On May 7th, 2008 at 5:04 pm, SteveH said:

And this is the essence of the Left’s position on just about everything.

It’s not about what’s right or what’s good. It’s about figuring out a way to get people to accept the socialism/communism that they aspire to.

Steve is right on the money.

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

Remember we were all asked to remember Rev Jeremiah Wright’s good works…but last year Imus was fired in the middle of his radiothon for children’s charities The Tomorrows fund, S.I.D.S and the Imus Ranch for Children with Cancer. How come his good works didn’t count? Obama and Rev J Wright insisted Imus should be fired for satire in context NHH so whats up with that? Obama I wouldn’t have someone like Imus working for me. No I guess he wouldn’t how does Obama’s judgement calls work? Is it all Black and White? I don’t know because he won’t answer the question why Imus but not Wright?

Also important to note that Obama said he wouldn’t have someone like Imus working for him, and at precisely that time, he had Jeremiah Wright, whose remarks are infinitely more racist and inflammatory, WORKING FOR HIM.

Inexcusable.

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

You are distorting Ayers.

I ain’t distorting SQUAT.

This man was a major part of an organization that admitted to being responsible for SEVERAL terrorist attacks on the US, and declared war upon her.

You don’t do that unless you hate the country.

The Vietnam War, regardless of the number of deaths, was an honorable undertaking with the greatest of objectives: keeping communists away from people who did not want to live under its yoke. By any military measure, we were winning before the liberals convinced the fools in Washington to give up.

It’s the same drill they’re using with the War on Terror. By any reasonable measure, we’re kicking tail and taking names in both Afghanistan and Iraq, yet had the libs had their way, Saddam Hussein would still be running torture chambers and rape rooms. The error of the war has been laying off of the terrorists in Iran and Syria, who are surrounded and would easily be put away.

But what the heck. Stopping terrorism and Communism aren’t all that important now, are they? After all, that’s exactly what the libs want to live under here in America.

Losers.

The guy running for President is Obama, not Ayers. Obama didn’t endorse Ayers and has not had much to do with him.

Obama has had a whole lot to do with Ayers. Don’t try to misrepresent that. They worked together in a big way, and when someone like Obama keeps that kind of company on a regular basis (people do surround themselves with those of like mind), as is evidenced by his association with Ayers, Mr. Wright, and Michelle Obama, it is undeniable that Obama is much of the same.

If you’re buying his crap, then you deserve what you get under his administration, should he win.

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

um, no, he regrets NOT SETTING OFF MORE BOMBS ON U.S. SOIL.

/nice try to defend the indefensible there tho …

We must include:
- Help Al Gore find his Gulf Stream jet
- Help Harry Reid find his land deal
- Help William Jefferson find his refrigerator
- Help Teddy Kennedy save Mary Jo
- Help Jesse Jackson identify his kids

The material is endless

On May 7th, 2008 at 6:23 am, ajmontana said:

I especially like ajmontana’s suggestion.

http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2008/05/media-buzzzz.html

Ayers DOES hate America, and has said he regrets not being more active in anti-US terrorism.

1. You are distorting Ayers. He regrets that he did not do more to stop the war in Vietnam. It’s not anti American to want to stop a disastrous war that resulted in an estimated 3 Million dead. Even if it’s wrong, it’s not anti American (one wishes wingnuts would figure this out, but they never do).

2. The guy running for President is Obama, not Ayers. Obama didn’t endorse Ayers and has not had much to do with him.

Nasty smear … it’s nothing to be proud of.

It’s not a smear if it’s the truth.

Honestly, I don’t see anything in this that can be called a “nasty smear” or “nothing to be proud of”. Quite frankly, it’s all quite creative, and he who created it should be proud.

Each and every assertion is absolutely true. Wright does decry materialism AND does simultaneously live in the very materialistic manner he decries. Ayers DOES hate America, and has said he regrets not being more active in anti-US terrorism. The Word Search is also dead-on – and ALL of these things are relevant to any discussion of Barack Obama.

This is no smear, and these facts may very well cost Obama the election.

We can only “hope”.

HAHA

RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com

On May 7th, 2008 at 9:11 am, lgm said:
Nasty smear … it’s nothing to be proud of

That would be an endorsement then.

Are we picking on your pastor?

(Taken from a story about Elonore Roosevelt. A flasher opens his coat in front of her. She calmly looks him up and down and says: “Sir, you have ….”)