Flag desecration of the day: Bill Ayers stomps on Old Glory

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 5, 2008 07:35 AM

Here’s your Monday morning blood pressure-raiser.

Put your coffee down before clicking.

The full Chicago Magazine article, titled “No Regrets,” is here with the color photo.

You know, conversations about that photo will not help the Obamas’ kids

And in case you missed it, make sure you read John Murtaugh’s piece on how the Weather Underground terrorists tried to kill his family. Video here.

Like the Arizona Republic editorial board put it today: The 60s just won’t go away.

Here’s your letter of the morning from Greg Phares in today’s WSJ:

Elizabeth Wurtzel (”Obama’s Other Radical Friends,” op-ed, May 2) can be forgiven her youthful fascination with radical bomber Bernardine Dohrn. We all have ideas at 15 that seem silly from the perspective of middle age. Barack Obama’s reported close relationship with Ms. Dohrn and Bill Ayers is much more troubling and raises legitimate questions about his judgment and maturity.

In a 33-year law-enforcement career I had occasion to arrest many charming criminals. One of the most engaging was a California radical, rapist and prison escapee associated with the Symbionese Liberation Army (remember them?) who was living in Louisiana. When, after an intensive undercover investigation, I confronted him with his true name, he stuck out his hand and said “You must have talked to them in Oakland.” Indeed I had, and what I learned was chilling.

From all accounts, Mr. Ayers and Ms. Dohrn are equally charming. That does not nullify their crimes. Placing a bomb is one of the most evil of acts because the effects of a bomb are totally indiscriminate and incredibly devastating. Just ask a young Iraq War veteran who will live the rest of his or her life minus body parts. Just ask the families of those killed by Timothy McVeigh in the Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

There is little moral difference between Mr. Ayers and Ms. Dohrn and McVeigh. Timothy McVeigh was simply a less charming individual and a more successful bomber. He received just punishment for his crime. Mr. Ayers and Ms. Dohrn did not.

Greg Phares
Baton Rouge, La.

***

Previous: Barack and Michelle and Bill and Bernardine: The Obama/Weather Underground compendium

Also: I linked Tom Maguire’s excellent post last week, but here it is again for those who might have an opportunity to subject Obama to the Ayers/Obama/Chicago Annenberg challenge. An excerpt (go to the posts for all the links):

One might well ask – how would Obama characterize his involvement with the Chicago Annenberg Challenge Fund?

…How closely did Obama work with the fund’s executive director, Ken Rolling (and what does Mr. Rolling have to say about this)?

What did Obama know of Bill Ayers’ involvement (which the rest of us now know to be extensive)?

Eventually, the CACF was viewed as a failure (the final report says it had “little impact”) – what did Obama learn from that?

Finally, there is a question of shared values; setting aside Ayers’ bomb-tossing proclivities of the 70’s, he has a very hard left approach to education; for example, he explained to Hugo Chavez and a Venezuelan audience that public education was a way to promote the revolution…How much of this did Obama know then? Or is this just another situation, as with Jeremiah Wright, where Obama simply didn’t know anything about the fellow with whom he was associating?

Posted in: Bill Ayers

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. UrbanGrounds
  2. What I’m Reading Instead of Working » Pursuing Holiness
  3. silent E speaks - Conservatively Speaking from Western Waukesha County » Guilt By Association
  4. The Conservative Pulse: Conceal and Carry, Obama and Abortion, Talking with Marxist Children, and more at The Liberty Preservation Alliance
  5. Must See PHOTO: Obama’s Other Friend - Bill Ayers « ~ NonBlondQT ~
  6. Badger Blogger » Blog Archive » But don’t question their patriotism!
  7. The Dan Lee Report » Blog Archive » Bad Company, til the day I die, “The Obama/Ayers Story” (American Flag trampling included.)
  8. Theodore's World
  9. Heading Right! » Blog Archive » GUILTY AS HELL, FREE AS A BIRD. IT’S A GREAT COUNTRY
  10. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » The Ayers Stomp…..On Obama
  11. UNCoRRELATED
  12. Bill Ayers Stomping the American Flag : Stop The ACLU
  13. PAXALLES
  14. Bill Ayers proudly stomps the American flag | Infidels Are Cool
  15. Michelle Malkin » Obama and Hillary’s Ethanol Flip-Flop
  16. The Radio Patriot
  17. Obamas Friend Bill Ayers Stomping On American Flag - No Regrets : BigMouthFrog
  18. The Other McCain: Future GOP campaign ad?
  19. The Patriot Room
  20. Obama Wants to Redefine Patriotism | The Patriot Room
  21. The 1960s in the 2008 Election « Axis of Right
  22. Conservative Central,is a grassroots blog site,goal keeping Conservative majority Congress,Conservative President. » Blog Archive » » Number 1 Dirt Bag, Bill Ayers
  23. Jules Crittenden » No Regrets
  24. The Baltimore Reporter
  25. Beacon Street Journal » Blog Archive » Obama’s Friend Bill Ayers Has “No Regrets”
  26. With Friends Like This… « A Political Dookie
  27. Michelle Malkin » Liberal math: Unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist equals…
  28. “Palling Around With Terrorists” and “Progressives For Obama” « The Political Page
  29. Open The Door And Air Ayers OUT « Mcnorman’s Weblog
  30. Obama Shuts Down riggword, blogger jailed! « Riggword Weblog
  31. William Ayers - Terrorist - Expedite Trucking Forums
  32. Patriotic Friday « Sunny Inspiration
  33. Mr. President, Do You Believe In American Exceptionalism? | hillbillypolitics.com

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #311542
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:14 pm, valleygreaser said:

    Wasn’t this picture of Ayers taken somewhere around the time he was launching Obama’s political career? What was it about Obama that made Ayers think he was his kinda guy? I hope these questions are thoroughly explored once Obama is the nominee.

  2. #311548
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    #179, I damn well CAN say I love my country while advocating the arrest of those whose views I find offensive. You pull a Benedict Arnold, John Andre or any other seditious traitorous act, I’ll do more than advocate.

  3. #311553
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:20 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 1:50 pm, Rusty said:
    Burning a rainbow flag isn’t against the law, so, uh, your point is lost on me.

    Stand outside the office of a gay-rights group in San Francisco and burn a rainbow flag. Wear a button that says “God hates Fags.”

    Let me know if you get charged with a hate crime.

  4. #311555
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:21 pm, Mohawk said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, mistressjustice said:

    Americans don’t have constitutional rights to Not to be Offended. A person doesn’t hate his country just because he refuses to fly into a blind rage at the sight of some moron standing on a flag 7 freaken years ago. There are more important issues to get all in a tizzy about.

    Really sorry you feel that way!

    What about this nation does fill you pride?

    For me.

    IT’S MY FLAG!!!!

  5. #311563
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, franksalterego said:

    The Irony is, of course, the people who excuse Flag-burning, are the very same people who get “outraged” at the sight of a noose.

  6. #311566
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:32 pm, Mohawk said:

    Mistress,

    I really do not understand how you can not be extremely upset with another American that bombed our capital and police stations, did no jail time and 40 years later is photographed standing on top of Old Glory posing for an article where he states he has no remorse for his actions. In fact he says they did not do enough.

    Our fore father would of put this man to death upon a guilty verdict. Either that or tarred and feathered his treasonous ass!

  7. #311587
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:39 pm, USN RET said:

    Now we know why Obama wouldn’t wear the flag pin. He was afraid Ayers would stomp on his chest. But now that he has Secret Service protection, he can wear it.

  8. #311600
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:43 pm, Lee Hazel said:

    Obama and Clinton, what a pair.
    Obama can sit for 20 years listening(?) to the sermons of an avowed black separatist and not hear a word.

    Clinton has memory loss every time she is confronted with past white house behavior or actions of her current staff.

    And these two feel they are qualified to lead the most complex and powerful nation on earth!

    Unbelievable
    the know-nothings and do-nothings will get us
    LEE

  9. #311602
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, Rusty said:

    Stand outside the office of a gay-rights group in San Francisco and burn a rainbow flag. Wear a button that says “God hates Fags.”

    Let me know if you get charged with a hate crime.

    Fred Phelps, with his “God Hates Fags” signs, staged a protest at Matthew Shepherd’s funeral. No arrests were made.

    Now, burning a rainbow flag on a gay couple’s doorstep, then we’re talking “hate crime.” But just burning a rainbow flag on your own property or during a larger anti-gay protest…that’s all fine and dandy because our Constitution allows it.

  10. #311603
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, lgm said:

    libocrat said:

    OFFICIAL LIB-TARD QUOTE OF THE DAY.
    Todays winner is Rusty.

    Congratulations, Rusty. The better your point, the more it annoys the con-tards and the louder they have to shout to drown it out.

  11. #311606
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:45 pm, BrianNY said:

    #187 said:

    I damn well CAN say I love my country while advocating the arrest of those whose views I find offensive. You pull a Benedict Arnold, John Andre or any other seditious traitorous act, I’ll do more than advocate.

    I agree. General examples of this include publishing a battle plan, giving intelligence to the enemy and diminishing your capabilities to aid the enemy.
    #190 said:

    The Irony is, of course, the people who excuse Flag-burning, are the very same people who get “outraged” at the sight of a noose.

    Agreed. It’s my observation that “the shoe on the other foot” test doesn’t always work out well for political liberals and moral/philosophical relativists.

  12. #311615
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, jsr said:

    I may not be able to keep Ayers from desecrating my flag but I can damn sure vote against anybody who calls him friend.

    I agree 100%. Furthermore conservatives should not be ridiculed for holding people accountable for their disgraceful actions, or those of their associates. People may claim this right and that. So be it but don’t whine when others pass judgment on moronic behavior.

    This whole desecration of the flag issue has been discussed, rehashed, and beaten to death for the past 30 years. (For once, I agree with Rusty.) One of the major problems that laws or amendments that would criminalize desecration of the flag is what is considered desecration? Would the flag only be protected from “hateful actions” or also from careless disrespect? Is wearing American flag clothes disrespectful? How about a towel?

    Of course, if America haters are allowed to desecrate the flag then there should be no sanctions for so-called hate speech. If others can burn the American flag, I can burn Rainbow flags to express opposition to gay marriage. I also reserve the right to burn posters with the likeness of Martin Luther King Jr. in public as a way to express my displeasure with affirmative action, or hang nooses for that matter. Since I’m expressing my opinion with these acts I’m sure the liberals will understand this is constitutionally protected free speech.

  13. #311616
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, Mohawk said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 1:39 pm, aironlater said:

    It’s quite sad to see so many people complaining about this simply to just ‘complain’. You provide no ’solutions’ for this alleged problem, you just try to make it more of a problem. You seem to care more about a ’symbol’ than you do the country that it is intended to represent. Your attempts to tie so many things together makes your original argument completely invalid. It appears that the Conservatives are no longer ‘for’ anything but ‘against’ everything.

    Just to get this out of the way – yes, this is my first commment on Malkin’s blog. No, I am NOT a conservative.

    Welcome to the site troll.

  14. #311620
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:49 pm, abstractmind said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, lgm said:
    libocrat said:

    OFFICIAL LIB-TARD QUOTE OF THE DAY.
    Todays winner is Rusty.
    Congratulations, Rusty. The better your point, the more it annoys the con-tards and the louder they have to shout to drown it out.

    I personally prefer the “speak softly and walk with a big stick” ideal.

    But if you’re going to talk, you might want to do so, while remembering stuff you’ve posted elsewhere you claim you didnt even say. I busted that just a bit ago, no?

    Rusty makes a valid point, his personal politics aside. But at least he has the class to defend himself without resorting to ad hominem attacks, and manages to do it with a bit of class and intellect. I dont always agree with him, but he’s head and shoulders above you in these things.

    You would do well to take his example to heart.

  15. #311623
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:51 pm, aironlater said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:47 pm, Mohawk said:

    Welcome to the site troll.

    If anything, people here are quite predictable…….

    how about responding to my post and not my post count

  16. #311634
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:55 pm, libocrat said:

    Abstractmind, you couldn’t bust a junior high pot party.
    I’m really not impressed with your running your cake hole.
    I’m afraid your claim is invalid and I’m remain un-busted. Run along big shot.

  17. #311638
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:56 pm, Mohawk said:

    I got a solution for you then troll.

    How about make the flags out of non flammable material.

    Let me ask you this if I go up to the Statue of Liberty which in all essence is just a symbol of our nation and spray paint F the French what do you think would happen. It’s just a symbol for America right!

  18. #311645
    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:59 pm, tgusa said:

    When I was growing up the noose was a popular object something about it fascinated many of us boys you might see it doodled on a folder. Many of us wanted to know how to tie one I think it had a lot to do with Nuremburg as well as the westerns that were popular in those days. Throughout our history the noose has been an important symbol of you do this you get that. No wonder they want to outlaw even the image of it isn’t that oh so islamist of them? Today everyone gets worked up because the democrats hijacked that symbol and turned it toward evil, I’m sure that is a shocker huh? I played a lot of hangman in my youth that helped me with spelling and word recognition but I still to this day have never hung anyone, well excepting stick men, I find that incredible. Besides while I might attend a hangin I would let someone else be the hangman. Of course I used to watch the Three Stooges too but haven’t hit anyone in the head with a hammer or lead pipe either. Don’t get me started on that violent hate show Coyote vs. Roadrunner.

  19. #311647
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:02 pm, abstractmind said:

    air,

    i’ll address you personally :)

    There are alot of things I am for and against, and we dont have the time to sit and go over them. For this thread directly, I’m for free speech. I personally detest flag burning. But I also have to uphold what the law states at present is acceptable, like it or not. If they passed a law to prohibit flag burning, i’m all for it. I can’t say its my champion cause, but i dont agree with it either.

    How to solve the problem? You can legislate it so that its illegal. That’s really the only fix that works. I would say teach more respect for our country and culture in our schools, but…with people who are running the show now, that most likely wont happen.

    Work calls, so…but thats a start.

  20. #311648
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:05 pm, aironlater said:

    If you feel that it would make you feel better to spraypaint, then do it. I know that this is just a reflexive statement you are making, but why would you even want to do that? the same question could be posed to Ayers, why does he do what he does? That’s what you have to figure out. You can do something stupid to counter something else stupid, but what have you gained.

    In my opinion, the symbol seems to now hold more power than the actual ‘thing’ it is symbolizing.

    And honestly, I don’t have the answers to issues like Ayers, though I wish I did. The larger point is, it is the conservative movement that is making the issue out of him and they don’t have the answers either.

    So, once again – what is your solution?

  21. #311657
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:09 pm, aironlater said:

    How to solve the problem? You can legislate it so that its illegal. That’s really the only fix that works. I would say teach more respect for our country and culture in our schools, but…with people who are running the show now, that most likely wont happen.

    sure, you can attempt to legislate ANYTHING into the catagory of ‘illegal’, but that won’t prevent it from happening, and will take up time and resources better used on other areas of American life.

    From my own perspective, I would really love to know why people like Ayers and Wright think and act the way they do without devolving into speculative generalizations. What good does that really do?

  22. #311660
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:10 pm, dakine said:

    abstractmind, valleygreaser and mistressjustice showing how it’s done. libocrat, not so much. libocrat, you’re not too bright, you’re rude and obnoxious, you have no class or honor, and you’re completely lacking in manners and common courtesy. Other than that, you’re ok though, you crazy, dim witted tool, you. ;)

  23. #311662
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, Regulus said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 12:07 pm, Chard402003 said:

    When you add America hating Ayers and America hating Wright and the “I’ve never been proud of my country” wife, Obama’s refusal to wear a US flag pin might take on a little more meaning than it would otherwise. Is it just coincidence that all of his associations seem anti-America?

    That cuts straight to the heart of the matter. From Ayers/Dohrn to Wright to his disgusting wife, Obama appears to instinctively gravitate toward people who hate this country, or who hate white people, or both.

    And his proffered rationalizations for this pattern and practice simply don’t add up. Obama is the perfect embodiment of Peggy Noonan’s observation to a Democrat friend of hers: “You desperately want to rule America, but you don’t seem to like Americans very much.”

    Even if Obama’s own character isn’t suspect, his judgment of others’ character certainly is. And when it’s the presidency that’s on the line, both of those are legitimate areas for scrutiny and concern.

    ————————–

    As to the flag issue, I find it puzzling that so many liberals, who so often think, speak and act in terms of symbolism and symbolic gestures, can only partially grasp that the American Flag is one of the most potent symbols on the planet. On one hand, surely the act of desecrating the flag is symbolic of one’s hatred of all it stands for; they can wrap their heads around that. Yet when it comes to wanting to honor the flag, or to protect it, or taking offense at those who spit on it, stomp on it or burn it, suddenly it becomes “a piece of cloth.”

    For example, I remember a written account from the prisoner of war repatriation ceremonies following Korean War. From one group of American POWs – all of whom were in horrific condition from their time in captivity – one tried to make his way toward the Americans’ flag detail. But he was too weak to make it. He stumbled, then fell; yet onward he crawled to the flag until he reached it, clutching it and sobbing until finally an Army Major picked him up and carried him to the transportation that would take him the rest of the way to freedom.

    The entire American delegation was moved to tears as it watched; even reading about the incident more than 50 years later, I can’t keep my eyes dry.

    Yet to a liberal, there’s evidently no meaning there at all.

    “Just a piece of cloth.”

    What liberals’ thinking about the flag boils down it is hypocrisy, plain and simple: “My symbols – like the bloody coat hanger, or the mug of Che Guevara, or the homosexual rainbow, or the ‘Black Power’ fist – are important, but yours don’t matter… unless I want to sully them.”

  24. #311665
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:12 pm, mymanpotsandpans said:

    If anything, people here are quite predictable…….

    And bitter

  25. #311666
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:13 pm, abstractmind said:

    sure, you can attempt to legislate ANYTHING into the catagory of ‘illegal’, but that won’t prevent it from happening, and will take up time and resources better used on other areas of American life.

    then air, whats your solution? I never claimed mine was perfect. But its better than complaining, right?

  26. #311668
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:15 pm, henryinga said:

    #178, you said people were complaining, ‘just to complain’. Why else do you complain? You also separated the ’symbol’ from the country. Read our posts. We’re complaining because, the ’symbol’ of this great country was desecrated by this scumbag. You can’t separate the two; they go together like bacon and eggs, Tom and Gerry, and Ayers and Obummer. You didn’t have to tell us you weren’t a conservative, your post told us that. That’s not meant as a put down, just an observation.

  27. #311669
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:15 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Jack asses like Ayers do it for the same reason two year olds have temper tantrums; for the reaction they get from people who get angry and carry on about it.

    So when I see someone do that I just remind myself that I’m proud to live in a country where, excepting a handful of idiots like Ayers, I and most of 300,000,000 of my fellow citizens respect our flag. Because we have no law to force that respect it means that it can only be coming from one place – from the ONLY place that really matters – our hearts.

    The minute you pass a law against it, whatever comes from your heart won’t matter anymore and these handful of idiots will have won. Don’t let them; just turn your back on them.

  28. #311672
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, aironlater said:

    then air, whats your solution? I never claimed mine was perfect. But its better than complaining, right?

    Yes, it is better than just complaining. However, the end must justify the means. Unfortunately, the issue of flag-desicration most likely will have no perfect solution.

  29. #311682
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:21 pm, BrianNY said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:12 pm, mymanpotsandpans said:

    If anything, people here are quite predictable…….

    And bitter

    And clingy to guns and religion, right?

  30. #311684
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:22 pm, libocrat said:

    How about pissing on q’rans/korans?
    Can we do that too?

    Talk amongst yourselves.

  31. #311688
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:23 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    The perfect solution is to do nothing. Do we really need to pass laws to prevent a handful of idiots from acting like idiots? Do you really think that’s gonna stop em’? Do you really think that’s not gonna encourage more of em’?

  32. #311691
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:24 pm, abstractmind said:

    Air,

    you’re correct, as far as it not having a perfect solution. its a tough call either way. I would rather see something done, thats not perfect but at least reasonable and that really shows what the majority clearly believes, than to see nothing done at all on the matter.

    As far as ends and means…I personally like the latin phrase Exitus Acta Probat ;)

  33. #311692
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:24 pm, aironlater said:

    #178, you said people were complaining, ‘just to complain’. Why else do you complain? You also separated the ’symbol’ from the country. Read our posts. We’re complaining because, the ’symbol’ of this great country was desecrated by this scumbag. You can’t separate the two; they go together like bacon and eggs, Tom and Gerry, and Ayers and Obummer. You didn’t have to tell us you weren’t a conservative, your post told us that. That’s not meant as a put down, just an observation.

    Oh, I read the posts, and I still stand by my original statement that this seems to be nothing more than complaining for the sake of doing so.

    Tell me, honestly, what exactly are you doing to promote you cause. By that, I mean something besides responding to blog comments from me.

    My point is that ’symbolism’ – to many people – is more important than action or the actual ‘thing’ that the symbol represents.

    oh, and it’s Jerry…………..just an observation ;)

  34. #311712
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:36 pm, undrseige247 said:

    aironlater said:

    How to solve the problem? You can legislate it so that its illegal. That’s really the only fix that works. I would say teach more respect for our country and culture in our schools, but…with people who are running the show now, that most likely wont happen.

    Right, The only way to create a conservative revolution is for people to get as angry as the Flower Children did back in 68′. Get Angry, Take to the streets and get inside the system. Conservatives stomping their feet all day will do nothing. It’s the next step for conservatives otherwise they could face extinction.

  35. #311721
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:43 pm, libocrat said:

    Regulus, what a great post. Liberals like to push the envelope. They are madly in love with the CONCEPT of RIGHTS. And the obstinantly defend those who abuse (my opinion) their rights. Just because you have a right, doesn’t mean you HAVE TO exercise that right. It’s lawful to piss your pants. But libs don’t do that. But what speaks volumes about libs lack of character is that they use THE RIGHT to defend the behavior.
    They are more concerned with Ayers RIGHT to shit on the flag, than they are concerned with defending the honor of their country. It most cases liberals are CLEARLY not bothered by people shitting on America. (figuratively speaking).
    So they cite some RIGHT to sh!t on America and defend that right. But they don’t defend their country.
    (generally speaking).
    Yet we cannot question their patriotism, because they are defending a RIGHT.

  36. #311724
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:45 pm, libocrat said:

    Undrsiege, Bill Ayers (Jeusu Obama’s friend) displayed how he felt about an America that he felt excluded from. He bombed NYPD, the Pentagon, robbed armored cars, shot cops and guards and he is a lib hero now. He is gainfully employed by the Uiversity of Chicago if I’m not mistaken.
    Do you think libs would hire Tim McVeigh?

  37. #311730
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:47 pm, Wade said:

    Tell me, honestly, what exactly are you doing to promote you cause. By that, I mean something besides responding to blog comments from me.

    Many of us have already done our part and we have paid for the opportunity to complain. Rather than you whining about what others have done, maybe you should take your own advice and do something yourself, I mean something besides responding to blog comments from others. Dr heal thyself.

  38. #311743
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:54 pm, Mohawk said:

    Hey,

    You know what I am just a bitter American clinging to my flag and guns right aironlater?

    Just an ignorant no good American that pays his taxes, obeys the law, and leaves others to their own.

    I consider the desecration of the American Flag just the same as I would treat a person that kills and American Bald Eagle, just the same as if they attacked or blew up the Washington Monument. I consider these all American Icons that should be protected by the federal government against desecration.

    But you can ignore me I am just a bitter clinging to my guns American.

  39. #311747
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:55 pm, aironlater said:

    Many of us have already done our part and we have paid for the opportunity to complain. Rather than you whining about what others have done, maybe you should take your own advice and do something yourself, I mean something besides responding to blog comments from others. Dr heal thyself.

    If what you say is true, then that’s great. But are you suggesting that you no longer have an obligation of ‘doing anything’ so you can just complain all you want?

    And, in response to your clever ‘Dr. Heal Thyself’ comment, I contribute to the causes I believe strongly in.

  40. #311748
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:55 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    We have the court system and gvt. we deserve.
    Ayers – his wife and et. al. would have been shot as traitors 200 yeras ago. Now they have positions as instructors.

    We must organize groups to counter the likes of the ACLU-LA Raza – MALDF ….

    And no more :
    LESSER OF TWO EVILS!!!!!

  41. #311749
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:56 pm, henryinga said:

    Air, I’ve written my Senators and Congressmen, to no avail, I admit, but I have done that, because when you mess on the Flag, you mess on the people who have died defending it. Just maybe,if enough of us complain,our representives will pass a law making it a crime to dececrate the Flag. By the way—-it’s YOUR cause–just another observation.

  42. #311753
    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm, henryinga said:

    I’ll be away for awhile, later, guys and gals.

  43. #311757
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:01 pm, aironlater said:

    Air, I’ve written my Senators and Congressmen, to no avail, I admit, but I have done that, because when you mess on the Flag, you mess on the people who have died defending it. Just maybe,if enough of us complain,our representives will pass a law making it a crime to dececrate the Flag. By the way—-it’s YOUR cause–just another observation.

    There are many Americans complaining about MANY things, but it often takes stronger actions than phone-calls and emails to get things done.

    You have to be able to find the balance between being a person like Ayers and a person that just emails and makes a few phone-calls

  44. #311760
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:01 pm, Surveyor said:

    Words cannot express the anger I feel towards anyone who would stomp on or set fire to the flag of this great nation, or anyone who would support such behavior.

    So I am going to have to leave it at that.

  45. #311766
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, libocrat said:

    henryinga, do you remember the time that Sinead O’Connor ripped up a picture of the Pope. It offended millions of people, billions perhaps. She didn’t care and used the American Constitution to her advantage. Liberals, freaks and nuts try to do the same using Old Glory. I’m not certain that we cannot outlaw it, but be that as it may, they are acting out for the expressed purpose of offending most Americans and America. Liberals discard that pesky Patriotism, in favor of protecting and preserving the RIGHT (though disputed in some circles) of shitting on America.
    They’d whistle a different tune if we started burning MLK’s picture or publically destroying, burning or desecrating the Koran.
    Some of the bigger loons, will claim that they’d support those disgusting displays too, but by and large liberals are immature hypocrites.

  46. #311782
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:09 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Dear Trolls-
    For all the patriots that have served under the American Flag, lost friends in defense of America, and whose families have buried their sons/daughters/fathers/mothers the flag isn’t just a piece of cloth-its a tanglible symbol of what we find GREAT in this country.

    Freedoms that most of the world only dream of-the freedom to protest against a government, the freedom to write a letter to the editor of a newspaper, the freedom to own a gun, the freedom to worship according to ones own conscience, the bill of rights, and a constitution that no other country on this planet can match.

    Just because you have the freedom to do something, doesn’t mean you have the morality to do it.

    I, Paul K. Fischer, hereby challenge any liberal to defend a conservative that descrates a rainbow flag, smears feeces on a Koran (for the sake of art), calls a gay person a slur (eg fag, queer, wuss, and etc) or demand the same race based academic scholarsips be given to the most persucted group on our nations college campuses today-the Christian, heterosexual, conservative, white-male.

    Talk is cheap, put your money where your mouth is.

    If this sounds harsh, I put a simuliar challenge out to my liberal college professors that have constantly blamed America, BDS, the war and etc and if this country is so bad-I will donate $100 to any liberal that wants to emigrate to the socialist country of their choise with the condition that you renounce your American citzenship and don’t return.

    So far no takers…The ball is your court trolls-do you have cajones or are you a coward that enjoys the protection that my friends provide? Men and women with guns, standing a watch, willing to die for their country and they do so out of Honor, Duty to Country and God giving sacrifice. There has never been so great a debt to a few from so many.

    GSP

  47. #311785
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:11 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Surveyor, you summed it up nicely –

    Words cannot express the anger I feel towards anyone who would stomp on or set fire to the flag of this great nation, or anyone who would support such behavior.

    Which is EXACTLY why they do it – to make you angry! Why don’t people understand this point? I think most parents understand it so maybe you never had little kids? They do the same thing in other ways – pushing buttons.

  48. #311836
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:24 pm, Rusty said:

    GSP, you have the right to smear feces on a Koran. I wouldn’t recommend it since it’s so despicable (kind of like, you know, flag burning), but you have that right.

    Calling people slurs is starting to push it though. And if you think the “the Christian, heterosexual, conservative, white-male” is the most persecuted person on campuses, you are out of your gourd. But you certainly have the right to say such a thing. You just did! LGM and I aren’t going to call the thought police!

  49. #311841
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, aironlater said:

    Dear Trolls-
    For all the patriots that have served under the American Flag, lost friends in defense of America, and whose families have buried their sons/daughters/fathers/mothers the flag isn’t just a piece of cloth-its a tanglible symbol of what we find GREAT in this country.

    True, people that have served and had friends/family that have served feel a great connection to the flag. However, many also realize that a ‘flag’ doesn’t replace a person. You should also realize that people that those who use the memories of soldiers killed in battle in order to win an argument do so because they think they hold moral superiority – which they do not. They only lesson their words by doing this.

    I, Paul K. Fischer, hereby challenge any liberal to defend a conservative that descrates a rainbow flag, smears feeces on a Koran (for the sake of art), calls a gay person a slur (eg fag, queer, wuss, and etc) or demand the same race based academic scholarsips be given to the most persucted group on our nations college campuses today-the Christian, heterosexual, conservative, white-male.

    Why should I – or anyone – defend someone else for something stupid they do?

    If this sounds harsh, I put a simuliar challenge out to my liberal college professors that have constantly blamed America, BDS, the war and etc and if this country is so bad-I will donate $100 to any liberal that wants to emigrate to the socialist country of their choise with the condition that you renounce your American citzenship and don’t return.

    It’s always amazed me that conservatives can’t see the difference between blaming a ‘policy’ and ‘blaming America’. Sure, it’s effective spin and works well with your base, but that’s about it.

    And BDS, give me a break. If you want to defend George W. Bush, you go right ahead. I won’t stop you from looking like an idiot.

  50. #311846
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, terrig said:

    Rusty, Little Girly Man, Sausage, et. al trolls of the Keyboard Warrior Brigade (because we know it’s as close to serving in any military branch you trolls will ever get), you don’t get it, you’re proud of the fact that you are able to stomp and spit on the flag. You are button pushers that’s for sure, ergo you really are no more than a bunch of 2 y/os at a playground.
    However, twerps who vote for Obama, well you’re idiots.

  51. #311861
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, Surveyor said:

    Danceswithdachshunds

    …..yes I have a 3 yr old and a 11 yr old and I have first hand knowledge of the button pushing kids can do….but….not-getting-out-of the-bounce-house-when-dad-tells-them-too-anger is quite a bit different than stomping on my flag kinda anger….know what I mean?

  52. #311863
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:32 pm, SPCOlympics said:

    lgm: Did you cover the Republican Congressman who gave a speech at a local branch of the US NAZI party? Did you post the picture of the Congressman posing in front of the swastika? Did you rant about McCain accepting the endorsement of a man he had called (rightly) an “agent of intolerance”?

    That wasn’t a Congressman. That was Tony Zirkle, an attorney and Congressional candidate running as a Republican. Note that he hasn’t been selected as THE Republican that will be on the November ballot and considering his very public and controversial racist views, he won’t win the primary.

    He is not very deserving of attention because he’s a racist loon that is not welcome in the Republican party.

  53. #311865
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:33 pm, aironlater said:

    Rusty, Little Girly Man, Sausage, et. al trolls of the Keyboard Warrior Brigade (because we know it’s as close to serving in any military branch you trolls will ever get), you don’t get it, you’re proud of the fact that you are able to stomp and spit on the flag. You are button pushers that’s for sure, ergo you really are no more than a bunch of 2 y/os at a playground.
    However, twerps who vote for Obama, well you’re idiots.

    That’s strange, I never once said that I was ‘proud’ that I was able to stomp or spit on anything.

  54. #311867
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:35 pm, terrig said:

    Surveyor, I had something else but I changed it because I knew I would get banned. It does make me sick that we have people like the trolls who are/were on welfare and have no shame, who think obummer is the 8th wonder of the world and who are absolutely clueless when it comes to persecution on the college campus. But I don’t want to get banned and I have to get ready to pack for a flight first thing tomorrow morning to Chi town for my Aunt’s funeral. I will speak to my former Sgt cousin who was just here telling me how he’s persecuted by profs like the little girly man and students like rusty, sausage, et al.

  55. #311871
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, terrig said:

    238, I don’t know nor do I care who you are but it appears you admit you’re a troll of the Keyboard Warrior Brigade.

  56. #311872
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:
    …pull a Benedict Arnold, John Andre or any other seditious traitorous act, I’ll do more than advocate.

    John Andre?!

    NOW there’s a Revolutionary War buff talkin’.

  57. #311873
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:38 pm, Surveyor said:

    10-4 terrig.

    Be safe on your trip. :)

  58. #311876
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, aironlater said:

    238, I don’t know nor do I care who you are but it appears you admit you’re a troll of the Keyboard Warrior Brigade.

    Exactly my point. You simply just complain, that’s it.

    It’s rather saddening to see that so many of the preconceived notions about reactionary conservatives are in-fact true.

  59. #311877
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, terrig said:

    Thanks Surveyor! Have a great evening.

  60. #311884
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:44 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:25 pm, aironlater said:
    You should also realize that people that those who use the memories of soldiers killed in battle in order to win an argument do so because they think they hold moral superiority – which they do not. They only lesson their words by doing this.

    You mean people like Cindy Sheehan?

  61. #311887
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:45 pm, tgusa said:

    Gunslinger patriot is right only I would not offer them a nickel I would make them an offer they couldn’t refuse. We have too many laws already we can barely leave our homes without committing some offense virtual or otherwise. As offensive as it is why should we create more laws because of them? As a matter of fact I have long suspected that the liberals are hoping we make a law against this then they will use it as they usually do, to perpetuate more fascistic behavior against us. There are so many contradictions in our country today I can barely see the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as they were written anymore. No the best solution is to exercise your rights right out in the open in their faces. Expose the hypocrisy two can play this game. The islamists are not going to stop eventually we will have a mega explosion the day of liberal atonement is fast approaching aided in large part by liberals themselves, morons.

  62. #311892
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:48 pm, abstractmind said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:41 pm, aironlater said:
    238, I don’t know nor do I care who you are but it appears you admit you’re a troll of the Keyboard Warrior Brigade.
    Exactly my point. You simply just complain, that’s it.

    It’s rather saddening to see that so many of the preconceived notions about reactionary conservatives are in-fact true.

    Just in the interest of being fair, would it not be accurate to point out that you are doing the very thing you’re accusing someone else of? Preconceived notions, reactionary/complaining statements, and so on?

    Not saying someone else doing it makes it correct, but, you can be above that sort of thing if you choose.

    End of my day coming up, see everyone tomorrow :)

  63. #311895
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, aironlater said:

    You mean people like Cindy Sheehan?

    clever…..

    No, I mean people that have not served in the military and haven’t lost a son/daughter/mother/father in armed conflict -

    like Sean Hannity

  64. #311897
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:53 pm, aironlater said:

    Just in the interest of being fair, would it not be accurate to point out that you are doing the very thing you’re accusing someone else of? Preconceived notions, reactionary/complaining statements, and so on?

    Not saying someone else doing it makes it correct, but, you can be above that sort of thing if you choose.

    End of my day coming up, see everyone tomorrow

    Yes, I have preconceived notions, but I hardly see myself as ‘reactionary’. I am simply attempting to engage in a discussion with people who espouse ‘conservative’ values. However, it seems that the discussion generally revolves around making up names for people, making wacky generalizations, or just avoiding the issue all together. Sometimes if you want to actually connect with someone you have to try and get down to their level of discourse. Not my favorite things to do, but I have been accussed of being an ‘issues based elitist’.

  65. #311908
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, undrseige247 said:

    aironlater said:

    It’s always amazed me that conservatives can’t see the difference between blaming a ‘policy’ and ‘blaming America’. Sure, it’s effective spin and works well with your base, but that’s about it.

    Take your liberal ethos and shove it in your dirt chute putz. Don’t come here with that game.

  66. #311910
    On May 5th, 2008 at 4:59 pm, franksalterego said:

    Here’s how I internalize it.

    Would this little pencil-necked weasel have the balls to stand on the Flag, if he didn’t have the law to protect him?

    At the end of the day, it doesn’t descetrate the Flag…The Flag is what it is…He could stomp it, all day long, and we wouldn’t be one bit less proud of it.

    He, and he alone, is what is despicable…He is the disgrace.

    Anyone, associating with a scum-bag like this, is just as despicable.

  67. #311912
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:00 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Kaos Klerik…. aye aye, sir… guilty as charged… actually a warfare buff… while not totally well versed… dangerously so…

  68. #311916
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, aironlater said:

    Take your liberal ethos and shove it in your dirt chute putz. Don’t come here with that game.

    It appears that I have struck a chord. That’s generally a sign that you have found a person’s weakness.

  69. #311919
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:02 pm, abstractmind said:

    Air,

    While its true that sometimes people do that here, there are some of us here that don’t mind a good discussion. I don’t lower myself to the level of people being ignorant. I do my best to raise their level to something that is able to discuss what’s going on.

    Time for me to go, so…but, don’t lower yourself for the sake of participation, regardless of whether its firing off at your opposition, or by lambasting trolls :)

    Favorite quote my friend uses:

    “don’t argue with an idiot. They’ll bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.”

    Raise the level, air. You can do it. I’m sure i’m not perfect at it, but the better you sound, and the more you make your points valid with facts, the more intelligent people will talk! :)

  70. #311925
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:06 pm, aironlater said:

    Air,

    While its true that sometimes people do that here, there are some of us here that don’t mind a good discussion. I don’t lower myself to the level of people being ignorant. I do my best to raise their level to something that is able to discuss what’s going on.

    Time for me to go, so…but, don’t lower yourself for the sake of participation, regardless of whether its firing off at your opposition, or by lambasting trolls

    Sometimes I do just for the shear snark factor, other times it’s just the easy route. But, considering the above response to why conservatives shout “why are you blaming America first” – well, you can see my point.

  71. #311929
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Surveyor (#236), Not obeying isn’t what I’m talking about; I’m talking about the temper tantrum that some 2-3 year olds try when they don’t get what they want. Getting angry at them generally does nothing to stop them because they’re doing it for attention. When my 2 year old daughter tried it at a toy store when it was time to leave I just started walking away like she wasn’t there and BINGO! That scared her and she never tried that again, (well, with me at least). These idiots who desecrate the flag don’t do it at 3:00AM secluded in their basements – they do it for the attention they get. It puts them in control of those getting angry at them. If nobody paid any attention at all to them – I doubt most would ever bother trying it again.

    Getting angry at them, threatening them, etc. is only flattering them for their effort. They’re obviously brain damaged to be desecrating the very symbol of their freedom to do that so why kowtow to such moronic behavior? In a way I kinda pity them for how stupid they are. If there’s one thing that can destroy a person it’s giving them pity where none was sought.

  72. #311930
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:17 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:
    #179, I damn well CAN say I love my country while advocating the arrest of those whose views I find offensive. You pull a Benedict Arnold, John Andre or any other seditious traitorous act, I’ll do more than advocate.

    AMEN Semper Fi David

  73. #311939
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, Surveyor said:

    Danceswithdachshunds

    I completely understand what your saying and I agree…..it is just extremely difficult to ignore asinine behavior from some folks in this country….even though that is pretty much all we can do……for now.

  74. #311950
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:19 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 3:11 pm, Regulus said:
    #208

    Thank you. Honor and pride in ones country.

  75. #311951
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:20 pm, Rusty said:

    you’re proud of the fact that you are able to stomp and spit on the flag.

    Yes I am. Because I wouldn’t be able to in Saudi Arabia, Iran, or the People’s Republic of China.

    It does make me sick that we have people like the trolls who are/were on welfare and have no shame, who think obummer is the 8th wonder of the world and who are absolutely clueless when it comes to persecution on the college campus.

    Um, I’ve never been on welfare. I’m not supporting Senator Obama (although I will once he gets the nomination), and I am far from clueless when it comes to “persecution on the college campus.” When I was in school, the College Republicans were doing just fine.

    Well, except for this little imbroglio.

  76. #311960
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:23 pm, graysonret said:

    It isn’t burning the flag, spitting on it, or stomping on it, that bothers me. Heck, for $10, I can run to the store and get a new one. It’s what it stands for, and what it represents. Basically, a slap in my face is what it is. It’s an attack on what I hold dear to my heart…liberty and freedom. What’s worse, Ayers believes in it too. That’s why he is here, and why he “uses” it. He just wants to provoke and get his minute of fame, just like someone you meet who wants to pick a fight with you, except in his case, he does it “long distance” as cowards tend to do. He’d run before defending his so-called “cause”, or hid behind some legality. I have no patience with people like that. Either fight your cause, or run away. Stomping on the flag in an alley…. Come on, jerk, stomp it in public around a lot of people. Blasted coward; no patience with this guy.

  77. #311961
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, undrseige247 said:

    aironlater said:

    It appears that I have struck a chord. That’s generally a sign that you have found a person’s weakness.

    No, watching you pontificate like you’re pretending to be Barbara Boxer behind the lecturn is what’s getting me sick. All you have is some hackneyed mode of persuasion that you picked out of The New York Times. Your ethos is a jinglebell with no balls. But by all means keep writing…

  78. #311964
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:24 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #260 …Did you go to USF?

    Earlier this year, SFSU put its College Republicans on trial before a campus tribunal for stepping on makeshift Hamas and Hezbollah flags during an anti-terrorism rally.

  79. #311966
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:25 pm, KaosKlerik said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, Rusty said:

    Stand outside the office of a gay-rights group in San Francisco and burn a rainbow flag. Wear a button that says “God hates Fags.”

    Let me know if you get charged with a hate crime.
    Fred Phelps, with his “God Hates Fags” signs, staged a protest at Matthew Shepherd’s funeral. No arrests were made.

    Ok, skip the button. The point is that what is and is not considered a hate crime is usually a left-wing interpretation.

  80. #311974
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:28 pm, bear1909 said:

    The more I read the liberal toadies on this blog, the more I am convinced this Nation will fall from within.

    Four of the scariest words running through my small mind:

    “They are allowed to breed.”

    eww.

  81. #311975
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, libocrat said:

    Like I’ve said liberal fairy boats like aironlater, would shyte their panties if MLK was burned in effigy.
    Or maybe a picture of one of his mothers was burned??

  82. #311977
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:29 pm, undrseige247 said:

    Rusty:

    So back on topic I told you, as matter of fact, you can be arrested for burning a Rainbow Flag under the Hate Crimes Act of 2000 which you completely ignored. Just trotting along in your own little world…

  83. #311980
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:30 pm, aironlater said:

    No, watching you pontificate like you’re pretending to be Barbara Boxer behind the lecturn is what’s getting me sick. All you have is some hackneyed mode of persuasion that you picked out of The New York Times. Your ethos is a jinglebell with no balls. But by all means keep writing…

    Priceless. You are doing nothing but furthering the stereotype that conservatives try to so hard to be above. Yeah, I’ll keep writing from MY OWN perspective that is gained from MY OWN experience. But please, keep up with the conservative talking points, makes my job all the easier.

    So, would you care to engange in a conversation about what I originally said, or would you rather continue with the textual-tantrum you’ve started?

  84. #311983
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:31 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #234 – Correction to my previous post. That was SFSU not USF. Le oops!

  85. #311985
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:32 pm, Salt said:

    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:28 pm, bear1909 said:

    Four of the scariest words running through my small mind:

    “They are allowed to breed.”

    eww.

    That’s 5 words, Bear. :)

    Only pointing it out before one of the lefties do.

    (Unless I missed the joke.)

  86. #311987
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:34 pm, aironlater said:

    Like I’ve said liberal fairy boats like aironlater, would shyte their panties if MLK was burned in effigy.
    Or maybe a picture of one of his mothers was burned??

    Are you so certain that I AM a Liberal?

    How do you know that i would ’shyte’ myself?

    Oh, and do you know one of my mothers?

    Seriously, it’s so easy for you guys to get away from a subject just for the sake of trying to compartmentalize people you have no knowledge about. But, if it makes you sleep better at night to try and rationalize your tilted view of who I might or might now be – by all means – go right ahead, it’s good entertainment on my end.

  87. #311993
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:36 pm, Salt said:

    n May 5th, 2008 at 5:30 pm, aironlater said:

    So, would you care to engange in a conversation about what I originally said, or would you rather continue with the textual-tantrum you’ve started?

    Any chance you all (aironlater and everyone else involved in the “I’m complaining about Conservatives complaining” thread-jack) could get back on topic instead?

    Don’t mean it harshly… Just sayin’.

  88. #311998
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:39 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    feebes #263
    My point well taken.

    To the trolls-
    Everything I described in #231 has occured on our college campuses, and I have been subjected to the most vile of comments from the gay community, some of my black classmates in my sociology classes and gave up count the number of anti-military/BDS comments, and pro Palestine/gay rights/whites as victimisers/America is evil ad nauseum since I returned school.

    You see this not only in the classroom by the profs, but in the school paper by the stories they publish and editorials they print, the list of accepted school clubs that are approved by the student council and the list could go on.

    The day my school (University of Memphis) gives conservatives the same rights of academic freedom liberals have, then and only then will I take back my post.

    This post isn’t coming from an 18-21 year old, but a 40 year old veteran that has seen more countries than most of my profs and grad student profs have ever seen or heard about.

    BTW-I have the audio proof from my Racial and Ethnic Minorities class that backs up my claims! The rest weren’t worth the cost of microcassettes.

    GSP

  89. #312001
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:40 pm, aironlater said:

    Any chance you all (aironlater and everyone else involved in the “I’m complaining about Conservatives complaining” thread-jack) could get back on topic instead?

    Don’t mean it harshly… Just sayin’.

    gladly……….

    threadjacking was not my intended purpose, but sometimes you have to address the idiocy when it’s thrown your way.

    That being said, are people like Ayers THE problem? It appears, to me at least, that these people are elevated to the status of ‘icon’ in order to rationalize why one certain movement is more important to America than another.

    Personally, I don’t approve of Ayers tactics ( that being the bombings – though it should be noted that he was aquitted of ALL charges ).

  90. #312011
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:44 pm, feebiebabe said:

    That being said, are people like Ayers THE problem? It appears, to me at least, that these people are elevated to the status of ‘icon’ in order to rationalize why one certain movement is more important to America than another.

    :roll:

    Waiting for Spontaneous Human Combustion to occur in 3,2,1……

  91. #312020
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:47 pm, Rusty said:

    Underseige, I had never heard of the Hate Crimes Act of 2000. I did some googling and realized it’s not federal law. I’m not really up on what the New York Legislature is doing (save for maintaining their “Albany girlfriends”).

    Anyways, I read the legislation and your conclusion isn’t correct. Burning a rainbow flag out of protest is not a hate crime. Burning a rainbow flag and leaving it on a gay couple’s doorstep would be criminal mischief and therefore would qualify under the Act. But that’s apples and oranges.

  92. #312023
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, undrseige247 said:

    aironlater said:

    Priceless. You are doing nothing but furthering the stereotype that conservatives try to so hard to be above. Yeah, I’ll keep writing from MY OWN perspective that is gained from MY OWN experience. But please, keep up with the conservative talking points, makes my job all the easier.

    So, would you care to engange in a conversation about what I originally said, or would you rather continue with the textual-tantrum you’ve started?

    This is my whole point, you’ve said nothing.
    “quod erat demonstrandum”

    But by all means, keep writing…

  93. #312025
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:48 pm, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    The connection between Obama and Ayers is that they live in the same neighborhood and sometimes sit in the same room. Fox has the extra tidbit that Ayers contributed $200 to Obama’s campaign. Ayers never has been convicted of a crime.

    Doesn’t mean one is innocent, LGM. And you know, it WOULD be a crime if he did that to your precious Koran. But I guess the American flag isn’t as good as collection of twisted prophecies.

    Did you cover the Republican Congressman who gave a speech at a local branch of the US NAZI party? Did you post the picture of the Congressman posing in front of the swastika? Did you rant about McCain accepting the endorsement of a man he had called (rightly) an “agent of intolerance”?

    If it’s so important (and if it actually happened like you said) post some LINKS, please. Maybe you haven’t noticed, but your own personal testimony doesn’t carry weight, LGM. I know you probably think you’re an “educated” liberal, but on here, we have to SEE it to believe it, okay?

  94. #312027
    On May 5th, 2008 at 5:49 pm, aironlater said:

    Waiting for Spontaneous Human Combustion to occur in 3,2,1……

    Seriously, the only reason that Ayers is even an issue right now is because of his ‘connection’ ( limited and flimsy as it is ) to Obama.

    If the Republican party had this type of scrutiny of their own candidates, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Mudville Gazette

» War costs money (2)

Green Room

» Going Un-Framed?

Mudville Gazette

» Surrender, he whispered

Pundit & Pundette

» The rebirth of Rom Houben
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook