Malkin is a marketing genius, but in politics she is A. Complete. Idiot.

40 PERFECT Senators is not better than 55 Senators. Yeah, you lose a few high profile votes. But with 55 Senators you write the bills.

Most who are against illegal immigration also are against hard right wing “solutions”, like mass deportation of 13 million illegal immigrants, building a fence or militarizing the border, and even denying social services to illegals.

If you want to work with Democrats to reduce illegal immigration, you could look for things you both support: requiring employers to follow the law (otherwise they would be criminals, as you often say about illegal immigrants).

Democrats don’t seem to have much interest in it. It helps them to get voters from impoverished immigrants as your party deceives them with promises of stuff like free health care.

All many on your side of the aisle want are votes.

Enforce minimum wage and workplace safety laws. Sanction employers who knowingly hire illegals (Romney, McCain, ..).

I’m all for that, but I also know that toothless, wimpy, sensitive liberal men are incapable of the necessary confrontations. Maybe if Harry Reid would stop pandering to Islam on the Senate floor, you party may not, waste all of our tax money.

You also might consider extending labor laws to cover farm workers.

LGM, most of the full-time, are not like liberal city-folks who cower in fear over being called a racist or islamophobe or working over 35 hours a week. These folks aren’t afraid to get their hands dirty, and work and long hours.

They really don’t need the government in their lives. All they want is some advantage over the super-rich. Many of them abhor liberal policies and want the government to stay away!

From a former USDA worker.

Toomey would rather spend $1 million to beat a Republican in a primary than to take on ANY Democrat.

Imagine the bills that would be written if Pelosi, Reid and company weren’t RUNNING the House AND Senate.

Malkin is part genius (marketing, new media) and PART BIG-TIME IDIOT (politics, and frankly media savvy).

when it comes to politics, Malkin (and Toomey) believes a solid Republican Party with 40 votes in the Senate is the way to go. This way we can guarantee to have a 100% unified party, all the time, to veto socialist bills. (I prefer before, having 55 votes, designing the bills, getting a lot of them passed, and OCCASIONALLY losing a few when 6 or so Republicans cave for some reason or another).

Regarding media savvy, here is how it works. 1) AP and NY Times journalists write an article about how some Republican broke ranks. 2) Forward article to Malkin or wait until she finds it. 3) Count to 3 and click refresh to see Malkin foaming at the mouth to get said Republican out of Congress. 4) Wait for Pat Toomey to write check to beat said Republican. 4) Repeat.

Go to Club for Growth web site. For some reason they SCORE the Reps and Senators. There are Senators that score 10’s and 0’s by the Club’s standards. Who does Toomey spend his money on– the Democrat that scores a 0 on growth, or the Republican with a 50?

Thank you for providing me with the comedy I need to start my day. Reading your posts and seeing how out of touch you really are brings a smile to my face. With people like you voting it is no wonder people like B Hussein O and Shillary are actually in the running. That America is still a soveriegn nation is truly remarkable. People like you would give up our soveriengty and willingly give up your freedom. I pity you and pray to God that you are looked out for.

I have to go now and weep a little bit.

How many strikes do you want?

You can believe any poll you wish, but polls are notoriously skewed by any number or factors: questions asked and not asked, sampling techniques, statstical analyses, reporting biases, etc.

A SeeBS/NYT (you wouldn’t label them “hard right wing,” would you?) poll reported May 27, 2007 showed that 69% of those polled said people here illegally should be prosecuted and deported. 24% said they should not. More notably, 64% of those calling themselves Democrats said they should be prosecuted and deported. 29% said they should not. Of course, even liberals may not have noticed that “little” fact, because the “unbiased” SeeBS/NYT didn’t report it until the next to last page of the pdf file I found online. Nor did the “unbiased” SeeBS/NYT report until the very last page that in the polled sample, Democrats outnumbered Independents and Republicans, 413 to 391 to 328.

Lest you doubt those “unbiased” numbers, a July 7, 2007 Qualtrics online poll found that, “…68 percent of respondents favor deportation as an answer to illegal immigration…” Sorry, but no statistics were given as to sample size, etc. in that report. But since you have ESP, you can probably devine them for the rest of us and report back, eh?

In short, anyone can come here and say anything. Including you. And me. That’s why Ms. Malkin cites her disclaimer. But if someone calls you, or me, on something we write, don’t get bent out of shape and cite ESP or liberal garbage (I know that’s redundant) and expect to get away with it a la St. Hillary, Messiah Obama or Bridge on the River Kwai McCain.

If your claims are based on valid data, they will stand the light of scrutiny by others. Obama may be correct about us being Bible-thumping, gun-toting, bitter people, but we’re not stupid, too.

If you were interested, you would google “illegal immigration fence opinion polls” or something like quicker than you could post here. The fact that you instead posted here tells me you’re not interested.

Polls as proof!!! BWAAAHHHHAAAA

Your an idiot!

The guy was talking about poll numbers. He said 70% of Americans are against illegal immigration. I said yes, but they’re also against deporting all of them. He said prove it, and here we are. You’re calling him an idiot, not me. And he’s a fellow Republican.