I have never been asked to press 3 for French, or 4 for Italian, or 5 for German. Why should my chocies be limited?

    We shouldn’t have to press ANYTHING for ANYTHING. If you want to speak another language in this country, call someone you know who speaks it. We do business here in English, period (or so it oughta be).

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  28. #307809
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:41 pm, hatelibs said:

    I have a simple suggestion for all the open borders pro-criminal illegal aliens jackasses…..we not get the right to remove the locks on the doors to your homes, cars, or anything else you have a lock or form of protection for.

    That’s what you want this sovereign nation to do so what’s the problem? I cannot comprehend the open border, pro criminal (that IS WHAT THEY ARE!!!)arguments in any way. It is INSANE!

  29. #307811
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:42 pm, rplatt said:

    Let’s not glorify this garbage. These people are not immigrants, they’re illegal parasites that want free stuff from the Democrats and other liberals in return for political support and votes (legal or illegal).

  30. #307813
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:43 pm, hatelibs said:

    Correction:

    we now get the right to remove the locks on the doors to your homes, cars, or anything else you have a lock or form of protection for.

  31. #307814
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:43 pm, granite said:

    #115 On May 1st, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Bluejester said:

    :sigh: Stuff like this just depresses me at times, if its not irking me as well such as google’s use of maracas on their site today.

    So that’s what they are.
    They were there yesterday, too.

  32. #307815
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:44 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    The last two are not.

    A non-answer for a comment with no truth connected to it is the perfect answer.

    Deal with it.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  33. #307819
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:45 pm, dakine said:

    Sorry lgm…can’t defend you on this one. You are, in fact, acting like a troll. Abstractmind is right on point.

    Unfortunately, I think the cow is way out of the barn on the immigration issue. It seems to me that the demographics (birth rates, population patterns, etc.) underlying the various issues at hand have passed the tipping point. I think we’re mostly whistling past the graveyard on this one.

  34. #307824
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:51 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:43 pm, granite said:
    #115 On May 1st, 2008 at 12:20 pm, Bluejester said:

    :sigh: Stuff like this just depresses me at times, if its not irking me as well such as google’s use of maracas on their site today.
    So that’s what they are.
    They were there yesterday, too.

    I think they’re just trying to hawk another one of their products. The following line has also been on the main page for the last two days.

    What happens when great art mixes with your homepage? iGoogle Artist Themes

  35. #307826
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:51 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Off topic, but rightwingrocker you do realize that you can link your webpage to your name when you post by going into your profile and putting that link into the “webpage” section?

    Having it as a sig line after every post is a bit much.

  36. #307831
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:54 pm, Ombre Rose said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 11:02 am, vickisoup said:
    Now, see, I read lgm #16, in response to 30pcs #9, differently. Here’s what lgm writes to 30pcs:

    The first two are arguments. The last two are not [quoting]:

    You’re an idiot.

    You’re an imbecile. There is no other way to say it.
    What I thought he was saying is that there is no arguing those last two points, which made me pleased that lgm and I actually agree on something!

    Funny, I took what 30 pcs was saying was that the counter-arguments for the last two “points” is long, tedious, yet so intrinsically vital to the freedoms of a democratic republic, that someone who is an adult, yet “NEEDS” these things pointed out to them, isn’t going to “GET IT”, any way, and is suicidally deficient in what it takes to live in a self-sustaining community environment as anything other than a parasite with no contributions to make to the general health of the community, upon which he requires feeding himself to be able to survive. Yet shows tendencies to try to take down as huge a crowd of innocent bystanders to his untimely demise as he possibly can.

    Put the person in a more primitive and basic community in which he has to carry his own weight and actually, like, accept responsibility for himself and the consequences he creates with his imbicilic conduct, and for CONTRIBUTING, and also to accept very basic levels of responsibility for any detrimental conduct that harms or WOULD BE HARMFUL to the community, if it doesn’t protect itself against HIM, AND he has to see DIRECTLY the devastating and unnecessary absolutely GARBAGE of his own political (TOXIC trash unfit for even fertilizer usage)… and he might have an epiphany.

    But we all seriously doubt it.

    Such lunacy is so without potential for any redeeming value, that to respond “in kind” as if the person has something of value to contribute to the debate of which direct ion a community shall travel forward, is so devoid of the potential for benefit to ANYTHING or ANYONE, that a brief frame of reference is the kindest thing one can do.

    Short of wringing the nose til blood spurts out and then kicking the posterior with considerable rammifications, til the person is ejected forceably from the room where the adults are discussing matters.

    Now the Indians wouldn’t recommend being so tolerant of such rank assinine behavior, because the chances that someone would think all that attention is an ENCOURAGEMENT for more of their intolerable conduct is way too high.

    As the hippies of the 1960’s have thoroughly established the which to be pure Wisdom in its kindest form, in today’s society in America.
    [/Professor Von Drake]

  37. #307834
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:58 pm, rightwingrocker said:

    Global warming is not going away.

    I’m still waiting for it to arrive, even when it does, it’s still not going to be all that hot, and then when it starts to cool off, we’ll be hearing you liberals talk again about melting the polar caps on purpose just to make the planet habitable.

    I’m not falling for the hoax, and you’re a fool for doing so yourself.

    Iraq is not going to become peaceful.

    The Iraqis have already demonstrated they’re quite peaceful. The terrorists there happen to be Iranians and Syrians, etc., in case you forgot.

    Americans are not going to uproot millions of illegal immigrants.

    Correction – illegal ALIENS. And Americans would be wise to send them packing and force them to follow the rules when they come back. That whole situation is an insult to our people, our law, and our culture.

    People will continue posting Italian flags on Italian restaurants and Mexican flags on Mexican Restaurants.

    No problem as far as I’m concerned, as long as they’re not displayed in any fashion that violates the standards of displaying the Stars and Stripes.

    The Spanish speaking culture in America will continue to be rich and vibrant.

    And I have no problem with this, either, as long as they are speaking English when they talk to or around me. There are plenty of situations where speaking in their own language is appropriate, so let them observe those.

    George Bush will not grow a brain or a conscience.

    He already has both in excess of your own.

    The gas tax holiday will not lower gas prices.

    Nope, sure won’t, but neither will continuing along the present environut course of punishing oil companies and restricting their future progress. Increasing refining capacity and drilling in ANWR will DEFINITELY reduce oil prices.

    Evolution will not cease.

    Hopefully it will weed our freaks like you as it goes forward.

    RWR
    http://www.rightwingrocker.com

  38. #307835
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:58 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Ombre Rose. Yes! Bingo Bango.

  39. #307836
    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:59 pm, William Amos said:

    Currently live on CNN at top is video of Pro immigration rally in Chicago

    http://www.cnn.com/

  40. #307838
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:01 pm, William Amos said:

    OK can go here to watch video

    Video

  41. #307845
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:09 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Longshore Union wakeup call and pop quiz:

    Why do you think Bush wants an open highway from Mexico to Canada?

    In your answer please include cheap labor in Mexico in new ports run by Dubai; cheap trucking with underpaid Mexican drivers in unsafe trucks; and how I will feed my family on unemployment after getting used to $240,000 a year running a crane.

  42. #307847
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:11 pm, sdillard said:

    Here’s the latest lifted from the San Francisco Indymedia website about today’s port strike:

    Longshoremen Proceed with May Day Walk Out
    by David Roknich ( roknich (at) electromagnet.us )
    Thursday May 1st, 2008 9:10 AM
    Minutes ago, I spoke with Clarence Thomas of the ILWU executive board. “The rank and file action against the war is indeed happening right now”, he said. And today the workers will write history.
    In an attempt to head this off last night the PMA went to court, but the judge refused to take any action, until there is concrete action by the union in violation of their contract. This is a rank and file action by union members who are united by their opposition to the war, and the disagree with the decision of the arbitrator who has dis-allowed the choice of May Day, by the ILWU, as a “day for union business” for workers at all 29 ports on the west coast. A “day for union business” is allowed by their contract. Their original intent was to use this day as their official protest, but official or not, the protest is on.
    Thomas affirmed that this is not to be confused with the negotiations between the union and their employers. The hard-won contract of 6 years ago is set to expire, and talks are going well. But on the issue of taking a day off for union business, the rank and file of Local 10 is going their own way and will close down the ports in protest of the ongoing wars of the Bush administration. This may be the beginning of a record setting anti-war action, since the vast majority of supplies and munitions for our current wars are shipped from the 29 ports on the West Coast, in california, Oregon, and Washington. All 29 will close today.

  43. #307857
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:19 pm, xler8bmw said:

    “Americans are not going to uproot millions of illegal immigrants”

    What you meant to say is………

    “Our Government WON’T Listen To The American People and uproot millions of illegal immigrants”!

  44. #307865
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:24 pm, lgm said:

    rightwingrocker said (#122):

    I have never been asked to press 3 for French, or 4 for Italian, or 5 for German.

    We shouldn’t have to press ANYTHING for ANYTHING.

    This is petty. “They can speak Spanish as long as I never hear it.”

  45. #307873
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:27 pm, jobusman said:

    How long before May is ” Immigrant month”

  46. #307877
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:35 pm, abstractmind said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:24 pm, lgm said:
    This is petty. “They can speak Spanish as long as I never hear it.”

    Bored now.

    You still haven’t really addressed the topic issue. Is it so hard for you to contribute something worthwhile? Or are we asking too much?

    I know you won’t actually post anything worth reading, or that isn’t immediately refutable, but it’s nice to point out how petty and small your arguments and comments really are…makes my day go by a bit faster..so thanks! ROFL

  47. #307882
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:38 pm, NJRepublican said:

    I work in shipping. Here’s an email I just got from a freight forwarder:

    In observance of International Labor Day, there is no workforce at any of the terminal on the US west coast today. For the LA/LGB terminals, they expect to resume operations this evening for the off peak hours.

    And 6 minutes later, I got this email:

    A MESSAGE FROM TERMINAL 46 – SEATTLE

    OUR GATE WILL BE CLOSED TODAY SINCE WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED THE NECESSARY ILWU LABOR TO CONDUCT OPERATIONS.

    WE WILL RE-OPEN AT 7AM TOMORROW MORNING (MAY 2nd).

  48. #307888
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:40 pm, lonecanoeist said:

    They are preparing to march into downtown Chicago as i type this. Seema one of their own didn’t realize that while C

  49. #307895
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:44 pm, expat said:

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

    Concerned Citizen #111

    If our esteemed elected officials actually understood what is in the Constitution that they swore to uphold and defend we could end a lot of problems that keep coming up. However with the libs constantly trying to monopolize “power” in office even understanding it would not make a difference. All of the “anchor” babies that keep illegals in the country can stay united with the family and go back with the family when they return to where they came from. It would be better for the child as the child is being brought up with the values of the country that the illegals entered the United States from, illegally. What part of illegal is hard to understand?

  50. #307901
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:47 pm, expat said:

    #111

    Got on a tangent. That is the wording for the 14th ammendment, lgm et al, and it clearly states that you need to be born subject to the jurisdiction of the united states. If you are here illegally and are not following the laws of the land and do not subject yourself to the jurisdiction of the United States you are not a citizen. With the states and the courts not subjecting the illegals to US law it only reinforces what the founding fathers wanted for our great country.

  51. #307904
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:49 pm, BlueEyedDevil said:

    All my fellow “right-wingers” in Southern California are forgetting the positive side of these marches: with all the illegals in downtown L.A. for the protests, they are not clogging the freeways. The commute to work (for those of us who do not work downtown) was great today. Can’t they march every day? Might serve a good dual purpose – make the legal electorate angry while clearing the roads of uninsured drivers and old, nearly broken-down vehicles.

  52. #307905
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:49 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    His t-shirt says: “I’m illegal. So what?”

    Ummm, so much for the “living in the shadows” nonsense!!! Some b*lls these invaders have. It’s like a bunch of children that realize there are no repercussions to their actions. This is what happens when we fail to exercise even a samll amount of punishment for bad behavior.

  53. #307907
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:50 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Hmm, anyone know the spanish translation of ” So what? You’re ass is mine, that’s what!”

  54. #307909
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:53 pm, xler8bmw said:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080501/ap_on_re_us/immigrants_discrimination;_ylt=AheC_HthNHi6FZnLdg3enNJvzwcF

    Great story!

    LINCOLN, Neb. – Anne Hobbs was angry. The head of the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission had just learned of a Hispanic couple who said their landlord asked for their driver’s licenses — but didn’t ask the same of non-Hispanic tenants.

    Hobbs said it sounded like the couple were “treated differently than everybody else because of national origin,” and sent the case to the state’s top prosecutor, hoping he would sue on their behalf under fair housing laws.

    When Attorney General Jon Bruning received the case, he was angry, too — for a different reason than Hobbs.

    “I’m not going to use taxpayer dollars to file lawsuits for illegal aliens,” said Bruning after learning the couple was in the U.S. illegally. “You’re not going to get a free lawyer” from his office, he said, “if you’re not a citizen of this country.”

  55. #307915
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:56 pm, puhiawa said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 8:10 am, 30 pcs of silver said:#7
    Ditto
    LGM. Ah Global Warming has gone away.Newsflash
    http://icecap.us/index.php/go/political-climate

  56. #307916
    On May 1st, 2008 at 1:57 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I’m illegal. So what?

    Yeah, err, it’s that whole illegal thing…

  57. #307924
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:00 pm, DesertLover said:

    MNUSMCDavid

    ¿quién cuida? su asno es el mío.

  58. #307931
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:02 pm, mattm said:

    As a college student i have a unique perspective on this. MY classes are M/W/F but yesterday one of the moonbat professors I have (who was supposed to be teaching WWI) went on a rant about Iraq/Immigration/Gas Prices, etc. He encourages student participation. So I participated and did my best to refute his moonbat claims. After a short argument he said “I know your a smart person but all that is is propaganda by the right. We need new leadership, ours is no better than Hither. We need workers rights because it is wrong to treat undocumented workers like we do…” With that myself and several others walked out of his class. Thankfully I only have tree classes left.

  59. #307932
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:03 pm, fred5676 said:

    Watch this SF Bay Area TV news story of what open borders has produced: anarchy in the workplace, $4 per hour serf wages, unsafe conditions, etc., in TWENTY manufacturing sites around the Bay Area.

    Great. Just great. Obama, Hillary, and McCain all want to encourage MORE of this crapola by REWARDING illegal aliens with precious U.S. citizenship and thereby invite another 30 million into our country in the next ten years???

    I will be writing in Tom Tancredo so I can sleep at night. Here is the solution at work in Georgia – attrition through enforcement is doing just fine, thank you.

    Money quote from the GA TV news video, “(with no drivers license and no ability to work) I have no choice but to go back to Mexico.”

  60. #307933
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:03 pm, madamevengier said:

    Our beloved country is so screwed.

  61. #307942
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:06 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Ahhhh thank you, DesertLover… going to make a tshirt with the moron’s quote then mine. If you ever need Celtic translations, I’d be glad to oblige..

  62. #307943
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:06 pm, guitarguy said:

    “If parents get sent back to Mexico, then the kids are going to be on their own,” she said.

    No.
    Parents are responsible for their children.
    When the parents leave, they should take their children with them.
    They are obligated to do so.

  63. #307944
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:06 pm, DesertLover said:

    MNUSMCDavid

    it’s a deal

  64. #307945
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:06 pm, abstractmind said:

    I hope that Jon Bruning gets a medal for upholding the rule of law…most likely, he’ll just get the shaft. :(

  65. #307953
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:10 pm, expat said:

    guitarguy

    Now don’t you know that you are being insensitive to the plight of the poor parents who are forced to separate from their children because the MEXICAN government will not allow Americans to immigrate? /Sarc off

  66. #307958
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:13 pm, guitarguy said:

    Folks, if we can’t resurrect Ronald Reagan, or if we can’t elect a candidate who actually has a pair between his legs, then I’m guessing we’re heading for another civil war.
    For the life of me, I just don’t see any other way of getting OUR country back.
    Something about a ‘…well armed militia…’ keeps running thu my head….

  67. #307962
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:15 pm, libertybelle said:

    Reposting in the correct thread… :)
    Scene:

    An early morning fundraising breakfast for a nonprofit literacy group that does a lot of very good work in Adult Basic Ed., ESL, and Citizenship classes.

    I am sitting at a table with some typical, urban, white, self-aggrandizing liberals.

    An ESL student from Ethiopia stands up, in front of approximately 175 people, and proceeds to demonstrate her hard-earned English skills in a speech. She thanks the literacy organization, her tutors, and lastly, she thanks America, and all Americans.

    She repeats this a few times at the end of lovely and adorable speech. “Thank you to America and all Americans. Without America I would never be where I am today. Ever. I appreciate America and all Americans!!!!!!” (Big, huge smile.)

    The applause was tepid and polite…and a woman at my table sneered, “Well, I certainly don’t appreciate all Americans,” with a slightly disgusted look on her face.

    When the obligatory George Bush joke made its way into the morning, the applause was thunderous, the smiles were large and gracious, and the eyes were twinkling.

    So, this brings me to my plan. Let’s deport all of the unappreciative, spoiled, ungrateful, snobby, typical, white liberals, and let in (amending this to say: LEGALLY let in) the people who love this country, and work hard to be successful – realizing how wonderful and amazing this place, and its people truly are.

    Yet again, I was privy to the shallowness of liberal ideals when I saw that they couldn’t even warmly celebrate this woman’s triumphs, just because she loves this country.

  68. #307963
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:15 pm, lgm said:

    abstractmind said (#141):

    Bored now.

    You still haven’t really addressed the topic issue.

    OK. You have heard all those “demands” before. They are commonly expressed opinions held be a majority or a significant minority of Americans. There’s no point in having a fresh tantrum every time you hear then.

    A very small minority of Americans wants to expel all 13 million illegal immigrants. A good fraction wants a path to citizenship for many of them. Many oppose militarized borders.

  69. #307965
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:16 pm, expat said:

    There you go again, addressing the finest document ever written and more specifically the dreaded second ammendment. Too bad the polititions don’t know about the 14th and the 10th and try to follow both.

    But as you just said, we need to get out heads out, breath fresh air, and get a fresh view on what’s going on. Not the MM people but Americans in general.

  70. #307970
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:17 pm, expat said:

    Egads!!! My post followed the seagull!!

    My apologies for any that think I am addressing that comment. I am still working with guitarguy.

  71. #307974
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:19 pm, xler8bmw said:

    lgm Wrong again pal!

    Most Americans want the government to stop illegal entry into the country before discussing what to do about the estimated 12 million people already living in the U.S. illegally, according to a poll released Friday by a conservative grassroots organization.

    The findings are “exactly contradictory to what the president said,” according to Steve Elliott, president of Grassfire.org. “He insisted that we have to have a comprehensive solution that would cover border security and amnesty and guest worker programs.”

    The poll of more than 1,400 Americans conducted Aug. 1-3 found that 73 percent of respondents view the illegal immigration situation as a “serious problem,” and 81 percent want the government to secure the borders before deciding what to do about illegal aliens already in the U.S.

    Similarly, a May 2006 Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll found that 86 percent of Americans view illegal immigration as either “very serious” or “somewhat serious.”

    Grassfire.org identifies itself as a “conservative, pro-family and pro-faith” organization of “hundreds of thousands of citizens.” The group encourages its members to join online petitions to “make a difference in our nation.”

    Elliott told Cybercast News Service that his group “support[s] legal immigration and, like most Americans, we want the borders secured and we don’t support [President Bush's] amnesty plan.”

    Elliott said Americans view illegal immigration as a serious problem “because of the terrorist threat, the security threat to our country.” He accused supporters of illegal immigration of ignoring that threat.

    As Cybercast News Service previously reported, illegal aliens of Middle Eastern descent have been able to blend into Mexican culture and pass into the United States while pretending to be Mexican.

    “Americans recognize that porous borders are a threat to our national security, and they want that solved as a top national security priority,” Elliott said.

    But Laura Reiff, co-chair of the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, believes the national security risk from illegal immigration is minimal.

    “The vast majority of the undocumented here are from CAFTA/NAFTA (Central and North American Free Trade Agreement) countries, mostly Mexico. I would say one in a million has any connection whatsoever to terrorism, if even that,” she told Cybercast News Service.

    “But,” Reiff added, “we do need to find out who’s here, who is amongst us, and that is the argument we use in the national security area for developing a program for finding out who the undocumented are.”

    “Everyone can agree,” she added, that there is a serious problem from illegal immigration. But, Reiff argued, the only way to fix the problem is for the government to offer an easier way to enter the country legally simultaneous to any crackdown on illegal entry.

    “You’re deluding yourself to say that you’re going to fix the problem by securing the border, because the border will never be secured,” Reiff said. “The only way to fix the problem of undocumented coming into this country and with the current undocumented population is to do everything at the same time … in one comprehensive bill.”

    The Grassfire.org poll did not ask respondents how they would deal with illegal aliens after securing the border, but a June 12 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll found that 50 percent of Americans favor a plan similar to the Senate bill that would build a 370-mile fence along the border with Mexico and grant amnesty to illegal aliens who have been in the United States for more than two years.

    In the NBC poll, one third of respondents favored the House plan, which calls for a 700-mile fence along the Mexican border and would deport aliens who are already in the United States illegally.

  72. #307983
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:22 pm, xler8bmw said:

    They’ve started in LA now

  73. #307987
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:24 pm, Azygos said:

    This may be the beginning of a record setting anti-war action, since the vast majority of supplies and munitions for our current wars are shipped from the 29 ports on the West Coast, in california, Oregon, and Washington. All 29 will close today.

    Way to go moonbats “we support the troops but not the war” crowd. Deny the troops the tools they need to fight the war. That really shows support for the troops. /sarc

    Yesterday I purchased three $10 starbucks cards. I went to the local Marine Recruiter office and was met by a young SGT. I handed him one of the cards and told him it was a small token of thanks for his service. I asked him how many people worked in the office (knowing that three usually work there) he said three so I produced the other two gift cards and handed them to him. I have never seen such a broad smile on a Marine. I urge others to show thanks and respect in a similar fashion.

  74. #307995
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:27 pm, RaisedRight said:

    [Someone has probably already commented on this by now, but...]

    “If parents get sent back to Mexico, then the kids are going to be on their own,” she said.

    Not true. The kids should remain with their parents… in a country where they are all legal citizens. Parents are supposed to take care of their children, not leave the country without them or use them as a means to subvert the system.

  75. #307997
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:30 pm, mojo said:

    OPEN CALENDAR! Yee-haw!

    They never learn.

  76. #307998
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:30 pm, libertybelle said:

    These people make me grumpy. That’s me saying it politely.

  77. #308001
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:31 pm, JonB said:

    I’ve seen a couple comments here and there about how the majority of Americans are against illegal immigration,and against all the “demands” these animals are spewing in the streets these days, but honestly, apart from blogs like this one, I think it is true. Most Americans support illegal immigration and the rest of it. Not actively, but by inaction. Sure, voters have voted down given them drivers licenses and all that. But that is like stopping surges here and there in the slow creeping invasion taking place. Most Americans are content to just say “oh, well the leaders of those protests have freedom of speech and are legal, so they have a right to vocalize their issues”, or “well, it’s not affecting me”. Most Americans are to obsessed with making sure they don’t miss the latest episode of whatever tripe is on the tube along with a good dose of the evening “news”.
    The closest we ever came to the kind of response needed was in the days just after 9/11. And I don’t mean the pathetic morons in the government pretending to spontaneously get together and sing God Bless America.
    This war is not just between the Citizens and the invaders, it is the Citizens against the government that is assisting the invaders in the name of getting more votes.
    We have allowed ourselves to be cornered, because oh-my-garsh do we need to get that new SUV, or that $800 BBQ that we’ll use twice. Obsession with the self has people sitting on their butts watching the TV instead of out where they should be, in the streets in numbers 20 or 30times that of these Pro-Illegal Immigration gatherings.
    I suspect that most of you on this blog, as well as a few others I read, are actively working to save this country, but until the majority of Americans get off their fat lazy ***es and get in protests of their own, this once great nation is going to continue to tailspin into destruction and our troops in Iraq will have nothing to come home to, if they can even get here.
    The “majority of Americans” deserve what is coming.
    -We allow illegal immigrants to protest openly in the streets.
    -We allow individuals to openly fly their countries flag over an upside down American flagg.
    -We allow people to burn the flag “in protest”
    -We allow people to do “studies” by inviting people to walk on the flag.
    -We put the people who protect our borders in jail
    -We allow groups like the ACLU to prevent us from taking actions that would thwart terrorists, such as profiling.
    -We allow individuals who rape children to walk free.
    -We allow rapists to walk free because “she was asking for it”
    -We allow lawyers to sue companies for not labeling hot coffee as “hot”
    -We allow anti-American people within our borders to constantly attack and erode our constitution.
    and the list goes on and on and on.
    ..And people claim we don’t deserve what will happen? Please.
    The “majority of Americans” are more worried about who is getting kicked off American Idol, saving the country can wait until the commercial break.

  78. #308009
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:35 pm, Hexadecimal said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 12:06 pm, lgm said:

    To quote Arlo Guthrie:

    I love Fidel Castro and his beard.

    This says to me everything I need to know about you: that you would support someone who robbed, raped, pillaged, and killed the people of Cuba in the name of Communist revolution (and his own grab for power). One of my brother’s friends is from one of the families who had their property confiscated in the name of the “people” of Cuba. They plan to take it back as soon as Communism in Cuba is put on the junk heap of history (hopefully when Castro meets his eternal “reward”).

  79. #308012
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:37 pm, bit_boy said:
  80. #308017
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:39 pm, emjem24 said:

    I’ve actually seen a May Day parade in Madrid, Spain and you would think that these people had it really bad. For some it’s an official holiday against capitalism. As an American student in the late 1990’s I could not comprehend what I was seeing.

    Just picture it: Spaniards in blue jumpsuits (uniforms that folks like painters wear in the city) marching, waving flags, some looking angry, others smiling, most protesting, some demanding their rights.

    Then again this happened when the Conservative prime minister (before socialism took hold again) was trying to reform a lot of the socialist programs that were created during the dicator Franco’s time.

    I wondered to myself: what would these people actually do with themselves if their government didn’t practice capitalism or local businesses didn’t create jobs?

    It would seem that the May Day “celebrations” haven’t lost their relevance. Too bad a lot of these participants are protesting on behalf of the many illegals who take American jobs, undercut American wages, and are paid slave wages by some greedy American companies who aren’t interested in the American Dream anymore.

  81. #308020
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:43 pm, gippergirl said:

    “If parents get sent back to Mexico, then the kids are going to be on their own,” she said

    am surprised at how quickly these parents are so quick to jettison their children…

  82. #308025
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:44 pm, abstractmind said:

    LGM, thanks for responding :)

    OK. You have heard all those “demands” before. They are commonly expressed opinions held be a majority or a significant minority of Americans. There’s no point in having a fresh tantrum every time you hear then.

    A very small minority of Americans wants to expel all 13 million illegal immigrants. A good fraction wants a path to citizenship for many of them. Many oppose militarized borders.

    I believe, however, that xler8bmw pretty much hit the nail on the head.

    I would direct your attention to a simple google search, titled “polling data for american immigration”.

    http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=research_researchd74c

    The statistics in the article speak for themselves:

    89% of Americans think illegal immigration into the U.S. is a problem (30% “extremely serious,” 33% “very serious,” and 26% “somewhat serious.” (Time Magazine, Jan. 2006)

    82% think that not enough is being done along the borders to keep illegal immigrants from crossing into the country. (New York Times/CBS May 2007)

    68% feel that the number of immigrants who cross the border, whether legal or illegal is “too high”. (Polling Company, Sept. 2006)

    62% oppose making it easier for illegal immigrants to become citizens of America. (Quinnipiac Univ., Feb. 2006)

    51% opposed the DREAM Act (a form of amnesty for former and present illegal alien students) concept.

    68% believe the passage of the bill would encourage more illegal immigration in the future.

    71% believe that illegal immigrants should not qualify for in-state tuition rates at colleges and universities.

    77 % oppose making drivers’ licenses available to illegal immigrants.

    Where do any of those percentages constitute a minority?

    and you’re right…we have heard all of those demands before. Too many times, by my count. The majority (referenced above) are sick and tired of people who don’t belong here, who have abused and broken our laws, and have the audacity to DEMAND we change for them when this is OUR home and land. You know full well how Mexico treats and handle illegals, do you not? What’s good for the goose, as the saying goes.

    And just to put this in perspective…IF there are 13 Million illegals, and we have a population of say, over 300 million people…doesnt that make THEM the minority to begin with? Just saying.

    I dont consider having a fence along our border as “militarizing” unless there are guns mounted on it. We put fences around our yards to keep others out, why should our border be any different?

    It boils down to the following of our laws. Either you’re obeying the law, or you’re not. These illegals marching and demanding we change the law, so they arent breaking it anymore, goes against the very spirit of the laws that were created for this very purpose.

    To support them is to support lawlessness, laziness, illegal behavior, and the breaking down of our society and way of life in general. This behavior cannot go unchallenged, and cannot go unpunished.

  83. #308036
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:50 pm, corona said:

    Yes, this is another “if Reagan was President” posts.

    Remember the air traffic controllers?
    Do you, George?

  84. #308037
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:50 pm, Jim M. said:

    Nice of the illegals to promote a commnist holiday. It says a lot about what their real intentions are.

    If that is what they really want, let them have their Holiday today, and then we can bring in some Spetnatz forces to use communist tactics to enforce the law.

  85. #308038
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:50 pm, emjem24 said:

    lgm said:

    OK. You have heard all those “demands” before. They are commonly expressed opinions held be a majority or a significant minority of Americans. There’s no point in having a fresh tantrum every time you hear then.

    A very small minority of Americans wants to expel all 13 million illegal immigrants. A good fraction wants a path to citizenship for many of them. Many oppose militarized borders.

    Any proof to your assertions? Or are we to take your word again? Studies? Polls?

  86. #308045
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:54 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:15 pm, lgm said

    Prove it big mouth. Show the polls that support your claim the majority of Americans support these ridiculous and idiotic demands. I mean it. You just make crap up. Not one poll has EVER showed the majority or even close to the majority support these demands. Again, pea brain, EVERY poll taken shows the overwhelming majority OPPOSE amnesty. They differ on the solutions to this horrific problem plaguing us, but that is very different than supporting amensty. Please let me know which college hired such an idiot so I am sure to not send my chidren there. Jesus.

  87. #308060
    On May 1st, 2008 at 2:58 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    I see abstractmind is on the ball today, thanks for helping state what to the rest of sane America is the obvious. But I won’t hold my breath for any logical response from our chief troll on this one.

  88. #308065
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:00 pm, abstractmind said:

    I just happen to have had coffee early enough this morning to function today, but thanks…i at least try to offer something intelligent to the discussion :)

  89. #308067
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:01 pm, rooster said:

    Weary Citizen, #181

    This imbecile is polluting minds at a university in New York. Someone on this blog has his home page.

    I agree with you 100% on this idiot. He is not trying to air any legitimate points, he is wanting to just be argumentitive.

  90. #308068
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:02 pm, DagneyT said:

    Their calendar includes the “Festival of Tolerance and Unity” in Aurora, CO;

    I left my birth state of Colorado because it was becoming (as we native Colordoans call it) “Californicated”. I remember when Aurora, CO was conservative. :-(

  91. #308070
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:02 pm, DagneyT said:

    Make that, “Coloradoans”

  92. #308072
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:03 pm, DagneyT said:

    And I used “preview” for a change. I’m hopeless!

  93. #308076
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:04 pm, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    Awww screw it…I was going to come up with something pithy about May Day then realized it just ain’t worth commenting about.

    It’s why a barfly calls New Years Eve “Amateur Night”…It’s when all the rookies come out to play.

  94. #308120
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:21 pm, Boomer said:

    The picture of the illegal invader with the “arrest me and deport me now” shirt really bothers me. Where the heck are the Chicago PD stormtroopers with their full automatic M-4 Carbines? Oh! That’s right they are harassing legal citizens instead of protecting them from these illegal invaders. Today is turning into a real blood boiler for this bitter God fearing gun clutching veteran American citizen! :twisted:

  95. #308121
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:21 pm, spudmomof6 said:

    Celebrate May Day by enrolling your business in e-Verify! Or all you HR people, volunteer to sign up as an administrator. It’s easy and free, and they teach you all of the rules so you don’t illegally discriminate against someone in refusing them employment.

  96. #308130
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:27 pm, Weary Citizen said:

    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:01 pm, rooster said:

    Agreed. My apologies to all for feeding the troll but I get a little worked up on this subject. I am of the belief that if we do not halt further illegal immigration and embark on a policy of ATTRITION THROUGH ELMINATION OF MAGNETS to rid ourselves of these parasites our country is doomed (along with my children’s futures here). The moment we give amnesty of any kind, we: 1) send the message to the world that all they must do is get here and squat long enough before amnesty is granted AGAIN 2) 20M-30M illegals granted amensty will swell the population at least 4 fold to 100M-120M in 5 years. Why? Chain migration and family reunification! Each of these new citizens will petition to bring in their children, parents, cousins, uncles etc. Of course each of those will have relatives to bring in as well. My guess, is 4-5 will be bourght here for each illegal granted amensty. We saw the same thing after 1986. At that point, there will sufficient immigrant voting block loyal to other countries that we passee americans will no longer be able to control our own destiny. Not to mention most of these new americans would love to get some freebies form us underserving Americans so we will steadily march toward socialism even faster. Hold on to your wallets.

    And if the gov’t tells us 12M illeglas are here, you can bet it will be 3X that many seeking citizenship wiht amnesty. In 1986, kennedy and the ilk estimated 1M would be amnestied. When all was said and done, 3M were. Time to stop being compassionate and start thinking about preserving our country before it is too late.

  97. #308142
    On May 1st, 2008 at 3:34 pm, allrsn said:

    LGM

    a majority or a significant minority of Americans. There’s no point in having a fresh tantrum every time you hear then.

    A very small minority of Americans wants to expel all 13 million illegal immigrants. A good fraction wants a path to citizenship for many of them. Many oppose militarized borders.

    I have seen you demand documentation several times. You never provide your own documentation!

    Where is YOUR documentation for those silly numbers?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The “media justice” mob strikes again

October 30, 2009 12:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Witch hunt.

Lou Dobbs discusses physical attacks, harassment

October 29, 2009 10:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Culture of Corruption: Obama U.S. Attorney nominee clams up

October 28, 2009 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 1 Trackback

Stephanie Villafuerte, evader.

Yes, Senate Dems do want illegal alien Obamacare coverage

September 30, 2009 03:10 PM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 1 Trackback

House Dems push for illegal alien health care coverage

September 28, 2009 09:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 9 Trackbacks


Categories: Immigration



The Other McCain

» Paralysis by analysis

Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

HotAir GreenRoom