About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Anti-illegal immigration mayors win in Texas

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 12, 2008 11:21 AM

Voters who are sick and tired of open-borders anarchy have spoken in Texas. Via WBAP:

The two beacons of illegal immigrant exclusion laws won the mayor’s office yesterday in their respective cities. Farmer’s Branch voters elected Tim O’Hare over Gene Bledsoe by a wide margin, with Irving voters deciding to re-elect Herbert Gears to lead their city with 54% of the ballots.

Both O’Hare and Gears have spearheaded the fight to exclude illegal immigrants in their cities attracting the ire of Washington D.C., the focus of the national news media and the desperation of other American mayors who want to follow in their footsteps looking for a solution to the national issue of undocumented workers.

One neighborhood, one city, one state at time, Americans are taking their destiny into their own hands.

Sovereign Nation or Sanctuary Nation: It’s your choice.

Posted in: Immigration

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:23 am, Jaded said:

    No matter what the MSM and all the Presidential candidates say…American’s are sick of this crap and they will fix it…as you say one city, county, state at a time…very good news Michelle.

  2. #2
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:27 am, WarTip said:

    Again, my hope still rests with the state and local governments. I have given up hope on the federal system but moments like this give me hope that we still have a chance and all is not quite lost just yet.

  3. #3
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:29 am, Barry F. said:

    Let’s hope what O’Hare and Gears have is contagious and catches on with other politicians on the local, state and federal levels.

  4. #4
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:30 am, mkarnes2007 said:

    Carrollton elected a new mayor over the weekend who vows that ridding the city of illegal aliens is his top priority.

  5. #5
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:31 am, ACHefty said:

    Woo-HOOO!

  6. #6
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:31 am, ajmontana said:

    V.I.C.T.O.R.Y.

  7. #7
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:32 am, sambo said:

    Jaded and WarTip…yall have a point but there efforts will do no good if Juan/Obama X makes all the illegals, legals.

  8. #8
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:33 am, alaskangrizzly said:

    Perhaps I should e-mail this article the mayors in the valley here in the greater Phoenix metroplex.

  9. #9
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:33 am, bloghooligan said:

    the first mayor that offers illegals one way bus tickets to San Fransisco gets my vote.

    good for them…however, you know in the hollow halls of the DNC this is only proving their narrative that the south’s racist.

  10. #10
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:34 am, nuss said:

    Good news indeed. Thanks Michelle for keeping us up-to-date. Hopefully the idiots in Washington and southern California and San Francisco will get the message….but I’m not holding my breath.

  11. #11
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:35 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Prime example of Americans who still believe in holding the line. Warms my heart.

  12. #12
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:38 am, Misscheryl said:

    Oklahoma has passed some of the strongest anti-illegal immigration laws in the nation - makes me proud to be an Oklahoman. Now our illegals are Kansas’ and Arkansas’ illegals!

    Whoever says this isn’t an important issue (one of THE most important issues) to us, isn’t paying very close attention.

  13. #13
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:39 am, abstractmind said:

    Awesome to see!

    ACLU begins whining in 3…..2…..1…..

    I say demagnetize the whole thing. Would love to see this everywhere!

  14. #14
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:39 am, tomk59 said:

    “All politics are local”. Things will turn around when Americans get fed up and act on a local level. Grass roots and up, folks. Works every time.

  15. #15
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:41 am, rightwingmom said:

    Absolutely correct Michelle. We can take our nation back! One street, town, city, and state at a time.

    bloghooligan #9 - I gave up worring about what DNC, liberals, an PC police thought years ago. Doing what’s right isn’t always popular.

  16. #16
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:43 am, WarTip said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:32 am, sambo said:

    Jaded and WarTip…yall have a point but there efforts will do no good if Juan/Obama X makes all the illegals, legals.

    Hopefully we can stave that off if and when it happens to come along again. If not though, there are going to be thirty or forty more million coming across the border to replace them and get their piece of the American Pie that real American’s don’t want can’t get! We still need these people in office. Preferably now before it is too late.

  17. #17
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:46 am, neko-chan said:

    hmmm… I live in a town where every season (summer, and winter) there is a deluge of texan tourists. They are generally mocked, disparaged and treated like crap because for the most part they act like, well, a-hole tourists. They can’t drive (and think they can), they’re rude and self-righteous and far too proud of being texan.
    But it’s things like this that make me secretly root for texas… it seems to be the only semi-sane state in the country.

  18. #18
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:47 am, katieanne said:

    Thank God for state’s rights. If the Feds won’t take care of it, we’ll take care of it ourselves. Won’t be the first time Washington has let us down.

  19. #19
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:47 am, sambo said:

    WarTip said:
    Hopefully we can stave that off if and when it happens to come along again. If not though, there are going to be thirty or forty more million coming across the border to replace them and get their piece of the American Pie that real American’s don’t want can’t get! We still need these people in office. Preferably now before it is too late.

    without a doubt my friend.

  20. #20
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:49 am, rogerbacon said:

    Its definately a winning position. I wish we could come up with a better sounding name than “anti-illegal immigration” though. Whenever you let the media characterize your side as “anti” anything it always makes it sound like you are the bad guys. Just look at the media’s choice of words to describe the abortion debate. Their side is “pro”(choice) ours is “Anti”(abortion). Americans are generally optimistic and whenever you give someone a pro or anti choice they tend to subconsciously favor toe “pro” choice.

  21. #21
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:49 am, spo-con said:

    ATTN: Juan McCain ! Are you listening ? This is the PEOPLE talking. When it comes to this border subject, he is off in lefty land somewhere. If he wasn’t born with shoulders he could run his head another 3 feet up his a$$ !!

  22. #22
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:55 am, TexasPride said:

    My two favorite cities here in the DFW metroplex: Farmers Branch and Irving.

    I told a buddy of mine about the efforts made this year in Irving, and he asked if he could have his property taxes go to Irving even though he doesn’t live there. (we pay property taxes in lieu of State income taxes down here)

  23. #23
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:56 am, TXRose said:

    I read an article this weekend where anti illegal
    immigration was called “misplaced nativism.” Personally, I like the term nativism, or, as my 80 year
    old neighbor termed it when we were talking,
    lawful or righteous nativism.

  24. #24
    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:59 am, WestCoastCoconut said:

    Great now I have something to look for on Univision propaganda machine. Of course they will spit and twist this story around as racist and anti-immigrant mayor.

    Arizona, now Texas, Can someone in California help get the ball rolling here! Jon and Ken Radio show please help.

  25. #25
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:00 pm, tre said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:38 am, Misscheryl said:
    Oklahoma has passed some of the strongest anti-illegal immigration laws in the nation - makes me proud to be an Oklahoman.

    As well as I am, Miss Cheryl.

    There are parts of Oklahoma City where one would almost think one was in Mexico City, instead.
    I have nothing whatsoever against immigrants. I’m married to one. But there is a right way to do it.

  26. #26
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:03 pm, Mohawk said:

    The Feds won’t do it so it falls on the States to protect it’s citizens from this illegal invasion that is strapping education, health care, and our prison systems.

    I hope this spreads like a wild fire through out Americas states!

    Good for the people that voted to make a change!

  27. #27
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:06 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:00 pm, tre said:

    I have nothing whatsoever against immigrants. I’m married to one. But there is a right way to do it.

    Amen brother. People try and spin that since we are anti-illegal immigration that we are against all immigration. Total bullcrap, I am all for people who want to come here and work legally by going through the proper channels and not breaking the law.

  28. #28
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:08 pm, gandolphxx said:

    More cities would go this route if we could enforce the voter id laws.

    BTW, Dallas and Houston are still sanctuaries, San Antonio is completely gone.

  29. #29
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Sovereign Nation or Sanctuary Nation: It’s your The only choice.

  30. #30
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, J S Ragman said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:49 am, rogerbacon said:
    I wish we could come up with a better sounding name than “anti-illegal immigration” though.

    How about “law and order”?

    Just look at the media’s choice of words to describe the abortion debate. Their side is “pro”(choice) ours is “Anti”(abortion).

    I prefer to think of our side as “pro-life” and theirs as “anti-child”.

  31. #31
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:10 pm, Misscheryl said:

    I have nothing whatsoever against immigrants. I’m married to one. But there is a right way to do it.

    That’s a given and I for one am done justifying my position on this. If someone can’t figure out the difference between illegal and legal…well, there’s not alot of hope for them and terminology won’t help.

  32. #32
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:16 pm, Southpaw said:

    Illegal immigrant advocates claim that illegals are a net gain financially for communities. When cities, counties and states start to see the enormous financial drain that illegals cause, the trickle of communities opposing illegal immigrants will become a tidal wave.
    It is time to start aggressively going after businesses at the local level who
    hire illegals. They have an unfair competitive advantage and are making their ill-gotten gains at the expense of their communities. Start giving scrutiny to businesses in your community, shine the spotlight on their activities and make them accountable for their actions.

  33. #33
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:26 pm, The_Livewire said:

    I try to be fair to both sides.

    Pro-life & Pro-death

    So why not Pro-Law and Pro-Lawlessness?

  34. #34
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, RobM1981 said:

    President McCain would refer to this mayor as a “bigot,” and likely have him jailed.

    President Obama would refer to this mayor as a “bitter clinger to guns and religion,” and likely have him sent to “reprogramming camp” in S. Chicago.

    Either way, no worries. All will be well come this November.

    ugh…

  35. #35
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:34 pm, rambler said:

    Great news! We all need to take back this country, town by town and city by city.

  36. #36
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:38 pm, nbarry said:

    Here is an easy way for the states to crack down. Audit employers over whether they are understating their payrolls in filing their unemployment insurance returns, and be strict about off-the-books workers.

  37. #37
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:39 pm, Rekd said:

    I’m afraid Calif will be last on that list.

  38. #38
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:43 pm, John Ansell said:

    spo-con said:
    ATTN: Juan McCain ! Are you listening ? This is the PEOPLE talking. When it comes to this border subject, he is off in lefty land somewhere. If he wasn’t born with shoulders he could run his head another 3 feet up his a$$ !!

    Give him some time, he’ll get it up there. Shoulders or not.

  39. #39
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:45 pm, fred5676 said:

    I would love to be a fly on the wall during a Bush/McCain/Kennedy strategy meeting, trying to figure out how they can grant a giant amnesty/rewards program before all the illegal aliens have left our country because the states and cities are “doing the job the American President and Congress won’t do.”

    See some of the progress here.

    Note that the Mississippi state legislature voted a combined 165 to 8 to pass their strict enforcement law. Take that, open borders lobbyists!

  40. #40
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, graysonret said:

    Slowly and surely, a revolt is beginning to blossom. We’ve got to keep the ball rolling so that D.C. will be forced into doing something. Politicians hear when voices are raised at the ballot box. Bringing to mind, Thomas Jefferson, a little revolt now and again, is good for the liberty tree.

  41. #41
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, John Ansell said:

    Did anybody notice McInsane’s interview with O’Reilly on immigration? When pushed on the immigration issue he said “I will conced that the American People want the border secured”. Translation, I want open borders but the people are p*ssed.

  42. #42
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:55 pm, michiganmom said:

    I like the term “Pro-law & order immigration”.

  43. #43
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, cpodug said:

    Just think - if California really wants to solve it’s budget crisis, all they have to do is stop being a sanctuary state. Presto - 20 billion problem solved. How easy was that? Ahnuld? Ahnuld? Are you listening?

  44. #44
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:56 pm, Barry F. said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:29 pm, RobM1981 said:

    President Obama would refer to this mayor as a “bitter clinger to guns and religion,” and likely have him sent to “reprogramming camp” in S. Chicago.

    This is rather off-topic but did anyone else read the NewsMax report about Jeremiah Wright looking to get even with Obama for disowning him now?

  45. #45
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:57 pm, brooklyn red said:

    Yes, Good news.

    I agree with J S Ragman # 29, it’s about “law & order”. Has a nice ring to it, so why not say it often.

  46. #46
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, Barry F. said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:50 pm, John Ansell said:

    Did anybody notice McInsane’s interview with O’Reilly on immigration? When pushed on the immigration issue he said “I will conced that the American People want the border secured”. Translation, I want open borders but the people are p*ssed.

    O’Reilly really didn’t push him on immigration. That seemed like an awfully tame interview. And, if I remember correctly, McCain was allowed to spin quickly off the border to comprehensive immigration talk.

  47. #47
    On May 12th, 2008 at 12:58 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Last night I had a dream where my two state senators, John F. Kerry and Ted M. Keneedy, held a press conference where they stated that Massachusetts would no longer be a magnet state for illegal aliens, and that all social services would only be provided upon proof of citizenship. I then woke up and realized, damn, I haven’t wet the bed since I was seven. Honey! Wake up! Call Mattress Discounters stat!

  48. #48
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, Concerned Citizen said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:49 am, rogerbacon said:
    Its definately a winning position. I wish we could come up with a better sounding name than “anti-illegal immigration” though. Whenever you let the media characterize your side as “anti” anything it always makes it sound like you are the bad guys. Just look at the media’s choice of words to describe the abortion debate. Their side is “pro”(choice) ours is “Anti”(abortion). Americans are generally optimistic and whenever you give someone a pro or anti choice they tend to subconsciously favor toe “pro” choice.

    How about Pro Sovereignty?

  49. #49
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:00 pm, WestCoastCoconut said:

    I’m afraid Calif will be last on that list.

    Rekd, There is still hope here in California. It is just going to take someone with some backbone to stand up to the reconquista crowd. There are plenty of people who want Law and Order here. I just wish it could start now and not after we have to speak spanish. LOL

  50. #50
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:01 pm, grumbles said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:59 am, WestCoastCoconut said:

    Great now I have something to look for on Univision propaganda machine. Of course they will spit and twist this story around as racist and anti-immigrant mayor.

    But you can’t watch Univision or other Spanish language programming at the Farmers Branch Recreation Center. Seems all Spanish cable programing has been blocked. Odd for a city that is over 40% hispanic.

  51. #51
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:02 pm, John Ansell said:

    I agree Barry F. #45. Bill should have spent more time on the issue.

  52. #52
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, Azygos said:

    I’m not sure the Arizona law is working all that well. I see landscaping trucks pull up to the home depot a 1/2 mile from my home and hand out colored t-shirts with company logo on them. Half a dozen guys then put on the shirts and pile in the trucks.

    An easy way to prevent this is to have the Department of Revenue follow the truck to the worksite and then demand of the employer his employee records, income statements etc… Toss a few of these guys in jail for tax evasion and I think we might see a flood of illegals leaving, until then, not so much.

  53. #53
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:16 pm, Bob in Myrtle Beach said:

    brooklyn red said:
    “Yes, Good news.
    I agree with J S Ragman # 29, it’s about “law & order”. Has a nice ring to it, so why not say it often.”

    It’s too bad… the real “law & order” candidate should of been Fred Thompson.

  54. #54
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:17 pm, John Ansell said:

    Illegal Invaders killing the people Americans won’t kill

    Look how far down it it takes the paper to mention that this punk was Illegal. One further, there’s no mention on what they plan to do when his prison term of 5 years is up.

  55. #55
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:21 pm, sbw999 said:

    O’Reilly really didn’t push him on immigration. That seemed like an awfully tame interview. And, if I remember correctly, McCain was allowed to spin quickly off the border to comprehensive immigration talk.

    I agree. I think the entire exchange on illegal immigration lasted about 15 seconds, or so it seemed. I think Bill O let him off the hook. McFraud looked uncomfortable and OReilly should have nailed him on the issue.

  56. #56
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:23 pm, madchef said:

    It’s great that local governments are taking these steps and being proactive. That said, it will all be in vain if the Feds declare the foreign invaders citizens by giving them amnesty. We need to elect Congressmen who will stand up for U.S. citizens and not bow to special interest groups with deep pockets.

  57. #57
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, tomk59 said:

    O’Reilly has been useless for a while now. Remember Hannity on the radio about a month ago doing the ol’ softshoe with McCain, also.
    Too many of these guys are more worried about their celebrity and booksales now than about doing their jobs.

  58. #58
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, xler8bmw said:

    I saw the O’Reilly thing too and in his defense reporters are usually given the things they can ask and how far they can go in these kind of interviews.

    I guarantee that Bill was hand tied as to what he could ask about immigration.

    We know McShamnesty is lying and doesn’t want to be hard pressed!

  59. #59
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, nyc123me said:

    Congrats to the citizens and new Mayors of Farmer’s Branch and Irving.

  60. #60
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:29 pm, erikwhittington said:

    O’Hare for prez!

  61. #61
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:30 pm, Barry F. said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:24 pm, tomk59 said:

    O’Reilly has been useless for a while now. Remember Hannity on the radio about a month ago doing the ol’ softshoe with McCain, also.
    Too many of these guys are more worried about their celebrity and booksales now than about doing their jobs.

    In O’Reilly’s and Hannity’s situation, they should be well enough off that they could do a hard-hitting interview without worrying about repercussions.

    Between their time on Fox, their radio shows and their book sales, they should be more than set for life. *sigh*

    When will we get someone that will take all candidates to task? I want interviews where every candidate has to answer tough questions. I used to think that would happen on Fox. But, they too are turning soft in their coverage of politics.

    It did my heart so much good to see George and Charlie ask tougher questions in the last Democrat debate.

  62. #62
    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:32 pm, Barry F. said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 1:28 pm, xler8bmw said:

    I saw the O’Reilly thing too and in his defense reporters are usually given the things they can ask and how far they can go in these kind of interviews.

    I guarantee that Bill was hand tied as to what he could ask about immigration.

    We know McShamnesty is lying and doesn’t want to be hard pressed!

    So, why would an real journalist want to interview them? If your hands are tied, why bother wasting your time getting only the answers you know they want to give? :-(

  63. #63
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:03 pm, xler8bmw said:

    #61 Bill O’Reilly isn’t a journalist he’s a commentator

  64. #64
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:27 pm, conservativeindian said:

    how about pro-American. Can’t beat that.

  65. #65
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:29 pm, Terri said:

    The local level is where Americans can still have some influence. The federal level elction rules are full of incumbent protections. The result is voters feel they don’t have a say on federal elections. We end up with massive voter apathy. Sad but true. There is hope through local elections. A revolution from the bottom up.

  66. #66
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, abstractmind said:

    Bobby Jindal ‘12

    Enough said.

  67. #67
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:44 pm, tomk59 said:

    Terri’ the local level is where you have a lot of influence (if enough of you get involved) and the best chance of making a difference. And it trickles up. Stay informed, show up to PTA’s and town council meetings, use the phones and e-mails, etc.

  68. #68
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:46 pm, Gator70 said:

    Proof that the American people still control what is going on. We still have the power, I believe most American’s don’t understand how their local and state governments work. It was always supposed to be about the State, not the Fed.

  69. #69
    On May 12th, 2008 at 2:48 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Carrollton elected a new mayor over the weekend who vows that ridding the city of illegal aliens is his top priority.

    And right next door to Farmer’s Branch. Go Dallas!

  70. #70
    On May 12th, 2008 at 3:14 pm, henryinga said:

    O’Reilly used to be my favorite commentator for he didn’t allow anyone to spin on a question, but since the democrats took over Congress, he’s allowing more spin and I don’t watch him as much as I use to. I watched only a portion of his what’s her name and McCain’s interveiw, but couldn’t watch it all because he was too soft. I definitley won’t watch Obummer, if he comes on. I can’t stand the Marxsist, and won’t watch one second of him on my television.
    I just wish we had a better Republican to vote for, because I can’t vote democrat, no matter what,but I am voting.

  71. #71
    On May 12th, 2008 at 3:16 pm, bilgerat said:

    Congratulations to Mr. O’Hare and Mr. Gears!

    Keep up the good fight!

  72. #72
    On May 12th, 2008 at 4:36 pm, twoninerkilo said:

    I love the smell of napalm in the morning. Smells like… Victory.

  73. #73
    On May 12th, 2008 at 4:56 pm, rightisright said:

    Hard to believe, but here in Orygun there is a petition started to have placed on the ballot this Nov. one has to show American proof of citizenship and/or legal documentation in order to acquire a driver’s license. It’s not a lot but its a start, sad to say Orygun is one of 8 states that allow illegals to acquire a driver’s license.
    The law is appropriately named “Respect the Law Act” It’s ways blue here even under grey skies…can’t be but a handleful of conservatives here.

  74. #74
    On May 12th, 2008 at 5:08 pm, Chuck said:

    It’s like there’s The Looking Glass between America and the political class. We want the illegal invaders out and nice immigrants who follow the rules in. We want and end to the Global Warming/Climate Change scam. Etc., etc., etc. The three stooges running for POTUS are running bassackwards to the people. What is it??

  75. #75
    On May 12th, 2008 at 5:11 pm, Salukidog said:

    Definately some welcome good news. Just wish it keeps coming. I did just read a couple articles at Drudge Report that were uplifting. The first, about a major raid in Iowa. The second, about voter ID in Arizona. The article about AZ. voter ID stated that after implementing such a radical idea, they actually had to throw out 38,000 registrations. That’s the next step we need to start pushing. Its pretty obvious who those 38,000 (as well as all the illegals in other staes) are planning to vote for, just look who is fighting against voter ID.

  76. #76
    On May 12th, 2008 at 5:34 pm, Freddy said:

    Regarding O’Reilly, he clearly stated last year he is FOR Comprehensive Immigration Reform. No reason to expect him to press anyone on the illegal alien situation.

  77. #77
    On May 12th, 2008 at 5:37 pm, John Ansell said:

    Good Point Freddy.#76. Bill is above all and would not have to deal with gang bangers destroying his property.

  78. #78
    On May 12th, 2008 at 6:29 pm, sasintexas said:

    Hooray for Texas! lets hope all the states that want to follow our lead get
    on the bandwagon, one city, one state at
    a time. Were taking back our country,thats the one with the red, white & blue flag-go America…

  79. #79
    On May 12th, 2008 at 8:32 pm, purple1 said:

    I live in the Metroplex not far from the cities that have taken decisive action against illegals and it makes me proud to be a Texan. I hope that more cities in N. Texas make the same decision as it is killing our school systems and our hospitals. Thank you Farmers Branch and Irving!

  80. #80
    On May 12th, 2008 at 9:46 pm, libocrat said:

    The Illegal Mexigrant issue is simple and can be summed up as such:
    Liberals/Democrats want them here. They want their votes. They want them unionized in the “fields” (no pun intended) in which they work. They want them beholding to Lib/Democrats.
    Libs/Democrats don’t believe in the “RULE OF LAW”. PERIOD.
    Republicans want to “massage” the issue. Some are afraid to piss off constituencies in their districts. Some want the cheap labor for certain business interests, and some are just weak RINO’s. McCain wants to appease.

  81. #81
    On May 12th, 2008 at 10:01 pm, TXRose said:

    OT…Salukidog, I was at the Ft Worth dog show in March and my papillon and I
    got to hang out with two beautiful Salukis. One was a male named Khalil and
    a 9 month old female named Bibi. I have always wanted one but thought I did
    not have enough room. Now I find out I do when I have two girls and husband
    says no more ( and I agree).
    My next door neighbor just informed me he has joined They Do Not Speak For
    Me. I’m proud of him!

  82. #82
    On May 12th, 2008 at 10:05 pm, BOB said:

    On May 12th, 2008 at 11:38 am, Misscheryl said:
    Oklahoma has passed some of the strongest anti-illegal immigration laws in the nation - makes me proud to be an Oklahoman. Now our illegals are Kansas’ and Arkansas’ illegals!
    Whoever says this isn’t an important issue (one of THE most important issues) to us, isn’t paying very close attention.

    I live in Arkansas…thanks a lot! Just kidding, but you’re right….and Governor Beebe is greeting them with open arms. Has nothing to do with Tyson’s owning the state I’m sure.

    Hang tough in Oklahoma, maybe I’ll move there someday.

  83. #83
    On May 12th, 2008 at 10:48 pm, uhangtight said:

    This is the only way we can get this done. One city, one county and one state at a time. The powers in DC are bought and paid for by special interests; and these special interests/owned party leaders made sure we did not have a choice of POTUS that would be a leader when it comes to keeping our sovereignity. Yes, we can thank the liberals crossing over and voting in McCain as well as the liberal media for slamming any true conservative with a strong stand against illegal immigration.

    Eventually, we will close these borders down state by state! Of course, I keep seeing California as wide open. But, once they are over invaded and bankrupt maybe the cities here will start to follow suit. I am talking true Hope and Change!!

  84. #84
    On May 13th, 2008 at 8:01 am, IndependentTom said:

    While I congratulate the citizens of these locales on sane thinking at their local level, I remain pessimistic. Until the laws against employing illegals grow some real teeth I think we’re spinning our wheels.

  85. #85
    On May 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am, smellycat41 said:

    MAYBE just MAYBE, the American people have had enough of this invasion! It is about time! It has only taken 20 years of invasion to come to this point. I might be wrong but I would be willing to bet we have spent FAR MORE on illegals than we have in Iraq!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not all is well in GOP land

September 3, 2008 01:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

130 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Curb your enthusiasm.

What the GOP platform says about immigration

September 2, 2008 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The rule of law.

The GOP platform: Putting face-saving above principle

August 27, 2008 03:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

The capitulation you deserve.

LPGA to golfers: Speak English

August 27, 2008 11:26 AM by Michelle Malkin

91 Comments | 1 Trackback

“[I]t is important for our players to effectively communicate…”

GOP platform fight over shamnesty euphemisms

August 26, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

105 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Crooked talk.

Daddy Yankee endorsement: Another pathetic McCain pander

August 25, 2008 04:11 PM by Michelle Malkin

128 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Juan Hernandez approves!

Suing San Francisco

August 25, 2008 10:43 AM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Sick and tired of sanctuary.

RNC’s new radio ad: McCain’s a bigger Hispanderer than Obama!

August 22, 2008 02:57 PM by Michelle Malkin

203 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

“How do you know someone is a friend?”


Categories: Immigration


JustOneMinute

» Boys Will Be Boys?

Weekly Standard

» A Shrum Victory at Last?