Quote of the day
“Normally, I want to b*tch slap Michelle Malkin. However, I agree with her. Girls are under tremendous amount of pressure to grow up fast.”
– Comment posted at the WashingtonPost.com in response to my column on Beyonce’s new brand of pedophilia chic.
Posted in: Girls Gone Wild
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Girls Gone Wild
Little Miss Attila
» Okay, Ladies.
Belmont Club
» Both sides nowMarginal Revolution
» Why so many churches in Las Vegas?NewsBusters.org
» Us Magazine Hit Hard by Canceling Subscribers After Palin AttackRiehl World View
» Whoa! Palin BEAT Obama In Ratings ScorePower Line
» 40 Million?!JustOneMinute
» Now The Surge Is Succeeding?Little Miss Attila
» Well, You Know: G.W. Bush Didn't Vet His VP, Either.TigerHawk
» "We lost their trust"Redstate
» The Palin And McCain Speeches
from Geraldo’s cousin?
Sheeesh, bet you just love reading stuff like that.
Just another example of liberal tolerance…as long as you agree with them.
and the lame brain commenter probably loves Rosie…. lol, dipstick.
And we wonder why civilization has ended. And we wonder why childhood is so often tragic for so many. God help us. We obviously can’t. Or won’t.
Why would parents even consider buying this crap? I don’t think most would. Sadly, enough must consider it or it wouldn’t even be around to make news.
Beam me up, Scotty, it’s over.
Would it occur to that person that maybe, just maybe girls shouldn’t grow up like that at all? Even as adults it’s a bad thing to dress/behave like sluts?
It’s ironic that liberals wonder why conservatives are so adamant about 2nd Amendment rights.
Wow, what a brave thing to say on a posting. What a brave poster. I wonder if they would have the chutzpah to say the same thing if she were in the same room with them….
Does anyone see that abosolute irony with this?. “B*tch Slap” normally constitutes complete disrespect of a woman…..yet, the poster is against dressing these little ones in hooker attire. hmmmmmm.
Maybe it is an odd connection. But the poster needs to do a serious self check regardless.
MM should like it…it validates that liberals cannot argue with facts. So they’d rather resort to slapping…or spitting. Always classy, those libs.
yeah with a lice comb.
#9 - agreed but so slimey. I mean really. They would never have said it to her face…?
AJ, you funny.
Sounds like something Huff Puff would say.
What? Whats the big deal? S/He’s saying she DOESN’T want to b#tch slap MM*.
Are you saying you do, AJ? Why do you hate MM, AJ?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*this time
bitchslap? What is this? facebook?
#14 - if that wasnt the stretch of all stretches.
Really, Chappa-my-arse-quick. You are an intellegent man (i think?)…why you chucking pennies at people?
You can do better than arguing semantics backwards…can’t you?
I hate people who make threats, especially those who make threats from the safety of their keyboards.
It was a joke, feebie. There is no need to imply or threaten violence against any one, including MM, because you disagree with them politically.
#17 - thank you Chappy. Much better.
I am not surprised at all that a great number of comments were more toward calling tacky it but not sexual. I can only imagine what THEIR kids dress like. Thanks WaPo, pure class all the way. And they wanna plant a slap on our Michelle ? Pahleeze !
Huh?
#20 - It was a joke Chappy.
U know…a joke?
Heh chapoutier brilliant statement a$$hole. A real in depth analysis.
Oh I know its a joke, I just am trying to figure out where the “quick” comes into play.
It musta been a dirty Frenchman who said this. God damn sissy Frenchmen.
Chappaquiddick? Liberal Lake…
Yes, you’ve succeeded in making me explain it…now its no longer funny (as if it ever was???).
Ho-hum
Take care all. Out for the night.
Yeah, I loved this comment coming from you, seeing as you try to come off as the e-baddest, e-toughest, e-mofo around.
Do not address me. Seriously. There are plenty here that seem perfectly capable of having rational (and sometimes humorous) discussion with me.
You, on the other hand, add absolutely zero to this board. You should have been reported to the mods ages ago.
DJ - Ah yes, and they’re against the war because they like peeeeeace.
Reminds me once of a lib from Canada who called the US warmongers after the 9/11 attack. After several ’rounds’ with me and a few others she attempted to send everyone to a site that promted a download with a computer virus. She sent me my very own personal virus she called babyjesus.exe while posing as a fellow pro-lifer. I was expecting it though (after she tried to nuke everyone’s computers) and checked the headers. Her IP was all over it.
Yep, they’re all for peace all right.
My apologies, feebie.
Actually, it IS funny now.
chappy may be right, I might have been to rough on her/him with the lame brain part, this person actully could put a sentence together… unlike some of the mail Michelle has received.
chapoutier said:
Aw, you’re just mad you forgot you’re harpsichord Frenchman.
The comments on Fark and a couple of other pop culture sites leaned that way as well. There seemed to be a divide between people with kids and without.
Michelle,
Whether it’s you, Howard Stern or Bill O’Reilly, I don’t understand taking the time to give attention to those “nobodys” that criticize you. It only emboldens those looking for free press. I just don’t get it.
That’s my take.
mistressjustice said:
That was a stupid comment you give me attention all the time and all I do is criticize the hell out of you. Hippocryate.
Great, the JusticeJuice and the Dirty Frenchman are lurking around. I’m out…
Fixed that for ya.
Mistress,
Just ignore “l’il-try-to-act-all-e-tough-but-can’t-even-spell-my-own-screen-name- correctly.”
Chapoutier:
That’s my new deal with this guy. After he accused me of being a racist for my American Beauty reference on the Obamaintightjeans thread, and his bizarre effort to pick a fight here, I understand that he’s just not well. I have broken my rule to never argue with children, or the mentally ill too many times on MM.com. From here on out undersem69 falls under IGNORE HIM for me.
I love libs, it’s like corraling lemmings over the cliff. Where would the world be without Dirty Frenchmen and Affirnative Action cases. Lol.
Huh. Ordinarily I would say, at least they agree with you! But, I don’t think that will help much. At least you won’t find anyone on this site wanting to b**ch slap you!
OT
Hmm, I’m beginning to think friends don’t let friends type drunk, but I could be wrong.
/OT
Aloha Guy, methinks you’ve just given me a new slogan…
The truth is these two don’t anything besides ingratiate their own egos. The truth these two aren’t the ones who are empathetic enough to realize that receiving threats, whether you’re insulated against them or not, is a pretty serious thing.
You’re welcome to use it!
Hey Michelle,
Let’s coin a new term:
Fact-slap - what Michelle does to people of the liberal persuasion who can’t form a coherant argument.
“Rev Wright proclaims that black people can’t get a leg up so Michelle Malkin ‘fact-slapped’ him with his 10,000 square foot 1.6 million dollar mansion and the nice Mercedes he drives. Left in a daze from the fact-slap the Rev then went on vacation for 7 months.”
Joy- #28
Yup, that sounds like something a
petulant childlibtard would doYou handled it just right- you beat her with your brain. No contest.
Nice to see it.
You know what I find interesting about liberals? Liberals are bigots. Liberals see Michelle as a woman, not a Conservative with a different opinion than theirs.
Libs think women are homogenous. Real women are feminist activists, fighting for their sisters right to abort her child. Women are angry at “the man” keeping them down. Women are just another “union” of voters to Democrats.
It’s the same with blacks. Real blacks believe in Affirmative action, set asides, and reparations. Real blacks should be grateful to Democrats for helping them, because Democrats know that without Democrat help, blacks are also being oppressed and held down by the man. And therefore are incapable of succeeding without the help of Democrats.
It’s called PANDERING. It lacks any sense of mutual respect.
So naturally if you are a woman, and you don’t toe the Democrat line, you are a BITCH that needs to be SLAPPED.
Hope and Change for everyone!!!
I didn’t read it and I don’t care. Post something meaningful Michelle.
Semper Fi
It appears that Chapoutier and mistressjustice have chosen to take the, gang up and call someone mentally ill, mutual circle jerk path of rational discourse. That always works well. It’s much like a University faculty being astonished that people outside of their tenured, elitist, tax funded, cushy world, actually watch NASCAR and shop at GASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSP….Wal-Mart.
Oh it’s so cute, they sit around with their sandals, beards,and tie dyed Jerry Garcia or Mumia shirts stunned that others actually eat red meat!!!
Ah yes, the richness of Diveristy at work.
“Fact-slapped.”
Now that’s got a ring to it.
This thread digressed totally. But that spruced things up quite a bit.
Perhaps it’s because Hannity just did a piece on Al Franken, but he’s (Franken) the unfortunate image who popped (or pooped) into my head as someone who might say that…Oh, wait, Al Franken would think little girls dressing up like tramps is a “progressive”, therefore good, thing. After all, liberals just “love” the children, sometimes a little too much.
B*tch slap??
Umm, how does that work exactly?
Yeah, but I doubt it’s the people without kids buying this crap for the six-year-olds not in their care.
15 year old Moms, have never been imparted moral standards.
Liberals recoil in HORROR at the notion that 15 year old Moms are WRONG.
There once was some lib at The Post,
Who tried to get fresh with our host,
By implying a b*tch slap, or something like that,
But if he ever stepped up, he’d be toast.
Lame. Yet another example of the charming erudite commentary of the foaming at the mouth left.
DJ - I always told her she overestimated her own brilliance (like some we know, lol) and underestimated mine and that was why I always got the best of her.
Maybe I’m being an optomist, but I don’t think that line of clothing is going to sell well. I don’t think our society, as a whole, is ready for such trash. Sure, some will buy, because some are just “gone” when it comes to common sense, but I think most parents would refuse such stuff. I do know that kids like to go to a “friend’s” house and change into something provocative before school. Seen that, working in schools. Such people hid behind their keyboards to be provocative, that they certainly wouldn’t do, face to face. It shows lack of class and such opinions aren’t worth spending time reading.
morning folks,
graysonret is right. classless.
if a conservative had let that slip, it’d be hell to pay.
So often liberals advocate violence against those with whom they disagree, or resort to name-calling, or, as Joy in #28 showed, tried to destroy their personnal property, all in the name of peace and “tolerance”.
But, I do like the fact we can agree on the need to raise children with good morals, and the need to just let them be children rather than making them grow up too quickly.
I’m always impressed by the thin skins of people here. I’ve been threatened with all kinds of violence, worse than bitch slapping.
MM, if that kind of talk bothers you, don’t allow it on your blog. p.s. I appreciate your openness to political debate.
#61 said:
I thought we were taught that a man should be impressed by the content of one’s character, and not by the thinness of his skin?
I’m always impressed by the thin content of your comments here.
Maybe I’ve got MM wrong on this one, but I think many of you have missed the point of this thread. I think MM is making the point that even a hardened liberal who otherwise has complete disdain for Michelle and her views agrees with her as to the ridiculousness of this particular clothing line.
undrseige, just curious. What do you do for a living?
I think you are right concerning the point of the thread Dakine, but I think another point is that she’s showcasing another “liberal” yahoo who is insulting her. Much like Bill O., I think she diminshes herself by giving press to people that otherwise aren’t noteworthy or relevant. It’s supposed to create a gang up session on the insulter in question, but I think it showcases a trait of thin-skinned, pettiness, and wasted webspace. But hell, it’s not my blog.
On a sidenote, you gotta read Bill Simmons’ new article on Doc Rivers and the Celtics. The man is brilliant.